TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

funnybillypro Archive

View 10 posts and 579 comments by funnybillypro on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I think it's more important than ever for men to talk to each other — not complain to each other. That talking should involve challenging each other, keeping empathy towards women's experience in the mix, and reminding each other that what we were taught 'The Standards' are have been and still are total bonk. I'm under 6-foot. I've always been chubby/thicc. I don't think I've ever made even $70k in a year. The dick is...good but not huge (not that they all want it huge). My hair has a thin spot …
/r/ExRedPill20/07/26 04:15 PM
24

They don't want to consider that their *personalities* are unfuckable. That's why the obsession with height, eye color, dick size, etc. These are things they can't control. But not going to therapy? Not engaging with emotions? Not being good in bed? They *could* change that, but don't want to. and a byproduct of that plus a lot of women preferring no sex to bad sex is...adult men are having less sex. Allegedly. (I haven't looked at the numbers.)
/r/ExRedPill17/07/26 06:18 PM
1

Try dating men first frfr I post a video with my shirt off on Instagram and it's not complimentary, but gross.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 05:35 PM
14

Sounds like something to blame the biased teachers for. No? The shes involved are probably just trying to do their work.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 01:09 PM
0

This can be true for this woman and also not all or most women. And even if most, does not mean vast majority of. For all we know, fat dude is a shit boyfriend.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/26 12:02 PM
2

I'll give two cuz I'm heading home to bed but: not making eye contact while you talk to her (politeness but not interested) even if she curtly responds coming up with excuses that don't make sense (she doesn't need you to problem solve, she just wants to exit without you being confrontational)
/r/ExRedPill16/03/26 06:52 AM
1

Not big flaccid size. I said what I said cuz I know you're focused on the wrong things. I want more for you — I mean it. DM me if you wanna find some time to talk it out. You can have what you define as success too.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 06:49 AM
1

See how I did a list and you didn't name a single right that you had and the lost? I'm doing well. I have a lot of sex. I haven't faced one piece of discrimination by the state except for a 2009 incident that changed MetLife stadium's security procedure. And I'm not worried about women gaining equality. It's not zero-sum. This is why you have a hard time dating.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 08:05 PM
0

I really think getting women closer to equality benefits men in a lot of ways. Personally, as a man, the right wing's publicly stated agenda (Project 2025, Heritage Foundation, Trump and/or his cute cabinet secretaries): - want to end no-fault divorce, making it more difficult to escape bad marriages - want to end abortion and make birth control access difficult, making it scarier to have fun sexual experiences for fear of unwanted pregnancies - want to overturn Lawrence v. Texas, which puts our…
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:42 PM
7

yeah or at least go with a group of friends so you have a primary anchor at the bar — a reason to be there and have fun that has nothing to do with picking someone up. and in the natural course of events, or some help from a friend, you can talk to other women at the place. it's not creepy to approach women at a bar — especially when it's a young fun bar. It's a place to be approached. You just need to be mindful of cues and such to not miss when she's saying no without explicitly saying no. Lea…
/r/ExRedPill08/03/26 06:35 PM
1

Just because you're hurt doesn't mean it's okay when you're shitty to other people.
/r/ExRedPill25/02/26 12:53 AM
2

I mean i don't disagree with -the freedom to seek pleasurable sexual experiences outside of one single committed romantic relationship -roe v. wad I'm a fan of choice. If you want to do a traditional family model, do it! If you want to be slutty and single, do it! If you want a less-traditional family model, do it! What I don't like is when someone says that their way is *the* way and that any other way that causes no hatred or harm should be ostracized. but with that opening lede, i wasn't read…
/r/MensRights24/02/26 03:10 PM
1

I'm really not doing what you're thinking. Where they're coming from is what I want to showcase....and also...where they are coming from — hating on slutty women while they try to bang as many themselves — is dumb and silly. I've talk about this stuff for work for 12 years. It's kinda my thing. Have the best day.
/r/ExRedPill23/02/26 07:03 PM
73

I don't know. Hard to seriously read when the first sentence of the lede is "There is nothing more terrifying than [a night without sex]"
/r/MensRights23/02/26 06:38 PM
5

Yes, from odd fans. I talk about sex for a living, so there's some presumption that I am their sexual outlet. I hear that a lot from women creators in the sex space. Shocked? But if I mention "hey I didn't ask for that," they usually apologize and acknowledge their blunder. Women aren't used to be called on that because of what they were taught to assume about men.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 04:03 AM
-3

I wouldn't call this rape but I am also sorry that that happened to you. She should have taken your no seriously.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 11:44 PM
1

gosh that's a terrible place to get views on feminism. that'd be like getting your views on men's rights from =checks notes= yup.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 08:42 PM
0

because not all women are like that. i've been low-income nearly a decade and i've been dating and fucking just fine.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 04:31 AM
15

Good for you, man. Welcome to the world. I talk about sex and dating from a sex+ lens, and I want to see more dudes like you break away from this *without* falling down religious/gendered/sex-negative paths. It's a lot more fun here. <3
/r/ExRedPill18/11/25 06:34 PM
1

Just curious: If I made a video with the same number of cute chicks *not* saying these things...would you believe *that*? If they were more constructive about what it tangibly means when they 'don't be creepy', would that be helpful? Like I want dudes to feel more confidant making approaches after making some tweaks and changes. **However** I'll also say that if dudes' type is someone traditional-minded and gender-coded, they'll likely run into this attitude a lot. But yeah, do guys actually wan…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 05:46 PM
1

So again, I was right: they are not teaching CRT curriculum to first graders. That's it. Bye, lady.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 09:04 PM
1

That's not CRT. That is something race-conscious. If a teacher said, "You, George, oppressed..." that's crazy. But DID they say that??? Or did they say "white people oppressed..."? I don't know, ma'am, I wasn't in the classroom and first graders are not known for their direct quote note taking skills. I'm sure the truth is somewhere in between. But CRT is a specific curriculum and it is impossible to teach it to a first grader. Call it something else; it's not proper noun Critical Race Theory. F…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 08:25 PM
0

lol
/r/MensRights11/11/25 09:23 PM
2

Thanks. So they're not like filming the guy. They're just shittalking about some anonymous man like an asshole? Also fwiw I'm in my mid-30s and HVW was a dude invention. That's what those PUAs called them. The women seem to be co-opting the term, taking it back. But it ain't cuz they came up with it. It's a dumb term (just like High Value Man).
/r/MensRights11/11/25 06:50 AM
-24

okay but i hate this cartoon because literally no one is teaching critical race theory to children in schools. it's graduate school-level subject matter. it's annoying when people say "crt" or "woke" or "DEI" when something isn't instead of just saying what they're actually upset is being taught. like if someone is mad that they're teaching "white people owned slaves until not *that* long ago in this country," like, just say that's what you're mad about.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 07:00 PM
2

Gotcha. That's fair. (I upvoted.) Unless you want to share your personal experience with call-out culture, I'd venture I've had more public occurrences of this in terms of severity and quantity than *most* commenters in this thread. And I've suffered from it. And I've learned some things from it. Just because some people were wrong doesn't mean I had no place to grow. That's most of the sentiment of what I'm going after. When we're not talking about SA, I think we can take a deep breath. In 2025…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 06:34 PM
2

The article is about men being filmed on dates in public, no?
/r/MensRights10/11/25 06:00 PM
1

You're being vague like women are being vague. What kind of ruining lives are we talking about?? The article isn't talking about assault accusations. We're talking about being filmed...in public...(i'm still unclear about what kind of videos these are.) Never did I say "it's okay to try to ruin lives." However, if someone raped me (she did), I wouldn't mind her life being ruined since she (like some men i've heard) adamantly denying she did that. The question to *you*, Centaur_Warchief123, is: W…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 05:52 PM
2

Do you have any links to the kind of videos we're all talking about here? Maybe I just don't get this part of TikTok but I can't imagine being on a date with a woman and her starting to film me. (And I've been on a lot of dates with a lot of women for a long time...) I'm not challenging. I just want to see what y'all are seeing.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 05:25 PM
2

I don't want to shame guys in the article. They seem scared! That makes me feel for them. Being scared sucks! I want to meet this younger generation of men where they're at as a millennial who's been through plenty of this and help them be less scared.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 05:24 PM
1

That's so strange. I think "all" doesn't work here cuz this just isn't my experience, and I kind of fuck and date for a living. Maybe "many" is a more appropriate word since I can disprove "all" and we don't have stats to say "most." It's not to be annoying about it. Tying yourself to this notion of all women (just like when women tie themselves to the notion of all men), it's so easy to live in a defeatist place that keeps you away from one day getting what you want. And i want dudes to get the…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 05:21 PM
5

(I'm personally curious why we're talking about your ex-wife cheating on you during the just-matched phase of app dating. But I'm not shaming you for it and it's not necessarily important here.) Be grateful someone showed you you don't want to date her early. Keep at it though!
/r/MensRights10/11/25 05:19 PM
2

Well it's also cuz those old guys still need their kids to help them unlock their phones :P
/r/MensRights10/11/25 05:17 PM
2

Do you (or anyone) have any links to videos of women blasting a guy for going to chat her up? Maybe I'm just not in that part of tiktok, but that seems wild for someone to film a guy who respectfully approached, was told no thank you, who then took the no thank you with grace and walked away. I'm not calling anyone a liar. I just want to see what y'all are seeing.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 05:17 PM
-1

What did I twist? You said false accusations. false accusations of...what? There's not such thing as "false accusations of creepyness." That's subjective and few care about someone saying creepy over and over with not specifics. We're getting into a healthier time now where people want to know, "Okay...what did they *do*?" Those who just keep saying creepy and vague buzzwords tend to not be taken seriously — not to the point of punishing someone. Now if it's, "Yeah he's bad with personal space a…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 05:09 PM
-15

OP wasn't talking about false rape accusations. Interesting your mind jumps to that. AND I can still reset more than you can on a more public level than you can. I'm here with my government name. Don't tell me you know what any of that can be like till you can say your name coward-boo-boo.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 04:03 AM
-21

I've lost gigs. How I speak about what anyone says, how I'm transparent, and how I take accountability where applicable is why I'm okay. OP didn't say accusation of rape. Just some kind of public posting nonsense. That you jumped to false rape allegations is...interesting. So yeah, if people post some vague subjective stuff, you'll survive. Unless you react like you reacted here. Then that'll seem sus. People be saying mean things on the internet. Welcome to the internet boo boo. Stay behind you…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 04:01 AM
-48

IDK. I've had some pretty horrid things said about me on the internet and I'm...fine. A good friend said to me once, "I am far more interested in how a man responds to a call out or inquiry about an incident than what the actual alleged offense was." Outside of something super violent like, "He sent me to the hospital. Here's screenshots of him raging and a selfie with the black eye," type of stuff. I recently had to have a conversation with a guy about a whisper-whisper kind of story that, when…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 01:17 AM
4

I had to go in to read what the fear of filming was. Are chicks really on dates — not just on their phones but — filming the date??? I mean beyond a picture of the food or quick video of the restaurant. I've been on a lot of dates with a lot of women in NYC and I've never encountered a newer date trying to film *me* on the date. If anything, I've had to mention someone being on her phone too much, but ??? The only thing I can think of is something justifiable when someone is actually without que…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 01:12 AM
3

oh i know. i saw your other comment mentioning that. 'you' is some third party 'who' :)
/r/ExRedPill23/10/25 02:28 PM
5

Depends on the woman. I kind of have sex and date for a living...I do not make a lot of money. I can't pick up certain checks. I can support myself, but the women I date happen to be okay with cheap date nights or splitting checks And you know why they were cool with it? They saw passion in what I was doing as a full-time sex podcaster and comedian. They saw that I was being successful at the thing even if that wasn't, at the moment, financial success. But I'm also not into women who are into tr…
/r/ExRedPill23/10/25 01:34 PM
2

Deconstructing expectations of them "as men" as opposed to as humans.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 05:31 AM
-4

I didn't accuse you, sir, of anything. I am speaking to a larger trend that is out there. It's so pervasive that women very often are on the lookout for it. And being aware of that and distinguishing yourself from that is helpful. Not everything is about you. But you live in the context of that everything, and some of the most helpful advice I received was being told that I do not live in a vacuum. There is love for you out there. I promise. I also once was worried it wasn't out there for me. I …
/r/MensRights11/09/25 08:55 PM
0

I'll add on considering some of the stuff you're mentioning from class: That's kind of a real reality for *most* women. If they haven't been R'd or SA'd, their friend or sister has. And even then, there's a slew of other "weird shit" — we'll just call it — that they have experienced. Understanding and appreciating that is going to really help you as you make all sorts of mistakes and stumbles and learn lessons in these years of young adulthood.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 05:55 PM
-7

It is totally probable...if that Gen Z man has the right mindset about relationships. Honestly, "trying to get a girlfriend" is probably not a good "strategy." As Jon Stewart often anecdotes about what a political advisor for a politician said before taping many many years ago: So you're saying the strategy...is authenticity? Don't worry about the strategy. Worry first about getting your head on straight. Good things follow that, and planned intentions can come afterwards. If you focus on strate…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 05:52 PM
0

The internet is not the real world. And I'm pointing out why my experience may be different from yours — with a suggestion that you can do too. It's not like I'm having a different outcome for no reason. If the shoe fits, wear it. If not, downvote and throw it away. This argumentation is probably some % reason why you're having the personal experience that you're having. Have the best day.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 07:49 PM
0

I agree. And I shared how I skip that: I make it easy to know that I already know that. And that I'd like to talk about this over here.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:53 PM
-3

In the grand contest outside of what's directly in front of you in your experience: yes. Yes, it is. If the type of person who kept doing the same terrible thing to you was disproportionately one type of person, you would also act differently and not give vast benefits of the doubt. Do you wanna gripe about who is right or wrong or do you wanna meet someone where they're at and get somewhere? I wanna go somewhere.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:46 PM
-1

I'm sharing something that has aided me in having productive conversations about the topics you're passionate about. I'm interested in progress, not gripes.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:35 PM
-4

I hear you. I talk about these issues for work — often with women — on a public platform and in private. I find that I get a good deal of grace to talk about issues facing men...because they know where I stand on women's issues. Sometimes I have to drop a line about grape or shitty behavior I've received from women for them to hear that I might at least kind of understand, but I've had pretty great conversations with feminist women about men's issues. So many women face so many dudes so often wh…
/r/MensRights28/08/25 04:41 PM
1

Do you think many (dare we claim 'most') MRA dudes are concerned about the incels? I don't know that I've seen that come up here, and I can see how some might try to conflate the two ideologies or populations.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 11:44 PM
3

Is there a talking head or public personality who specializes in talking about these cases? Jc
/r/MensRights21/08/25 07:55 PM
1

lol feminists are not going to be mad about this. the response will be: good! break from traditional norms and do marriage *if you want to*. Marriage is not a requirement for having a family or buying a home or getting a promotion at work or having sex like it used to be. This is all very good — for any gender. and when you choose to get the State involved, you'll hopefully be more serious about it. (or we'll redefine what these marital contracts mean and what they do.)
/r/MensRights17/08/25 05:38 PM
11

I can't recommend enough: Don't "try to get a girlfriend." Go exist in the world and connect with human beings. Every time you speak to a woman you're attracted to doesn't need to be the goal of "how do I get this to be a date?" Just ride the waves of connection and authenticity. That'll get you places more than fixating on a "goal." Join the group to meet people, not to "get a girlfriend." You'll be more relaxed, and more relaxed people are more attractive.
/r/ExRedPill18/07/25 05:01 PM
2

Woahhhh debating that there isn't a genocide happening? Big 🚩🚩. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DL2dO-nKtdD/?igsh=a2Zzem1tNDBwYmdv
/r/ExRedPill15/07/25 02:05 AM
1

Porn is acting. In the fast and furious movies someone is actually driving those cars, a stunt person. Porn sex is stunt Sex. Ma'am, I interview the experts for a living. You have a nice day.
/r/ExRedPill14/07/25 08:47 PM
1

Many female creators would counter that the answer to any dangerous behavioral influences isn't 'no porn' (which won't happen because it's exhausted for thousands of years) but rather a combination of: more and varied porn (which there's been a huge surge in among female directors and queer performers) comprehensive sex ed We don't ban the fast and furious movies for showing unrealistic and dangerous driving styles. We have driver's ed to contextualize what kids see on-screen to know that that's…
/r/ExRedPill14/07/25 06:12 PM
3

This isn't who I'm talking about exactly but I seriously think Marc Maron.
/r/ExRedPill14/07/25 01:32 PM
5

Replicated with other behaviors too. There's the added context of lack of sex ed and anti-sex stigmatization. Dr. Nicole Prouse released great research over the last few years. I talk about this for a living my dude. We're not going to have an even debate over your anonymous account. But if you wanna get on mic with your government name, hey, I'll hold space for that conversation.
/r/ExRedPill14/07/25 01:16 AM
2

I don't hate this so long as the porn break isn't anti-porn language but pro-Internet break language. No need to give him a complex about something that isn't a problem — and causes, based on research, the most problems in people who think it's a problem.
/r/ExRedPill14/07/25 12:38 AM
24

Introduce him to male personalities online that have healthier, sex-positive viewpoints — that also get laid. I wish that last part didn't matter, but it seems to matter to these guys. It unfortunately lends credibility to listen to a dude talking about women's pleasure and denying traditional gender roles — otherwise they might write that YouTuber or writer off as 'what tf does he know about chicks??' Whatever turns one foot of his away from red pill is how he starts to walk away from it. Espec…
/r/ExRedPill13/07/25 05:25 PM
-1

Mannnn the answer to the question was either nothing or names. Y'all are thinking way too hard.
/r/ExRedPill25/06/25 04:00 AM
-1

I don't think I should have to go super in depth beyond "their bullshit" and "sex educators I already agree with." That's enough to communicate: I'm not one of those dudes. Again, people could have just....said nothing.
/r/ExRedPill24/06/25 09:31 PM
3

Thanks!
/r/ExRedPill24/06/25 02:24 PM
1

Crazy that you're the only one who answered. And that the rest in this thread are mad that I asked.
/r/ExRedPill24/06/25 01:13 PM
-1

None of that has to do with how I made a post inquiring who the names to look into were, and people could have said: names or nothing. What a world where asking a question is met with this reaction. Could have downvoted and moved on. Some in this thread are battling me like I'm one of them. Gosh I didn't ask "what's so wrong about these red pill bros?? Come onnnnnnn!"
/r/ExRedPill24/06/25 01:12 PM
-2

Vitriolic. Hmm.
/r/ExRedPill24/06/25 01:10 PM
2

Got any names?
/r/ExRedPill24/06/25 03:21 AM
-1

Helping guys find clarity and peace of mind around masculinity, sexuality, and dating is literally what I do. For over a decade. And now I'd like to try chatting with one of these influencer types face-to-face. Gonna stop responding now. If anyone cares to share who some of the names are in that space, much appreciated. It'll be interesting to see them try to tell me that their snake oil is The Way when my sex life proves quite the opposite. Good luck to you, ooa. With whatever noble work you're…
/r/ExRedPill24/06/25 03:20 AM
-2

I'll let you know when I'm looking for a list of people to lineup, blindfold, and cover with hot wax. I imagine you'll be more excited to answer then. You also could've just said… Nothing.
/r/ExRedPill23/06/25 11:42 PM
-1

I asked a simple question. Who is putting problematic content out there for men? Don't wanna answer, don't answer. I'll go back to my job talking to men to show them there's another way regardless. ✌️
/r/ExRedPill23/06/25 11:40 PM
-7

I'd encourage you to show some curiosity and ask a question like, "What would you want to do with them?" You don't know me. You don't know my background with those kinda guys and my career talking about sex and women and masculinity. You doubt you know my show. If I was going to crucify them until they confessed to all their followers that it's all a sham, would you be more supportive of the pursuit? You don't have enough information to make a judgment about this "private endeavor" (just my actu…
/r/ExRedPill23/06/25 05:21 PM
-11

Oh, I'm confused. Then it sounds like you were telling me who and how and why to have people on my show.
/r/ExRedPill23/06/25 03:22 PM
-12

Then you shouldn't have them on your show.
/r/ExRedPill23/06/25 03:15 PM
2

And who taught them to do and expect that?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 06:09 AM
3

Take it as a challenge to *be better* You're 19? There is so much time. Your sexual/romantic history like...just started. You're taking those awkward toddler steps when they first learn to walk. It doesn't all have to click right now. The best thing you can do is be self-aware, self-improve, and be fun. And eat pussy.
/r/ExRedPill08/04/25 12:11 AM
-66

The post should be just this comment. Not the anti-porn of it all. During lockdown, I (30s, man) was making my rent on OF. It's not a necessary evil. It can be a lot of things to someone, and it's not really anyone's business. But yeah, not fair to draft one and not the other.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 07:05 PM
-35

eh. it's more like: incels *are* sexist and hateful towards women. they blame women for 'denying' them the sex. not all sexists are incels, but all incels [who post and participate in these groups] are sexist.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 02:14 AM
-107

Feminism didn't create incel culture, and it's certainly not what perpetuates it. *Every* woman I know who knows about incel culture **desperately** wants those men to **not** think that their value is wrapped up in how much sex they have. Yeah, people call people incels....because those incels are in incel subreddits or call themselves incels.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 02:13 AM
–

well as you see: OP says "men of all ages"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 03:01 PM
–

Im 35. My girlfriend is 42. What're you talking about? You're gonna need to produce a sexual resume to show that your thought on this matters. See my entire career for mine. Everyone got preferences. It's when you try to pretend that your preference is the right one when someone sounds sooooo unfuckable. You sound under 25 or backed up, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 07:53 AM
-10

If you continue into the locker room, yes it is. Do you know that there is a camera in there and you chose to still go in.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 10:07 PM
2

Nancy Mace called the cops on a trans guy for shaking her hand. They're uncomfortable around trans people.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 01:08 AM
-8

And why'd she say that? Cuz the man is trans (FTM).
/r/MensRights15/12/24 07:04 PM
-15

worth mentioning the factor that many spaces were already men's only spaces — either because they said that or they don't 'say' it but act like it. we don't live in a vacuum. context matters when discussing these things, not that it's not worth discussing the question "can/should/how could there be explicitly men's only spaces?" you might already acknowledge that to yourself, but i don't assume that in this particular subreddit. might be worth mentioning in half a sentence so people can acknowle…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 07:05 PM
1

This might have a lot more to do about being on the spectrum and engaging with emotional-over-logical behavior than about 'women.' I've also got a touch of the 'tism, and it helped me — not just with women, but in handling emotionally charged life situations — to relearn 'rules' to make emotions logical. Like if someone feels a certain way, of course they would possibly react in X manner. You know? Someone I knew from the midwest (I'm a new yorker) explained how people he grew up with feel like …
/r/MensRights11/12/24 06:48 PM
-6

Mannnn this is way too reasonable for this subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 07:45 PM
0

I know. But the sold out audiences aren't. 💅
/r/MensRights04/12/24 11:15 PM
0

Go check yourself.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 10:39 PM
-4

(I mean the Justice system is run by...) The Patriarchy is a system, and it's not specifically about 'men' doing blank. It's similar to WS — a system. That system places white people at the top. Patriarchy places Men at the top — again, not every single man. (But like racism, 🎶we're all a little bit sexist sometimes 🎶) The system that put sexual expectations on men to want all the sex and women to not be seen as violent and that put the older double standards in place is what allows that teacher…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 09:18 PM
-4

She's not being the most compassionate but she's not wrong. The system of Patriarchy — which isn't 'men' just like 'white supremacy' is not 'all white people' — is why that teacher wasn't punished. It's on us dudes in here to talk to other dudes who say 'lucky guy.' Cuz I've heard more men dismiss these rapes than women (at least that's just my personal experience).
/r/MensRights04/12/24 09:04 PM
-16

Do you have sex often with women?
/r/MensRights03/12/24 08:56 PM
-4

In another thread — and a pattern I notice in attitude on this sub — I see so many dudes speak to how all women will act and how they can't think beyond their own self-interest. And it made me sad to think how hopeless that view of the world is, where everyone who isn't you is out to get you for their own gain. That exists. But to think that's what you're surrounded by constantly that you don't think female SCOTUS justices could rule in favor of a men's issue made me feel sorry for this guy.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:41 PM
0

Interesting. That's not really my experience. The woman who just laughs and dismisses it is rare. Maybe it's because, around men, there's a context of they know I don't think women are to blame for all of men's woes and I acknowledge where women and other oppressed groups are still at a disadvantage. When they know that it's not a versus, and I mention men's rights, most of the women respond affirmatively. Just my experience y'all. Downvote away I guess.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:23 PM
1

It's weird. I hear "libertarian" but I see that they just care about crypto and saying the N word. When the other civil rights come along, it's fucking silent from the libertarian bros. If you just focus on libertarian values for Me & Those Like Me, you lose. It's gotta be a We. I'm reading about the founding fathers right now and this concept came up. Many believed a Republic could *only* succeed if people could put aside their personal gripes for the Common Good. I thought, "Oh. So that's why …
/r/MensRights03/12/24 02:37 PM
1

Ugh. That sounds so frustrating!
/r/MensRights03/12/24 02:33 PM
-1

You really seem convinced that no one could do the Right Thing for the Greater Good. That must be a very dark way to look at the world. Good luck, sir. <3
/r/MensRights03/12/24 02:31 AM
-1

My observation is that they seem most interested in the Constitution. So yeah. I'm confidant in them.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 02:26 AM
-2

I don't. I point it out so some dudes on here (#NotAllDudesOnHere, jfc) stop getting pissed at women for something that was decided on by a group comprised of all or mostly men. the call — on almost everything this sub is upset about — is coming from inside the house.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:39 PM
-7

i plan to. maybe even interview her. doesn't change who's holding the pen to sign these decisions bruh.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:58 PM
-8

in here, i see a lot of being upset at women because two chicks they dated didn't work out. for real. i just want dudes in here to recognize that rich men are responsible for almost any policy they're mad about. it's not all men...but of the culprits, it's mostly men. like it's dumb to be mad at women for the SSA.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:50 PM
-6

just checking.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:47 PM
-14

and you wouldn't be on here upset about disproportionate discipline if she started doing that instead (if boys are disproportionately disruptive)?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:33 PM
-7

Men? It looks like....men are responsible for this? Just checking. Get this thing overturned! Maybe with four women on the court, it'll go differently...
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:26 PM
-22

You know, what do you think about the boys' behavior she described in her post?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:00 PM
1

Idk what to tell you. Celibate is a label. And when you don't experience sexual desire, that's asexual. What you proposed isn't radical for someone who is asexual. It's just 'following your [lack of] desire.' Good luck with your path. Hope you find what you're looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 03:56 PM
1

So this isn't a poll of 'Men' but 'Men who follow a hot fitness chick on YouTube.' Hmm......
/r/MensRights01/12/24 03:12 PM
1

See i have a hard time with videos like these. Is my experience really that strange? I don't feel the way she describes how men feels, and I don't have as much of the 'problems' described here. Also kind of lost me at 'dress/act like a lady' because the inverse is that I have to 'dress/act like a man.' Ew.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 03:06 PM
2

Yo. We all need therapy. If you have no sexual desire, you're not just celibate. You're asexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 03:01 PM
0

Sir, if you're having an extreme reaction to being sexually thirsty, you'd benefit from therapy. And i promise you that the women you will one day date after your celibacy era will wish you had gone to therapy. I know because every fucking woman i talk to wishes the men they're dating would go to therapy. They usually tell me that on mic or right after I make them cum. Anyways, we're not far apart here. You say "no to sex' and I say "don't focus on sex" that doesn't cut off exceptional possibili…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 02:48 PM
1

Nah. Cuz then celibacy 'ends' and you 'escape' these rigid 'rules' — and there are many studies about different abstinence-style methods. Like dieting. They don't usually work long-term. You don't have to say "no sex" to have a healthier attitude about sex. Extremes aren't usually healthy. If you're working on yourself and focused on that and meet *an amazing person* by accident in the real world where there's mutual chemistry...don't ignore that connection because of arbitrary extreme rules. Tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 02:40 PM
0

This is actually the best way to get laid. Don't call it celibacy with these firm and rigid "rules" you didn't really create. Call it a "refocus" where you are open to connections you may meet. Because all of the above that you listed are really attractive qualities. It's how you beat what you view as a "rigged game" — except the rigged game isn't 'modern dating.' It's Thirst.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 02:31 PM
-1

That's not true. They just don't use the phrase "gender equality" cuz that wasn't a term. It wasn't not an idea. Early slaves couldn't write that they wanted freedom. So how could we possibly know that slaves wanted to be free unless that specific one told me so??? /s
/r/MensRights26/11/24 05:45 AM
0

If your package comes to my house by mistake, are you punishing me by coming to retrieve it? So we should be able to benefit from our father's crimes but can't be "punished" for them? Those are my two questions. Thank you.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 04:49 AM
-4

Not obviously. You said women didn't desire rights until the 1700s when thousands of years of writing suggests otherwise. Movements were difficult to put together. That doesn't mean desire or small movements weren't there. There are histories of female-led societies in the world long before 1700! Next you're going to tell me that Black people didn't want Civil Rights until the 1950s???? Rarely do I say: What you said is fucking retarded.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 03:53 AM
-4

Which were you referencing? Commonly, when people say that they're referring to the late 19th/early 20th. Even though there was totally an IR long before that one. Your assessment on historical roles are....really really off. What're you talking about? "Literally zero history of...women's movements before the last few centuries." My man...
/r/MensRights26/11/24 03:35 AM
0

OP, what do you think you're most taking away from this thread of answers and sub-replies?
/r/MensRights26/11/24 03:03 AM
-17

No desire for it? Tell that to the women writing about wanting their own bank account, to be able to own property without a man, to vote, etc pre-IR. Women have been trying to be allowed to do shit for thousands of years, man. There's always a desire for equality! You just used to have to be careful when you expressed the desire so you didn't catch a hand or a bullet. When massa asks a slave if he likes working for Big Jim, just because they said 'yes' didn't mean they didn't have a desire for f…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 03:02 AM
-7

It's not whataboutism. It's contextualizing. I didn't say "but what about this over here?!" to dismiss the original concern (OP doesn't have one). I mentioned context to help me understand a men-related complaint in the context of the world we live in (and largely created). Understanding that can help effectively communicate problems and proposed solutions to have allies outside of boys on reddit who are focused on being upset at women. Which is not OP's take. OP is where we should be: focused o…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 02:46 AM
-12

Okay. Tried another way: What would you call taking land that was stolen away from someone whose family stole it and giving it to someone whose family it was? I'm not saying deny men a seat at a lunch counter. There are just proactive steps you have to take to catch multiple groups of people up to the white man....cuz of shit white men did. You can't just say 'well, we're all just gonna treat each other equally now while i conveniently have a lot more chips than you as a byproduct of the previou…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 12:04 AM
-45

I have other comments in this thread, mentioning how you can correct past wrongs without present solutions. Which feels like discrimination against the majority, but I said the majority is just finally being treated fairly. Some jumpstart is needed. Why is Medicaid not considered discrimination against people who make money or Medicare not discrimination based on age? Show me an example where someone's grade is changed very explicitly because it's a girl and I'll stfu for a minute.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:58 PM
-24

Correct to not hate. To correct past wrongs requires present solutions. We can't pretend it's fair to say "okay, NOW we'll be fair [while many still aren't]" like we're starting on the same line.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:34 PM
-53

I relate to a lot you said, but it took me awhile to accept that we don't live in a vacuum. If everyone starts a poker game with 200 chip, it's not fair if someone got to play for a few hundred years first to have 2,000 chips. To correct historical and structural inequality, some temporary "inequality" for the majority is necessary to get to fairness. Every generation doesn't wanna be the generation to "lose" a little by being treated actually fairly — which looks like advantaging others at a co…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:00 PM
-21

See, "just as women need ours" is what I can respect and read in this sub. There's so little of that in here. Lots of spiteful versus mentality. Im more open to watching the doc because of your comment than the idk how many who shitposted before you.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:53 PM
-70

I mean, it was reversed for millennia. On this issue, which is real, I'm curious what specific measures people want implemented. Like are they upset at underperformance or do they have solutions? What tangible fix would you put in place (knowing that one fix doesn't fix everything).
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:51 PM
-4

I feel in a similar place, though I don't use the F word to describe myself. Most the time, it's not the what that I demean on here but the how. The methodology or complaint always seemed up in grievance against women (not even a specific woman in a specific situation).
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:45 PM
1

I literally talk to people for a living, my dude.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 04:14 PM
1

I didn't say that. I said: They don't trust him enough to tell him. Cuz he's just gonna fucking debate them about it.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 04:11 PM
0

You say that's what they all say, but that does not reflect the conversations I have among my friends and circles.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 04:48 PM
-2

Why should *some* people (not women, all white men) get to vote on if there should be slavery? When I've called out those women on their joke, they have more often than not said i was right and apologized. We're all trapped by a patriarchy that Men created — and we *all* need to do our part to break down. They're in a simulation that it's okay to grope men cuz all men want it. And they think that cuz ages of Men acted like it and determined that wanting all the sex is being a Man. Which traps th…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 04:05 PM
-1

that last part was a dig
/r/MensRights23/11/24 03:56 PM
-15

Really ignoring the actual message in my reply. C'mon man. Don't run from it! Stick to what was said: The state's right to do....what? I don't think you have a lot of women friends or fuck much. That's not an insult. I'm asking about your lived experience cuz it sounds like you don't hear what it's like to be a woman. And if the women in your life don't tell you about the gross shit in their life, it means they don't trust that you're going to listen. They think you're going to blame them or que…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 03:56 PM
-14

He wants to leave it up to the states....to do what? That's the exact argument the South had about the Civil War. "We just want states' rights!" The state's right to do what....? "Keep our slaves!" Trump doesn't care about abortion or states' rights. He cares about power. My family is closer to Trump's than probably anyone in this comment thread. So don't push back with no footing. Mhmm. Complacency for death is far from the same as getting angry about sexual rejection and murdering someone in t…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 03:51 PM
6

I look at your history and you seem to continuously post for others to give you arguments against errrr facts that show violence against women. Why do you struggle so hard to believe that that happens? And is any regular level of rape acceptable? Men and women should be coming together in consent culture to change the men and women around us. Not coming up with rhetorical devices to put down the reality of violence.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 03:22 PM
-18

The only difference i would say is: We don't have a documented history over thousands of years of disproportionate murder of men by women. So when they say 'it's not a literal mandate,' it's different than when people say Trump says things he doesn't mean even though he's already demonstrated through action that he could mean it. But the rhetoric is not helpful and doesn't lower the temperature, that's right. I just don't think it's on the people who are not in power to lower the temperature. I …
/r/MensRights23/11/24 02:49 PM
-11

No.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 02:09 AM
2

yeah you're having a different conversation than what i'm having. it's chill.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 05:20 PM
1

edited my comment for clarification
/r/MensRights21/11/24 05:15 PM
4

Yes, for sure. But i wonder if the stat holds true for abusing minors? Edit: I was reacting to the line about abused women not often raping adult men, but wondering if the stat line of abused going on to abuse, with women, came out more often with minors.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 04:40 PM
-7

I think a lot of men have a hard time believing these stats (even if they believe that they're a little inflated) because it's hard to accept that so many people — men and women — around them have been the victim of such shitty behavior or violence. It's also difficult to accept that you're bros with someone who is doing this to people. It's easier to wanna seek out a way to not believe it than to sit with that. I appreciate the difficulty of that paradigm shift.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 07:42 PM
-4

Oh god. Are trans rights going to be where I find common ground with more of this sub???? <3
/r/MensRights20/11/24 06:53 PM
0

The other irony is ignoring the existence of all these trans men. What she wants is a bathroom for cis women — and the rest of us get lumped into some other bathroom (even if they're not all men OR biologically male).
/r/MensRights20/11/24 03:34 PM
5

I'm sorry your therapist said that to you. Shouldn't have said that.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 02:06 AM
1

Can you elaborate on the 'more equal society = sharper division in labor'? Not trolling. Asking if you'd stretch that thought out more for me? When she says 'pay women more', it's not 'pay women more cuz they're women.' My understanding is it's 'pay women more than you're paying them cuz you're paying them less.' They talk to each other, and some men talk to them about what they're getting paid. There's historical residue on paying men more under the idea that 'he has a family to support.' It's …
/r/MensRights20/11/24 12:33 AM
2

I don't think it is. When people out here hear a woman make a scene and threaten to kill somebody....it's not okay. We do make sure to get it filmed for TikTok tho. Gotta get them views.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 10:50 PM
-1

Wait, wait. Why go back to my original comment? You can go to parent comment if you want to go unanswered. This sub-thread is for: Twitter ain't real life. Go touch the grass, sir.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 03:51 PM
1

It's really not, man. I used to think so too. Then I noticed over and over again: Oh, I'm around people who aren't always online so they have no idea wtf i'm talking about or the reference i'm making in a joke. It's like Trump. He keeps referencing weird fringe stuff at rallies that no one knows about. Like, I do....cuz i'm online too much. But he references stuff that only lives on Twitter or wherever the Q folk are hanging out these days. I'm being sincere man: Twitter ain't real life. And ano…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 03:25 PM
0

I hate edgelords. They're very lazy. You don't know me — but you could, cuz I'm not anonymous. I'll never know you — and no one ever will, Sakura_Drop. But hey, I invited you into a publicly accountable conversation. Oh well! Have a great day!
/r/MensRights18/11/24 02:15 PM
-1

Nah. It was meant for you. I'd be curious how much cum is backed up in your balls or dried up on your floor.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 02:05 PM
-1

Well, one of us uses his real name on here. So I'm not sure that makes you the more trustworthy fella, sir. Wanna publicly discuss with your real name on a show broadcast to a bunch of people? Have your opinion attached to your name on Google moving forward? You're invited on the podcast. Let's talk about what you're so worried about. Cuz then we could start believing you. Because you'd be accountable for your words.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 02:04 PM
-1

You know that Twitter isn't real life, right?
/r/MensRights18/11/24 02:03 PM
-3

The hazing, and the extreme loyalty at the expense of people they fuck over.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 09:31 PM
-5

Gosh. This is such an unfuckable comment. Willing to wager your sex stats support the claim.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 02:50 PM
-7

Why is it pandering and not what they think is right? If they were pandering, Roe would have been codified and the ERA added to the constitution forever ago. Either way, why be mad at women instead of the men who passed it? Duluth is not mainstream. It's not 'the plan.' It's a fringe philosophy like lesbian separatists. Relax. Focus on issues, not hating women.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 02:49 PM
2

oh gosh, i'm so glad to see a sane person not downvoted to hell in here.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:35 PM
0

uh..... how does she "earn it", anonymous username man?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:34 PM
-4

I'd add to her: If a guy of similar means refuses to let you pay for even half, don't go out with him again. If he believes she can't ever pay, I bet he doesn't care as much if she ever cums.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:33 PM
-1

What's a Tyrone?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:20 PM
0

Every county except Clark County.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:20 PM
1

decriminalizing*, but yup!
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:20 PM
8

Strange. I spend far less money by splitting the bill with her and get a lot more than 1 kiss per 2 dates. Maybe look at the psychographic of women you're attracted to? Y'all shit on feminists in here all the time but they're the ones who offer to pay or have no issue splitting first date drinks.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:19 PM
-3

Are you saying I'm just straight-up lying about my experience?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:08 PM
-35

I didn't say those words. So, you know. That makes you a poopyhead.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:30 AM
-2

Lemme shoot them a text. /s
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:16 AM
-49

duuuuude do you really wanna compare kill counts? These posts don't help men talk about DV at all. It only causes this sub to complain about women — who are, literally, not in power nor the majority of lawmakers who passed any of the laws that men on this sub complain about.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:36 AM
5

"Cry more!" and "men should cry/be more in touch with their emotions" are separate phrases, to be fair. "Cry more" or "Cry about it" has been a dismissal, totally. "Men should cry more" is not an extension of that.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:26 AM
-8

This has not been my experience with women who want men to be more in touch with their emotions. I cry like a motherfucker. I also fuck for a living. So, IDK. That's just me.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:25 AM
-54

Interesting. I hang around a lot of staunch feminists and I've literally never heard a single one make this point. I don't even really see this show up in my hyper-liberal sex-positive social media feeds. This is a fringe feminist belief. Truly all the women I talk to about this stuff say their heart breaks for male victims of DV.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:24 AM
1

I think so! Some need emotional support. Some need to understand consent that is more comprehensive than "no means no." And yeah some people are just evil. What're you doing to help other men be better?
/r/MensRights15/11/24 06:23 PM
-17

punctuation, my man. quit masturbating to slavery and give a proofread.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 04:56 PM
-20

Honey, I know about SPE. What was the gender of the person in charge of that? And the gender of the participants? The call is coming from inside the house.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 04:45 PM
-27

It makes me sad that you assume that an oppressed group would immediately return the same oppression. Would that be true for race relations if white people lost much of their positions of power? It leaves us with a very grim and hopeless future. Not one I choose to believe in.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 04:20 PM
1

So the other 14% of us will talk to the 86.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 03:29 PM
-16

This is the top post on my feed. I see incel stuff all over Twitter. What're you talking about?
/r/MensRights15/11/24 05:38 AM
5

For "an opinion," I agree, is extreme. But WHAT is the opinion? If he said he just thinking Black people are lazier — something trump said ("it's just a fact") — and that women should face a punishment for getting an abortion — something trump said in 2016 — then those are opinions worth leaving over. If the opinion is "I like the Eagles," that would be wild.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 01:13 PM
-2

I misread the beginning of your comment 👌 not sure how it applies cuz that woman is unwell. I'd have to see a LOT more examples of that for me to not correct OP that murder is not a likely consequence of being posted in that group. OP then admitted: he's a serial cheater.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 05:55 PM
0

How excited were you to find that lone article? Why are we ignoring the originating offense? There are social consequences to shitty behavior. If I tell you to fuck your mother while at a bar, if I get shoved or hit or the table of people want to not hang with me anymore, That's a consequence.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 04:03 PM
1

My chat's open if you wanna discuss. I think you have more control over yourself than you know man.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 03:15 PM
0

I don't think they literally want you dead. If they do, that's on them. And it's not the norm. I did keep count over my last 20 years. Made a career out of it dude. My name is attached to the word manwhore till the end of Google. Sounds like you need to be a more ethical slut. You don't get to decide what happens when you do shitty things. Maybe do less shitty things.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 02:46 PM
0

"any time"? I will wager that's literally not happening. Did this happen to you? Are we talking about you cheating on Emily dude? I think you're just speaking up because you cheated and got caught dude.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 02:37 PM
-1

What's the punishment? No one should be stalked or harassed. Being posted doesn't automatically mean you're being stalked and harassed. ALSO, when a dude who got caught cheating says he's being harassed....is he? Or is he getting messages from people who found out he cheated on them? Can you point to an instance of when a post in that facebook group led to someone losing work — that didn't have extenuating circumstances that totally make sense? Don't work so hard to defend shit behavior man. I'v…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 02:30 PM
-12

....did you get caught cheating in this group my guy?
/r/MensRights13/11/24 01:17 AM
6

We're not incapable of it, and I hope more dudes can feel more comfortable opening up to more dudes about their feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 08:34 PM
1

I think a cultural shift of vulnerability among Men will be important to get widespread attention for it. I haven't met one outspoken woman myself who, if I share my experience with her, isn't sympathetic. But if dudes only throw it out there as an adversarial move to counter or put down women talking about rape, it's going to go absolutely nowhere. We have to first act like it's okay to open up and safe to share — without it being about shutting down some woman's argument. IDK. Do we need a thr…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 06:15 PM
1

10% is pretty common for something so severe. But how we get to those statistics is difficult: under-reporting, definition of what we're recording. Very similar to assault/rape statistics. It's hard to tell, but it's enough to know it's not nothing. If Men could stop responding to the more prevalent issue of rape, it'll grant you good faith when you want to talk about the false accusations. FAs are not excusable, but let's all be invested in solving all these problems about consent. Which includ…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 06:02 PM
5

I read your pain dude. When it comes to "Women" and resources: I'm a professional podcaster (lol), under 6 foot tall, thin hair, chubby, low-income. My girlfriend understands there are months that are better for others. My various lovers have and continue to not expect tangible resources from me. Just a good time. And basic human decency. There's a lot else going on in your post and I read your pain. It's not fair. But Just like I'm not what one guy does, your ex-wife doesn't represent Women. I …
/r/MensRights11/11/24 09:57 PM
-2

Your perspective comes from defense. If you're her, how does she know you're not one of the 5%?
/r/MensRights11/11/24 08:17 PM
5

98% of people are not strong religious believers. What're you talking about? But IDK, talk to the majority Men who are in the positions of power to make those decisions dude.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 07:43 PM
0

The two are both incredibly valid issues. The issues, just because they involve being forced to do something you don't want to do, are not the same. and certainly don't have the same timeliness. I wish dudes on here would keep invoking one when advocating for the other, cuz all it does is muddy up an incredibly valid fair point. Then again, write your congressperson about overturning the SSA. Statistically, it's likely a man. Hopefully he'll listen to you. (I haven't heard more than one or two w…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 07:18 PM
-1

Will do. So are your stats US-based? And from where?
/r/MensRights11/11/24 04:27 PM
0

Syllable, bruh.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 04:25 PM
6

I need a subreddit with the MRA guys like you.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 04:18 PM
0

Heya. Are you in the US? And how old are you? (For frame of reference of the book)
/r/MensRights11/11/24 04:12 PM
-4

The motive for random attacks matter. If men could acknowledge that and stop fighting it, there'd be less need to constantly qualify with "but women....!" As for anonymity, it's a lot easier to say things when there's no accountability sir. I have to own my words. Wish folx in here had to too with the nonsense they spew, alter_furz.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 04:11 PM
-6

Getting randomly punch in the face is not the same as a divorce process or family court. Won't even try to say which is worse than the other. They are just different. This subreddit seems really attached to vague uncited data usually taken out of context in the pursuit of hating women. It's really weird. Quit looking outward. Look inward. What do I know? I is just a guy who has the sex life you want talking about men's rights under my real ass public name, alter_furz.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 04:04 PM
2

🥹
/r/MensRights11/11/24 03:40 PM
2

What're you doing here then? I thought I'd be a lonely brain.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 03:36 PM
1

MGTOW?
/r/MensRights11/11/24 03:34 PM
-7

But wouldn't the protection not be necessary if men weren't...you know....randomly attacking women? I thought they were rare exceptions....until I saw how many of my friends had truly bizarre male violence happen to them in the street or at work. Stuff that sounds unbelievable until the sheer volume says otherwise. No, I'm not impervious to gun shots and knife wounds. But maybe you're describing the women you go after? I fuck and date a lot. Like, publicly and professionally known to. And I don'…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 03:30 PM
2

Well, those aren't theys. They're whats. But those are YouTube pages, gotcha. Thanks.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 09:22 PM
11

But if she's 4B....how would you be on a date she doesn't intend....to go on?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 09:21 PM
1

Are these people? Books? YouTube pages?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 09:20 PM
-3

Dead bedrooms aren't a male issue though. I have female fans who talk to me about their dead bedrooms too. Instead of repeating points i already made, I'll just re-invite you into chat if you are struggling and need to talk — not debate. It's okay to ask for help, my dude.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 01:00 PM
-4

There's a presumption in that post you made that all of these dead bedroom men were paying the bills. It's not 'standing up for men.' Paying for bills and sex are not the same offering in a relationship. That would be in my reply if they hadn't taken it down. I'd also have asked if this was a general concern or if you were struggling with a dead bedroom and resented paying your house's bills. There are other less aggressive ways to tackle a dead bedroom than with threats of financial repercussio…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:35 PM
1

Did y'all notice that Dough Emhoff has participated in a variety of men-specific gatherings/groups/conversations, and I would not have been very surprised if his First Gentleman 'issue' would have been Men. I like to say Doug Emhoff exhibits 'modest masculinity.' The hell was Trump or Vance going to do about male suicide rates? Not a fucking thing.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:05 PM
-15

I'm really not, man. I'm like the only guy in this sub who operates under his real name, real account, that points to a decade of me publicly talking into microphones about my experiences. Who also periodically has on the women from those experiences. IDK. I wish dudes would treat women like I treat my car: If you don't know much, don't be shy listening to someone who knows more. Sigh.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:47 PM
-22

Weird. This just hasn't been my experience. I've gotten far more empathy from others and good faith from women....when I was being most empathetic. It's really not us vs. them. It's 'paternalistic traditionalism' vs. gender-neutral modernity. It's rich vs. poor. Focusing on women as adversaries is the same distraction rich men have put poorer men in for millenia: whether using race, religion, or side of the river as the dividing line.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:13 PM
4

The SO registry laws need such a vast update. And I can't imagine the political will it would take to get it done. I am so sorry this happened to you. Statutory rape laws are weird anyway. It's state-to-state, and don't make sense. Just make an interstate compact to get the ages lined up! Is it 18? is it 17? Romeo clause or no? But don't take your anger out on 'women.' This was 'one bitch of a mother.' After all, men made these laws to begin with.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:11 PM
1

for the first point: would you be upset seeing DEI initiatives to get more women into the more dangerous professions? for the last point: do you have any links for that? i saw that boys are scoring lower, but i've never seen research that says that teachers are grading boys more harshly because they are boys.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:12 PM
-7

Let's explore that. What's a predominantly male-dominated field with mostly female clients that you'd want to do a similar badmouthing about?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:28 PM
-10

As a dude who talks about sex for a living, I think I've learned a lot of valuable advice on being a better lover or attracting sexual partners by listening to sex workers. But if you're getting the sex you wanna have, I'm sure you don't need any advice.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:06 PM
-17

as a dude with an onlyfans himself considering the way dudes speak to *me* in my DMs... ...don't blame them for talking smack. Learn from their complaints on how to be a more decent human. They ain't exaggerating, as someone who checked out the other side.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:01 PM
0

This is interesting to read because all the sex-positive people I know specifically talk out against the conventional preferences, knowing that that guy is actually probably a monster. You go to a good orgy and it's a lot of different body types on both genders. I'm under six feet, chubby, thin hair, average dick and I kind of fuck for a living. Don't change your preferences. Just don't say that your standards are the standards, you know? Everyone's hot to someone, and it's okay if they're not t…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:08 PM
-6

It's not 'sexual harassment'. (They were applying make-up not addressing you.) But you should have gone to the security guard. 'Perverse' is extreme but they shouldn't have been in there.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 04:32 PM
0

I was raped by a woman. I don't get upset when it's presumed — the statistics *overwhelmingly* lean that way. But I *do* get upset when someone presumes that I hadn't been myself.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 12:27 AM
-4

At the end about the news media. I think the call is coming from within our house Cawlin.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:57 PM
-4

Oh. And who do you think were in the positions to make those decisions back then?
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:51 PM
-2

Got a link to any of that big news coverage? I'd be interested to read that.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:27 PM
-2

I've actually never heard that father's don't want custody. Only with specific people, but not about Men. My parents are divorced and I never heard those whispers. Someone — typically fathers — not paying child support, yes I've heard that plenty. But again, more about specific people trying to get out of paying. (Often because they were broke or because they were sticking it to the ex-wife.) You didn't hear about those who do pay the child support cuz, well, like Chris Rock jokes, "What do you …
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:14 PM
-2

I mean we could start with when the USA was formed and this new nation "moved forward", women had the right to vote in New Jersey. Then it was revoked. There are more examples of the country moving forward but X demographic being *purposefully* left behind exist. But does that prove I've "opened a history book" yet? Or maybe we can engage in sincere conversation where we use our words sincerely rather than just pumping out typical anonymous snark?
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:10 PM
6

I'm not sure that I've seen either presidential candidate ask about the draft. Not sure which way someone would vote if that was a top voting issue. It's also, you know, a congressional act so I would expect that someone knew the name of their US congressional candidates too if that's sincerely a voting issue. But yes, the draft sign-up in order to vote needs to be done away with.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:46 PM
-2

What about the gay draftees?
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:44 PM
-3

Oh really? Together? Not sure history supports that....
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:44 PM
-10

The previous couple hundred years.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 06:35 PM
3

Thank you for sharing!
/r/MensRights05/11/24 03:56 PM
0

Only because I don't know if a sincere post would get any visibility here: What are the issues around men and masculinity that most concern you that have nothing to do with complaining about women?
/r/MensRights05/11/24 03:36 PM
6

Is it impact or number of people? Which is it? Dick is one old powerless man who will have no say in her administration. The neo-Nazis are looking quite able-bodied. And they don't like you either, Kanye.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 03:29 PM
8

You're getting away from the reply to your reply. You said dick likes Kamala, so Kamala will bring us to war. That's just what you were saying (unless you're worried he's gonna influence her to shoot people in the face). So, Nazis like Trump. Why not apply your logic here? So cancel em both out or tell me that Trump may let Nazis influence his administration. It's not random Nazis. The like biggest Nazis do. You also didn't include this new qualification for who is a dangerous influence and who …
/r/MensRights05/11/24 03:21 PM
4

Actual Neo-Nazis endorse Trump. Should Jewish people hide??? When dick Cheney is being put in any kind of power, you could start stepping towards your thought process.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 02:53 PM
9

All this grievance shit in this sub distracts from talking about actual men's issues.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 02:40 PM
9

Reasonably self-evaluate to see if there are behaviors you do that are just objectively dick. Those aren't about being neurodivergent. Even we are capable of learning behaviors that are socially palatable. If it's all programs and scripts, ask yourself why your script isn't working socially.
/r/ExRedPill05/11/24 02:36 PM
14

Because it's not as direct or definitive the 'Kamala president to dead sons' pipeline. Trump is. The dead daughters has already been happening since some states fucked with abortion. They're dying now, really. Not theoretically. Also, don't you know there's a female senator in a wheelchair cuz SHE served our country in the Middle East??? There's not gonna be a draft. And we can March about it when that becomes even a Whiff of a maybe from the mouth of someone in power.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 02:34 PM
1

It's as if you're not a real person. Have a nice day. Anonymous Unaccountable username.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 03:53 PM
0

No. Because specifically trumps predominantly white men have already been repeatedly violent since he was first elected Trump is not simply 'GOP'.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 03:39 PM
1

If being left is terrifying to you, that's a generally weak sense of self.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 03:38 PM
1

i agree that Trumpism vs. Democracy is a very understandable dealbreaker. They should break up. Your immigrant wife this is #creepyaf broooooooo.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 02:17 PM
-18

Are they? Could someone send links cuz this post looked like OP mad at one random Twitter person. Which is like not a way to live life no matter what your opinion is on whatever issue. It's the internet.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:29 PM
0

It's difficult because I need to feel like I'm being heard as a person first, but who *also* isn't so much of a chickless-friends dude that he doesn't understand nuanced situations — so that he doesn't give *me* too much benefit of the doubt! Like I don't mind explaining a polyamorous term, but I wouldn't want a male therapist who I have to explain consent to. EDIT: If you get a complimentary call to feel each other out, great. But finding the right therapist sometimes just involves 1-3 sessions…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:22 PM
3

I'm guess I'm very liberal — but my positions are policy-to-policy. They just usually involve civil rights and are human/workers-first. But I definitely have my disagreements with other liberals. I'm 35-year-old, joined this sub in my early 20s. and on top of learning more information, I've lived more life and surrounded myself with more people who are not the all the same as me since getting here. And my views and opinions have adjusted with that added data and lived experiences.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:17 PM
-24

Why do you care what some random chick with <1000 followers says about Margot Robbie's kid? I had to tape through to see if she was like some influencer or prominent person I didn't know. Were there more posts like this that you forgot to link to? This feels so....nothing.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:12 PM
1

and let's remember whose decision it was: Call is inside the house. (Which is cool cuz We can fix it!)
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:52 PM
2

What were Women at-large leading/doing in the summer of 2020? I'm not sure which dozens of lefty killings you're referring to. Trump supporters have killed people since the beginning of his presidency. This is just one from the first year. You're going to say 'that's just one!' But there are more, and I'm simply disproving your statement that "none" have been killed by Trump supporters. If you say 'that's just one!' that's all that is needed to disprove 'none'. Also the whole agent provocateur t…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 04:22 PM
2

There's no coercion at play. There needs to be force or threat of force to be coercion. Even threatening to leave someone isn't 'force' or 'threat of force.' Threatening to hit your wife if she votes for someone you don't like *is* coercion. Just by using definitions. Sorry.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:07 PM
-5

How many women are we seeing camped out with rifles near polling centers? Dudes hitting women is insanely more common than the reverse. Dudes are the vast majority of people committing political violence. You seem to want to 'win' a position rather than engage with questions and data. Not gonna engage with bad faith nonsense. Sorry. I will have a private phone conversation if you wanna DM and arrange.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:06 PM
-32

Thanks! It's fun not going to an office in the morning!
/r/MensRights03/11/24 06:13 AM
-38

I didn't ask rhetorically. I'm asking you, sincerely. ❤️
/r/MensRights03/11/24 06:07 AM
1

I still think it's SO weird that various places vote for judges, especially in a partisan way.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 05:33 AM
-47

Yeah but you gotta ask *why*. Which policies are so important that they're saying that? And is there a policy that applies in the reverse? This is critical thinking. Let's play it out.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 05:23 AM
-35

Because a lot of women fairly fear being punched in the face by their husbands, particularly when Trump supporters have specifically used violence to solve political differences. So it's more like: When you live with a supporter of political violence, you fear the violence at home.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 05:22 AM
1

I'm really sorry that happened to you man. I really am. People shouldn't have reacted like that. People should have taken care of you.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 04:36 AM
-15

And a bunch don't even mean it. They just think that's what they're supposed to say. And where'd that come from? Less emotionally available Men who raised them. Who were raised by Men who wanted them to be the manliest, whatever that meant (hypersexuality, for one thing). So like....I see this sub pissed about things that are traditional gender roles. And those TGR were perpetuated by those in power and those in power were.... I just want this sub to understand that the call is coming from insid…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:50 AM
0

They measure generations in 20ish year increments. So it's literally a generation ago. Fatlip's a fun song. Some dude was playing it on the train the other day :)
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:19 AM
1

We literally thought being gay was bad and that you should be allowed to discriminate based on it. Yeah dude. Society changes. People change. I know I have.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:17 AM
-38

So do we blame Men for this?
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:11 AM
0

Curious how old you are OP? Not to disrespect you. Just context. This felt like a random reach back into time? A Sum41 music video isn't what I'd use to showcase contemporary values.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:06 AM
-2

So who do you want to be mad at for this?
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:03 AM
-5

It was a guy. And the band members are all guys. You're not wrong. It's just like....and the people who did it were men. EDIT: OP originally said "I don't know" before editing his comment.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 02:57 AM
-11

Hm. What was the gender of the director or decision maker on this?
/r/MensRights03/11/24 02:54 AM
2

According to JD Vance, it does.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 02:45 AM
1

I don't think the patriarchy is — by evidence or by definition — favoring women. Yes, if there's ever another draft, all adults should be able to be drafted without prejudice. It's outdated and not updated but also may just become a zombie law...we've never seen those resurrected to be misused against the public right?! =gets texts from women in Arizona= Oh....
/r/MensRights02/11/24 02:33 PM
2

So men are....oppressing men? Sometimes I gotta think: this isn't a gender war, it's a class war. Cuz rich men seem to be doing *fine*.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 02:19 PM
-8

Like this comment right here is the exact reason you're not getting laid or dating as much as you want. Encapsulated in one comment.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 12:50 PM
0

People literally did not vote for it to be illegal. There have been zero referendums to ban abortion that have passed. I'm not sure what Trump sanewashing you're reading. It's been effectively banned in multiple states by exclusively Republican legislatures.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 12:50 PM
-14

It HAS been banned in various states. What're you talking about? Also, it's logical to not date you if that's how you view the people you wanna date.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 05:47 AM
-18

And why do you think that is?
/r/MensRights02/11/24 05:28 AM
1

Tell me about the piano!! I do notice this in a lot of American society. I was told recently that in other cultures, it's considered rude to ask someone you just met what they do for work. That's like....one of the first three questions anyone asks anyone in the states! Whether it's dating or meeting new friends, I don't need to get all the trivia right away. Let's just fucking connect. Some of the trivia will drip out in a more interesting way. And the information I wanna know, I'll ask when it…
/r/MensRights02/11/24 03:47 AM
46

Parallel to this: I always found the absolute 'women and children off the boat first' policy was strange.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 03:14 AM
0

Yes, this was true during Trump's presidency. Trump men are more open to dating date liberal women than liberal women are open to dating Trump men. Lot of research was done on this 2017-2020. Something about abortion rights.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 03:11 AM
3

Isn't weird that men are in charge and yet they're not advancing these men's rights?
/r/MensRights02/11/24 03:06 AM
2

I didn't think you were saying men should hurt women. I just said it's a sad place to settle on how the world has to be.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:56 PM
-9

Point 7 makes me feel really sad. It's something I feel like I see on the alt-right. "Well we do shitty things...cuz you would if you could!" Would they? Does it have to be this combative them vs. us based on identity markers none of us picked? Cuz then IDK how race relations, queer vs straight, gender relations, or religious differences ever become peaceful. I was raised to think 'two wrongs don't make a right.' Someone has to be decent first. And women have been FAR kinder to me at-large — and…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 05:34 PM
2

Well being a teen mom isn't 'victim.' Though it could be. Just like being a teen dad doesn't make you a victim. But you could be one. I think it's mostly cuz there was a tv show. Also? Yeah the whole gestating a human inside of you is tougher than not having it gestate inside of you. So that's gonna be prioritized. Cuz you can die from it. You can't die from your girlfriend being pregnant.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 03:28 PM
4

The people most outspoken about giving felons their voting rights back are Democrats. So much so, Fox News in previous elections used to say Dems are for that cuz they think felons are mostly Dems (not because maybe they served their time and should get their voting rights back). When the people of Florida voted on a referendum to give felons their voting rights back in 2016 (?), Republicans were mad. So the GOP-controlled state house passed a law requiring that felons who serve their time can o…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 01:59 PM
0

Thanks on that! I didn't know what to search because I wasn't sure what you were getting at. As for the rest of your comment: I wasn't talking about who should vote for who. I, based on your concern for felons not being able to vote (and being disproportionately male), sincerely asked you to ask yourself two questions. And I still propose those two questions for you to ask yourself. That's all. Just ask and answer a couple questions to yourself and then enjoy your Friday!
/r/MensRights01/11/24 01:35 PM
4

Heya. Why are you assuming 90% of that 4.4 million are men? I didn't see anything gendered in the webpage. But you might be referencing a well-known stat I don't know about. You reference team red and team blue....but I'd ask yourself this question: Which 'team' (party) has been advocating for enfranchising felons after they've served their sentences? And which 'team' kept felons disenfranchised in Florida after the People voted to give them their voting rights back?
/r/MensRights01/11/24 01:17 PM
2

This is exactly what I'm trying to say!!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 02:34 PM
2

I went down on five different women and let them review me after I let the room on a podcast episode. I was 4 for 5. Dudes can figure it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 01:46 PM
0

huh wouldn't you also avoid someone likely to rape you? isn't that what every prison rape joke is about??
/r/MensRights30/10/24 11:31 PM
0

This is a headline, but is it real? We should look deeper! I clicked the link, and it's a 'healthcare news' content site. It's not affiliated with an official health organization or academic research institution that I could tell. Looks like they're a content spot hoping for clicks using good SEO. Healthcare is a big advertiser online. Get your site's stats up enough, you can get some good $$ from your ads. Not 'bad', just not going to get my undying trust without some back-up. (I do like that t…
/r/MensRights30/10/24 02:08 PM
0

Yeah! And why bring up a remake that isn't happening just to stir up gender ire?
/r/MensRights30/10/24 12:43 PM
-1

seems like a rumor — which could just be people on social media saying they would like to see that. not sure why OP gotta bring up a remake that isn't on any serious path at the moment. source: https://ihorror.com/all-female-fight-club-reboot-rumors-get-viral-traction/
/r/MensRights29/10/24 02:56 PM
-10

I think you're talking about some isolated examples. If we analyzed sequels at-large over =pick your time range=, I don't think the data would support what you're feeling.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 02:55 PM
0

Condoms are 99% effective preventing pregnancies when used correctly. They're about 66% effective when used incorrectly, which is about the same as pulling out. It's your dick. No one can force you to enter without a condom....if they do, it's rape.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 01:07 PM
-9

lol lead with that 😭
/r/MensRights29/10/24 04:03 AM
-11

I'll pose the same request as I did to OP: got a link to a reputable source?
/r/MensRights29/10/24 04:01 AM
-2

If you rank the risk of death of the two — raising a child vs. birthing a child — abortion is the more critical concern. Just get it done! Not being willing to be patient is this weird male trait i see over and over and over and over again....for people who have ruled most of the world for thousands of years We're awfully insistant that our grievance get taken care of first.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 03:41 AM
0

I'm saying: I don't think it's safe to assume dudes in this sub are overwhelmingly pro-abortion — unless they got their issue taken care of at the exact same time. I see a lot of dudes not want to put their wants second be a similar issue in their sex & dating lives. They're so worried about getting their nut off that they don't care as much about hers....when caring about hers first would result in all the nuts they could wanna pop off. Sigh.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 03:36 AM
-5

It's not a given in this sub.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 03:30 AM
-4

Yes. Money is not 'bodily autonomy' just like 'corporations aren't people' (no matter what SCOTUS says). 'Having' a child is said meaning 'birth' a child. I think 'paying for a child' is just going to be clearer, efficient communication if you wanna discuss the issue rather than argue with people online (not that you're arguing with me right now). Politically? Aligning with abortion right is the best pathway towards paper abortion. Be willing to go second, and you'll get to go. Insisting you go …
/r/MensRights29/10/24 03:24 AM
-12

Of that 30% of the time, how often is the mistake corrected before anyone leaves the hospital? Do you have a link to a stat on that claim? I've never heard that one before.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 03:15 AM
-6

Not the basic idea. I think it has to do with: You shouldn't have to grow and carry and push out a whole ass organism if you don't want to. One thing at a time though. Support abortion rights — then this topic can be seriously discussed!
/r/MensRights29/10/24 02:22 AM
-2

I think this could be looked at once the bodies doing the pregnancies are protected. Order of operations. Use condoms. That should be part of your sexual practice regardless my man. Peeing fire sucks.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 02:21 AM
0

I'm not shit kicking or patronizing when I ask this. I'm just curious as a frame of reference: how old are you?
/r/MensRights27/10/24 04:55 PM
0

bruh have you ever fought with a fitted sheet with a baby screaming at you? i've only done one of these at a time. i'd scream if i had to handle both at once.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 04:07 PM
1

So is rape tolerated or not tolerated?
/r/MensRights27/10/24 04:51 AM
1

You seem to already have them, don'tcha.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 04:17 AM
1

We are all literally tolerating an adjudicated rapist as a presidential candidate right now.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 04:16 AM
1

To ask is literally to pose a question. You can't ask without asking a question. Sigh.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 04:13 AM
1

It's actually not legal in any jurisdiction, and the FBI changed their definition of late to be inclusive of male victims sometime in my 20s or while in college. They had to add 'made to penetrate'. For your first sentence: Rape was a crime but being married meant people people didn't really believe you. "What? You don't want to have sex with your husband? You don't LOVE your husband?!" There's a fetishization for ignoring lived experience in this subreddit. It is illegal to shoot and kill an un…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 04:40 PM
1

Legislation had to get explicit because society/judges/police/anyone in charge had a hard-ass time believing a woman who said she was raped by her husband. "How? It's....her husband." What's on paper is not always what's in practice. We had a founding document that said "all men are created equal" but.....then we had slaves at the same time. There needs to be more acceptance that history is often written by who is in power and who is in power is not always honest. Can you imagine a man claiming …
/r/MensRights26/10/24 04:36 PM
1

We can really go back and forth trading snapshot and opposing research. It's a complicated topic in the present day, let alone contextualizing ancient civilizations where words also meant different things. Also, **for the history of mankind**, laws on the books didn't always match up with the tolerance of certain crimes by certain kinds of people. This subreddit could appreciate that with all the lady teacher rape talk. These are interesting examples for me to check out. Thanks! What I'm confuse…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 03:18 PM
4

I'm confused and can't tell who's misgendering: OP or the Perth outlet. Hard to follow what happened to whom and which prison is going on. But yeah, an FTM person should be in a male prison.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 03:13 PM
2

Fingers crossed for your daughter. However, she gets the bag to get to school. 🫰
/r/MensRights24/10/24 09:38 PM
1

I mean, it could be two scholarships but they would be hard to fill with such few people competing. Right? And the idea is to go after one of those because there's less competition. I don't know the answer to that question but I remember hearing a reasonable answer once.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 09:37 PM
6

It is true. There's also far less women in rowing, for example. And a lot of the other sports have smaller rosters. Men's sports suffer from a big ass football team eating much of the scholarships too. Basketball doesn't cause this problem, for example, cuz the rosters are smaller like most other programs. It really is football, now that I think about it. I never realized how much that one sport (my favorite, for the record) eats up in the scholarships department. In theory, a chick can get a fo…
/r/MensRights24/10/24 08:31 PM
-2

This is truly what keeps me from trying to be a full-on 'dating coach' or expert or whatever, even when journalists try to call me that. Any of these dudes who give tips that revolve around how someone not getting laid is because of women is such a weak ass punk. And I wouldn't be able to work with a client who thought there was any validity to that. That's why my only clients — few, as I don't really incorporate that into my 'brand — are the ones willing to acknowledge chicks' realities, to loo…
/r/ExRedPill24/10/24 08:28 PM
-1

brb gotta blow your dad
/r/MensRights24/10/24 02:45 AM
-1

She's not going to have sex with you just because you defended her. She didn't even have a wiki. I had to find info on her from a wiki on 'honey badgers'. IF she knows more about gender than anyone you know, you need to meet more people. She's self-taught and unpublished. She may know things and have her opinions....but she's not an academic. Kinda concerned for your community college if you as a professor think she's smarter than allllll the professors you know. You must reallllllly want to fuc…
/r/MensRights24/10/24 02:26 AM
1

LOL you got downvoted for correcting me, guy they also downvote to hell. Thanks for that!
/r/MensRights24/10/24 02:06 AM
0

Okay. A random YouTuber's quote? She's not an academic, a historian, an author on the subject...not sure how her opinion or read on the history is different from most of us here? It's also impossible to generalize for all of history all over the world. Example: I won't pretend that I know how eastern cultures, african cultures, south american (mayan, incan, aztec) operated on this issue during much of their history. it's important for us to acknowledge blind spots to have a discussion. Cuz i'm n…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 09:45 PM
-8

that's great! Isolated examples (that I'd have to look at myself to check the context) doesn't disprove overall trends. Of course, there were some societies that were women-led — though few.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:43 PM
-7

That's really interesting, cuz from the Bible to historical texts — not modern era interpretations of said texts — they're referred to as property. Which sources DO you believe if not the actual texts? Not rhetorical. Even in this sub or in my 10+ years talking about sex for a living, I haven't seen this take before.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:42 PM
-3

Hmm. Do you think there hasn't been......a lot of rape? Curious what you mean by misrepresentations. Like marital rape wasn't even a crime until like what, the 70s? (And that goes for rape against either gender within a marriage.)
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:40 PM
1

Who is being downgraded despite scoring well??? That's not happening in any normal academic setting! I can name an example. And it's not insidious. Can you??
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:20 PM
-6

Separate comment: I'm super curious about your curiosity about this. Are you in school and were assigned this reading? Or something else?
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:17 PM
-13

For a very very long time it was treated like an affront to a man's property, not a personal violation. Women weren't really citizens especially once they were someone's wife. Not only about this but I'm currently reading Sex and the Constitution. first two parts talk about sex and the law in ancient and earlier civilizations (that would inform and influence the USC). Talks about it, and it's something I've read plenty before.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:17 PM
2

What're one or two specific changes/adjustments you'd make in young education? When we had a couple thousands years of men being the only ones allowed to school, what changed that men could totally do course work and focus then but now apparently we can't? Thanks for actually having something to say that isn't wrapped up in resentment.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 01:24 PM
-7

That's a fallacy. The article shared higher up in this thread said that there were certain attributes that made for a good student. Those attributes *happened to be* more prevalent with girls — not exclusively girls. But you wouldn't say that boys are lacking and then say "well we should change what a good student is." The whole point is: How do we instill these attributes — that are not 'female attributes' but 'good student attributes' — in boys? I asked a different commenter which specific tea…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 01:11 AM
1

There's really no way she actually believes everything she says. It's ragebait. "Women shouldn't vote," like.......i think a lot (hopefully most?) in here don't even think that.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 12:58 AM
-3

You really did not get specific. You just said "teaching methods" without saying which ones. And you've not once mentioned any historical shift in gendered academia.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:35 PM
-5

Get specific. And how do you explain all of human history with all-male historians until the modern era? Is it possible WE should be raising sons differently? Or did we at some part of history start having a chemical difference that caused just the boys to not be able to pay attention during english class? The whole argument to keep women out of school was that only men could handle the concentration of study. So, the questions are: what specifically would engage boys more? how do you explain th…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:33 PM
-5

Kinda wanted to hear it in your own words rather than see links idk if you read. I wanna know what YOU think.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:18 PM
-5

What's the teaching method(s) you think will help boys, specifically?
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:15 PM
-26

But they're not favoring what's more common (or more socialized) in girls because they're girls. I'd think that if we put those attributes in bullet points, we'd all say that those make for a better in-class young student regardless of gender. So let's teach boys to be that way! We are very capable of rising above whatever hormonal or genetic beliefs you have about gender. We're responsible for our behaviors. Like it feels as if you're arguing AGAINST 'pay attention in school.' Maybe you can tel…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:15 PM
-36

Thanks! Appreciate the better link! And it even disproves OP. The difference in grading had nothing to do with teacher bias, according to your link. It had to do with boys underperforming in certain metrics. Call them 'non-aptitude' maybe? I'm dumb so maybe that's the wrong word choice. I remember this discourse from a decade ago. "The authors attribute this misalignment to what they called non-cognitive skills, or 'how well each child was engaged in the classroom, how often the child externaliz…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 09:21 PM
-33

not sure i'm taking Catholic Lane dot com as a reliable source.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 07:39 PM
3

I will agree with #2: good orgies are filled with a wide variety of people....getting it. But whatever your look, an ugly soul will not help.
/r/ExRedPill22/10/24 07:12 PM
0

anxious attachment style and lack of trust from either that relationship or prior relationships. frankly, when i date i can see what she went through with guys before her. instead of being mad about it, i see if she can engage with the observation and often they'll open up about where certain defenses came from that caused certain behaviors with me, guy who didn't do anything. then i try to address the needs there, if i can, and then we can have a very fun more relaxed first date. sometimes they…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 06:17 PM
9

therapy
/r/ExRedPill21/10/24 02:46 PM
7

of yours? i don't know you. i could only speculate (and i won't).
/r/ExRedPill21/10/24 02:31 PM
9

Of course you don't want to feel that anger/pain. That's why you posted here. The why that you're angry is not other people fucking. It's an emotion you're feeling but don't want to feel — so you feel anger instead. And talking to a professional about the source of that pain (again, not the other people fucking) is the only way you'll find some peace. I hope for you the courage to talk about this with your therapist. <3
/r/ExRedPill21/10/24 02:16 PM
10

If it's truly rage that you're feeling, therapy to look at the source of that rage (pain) will do you so much good. Anger is a secondary emotion, and when I've felt angry (vs just run of the mill upset), identifying why I'm angry (not what happened) has been such a crucial first step to prevent blowing up.
/r/ExRedPill21/10/24 02:11 PM
4

ditto. the point of therapy is having a safe outlet to share toxic things so you don't have to worry about losing friends or family or colleagues over it.
/r/ExRedPill21/10/24 02:11 PM
2

If not with the therapist, with whom? Maybe a different therapist would be helpful.
/r/ExRedPill21/10/24 02:10 PM
-3

Heya Peter. You can left brain at me all you want. You should still try therapy.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 12:08 PM
-1

Fuck me. I just listened to what the experts say. My bad. The anonymous stranger on Reddit is the mental health expert. 👌
/r/MensRights21/10/24 03:16 AM
-7

That's interesting. I've always been a pretty emotional guy. I cry. I share how I feel. I listen to how others feel. I also like football, fucking, and fried food. So I have a hard time relating to your generalization of Men. Maybe I'm special? It's okay to emote differently, as you say, so long as you're not emoting with your fist through the wall or by hurling aggression at a partner instead of saying, "I'm hurt." And most therapists — any good therapist — is trained in a variety of types of e…
/r/MensRights20/10/24 10:49 PM
-10

I don't think anyone's making it a religion. But when we socialize men to not be in touch with their emotions and men face higher rates of suicide because they were told they can't talk about our emotions and women complain about men not being emotionally intelligent in their relationships and less women are willing to date and get married if it means dealing with men who aren't emotionally working on themselves i'd say therapy isn't a bad idea. the 'religion' part of it is just women pleading w…
/r/MensRights20/10/24 09:56 PM
-7

strange cuz both my individual and group therapists are men and growing up, I saw a male psychologist. I've gotten a lot out of it. have you ever tried it yourself?
/r/MensRights20/10/24 09:19 PM
-12

cuz therapy is dope and we were socialized to think it's dumb.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 08:17 PM
-19

The only way to get past that is to....go to therapy. I promise. Therapists also can offer insight and perspective that your best bro just can't. It's not even about picking. It's about having all of those resources available. I couldn't recommend therapy more for guys. And, yes, being in therapy will improve your dating life full stop.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 08:17 PM
2

Decriminalization, but yes. Needs to happen! It's a local government issue but states should get on it!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 01:41 AM
1

Thanks for giving me a reason to look this up again. Hadn't realized there'd been so much progress on this! Back when it was an 'issue' in NYC, the situation was different. Glad to see courts recognize this. And I agree on the purposeful usage. Just didn't have a pithy agreeable comment for that. I guess we'll have to wait to see how it's all used — BUT....i think those who like the peen are owed some backpay on-screen showings. Considering all the...you know...not all the pussy onscreen has bee…
/r/MensRights15/09/24 09:35 PM
-6

There is a point to be made that full frontal female nudity is far more common than full frontal male. I'm not sure why there would be pushback against this director saying that there's an intention to show more wang? I would agree with the tits ≠ genitals except that in much of the country, women legally can't show their tits in the same public places men are allowed to. I live in NYC and we have what is called 'topless equality.' If you had that in more of the country than not, this point woul…
/r/MensRights15/09/24 09:25 PM
0

The one i referenced, that I did under a different commenter? Or this comment here? I reread this one and it seems fine. What's your confusion?
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:14 PM
5

right. so i'm saying it should be decriminalized so that NEITHER is arrested.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 06:01 PM
2

what do you mean by 'wrong thing'?
/r/MensRights26/08/24 05:10 PM
6

This is called 'end demand' or the Nordic model. It doesn't really work for keeping sex workers safe. Almost to a person, SWers want full decriminalization. Clients and providers should be able to negotiate what they want to privately. Trafficking would still be illegal (because that's rape and kidnapping, not sex work which is inherently consensual). Pimping would be redefined to actually only mean pimping. You say "feminists" but they're not a monolith. Third/fourth wave feminists who are pro-…
/r/MensRights26/08/24 03:01 PM
23

i'm gonna do a comment, but the SWers almost to a person do not want 'end demand' prosecution of clients. Cuz you know....makes clients scared. Which then makes the whole thing *still* unsafe for the sex workers.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 02:59 PM
1

were you pro or neutral before the turn?
/r/MensRights29/07/24 02:53 PM
-1

honestly, relieved to see that *someone* else noticed that too
/r/MensRights28/07/24 05:48 PM
0

Because studies of nofap, MRA, and incel communities show a strong overlap with anti-semitisim, homophobia, and misogyny. People here saw that and went 'yeah but not a big deal' or 'yeah, valid concern.'
/r/MensRights28/07/24 05:47 PM
1

Side conversation for the sub maybe: anti-circumcision is a popular topic in here. who in this subreddit is *pro* or *neutral* on male circumcision??
/r/MensRights28/07/24 03:54 PM
0

well, the only thing i'll definitely say is: being circumcised won't make him 'mistaken for a Jew.' It's very common. I'm cut and fully gentile (Italian heritage!). Feels weird that you're 'afraid' he'd be mistaken for a Jew though.....
/r/MensRights28/07/24 03:53 PM
-5

I get that. But it's also been my actual job for like a decade. So instead of bragging about how i am in bed, i tried to keep it to: i've probably been with more women than such and such a person. Which means I think my opinion holds a little more weight than the guy (not necessarily *you*, OP) who doesn't have much sex but has a strong opinion on women's sexuality. IDK how else to communicate that I've got a....more informed opinion. (Open to suggestions btw!) So, putting that aside, i'd love t…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 03:47 PM
-6

I see a lot of this resentment in the sub about women trying to get money out of men. Maybe I'm just confused, but I kind of have sex for a living. And I've pretty much always been low-income. Literally not one woman or ex-girlfriend viewed me as a financial solution. Most of them had their own great jobs and salaries (and others were hustling laborers or artists like me). Slight side line item: i think it's going to be tough for any guy to have relationships with women who know better if they v…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 02:01 PM
6

Having a high libido is fine. Viewing women — or men — as a means to sexual ends is not. Many dudes see chicks as access to sex instead of sex as something to connect and collaborate on. I've been with a lot of women. (IDK. Look me up.) They complain to me in between rounds about dudes who are selfish and inadequate in bed. Yes, they would want to fuck more if they thought the sex was gonna be any good. Last night, a gal told me that she stopped trying to get laid because she'd rather use a vibr…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 01:34 PM
8

Lesbians have the highest levels of mutual sexual satisfaction in bed.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 01:29 PM
3

That sounds stressful. I really don't think you need to worry about people making up stories. Remember that anonymous accounts aren't really a Facebook thing. The worse version will probably be comments about your appearance. You can totally say it makes you uncomfortable. Or request that she not post it as an accusation but more like "I'm curious" (so that possible friends or family don't see it and think your gf actually has reason to think you're cheating.) Another version could be: "LOL babe…
/r/MensRights12/07/24 04:14 AM
-9

if you wouldn't say all that you say on here with your real name, this isn't real life.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 03:55 PM
-1

Hold on hold on. I asked a specific question.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 03:30 PM
-2

Would you agree that not *every* sentence of *every* comment on Reddit is directed *at* the parent comment or OP?
/r/MensRights05/07/24 03:07 PM
-13

You're misrepresenting who I targeted in my final sentence.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 02:59 PM
16

This battle of 'whose rape is worse' is so sad and so unhelpful. Sigh.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 02:45 PM
-28

It's the point of your first graph. Let me secondly say: I'm really sorry to hear about your friends. It *does* suck and I'm sorry to hear you didn't feel supported in that relationship about it. It is a growing trend, suicide among men, and I think part of it is not knowing where to fit in in a changing society when we've bene sold a rigid framework of what a 'Man' is supposed to be. Feeling a lack of purpose can put a guy in a dark place. Especially when expressing vulnerability or going to th…
/r/MensRights05/07/24 02:04 PM
-36

social media is not real life.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 01:27 PM
1

(i'm not seeing a link anywhere.) I'd be very curious how old you are, how long you felt like you were vulnerable for, and who specifically in your life told you it was bad to be emotional, and if you're in therapy. None of this is to dig at you. This is coming from sincere concern. (as for MM: any of those you listed are hardly delivering the same thing, and even within any one of those is there a singular ethos. especially those that are algorithmic social media feeds, your feed is your feed —…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 11:26 PM
-1

Paper abortions? (i don't know what that is) Poll after poll shows that an overwhelming majority of Americans think abortion should be decided between a woman and her doctor, that abortion should be available in 'all or most situations'. The PO has already shifted. The politics of it are disproportionate based on how the gov is set up.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 06:48 PM
2

What do you mean by mainstream media? That's so broad and vague. The news? TV/movies? Articles? The generalizations about men have been made, in large part, by men. We've until the last few decades had control over the microphones. That's why they say toxic masculinity (not simply 'masculinity') harms men too. If we're all told it's 'gay' to be emotional, then we get nervous to experience deeper connections with each other. Yes, many overcome that young barrier. Some do so proudly. Some quietly,…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 06:46 PM
-1

Just because 'most' (or a perceived most) are for something doesn't make it right. No?
/r/MensRights02/07/24 06:40 PM
2

You know who also has to have complete consent before coitus? Women. I'm curious what your sex and dating life is like. A lot of dudes who don't get laid much or feel trapped in one single monogamous relationship have a lot of opinions about women having sex. I just talk about this stuff for a living, so that's my observation, Wilson.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 06:22 PM
1

I just asked a question.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 06:20 PM
0

Yes. What also happened in the the 1960s? Women's liberation movements, women wanting to be more independent, women wanting to enter the work force, demanding equal pay. Marital rape was still legal in the 60s. So yeah. When women were en masse insisting on bodily autonomy, people became more vocal about abortion rights. To be blind to the context of what you're saying doesn't paint the whole picture. Yes, prior to 1813 many across the polo cal spectrum were for slavery! Crazy! (granted, the sla…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 06:20 PM
3

OP's partner is just as careless. and i'd be curious, if condoms weren't used, who instigated that choice (even if both 'agreed' — though consent can be murky depending on the circumstances, as happens in college among young adults who mostly weren't taught sex ed)
/r/MensRights02/07/24 04:17 PM
0

what about he should....inquire if a prospective partner is on birth control? be sure to use a condom *correctly*?
/r/MensRights02/07/24 04:16 PM
-3

I know this is the popular answer in this sub. That's fine. QUESTION: If a guy doesn't ask if she's on birth control, instigates not using a condom/just-the-tipping/knows it broke but kept going, and doesn't ask about her feelings about getting pregnant beforehand — this combination of factors — should we have the same financial sympathy for someone show showed reproductive disregard? This isn't rhetorical. I'm not shitposting. I'm bounds-testing. For anyone who thinks that sounds unrealistic, I…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 04:15 PM
1

just out of curiosity for all the guys who of course brought up financial obligations: did y'all use a condom? if not, who instigated not using a condom? only curious.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 04:12 PM
2

If you 100% don't want to give birth, it's 100% not his say. If you're on the fence, then there's information from him to obtain...but the words of a college-aged guy (or any gendered person) only holds so much weight....
/r/MensRights02/07/24 04:12 PM
3

Men have been raised to 'get theirs', to achieve, to win. We've raised generations of men to think that being tapped into your feelings — empathy included — is gay or feminine. And we've taught them that men want sex all the time and fucking shows the prowess of a man. SO we have boys viewing sex as something to 'get' instead of as an experience to have with another human being (or beings). Then they're not thinking about the other person as much as they're thinking about the tangible things the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 01:25 AM
3

I'm not tapped into the Libertarian Party's world. Any specifics you'd point to to them going 'off the rails'?
/r/MensRights01/07/24 01:21 AM
3

Title IX *is* great and helpful for getting women's school orgs on par with the men's — but that Obama-era mandate was such a mistake when it came to sexual assault. It made administrators and professors in charge of figuring out if crimes happened. Sucked for everyone involved. Those employees didn't sign up for that, and it caused schools to sway hard toward the accused or towards the accusers instead of....trying to deal with the nuance of messy gray area consent violations among people new t…
/r/MensRights01/07/24 01:20 AM
1

This isn't a who's worse, it's a they're different. We shouldn't force births. We should rape or coerce anyone into sex, including men. Though this conversation has nothing to do with abortion. The empathy gap exists among men in that we generally score lower on EQ tests than women — even though they haven't found a piece in the brain to explain it. If you want more empathy, you may need to start by practicing it.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 03:12 PM
0

Men could abandon a child with the same safe haven laws. Guess what? If you and me could get pregnant, we'd have free contraception available and abortion would be legal. The topics of reproductive coercion (not corrsion) is real. Men being raped is real — it happened to me. The FBI has already redefined rape to include 'being made to penetrate.' Consent culture includes enthusiastic consent — which tackles coercion. We're included in that cultural conversation. And those topics are separate fro…
/r/MensRights29/06/24 02:15 PM
1

Yes, whoever is carrying the fetus inside their own body should decide. Comparing financial cost to the physical toll of pregnancy doesn't work. I think you should talk to more women about their pregnancies — not as a debate, simply to gather experiential information. Some of what you talk about at the very end are *separate* but *valid* conversations to have. But they're separate. In the meantime, wrap it up or stick to banging women on birth control.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 01:46 PM
1

It's a fetus. Not a child. Every major medical organization says so. And i think you should ask more women in your life about the daily toll of pregnancy. Forcing anyone to give birth sounds fucking horrid. I think you're trying to compare different things to each other. I'm not saying what you're totally wrong — I think you're wrong comparing these.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 01:43 PM
-1

I agree with this or with making women register too. AND it's not a real tangible right now concern about our bodies, as there is no imminent threat of conscription. There hasn't been once since they did it in 'Nam. So, in fairness, both are fair to be concerned about. One of them is happening every single day and the other is still a hypothetical concern/policy correction to be made.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 08:10 PM
-2

The day that we have the technology to take an embryo, safely and easily, from her to put inside of the man who wants to keep it, i am super down for that public conversation about terminating half-wanted pregnancies. That would be fair.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 07:29 PM
0

Correct. Cuz you're not carrying it. You could decide to....wear a condom.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 07:29 PM
-1

I think for as long as abortion is a partisan issue — unlike in the past when both parties had elected leaders feeling differently — it will always be sexist to vote for people who run on limiting or eliminating a woman's right to choose.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 07:20 PM
1

As a dude who's overweight, balding, low income, and averagely endowed who has a lot of sex, there's a far more nuanced and efficient way than....broad spectrum. Approach who you actually want. Seek connection, not coitus. Treat women like people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 07:47 PM
3

All of that! Yes! Representing some situations, and not many others.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 05:36 PM
-1

That's quite the binary. One relationship in all spectrum between one nightstand and dating for 10 years. Even in a serious relationship, different single moms have different needs. Not all of them need a partner to play father. Now all of them need the guy to play provider. And some do.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 05:25 PM
0

Who was talking about raising another person's kid? We're talking about dating single moms. Not always or even most often the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 05:10 PM
9

like you often see with men, it's a lot of thinking about oneself without thinking about anyone else. i always respect that the kid is far more important than me, guy who showed up three months ago. if i'm dating someone for multiple years and the kids are grown adults, maybe we can discuss some slight priority shifts. but dudes gotta stop thinking that one's own *wants* are more important than some others' *needs*
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 03:27 PM
1

you're describing making content, not dating. not my philosophy on sex & dating. best.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/24 11:55 PM
2

I don't tackle dating as selling. I think it's more authentic and, idk, works for me — and I'm overweight, low income, thin hair, average schlong. So what do i know?
/r/TheRedPill29/02/24 04:47 PM
0

sure but da hell does that have to do with dating? congrats on doing instagram.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/24 02:31 PM
1

Getting good at the platforms is completely negotiable. I'd tell someone that an Instagram with just some posts, even not many and regular, is helpful in the online dating world. Like a portfolio, like a place to put some more pictures than from your tinder. It's nice. Not necessary. Especially if you build the confidence to engage IRL.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/24 07:42 PM
9

Treating a social media account like an extension of a dating profile is very valid — especially if you're not approaching people as much IRL, are busy, etc. I think that's a great point. I don't think you need to become an influencer though. The first half of your post i'm into because it's just another form of self-expression for when your match or the chick you meet at at a bar wants to look you up. And there are some women who view no internet presence as a potential red flag (something they…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/24 02:04 AM
1

okay i often disagree with so much in this sub but that's a pretty sick own.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 01:30 AM
-2

Hm. I suppose what's the need to call this rape then? I'm responding to you only because you, you know, aren't esteeped in the right-wing fear of diversity. What does it change for this Jan man in Belgium? He's not quoted as saying this disrupted family planning. His complaint isn't "I expected to have children with her [that she would carry]!" I'm looking for the substantive harm that would call for jail time He's just...icked out. He's allowed to be icked out, but should that be cause for jail…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 04:29 AM
0

Imagine? That's literally what multiple state governors and legislators are doing to chicks who want an abortion.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 03:19 PM
1

I feel a sense to protect people who are weaker than me, smaller than me. That's not all women and it's not only women.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 04:46 AM
0

oh gosh, does anyone want to tell him....?
/r/MensRights11/12/23 02:43 PM
-8

Sincere question: could it be because these different lifestyles exist in life, and seeing other types of people you may not personally know in real life helps you gain empathy and not want to murder them just cuz?
/r/MensRights11/12/23 02:43 PM
-1

gosh. wait till they find out what else was swapped with white people....
/r/MensRights11/12/23 02:42 PM
1

I'm not sure what you're talking about when you say 'nobody'. People talk about this **a lot** where I'm from. I'm a straight guy who talks about sex for a living and the topic comes up pretty much whenever bi men come up. And it comes up in the media I consume. Are there specific outlets or places you want to see this talked about more? We all have different algorithms and media we consume — so I'd be curious what it is you do consume daily that 'never' talks about it. (I'm not doubting you — I…
/r/MensRights11/12/23 02:37 PM
–

I think, rather, the age limit for drinking (and cigarettes) should be lowered to 18/19 — or raise all the 'adult' stuff to 18 like credit cards, voting, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 07:55 PM
4

Study came out last year about nofap. It just *doesn't help.* There are no scientific benefits to semen retention, and all it ends up doing is causing more mental health harms because of the way that community talks about it. It's not 'bad' to not wanna cum if that's what you choose, but to engage with those nofap communities is dangerous. FFS some in NoFap will tell people to harm their dicks to resist the urge — not good! https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/26318318221116354
/r/MensRights12/11/23 10:51 PM
2

IDK dude. I've had a professional amount of sex and dates being thicc, only 5'10", and never making a ton of money as a full-time comedian. So. I hear you that it may *feel* that way, but it's not the reality. Just keep working on yourself, be the kinda dude you wanna be, and stop trying to 'figure out' dating. Just *be*. Oh. And be empathetic. Not everything needs your left brain. Good luck man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 06:21 PM
4

How? Doomed to....not making 100k? I've never made 100k — I don't feel like I'm losing. Don't look at life as a game to make the most money and you'll quickly stop caring about this. And you don't wanna aim to be like Andrew Tate dude. Guy's a schmuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 02:53 AM
1

Vasectomies not a bad idea for those here who don't want to be in this situation, yeah?
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:40 PM
1

Depends what you mean by 'tricked'. Convinced to? Hole in the condom and you still have that condom? Raped? Threatened to be dumped unless? Depending on the honest answer I think changes sympathies and recourse. What's important now is, if it is your child and it was conceived consensually, is to step up and be a father to that child.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:39 PM
1

It's not creepy to overthink the situation. Ther's also a difference between what you think and what you insist on externalizing, of course. Were you advocating for all gamers to be at least a certain age? Or....? I think that would matter. Your feelings are valid, but maybe the (possibly too aggressive) reactions could reassure you that more people were concerned about your concern than concerned you e-gamed with possibly a female minor. You're also allowed to not play with this girl if — despi…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 01:34 PM
7

i think there's a societal problem encouraging this lack of empathy for each other. dangerous for people to want to opt out guilt free.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 04:12 PM
1

congrats!!!
/r/ExRedPill16/01/23 03:08 AM
1

proving my point 👆
/r/ExRedPill21/10/22 01:37 PM
34

'alphas' would call me a beta after a 10-minute conversation and i'm pretty sure i have more sex than them.
/r/ExRedPill18/10/22 06:23 PM
1

Okay. So it sounds like we can redo this as: men get criticized for speaking the body-based reason they're not interested and when women do it, they are not criticized as often (I've certainly seen it, but I'll agree it's not as common). And that they're not typically being cheered on for this. It's cruel to reject someone and say why unsolicited. Just say no. No need to call people fat on top of not fucking them. Unnecessary whoever you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 04:43 PM
6

'Society' doesn't treat anything any way? I literally never see 'yas queen!' telling off a short guy unless he's got something misogynist in his tinder bio (i've seen the screenshots; wild people put certain things in their profile). I think a lot of this is your perception and select anecdotal evidence you might be rounding up to an overwhelming trend. I'm not sure if you've been rejected over such stark bodily stuff—if you have, I'm hearing it bud—but that doesn't make a trend. Almost everyone…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 04:25 PM
6

Both the man who says that and the woman who says that are assholes. There aren't double standards—if you called out the woman who said this to you publicly, she would be dragged too.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 02:22 PM
0

those were words not numbers. you just hate now, which, w.e but you didn't make a case. and i'm not even making a case. i'm sharing what i've noticed in my lived experience how about: instead of trying to win an argument i'm not involved in, maybe share with me *your* experiences. maybe even how they made you feel
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:36 AM
1

Sorry. I was expecting numbers as a response. Cuz you said, "Does nobody do maths at all?" Disappointed. In you. Had a nice day. Just got home from an orgy. With, you know, feminists.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 06:21 AM
1

Doesn't that work in reverse too?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:40 AM
1

Do I need to ask my next podcast guest the question formerly? Or a mash up video? Honestly, I'll put it together just for you to concede that not EVERY feminist (whatever that means to you) thinks children belong with their mother if a hetero couple splits. No /s.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:08 AM
1

Who hurt you?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:27 AM
1

I'm super open to hearing the math. Do you have some kind of hard figure in mind about the number of self-identified feminists in the country (world?) who don't want gender equality (who oppose mother bias) at the custody hearing? If there is, I'm not familiar and would love more math information.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:27 AM
0

Some of the imprecision in the language here makes it difficult to read. But not everything you say are 'facts'. Someone linked to articles above as if that's a true feminist Bible (there is none). To treat feminism like a monolith doesn't work. There are waves, there are group-exclusionary feminists (TERFs, SWERFs, etc), racist feminists and intersectional feminists. So it doesn't really work to just got 'feminists' cuz you gotta specify who you're talking about, what you're talking about. Not …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:18 AM
1

See feminism doesn't have any central leadership. Like antifa, it's not a political party (like the Nazis). I sense a lot of pain in this subreddit. I see a lot of posts that have such anger, and anger tends to come from pain. I talk to people for a living about sex and dating and gender. And i wish I could have more conversations with MRAs, incels, and dudes who are, well, so angry at the people they also so very much want sex with. Makes me sad. Makes me want to hear who hurt you.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:57 PM
0

That's not what a strawman is. I think you are confused. Strawman is a fallacious argument. I'm not arguing anything. I'm sharing my experience with feminists and none of them having that point of view. I did not say OP is 'wrong'. Weird. No one here wants to fuck women? Doubtful.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:48 PM
-1

That's not what a straw man is. It's my experience. And I am willing to wager I am around more women than you....I'm not here saying you're wrong. I'm saying "this has been my observation." None of this is going to make women wanna fuck you dude.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:36 PM
0

That sounds like quite the exaggeration. Makes it hard for me to engage in a good faith exchange.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:24 PM
-1

To respond to your comment this time ha No feminist I know also says 'moms should auto get custody.' Almost all the feminists I know just want equality—both ways. Then there is a very small fraction of those I know who want to see men feel some pain. Which I do t think is how you get to parity. But they also aren't talking about family court at all. Maybe the feminists y'all are talking about aren't actually feminists or they're on some old wave bullshit. Like I said, the sex+ current wave femin…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:54 PM
1

please circle on the doll where I said "most" anything
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:11 PM
2

my bad. i responded to the wrong commenter.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:10 PM
1

Yes, I didn't say that feminists you describe don't exist. I'm saying the ones I describe also exist. And to the commenter below: I've literally never called myself a feminist.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:57 PM
-3

What are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 04:40 PM
-2

Huh? So you're mad at these alleged feminists in droves who support the above and then when I say none of the ones I know support it you call it weird? That makes no sense dude.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 03:45 PM
-4

Interesting because none of the feminists I know support that.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 02:39 PM
1

but they can't now. and couldn't easily before. this is a valid point *when* abortion access is solid in 50 states. but not before.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 01:23 PM
5

It's not always that easy. Especially if you're working hourly jobs and have a kid. You gotta arrange child care, time off (that they probably won't get), and be able to afford the trip. and some states have unnecessary regulations such as having to have separate appointments X number of days apart. Because they *want* to make it more difficult so they don't get an abortion. I've been there thinking 'oh come on, it's just a couple days.' But for some states, it's not just a travel day. And it's …
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:09 PM
1

First things first tho
/r/MensRights24/06/22 11:35 PM
1

I wish I saw more male vulnerability on this sub like I'm seeing in some of your comment, OP.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 12:54 PM
-1

Gotcha. I just see so much defense of rape jokes, I figured there was a wider sense of humor at play.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 01:35 AM
-5

well, does she actually do it or is she just joking about it?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:50 PM
-1

Just like a story in the reverse, I'll have to see the movie to decide if it's funny.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:49 PM
1

I don't think it was thousands of feet, but like many times my dad dropped me passing me around like a football.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 11:52 AM
-16

the anti-vaxxers get reallllllly weird about their legal arguments
/r/MensRights02/05/22 12:29 PM
-1

Weird. I have a professional level of success with women, I am *not* incredibly attractive, and don't play a numbers game (or any game, tbh). Do you think 100% might be an exaggeration?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 04:53 PM
-7

These posts make me feel like this sub views Women as an enemy. Not sure how that gets ya laid.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:08 PM
1

Hey OP. I'm sensing a lot of pain and frustration. I talk about sex/dating for a living and even help people with their online dating on the side. Would you like a (free, duh) second opinion? Maybe I can take a peek at some message exchanges and help identify what might be going wrong. Dating apps can (and do) work. I'm far from a model—my body type is Orgy Alternate. But they've worked well for me for a decade. Don't let the frustration turn into entitlement and anger. HMU if you wanna chat.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 01:09 PM
0

No animosity from me either. When you mention violence against men, I don't know anyone outside of very specific, very radical sects of feminism (like lesbian separatists) who would tell you that it's okay for women to rape men. The people i know fighting for feminism *also* want that ended. So, for the sexual violence example, fighting rape culture—which disproportional effects women—and promoting consent education for everybody benefits men—like me—who have been raped by and treated poorly in …
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:36 PM
-55

I thought like you too once. Enough evidence and shared experience showed me other ways. And I have a pretty good time.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 02:33 PM
-104

Well, misogyny is committed by one side that actually has more structural power. I do think if misogyny is fucked off, misandry goes with it. Yes, these years I do deal with women who act like shitty dudes when I don't want to have sex on a particular occasion. And no, not one woman I tell those stories to sides with them. Being shitty is just shitty. Let's all stop being shitty instead of pointing fingers saying, "But they're being shitty too!" Let's focus on being our best selves first. When o…
/r/MensRights16/04/22 01:44 PM
2

I think a lot of the men who 'simply' want this don't also 'want' to practice the empathy and patience required to connect with another human being...that can lead to sex. I see among the red pillers a sense of entitlement to sex, that they fixate on their looks so much they forget about a shit personality, that their lack of sex hurts so bad they forget to be kind. Makes me sad. I feel like I was one or two Google searches away from that path back when I was a younger adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 02:10 PM
2

Yup! Saved her time!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 01:12 PM
1

For me, it depends what the belief is. I'm fine with different political beliefs—not different moral ones. So, if we differ on how to do health care, the tax code, how to handle Big Tech. That's fine. I'm not going to 'see both sides' of queer rights or Black dudes getting shot unarmed by cops. Those are not political views.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 01:12 PM
0

Then you're not reading enough because I've seen plenty of men defend Will, too, for a variety of reasons.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 05:53 PM
1

If that's true, why am I a thicc, doughy dude and fuck more than you? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 01:08 PM
1

The majority of the country is overweight. What are you even talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 01:06 PM
1

And we come back to: for your personal taste and some others, and not for others. Until you got a study handy, not a poll, you should personalize these alleged widespread preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 11:15 PM
13

I'm considered overweight, but no one would point at me and think I don't go to the gym or call me *fat*. I've been attracted to, fucked, and dated fat women (as well as others). So it's like, this all just reads you're sad that the only people who wanna fuck you are fat chicks, who you find lesser than you. When the human thing to do would be to be like, "Only fat chicks want to fuck me. I'm not attracted to fat chicks. Well, that's unfortunate," and not make fat people the scapegoat here. Ya k…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 12:33 AM
6

What? That seems like a broad generalization and not reflective of the fat people I know in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 11:47 PM
16

Wait. *You* don't have to date a fat person. But why are you assuming 'average weight people' can't date fat people?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 11:47 PM
1

Yup. And a lot of consent culture advocates do if you ask them! :)
/r/MensRights14/12/21 05:58 PM
0

That's not an answer to my question BUT let's explore that! Where do you think adult content creators should advertise themselves? Are you aware that more anti-heaux legislation (which has serious 1A implications) have bullied platforms to crackdown on even legal consensual sex workers? This causes them to spill over more heavily into personals subs, dating apps, and such. If there was a safe place to post and advertise, they wouldn't need to post or spam as much...it's a reaction to unnecessary…
/r/MensRights11/11/21 08:14 PM
0

Sure. So could not doing what you do in this post? Can you give an example of a criticism of something 'a lot of men do' that isn't a generalization? Like, say, how a lot of dudes send unsolicited dick pix. What's a way to bring that up so that you don't feel 'generalized'?
/r/MensRights11/11/21 01:02 AM
-2

What's a way women could share how some men have hurt them that would feel less toxic and bashing to you?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 01:37 PM
-3

Maybe I see other things, but I think I saw this in say the nursing field. No? I'm starting to see commercials for nursing programs targeting men. Some of my work is in female-dominated fields (slash straight guy-deficient fields)—sex work, sex-positive podcasting. Maybe I can speak to some of this? Part of the reason for the push for more women in certain fields is because there's some boys club exclusions—anecdotal stories until, en masse, it's truly a pattern. In sex work, I can speak to ther…
/r/MensRights04/11/21 03:38 PM
-1

Sounds like my four years at NYU. Daily Mail is such shit. Inherent in the hed is that 'women' don't want casual sex. The issue isn't men having egos or being a Casanova. It's about *how* those assholes are being Casanovas. You can sling dick well around in an ethical, relaxed way.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 01:49 AM
11

Depending on the standards you use, there are no heroes. I hope pointing out racism in feminist movements isn't to dismiss actual racism that sometimes happens in the MRA movement. People of all genders have the capacity to be shitty.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 12:20 AM
1

Interesting. But if most the people at the top of a system share similar characteristics....like, I don't know, whiteness...is it not accurate that Whiteness (in that example) is part of that *system*? Or are the top people mostly White just at the luck of a draw?
/r/MensRights30/10/21 09:15 PM
-2

hmm. how would you then distinguish between a system and individuals? im open to different language. i've just seen how dudes in the dms too much to not think there's a there there (which does not eliminate toxic shit women do)
/r/MensRights30/10/21 04:55 PM
-22

lol tell that to the last president
/r/MensRights30/10/21 03:49 PM
-24

I think it's a huge difference. It's the same difference between talking about Men—the system, the structure, the difficulties of Manhood and Masculinity—and talking about men (each of us, a group of us). To me, it's a System vs. specific people.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 03:44 PM
-27

"in the aggregate". i think you're confusing capital-W White people with me (or you?) being lowercase white
/r/MensRights30/10/21 03:37 PM
3

Okay. And if the goal isn't to have kids...?
/r/MensRights30/10/21 02:36 PM
-1

What? Link? Pretty sure it [at least used to be] the other way around.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 09:13 PM
2

Weird. I'm not party affiliated.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:45 PM
-3

I see them as laws getting to equity, which may feel unfair if you don't benefit from any one policy. But those policies are to get us to a place where we don't need them anymore.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:45 PM
1

but it doesn't agree on how to spell it, apparently
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 12:03 AM
-1

I know a fair number of porn stars IRL. Yes. Sometimes those make-up jobs are so extra you wouldn't recognize them. Also, she's a Hungarian living in Italy. If she was a regular performer, they'd likely say something like how many movies or scenes she's done, specialty if applicable, and would use her porn name too. They didn't possibly because she isn't anyone...she may have done three scenes and they'll say PORN STAR! Compare with other news coverage of a specific performer and you'll notice h…
/r/MensRights09/10/21 03:13 PM
-1

But they didn't use her porn name. So it's moot. Porn stars can look drastically different without all the make-up. They put it in the headline for titillation, not journalism. I hope you can attempt to see how this little thing plays into a larger pattern of anti-porn sentiment. Not that I expect much from the Daily Mail...
/r/MensRights09/10/21 03:10 PM
-9

What does her past porn career have anything to do with this? They don't even talk about it or mention it...just, "LOOK! PORN! MURDER! BE SCARED OF PORN!" lame editorial job
/r/MensRights09/10/21 02:17 PM
-2

Not sure what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 05:16 PM
75

What're you talking about? Have you walked around Brooklyn ever? This is a city of thriving mediocre looking dudes. We're doing quite okay. How about you tell us how you feel about being single? I'm here to listen.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 10:33 PM
3

Are you aware that the incredibly trending and popular No Shave November is....for prostate cancer? I know it doesn't get a month of NFL ribbons, but I think prostate cancer gets plenty of press. It's the first one I think of when I think of Men. I think a lot do too.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 04:22 PM
1

Did she agree to be streamed by the guy? And are there rules on Twitch that you yourself have to be in your own stream?
/r/MensRights25/04/21 11:52 PM
1

You say that like it's a bad thing.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 02:46 AM
0

Pass the ERA! :)
/r/MensRights02/02/21 10:15 PM
1

And I think if you push back respectfully against any of those feminists who say that, the angry ones will shout at ya incessantly. But most will say, "Yes, you're right. We should teach *everyone* about consent culture. Glad to have you on board for less rape."
/r/MensRights22/01/21 02:30 PM
2

Not for nothing...cuz I don't know what you watch...but I saw a ton of people going after Joe. Like....a ton of my timeline. And they were Bernie libs.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 06:49 PM
1

? (I think I get it but....?)
/r/MensRights07/09/20 01:35 PM
2

Eh if the question claims unproven facts or the emotion is clouding what they mean, yeah. Neutral is easier and more productive.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 08:09 PM
1

This is great. I'd change it to 'How should we determine who to believe in a DV case?' So as not to argue over stats not in front of us (gonna check out OC'a link)
/r/MensRights06/09/20 07:54 PM
2

Closer, but you're still claiming a fact in the question. 'Is society inclined to believe false allegations made by women?' is better...but I don't think it's productive cuz like you can't measure that. because anything that is proven a false allegation in police records would absolve blah blah It seems like you think society believes women over men. You can believe that and it not be true (and it could be true). A productive question doesn't assert a fact you can't prove in the question. You as…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 07:17 PM
2

it's a problem to state facts in a question without having the evidence to back up that fact ready at hand. otherwise we just start shouting at each other over who's right about the fact instead of actually tackling what you want. 'why is it problematic to want to believe the man based on individual situations?' might be better? does that feel like what you're getting at? cuz in there, there's no fact to argue over. words like 'most' 'none' 'every' 'all' 'barely' 'less than' 'more than' etc usua…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 07:12 PM
2

I don't think a question worded like that helps because within it, you're claiming 'the court' aka all courts believe 'them' capital-W Women with 'no evidence' as in zero. All the time. So instead of tackling what you want to ask, you now have to argue about whether or not that happens every time (which you'll lose, because of course it doesn't happen every time). I'm trying to find the productive questions to actually ask someone instead of asking loaded questions to get into an argument over f…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 07:06 PM
0

I think we sometimes add 'all' to 'believe women' but thanks. Personally, I think it's a great bumper sticker but not a practical mandate. Sorry again about your dad.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:57 PM
3

You'll find in debate or argumentation that the right tightly-worded question sans fake foundation is much more helpful than the explanation ;) Inflammatory wording of the question but def a question. Thank you. I also have a tough time not overexplaining. Totally get it.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:56 PM
2

Right. I get all of this is making you very frustrated. There's a lot of feeling here. I'm trying to boil this down to a question (or similarly tight and separate questions). Sometimes the emotion behind the frustration and all of the details and different points can muddy up what you're actually trying to say or ask. I'd challenge you to explore if you can get these down to a tight question(s) without explanation. I find that helps me not go off and then when I'm in an argument or debate, I sou…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:45 PM
2

That sounds really tough. Sorry to hear about your dad. Did this experience change your mind on Me Too? Or does this stuff pre-date the movement? Sounds like you (and not only you) want to ask 'Why can't we acknowledge there are false accusations out there as well as credible ones?' Does that sound right?
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:32 PM
1

Would you be able to boil this down into a question? Just wanna know what's at the heart of your beef. Is it 'Why do women lie?' or 'Why should we automatically 'believe women'?' Or...?
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:30 PM
4

Could you word this as a single question you'd ask the #MeToo Gang if there was like a spokesperson for it?
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:11 PM
2

I get scared flying. I know that there's such a smaller chance of us crashing in a plane than me crashing in my car. I know that there hasn't been a transatlantic crash over water in decades—I believe since before I was born. I had to look this up years ago preparing for a flight to London that was freaking me out. I am (likely) not going to die on that flight. That doesn't change the fact that I'm scared (or nervous or uneasy). Should fear inform public policy and laws? No. Those should be made…
/r/MensRights23/08/20 02:30 PM
-58

Wonder what you'd say if a sister or daughter or girlfriend came to you and said they were raped. IDK. Don't think you'd hold them to this standard.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 10:29 PM
-42

What would qualify as substantiation of a claim for you?
/r/MensRights20/07/20 08:59 PM
2

No need to download a special app. If you have iPhone, it comes with an app. Or you can use google play on any android. It's also on Spotify.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 03:49 PM
2

Did you try in a podcast app? Or...turning down your volume?
/r/MensRights06/07/17 03:37 PM
2

That's my point! They CANT just abort it in many parts of the country! If we got to a place where the right would stop attacking their access to a safe abortion, we could revisit this conversation.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 06:19 AM
2

Because he put the baby inside her. They took the risk, they share in the financial burden/"joy" of that child.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 06:03 PM
1

"No rights" is an exaggeration. No say in this nine month period? Correct. And that's because his body won't be destroyed. "But Billy, his life will be destroyed." Well if she doesn't want it but can't access a clinic because of medically unnecessary TRAP laws, her life AND body will be destroyed.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 05:13 PM
0

Yes. That's exactly how it is. Call your congressperson so they can get women better access to abortion and financial opportunities.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 08:48 AM
0

When you enter a woman's vagina, you have to prepare for that outcome otherwise don't take that risk.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 01:28 AM
0

Only one has to carry the baby. If one does 4.5 months and the other does 4.5 months being pregnant, than they should both totally have an equal say.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:58 PM
-1

I just don't think it's his choice for those 9 months. His choices occurred before the pregnancy occurred to have the sex. There's an unequal decision making because we are biologically unequal during pregnancy.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 09:36 PM
1

Never said I was a feminist. Got scolded by Salon.com for not calling myself one, so settle down buddy.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 01:06 AM
1

I did...then i read what experts wrote. I defer to people who've studied that behavior, not some dude on Reddit.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 10:34 PM
1

You didn't ask that specific question worded that way and that question has nothing to do with whether or not Emma lied. Was that night rape? IDK. Neither do you. And no one will ever know because professors and administrators are being put in a position to do mock rape 'trials' where the threshold for guilt is 51%, rather than "beyond a reasonable doubt." As to whether or not her behavior fits in line with some rape victims, the professionals say yes. Some people react to trauma in the ways peo…
/r/MensRights30/07/16 10:13 PM
1

Neither of us are experts. Professionals are. Until you link to something not your opinion, by an expert, we should defer to real sources. I bet you cited Reddit threads on college papers 😆
/r/MensRights30/07/16 07:59 PM
1

And I asked you for your source. Because here's one of many of mine.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 03:33 PM
1

I didn't say "it's normal." You said it wasn't. Rape support groups, staffed by people who've studied this and haven't just read blogs on the Internet, say it's normal. "Many victims continue to have a relationship with their abuser. Though it may be difficult for the public to understand, it is common for survivors of sexual abuse to continue relationships with their abusers after the abuse has stopped. Individuals react to trauma in different ways. For example, it is common for victims to main…
/r/MensRights30/07/16 03:21 PM
1

And you say this because....?
/r/MensRights30/07/16 03:10 PM
1

Why do you say that? There a new study I missed?
/r/MensRights30/07/16 03:16 AM
1

This isn't proof of her lying. This is proof that sexual assault on college campuses shouldn't be handled by college professors with a 51% threshold of guilt required. And that you don't know how rape victims act.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:04 PM
-2

Source: the opinion of some dude on the Internet
/r/MensRights29/07/16 06:48 PM
-3

Actually, that does align with many rape victims' behaviors. Ever meet a mom who gets beat who still says she loves her husband? In that case OP (and mods), i move to have this be marked as a misleading title.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 03:39 PM
-5

Where was it confirmed that she was lying? Last I checked, there was no true confirmation of who was right. Which is why crimes on a campus should be handled by people who handle crimes, not term papers :(
/r/MensRights29/07/16 03:11 PM
-5

He hits her when she's standing up.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:35 PM
3

No. She got a pass because she didn't steal the jokes. Let the comedy community police itself!
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:55 PM
2

By Jenny Kutner. It's a meh hed with a blah lead. It's unfortunate because we had a great 2-hour conversation. I told her, "if you're gonna go negative, go hard." Because at least that gets traffic. Instead, she pussyfooted and the article on a top 1000 site got me next to nothing. An xoJane piece of mine got more listeners than this.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 10:04 PM
2

Check out Slate. I like(d) Salon until a writer interviewed me and ruined a great exposure opportunity to not talk about our interview and instead talk about male privilege. Slate is great and a lot of longer-form pieces. I also like your italicization of media outlet names, as unnecessary as it may be :P
/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:48 PM
2

Slate is a way more rational/reasonable news outlet. When I found it I almost totally stopped reading Salon and other places. Slate takes on political correctness when it makes sense and takes the unpopular-but-correct opinion when that's what makes sense. Emily Yaffe, before leaving for Mic, did great pieces about due process and campus sexual assaults. Love Slate!
/r/MensRights22/12/15 08:11 PM
5

Isn't this article precisely owning up to that?
/r/MensRights22/12/15 07:20 PM
7

I won't say "gender-studies prudes are ruining" everything. But I'm glad there's push back to this. If there are going to be sexual-consent classes, they should be mandatory for all students or optional. To make one gender take them is not the right approach at all. Honestly, all students of all genders should be taught what the university's standard of consent is and what the criminal standard of consent is (although those two things should be the same fucking thing!). But it's not terribly dif…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:05 PM
0

For a group of dudes who are already not taken seriously, it does not behoove anyone to use 'the most extreme example.' There are plenty of comparable and more accurate examples than the Fappening. I'm not taking a side as much as I prefer good arguments. The weak comparison weakens what is a valid argument.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 06:31 PM
2

I don't think using the Fappening as an example is the most accurate, but it's a very valid point. Thanks for the link to the Frisky article.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 05:22 PM
0

Who isn't civil here? You're ridiculous and spouting off fallacies and misdirects, but we're civil.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 02:42 AM
1

Not even the least bit true. They want there to be a distinction when you escalate, say, from oral to vaginal inter course. Or vaginal to anal. But I'm sure you're just ROLLING in the pussy, sir. Enjoy your tactic. Still didn't address misleading title, like a true militant.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 12:55 AM
1

Can we get a misleading title flair? If you click through the link to the source, a student asked if that meant "every 10 minutes?" and it was then explained, "It’s not a timing thing, but whoever initiates things to another level has to ask.” I'm not the biggest fan of making the legal definition of consent put erotic nuance at criminal risk but I also hate inaccuracy. I think this type of constant checking in makes you a better sexual partner, but I don't think it should be illegal to be bad a…
/r/MensRights15/10/15 09:36 PM
0

Ugh I would have shared this if it weren't for "rubing"
/r/MensRights20/08/15 12:05 PM
1

Is this a University poster or government or ____? Universities have different standards (drunk ≠ consent) but it's not illegal to have sex with a drunk person. It's when she's 'incapacitated' that it constitutes rape. Every case is different, of course, but in terms of blanket law. It's blurry on the bottom right but it appears it's says Central Something University?
/r/MensRights12/07/15 12:13 AM
1

This is the interview in question.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:29 PM
1

I don't love her. I just love accuracy and sound arguments.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 10:57 PM
1

Someone sent this before. I asked for a page number so i can actually look. Y'all aren't known for NOT twisting words and embellishment.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:16 PM
1

Someone on this thread didn't answe me when I asked "did you personally read the book?" If you wanna say she was 17, give me some page numbers to look it up in the book where all this controversy started. Otherwise everything you say sounds like you read it on a crazy man blog.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 05:14 PM
1

See you're calling Lena's molestation. Wasn't. She was not a teenager when "looking in her vagina". Can't converse with you if you're operating on faulty info and bullheaded bias. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:48 PM
1

No, what he did IS illegal! Just because you get away with a robbery 50 years ago didn't make the robbery not illegal. It just makes it not prosecutable. It's comments like that that makes MRAs laughed at by the smart people.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:55 PM
1

Correct. So they're not comparable the way this sub is doing, which makes the argument fallacious and means you can't be taken seriously by outsiders. To be taken seriously, have better arguments. I tell the same things to folks on my side of these things, too.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 02:53 PM
2

And one is not nearly as horrendous and ILLEGAL as the other. So that's why they're not comparable.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 07:07 PM
1

Sorry whee is the part where you say she molested her sister when she was 15 the way Josh did?
/r/MensRights23/05/15 09:03 PM
1

I haven't read the book itself. Have you? Is that the only quote and you're interpreting it as sex or did she say she looked in her vagina again then? If you didn't read the book yourself, link? Thanks!
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:30 PM
2

Are you trying to say that we let Lena off light and shamed Duggar? Because there was just a severe age gap here. There's a difference between children essentially playing doctor and a teenager fondling his younger siblings (which at the oldest, one of them had to have been 10). The two cases are just so different, dude. Also, the Duggars have been ones to say that homosexuals and transgender people are sickos and child molesters. Then boop! look who actually molested the child. But hey, maybe i…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 01:44 PM
-6

The chances are? Sounds really scientific. As usual for MRAs, I'm sure you have no numbers to back that up. =tips hat= good day to you, sirs and manlier sirs.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 02:47 AM
-5

Still a false analogy. I said that I'm happy that it was done when I wouldn't remember the pain. If I had learned the two options as an uncut dude, I would have probably still chosen cut...but now I'm going to have to go through the adult circumcision? No thank you! I mean, I also know better than to argue with an MRA. Nothing will be accomplished and to let off your steam you'll end up yelling at the closest woman to you. So, you know. Do whatever you think I guess you have to do on this circum…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 12:22 AM
-5

this is a moronic fallacy.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 11:58 PM
-5

I'm happy i felt this pain back then rather than get an adult circumcision and feel it now. I like my cut lil fella.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 11:33 PM
0

You must be a mind reader being able to tell intentions from a text statement. Can I get your number? You know what, you can insinuate my number from this comment. So just text me.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 06:12 PM
-1

She was not a regular at that time at NYCC. You're a guy who doesn't read.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:24 PM
-2

She said she got $10 in the video. And yes, Al told me she got $10. That is pay. If you were a comic, maybe you'd understand. Yes, because he has to account for that $10. Guest spot money. You can pay a guest spot, sure. Most don't. Sometimes cab fare. Befor/after: doesn't matter. It's a night 15 years ago. Tell me something you did on February 4th this year. Exactly right. Ever listen to Serial? :P Nope. Read her apology. To be clear, I think (THINK, as in speculate but al and i thought it's pr…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:49 PM
-1

She was paid. Al agrees she got paid $10. And no, that's not true. Seeing as only one of us here has Al Martin's cell phone number, let's just take me as the authority on that statement. She signed the pay sheet after getting $10 because that's how Al runs the club. Remember we're dealing with one night 15 years ago. He may have said she could do ten and either she did ten and remembered 15 minutes or the MC may have given her an extra 5 because she was getting things on tv. Or maybe she was kil…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:13 PM
-4

No. She never lied. She never says why she was paid less. To her understanding, she didn't realize it was a guest spot. Al and I both agree she probably just didn't realize it, then interpreted as shitty and held the grudge. Which has now been squashed. The facts and telling of her story are all accurate. She did come there with Todd. She did two same-length sets. She did get paid less. She didn't lie. She misinterpreted. And she apologized. Have you ever had to apologize to millions of people a…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 08:41 PM
-3

Like I said, read and watch. She goes back in and asks, and comics like myself and others who know Al and know how he talks all went, "Yea. $60 spot meant did you want a real spot?" She knew what she was doing but at the same time, and I work part time as a fact checker for magazines, she accurately answered the question. Levo League didn't ask when she faced gender discrimination, just when she was paid less than someone for the same job. Sarah should have known better because she knew she was …
/r/MensRights16/04/15 08:29 PM
-3

Well if you actually watch the video she never says that she was paid less for being a woman. She just tells a story of "a time I was paid less than someone else for the same job." And you know what? She thought that was true. When I and other media outlets reported on Martin's clarification, she publicly came out and apologized. Isn't that what you do when you believe you're wrong? I'm more disappointed with Levo League than Sarah. Sarah came out and did the right thing and even went on to say …
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:06 PM
-5

No one here is saying Mr. Martin is at fault. She came out and apologized. She didn't for a moment battle anyone who said it was a guest spot. Talking to Al one-on-one, we both think she thought it was gendered this whole time and didn't realize it was the guest spot thing. Had she known that back then, she wouldn't have told this story to a gender wage gap video. I'm just saying that the OP is being just as misleading as Levo League. And just like how Levo League and Sarah had the whistle blown…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:58 PM
-10

Well, they were back-to-back and in NYC booked time slots are all paid the same amount (other than MCs and maybe headliners if doing significantly longer sets). However, yes, they were different types of spots. As I talked about privately with Al Martin the owner, it seemed like back then it was a misunderstanding with a young budding comic who didn't understand that. Then it became a long-standing grudge over a misunderstanding, thinking the whole time it was because she was a woman when really…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 04:20 PM
-16

You probably didn't read any of the articles on this, but she apologized for naming Al Martin by name using this story, even though it accurately answered the question "when were you paid less than someone else for the same job?", when she knew that the video was for a gender wage gap campaign. Poor story choice combined with a decade-plus-long misunderstanding that Silverman and Al Martin have now cleared up.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:38 PM
4

I'm ashamed of myself that I Googled "peopleiacs" thinking that was a word. I'm going to go run off in shame haha
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:36 PM
-2

You of course have a choice to not work as much, no? We just won't have as much money to support ourselves if we don't. Unless you land a sugar mama. Or if you're a male escort for women like this guy.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:35 PM
0

You haven't read any of these stories about this, huh? Here's a starter kit for you. Along with her follow-up apology to Al Martin.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:34 PM
0

Can we add a 'misleading title' flair to this? I reported this story myself for Laughspin and this is not true. The story was real (as I confirmed with the club owner who I know personally), but just placed out of context in this video. I think Sarah was misguided using that example, although she answered the question "when were you paid less than someone for the same job?", she knew this was a gender wage gap video. I think Lego League was irresponsible taking a story that had nothing to do wit…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:33 PM
2

Anyone have a source of this quote? Would love to see the context, whether a statement, from a case on her show, etc.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 05:58 AM
1

Link is broken. Couldn't find another real news item on this. Help? (I do not count Fox News as a real news source)
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:01 PM
-4

Is this really a "TIL that if" or just a "TIL that a"? I'm just a fan of semantics
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:18 AM
2

I don't know. Article is written by a man. Really wanna lump all feminists in with what one man said? I don't think he speaks for their movement.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:33 PM
1

I don't post on MR often so do let me know if I mistagged this!
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:23 PM
9

Then he was obviously misinformed because legally you can be intoxicated and consent. You can't be incapacitated. However, under most college campuses rules a student can't consent when under the influence of alcohol, but that's more indicative of colleges' overall fuck-up of how to handle their students having sex on campus, for both genders.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 07:51 PM
0

Y'all love that word. Cute.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 03:15 AM
1

More specified hate rather than hating a large chunk of nameless men :)
/r/MensRights16/12/14 08:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter