TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fuckingkike Archive

View 0 posts and 270 comments by fuckingkike on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-shattuck-case-20150616-story.html "Ex-Baltimore Ravens' cheerleader Molly Shattuck pleads guilty to rape"
/r/MensRights18/06/15 01:23 PM
-13

Should have paid it first time around. Pussy.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:44 AM
7

You declined sex, and then gave her back the power to decide when sex happens in exchange for having sex without foreplay this one time. Nice work.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/15 04:24 PM
1

You're not so good at this logic stuff, I see.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 03:00 AM
-2

After assessment they incorporate some appropriate work that's occasionally like yoga. They don't "do yoga". And since "the pros do it, that's good enough for me" is the quintessence of broscience, how about you go look up some shit: http://www.physio-pedia.com/
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 05:18 PM
-7

I told you what I propose: targeted work appropriate for identified weaknesses, not a scattershot approach where you just hope and pray what you do sticks, something that also gives ammo to religious cunts like you. Google "hypermobility injuries" if you like.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 04:53 PM
-2

Do you know nothing about current work in sports rehab?
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 04:42 PM
-6

Yes, "unreliable", not "completely ineffective". It's better than nothing in the same way farting around in the gym is. That "athletic monsters" do it only shows how far behind the state of the art they are.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 04:40 PM
-6

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127084 Stretching is better than yoga at reducing stress, so you're probably better off with stretching and zen meditation than with yoga.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 03:33 PM
-11

Yoga is a joke. It's haphazard, unreliable and prone to mysticism. The girly equivalent of fuckarounditis. Assess mobility and movement patterns and correct deficiencies with focused work the way you would any other weakness.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 03:26 PM
5

Hitler did indeed make nonagression pact with Russia, but it was a deception that was part of his invasion plan. That's why he still invaded that year, even after losing time in Greece: he didn't think he'd be able to keep up the ruse for another year. Per William L. Shirer's The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, I believe.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/14 09:30 PM
0

Not really. The Germans went into Russia late because they were busy handling the temper tantrum Mussolini threw in Greece. It's more 19 and 35 that were violated here.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/14 07:45 PM
1

Blond hair is worth as much as a college degree.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 09:09 PM
1

Yes. And now yours, too. It is indeed quite funny, though I doubt you'd be able to figure out why.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 08:39 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/F7MSb.gif
/r/MensRights29/12/14 08:10 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/F7MSb.gif
/r/MensRights29/12/14 08:00 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/F7MSb.gif
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:50 AM
1

Don't be afraid.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:40 AM
0

Of course you don't see the problems you're having. Crazy people rarely do. But surely it tugs at you around the edges of your awareness. How you've never really been as happy as the people around you, how you can't really understand them, how you don't seem to be able to get what you want out of life, how you think you're smarter than other people but always seem to have trouble getting them to understand you. I can't help you, but a therapist might be able to.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:29 AM
1

You jumped in randomly without understanding, engage in behavior you accuse me of, and show a diatinct lack of social awareness. If I had to guess, I'd expect something on the autism spectrum or in the cluster B personality disorders. But you really should see a professional for treatment and diagnosis.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:16 AM
0

Oh, please, do you really think normal people can't identify crazies? Seriously, kiddo, you need professional help.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:05 AM
1

You're confusing understanding with helping. There's that lack of reading comprehension of yours again. Do better.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:55 AM
0

No, normal people understand crazies just fine. Crazies like you just don't understand anything, even that you're crazy. Is that why you're accusing me in a roundabout way of being crazy? You think everyone's crazy?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:36 AM
0

See what I mean? You're just now figuring this out.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:20 AM
-2

It's a shame you've failed to maintain even those elite skills.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:07 AM
-2

A lack of basic reading comprehension is the least of your problems, kiddo.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:57 AM
-2

You poor deluded moron. Now you're just making things up. It really is a pathetic display of your ignorance. Do continue, though. I relish the thought of the day that you ever figure out what's going on.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:45 AM
0

I understand they've been up and running since September. They're lacking drivers, and the more money you offer, the more applicants you get. That's how it works. If you can pay more than any other driving service, you can steal their female employees, or encourage women who wouldn't otherwise choose such an occupation. Hell, for high enough wages, you might see men getting sex changes to meet the criteria. Remember, this isn't about getting all women, but about getting enough women.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 12:39 AM
0

Aww, you're so special. Go tell your mommy. She'll be so proud of you.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 12:01 AM
-1

And you're a moron. Good job.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 11:48 PM
-1

Yeah, you're having problems with reading comprehension there, kiddo. As an exercise, look up the difference between revenue and profit. That should help you understand where your straw man is coming from.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 11:37 PM
-5

No. I didn't. You're confusing business strategy with profitability. The best business strategy will be the least unprofitable, yes, but that doesn't mean that it guarantees that they will get enough revenue from that to make up their costs and actually turn a profit. The piece of data you're missing is that they're not profitable on weekends at the moment because they have too many cars to run and not enough drivers to service their customers. Raising prices will allow for improved supply and b…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 10:51 PM
1

You don't need to serve every potential customer to run a successful business. You just need enough to keep you going and growing. Rolex doesn't try sell to working class blokes who are fine with their Casios, and they still get by.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 08:33 PM
0

It's a special service, advertise it as such. Maybe ask them, "how much is your piece of mind worth?" to justify the higher price. Or be honest, "it's just as dangerous for our drivers as it is for you out there, we charge you more so we can pay them better, so you can both get home safe". Marketing is, if not a solved game, then certainly a manageable concern.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 08:22 PM
0

And you know this how, exatly? Magic? Charge the customers more and use that to pay the drivers more. It's not a guaranteed winning or losing proposition. Even in the face of price controls on taxi fares, weekends could be run as a loss leader for advertising.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 08:09 PM
0

Knowing beforehand is often enormously difficult. These guys have weekday traffic and weekend demand, but not enough drivers on the weekend. They might run their comapny into the ground for other reasons, but spending money on producing a guaranteed loser doesn't seem to be what their problem is right now.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:56 PM
-9

Yes, it is. It gives a firm understanding that there is no profitable market for the product as it exists. This isn't "how to guarantee profits", because you can't do that. This is "how to run a business without deluding yourself as to the value of your product".
/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:44 PM
-5

I'm well aware of that, which is why I never made claims of whether it would be profitable or not, only that they could fix the disparity between the number of customers and of drivers.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:32 PM
-6

The intermediate value theorem. Draw a line (one that goes forever in both directions) with one point above and one point below. Connect those points without lifting your pencil and you have to cross that line. Supply and demand are close enough to continuous for an approximation to within a penny or so, which is more than good enough for doing business. Applied in this situation in economics, the resulting value is known as the "market clearing price".
/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:22 PM
-12

There's a point where prices are too high to attract customers and another where wages are too low to attract drivers, yes. They'll meet somewhere in the midddle. Maybe it'll be too high to support a business, maybe not, but the problem at hand is entirely solvable.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:12 PM
-6

Or people named after Muppets.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:00 PM
-19

Sorry, I don't date men's rights activitsts.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 06:50 PM
-5

You poor thing, jumping into the middle of a conversation, taking sides by virtue of your utter ignorance of the topic, and someone thinks you're trying to participate. The horror your life must be. Would you like a tissue?
/r/MensRights28/12/14 06:32 PM
-21

Yeah because SheTaxi is the only company you could short, you cretin. Again with the complete absence of reading comprehension. It seems to be a distinct theme with you. Will your next demonstration of a lack of understanding of business be a trifecta or quadrillogy? I've lost count. And, oh noes, my imaginary internet points have dropped. The horrors. That must really mean something important. Like this sub throwing a passive-aggressive hissy fit because it can't handle being wrong about anythi…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 06:22 PM
-42

Aw, a "men's rights" thread crying about how men are so put upon because they'd be willing to work weekends but a company has a "women serving women" business model and won't hire men. And you think I'm sensitive for being generous enough with my time to point out the fundamental flaws in your argument. Projection much? At this point in the discussion I'm here for the entertaining hypocrisy and male tears. And maybe the remote chance you can be educated into some semblance of knowledge about bus…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 06:12 PM
-26

Businesses don't need to be publicly-held to run, dumbass. I'm saying the high number of customers relative to the number of service providers can be corrected with changes in prices. I made no prediction about its ultimate success or failure. Reading comprehension: try it. Have you seen my post history? Didn't you notice I didn't mention my company by name? Didn't you notice the unsubtle mocking of your lack of business understanding in suggesting that a new business with a high cost of entry c…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 06:02 PM
-45

It's up and running in NYC, as far as I know. I'm too busy running my engineering consulting firm to start a competitor. Tell you what, though, put together a business plan and PM it to me. If it's any good, I'll see about some seed funding and sign on as an advisor for a minority share, maybe put you in touch with a good banker.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:45 PM
-53

Yeah, not having enough drivers only in evenings and on weekends doesn't demonstrate any business success or demand for their product. How did you get so clever? Fetal alcohol syndrome?
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:35 PM
-79

Yes. It makes my dick so hard it drips precum. Does being disingenuous and over-sensitive make you feel better, or is it something you just can't control?
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:24 PM
-97

Mens rights' autism brigaide is out in full today, I see.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:14 PM
-57

Ah, "lol i troll u" nonsense. Isn't that special.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:01 PM
-64

It sure is nice when we have people who can predict with such certainty whether the makret clearing price will be high enough to merit staying in business or not. How many billons are you going to make shorting stocks this week with your amazing skill? For that must be your day job with such powers of forecast.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:00 PM
-77

Do you enjoy living your life in ignorance, or are you making a special effort for this particular circlejerk? Did you not notice that this story was a thinly veiled attempt to make their service seem more valuable to drivers? It seems to me they have a better grasp of supply and demand than you do.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 04:55 PM
-53

If they hired men, it would undermine their market niche of women drivers for women passengers.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 04:50 PM
-83

The only problem with this situation. Don't be an autist about this.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 04:49 PM
-58

They seek to provide a particular service to meet a particular demand. Having male drivers would completely ignore the market niche they've carved out.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 04:47 PM
-92

No. It's not "ironic", it's bad business. They simply refuse to raise prices and wages until the number of customers drops to meet the rising number of drivers. That's the only problem they have here.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 03:50 PM
-1

Because you're simply wrong.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 09:50 PM
-7

You're not terribly bright are you. His analysis of the situation is simply incorrect.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 09:14 AM
-7

Painfully obvious that he and you were not.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 08:28 AM
-2

No, the point is he's surprised by this behavior, and he shouldn't be.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 08:11 AM
-19

Yes. I know. And her value in the eyes of other girls reflects who she's fucking. You are not a man to her. You should not be surprised she's bragging to up her value to you.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 06:42 AM
-13

You became nonsexual to her when you allowed her to turn you into her girlfriend. How do you not understand this?
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 06:36 AM
-8

You're freaking out about her perception of her value. The quality of the guy she's fucking does reflect her value to other girls.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 06:25 AM
-3

No, the point is she wasn't bragging to a man, she was bragging to her girlfriend.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 06:05 AM
20

FYI: you became her girlfriend.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 05:04 AM
10

These aren't guidelines for living in blissful ignorance, or even for having a happy life.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 12:47 AM
15

Because he's wrong. There's quite a few people who could have been Jesus, and it's not clear whether the man the Bible speaks of is one of them, a mashup of several, or just a plausible fiction.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/14 10:21 PM
16

Dude's been kicked out of or banned from how many countries now, with how many more on the waiting list? That's some heavy shit for an international executive to deal with, much less a dating coach. Given enough pressure, anyone will fold. Dude has my sympathy. I will of course be denouncing him in public any time this comes up in a situation where real people know me, though. Gotta keep up plausible deniability.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/14 09:39 PM
22

I don't know if I would fuck a bitch who could grow a beard.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/14 06:04 PM
1

Yeah, but unlike those this one has a chance of being acted on.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 09:18 PM
4

The three step process for people who don't want to complicate things. Get in a comfortable position. Pay attention to your breathing for one slow, deep breath. After that breath is done, stop or keep going as long as you see fit.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 06:55 PM
1

Active rest is the shit, yo.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 06:15 AM
4

It's quite possible to brace incorrectly and still lift huge amounts of weight, hence the lordosis. And people who only back squat are typically shit at front squat tests. Don't confuse muscles for movements.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 06:07 AM
-1

The use of the safe word isn't the bad behavior I referred to. The wheedling is.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 08:54 PM
1

Pity I can't say the same about you, kiddo. I'd say I'm sure you'll eventually contribute something of value, but there's been no evidence of that so far.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 08:53 PM
-1

Yes, pathetic. For not realizing that how he did it involved a deeper game that he lost. The ends do not justify the means. Try reading comprehension once in a while, spaz, because this shit has already been covered.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 03:34 PM
1

You poor, stupid baby. All you could come back with is how you didn't like my tone. Do enjoy your temper tantrum.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 03:32 PM
1

If you want a rebuttal, you need to make valid points rather than simply throwing a hissy fit about questions that have already been answered, you retard.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 09:35 AM
1

Like the other guy, you're just pissing and moaning because you think my tone implied a quantitative argument, and since you claim you've read the rest, it should be quite clear that I'm not only making a qualitative argument, but also that I'm saying the important part is that OP failed to notice he fucked up. You're not only contributing fuck all to this conversation, you either lied about reading the rest of the convo or you're clearly too stupid to breathe.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 09:04 AM
-1

Speaking of nothing added... I've covered the topic with OP, apparently to his satisfaction, and I've covered it again in depth with another idiot, which conversation you've clearly failed to read. What makes you think you're so special that I should be interested in doing it again with you?
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 08:35 AM
-1

I'm sorry you're so thirsty that you want to live vicariously through someone else's sex life and can't see where he went wrong.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 08:09 AM
1

It's cute that you're still being defensive about this, even though you've come 95% over to my side, kicking and screaming though it has been as I've dragged you out of your autism. Let's see if we can't get that last 5%. Do you only take your car to the mechanic when the engine blows up or the wheels fall off? Preventative maintenance isn't just for cars. Sure the material in the sidebar can help you get your life back on track, but it's better not to let shit go bad in the first place.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 07:57 AM
1

So what if he fucked up, eh? It was just this one time, right? What happens if he doesn't realize he's fucking up and keeps doing it over and over? She didn't just try to manipulate him, she succeeded. He got a little sex for his trouble? Big deal. She learned he won't keep his word and that she could manipulate him with sex. And he was proud in his ignorance. You think this is about sex because you don't understand subcommunication. The classic example is asking a girl up to your flat to see yo…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 07:19 AM
1

So tell me, who is the one chasing in this scenario? You still think it's about sex. He turned a sex game into a relationship game and then continued to play it like it was a sex game, and lost the relationship game in the process. It's not that he fucked up that's the problem so much as it is that he, and you, were completely oblivious to the fact that he fucked up. You don't need to be perfect, but you ought at least to be aware of when you fuck up. The problem with your notion of "predictable…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 06:40 AM
2

Google the Gervais principle.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 06:28 AM
-1

You're not being particularly bright. Is this your version of "babby's first troll" or of "babby's first day on TRP"? She got him to relent to sexual activity, thereby going back on his word. It does not matter that she didn't get hers. She won and he lost. And he and you thought he had come out on top because you've decided the game he's playing is about getting sex instead of managing a relationship. You want to "balance your character out"? Learn to realize when you're wrong and how to take c…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 06:00 AM
-2

You are reacting to one instance like it is the cause to the end of the relationship. No, you're being oversensitive. Probably to the word "fuck". Here, I'll fucking say the next fucking sentence without it so you'll not have so fucking much trouble fucking understanding. It's not interrupting sex that's bad behavior, it's wheedling that's bad behavior.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 05:38 AM
0

He won one battle, ignoring how he set himself up for having to fight dozens of future battles. She just learned how easy it is to wheedle him out of his decisions. Show some fucking integrity and don't reward bad behavior.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 05:20 AM
-7

You won one battle, ignoring how you set yourself up for having to fight dozens of future battles. She just learned how easy it is to wheedle you out of your decisions. Show some fucking integrity and don't reward her bad behavior.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 05:20 AM
-13

Fucking pathetic. You can't even keep your word about "all sexual activity stops for the night" long enough to take a shower. And you presume to think this is a victory for you. You're her bitch and you can't even see it.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 04:42 AM
99

"Not all feminists are rabid man haters!" "If there was a bowl of M&Ms..."
/r/TheRedPill06/11/14 03:42 PM
23

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dog_and_Its_Reflection
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 05:25 AM
0

Why are you trying to reason with women about their emotions?
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 08:39 AM
1

Yup, going to continue abstaining from stupid contests. Does that make me in or out?
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 05:53 AM
1

The South American and African men I do business with always talk about how warm and pleasant American women are compared to their women at home. I doubt it's a purely economic thing, but also the value of novelty and a sexy accent.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/14 01:49 AM
1

Actually, they are free to shame you for it; to say, for example, you're not an attractive person for not liking what they are. They're not allowed to harass you about it, though, just as you're not allowed to harass someone for having hairy legs.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 06:53 PM
3

Anecdote isn't data.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 02:06 AM
3

Allegedly. Because it isn't validated by any other research, hasn't been replicated, and isn't something outside of normal expected variation. Sometimes you get anomalous results that look significant but really aren't. This is like looking at one rat out of dozens, noticing that it's albino, and claiming that rats are albinos. Hell, even the week-long period is suspicious since it suggests a regular cultural activity could be responsible.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 12:02 AM
6

It was a one day, transient spike that has not been replicated, and likely will remain that way becuase fluctuations in that range are normal. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1117056
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 09:39 PM
2

Androgens may be an effective treatment for that, since being male is a strong predictor of remission and those with the disease typically have low serum testosterone levels. "Just lift" might not be completely out of line since lifting improves men's hormone profiles. Not as much as exogenous testosterone, but still.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 05:43 AM
8

The crab bucket phenomena is also used as an excuse to ignore valid criticism.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 03:05 AM
4

Old adage? It's a Mencken quotation.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 05:27 PM
1

I would be surprised if obese girls were as well-socialized as hot girls, so I'm sure they'll be able to get the result they want from their data.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 11:10 PM
12

It's easy enough to get experienced emplyees to quit. Just don't increase their salaries. And if all you have is hot girls, they'll probably marry out of the professon fast enough anyway.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 03:05 PM
1

See a male-friendly therapist. Also, bond with your male friends. Do something difficult together.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 07:41 AM
11

They're not hamstering away their obesity, because that's something they have to do every day. You offended them by not taking full part in the office bonding ritual. It's like the guy who goes out drinking with you and then tells you he doesn't drink after you buy him a round. Saying "no" and then relenting would have been worse, though.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 03:35 PM
17

That's not far off the traits that are actually useful: intelligence and conscientiousness.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 03:33 AM
9

Hard times have historically driven people into marriage.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/14 03:28 PM
0

You only would call that "lionizing" if you were an idiot. There's nothing about how heroic she was for doing it or how she should be celebrated for it. Only that it happened. Clearly you're a fucking moron who can't use a fucking dictionary.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 12:57 PM
-1

Mentioning her military service once as background is "lionizing" now? K.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:40 PM
29

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 11:44 AM
1

We had to create a formal mentoring program because we found almost nobody looked for people to mentor, and no women and only a few men sought out mentors.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 08:45 PM
27

Shouldn't be that surprising since trans women outnumber trans men by around 3:1 even though there's about as many genderqueer men as genderqueer women.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 11:00 PM
0

Nice try.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 06:14 AM
0

I'm not full of shit, I just overestimated your reasoning skills. That means I expected you to be smarter.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 05:58 AM
0

Wow. You really are just that incredibly stupid, aren't you? So you're just whining about how you want the police to focus more on minorities because correlation for the sake of whining, eh? Nice try, but it's not quite that easy to mask your position. I've already explained my position several times, so rather than playing guessing games with you about what you're able to understand, how about you tell me what you think my position is. Also, I'm not Swedish. Or a European of any flavor, for tha…
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 05:47 AM
0

I'm also aware of the conclusions you're drawing. Pity you've made, as it has yet again become clear, no effort to understand anything of what I've said. Tell you what, go grab the data for your correlations, sit down with pencil and paper, apply the tools I've cited, and figure out a rough approximation of what just the wasted police resources will be by applying your "solution" compared to what the police are doing now -- you don't even have to think about the court costs and social implicatio…
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 05:12 AM
0

I'm aware of what correlation you're referring to.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 04:56 AM
0

You don't understand what the corrlation you're citing involves. Just waving your hands and saying "correlation" doesn't mean you get to use it whatever way you want.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 04:49 AM
0

I expect that people treat you like an idiot because you play blind deaf and dumb when people try over and over to explain things to you, and then, when they finally hit on a way, you blame them because you only just got it. I cited the principles: false positives, the conjunction fallacy, etc. They have standard definitions so feel free to look them up. This isn't scientific research that needs a collection of peer reviewed journal articles.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 04:36 AM
0

I'm writing in Swedish right now. Does that help you grasp how little validity your claims about your understanding have compared to the laws of probability you're intent on violating for the sake of maintaining your lack of comprehension?
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 04:20 AM
0

I'm not making assumptions. You're grotesquely ignorant of both the methods you're citing and the policies you're espousing. What you're "not afraid of" is punishing people who have done nothing but share the same heritage as a few criminals.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 04:03 AM
0

You quite clearly know fuck all about what you're talking about and are using "correlation" as an excuse to justify your particular agenda. To start, what you're doing is confusing my example about Muslims, who are are mentioned in the thread, with how things work when you try to analyze the influence of a relatively small portion of the population. Further, the criminal justice systems in those countries are absolutely not afraid of prosecuting "those people". Consider the disproportionate numb…
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 03:07 AM
1

Don't be ridiculous. Of course there is a problem with that. See back to my first fucking post about false positives.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 02:40 AM
6

Then there's this: How do I slut? I don't want to settle down at 28 without having had a regular dose of pre-wall alpha cock!
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 01:55 AM
1

The probability of any single condition cannot ever ever be less than the probability of that condition and another. The probability that someone is a criminal and a Muslim is necessarily never greater than the probability someone is a criminal, and can only be equal when the entire population is Muslim. Asserting otherwise is an instance of the conjunction fallacy, which is a violation of the laws of probability. It is so common a mistake that it actively needs to be guarded against. I am not b…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 05:57 PM
1

It's not "not all Muslims are like that" but "this involves so few Muslims that their race is incidental". And it's not minorities that are the issue, it's criminals. Going after minorities because some group of criminals are of that race is exactly the same piss-poor logic that feminists use in assuming men are rapists until proven otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 12:01 PM
5

You need to understand something about false positives. Even if 90% of these incidents are perpetrated by Muslims, it doesn't say anything about Muslims in general because there's such a low incidence of this sort of crime relative to the size of the Muslim population. Like blaming Italians for protection rackets in New York because the Mafia does those things and the Mafia is Italian, it's not simply racist, it's logically incoherent.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 09:46 AM
4

Do you not live somewhere you can carry a pistol?
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 12:48 AM
2

Won't work. Part of this bill explicitly notes consent can be revoked at any time.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 10:06 PM
7

"He turned off the camera and I told him no and then he kept going. *sob*"
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 10:06 PM
5

As someone whose mother was a Ford model, who frequently has shop girls say "oh, Jesus" or go zombie when I smile at them, and who never had anyone call me on my bullshit until I went on the internet where people couldn't see my face, this totally underplays the effects of being good looking, if anything.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 06:00 PM
0

You should go reread what I wrote, particularly the part about cats, so we can have a discussion instead of you attacking straw men and me rolling me eyes at you.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 09:25 AM
1

No, they're seeking it. Otherwise fat, poor, stupid, and living in a van down by the river could be the norm for high status men rather than a rare exception, if it happened at all. You're also having problems with logic. The particular fallacy you're guilty of is denying the antecedent. The metric wasn't that pants prove she's not a slut, but that shorts suggest she is a slut. The correct contrapositive would be non-sluts don't wear shorts. It's like if cats have four legs, anything that doesn'…
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 09:02 AM
1

And again you're confusing the exceptions for the rule. Because I'm feeling uncharacteristically patient I'll take the time this once to explain what you should have been able to figure out on your own. Athletes and lifeguards are typically very young and they don't wear their sports uniforms when they're not playing their sports. While there may be no technical reason not to wear shorts, there's no real reason to wear them either since you gain a lot in fashion and respectibilty and lose very l…
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 07:45 AM
0

You're looking for a good reason and there really isn't one any more than there is for the continued use of heeled men's dress shoes, which stayed the fashion in men's clothing beyond the point where they were necessary to keep your feet from going too far into stirrups. Children are more likely to outgrow their pants than wear them out so for a long time in just about every culture young men didn't typically get long pants until they stopped growing. Violating these traditions makes you look li…
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 07:16 AM
-1

As clever as you might think you're being, you're really just being disingenuous.The problem here is that you're looking for excuses to continue to be uncooth rather than dealing with social reality as it is. As unfair or uncomfortable as you might consider it to be, shorts have long been and still remain a pancultural symbol of childhood. If you continue to wear them as an adult outside of a very small set of specific conditions, it reveals immature socialization.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 06:59 AM
0

The point is a pair of light pants is not going to devastate you physically, and dogged persistence at choosing what you see as function over form shows willful ignorance of cultural history. Adherence to such tradition shows refinement and culture and maturity.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 03:15 AM
1

Your unwillingness to be educated about cultural norms doesn't reflect well on you when you participate in a forum of people who claim to be seeking status. A dogged desire to refuse to accept what is and hang on to what you want shows a lack of social understanding and a lack of self-awareness.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 03:14 AM
10

"If I had wanted to bargain for sex, I would have gone to a hooker."
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 10:28 PM
-1

Both road crews I drove past at lunch today were in long pants and long sleeves in 100+ degree weather. It's frankly foolish to go uncovered in those conditions.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 10:17 PM
-4

Yes, don't allow any interruption in the circlejerk of angry manchildren desperate for validation. The people who have gotten past the denial stage of grieving should be cast out!
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 08:31 PM
23

http://www.vkmag.com/magazine/brits_meisje_speelt_stofzuiger_voor_een_gratis_drankje/brits_meisje_speelt_stofzuiger_voor_een_gratis_drankje uncensored
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 07:04 PM
-13

You're probably autistic and think because sometimes appearances can be deceiving they usually are. Responsible people dress like adults. Irresponsible people dress like children.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 06:53 PM
-16

Sure, they're common in cultures where people refuse to put away childish things when they're grown.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 06:25 PM
-23

Shorts are for children. Men wear summer-weight pants and women wear dresses.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 05:16 PM
11

Hasn't exposure to entirely justified views so far out of the mainstream taught you to be careful about believing the consensus when it demonizes people? No. It has mostly given people here a sense of belonging. The willingness to explore new ideas objectively has to be educated into most people.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 11:42 PM
0

Oh pretty please? Can't you sense the deep connection we have? Me with the inflicting pain and you with the being understanding. What's the matter, honey, why won't you let me in? I promise what I want from you won't hurt but a little. ;)
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 04:58 PM
0

It's so damaging when my true beloved doesn't understand me. I suffer always from rejection. If you leave me, I don't know what I would do when I'm far too narcissistic to kill myself. Still, I only burn girls with cigars. Cigars. Cigarettes are not only plebian, they're too much like idealzed cishet white male penises and I've learned my lesson about oppression. Your curiosity enthralls me. Come with me and let us bond.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 04:46 PM
0

My heart aches that you, my true beloved, don't believe me. Come let us frollic among the pelts of the animals I've killed for our man love, daddy.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 04:34 PM
0

Mmm, yes, daddy, paddle my plump, boyish bottom for tacking squirrels to the ground with the staple gun and cutting them open to watch their insides wriggle. We both know that's what you want. Your denials only make my boy cock harder.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 04:27 PM
0

Why don't you tell me why you decided to focus on that one particular bit of my post history, then? It's certainly not the only fucked up thing I've admitted to here. Maybe we can help each other in a snuggle of love and sharing. Don't you want to show me I can trust you the way you love me? Tell me what's on your mind, darling.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 04:20 PM
0

Would you like to paddle my bottom? Is that where this is going? I have been a very naughty boy, so you needn't feel guilty about obsessing over this.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 04:14 PM
0

It probably comes from how I just can't deal with the outpouring of love from incredibly ignorant people like you on the internet. If only we could meet so you could suck the pain out of my balls, everything would he good again.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 04:04 PM
0

Aww, my very own stalker. How cute. I'm gratified you find me so intersting.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 03:56 PM
0

Believe whatever you like, kiddo. The truth will remain true regardless.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 03:25 PM
0

I am rather enjoying the battalion of unpaid interns fetching coffee and making copies. Enjoy your ignorance.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 03:10 PM
0

While the temper tantrum is entertaining, you're not helping your case, kiddo.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 02:58 PM
0

I've already given more hand holding than a competent person would need to revise their arguments in order to make a valid point, but you're going out of your way to show you're not competent to have this discussion.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 02:53 PM
0

You've used logical fallacies to try to expose hypocrisy, and failed. Get over it.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 02:41 PM
0

You didn't make a point, you tried to set fire to a straw man.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 02:23 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dichotomy Not all acts of stupidity are, or should be, illegal. Also, don't confuse social double standards with legal ones.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 11:34 PM
2

Any bets on whether TRP will break 60K subscribers today?
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 09:21 PM
6

Don't confuse aping status symbols with having actual status.
/r/AlreadyRed01/06/14 08:42 PM
2

There's always a bigger game.
/r/AlreadyRed30/05/14 11:38 PM
2

"Tell him or I'll give him the pics." You lack both insight and ingenuity.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 05:19 PM
2

Am I the only person who would have taken pics of the makeout and used them for blackmail?
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 03:51 PM
13

I think it might be good to have the occasional free-for-all thread with a theme like "where TRP philosophy is going wrong" or "female TRP lurkers, what are your thoughts about TRP as women?" the way /r/guns limits politics to one thread at a time to keep the forum from drowning in shit while still letting the kiddies splash a bit in the mud puddles.
/r/AlreadyRed26/04/14 03:28 AM
3

"Feminazis stole my ice cream"?
/r/RedPillBooks24/04/14 02:48 PM
2

MRAs always seemed like the male version of whiny feminists to me. TRP is the patriarchy.
/r/AlreadyRed29/03/14 01:33 AM
1

Loved his Violence: A Writer's Guide. If you're interested in street/social violence, Marc MacYoung is another name that's good to be familiar with. His website is excellent.
/r/RedPillBooks20/02/14 05:30 AM
-5

The problem is you're a member of the oppressor class. Your very existence is oppressive to the oppressed. Your interacting with such oppressed people is proof of your inherent desire to cling to that oppression. For the good of society, you should only date other oppressors: i.e. white, cis-genered males.
/r/AlreadyRed18/02/14 06:30 AM
6

Have you seen Kelly McGonigal's Ted talk on stress? http://www.ted.com/talks/kelly_mcgonigal_how_to_make_stress_your_friend.html Basically the negative effects of stress are the result of our conscious negative perception of our stress reactions. People who feel that stress causes a positive reaction which prepares them for action don't have the negative physiological and psychological effects of stress.
/r/RedPillBooks15/02/14 02:21 PM
4

Even including the "can't win if you don't play" reality, this seems pretty damned dubious. It's more likely that "I rarely get hit on" is followed by an unspoken "by men who are higher enough in status than me to even notice" in much the same way that "women get sexually rejected a lot, too" is followed by the unspoken "once the relationship is already established." This is just more female solipsism.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 03:02 AM
20

It's a security deposit on her virginity back from the era of dowries. You pump and dump a cherry and she'd have a far far harder time convincing the next guy that the baby's his, so the ring adds to the dowry pile that compensates for her being a drain on the man's resources. Women who demand a big ticket ring these days typically want the perks and status of that tradition without the concomitant sacrifices on their part.
/r/AlreadyRed12/02/14 12:17 AM
0

I think this is a good way to start bringing back debtors' prisons. With any luck we'll be locking up women who default on their credit cards next.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 07:03 PM
0

If you have sole legal authority over whether a child is aborted, you get to foot the bill if you choose not to abort and the father chooses not to participate.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 04:03 PM
1

Change her mood and do something life-affirming. Dance with her and then fuck her unconscious.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 09:43 AM
21

The guy has no excuse. There's been effective hormonal birth control for more than half a century now. If he didn't want to get someone pregnant he should have been... What do you mean that's only for women?
/r/TheRedPill06/02/14 05:35 AM
-1

A subreddit dedicated to women proto bull dykes womyn who have ruined their appearance shown the patriarchy what's what like this.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 06:30 PM
8

Who's Felicia Day?
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 05:39 PM
0

There's nothing worth discussing because, since it relies on fallacies, the piece doesn't really say anything objective and it relies on the truthfulness of the underlying idea — that shit tests exist — to give the speculation about motives its truthiness. The bad writing is just the peanuts on the shit sundae.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 06:56 PM
0

Are you out of your fucking mind? Aside from attempting to drown the reader in shitty writing, he added nothing to this topic but wild speculation about motives "supported" with fallacies like no true Scotsman, slippery slope, and false dichotomies.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 05:59 PM
2

So he just discovered shit tests.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 04:04 AM
1

Amazon has a huge, ready-built audience. Sometimes it's worth paying for access to that and fighting about whether something violates the contract that's used to allow access.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/14 10:36 PM
4

This is not a free speech issue unless you plan on having the state pass laws demanding the silence of one side or the other. It's a business concern. Sure, Amazon probably rolled over too fast to these pogues, but they listen to their cusomers and they do have a lot of customers. This sort of thing is great advertising for these sorts of products, though. I didn't even know about this guy ten minutes ago and now I want to give him some of my money. Now that I think about it, I'll write Amazon a…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/14 05:15 PM
2

Sugarhill's prenup seems to state they have to actually be together in person one night per week, rather than, for instance, conducting their relationship over Skype. This may be her requirement rather than his.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/14 10:40 AM
20

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." -- H. L. Mencken
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 05:44 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictional_portrayals_of_psychopaths
/r/RedPillBooks30/01/14 07:39 AM
3

Reddit is 75% male, though. SRS has a distinctly more female demographic than reddit does in general.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/14 06:06 PM
26

You should be ashamed of dating someone so old.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 07:39 PM
29

That is the difference between disciplining people and being a bully. Bullies stop when they get bored.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 03:07 AM
1

Grow up.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 12:25 AM
1

Already covered in the moass of retarded posts and my responses to them. What makes you special that I should explain it again to you?
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 07:32 PM
1

You still gotta get off, and regardless of how you may think you perceive it, every time you get pussy, it costs you. Either in money or in time and energy and effort. Putting a dollar ammoint on it just simplifies the process. MGTOW is fine for some, but not everyone has given up because they don't like how the game is played.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 07:13 PM
2

Of course it is currency. That's how prostitution works.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 07:01 PM
2

I'm pretty sure that's satire. Why go through all that and not leave contact info if you were serious?
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 06:10 PM
0

Well, good luck on that hamster wheel, kiddo.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 10:22 AM
1

Go back and re-read my first post. You'll see something very special there.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 09:43 AM
1

Yes, I know you're still parroting that incorrect mythology. It's not actually helping you.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 09:29 AM
1

I already have explained it. No matter how much you might desperately want a Ferrari, odds are you can neither afford one nor find one to steal. It takes absolutely zero willpower to control your craving for a Ferrari. And I don't think willpower is useless. It's just demonstrably a short term phenomena and isn't a reliable mechanism for achieving long term goals.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 09:19 AM
1

I understand your argument. You're just stuck on a cognitive issue you think is a semantic issue. Again, I'm sorry you're so willing to isolate yourself from uncomfortable information just because it's not what you're already certain of.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 09:09 AM
1

I'm sorry that unfamiliar truths are so hard for you to accept.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 08:59 AM
1

So the reason you don't have a Ferrari is that you're exercising your willpower to prevent you from buying it, eh? Willpower comes into play only at the extremes of action and decision making. When you're normally competent, you're not exercising willpower. If you set up and implement a plan within your competence that limits your choices, no exercise of willpower is required whatsoever. You just simply don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 08:50 AM
1

smh
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 08:43 AM
1

Sure thing, kiddo. Keep telling yourself that.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 08:36 AM
37

Her: Okay, are you paying? Are you going to sleep with me?
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 02:25 AM
0

smh
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 01:08 AM
0

Yeah, nobody but the current best science on the subject agrees with me. Hell of a martyr's position that, not suffering for my absence of failure and all. smh
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 06:03 PM
0

You're not just wrong here, you're willfully ignorant. Enjoy your martyrdom.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 04:27 PM
0

You are simply wrong. Willpower is the ability to continue on when things seem impossible, it is not the ability to do regular shit day in and day out. Willpower is limited and fleeting and therefore ineffective at solving this sort of problem. You structure the plan to eliminate tempting options that allow failure and you implement the plan when you're not stressed, eliminating the necessity of using a precious resource like willpower on bullshit like losing weight. See Baumeister and co.'s wor…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 04:13 PM
0

You are free to disagree if you like, but you are neither a representative sample nor an objective observer. Have you considered giving control of your money and car keys up to someone else overnight so you simply don't have the option to get that baconator? Or making the pain of not losing weight greater by, say, betting your friends that you'll lose 10 lbs in three months or you'll eat a tin of dog food in front of them? Pure willpower is a poor solution to the problem you face because willpow…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 02:53 PM
-1

You are confusing sedentary and lazy. There's a difference between doing nothing else because you're thoroughly occupied and doing nothing regardless. Your "key" to being motivated to be healthy is more to value health more than the cost of achieving health. That's as much of a tautology as quoting the thermodynamics of this, though. Artificially increasing that cost by ladling false or misleading information on top of people's ill health isn't helping the situation. As I noted earlier, people w…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 04:39 AM
0

You can only really automate relatively easy things. And doing boring, difficult shit for 8-10 hours a day in an office is extremely psychologically stressful. You're confusing being sedentary with being lazy here. You're also confusing ignorance and priorities with laziness. The guy I responded to initially is just parroting the unfortunately bad contemporary diet advice that "everyone knows", which when followed to the letter frequently produces poor results with an extraordinary amount of eff…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 01:37 AM
-4

Just trying to "eat less calories" actually ends up causing people to gain more weight in the long run. Per a study recently mentioned in /r/science. Because of the complex interaction of, among other things, food reward mechanisms, fat storage and breakdown, and the effects of catabolic and stress hormones in general, it turns out that people have to build patterns of healthy behavior and abandon unhealthy ones as well before they can take advantage of that simple thermodynamic fact. And as peo…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 12:12 AM
-3

Uh, yes it is. Actually, it's not. People with measurably stronger willpower only manage their weight marginally better on average than people with shitty willpower. Willpower being a finite and easily-depleted resource, it's actually kind of dumb to expend it on trying to eat less. Instead, you use it to construct an environment that encourages healthy habits and discourages unhealthy ones. So it's planning, not willpower, that's really important. Per Baumeister, etc.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 10:35 PM
0

Ah. My apologies, then. We got around to discussing how the article is more about how women want their men to make them feel in the relationship -- safe, loved, special, wanted, etc. -- but that men shouldn't take it to be an instruction manual because it wasn't really written for men. And we did it in the most insulting way possible, which is why I decided to be antagonistic to you as well.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 05:41 AM
1

Not my fault you decided to stop reading where you did.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 05:12 AM
1

Helps that I'm not a troll and you're an idiot.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 05:03 AM
1

I don't think Well, this part was accurate.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 05:00 AM
0

NAWALT Like I said, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 01:56 AM
1

You're the moron who thinks this is an instruction manual for men rather than a set of reasonable emotional guidelines for women. The article in summary: "your man should make you feel loved, special, wanted, safe and feminine". Your utter refusal to understand that there is a discrepancy between what a woman feels and what a man says and does thanks to your patent hyperliteralism is a pathetic misunderstanding of the basic principles espoused here. The article was written for women. Not men.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 12:47 AM
-5

And again we see the "women should be like men" bullshit your head is full of, moron. Nice to see you've learned nothing on this forum.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 12:39 AM
-4

I explained that the article is for women, not for men, you retard. You didn't do shit, kiddo.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 12:22 AM
0

It's not about encouraging her to be crazy, but about accepting that all women are crazy, that as a man you have to manage that crazy, and that she brings things to the relationship that make it worthwhile to do so -- and if she doesn't, why the hell are you in the relationship? The fact that she's crazy shouldn't unsettle you because that would make you lose some of your credibility as a man. Remember this article was written for women, not for men. It's about what they're feeling in a relation…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 10:19 PM
1

Oh, goody. I'm talking to a moron.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 07:13 PM
0

No.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 06:07 AM
31

I'm fond of "emotional tampon".
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 05:52 AM
1

It's not a shit test. Providing for children and protecting investments are legitimate concerns. Contracts like this just give you specific recourse for mediation or litigation should something go wrong.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 05:45 AM
13

There is no reciprocity. Men love women. Women love children. Children love hamsters. Hamsters don't love anyone.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 09:53 PM
5

This is more, "you're obviously low value and low status, be happy you got anything at all".
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 09:50 PM
6

So the guy gets sole custody of the kid in this "compensated for giving up her prime earning years to have a kid" scenario and there will be mandatory paternity testing, right? I'm not entirely sure how this particular agreement is supposed to work, but getting things settled in pre and postnups is hardly a bad idea.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 03:11 AM
10

If you don't change you, you'll end up dating the same girl in a different person suit.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 07:56 AM
-6

Oh, you got me good, man. I cart my groceries home in a rusty Radio Flyer wagon. How'd you see through me?
/r/askTRP23/12/13 04:19 AM
3

Making it opt-out for the guys but opt-in for the girls is a rather sleazy way of dealing with consent and privacy issues. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/16/technology/default-choices-are-hard-to-resist-online-or-not.html?_r=0
/r/TheRedPill23/12/13 03:55 AM
-2

That would be his ignorance of his worth shining through. Did you forget his reaction to my post when he realized he might have 19 year old hottie coeds available to him? He was free to say something like, "no, I don't want to bang a feisty red headed soccer player in her dorm room," to me. But he didn't. Mid-30s submissive, willing women are hard to avoid hitting while swinging dead cats if you're a fairly well-off 36 year old guy like OP.
/r/askTRP23/12/13 01:01 AM
-8

It doesn't make sense because you're extrapolating haphazardly from your prejudices about relationships and how you think people in this subreddit behave. She is not less of an agent than he is. No less capable of deciding what she's willing to put up with in her relationships than he. But on the dating market he's valuable and she's not. Her submissive behavior toward him suggests she understands this, but it's clear from his desire to know what his dating strategy should be that he lives in ig…
/r/askTRP23/12/13 12:50 AM
-9

If you say so.
/r/askTRP23/12/13 12:28 AM
-11

No. I didn't miss the point. You're willfully butchering the metaphor to suit your prejudices. Best of luck to you in your witch hunt, though. I'm sure you'll find plenty of compatriots. In the mean time, I'll enjoy my Ferrari. :)
/r/askTRP22/12/13 11:13 PM
-11

Suppose you have a Toyota but want a Ferrari, and as it happens you can afford a Ferrari. Why should you listen to the people who tell you, "you can't afford a Ferrari. Just trust me, don't check your bank account"? Haters gonna hate.
/r/askTRP22/12/13 10:32 PM
2

If you're into physical culture at all, you might also be interested in Dan John. The thing he talks about that's relevant here is that while balancing his own idea of the big four pieces -- work, play, rest, pray -- can create a fulfilling life, to become exceptional you have to reject balance. For a while at least.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/13 08:19 AM
1

35 year-old separated professional women are the sort of women I go into business with, not the sort of women I get in relationships with. I might sleep with them, but only if nobody else was available, and if I did, I wouldn't admit it to anyone I know. While a meaningful relationship with a high-value guy your own age isn't completely unthinkable, the guys successful, attractive single women in their 30s date are usually either older and successful silver fox types or artists, musicians and co…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/13 06:47 AM
-10

Take the opportunity to be entitled yourself and play sugar daddy to poor, hot college girls for a while. "Christmas bills a bit overwhelming? Attractive, generous white male in his mid 30s seeks an athletic natural redhead coed for a discrete exchange of favors. Responses without a recent picture will be ignored." And see how far you can push your post-wall fuck toy before she leaves. You'll probably have to work up to having her fuck a dog on camera or whore herself out on a street corner for …
/r/askTRP21/12/13 09:05 PM
1

Only, I think, if children are permanently out of the picture. Would a guy who wants a family and has a lot of options when it comes to mates settle for a girl he'll have trouble trusting when she says "of course it's yours" or whose biological clock is ticking like cannon fire?
/r/askTRP21/12/13 08:01 PM
1

It doesn't sound, though, like either of you is trying to give up your needs for the other. He might be trying to manipulate you to sate his narcissism, but he might also be trying to shame you into action (going back to school, perhaps) by holding your hand for everything while telling you how smart you are. If he doesn't do this to your mother or brother (and so far it sounds like he doesn't), I'd suspect shaming. He may not even be doing it consciously.
/r/askTRP21/12/13 07:47 PM
1

You're not reflecting. You're wallowing and seeking validation.
/r/askTRP21/12/13 07:03 PM
1

If you're trying to educate yourself, hiding in a corner with a very few guys at your level is almost certainly the wrong way to approach things. You miss out on the mentors who have already achieved the things you want as well as the students who will force you to better understand the principles so you can explain them.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 10:37 AM
-1

People only get to be choosy when they have options. For you that means being social and ambitious and masculine, even if you're in a relationship. For her that means being a young girl. Also, you're not a good enough writer to get me to want to wade through a whiny, self-absorbed wall of text like that. I could barely bring myself to skim it. Get over yourself and kill your darlings.
/r/askTRP21/12/13 10:28 AM
7

Even though there's a lot of "how to score as much pussy as possible" going on in this forum, the red pill thing is more "this is how the world seems to work" than "this is how you should live your life." Men and women pair up primarily to make babies. Things that make good babies are mostly the same things that make men and women attractive to each other. Good babies are made by younger women in comfortably-wealthy and socially-stable living situations with men who aren't too old to help raise …
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 09:23 AM
2

That doesn't sound codependent. It sounds like your father is disappointed in you. I'd see about getting him to help with your business. At the very least it should give him some perspective about what you're doing with your life. Also, consider roommates.
/r/askTRP21/12/13 07:43 AM
3

"True discrimination"?
/r/TheRedPill20/12/13 05:15 AM
3

That's the Forer effect. A book on cold reading is probably a better introduction to its application.
/r/askTRP20/12/13 02:40 AM
1

Not really relevant, unless you consider unsubtle trolling "relevant." The presumption in that seems to be that uniformity, not equality, is what's desirable, that people should be socially engineered to achieve that end, and that the authors and their compatriots should be the people who decide what the ends and means should be. Now, given the slightest provocation, most people will whine endlessly about how hard their life is. Added competition for jobs or classroom seats is one thing, but, li…
/r/TheRedPill19/12/13 09:30 PM
4

Interesting case study. I wonder how it'd go if they switched roles.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/13 05:53 PM
-4

The person who spends the most time with a child is the most likely abuser. Once you control for this, it turns out that men are about 50% more likely to abuse children than women -- women being the primary caregiver something like 90% of the time, but being responsible for about 70% of the abuse. While not particularly endearing, it is far from the 10x to 100x occasionally claimed.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/13 05:33 PM
0

I posted it. Hope you don't mind. /r/OkCupid/comments/1t83i9/a_friend_of_an_acquaintance_dodged_this_bullet/
/r/TheRedPill19/12/13 04:29 AM
1

I don't drink, either. Hell, I don't even eat dairy or wheat so as to avoid the trace opioids. I've never had to go much further than "because I don't want to. Are you going to be weird about this?" to explain myself. However, social drug use is the rule most places. If you don't want to deal with it directly, you can offer a more appealing alternative when someone says "Let's get drinks." like "No. I'm hungry. Let's get food." Or you can go and order a coke, a tonic and lime, or an Arnold Palme…
/r/askTRP19/12/13 02:58 AM
4

I completely forgot she existed.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 10:59 PM
10

To be fair, she's better than Kristen Stewart. Not that I can think of anyone else to put on that list, but still.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 10:55 PM
1

That's why you don't tell her anything about it.
/r/askTRP14/12/13 07:40 PM
1

Encourage your girlfriend to fuck your friend. Then you'll be even. Don't involve his wife. She's already fine with what happened.
/r/askTRP14/12/13 12:06 PM
2

Before you go blaming your father for not being perfect in hindsight, think about the good he did do by you and about all the things you realized later that you yourself fucked up and couldn't do anything about. Use that to help yourself understand that he did the best he could with the information available to him at the time. As did you. If you start whining to him about how he didn't teach you red pill values, you haven't swallowed the pill. Rather, you're using the pill to portray yourself a…
/r/askTRP12/12/13 06:39 PM
2

Any experience in doing AIWB holsters? I'm due for a new carry holster in a month or so and I like your no-nonsense approach but I'm not fond of using prototype holsters.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 08:22 PM
-3

My mom and sister are also sluts. Maybe not so much as yours since me and my siblings are clearly related to the guy who married mom, but mom was a party girl in the 1970s and sis dropped out of high school to fuck for meth for a few years.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 06:07 PM
3

You should. Also singing and poetry. Aside from attracting women's attention, art is a great way to occupy your mind when you need a break from working on something serious--i.e. something that puts food on your table and a roof over your head.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 01:34 AM
2

But also talk to a lawyer and find out how expensive a divorce will be for you and what you can do to improve your position -- hiding assets, digging up dirt on your wife, etc. Expect the best, prepare for the worst.
/r/askTRP22/11/13 10:09 AM
1

Tell yourself "relax, she's just a girl" then try moving forward. If even that's beyond you, practice just talking to people more.
/r/askTRP13/11/13 02:15 PM
4

I don't see what the problem is here. They pretty clearly identified the actual cause of the preference: that people like porn that focuses on the gender they prefer. Straight girls like gay porn because it focuses on the guys and don't like straight porn because it focuses on the girls. Only one person stooped to the naturalistic fallacy of declaring that what they don't like is bad, and that was in regard to doing it for money.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/13 05:41 PM
17

I wouldn't.
/r/askTRP09/11/13 09:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter