TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fungo_bat Archive

View 3 posts and 80 comments by fungo_bat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I have done some real research on the issue. While I am red pill for my rights, I am not a fucking sycophant either. My gripe with 4th wave feminism is that they believe they need to turn the tables on men and make us oppressed as a way of making it equitable for the years of mistreatment among women. I fight that ideology. At the same time I don't believe in turning the tables. I do believe in equality, I do believe women deserve equal treatment under the law and have right to their spaces as d…
/r/MensRights05/09/23 08:39 PM
0

Are fucking kidding me? This is about mens rights and the real struggles we are going through. Its bad enough these mother fuckers have infiltrated women's spaces and furthered their rage toward us. I don't think we need to poison the pond by letting this shit in the club house.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 05:11 PM
2

I see a guy wearing womens clothes, I assume that he identifies as woman and will go militant if we don't use his preferred pronouns, shit like ze/zek and zir which are shit some rot pocket just made up. I am not going to lie, if see a guy in a dress I am going to think he is freak.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 12:48 AM
1

This lady yet probably has no problem with transgenders now basically encroaching on their rights in direct contradiction to their 2nd wave feminists such as Mary Daly and Janice Raymond.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 07:15 PM
1

I have done some research into 2nd waive feminism and two prolific authors of the era 60's-70's are Mary Daly and Janice Raymond. I would describe this new post feminism as a clusterfuck. It actually reverses 2nd waive feminist thought on gender roles, as it relates to the transgender movement. Second waive feminist like Janice Raymond wrote a book on the subject called the "Transexual Empire, the making of the She-Male" in the 70's. Finding this book is actually not easy as the globalists I bel…
/r/MensRights19/08/23 06:05 PM
3

I wish I knew the answer. When I was falsely accused at work, I did get an attorney. He told me that for one the false accusers would have nothing to go after. He told me even if I won, I would not have been guaranteed a large payout. More like I would have been lucky if they had to pay the legal fees, but in reality I would have. He said the last thing that hit home. He said, since it happened in the workplace and if I wanted to keep it under the downlow as in not show up on future background c…
/r/MensRights19/08/23 05:26 PM
1

I would expect nothing less coming from the communist rag Politico. This is the same rhetoric Hitler used to blame the jews for all of societies' problems.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 09:29 PM
4

I think the whole feminist movement is purposeful driven to tear down the fabric of society. Its about weakening and destabelizing society. It does two things. One is that it removes the father and we see in inner cities where there are a lot of low income single mothers with multiple kids from different fathers, what a disaster those places are. Places like Baltimore, Soutside Chicago and Detroit are just as dangerous as Sadr City Iraq. There is complete lawlessness there. Next there is this id…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 04:27 AM
4

He sure was. Yeah there are people who will think he did what he was accused of.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 03:06 AM
2

Also there is the issue that now even the slightest thing like an arrest, even if not guilty is put out on the internet forever. That's a huge problem these days. This potentially shuts a lot of doors in life now. It used to be you could mask this stuff with some effort in the past. Potential employers would have to go and pull records at individual jurisdictions. Now all they have to do is just have a subscription to one of those sites that pulls any electronic record on your life in one consol…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 02:51 AM
8

A US supreme court judge was accused, so I don't think anyone is immune from a false accusation.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 02:32 AM
4

I am glad to see a judgement like this. I wish I had a route to sue my false accuser, granted mine was not a criminal accusation. It was a baseless BS one at work. I think false accusers should get the same type of punishment as what would be given for someone guilty of the actual crime. I am actually surprised in Minnesota, a super Marxist state would return this. Hope more of this thing is to come.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 02:31 AM
1

Technically no, they can't take away consent afterwords. The problem is nothing stops them from lying their fucking ass off after the fact that they said no before or during. Then its up to the investigators, prosecutors and ultimately a judge and jury to decide who they will believe. In that case they will use your words in the investigation against you. If you lie and they have one shred of evidence that is contrary, than they crucify you in court. The key thing, if accused and under investiga…
/r/MensRights20/05/20 03:29 AM
3

I sure hope so too. I think that needs to start happening in full force now. With this Meetoo garbage, these bitches need to understand full well penalties for crying wolf.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 08:34 PM
7

Yeah there are no reasons fake this shit /s Lets see what are reasons women make fake accusations. They have post sex regret and now need to become victim This ensures they can't get fired from a job if they might be laid off They have emotional problems and want to project their misery onto others They have self esteem issues, self victimization turns a frog into a princess They can be just simply a viscous vindictive bitch using their pussy as a weapon.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:04 AM
9

Maybe this is how we sane laws back in place. If enough politicians start getting accused including female ones, maybe they will decide the current laws are very lop-sided and opt to change them. One can only wish. I do find the irony in an HR exec of all people being accused of this. I wonder how many people she shit canned over false accusations?
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:17 AM
2

GOOD! I hope more suits like this keep coming. I hope at some these suits reach the work place and crush an HR manager for jumping the gun on an accusation.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:10 AM
1

I hope she gets the full 32 years. She should be executed, IMO. That is the punishment false accusers need.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 07:57 AM
1

That's why I said maybe. I agree men are more disadvantaged especially and gets worse as clock keeps tickin'.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 09:27 PM
3

My response would be. I did not realize getting married was purchasing a high priced whore. What will you do to give me the equitable ROI? Will you make sure you put out on a regular basis and provide the comfort and pleasures I want? What do you offer in return for said investment? Do I get refund on the contract for all matters given if you fail to perform said scope of work? What is your annual maintenance cost? Do you breakdown every two minutes, requiring more money wasted on? Since this in…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:09 AM
1

I honestly do not think there are anymore, TBH. I mean in the thirty years ago, maybe. Now the coin has flipped. Woman claim they make less than men in the same job. They don't quantify that with, longevity, performance or the man may have a specific desired skill set that commanded higher pay. If man and a woman commit the same crime with similar circumstances, in many instances the man will get a harsher sentence. In the universities, woman are given more preferential treatment. A professor mi…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 12:12 AM
5

Fuck that's horrific. How can women read something like that and not empathize Some of them are depraved and have deep seeded emotional issues. My guess is a lot of them have daddy issues. They bought in hook line and sinker that all men are these aggressive pervasive sexual deviants. Then many of them further ingrained their thoughts by indoctrination at their universities, listening to dribble from extremist nut cases in groups who basically convince them that they are always a target from the…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 07:30 PM
2

The irony is if you don't mansplain it to them, you end up doing it anyway over a thousand e-mails.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 06:19 PM
3

I hate that fucking word. I have been accused of that to explain complicated things to people and one was a female.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:05 AM
7

Yup, all these feminist hags do not want equality. They want the situation reversed. They want to be the oppressors now. Not to political or outside the scope of mens rights. But I am finding that is the agenda of a lot of these SJW movements and causes for the so called disenfranchised groups. They don't want equal rights at all. They want more rights! They want the scales tipped in their favor. They want to be the ones to do what they feel what was done to them in the past. They think that if …
/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:16 PM
3

Its still there.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 08:53 AM
3

Pretty much. An article 15 is probably not goina happen anyway in this political climate of two certain senators who would assume have an innocent person hang. Any sexual act as a military member is probably going to an article 32 hearing if accused, unless you are being accused in the civilian population. I hear, if they can leave it to the civvies, versus requesting jurisdiction, they will nowadays absolving them of any backlash if the case does not go the way of two above senators. Here is th…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 06:37 AM
1

I don't think it's unreasonable for people (mostly women) to say "sexual advances in the workforce are not okay". Except the problem now is what she can construe as a pervasive sexual advance. Pretty much anything she can claim made her uncomfortable can be a sexual advance. It could be a legit complaint or not. The supposed pervasive pervert could have no idea anything he is doing can be construed as a sexual overture. She can think you biting your pen is sexual and complain. You sit in a chair…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 06:09 AM
2

That's the whole problem here. What qualifies harassment in the first place. Meriam-Webster defines it as: the act or an instance of harassing, or disturbing, pestering, or troubling repeatedly; persecution: She sued her boss for sexual harassment. Repeatedly being the key word. That's the problem now, is anything can be construed as a sexual advance now. If she complains they have to take her serious, even if she is a complete delusional fucking nut case.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 05:58 AM
36

As much as I would think this has a good intent. It wont work for the variety of reasons as already mentioned. What if you sign it before hand and drink some booze before the sex? Or what if she claims she decides she did not want to do it after signing it? They can always use the "her consent can change at anytime before or during the intercourse." Too many problems here. I would say at least the last part of the card is good advice. SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTH! SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTH! SHUT YOUR F…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:40 AM
8

Hopefully there is a huge lawsuit against that fucking bitch. She should owe him a portion of her paycheck until she is old and dead.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 02:23 AM
3

The Onion is a more reliable news source than this rag called vice. The onion is a parody!
/r/MensRights04/12/17 02:20 AM
2

Its hypocritical, that is obvious. Through the years I have heard girls chatting about shit at work, if the guys were having similar conversations they would have been lit up for inappropriate conversations. The school girls all talking about their man they got it in on with after the night out. They have no issues talking about, "you should have seen that ass on him!" If a guy were to say at work, "man that girl last night had a nice ass and fresh tits." Bammm! Straight HR he would go! Also I h…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 02:06 AM
1

Read your company's sexual harassment policy sometime. Unless they have not updated it in a over decade. It probably says something to the effect, Any action or gesture, verbal or nonverbal whether overt or unintentional, if that action makes the other person uncomfortable can be grounds for a sexual harassment complaint That right there is paraphrasing policies for two companies I have worked for. Essentially it means anything that another person can find as a sexual overture,t hey can make a c…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 11:48 PM
1

I was looking more for examples of people that had been fired for simply looking at someone wrong. ME!! Long read here where I explained all of the details from start to finish. TLDR: Four unattractive women claimed I stared at them in the boob and crotch area during the first two days of onboarding. That was enough to be fired over. Plus they made other claims that because I was chewing on a coffee stir stick as a nervous twitch was a sexual overture. They claimed that because I was leaning bac…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 11:44 PM
6

That will be discriminatory to the lesbians, transgenders, asexuals and transpecies. So instead we will need a gender neutral robot.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:48 AM
29

Yeah pretty much. I am sure someone has been fired because some girl did not like how some guy sounded and it made her uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:41 AM
1

How bout I take whatever treadmill is available? Sometimes when the gym is busy there maybe only one available and if so that's the one I am going to take. Bitch fuck off. Now that we live in a world with the LBGT-MNOPQRST! How do you know if the chick behind you is not checking out your ass? If you are an ugly hag they probably aren't, straight male or Lesbian!
/r/MensRights01/12/17 03:47 AM
165

You don't even have to touch either. If they think you just looked at them is a sexual way they can get you shit canned.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:41 AM
32

As twisted and fucked up this world is. I can honestly see some hag do that as well. I could see a future work place where all of the guys only interact with the female employees on a very limited level so they don't get lit up by the nebulous bogus claims. Then the bitches will realize they are not being treated like one of the guys. Then they will say being segregated like the 60's. And now you will be guilty of discriminating against them. Either you hang out with them and risk being accused …
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:37 AM
2

You bet they fucking can! They don't even have to accuse you of the serious acts either. All they have to do is make up shit that you did something to make them uncomfortable. Now almost every sexual harassment policy out there, states any verbal or non verbal gesture whether you knew did it or not, is SH as long as it made the other person uncomfortable. Any bitch now can say you did anything to make her bitch ass uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:48 AM
1

Very unlikely to happen, unless you had some concrete proof of them making a false claim. Especially now with many company sexual harassment policies that are vague and subjective where almost anything can be construed as pervasive behavior as long as the accuser can assert that whatever you did made them uncomfortable in sexual manner. Don't look at them in the eyes the entire time, bam sexual harassment. Look in their eyes too long she thinks you are staring her down. She does not like the way…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:14 PM
1

I just read an excerpt of that Brady case. Its tragic that we have gone from there to where we are at now. That case and others like it, its a no brainer that a constant barrage of actions from one to the other would be a real case of sexual harassment. What pisses me off is this, "well she is uncomfortable by something you probably had no idea you were doing." "So that's good enough for us to let you go." And of course what sucks is how shielded these companies are now. They have almost no pena…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:34 PM
1

Its like the damn Twilight Zone.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 10:58 PM
1

Pretty much and you have no idea when you can be plucked off. You probably have a higher chance of a false accusation at work than a disgruntled active shooter.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 10:35 PM
3

That sucks, yup I know, since I have been there. Not only is this a men's rights issue its a workers rights issue as well. Now as long as an HR manager goes by the vague company standards as long as they can say they reasonably took action as they were required under their own rules, the company is covered. We have little to recourse against them, such as a fair process. They can say they acted within the bounds of their policies. HR gets a complaint, HR manager investigates if there is any vali…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 09:25 PM
1

Pretty much, here is the irony. They did not have to pay much at all. I had left a previous company after they lost a government contract and gave me the option to be laid off or be relocated. I opted to leave since I had that new job lined up. The irony is that most of the unemployment was paid by my previous employer a major defense contracting firm over the new company. The new company only had to pay maybe like at most 5 dollars a month. The way it works at least in my state, is that they lo…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 07:18 PM
1

Not defending them at all but sometimes trousers can bunch up to look like you have an erection. That was my counter argument actually to them. I asked each one of them if they could tell the difference between loose bunched up pants and a hardon. I essentially started out asking them what their qualifications were in being able to tell if pants were just being bunched up or I had a hardon. They tried to say they just knew. Then I asked if they could describe to all of us what the difference was…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 06:58 PM
2

It never even occurred to me that there was motivation - just feminist-induced paranoia and misperception. That could be, not denying that's a possibility. I find it funny that ugly women can have those paranoia's. Unless their real paranoia is that their faces are so unpleasing that the harassment is finding them ugly. Two of them I forgot what they even looked like until I found their facebook page. They were basically insignificant to me. The black lady I remembered what she looked like, beca…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 06:43 PM
2

They probably did not care what the reason was as the other guy stated. its all about the bottom line and the greed of the company that did not want to pay if they don't have to. Here in the US the way it works at least in most areas, if you get terminated over with what they refer to a as a "just cause." An example being like committing a criminal act at work or blatantly violating a company policy, such as sexual harassment. They can challenge that they had a right to terminate you. If they su…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 04:49 PM
3

so you were idle for a minute and nearly had your life ruined because a few women felt like you watched them for what they deem too long? Pretty much, that's how it went down. fuck feminazism, i really hope more people wake up on this bullshit, as soon as most men wake up, no way women would be able to get away with this I would hope so at some point. I don't hold my breath.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:31 AM
2

Well its no secret in the United States we pay for everything. Here employers are partially responsible for paying into the unemployment. There usually is a payroll insurance that they pay into. Anytime they have to pay out they run the risk of having their rates increased. Usually smaller companies don't carry this. The only time the government picks up the entire bill is if the company is dissolved and they did not have insurance. The duration of how long we can be on it is up to the state. In…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:28 AM
4

Yeah pretty much. The craziest part was the accusing me of having a hardon under my pants and not hiding it. They literally said under oath that because I was leaning back in a chair, they could see the front contours of my crotch area showing that I appeared to have a hard on. Essentially they were admitting to basically doing the same thing to me that they alleged I did to them. How crazy is that. Only in this day and age, can a couple of dank whores can actually admit to sexual harassment as …
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:12 AM
3

Cynical? Possibly, but otherwise explain this: at my last job, I worked for a large multinational (through an employment agency). No your right on the money. We can thank all these fucking SJW's and politician and Marxists judges for letting this shit go this way. Not just companies, but government as well. At least government has arbitration processes, although the US military is a beacon of railroading now to meet the cackles of whores such as Gillibrand and McCaskill. to complete 42 different…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 08:59 AM
4

Yup you definitely don't say anything. I knew this going in as well. I have held management positions in the past and had to fire people for inappropriate behavior. At the time when this happened I was sort of in a huge state of shock and I did mentally prepare myself. In some sense I may have thought that the HR manager would have handled it the way I would have. You know what they say about assuming? Luckily their claims sounded so ridiculous that the judge read into it. Also the law and the h…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 08:30 AM
1

Wow what fucking fat slob whore that she is. What a piece of trash. The real father should have to pay that shit. He was was the one who planted the seed.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 06:44 AM
2

I know someone in another state near Colorado who's ex did that same thing with a child she had three years after the breakup. She decided just for the hell of it to put his name as the father on the birth certificate. Apparently its a easy thing to do. The father does not have to be present. This is a law that needs to be changed. Who ever issued those certificates should be responsible if they allow a fraudulent claim without no proof.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 06:36 AM
15

That's the million dollar question. I am not sure I will ever know, TBH. The queen bee, i.e. the instigator bitch died a year later and chose to take it with her to the grave. Her motivation on starting all of this is with her rotting corpse somewhere in Virginia. A part of me thinks that the queen bitch was suffering from some disillusion sorta like a schizophrenic who sees and hears things, but not at the clinical level. Or she did not like me. Sometimes there are no rational reasons why peopl…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 05:16 AM
1

Fuck her and she can go to hell! Maybe at the time when he was flirting and it was unwanted then she may have had a case if she reported it. It sounds like she took advantage of the situation for her own gain, now she is just trying to be vindictive is what it sounds like. Of course this is the real world and we are in a society now where women can use their pussys as weapons to destroy peoples lives. From what it sounds like she was in the relationship prior to be hired and he helped the bitch …
/r/MensRights27/11/17 09:10 PM
1

Exactly!
/r/MensRights27/11/17 08:57 PM
2

All very sound advice. Number 1 being the safest, but not one 90% male population will follow, myself included when I was that age. If you don't follow number 1, at least follow 2 through 12.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 05:03 AM
0

I am glad this went down this way. I live in liberal Washington where they probably would have charged the father They would have called the rapist a victim. Given that rapist family free fucking psych counseling for wrongfully losing their loved one let alone he was raping a 5 year old kid. We have a give a thug a hug attitude. We think that a child molester rapist is reformable. They go to jail here and get protective custody and get out after 5 years from some libtard councilor who thinks the…
/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:16 AM
3

My guess is this is a half ass attempt to appease some of the left wing feninazi's.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:32 PM
1

Wow that's an eye opener. I knew it was bad. I had no idea it had that much unlawful command influence. Are there any pro military senators right now to counter those two cackling hags? Or is this just one those pick your battles issues? That sucks when some E-3 type gets lit up. He probably does not have the means to afford your or your cohorts services. He is stuck with the Capt that just graduated law school ADC guy who will fumble and bumble a case. His life is over. This is good info. I wil…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:05 PM
2

Probably right. Eventually enough people will burned by the NOW and will stop putting up with their shit.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:58 AM
1

That sucks. In the civilian work place a bitch just needs to say you looked at her in an uncomfortable manner to get you fired. They should have stiff penalties for false accusations.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:20 AM
2

Oh yeah the green dot training. Went through that in November in my reserve unit.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:23 AM
5

That'll stop em. SMFH! I am sure that org supports some politicians who probably force it down the wing's throat. I bet the wing pays for it out of normal operating funds. Some wing king would be damned to hell and back for not pushing this. Fuck this shit. Because of this I always tell Airman to fucking keep in their pants unless they want to play a game that can ruin their life. One false accusation and that's it, you are done.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:04 AM
2

Pretty much
/r/MensRights15/03/17 01:58 AM
22

Yup. The only time I ever read it go the other way is if its the teacher on kid thing. The 24 year old teacher fucks the 15 year old high school jock. 99% of the drunk sex accusations end up going in favor of the chick. I was in a fraternity in school. It was mandatory every year to get a sexual assault briefing from campus police. The cop who did this always said the law is going to go toward female with the bias. In my state its first to the finish line is the winner. Basically they decide who…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 12:22 AM
1

it sounds like you have a pretty clear cut lawsuit against them for wrongful termination and possibly more depending on how they handled things. Yeah I would have thought so. If it was in the state I reside in I would have had a stronger case. My state has more labor protections then the one the company was headquartered in. This job did not require me to live in the state of the company headquarters. Because 98% of the flying is done at the remote location in two to three month deployments. The…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:48 PM
42

Hopefully it goes in his favor. I would like to see some of these reverse discrimination laws go away. The are a runaway freight train at the moment.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 09:16 PM
51

You gotta love these laws, thanks to feminazi's. Now its law where you have sex with someone who is drunk you raped her because she could not consent. Well, Johnny and Jane are at the frat party and were both drunk. They both have sex. But the victim is always the female. Obviously to these feminists there is no such thing as a horny drunk girl crawling over drunk guys putting their hands down a dudes pants and doing things that if a guy did this it would be sexual assault. Its ok if a girl does…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 09:15 PM
1

In this case I would have needed those glasses that have a small camera in them. I agree you have to be very careful now in the work place. You never know who might have a beef with you and go chirping at the mouth. My trust in people is much lower now than it used to be. I will have to admit, I heard of these horror stories, but figured it happened who to people who do get too close to the line. I have even had coworkers in other jobs where I thought they need to be careful. I researched this t…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 08:50 PM
1

Well, that would make sense except this type of job. So I'll describe this job. It was to fly a special mission aircraft for a gov contractor. No James Bond shit or anything like that. It did involve flying in very risky places in the world, which is what commanded the high salary. Normally you have to be a Captain or a very hour high First Officer to make that kind of money in aviation. Actually this company was paying on the low side of doing this type of flying. They are all rooted in nepotis…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 07:11 PM
1

I completely agree. When you are in situation like mine, the only worst thing that can happen would be criminal accusation. Going through this whole thing is life changing. At the time this happened, I could not get much sleep at night, could barley eat had bad acid re-flux pains for months. I never had an anxiety attack ever in my life until this happened. I thought I was having a heart attack. One day I was walking with my friend and started to get numb in the face in hands. I had no fucking i…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:45 PM
1

Thanks, Yeah its a real eye opener. I was thinking on how quick someone can go to jail over a quick allegation. Especially now where you have a society who is promoting a narrative that you must be guilty if you been accused.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:09 PM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:03 PM
1

Agreed
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:52 PM
2

They should have thrown her fucking ass in jail. In the US the girl would have had her father in prison.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 04:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter