TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gabblox Archive

View 0 posts and 94 comments by gabblox on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

What evidence shows that women in the West are more likely to be violent then men? Sounds like good reading.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 04:03 AM
–

How do you deal with this kind of benevolent sexism? Women and mothers shouldn't be put on some pedestal for their 'innate ability to nurture'. My girlfriend killed a cactus that she bought, so she's literally less nurturing than a desert.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 06:27 PM
–

If it's okay to discuss factors that led to Hillary's failure it should be equally okay to discuss factors that led to Donald's success. No matter which side of the fence you're on Donald Trump's election is certainly historical and it's going to be studied at length for decades to come. My bet is that at least 30 people are going to write their PhD dissertations on this election.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 06:02 PM
–

I feel like it's naive to believe that feminists have all the rights men have and then some. In places that seem favourable like family courts they're subject to benevolent sexism which is something feminism's almost ubiquitously not-okay with. I think it would be pretty awesome if both Men's Rights and Women's Rights could be equally represented by advocates without them trying to sabotage each other or being dismissive of each other.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:35 PM
–

Okay, sweet. We'll all just call ourselves egalitarian from now on. I guess we should just get the mods to delete r/MensRights because gender specific issues don't need to be discussed. /s
/r/MensRights08/01/17 03:29 PM
–

I'm tolerant of different ideas. I'm a feminist who also agrees that there are some very serious MRA issues that need to be urgently addressed. Do you know how contentious that is in both feminist and MRA circles? If I gave equal attention to everyone who took issue with ideas I put forward I would literally never get anything else done.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 03:19 PM
–

The person lying here is you. I said that the MRAs who want feminism abolished don't want females to have rights representation and you've twisted that into "MRAs who oppose feminism hate women". That's quite a leap in my mind. If you want to oppose feminism and support women's rights I feel like there needs to be a cultural or at least colloquial shift because as it stands in contemporary discourse females who campaign for women's rights identify themselves as feminists. Colloquially if you're …
/r/MensRights08/01/17 03:07 PM
–

What 'side' am I trying to convince people of though? The crux of my argument was that the OP was just pot-stirring. The comments somehow devolved into a discussion of feminist monikers which is completely left of field to the discussion. If you made a post on a feminist forum about baby changing stations in men's bathrooms and they started asking you to justify your position on false rape accusations you'd probably be confused and just ignore them as well. My side is simple. The OP was being a …
/r/MensRights08/01/17 02:55 PM
–

The downvote quip was more for the others who are reading this thread since Reddit discussions aren't two dimensional and I'm getting some PMs. I've attempted to substantiate and justify my claims and I have in other comments in this thread. The reason I largely ignored you specifically is because of your strange shift into feminist monikers. Your argument reads like a rant, and I don't tend to justify rants with response. As far as literally goes, I was being literal. There are literally multit…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 02:21 PM
–

Why am I meant to debate someone who can on one hand say that I don't know them so I shouldn't pass judgments on their knowledge, and then on the other say "like robin Urban, of whom you likely never heard"? I didn't at any point discuss feminist monikers which makes up a good chunk of their post, and is far and away beyond the scope of the discussion I initiated. I could go on massive tangential diatribes as well but I don't think the length of a rant is a fair or valid reason for me to debate …
/r/MensRights08/01/17 02:00 PM
–

The vast, vast majority of feminists do not want to kill men, just like the vast, vast majority of MRAs don't want all feminists to die. She outwardly said she was trolling and by circulating her video you're helping her financially gain from this toxic publicity stunt. There's nothing to discuss here beyond this person using anti-feminist outrage as a means of publicity.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 01:23 PM
–

Not sure what your numbers are. From what I can tell it's actually: r/MensRights 132,246 r/Womens_Rights 736 r/Feminism 63,581 You touch on a pretty interesting point though. Feminism is the female equivalent of Men's Rights, because "Women's Rights" isn't really a term. The radicals in the MRA community who want "feminism" abolished effectively don't want females to have rights representation which is part of why onlookers are able to confuse MRAs with the broader craziness of the manosphere.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 12:53 PM
–

Your disagreements are so multifaceted and unclear that it's impossible for me to debate you. I'd literally need to write a book to adequately answer half your questions. Just downvote the nasty feminist and go about your business.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 12:43 PM
–

I've never seen a reddit user arrogant enough to add "Feel free to post this on R/bestof." Congrats.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 12:25 PM
–

http://imgur.com/gallery/cPzlB This is impossible to 'prove', but one of the most prominent examples I can think of is the massive cultural shift that occurred when r/TwoXChromosomes became a default subreddit. Every thread had top comments that were "As a male~" and in retaliation many users from r/TrollXChromosomes started posting things they believed males "wouldn't want to see" like extensive discussion of uterine chunks, which were subsequently downvoted. There's still a widespread belief o…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 12:14 PM
–

Political analysts make their living off of understanding how and why election results swung the way they did. I think it's perfectly reasonable that Donald's victory would be studied considering that Hillary won the popular vote.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 11:43 AM
–

As an FYI you don't need to be anti-woman to be an MRA.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 11:33 AM
–

I'm not saying it's okay to ban people based on their gender, but it's generally not kosher for a majority to enter a minority's space and start loudly telling them why they're wrong about their beliefs. For example Japanese subreddits have problems with 'weeaboos' trying to tell actual Japanese people that their experiences are wrong and that "Japan isn't really like that". I never said feminism is anything like a religion, so we don't agree there. It's ideological which is probably the only si…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 11:23 AM
–

Well she's up for a 38 year sentence, so I do think she's being held accountable. The person giving her more and more drinks when she was barely unable to stand has some level of accountability for that outcome. I'm not convinced there's a gender issue here.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 10:07 AM
–

Reddit is an overwhelmingly male community and all of the female oriented subreddits have a massive issue of male opinions overshadowing female-geared content through sheer multitude. You really weren't trying to add anything to the 'discussion', either. You entered their space with a presumption that they are inherently wrong and tried to throw that in their faces. No one's impressed by the atheist that goes into Christian message boards to post anti-Christian quotes. You went in looking for a …
/r/MensRights08/01/17 09:53 AM
–

Feminists like myself do try to reject these people, but every time we do we get told we're using the "no true scotsman" logical fallacy by the manosphere. to the point that feminists books with these opinions are part of the curriculum of some classes at women study courses. I read "Mein Kampf" in history class back in the day and I read parts of the bible when I decided I was atheist not catholic. How can you reject philosophy without reading about what it is that you're rejecting? I teach a u…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:49 AM
–

This film has been blocked globally by feminists It's hard to be correctly informed when most of what I read about it is full of hyperbole. The film isn't 'blocked globally'. A few cinemas in a few countries backed out of showing the film.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 01:58 AM
–

Well they were blocking other people from seeing the film and they were also boycotting the film. It doesn't make sense to see a film you don't want others to see. It's terribly motivated but that's consistent on their end. As far as free speech goes I really don't know. It seems to be a largely North America-centric problem though I know some feminists in Australia protested the film as well. All the feminists I know personally are happy to debate with me and others, yet forums like r/feminism …
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:35 AM
–

Do you have any evidence? Nope. Hence "I think" rather than a statement of fact. Do you think part of this might be due to the way feminists instinctively dismiss all examples of problematic feminism by saying "feminism is a big tent?" In my experience it's mostly radicals who want the tent to include them. More level-headed feminists tend to want to close the fringe out. There is much a "womanosphere" as a "manosphere." 260 results for the term womanosphere versus 266000 for manosphere. I reall…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:23 AM
–

That might be true for now, but the Men's Rights movement is still tiny and relatively grass roots. Once you see any level of institutionalized power the crazies from the 'manosphere' will reach in trying to wield "Men's Rights". I can see it now: Incels calling the "Men's Rights" card when they're saying that men should have access to subsidized prostitution.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 11:29 PM
–

I don't want to defend what they were doing, but from their perspective they were boycotting the film and giving the film money by viewing it would be counter-productive to their efforts. I don't agree with people who are anti-abortion but I genuinely feel bad for them that they think a fully-fledged human life is being extinguished every time an abortion takes place. Unfortunately a lot of people get so worked up that they don't realise they're being irrational.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:48 PM
–

Saudi women obviously have fewer rights than women in my home country of Australia, but focusing on places like Saudi Arabia is not useful. They are not willing or able to receive help from the West. Unless that change comes from within they're not going to be helped. It's very contentious to say this here, but a lot of feminists are trying to actively help men's rights via female rights. You may want to mentally replace 'patriarchy' with 'culture' but this is a quick summary I found.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:37 PM
–

I see no trouble with calling myself a feminist. Every moderate who says they're a feminist helps to reclaim it from the people like the ones this article is about. And honestly, the etymology argument is fundamentally flawed. That's like saying paediatricians are anti-adults. Feminism isn't anti-male, it's that it's focus is on fighting for women's rights. There are a lot of really intense modern issues facing women like forced sexual slavery, and I am more focused on dealing with those issues …
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:26 PM
–

For what it's worth, all movements are driven by radicals. It takes an extreme amount of commitment and dedication to lead a social movement, and often the leaders of movements want to push much further than their followers. For example the average vegetarian/vegan isn't nearly as batshit crazy as Ingrid Newkirk, co-founder of PETA who has a public. From this article: She asked that her flesh be cooked in a human barbecue, her skin made into leather products, her feet made into umbrella stands, …
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:06 PM
–

FWIW I think the feminists who protested The Red Pill movie because they were ignorant and misinformed. r/theredpill is a larger sub by volume of subscribers than r/mensrights. I get that the idea of taking the red pill originated from The Matrix, but within the 'manosphere' 'The Red Pill' is synonymous with degrading pick-up-artistry that has a very substantial rape-culture. A lot of feminists haven't immersed themselves in Men's Rights, so they don't see the difference between incels/the red p…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 09:52 PM
–

As a feminist I want to offer a sincere apology. This isn't right. I don't know when or how it happened but radical feminists have taken control of the feminist movement and are steering it far off the course that the overwhelming majority of moderates agree with. I know it may feel hard to believe, but feminism truly isn't out to get men. Women need representation for their rights just like men do, and that's what feminism is supposed to be. There are many rational/reasonable feminists like mys…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 12:19 PM
1

I don't know where I lost you. I was never trying to compare the incel movement to the feminist movement in scope. But then you disagree that incels can be MRAs so I guess you think this club has some magical barrier of exclusivity that feminism doesn't have. If an incel can say they're an MRA, advocate for rights for men (however absurd), and still not be considered an MRA in your eyes then I don't know what to say.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 11:45 PM
–

There isn't one. People are naively applying their shitty-at-best understanding of the US legal system and applying it to Australian law. For some reason a lot of r/MensRights content focuses on pulling down women/feminists rather than focusing on ways to lift up men. As a thought exercise go read the frontpage and count the number of articles talking about making actual efforts to better the situation. There must be a better way to solve issues like male circumcision, male suicide rates and mal…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 06:44 AM
3

I don't think this has anything to do with feminism at DM. This is just journalism practice. Write the headline that gets the biggest reaction.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 02:46 AM
0

I think the person who posted this was being a dick, but I really appreciate that you've kept it up and allowed the discussion that was taking place. I like your moderation style.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:22 AM
1

Lots of feminists are very actively interested in men's rights. The issue is that r/feminism is not representative of modern feminism. What it is representative of is why the owner of large ideological subreddits shouldn't just be some random person who registered the name first. Both genders face unique problems and both genders need people advocating on their behalf. There are feminists out there who're just trying their best to deal with issues facing women. Hating open discourse isn't a requ…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:11 AM
1

Yeah, when you reverse a paraphrased quote that's absurd it still sounds absurd. The actual quote equivalent would be: "But women has[have] it bad too!" which is the type of post I wouldn't expect to see welcomed in a men's rights forum.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:00 AM
1

It's not hypocritical. A suffers from X. B also suffers from X. X is still an experience that A faces. A has a place for discussing issues facing A. A's discussion forum has a rule to avoid discussing issues related to B. You may think it's a little disingenuous because it may imply that the situation is unique to women, but that's not hypocritical or logically inconsistent. With that said I'm a feminist and r/feminism is not a good community. The moderators have a death grip on the sub and acti…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 05:50 AM
1

The mods there are zealous in their defense of their space. They ban feminists like myself who are also interested in men's rights. Don't let r/feminism and the crazies you hear about be your impression of feminism - they're an oddity not the norm.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 05:39 AM
1

Neat, so it only applies to roughly 3 billion people. What happened to you people.
/r/MGTOW19/12/16 03:41 AM
–

I know a lot of what Erin Pizzey has to say. A good chunk of her dislike towards feminists are militant feminists who have become so radicalised in their views that their reaction to all feedback is hostility. Given your tone and attitude toward me saying that it would be constructive to work with feminists towards mutually beneficial means I have a feeling you may be the MRM equivalent of a militant feminist.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:45 PM
–

I didn't say that you want women to be oppressed, in fact I had an assumption of the opposite. I was using rhetoric to highlight the absurdity of your position that feminists want men to be oppressed. They don't want men to be oppressed the exact same way that you don't want women to be oppressed. There are aspects of the system that aren't fair for men, there are aspects of the system that aren't fair for women. We should be trying to help each other out instead of demonising each other.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:18 PM
–

You have a very polarised view of the world. It sounds very "us versus them". Do you want women to be oppressed? If not you should consider that there may be feminists who don't want men to be oppressed either.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 02:28 PM
–

No, there's no evidence? No, feminists shouldn't be working with MRM?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 12:38 PM
–

Is there any evidence that Tammy Hughes is a feminist, or is that just a gendered assumption based on her name? Feminism's ideology of toxic masculinity doesn't seem especially at odds with this post. This is probably an area where feminism and the MRM should be meeting as middle ground.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:04 AM
–

It makes you seem radical when you say things like "where one woman". I imagine you believe that not all men are the same, and different things do and don't appeal to different men. Perhaps you should not speak in absolutes about a gender that encompasses several billion people.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 06:53 AM
–

I wonder if the female horse might also have some baggage.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:36 AM
1

Sorry if I implied misogyny or violence, I wasn't trying to. I just don't like hanging out with groups of people who share different ideologies than myself while watching (what I assume) will be somewhat ideologically confronting. I'm not afraid of ghosts, I'm afraid of awkward social encounters.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 04:17 AM
1

Had no idea r/FeMRADebates existed. I'll definitely check that out later today, cheers.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 03:40 AM
–

There's most likely truth in that since there's a higher benchmark to calling yourself an advocate versus adherence to a broad ideology. Just think carefully about where you source your information and try to avoid demonising the other. Modern feminism is a lot more moderate than you would expect if your average day to day reading talks about feminists as being misguided idiots protesting a film.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:41 PM
–

Weird. I heard that it was the opposite. Someone said they weren't a feminist and then got applauded. I wonder if I can find the source
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:27 PM
–

I don't really believe in gendered safe spaces either, but I wouldn't protest war at a veteran's funeral, and don't think it's appropriate to be a voice of dissent at an MRA celebration especially when there are some feminists who're actively protesting the movie (I don't understand why they are, and don't agree with their decision to do so). For what it's worth in my experience as a male feminist MRAs seem a lot more open to dialogue than feminists (e.g. r/feminism censors a lot of 'dissent'), …
/r/MensRights06/12/16 12:23 PM
–

The harsh antifeminist rhetoric in the MRA community doesn't inspire me to go out of my way to attend a largely MRA gathering. If that makes me a 'pansy' then so be it. I'll wait for the wide release.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 11:54 AM
1

Most protesters who cover their face aren't doing it out of a sense of embarrassment, they're doing it out of fear of potential backlash. Male protesters at a local feminist luncheon recently (and embarrassingly) wore Guy Fawkes masks.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:25 AM
–

For what it's worth I'm a dude that identifies as feminist and I'm planning to watch this film when I get the opportunity to. As far as I know it's not out on DVD yet and the limited screenings are definitely a men's rights space. I feel it would be antagonistic for feminists to go to the local premiere of such a film. This is certainly an assumption but my guess is that most people on this subreddit would feel out of place attending a public screening of a feminist film. Also for what it's wort…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:10 AM
–

Is there a problem with "Teach People Not to Rape?"
/r/MensRights06/12/16 07:46 AM
2

The article has literally nothing to do with feminism, makes no mention of feminism. Gendered stereotypes existed long before feminism, so instead of attributing the issue to feminism is there something that can actually be done to support the men who lost their jobs and to get the transit authority to change their minds?
/r/MensRights26/11/16 02:13 PM
1

Everyone here is being pretty damning, but we have no idea what the "evidence" actually is. I wouldn't put it beyond the realm of possibility that the Emirates "found some evidence" that got everyone involved their passports back.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 06:59 AM
–

Australian so pardon my ignorance, but how do they know the demographic breakdown of voters? I tried following the sources through but all I saw was fudged together infographics. Aren't votes protected by anonymity?
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:26 AM
1

There's a good way and a bad way to argue, and I feel that ad hominems are a bad way to argue if you want your points taken seriously. The constant "feminists are evil" rhetoric here is so overwhelming that it displaces most threads directly related to mens' rights.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:13 AM
–

I'd really love it if the Mens Rights movement had less hateful rhetoric about feminists, too.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 04:05 PM
–

I'm a dude who identifies as a feminist. I might be able to shed some light. One thing to consider is that the feminism subreddit is a heavily moderated community. I was banned there and still can't figure out why. Censoring users is a great way to ensure that a subreddit reflects the moderation team's ideology rather than being an accurate version of that ideology. There are a lot of moderate feminists who believe in things like domestic violence shelters for both men and women, that men can be…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 10:53 AM
–

Why do you still call yourself a feminist? I'm not sure if this is a genuine question or not, and answering it here will most certainly be contentious. Still, on the off chance that you're genuinely interested: I think it's crazy to believe that one gender can have issues (like male homelessness) and to not believe that the other gender also has issues (like luxury goods taxation for tampons when condoms are not taxed). I think that men and women are negatively impacted by the idea that being ef…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 05:33 PM
5

I'd argue that not screening something isn't equivalent to banning it, but if I conceded that not screening something is the same as banning it, the logic still isn't consistent. My tenancy agreement which is more legally binding than not screening a movie has a rule that high-heeled shoes can't be worn on the hardwood floors. That doesn't mean that high-heeled shoes are banned in Australia, and it's false to say that shoes are banned in Australia without additional and very specific context. Au…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 02:47 PM
–

By the same logic the cinema that's refusing to show the film can do whatever it wants and this thread is perpetuating a non-issue.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 02:37 PM
–

No I came here because I'm an Australian that's interested in Australian media law. I was also genuinely curious when I saw r/MensRights advocating for something that sounded like it was advocating for r/TheRedPill. I was misinformed, sought information, learned information and have formed new opinions based on that information. I do think that r/MensRights is an echo chamber though. I think that's also true for r/feminism too. Every ideologically driven forum is. Republican boards are full of R…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 02:14 PM
–

Sorry that I told you not to lie. I feel like my input is relevant here for exactly the reasons that you list. I'm Australian, a feminist and a male that cares about men's rights like equal representation in family courts and men's suicide rates. The filmmaker identified as a feminist at the start of filming and their preconceptions presumably transformed as the film progressed. While there's probably benefit in existing MRAs watching the film, it sounds like the film's goal is to provoke transf…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 02:00 PM
–

Sounds like they should have changed the name while in production. I mean, r/theredpill has almost 50% more subscribers than r/mensrights. It's not culturally insignificant and it's easy to see how feminists may have made false assumptions about the ideological position of the movie given its culturally pervasive namesake.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 01:44 PM
–

Sounds fairly disingenuous to me. Lying because another group lied doesn't sound like a good way to gain moral high-ground in any case. I feel like implying that the film is banned in Australia also makes it less accessible to Australians who might otherwise be interested in watching it when it has a box release. Assuming the goal is spreading the ideology of the film and not just making profits for the film, gimmicky marketing should probably take a back seat.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 01:33 PM
–

Seems like it's badly named. Last I checked The Red Pill was a group focused on sexual strategy, not Men's Rights. Maybe I'm misinformed, but it seems to me that the decision to latch onto a controversial namesake is what got the screening cancelled.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 01:13 PM
–

But it's not banned in Australia. As far as I can tell it hasn't been refused classification, so there's no reason to believe that distribution of the film is anything other than legal. NOT SCREENED IN AUSTRALIA is probably the most accurate slogan it could use. If the film isn't awful it should probably be getting screened by at least a dozen independent cinemas across the country. The benchmark isn't very high for many of these venues.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 12:57 PM
–

I'm confused - what Men's Rights are being infringed upon here? A private institution with no legal or moral obligation decided not to screen an ideological film about the Red Pill. That doesn't seem like an attack on any rights that I know of. Heck, TRP doesn't even relate to Men's Rights, so why should r/MensRights care?
/r/MensRights25/10/16 12:44 PM
-3

The title here seems more than a little misleading. It seems like the group is trying to support the rights of Muslim refugees. They in no way endorse the rape or are siding with the rapists. They're protesting against Islamophobia. Some might consider it bad taste to protest while something so heinous is on peoples minds, but the stand of support for the Muslim refugees who aren't rapists seems pertinent in tough times.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 11:52 AM
–

The reason I mentioned Red Pillers is because they are not representative of Men's Rights yet some claim to be. Just because there are people out there who identify as feminists doesn't mean that they represent the ideology accurately, just like Jihadists don't accurately represent Islam. Think about why people are saying the things that they're saying and you might stop having retarded world views. Just a suggestion. Demonise feminists all you want, but some of them aren't that crazy. They're j…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 06:32 AM
–

Can you enlighten me on what feminism is "really about"? Lemme just have a quick poke over at r/feminism to read up. Welcome to the feminism community! This is a space for discussing and promoting awareness of issues related to equality for women. Shit that sounds alarmingly similar to something else I've read recently. The Men's Rights subreddit is a place for those who wish to discuss men's rights and the ways said rights are infringed upon. It's almost like feminism is for discussing gender r…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:35 AM
–

Oh look, an MRA who thinks that all feminists are horrible terrible people with completely soul corrupted ideology. I guess I should just consider the average Red Piller to be representative of MRA and follow your logic. Clearly all genders are completely equal and none are faced with gender specific issues. I swear to god if you guys put half the effort you put towards bitching about feminism into solving mens rights issues, you'd have lower suicide rates for men, more just resolutions in famil…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:24 AM
–

The feminist students are not being forced to attend this function. If they do not agree with the content, they don't have to attend. Firstly, this assumes that there is zero cross-over between the FemSoc and the Journalism students. Secondly, the feminists in this instance are arguing for something that MRAs should also be on board with anyway - they're trying to protect the rights of trans men. Your whole argument just falls back to the idea that this person is being censored, and my argument …
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:55 AM
–

A university group should protect its students from unwarranted ideological challenges Nah, universities should take the rights of their students into account first and foremost. People shouldn't be forced to deal with unwarranted ideological arguments when they're working/studying. For a rights defending subreddit you dudes don't seem to care about rights very much.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:37 AM
–

This happens every single time. Feminists are asked to defend their position with objective facts and they crumble. You cannot argue in favor of a subjective issue like feminism/mens rights with objective facts because they are non-objective issues. It doesn't matter if you tell me that 99% of garbage men are males, just like it doesn't matter if I tell you that 99% of CEOS are males. Objectivity is backseat to our morality which determines the appropriateness of these social constructs. Also I …
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:24 AM
–

This is as much a Mens-Rights issue as it is a feminist issue. Or have men abandoned trans people as 'feminist others'? Further, the policy actually makes a lot of sense from the perspective of the university. A university group should protect its students from unwarranted ideological challenges, and shouldn't provide platforms that effectively endorse the ideologies of people who demean their students. If someone was wanting to talk about how black people are evolutionary inferior at your unive…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 04:34 AM
-7

/r/MensRights seems to talk about 90% "feminists are bad", 9% "double standard for women" (which is at least approaching the right field of discussion) and <1% actually trying to do something to better the situation for mens rights.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 11:51 PM
-5

Can someone please tell me how this relates to men's rights or the ways in which mens rights are infringed upon?
/r/MensRights23/10/15 07:51 AM
–

I had a long winded post explaining why you're a retard, but since you haven't bothered spending two seconds to critically assess your point of view, I'll just insult you instead.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 05:14 AM
–

I don't think you understand what citation is.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 12:25 AM
–

People colloquially refer to having "high self esteem" and "low self esteem" all the time. This implies that self-esteem is on a continuum. If a continuum exists, quantitative data exists. If quantitative data relating to a construct exists, the construct can be measured. Self-report inventories are generally validated using a mixed methods approach that assesses quantitative and qualitative data. You're being very quick to dismiss science. The next time you find yourself asking "How can creatio…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:36 PM
–

This peer reviewed, statistically reliable measure is totally junk. I am sure you're much more in tune with scientific methodology than the dudes who have a paper cited thousands of times by thousands of academics across the world.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:12 PM
2

Depending on your subjective feelings, a scale about your subjective feelings might yield differing results?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:09 PM
–

You probably know better than the scientific community, but where I am from self-report inventories are highly valid methodologically as they yield quantitative data that can be analysed in a way that allows the researcher to explore statistical significance.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:03 PM
–

So what? So that is a problem. Problems can be examined in isolation. But, it doesn't really do any actual harm. It's just a video game. Oh. You apparently know much better than an entire field of empirical research that is looking at the psychological effects of videogames. But you can deduce that the person claiming the unrealistic standards harm women does not believe the same for the way men are depicted. No, you cannot deduce that. This literally defies logic. Again, statements can be made …
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:40 PM
–

Holy shit, you guys are petty. "The representations of the female body in video games and movies are unrealistic and unattainable" is a provably true statement. Obviously there are outliers, but a large number of games depict females in a hypersexualised manner. Based purely on that deduction, you cannot reason that anyone is saying that the masculine equivalents are unrealistic/realistic. Use some fucking logic. I mean, this shit isn't even anti-feminist at this point - it's just anti-woman. I …
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:30 AM
8

I am an Australian male. You can't be talking about American sources the whole way through a document, then randomly tack on "See, look at this proof. Australia!". That's not how to create a persuasive argument. Also please note irony "hyperbole from the screeching feminist minority."
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:47 AM
3

Yes, and many of them are lacking in validity. 25 year old sources (way too old to be relevant), a random Australian source (why not Saudi Arabian source while we're at it?), Wikipedia, and more~. That's of course ignoring the absence of sources for bold claims like "... a man's life is often considered less valuable than a woman's."
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:18 AM
7

Yeah, who needs valid sources and accurate presentation of data? Lets all just be persuaded because a random Redditor took the time to render text in MS Paint. Great job OP! You convinced people in /r/MensRights that men have issues. Take your karma!
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:05 AM
22

Terrible graphic. It doesn't even make sense that it's a graphic. It just means that there's a bunch of URLs you can't click. This should be a webpage. "...significantly fewer college degrees..." When you use are referring to significance in the same sentence as a percent, I expect to see a statistic. "...longer than women accused of the same crime..." 'Same crime' is just plain wrong. At best you could get away with 'similar offenses'. "...twice as likely as women to be homeless" This lacks imp…
/r/MensRights17/01/14 03:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter