TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fuzzy_bunnyx Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by fuzzy_bunnyx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

It's exactly whats implied. World economic forum doesn't even hide the bias and they calculate mens shorter life expectancy as normal. So if men were to live as long as women, they would consider it as discrimination against women.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 03:35 PM
3

This is stupid. If a woman has painful menstrual cramps, call in sick.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 05:16 AM
1

Since a man has no legal influence on whether a woman aborts, he should by default be considered to opt out of parenthood. This makes all the baby trapping and waiting till It's too late meaningless. Once a woman is pregnant, the father would be notified to sign up for parenthood in a certain amount of time. If the would be fathers are late or wait for after birth, they would need to pay extra compensation to the mother of the child.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:05 AM
2

The most idiotic thing about this argument is pretending that the number of women is the most limiting factor in population growth. The biggest growth indicator is food abundance. Most women had 3 or more children in the past, but often had no way to properly feed them, leading to premature death. A lack of food also meant women had to keep working the fields instead of focusing on childcare. So a tribal society with most of the men missing would lack both food abundance and protection. Not only…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:01 AM
2

The other big issue with this logic is that men build and run the society. If a vast majority of men were to die off compared to women, society would simply colapse. The funier argument is that few men would bother to breed with so many women. If there was so much choice, you'd pick a few women your attracted to and compatible with and leave the rest.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:39 AM
3

It's a "popular" insult against men at the moment. Like how women used to insult men by labeling them as "gay". Being homosexual isn't really an insult anymore in western countries, so women jumped on the next unoriginal insult. Looking further, It's like the society is always looking for a vulnerable male minority to attack. At the same time, society will be full of excuses for the unsuccessfull women minorities and blame the men: fat fobic, fuck boys, too poor, too vain,...
/r/MensRights25/08/22 05:17 AM
1

But but but everday is a struggle for women and they're always on the lookout for men just waiting to rape and murder them/s
/r/MensRights17/08/22 02:23 PM
0

There are a lot of batshit crazy responses. If you're flirting with a woman and ask for her number, I consider it a courtesy to give her a ring on the spot, so she can get your number as well. She has every right to be embaresed if she plays games or doesn't have the ovaries to say no.
/r/ExRedPill05/08/22 08:00 AM
1

When you look at it. One of the first things RP acknowledges is that women are in a supperior position in society. It then develops mindests and strategies to wrestle control back to the hands of men. At the end of the day the RP still attempts for men to sell themselves to women, the only exception is for a man to have such high value and status that it does most of the work for him, but thats rare. So all you need to do is to slowly build and maintain feminine value and men will mostly come fo…
/r/ExRedPill31/07/22 03:11 PM
1

Look at the second picture 😅
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/22 02:01 PM
4

Wow, lacking in self awarenes. You just acknowledged that men might be behind on something only to turn around and try to trivialize it with WHAT ABOUT THE WOMEN!? This is typical feminist behaviour and why It's a hate movement.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:05 PM
21

Feminist definition that people like you parrot all the time is based on the premise that women are behind on everything and need to catch up on all the "priviledges" men supposedly enjoy. It's was always blatant cherry picking and white lies.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:26 AM
15

That's probably the reason more and more articles come without the ability to comment. Even they know they are putting out trash.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:00 AM
1

Why would flipping genders change anything?
/r/ExRedPill18/04/22 02:02 PM
1

Ah, feminist spotted! As long as it doesn't hurt women It's irrelevant...so equal. This is why we can't have nice things.
/r/ExRedPill18/04/22 01:17 AM
1

First post was about misandrist "satire" being trendy and something that should not be overlooked. I replied mostly to your second paraghaph. Not only are not all PUA viewers uber misogynists, but by having less views they do less damage as these trendy misandrists with millions of views and retweets.
/r/ExRedPill18/04/22 01:04 AM
0

Nice job contradicting yourself. Misandrist women like these get more views = more reach = more oprtunities to spread their poison. PUAs on the other hand get a fraction of her views = less chance to spread their mindsets.
/r/ExRedPill18/04/22 12:13 AM
1

She has no place being pissed of on behalf of women's supposed wrongs from centuries ago. Just like she has no right taking it out on men who never did the oppresing. Flip the genders and see if this kind of "satire" would fly.
/r/ExRedPill18/04/22 12:08 AM
1

Yes, just because the poison is a bit diluted doesn't make it harmless. In fact this makes it worse because society tolerates this shit and it then becomes the norm or even "funny" like kicking guys in the crotch, ect,..
/r/ExRedPill18/04/22 12:03 AM
4

Dating apps are hardly worth the effort even for average men.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 02:56 PM
8

Femenist statistics like the world economic forum only measures if women are behind on men. If men are behind on anything, It's considered as "equal"
/r/MensRights17/04/22 09:01 AM
0

Actually, incompetent allies are worse than powerfull enemies. A unit must be uniform in Its basic abilities in order to function well. Having weaklings (like women) would only disturb the battle order and place more strain on those that remain. And it gets worse. Israel found out that It's female soldiers on the front line had much lower cassulty rates. Why, you wander? Because protecting women is in mens genes, so they ended up sacrificing themselves so their female colagues could survive.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 10:24 PM
-2

Look, I don't like conscription either or the fact that women get all the benefits without getting to be on the frontline. It's not without its merits, however. The fact that every Boris with an ATM can take out a Russian APC or tank is plenty threatening. It's also for this very reason that infantry is so dangerous to tank brigades without sufficient infantry support which is exactly what happened to Russia. As for women soldiers, there's a lot more to being a soldier than shooting a gun. Physi…
/r/MensRights14/04/22 07:23 PM
-5

Because women are mostly sub par soldiers thanks to biology and there are limited resources.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 11:40 AM
1

We need to give credit to conscription as well. Not only was it the reason men got the right to vote in the first place, but It's also a way for smaller countries to counter bigger opponents. Israel would be long overrun if they were not able to quickly mobilise so many soldiers. There's no freedom when your state is occupied.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 11:39 AM
2

Women have been less apt to organize this way into weird cults but if you've ever heard some angry women blaming men generally for all of their problems, well, it's the same thing. Have you ever heard of the cult of feminism? It comes complete with made up history, delusions to the point of reality distorsion and lack of self awerness that would make Trump blush. It's far from small, easily rivaling religions in size and scope and with far far more media attention.
/r/ExRedPill13/08/21 05:38 PM
-1

Men have oppressed women for millenia? Where did you read that? Feminist history? Class opression is what dominated history. Untill only a few centuries ago most people were not even free and couldn't even leave their land. Yes, a woman was subordinate to her husband, but he in turn had to assume full responsibility for all her needs, debt and actions. If she stole, he would go to jail and if he couldn't control her, he'd become a laughing stock. It takes a special kind of delusional to believe …
/r/ExRedPill13/08/21 04:59 PM
6

The reason is simple. The development of technology is far far faster then any evolutionary changes. The changes over the last century are drastic. In light of these changes, women demanded and succeeded in changing the social contract. They demand to be treated like adults, demand financial and social independence, while at the same time shirking the responsibilities these priviledges come with. At the same time, despite the changes, men are demanded to stay the same. Strong, confident, leader,…
/r/ExRedPill13/08/21 04:49 PM
5

How nice of you to parade around about having no empathy for men. Not only is regular prostitusion way too expensive for most men, what most men look in a woman is geniune sexual desire for him. Men being possessive? Or how about not wanting to get STDs or becoming a father of some other guy's child? You act as if women don't mind her guy banging a dozen other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 10:38 AM
4

That's really ironic considering looks are what women mostly care about themselves. You can virtue signal as much as you want, but we both know women swoon about well built famous and wealthy men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 10:29 AM
2

I think the above statment is so often repeated simply because most men don't ever get to be fuckboys and "explore their sexuality" and "experiment". In a way, a man can't really have proper standards until he explores his options and since men have to be the pursuers, we'd have to have a fuckboy phase to actually learn our sexual value. In this way, a woman would actually have to provide suficient value to the Man for him to sacrifice his other options rather than to be his only or one of the v…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 10:08 AM
1

Passively taking a beating doesn't either. Since feminists lack emphaty for men, making them feel these hurtfull terms themselves might make them realise what they are doing.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 10:24 AM
0

The term toxic masculnity is a typical feminist attempt at poisoning the well. By altering a neutral term masculnity with the addition of toxic and then proceed to constantly spam us with it to the point of it slowly replacing the original masculnity. They could have easily called toxic masculnity internalised misandry, but that wouldn't fit with their narrative of endless female victimhood. We should correct the feminists in the use of proper term and even replace their internalised misogyny wi…
/r/MensRights23/02/21 04:35 PM
0

We can start by not demonising men for all the worlds evils. Stop treating boys as defective girls in school and treating men like rapists in hiding. Teach boys (all genders really) unconditional self love and acceptance. Put far more emphasis on recreation and sport (no one likes fat slobs). As for women: stop gloryfing single motherhood and absolving women from the consequences of their bad decisions. And stop making excuses for womens bad behaviour. And lastly crack down hard on feminists and…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 10:29 PM
9

What did you expect from the world economic forum? They plainly state in their rules for stats that It's only inequality if women are behind in anything. They even went so far as to attribute men's 6% shorter life expectancy to "natural causes" and normalizied the disparity. So if women ever reach the same life expectancy as men, WEF will consider it to be discrimination.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 02:50 PM
2

To say that the fathers abandon the mothers seriously lacks nuance. Men don't have reproductive rights. Unlike women, society consideres a mans consent to sex as consent to parenthood. This is the root of the problem. Nowhere in that statistic is it considered how many men WANTED to be fathers in the first place. Forcing unwiling fathers into child support is a serious cop out from society that wants safety nets without paying for them.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 06:02 AM
2

The OP forgot to mention the most dystopian version of AI reality. When AI can do most jobs better than humans, what do you need your fellow men for? Countries invest in their people because they need them to be as productive as possible, but what happens when that is no longer a winning formula? You end up with the intelligent ruling elite or "sentient" AI and a class of highly educated servants for maintaining their machine empire. We are still ways off the AI overlords and we can already see …
/r/TheRedPill09/12/20 07:30 PM
12

Blablabla. So those 99 women will raise and feed children on their own? Yeah, right. Especially in the past when there was no daddy state. Let's be honest here, considering women as more valuable is merrely leftover primate programming and brainwashing from ruling elites. Not sure if you've noticed, but our"tribes" are not lacking people.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/20 10:17 PM
5

Nope. Making sex a comodity makes you a prostitute. Sex is a means of connecting, communicating and enjoying each other. Sex is only meaningfull when It's given freely and enthusiastically. Redpill doesn't scam anyone. Do you honestly believe that getting your life in order, buffing up and leveling up your social skills is scamming women? Comes of as projection tbh. Remind me, who paints over their face daily and wears wardrobe that makes them more attractive then they actually are? One thing to…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 11:08 PM
5

You obviously don't understand men. What men want on a primal level is to be desired by attractive women. Redpill revolves around this concept. Nothing else a woman brings to the table can replace geniune desire. The logical conclusion of this concept is to have multiple attractive women that can't wait to get their hands on you. It's rather ironic that you hate redpill and yet consider sex as a comodity that women sell.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 09:46 PM
1

Because of the economy. Men pay net taxes and them dying sooner, especially before retirement is a loss for the economy and consequently taxes.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 10:34 PM
4

"Child's best interest" is just a lame exuse a society has to wash its hands of the financial burden.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 07:32 AM
9

Don't be decieved by male mutilation advocates. There's plenty of possible complications in male mutilation too. There's no anastesia when infants get mutilated either. I seriously doubt that genital mutilation in africa is performed by good personel regardless of gender, but in the west that is a consequence of it being oficially outlawed (only right). The most simple long term effect of penis mutilation that is the loss of sensitivity of the glans. When you realise that genital mutilation proc…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 07:18 AM
8

There are degrees of mutilation in both cases and children die on the operating tables. But make no mistake, this isn't the victimhood olympics. It's about upholding basic human rights to bodily integrity and about protecting children. What's absolutely appaling is that these procedures are performed on children or in boys cases on a few days old babies. The procedure on infants is usually performed without anastesia.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 07:08 AM
2

I can't get a vasectomy in my country until I'm 35 or already have multiple kids...
/r/MensRights27/09/20 06:36 AM
15

Relax, It's a MEME about a superhero(one punch man) who became the strongest being by doing the aforementioned training every day for 3 years. But he lost his hair in the process...
/r/TheRedPill23/09/20 12:38 PM
12

Me too 2.0, now with enchanced victimhood for all women. Soon after we'd get women complaining how they can't get a job and men refusing to talk to them in private or even in public. The feminazis would then double down and blame toxic masculinity and "misoginy"
/r/MensRights23/09/20 11:18 AM
32

Don't forget to turn off the AC for extra willpower.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/20 07:10 AM
1

A lot of these arguments ring pretty hollow. Slavery on a large scale is a recipe for societal stagnation. It's simple economics. Less disposable money people have, the less they can spend on products and services and keep the economy going. A society offering its young men little to no social mobility is doomed to decline. Companies and states will still try to squeze people dry, but not because they have to, but because they are greedy. Yes, the whole divorce/alimony is a bs double standard an…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/20 08:20 AM
2

That same misleading "study" that found 1in 4 women as rape victims also found 1 in 5 men as rape victims, but that doesn't suit their narative so It's ignored. This is what you get by stupidly expanding definitions. Just because a drunk woman groped my ass at the club doesn't make me a rape victim ect...
/r/MensRights01/09/20 09:00 AM
1

I think choosing to end/not begin friendship is fair. Being around your crush that turned you down and knowing your feelings won't be reciprocated can be painfull. Especially if you see them flirting or more with some other dude. These situations are a breeding ground for resentment and envy, so It's smart to cut that drama out of your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 05:23 PM
1

It's a nice article, but can we get rid of the whole scarcity myth? Living is far harder than reproduction and the society that looses say half It's men is fucked. The entire economy would shut down and would starve and/or get conquered pretty fast.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/20 02:19 PM
2

The best way would be to stop media distorsion of masculinity. Get young boys some positive rolemodels and build their confidence and competence. Tear down femimism in all its misandric glory and stop punishing men for womans bad decisions. Develop male contraception (vasagel) and implent financial abortion. Punish women equaly under the law. In short, remove distorsions and unfair levrages society gives women over men and maybe things will improve for the next generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 05:42 AM
1

Going by statistics, most rape allegations don't end in conviction. The"statistical" decision would be to doubt the"victim".
/r/MensRights28/06/20 09:42 AM
7

Still, the 70-80% match rate is crazy compared to average guys ~1%.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/20 05:53 PM
1

Did you ever read about the consequences of false rape accussations? Not here to downplay rape in anyway, but lets be honest here, our society treats rape with similar severity as murder or worse (but only if the woman is the victim). I've read rape testemonies and the consequences they leave behind. Some are horrible, yet others are much less so. Same with the accussations, some are trivial, but a lot of them end up with men losing the trust of society. They lose their career, friends and often…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 09:26 PM
2

Do you really? Then when will we teach women "not to rape"?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 09:13 PM
3

What's upsetting is distorting statistics to push your agenda. Take the 1 in 4 women raped as an example. By expanding the definition of rape to the extreme you get that number. But do you know what else do you get? 1 in 5 men raped. Not sure why feminists always gloss over that "fact"🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 09:08 PM
3

Since when was Washington post a trustworthy source? The conviction rate isn't even relevant in this discussion. The whole point is that a mere accusation in the era of me too social media is basically a social murder by witch hunt. It's an attack on reputation that can often never be salvaged. Men lose their education opportunities, Jobs, friends and even family. Not to mention the legal fees and all the stress.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 09:00 PM
1

That's BS imo. Sure if she doesn't take care of herself, but if she does It's easily 15-20 years. That's plenty of time to use it to her advantage to get ahead and lock down a guy of her choice. On the other hand, a guy doesn't magically come in his prime in his thirties. He only does if he works on himself in all facets of life. A fat loser in his thirties is no better off than he was in his twenties...
/r/TheRedPill21/06/20 01:22 PM
2

Nah, It's just that a lot of people have a vested interest in pushing the agenda for their benefit 💰💰
/r/MensRights06/06/20 08:27 PM
8

I'd sue the company as well. At least that way he'd actually get the money.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 08:24 PM
1

Being able to make a lot of money is not just about the money. It means you have the personality traits and skills to make that money. Taking risks, being able to market yourself, marketable skills, money smarts, etc...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/05/20 05:08 AM
2

Yeah, one of the most primal issues of feminism and our society is their denial or willfull ignorance of the empathy gap. The reason men are not opening up is because we were thought by experience that it only makes things worse. You get what you incentivize. If women found sensitive men hot, other men would model their behaviour accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 11:01 AM
2

Women being the more valuable gender is BS imo. They are a bottleneck to the reproduction and there's no shortage of humans around. Men are a bottleneck to everything else. The whole repopulating a tribe with 1 man and 9x women? No, they'd just get conquered or die of starvation...
/r/TheRedPill22/04/20 01:43 PM
10

Note how It's never mentioned that the victims were young men. When there are female victims or girls, It's explicitly stated but when men or even boys are killed It's "People" or "young people"...
/r/TheRedPill22/04/20 01:33 PM
1

Like I said, I'm not wishing harm on them, it's simply that the problem won't be recognized otherwise. It's the same with the races and different peoples. Do you ever hear about tragic news about disasters and terror attacks in Africa and see people put up the flags on FB? Or maybe a minute of silence for the victims? Yeah, didn't think so...
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/20 11:31 AM
2

A lot of people think the verdict went too far. Maybe it did, but do you know what's really sad here? The reverse of this situation happened for decades and still goes on and nothing's been done. The government doesn't care about the problems and injustice men face, they care about women instead. So in order to finally correct this issue enough women will have to take the fall untill it suddenly becomes a societal problem. Men will get their justice only as a side effect.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/20 11:40 PM
11

Sadly, society only cares about women. Only when enough women pull the short stick will it suddenly become a societal problem and be corrected...
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/20 11:31 PM
13

"never settle" for a guy with the same SMV as you.😂
/r/TheRedPill15/08/19 08:15 AM
1

Carbon fibre masculinity was also a "study"...
/r/MensRights06/08/19 03:53 PM
2

Water is wet and the air is breathable. It's not limited by gender either. Ugly people have it far worse in general. The opposite of love is apathy after all. ​ I guess the only difference is in the perception of beauty over time between the genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 08:54 AM
1

Whamen spreading at it's finest.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/19 08:48 AM
28

Why are people shiting on this guy? He's the ideal MRA warrior! Feminists and most women don't operate on logic or empathy anyway so why bother to use it? You guys should have learned the simple truth by now. Society does not care about men's issues. We are considered as disposable ATMs and responsibility sponges to get blamed for everything. So the only way to change anything is to play their own game and use their rules against women. After enough women draw the short straw there will be an ou…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 10:57 AM
1

Uh, that thing is a woman?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/19 02:45 PM
3

No, when people hook up they consent to sex not parenthood. If you can't even make the distinction then don't bother responding. And why should the man "man up"? She made the decision to keep the baby against his will and now he should pay for the consequences? Her decision, your responsibility? That's like giving a girl a ride in your new car and then expect her to pay for the car loan... Don't misunderstand though, this isn't about condoning guys acting irresponsibly, but rather to prevent bab…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 11:23 PM
6

I was just showing you how people switch their opinions when you reverse the genders. Protection is just as much a woman's responsibility. Why did she allow him to stick in that unprotected dick in the first place? But anyway, this is about rights, responsibilities and autonomy. She gets the right to choose what happens to her fetus because it's in her body after all. The man on the other hand consented to sex not parenthood so he should be allowed to choose as well. Autonomy means being free an…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 08:38 PM
2

You could make this even simpler. Men by default would not be considered fathers upon conception because they have yet to accept the responsibility of parenthood. After conception, a woman would report the pregnancy and the man would get notified if he wants to accept parenthood. The decision for both would be reversible to the certain deadline. Furthermore, if the mother chooses to give the baby up for adoption and the father choose parenthood, he would get automatic custody...
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:52 PM
9

You could say the same thing for abortion.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:46 PM
7

You're still missing the point. Men still have to sign up, women don't. So it's not equality. Humor me and find me one example where feminists demanded the responsibility along with a certain right/priviledge.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 06:14 PM
6

Don't be so sure. General voting rights- the jewel of first wave feminism was about giving women the right to vote without signing up for the draft. In fact when they were offered voting rights in exchange for the draft most women refused the offer. But feminists whined and lobbied long enough that "evil white men" granted them the right for free.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 03:32 PM
5

Feminism was never about equality. The name is telling enough. femi-woman. The movment was always about extra rights without the acompanied responsibilities. Voting rights, divorce laws and reproductive rights are only the most glaring examples.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 02:31 PM
1

While OP gives solid advice, we have to keep in mind that these women are not complaining about bottom 80%. They mostly match top 20% guys anyway. So they are basically complaining that guys with too many options to care don't put in much effort.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/18 09:04 AM
1

good point
/r/MensRights16/08/18 10:47 AM
10

Entertainment isn't all bad, but it's hard to deny the alure of escapist fantasy. It can also lead to bad habits like expecting things to be easy/not willing to put in enough effort and not making goals of their own.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 07:46 AM
4

The way I see it, it should be about rights and responsibilities. Since it's a woman's body, we'll never get to force her to carry to term on demand, but that also means she has all the choice and should therefore carry all the responsibility. Until the father is given any choice in the matter he can't be held responsible either. What this would mean is that fathers would have no legal obligations by default. Upon conception the woman would file a "parenting form" asking her partner to become a …
/r/MensRights16/08/18 06:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter