TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gaelgeagom Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by gaelgeagom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Why did they take the mugshot of the dude?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/19 10:29 PM
-2

Please note how by the end of this he is saying that Lovelace doesn’t belong because it’s not pure math. Story changing pussy.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:43 AM
0

Again, nowhere does the book claim to be about pure math.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:30 AM
1

Maria Gaetana Agnesi. I said the first calculus textbook. Not Newton’s theory on calculus.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:28 AM
0

So someone suggested that woman be included in a book in roughly 100 words and you ripped apart how this cannot be made to happen in a 500 word essay. You come off as a scared little man, man up.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:26 AM
1

I guess you edited out the blunder. How are you still ignoring computer processes? Newton observed things and explained them. Lovelace made things reality with her calculations. Also, the first calculus text book was written by a woman.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:25 AM
1

I’m not an author, and neither are you, and neither is the person who wrote this review. Leave it up to the people qualified to make these decisions instead of being an armchair history editor.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:20 AM
0

You’re contradicting yourself lil man.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:19 AM
1

Nothing I’ve read about the book says it is about pure math. Please tell me why computer math is less important to math in general.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:18 AM
1

You said before Lovelace didn’t deserve to be next to Newton.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:13 AM
0

What gives you the right to decide what parts of math are more important, in a book someone else wrote. Write your own incoherent fucking book about men in math if you’re that upset. People are allowed to write reviews of things on the Internet. Now stop watering down the cause of men’s rights with this shit.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:13 AM
1

It’s hard to understand a point that keeps changing.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:10 AM
1

As a physicist, not a pure mathematician. Since you’ve changed the premise of the book in your mind to be about pure math does Einstein make the cut to be in the book as a physicist?
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:08 AM
1

I never argued that and physiology men and woman are different, I don’t get who you’re pushing that post on. The book is about mathematicians in general, nowhere in the synopsis does it say that it is about pure math. But most importantly, you admitted she made great contributions.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:07 AM
0

You’re but hurt because someone wants a woman to be included in futur books, my bad, I forgot just how little you are.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:04 AM
1

Pure math and applied math aren’t the same. Does Einstein make the book?
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:03 AM
1

Woman have been implicated in literature because it’s something easy to teach and learn. If you can read and write you can be an author. Ada is responsible for what we can do with computers, she is responsible for this conversation. Feminism didn’t rise in 100ad because the world was still run by violence instead of intellect. Woman are physically different than men. Woman don’t claim to be smarter than men, but they are intellectually equal, that is why they haven’t solved the Riemann equations…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:00 AM
0

I guess what I’m really getting at dude is shit like this waters down the cause of men’s rights. I joined this sub last summer when I found out my female coworkers made the same pay and were expected to do less. Particularly dangerous stuff, they were not expected to do at all. That is an actual issue of inequality. You are butt hurt about a book that includes woman. There are bigger fish to fry.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:57 AM
1

That is fine if a man or a group of men do a great thing but if a woman helps or in this case is an integral part (of computer science) how can you excuse a book that completely overlooks them? If there is a woman on a championship soccer team, would you advocate a book about the team that doesn’t mention her?
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:54 AM
0

You have ceased to make sense. Did I break you?
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:46 AM
-1

Well, you started this by running Ada Lovelace into the ground, she is a fantastically important mathematician. What’s the point in looking at mathematical achievements exclusively by men? Weather you like it or not woman have and will continue to produce great work. If there were equal achievements I would say sure, break them up by sex but since woman have been oppressed out of getting educations in so many cultures for so long woman haven’t made as many achievements. How can you be that again…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:46 AM
0

Why not just a book looking at what humans have done in math? What do you have against that?
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:37 AM
0

No one calls that wrong just like no one says she is more right than he. I’m gonna go out on a limb here and make an observation. You’re on Amazon India and India is known for being a hotbed for mistreatment of woman. I kind of think maybe you’ve got some skeletons in your closet (or on your conscience). What is so wrong with the idea that males are not a master race?
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:36 AM
-1

You completely ignored my question, can you not answer it? We do need gender neutrality in both directions. Ultimately it shouldn’t matter if someone is a man or a woman as long as their good enough for the job, however your attitude is counter to that productivity.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:28 AM
-1

He, she, it. Him, her, their. Gender assignment of a subject of the discourse. You’re upset about grammar.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:26 AM
-3

Give me an example of one of these books please. And I literally just suggested People of Math, not woman of math. Calm your shit. Is men of mathematics as a title really more beautiful? It’s a title little dude.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:24 AM
-1

No dude, it’s a pronoun. When a female colleague makes the same amount of money as you with less responsibilities in the same job then it’s an issue. You’re scared of pronouns..
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:22 AM
-5

If gender doesn’t matter why you so butt hurt over a title change? How about People of Mathematics? Edit: I’m saying this as a man, I seriously don’t understand all the hubbah over pronouns.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:19 AM
-1

Yeah she’s only responsible for algorithms. Why did you report it?
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:11 AM
1

r/theredpill
/r/MensRights24/02/19 08:56 AM
2

She was like twice my age and I got the feeling she didn’t feel as sexy as the younger girls we were around so I made her feel extra special, when she told me to go hit on girls my own age I asked if I was weird because she was so much younger than me and I probably looked like an old creeper talking to her. Etc etc, I think that line is sometimes a test to see just how interested we are.
/r/seduction19/02/19 04:34 AM
1

I have only tried it on one older lady and it worked but you make a fair point.
/r/seduction19/02/19 04:27 AM
-2

Tell her you don’t want a girl you want a woman when she sent you off to hit on other girls.
/r/seduction19/02/19 04:04 AM
1

You’re putting a lot on this kid, and you are grouping me into something I am not part of. Not everyone on this sub has to be right leaning, I lean right on some economic topics but left on a lot of the social ones but that’s neither here nor there. Digression. You are assuming this kid saw the ad, formulated a Machiavellian plan to dominate the news cycle and internet conversation, attended a rally with lots of cameras as a counter protestor and then went on to be immensely disrespectful. Becau…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:21 AM
1

All that to say nothing, impressive banter my idiotic friend. Here’s a video that explains how to punctuate.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:59 AM
1

I’m indoctrinated? I included a definition there for you... it’s synonymous with brainwashed. I couldn’t think of a word that encapsulated both butt-hurt and brainwashed for you unfortunately so I’ll leave you with this. An eye for an eye makes everyone go blind, IF the kid was instigated he was still out of line. Annnnd, please stop using the term ‘black supremacist’, it makes r/mensrights seem ridiculous when you bring that nonsense to town.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:41 AM
1

You don’t? Are we seriously digressing from men’s rights and into the topic of disrespecting Native Americans? I can’t get behind that, sorry bud. The kid should be punched and so should whoever raised him. It’s not a men’s rights issue at all, it is about basic human decency. Please justify calling me a nazi. I’m interested by that one.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:26 AM
1

Ok, I’m a straight man but I’ll blow anyone who punches the kid in lieu.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:18 AM
4

I see, pick your battles dude.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 07:25 PM
4

This says 1 in 6 which is still incredibly high, I would drop that one.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 07:21 PM
7

A group of men might be less intimidating than a group of teenage boys. Teenagers do be unpredictable sometime.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 12:04 PM
2

‘She was raped you stupid piece of shit’ - in the voice of the slightly more eloquent redneck football fan from the water boy.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 07:23 PM
3

Golden, just sell it.
/r/seduction04/10/18 05:55 AM
1

Talk to her, it’s early in the semester yet, if you can make your relationship innocuous and about the coursework then sooner or later you’ll get to do a project with her. If you think you like her don’t rush in.
/r/seduction04/10/18 05:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter