| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | if a man posted this it would be literal incel content but okThis strikes me as a joke at face reading. Are we sure it's meant seriously? Edit: just checked the account and it's definitely satire. | /r/PussyPass | 19/08/20 10:34 AM |
| 1 | See the disconnect happen before your eyes. Different standards...Roughly equal? Positions? Are you sure you're up on the biology involved here? Men control where and when the ejaculate is released (in a consensual interaction). End of story. Can it be hard to control? Sure. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/20 10:19 PM |
| -1 | See the disconnect happen before your eyes. Different standards...You're right. I should have specified "consensual" interaction. In the initial post, there was no implication that the man had not wanted the interaction. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/20 02:11 PM |
| -4 | See the disconnect happen before your eyes. Different standards...I get where they are coming from because in any sexual interaction, the man has 100% control about whether that interaction could potentially lead to a pregnancy. When you strip everything away, if he absolutely does not want a baby, he can control that. The woman has some control, but not as much. That post connected with me as I have a nephew who is shirking his responsibilities too. He was "trapped" by a pretty trashy girl, but that doesn't excuse his behavior. This issue has split my family … | /r/MensRights | 26/06/20 02:02 PM |
| 2 | Just curious!So many holes in that argument, foremost of which is a) what draft? That's why it's moronic. Second is that wartime is about the most essential allocation of resources. Do you think that WW2 would have been won if women were fighting on the front line and men were riveting airplanes back in the factories? Warfare has changed so dramatically since the 1970s that is impossible to conceive of any situation whereby mandatory conscript on will be reinstituted. Find me a serious strategist who doesn't… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 02/01/20 10:15 AM |
| 1 | Just curious!I'm not disagreeing with the theory, just his execution of what he obviously thinks is a damning burn to the other side. I get what he is trying to say, but use this line in any debate and you will be blown away instantly. That's what I mean about it 'seeming' smart, but there's nothing beyond the funny turn of phrase. There ARE good arguments for what he's trying to get across, but he didn't do it here. And I was being genuine when I said "he may well be a badass". This is my first time every h… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 02/01/20 07:43 AM |
| -2 | Just curious!He might well be a badass, but this particular post strikes me as something that seems smart until you think about it for more than two seconds. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 02/01/20 05:35 AM |
| 1 | Simps and cucks probably don't agree with thisYou don't need a law if you protect yourself | /r/MGTOW | 21/12/19 09:10 AM |
| 0 | Simps and cucks probably don't agree with thisUnless it's taken from you against your will, only you are responsible for what happens with your semen. A man gets to decide where he 'distributes' his seed. If you don't want to be on the line for child support, then don't even take a chance that you might create a life. It's totally irrelevant if the woman is on the pill or lying about being on the pill. You have no one but yourself to blame if you're indiscriminate about where you plant your seed | /r/MGTOW | 21/12/19 09:09 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter