TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fuckharvey Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by fuckharvey on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

By that logic, you could also say that men shouldn't be allowed to have human rights because we can't rise above our instinct to fawn over and have sex with fertile women as that's what our animal biology pushes us to do. Except men aren't the gatekeepers for sex, hence the fact that girls being sluts and guys not isn't a double standard. Also, men can easily cover their urge by jerking off (and do, a LOT). Women can follow, but won't because they can simply go find a dick to bounce on. The fact…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/16 05:30 PM
1

So women shouldn't be allowed human rights because they can't rise above the instinct to run around an fuck alphas because that's what their animal biology pushes them to do? The point is, they have to be held accountable for their own fucking actions or they need to have their rights removed and treated like children.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/16 12:25 AM
1

Wrong. Sex may not be a need, but it’s a bit more than a want as the species need to procreate. Men who don’t get sex tend to lead quite miserable lives, some go as far as Eliot Rodgers. And no lets not use outliers like Newton and Tesla. If sex isn’t important, TRP might as well not exist. Girls also have a component of a sex drive, may be less than a mans, but nevertheless, they need to get laid, and its not just solely a currency or bartering chip in exchange for commitment. Sex has a pleasur…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/16 08:05 PM
2

They have sexual needs and need sex as sell WRONG As a human you need food, water, oxygen. To have a decent chance of survival, you additionally need some education (k-12 is enough), a roof over your head to keep your dry, and clothes to keep you warm and protected from the elements. EVERYTHING else is a want. Girls want sex, they don't need it. And it's not like they can't get a fucking rubber toy to use. They're cheap, clean, and don't ruin your value to a long term mate. So stop saying this b…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/16 06:59 PM
5

Jeremy Clarkson hates them because they are too dependable so you never get to replace them.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/16 12:08 PM
1

Just don't buy the knockoff, the Lexi.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/16 12:07 PM
1

I did sports, not poker. At that point it's about good statistical modeling. Nothing more, nothing less. So yeah, I sat in an office pouring over spreadsheets of numbers all day long. Pretty much what an accountant does. I guess it's more the "romantic" idea of what a pro gambler does. Sorta like the "romantic" idea of what a fire fighter is (fighting serious fires and that romantic idea of saving lives is more like 2-3% of the time). Or the romantic idea of a cop, busting doors down, going on r…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/16 09:02 AM
1

Eh, I did sports betting but it drew girls and they'd act super interested. I'm sure card players do just as well. Though when I played poker, most of the people were over 40. But I'm sure the younger card players do well.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/16 08:46 PM
29

There is another category you forgot: professional gamblers Girls are always interested in the "I'm a professional gambler" line. Guess it combines the "bad boy" (risk taker) with the "rich" line. Ironically most professional (profitable) gamblers are no more interesting than an accountant.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/16 08:18 PM
0

I quit playing games just over a year ago. Unfortunately...it's because I work 70-100 hours a week. Also...my job is in esports (professional gaming)...damnit. At least I'm making money at my pc gaming job and not just wasting my time. :) I'll also note I'd wanted to play video games for a living ever since I got to play NES for the first time back in '91. So I'm quite happy with my job and if girls don't like it, they can go fuck themselves because I'm still smarter than they are (have an engin…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/16 04:45 PM
1

Well if you get married, it doesn't really matter if it was prior to the marriage or not because there are a lot of shared assets and the debt holder will simply force her to pay up at some point which usually means you losing too. But then again, I said, "Never marry a woman with debt", for a reason.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/16 03:33 AM
2

Hard to exactly say, but I'm sure they would put a lien on the house which would mean they get first rights. Likely how it would go is they'd force you to either pay her shit off or liquidate the asset and then you get whatever is left over. Of course, you'd still be fcked in the end because liquidating a house would cost you a ton in commissions, taxes, closing costs, etc. So you'd lose a ton of money all the same. That doesn't even count the fact that the original mortgage from the bank would …
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 04:01 AM
2

Which doesn't actually work for many co-shared assets after marriage such as a house. So it doesn't matter about "separating" debts prior to a marriage, no matter how you do it, because there are plenty of shared assets after you get married. The debtors can still take her "half" which invariably means all of it. Therefore you end up with the same damned situation and you're just as screwed. But what do I know, I have zero debt and would never marry a girl that has more than a few grand in debt.…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/16 11:55 AM
2

Which is crap because if he had married her, half of her debt would be his responsibility, legally.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/16 12:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter