TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gamer_zzzz Archive

View 0 posts and 104 comments by gamer_zzzz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

My comment was about offering services and discounts to people, not about refusing service to someone, they are two very different things......
/r/MensRights30/09/19 11:00 PM
1

Ask her for last test results......
/r/askTRP17/07/19 10:07 AM
6

In the modern world of online shopping and being able to work from home, avoiding people is very much a modern viable solution.
/r/MGTOW09/07/19 04:09 AM
13

Well if you never go anywhere near a woman then you won't get accused of anything. But that's a bit extreme.
/r/MGTOW09/07/19 02:26 AM
7

Threesome 🤷‍♂️
/r/askTRP30/06/19 10:30 PM
1

I personally do not agree with it. So you do not agree with men and women getting free/discounted stuff on fathers day and mothers day? OK fair enough.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:31 PM
1

There is a difference between a perminant difference and a 1 day promotion... So you're saying that places that have one day promotions for things like mothers day and fathers day where they receive a free coffee or meal or discount on that respective day is illegal?
/r/MensRights05/05/19 09:46 PM
1

That favour to the neighborhood earns them return customers and happy customers, so even though that product itself doesn't make money, those customers keep coming back and has a chance of buying something else while there which will make them money. And promotions like the dress like a cow day, sure it loses them a few dollars for each meal they give away, but how much free social media advertising are they getting from all the customers that take photos and share the funny costumes. There are …
/r/MensRights05/05/19 01:44 AM
1

The same reasons shops don't have all their items permanently on sale, the novalty wears off if its the norm, instead of a limit time offer. The business themselves would have their own data can look at the numbers and decide if it was worth doing, chances are if it didn't bring more people and more sales then they wouldn't do it again..... In short, Events and promotions are how many businesses keep people coming back, if it's every day it's no longer enticing.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 11:37 PM
0

Also how is it not costing me any money? I am literally having to pay for the table. You would of been paying the same price any other day of the week, so it not costing you anymore money than usual. It not like it's a 365 day offer its a once in a blue moon even...... Bisnesses are allowed to charge whatever they want for a service as well as offer discounts or complimentary services to whoever they want, it's a free market, you don't have to go to the bar you can go to any of the other bars in…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 11:10 PM
3

I believe any of these Ladies Nights, or ladies only discount are discriminatory and should not be supported. But as someone actively seeking a Girlfriend I find it may be a good opportunity to attend. They are not being discimatory, they are just doing a promotional or advertising ploy to get more people to the bar, you said it yourself your thinking of going because you are actively seeking a girlfriend, the bars promotion has increased the amount of women that will be attending the bar so the…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:21 PM
18

You're asking her to wax and to suck your dick, but feel disrespected when she asked you to do the same thing? What's the problem?
/r/askTRP18/02/19 09:17 PM
1

The article says she is in prison for 7 years 10 months ..... Your title is very misleading.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:39 PM
1

Sure teens sexting might be considered normal. But sharing Those picture around school without the other person's permission isn't or at least shouldn't be considered normal. That's considered revenge porn.
/r/askTRP04/12/18 07:18 PM
6

If he has pictures of your sister naked or having sex then he is in possession of child pornography, if he has done it before to others then sounds like he is already in possession of child pornography. So if he has been spreading girls pictures around someone should report him to the police for both possession of child pornography as well as revenge porn.
/r/askTRP04/12/18 09:23 AM
1

Why do you live with your mother if you hate women so much? Wouldn't you prefer to get away from her as well? Considering she is also a woman.
/r/MGTOW25/09/18 07:41 AM
35

If she chose a hair style from the catalogue that he usually cuts, and the end result matches that choice, then doesn't matter if she doesn't like it, he completed the haircut to the specifications. She wouldn't have a leg to stand on. It sucks that she has been able to sue for what she has and should of just been thrown out. But only offering a limited catalogue to choose from is a good solution for the future to protect others from this shit.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 01:17 PM
4

Hence why Human's have the largest penis to body proportion among mammals. I think you should check your facts, humans do not have the largest penis to body ratio. When you spout shitty false facts like that it makes your entire theory look like shit.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/18 08:34 AM
1

Haha yeah, it's floored logic that OP wants to ignore.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 04:06 AM
3

Who your kids choose to fuck has no baring on their career path. Again that still doesn't warrant teaching or controlling them differently. You yourself spout AWALT so why try and stop your daughter from riding the carousel if it's inevitable? You can't spout that crap and then try and change it at the same time. So which one is it? Will your daughter be AWALT or is AWALT a lie?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 01:22 AM
2

It is a double standard if you are trying to control their personals lives differently. Teach them the same and let them make their own decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 01:09 AM
3

So you are going to raise your kids with a double standard, allowing your son to fuck as much as he wants but not allow your daughter to do the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 01:02 AM
1

I'm curious if this post is another one of your throwaways, because it has a similar theme to your fake post. https://www.reddit.com/r/relationships/comments/8pe0g4/ive_30f_been_going_to_a_therapeutic_massage_place
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/18 11:00 PM
7

If you are too afraid to see people react the same with a gender swap then it doesn't prove anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/18 10:10 PM
8

So showing that people would give the same answers if it was a man instead of a woman wouldn't hurt your point? To prove your point you should of just gender swapped the original thread you linked, you changed so many things the comparison is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/18 10:06 PM
4

So are you going to make a gender swap of the fake story?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/18 10:00 PM
2

If they want to fuck multiple people why even have an exclusive partner at all why not just be single or in an open relationship? Why treat their partner as less than a friend?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 02:49 PM
2

Cheating is pretty much text book two faced. Considering it's a synonymous with words like deceitful, dishonest, deceptive. Which is exactly what they are doing to their partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 02:30 PM
2

That doesn't make them any less of a douche, just makes them two faced.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 02:09 PM
2

I wouldn't be best buds with a Cheater. Just like loyalty is earned it can also be lost, cheating is a good way to lose loyalty points in my friend group. Prioritising the health and safety of an innocent person over a douche bag friend, sounds pretty reasonable to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 01:26 PM
3

Smoking weed is a victimless crime. Infidelity isn't, there are other people getting hurt and affected. And loyalty is a pretty shitty excuse to not worry about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 01:18 PM
3

Depending where you live infidelity is actually a crime. And breaking loyalty isn't a crime anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 01:07 PM
3

But you have no loyalty to the person being robbed. So why do you care about them. But don't care about the person being cheated on who is being robbed of their exclusiveness, as well as opening them up to std's etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 12:44 PM
2

OK so if your friend was robbing people you would turn him in to the police?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 12:39 PM
3

Where do you draw the line at loyalty? Would you stay quiet if your friend killed someone? Raped someone? robbed someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 05:23 AM
15

Hugh explicitly told the director You seem to be twisting the facts, in that interview he says he joking told the director, very different to explicitly.
/r/MGTOW03/05/18 10:13 PM
26

If you look at the dates on the 2 statements the top statement was said 2 years after the second, so she could have easily changed her view in that time. Statement 1 Emma 24 years old. Statement 2 Emma 22 years old. Sources to those articles would be good too.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 09:38 PM
2

There is also a blood test than can be done instead of a finger up the bum.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 01:37 PM
1

But why not make that decision known before pregnancy, the same as condoms/pill and STD tests. Why wait till after conception voice that decision. If a man get a women pregnant that does not agree with abortion she is going to carry that baby to term no matter what the man chooses. Alternatively if a man doesn't agree with abortion but get a women pregnant and she does agree with abortion then has the right to have one. But for both those cases the best choice would of been for both couples to k…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 12:44 AM
1

It is not a equal comparison, being pregnant is a emotional and physical strain on a person's body. Just like having an abortion is also a big decision that can affect the patient. Men can not deal with either of those choices first hand so there is no comparison to have.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 12:21 AM
1

It goes both ways, both people should consider talking about it, just like STD tests, if someone know they have an STD they need to tell the other, but if someone doesn't want to get an STD they should take the initiative to ask if the other has been tested. My original comment mention that I think the current law should change to allow an opt out if abortion was agreed upon beforehand. First talk to the wife and figure out why, Then file for divorce/annulment if she is unreasonable about aborti…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:19 PM
1

Just like discussing contraceptives is your responsibility so should be what happens if they fail. If you don't want to have a baby or support one then discuss that beforehand. If she is against abortions then don't have sex with her. If she agree abortion is the right thing to do in case of pregnancy then go for it. Ps. Child support is there to support the child not the mother.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 10:28 PM
1

I feel that "financial abortion" should allowed if the subject of abortion is agreed upon when discussing contraception with a sexual partner. It's one thing to assume that because you are botching using contraceptives you don't want to get pregnant, it another thing to assume that the women is comfortable with getting an abortion in case the contraceptives fail. So if abortion is agreed upon and then the women changes her mind once pregnant "financial abortion" should be allowed, if what happen…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:49 PM
4

There isnt much information about what happened, it's a bit early to claim that the women caused the murder without know what actually happened in the lead up to the victim being shot.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 05:05 AM
1

It was a very dramatic rant that try to say women have all the power but men should get all the power and be able to just walk away from supporting a child they conceived. Child support is only about 20% not Half of income unless you have multiple children to support and even then it's go up to about 40%. The baby a man creates grows in the women's body so she gets more say in what happens to the growing baby, but the man still helped make it and so should help support it. So if you don't want t…
/r/MensRights18/09/17 10:35 PM
1

What does that have to do with my comment, I said that if before sex abortion was agreed to be the way to handle an unplanned pregnancy then the man should be allowed to relinquish all rights to the baby, that allows the man to be protected from the simple WHIM of a pregnant women.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 10:32 PM
-1

If abortion is an agreed upon method in case of emergency and then the women changes her mind then the man should be allowed to relinquish all responsibility. But asking for an abortion after conception and then finding out the women doesn't agree on abortion is your own fault for not finding that out before hand.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:06 PM
2

fight toxic feminism. What does this have to do with feminism?
/r/MensRights16/09/17 01:58 PM
2

So you didn't watch the video about the phone or click on any of the "learn more" buttons on the main page, because if you did you would have found some white males included.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 06:03 AM
3

You reference Linda Fairsten as saying 50% are false, yet you original statement is about 95% false so you don't even believe your own sources? Do you have a link or reference to the German investigator?
/r/MensRights04/09/17 01:15 AM
3

Fair enough, well here is another link that has the original photo unedited, it still only shows 2 full cakes but can see parts of other cakes that looks to say "Dad", and "pop❤" etc, which helps show that the surrounding cakes are father's day messages. http://www.oversixty.com.au/finance/money-banking/2017/09/outrage-over-woolworths-fathers-day-cake/
/r/MensRights04/09/17 01:11 AM
5

You just reworded and completely changed your original question. Again avoiding the valid answer.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 12:35 AM
1

And you are the one defending the original misleading photo.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 12:29 AM
3

I expect Woolworths to do nothing because it's a non issue. Sure the photo doesn't prove it was surrounded by fathers day cakes, but it doesn't prove that their was more than one special person's cake either. What it does prove is there is at least one cake saying "dad" which is a father's day message, and one that says "special person's day" which worst case show inclusion of other people while not trying to remove fathers day. I don't see a problem with this.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 12:15 AM
2

Multiple news articles like the one I link on a different comment all say majority of the cakes had father's day messages on them.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 12:05 AM
1

http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/retail/woolworths-special-persons-day-cake-sparks-shopper-outrage/news-story/bb99b77713fd7b65ca86f837dd2acf1c
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:47 PM
1

Oh just like OP did my bad, sorry I should have worded it better, used "most of the surrounding cakes" instead of "all surrounding cakes".
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:44 PM
1

What trick? OP original post tried to say that Woolworth had chosen to not sell father's day cakes and instead sell special person's day cakes, I just supplied the photo including a surrounding cake to prove that it wasn't the case.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:11 PM
6

What should be done about rape being hard to prove is a separate issue to your original view that 95% of rape claims are false, and so every time someone gives the valid response of it is hard to prove, you change the topic to something else, instead of acknowledging that it is a valid rebuttal to your original view.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:07 PM
3

Will have to wait and see. I wouldn't be surprised if there is at least a cake or two saying the same thing on mothers day. If all the cakes said it sure get pissed and riot, but it was only one or two cakes in a see of father and dad cakes. I don't see it as the big issue people are making it out to be.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:35 PM
3

All of the surrounding cakes had father's day messages on them. It not like all the cakes said "special person's day" on them. Edit: Here is a copy of the photo without the top cake cropped out. http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/ef4756a136a573d858f5df8aadae19ea
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:28 PM
2

How do you try and fix it? Are you deleting and changing what is there or just adding more stuff to include your opinion.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:36 AM
3

He wrote men pay more. I asked a question of why people even pay for tinder at all, it is a free app.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 10:15 PM
5

People pay for tinder?
/r/MensRights02/09/17 02:32 PM
3

If you look at the list of infringements in the "metro manners" manspreading isn't actually there, it just falls under "occupying more than one seat" so handbags on seats are the same thing. It's just tabloid new reporting blowing manspreading out of proportion.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 12:20 PM
11

occupying more than one seat, is part of the "metro manners" that manspreading has been added to, so purses taking up a seat is also a fine.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:46 PM
1

Haha all good, I have been a victim of autocorrect more than once.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 12:05 AM
9

How does an 8 day old baby give consent?
/r/MensRights24/08/17 11:43 AM
2

I was thinking the same thing, the quote seems to get quoted when articles talk about her, but now where seems to have any information about where/when it was said.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 03:57 AM
1

You just continue like normal, someone not wearing a bra shouldn't bother you, do you care if guys leave the house without underwear on.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:27 AM
9

Does he have a divorce lawyer to help him? It could be that she is asking for that much instead of a long term alimony payments, because she has been a stay at home wife that's accustomed to her way of living due to his income. So depending on how much your friend earns a year, it might be a better offer than long term alimony. Still a pretty shit deal for your friend.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 04:03 AM
2

Then go test it with a few skirt/dresses with a girlfriend or sister or mannequin or something. It's not as impossible as you think.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:41 PM
4

Is it ladies only swimming time, or is it a swimming class that is ladies only but men can still enter the pool and swim not involved in the class? What other classes do they offer? Have men every tried to request a men's only class? Are the unisex classes as well?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:52 AM
2

Sounds like a waste of time. And if you are not paying for each of those copies then it's technically illegal because you are copying the movie without permission.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 05:10 AM
3

https://youtu.be/qt_U1-tXEBY This silly commercial shows that a skirt can but lifted at the back without it being noticeable from the from. Just because there are no ruffles doesn't mean it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 04:47 AM
1

Like some companies can choose to only cater to men if they please (can't think of any examples off the top of my head). Gentlemen Clubs, most of them a unisex now but some are still men only.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 04:36 AM
1

Talk to the gym and ask for them to explain their reasoning behind the women's only section.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 10:57 PM
1

Ah k, would have liked to watch the segment. The few news segments I have seen about B.A.C.A don't mention who the assaulters, and don't make it look limited to male assaulters, the focus is on helping the victim.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 02:02 PM
2

What news program was it on?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:51 PM
1

https://www.legalzoom.com/knowledge/divorce/topic/spousal-support-alimony
/r/MensRights10/08/17 01:26 PM
2

Dude's that divorce loaded women also claim spousal support.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 10:24 AM
3

She doesn't account for cases where discussion of abortion have been agreed upon before sex then the women changes her mind and chooses to keep the baby.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:01 AM
5

So couldn't the same thing be said about the defendant, if there is nothing in his sexual past relevant to the case then it isn't going to be included.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 02:57 AM
5

True "retaliation" was probably a strong word.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:24 AM
10

It actually says this is in retaliation to a women's sexual history being brought up in court. If the victims history is allowed then the defendants history should also be allowed.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 12:57 AM
5

The link doesn't work.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 10:16 PM
2

So then hire a lawyer and get it sorted.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 10:56 AM
2

Is there a reason he is behind on the child support?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 05:42 AM
1

Were that stat's for women in relationships or women looking for ONS's?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 04:46 AM
1

Which article? you didn't actually link one.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:51 AM
2

Ah I did not know that they were here in Australia. Curious if protesting at the clinics would be more or less successful than protesting at say government offices. Show your local members of government that the law needs to change.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:06 AM
7

Tradition is not a good enough reason cut his babies penis. Just because he had it done doesn't make it acceptable. The solution to it being cleaner is to just teach your child how to wash his penis. If he is going to use Jewish traditions as an excuse then make him stick too all the other jew traditions as well.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 03:55 AM
2

Well it still points you in the right direction, and with everyone's DNA on file it should be easier to pinpoint the father. And I guess you just ask the whole family who banged the mother. Also with the giant influx of money for DNA tests there would potentially be funds to help improve accuracy.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 01:50 AM
2

Can we keep all DNA result on file for cross reference to find the biological father. And also help with crimes with unmatched DNA samples?
/r/MensRights06/08/17 01:22 AM
17

There are circumcision clinics? I thought they just did them at hospitals.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 11:44 AM
3

O’Brien plans to rotate through charities every three months, with the first instalment dedicated to Elizabeth Morgan House, which provides specialised support to Aboriginal women and children who suffer from family violence. From one of the articles about it.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 03:35 AM
0

They aren't denied, does it say anywhere that the female customers can't donate?
/r/MensRights05/08/17 03:20 AM
3

The 18% extra cost is optional, if you don't want to pay then pay the normal price. The extra cost goes to charity. Or just go to a different Cafe.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 02:51 AM
3

The 18% extra cost is optional, if you don't want to pay then pay the normal price. The extra cost goes to charity. Or just go to a different Cafe.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 02:46 AM
1

So you have been an MRA since 2014 so in the last 3 years, what active contributions have you made to any activism to help men?
/r/MensRights05/08/17 12:14 AM
1

There are plenty of laws that discriminate against one gender or the other, but most of them are old and probably never enforced even thought they haven't been officially removed from law books.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 11:34 AM
2

How often are you getting sex dude?
/r/TheRedPill18/07/17 01:09 PM
10

So what does she do with herself when she is waiting around to fuck you?
/r/TheRedPill18/07/17 12:17 PM
13

So pretty much when you were a 20 year old adult you couldn't get yourself an adult girlfriend and instead caught yourself an innocent 17 year old teenager to groom to your liking. She honestly sounds like more trouble/effort than she is worth, 10-20 unanswered messages at a time, and your pretty much at her slave when your actually together.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/17 12:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter