TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

garacus Archive

View 0 posts and 217 comments by garacus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

rage bait doesn't last into trends that go on for months dude...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 10:29 PM
1

And not just staying together for some easy access to casual sex. No, that would be a FWB, which is rarer than those who succeed at getting hookups or relationships. So I don't think that's it either. I seriously don't know how you think I'm arguing for what you're arguing, when even you admit there are plenty of guys right there, with no/little standards, who largely/entirely want sex. At best, I can see how we're converging on more than I expected. You are now talking about time-frames. This v…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 12:54 AM
1

Yes, but you can seriously date without trying to go toward marriage straight away as well. Most relationships are probably more organic anyway, where you essentially both decide to go through each milestone when you feel ready/compatible. Nevertheless, it clearly matters what frame of reference you mean by 'most guys' anyway? Like what demographic were you mainly talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 11:50 PM
1

Most people in frats don't date seriously. If those are your frame of reference then you aren't thinking straight. I'd say most people at that age, men or women, don't date seriously at that age, period. After all, plenty just swipe all day for an ego boost, think they're trying to find Mr/Ms right, yet flake at the slightest sense of imperfection even once. They think that's trying to 'date seriouslt' but they're deluding themselves when they think that. It's a Gen Z/late Millennial issue, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 11:18 PM
1

pretty sure he didn't mean 'literally all,' ofc he meant with attractive women in the opinion of that man, because no one would sleep with someone they felt was unattractive, unless if they were desperate or had such a small pool to choose from. He also said these men acting like this make women: The one[s] who are at the top are sampling every woman out there and this frustrates women as well. I agee the OP whether agreeable or not, is being massively hyperbolic though. I'm strictly referring t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 11:14 PM
2

Half of American women are legally married or living with a partner by 26. Those guys they’re with can’t all be cream of the crop. No, but statistically they're dating older men, who even if they don't have the looks, would statistically have better finances, assets, and experiences. Whilst men dating younger women are likely only dating up in terms of looks more. Typical people don’t need to use dating coaches. If a person has hired a dating coach, it’s a pretty good indication that they’re una…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 02:07 PM
7

"Most dudes have standards when it comes to relationships" Ahahahaha, have you been to the average frat society? Or even much of campus life in general? 😂 Heck, ever been in one of those stereotypical men's locker room talks on women? Either you're not actually a (cis) man, due to your different gender icon, or you've somehow avoided the ~20s and under male groups. There have been plenty of times when I've warned other men Ik, or friends with, to stay away from certain women because they have te…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 01:59 PM
8

I mean, you also realise if people didn't believe in it, they wouldn't watch it either, right? Like whether we like it or not, unfortunately Andrew Tate is clearly popular and listened to. If he weren't, we wouldn't know about him.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 01:51 PM
2

Whilst I agree there are far more standards men have to meet, at least initially in dating, as women are the gatekeepers there, you surely know some of your points are hilariously hyperbolic and subjective, right? Like as much of a 'magenta pill' as I am, I can therefore sometimes take the women's side more. I appreciate how hard it is for women to go through even the most basic skincare and make-up routine, and quite frankly men that say they'd find the women just as attractive with little to n…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 01:49 PM
1

Imagine thinking comparing abuse victims to desperate men is a good idea. Imagine not understanding it wasn't meant to be a 1:1 equal comparison, just an example of how epistemologically weak your point is If you want to make it more comparable though, then let's say 'women having an attitude' could also mean a woman being verbally abusive and manipulative to a man then. Now THAT would be abuse too...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 12:05 AM
2

By that logic, you could use this to victim blame women who go through awful relationships, maybe even abuse, because they like so called 'bad boys': just seems like victim blaming here. Idc how easy or hard it is for people to date, I'd generally agree it's easier for women. Men only usually complain though, when those same women who have it easy, complain about the most minor things in comparison with all the dating issues men have to face, like 1st world problems. If you don't want us complai…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 04:01 AM
1

He also debunks the idea that otherwise good men do poorly because of some unforseen negative character trait like hidden misogyny or something. Especially this. The amount of times people will also almost automatically pathologise those who have been 'chronically single' (as men) as if they must be 'misogynists' or 'creeps' etc. Is telling I wouldn't be surprised if they do this, because acknowledging the reality that they're just unlucky on the superficial front, or don't act overly cocky and …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 02:18 AM
1

stfu deleted commentor
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 02:10 AM
1

While money (or at least the facade of money) doesn't mean you're good at giving financial advice, it definitely gives you more legitimacy than someone poor True, but the ironic thing is, those who are rich and don't necessarily bang on about it, are probably by far better financial advisers than those who buy fancy cars, and eat caviar all the time. With the exception of the stupidly rich who don't know what to do with the money pouring out their ears ofc e.g Musk. That's because spending money…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 01:13 AM
5

wow, 3 ditsy, gossipy, valley girls conflating healthy relationships automatically with boredom and scheduling. Typical lmao how is a healthy relationship at all mutually inclusive with routine and non spontaneity? By that logic, is spontaneity and excitement somehow toxic traits? Ofc not lmao... No I don't find healthy relationships boring, that's bloody stupid. I find boring relationships boring, and boring relationships can come from healthy AND unhealthy relationships. There is no mutual inc…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 06:28 AM
1

haha, exactly! Thank fuck the lesbians Ik are reasonable, so I'm more than happy sympathising with them
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 03:40 AM
1

they might just not want a relationship at the moment. I'm clearly only talking about lesbians who are trying to pursue a relationship currently though... Otherwise ofc, those who aren't looking for a relationship aren't going to be included in a discussion on those pursuing relationships. So with that in mind, why are so many lesbians who are LOOKING for relationships, so often single and frustrated, compared to straight or gay men according to you then? At least by proportional percentage wise…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 05:13 AM
6

"I've seen lesbians say it's hard to get a date, but never making it look like it's a woman's only problem" There are likely far less lesbian women getting into relationships with other women, than men with women proportionately. So wouldn't the natural common denominator here be women therefore? Not saying that it makes women a 'problem' either ofc, but it seems clear that for whatever reason, the gender dynamics of women make it harder for them to date eachother. Also makes sense the other way…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:32 AM
3

Not that I agree with RP talking points, at least not entirely, but you really can't compare LGBT dynamics with straight ones for a number of reasons, including: opposite genders, and how on average each gender sees differently to eachother; different social culture and behaviour; different communities. Also, tbh I think lesbians have a very small pool of relationships to make any average assumption here. Plenty of lesbians will tell you how hard they find it to find other lesbians, and attract …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:28 AM
1

If anything, the numbers on both sides are heavily inflated. People be acting like the 40% top guys on the whole infamous '60:40 Tinder ratio' be Genghis Khan or some shit. Guaranteed 99% of those 'top guys' just get viewed more by women, they might get the average amount of sex and dates otherwise. The 1% of dudes might get to sleep around quite a bit, but again just about none of them are able to sleep with 100 women in 1 year... Just as hookup culture that was marketed at late millennials and…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 02:19 AM

No? We haven't changed our biology, evolution takes at least hundreds of thousands of years. At best, we've 'tamed' our evolution through civil society, but we're still "apes in suits" as the saying goes. At best, your social disciplining might socially enforce new behaviours, but they won't change our baseline biology
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:12 AM
0

right, so how can we change biology then?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 02:28 AM
1

fair, but it's just not really going to happen. I'd even go into sociological/evolutionary reasons for why that is: - women stick together probably for protection, and need more protection - pack animals usually have the men prowling around - 99% of the time, women are going to be pickier than men, whilst men are going to be the 'picked' - testosterone makes us more territorial, and more aggressively sexual. There's a reason 'cat fights' are a relatively rare/'interesting' phenomenon and they do…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 11:17 PM
1

You keep enabling this norm. You could simply not do it. That's what I'm saying. perhaps in principle, you're correct, but that's just not how that works in reality. I mean, you could also tell people to stop paying for overpriced things to force price lowering, or stop watching lazily made shows to force better creativity etc. But that's just not going to happen. A lot of people, especially now, are impatient. Most men aren't going to wait just to possibly shift social norms, they will pursue. …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 06:19 AM
1

that's true, but also exactly why people shouldn't feed into that either i.e the amount of times I've heard say, rape victims get involved in gender debates, and always act like only their perception and opinion is correct, and everyone else is wrong/should always shut up is ridiculous. Yes, ofc these victims should be listened to, sympathised with, not swept aside etc. But this 'logic' in this day and age that if you 'don't have as much victim points' as someone else, apparently you're objectiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 10:07 PM
2

People just need to use their imagination then. Women have it easier in general with choice and opportunity compared to men, BUT they're also up against more forward/unsubtle guys when you might not be ready, far more likely to come across male creeps than female creeps (from my experience at least), and whilst I dont think it's helpful to fear most men for it rape is a legitimate concern and fear ofc. That's the exact issue with gender politics these days though: no side seems to take the time …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 01:17 AM
4

just masturbate a lot lol. I've legit almost never had a wet dream. Sexual dreams yes, but wet dreams, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 08:34 AM
3

Men can always choose not to date someone they don't like I think you're missing the point. It's not about not having the power to reject, anyone can reject. It's about having the power to be the selector. It's still very much the norm that men are the suitors and need to approach, and women are the ones who pick from there. That's exactly why OP correctly says women who like you will put themselves in your presence, but you as a man ultimately still have to approach. You're also forgetting the …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 08:33 AM
1

Yeah but that effects our current culture and evolution, does it not? By negative aspects of romans historically as you said last time, I took it to mean back when in most of human history we married for resources, diplomacy, and/or territory, love was secondary if at all. I don't think this is so relevant on an evolutionary basis, and more of a social thing. Secondly, perhaps the only time in human history, the last few decades have been a time when how we conduct ourselves romantically and sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 03:06 AM
1

Oohh I see, yeah entirely agreed man. It probably doesn't help that testosterone makes us more forward and aggressive as well, which is probably why we get territorial and possessive of women we see as potential date/sex partners. Ofc I'm not saying we're cavemen, or that we can't control ourselves, ofc we can, but I'm sure you get what I mean as a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 03:01 AM
1

I took it to the assumption that we were talking about the present day only though, or at least that's the frame I'm talking in. But yes, I agree with you on that historical take. It did incense some former friends, from experience. I've also heard women complain that this is apparently akin to men 'only wanting to have sex with them,' which is reductionist of men's feelings as if we only think ever think of sex, and once again no different to men who were so called 'friendzoned' complaining abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 02:57 AM
5

we feel the same when you generalise men haha this subreddit is specifically about gender debates though...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 01:26 AM
1

I largely agree, though some scientific studies are showing that this 'men are visual vs women are not' is somewhat challenged, but how each gender reflects themselves in society this is still generally true. I disagree men can't be just friends with women, and that those women friends can only be 'hot' to the man. That's literal high school and younger thinking. I'd agree though that it's often more likely that men are more likely to want to date and/or have sex with some female friends more of…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 01:24 AM
1

for most of the planet, romantic and sexual interest is also positive though... We kind of wouldn't have an existent human race without it. Nevertheless, it's never positive for anyone to have unrequited feelings for someone else, whilst they'll never reciprocate back, or worse have to see the one they love be with someone else in front of them. That goes for both genders. Again, not the fault of the person not reciprocating the feelings ofc, but the friendship to the unrequited lover is not 'po…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:23 AM
3

oh I agree, I'm just saying some women feel as entitled to a friendship with a man, as some men do with thinking they're entitled to a woman's affection.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 10:47 PM
3

I've said that to former female friends before when I already had/gained feelings for them, and they didn't. May as well be the equivalent bad and entitled reaction I get against me, as women who experience guys who got rejected by them acting like arseholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 02:17 PM
3

Media had complained a lot to men to not approach, hence almost all men who could've listened aren't approaching and almost all men who wouldn't listen in any case are still doing it and it's pretty easy to decide which type of men were actually not wanted by women to approach. Exactly why neither TRP, nor feminists should make such stupid generalisations for all 51% or 49% respectively of humanity. They end up with shit like this, where no one wins.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 02:13 PM
2

I never got this, and it's one of the most astounding feminist contradictions out there. While it's a general correct point to say disproportionately more men (operative word being disproportionately here) are likely to SA women than vice versa is true, is a far cry to justify fear/hatred of an entire group of people, one of the biggest groups on the planet (49% of the planet broadly speaking is male). No more justifying than it is for a racist to hate all black people, because they may be dispr…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 02:08 PM
1

"A better man who can actually play the game she likes" Why do people act like socially awkward people are the literal worst thing you could get? I'd think someone who's abusive, neglecting, cheating etc. Would be far worse. Why should a woman put up with a socially awkward man? Because, what if he's pretty much the perfect partner to her otherwise? But that's just the thing, you types claim the game is more important than a fulfilling relationship...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:35 PM
1

Who says it should be? And that's probably the point with bad communication. You assume every new relationship, each will just intuitively know their gendered role. Yet, we live in a time now where gendered roles have largely been deconstructed. Sure, on average it seems men tend to do the bins, and women the laundry still, but because of that deconstruction, you can't assume every single man and woman is going to fit the same gendered roles. This isn't the 1950s in terms of cookie cutter gender…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:30 PM
4

Haha true that man. What's even more hypocritical is they'll ignore any legitimate social issues men might disproportionatly face here based on 'just do better bro.' But there are plenty of women who think men are misogynist for having their own often times also superficial preferences of women... Like I dont think it's a coincidence that most fat acceptance advocates are women. Honestly, if you're a fat dude, you're going to get it a LOT harder than a fat woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 02:48 AM
1

lmao, you say it isn't true, but you just described how it is true XD
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 01:08 AM
-1

I think you're missing the point here based on occupation. Is Trump a good leader, at least by average standards and in terms of being moulded to become a leader? Fuck no. Is he a political 'nuclear bomb' that a lot of self professed disenfranchised people like, and a showman to get that audience motivated? Fuck yes. Kamala is none of the latter. Populists aren't supposed to be academic, they don't need experience in the political order, nor do they need to be composed. If anything, if they are,…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 09:00 AM
1

women tend to be more tender and subtle lovers. The difference between men and women romantically and sexually, would be like the difference between a mukbang and a food connoisseur respectively. Women are a lot more varied and interesting in that department, and they take the emotional and sensual parts of life in all its capacity. Men are on average, a lot more unsubtle and too down the line in the inverse. Speaking somewhat from experience, being bi to a degree sexually, although only straigh…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 04:35 AM
6

Still pretty dumb though imo, or at least very subjective. I can imagine plenty of actual rape victims would still have preferred to have lived through that, than die... If that weren't the case, then we wouldn't have rape survivors, only those who did survive and more or less immediately committed suicide
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:33 PM
2

Funny that, isn't it? It's only ok when feminists use dumb, insulting, and generalising analogies apparently
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:32 PM
6

Yeah this lol. I got into a rabbithole with a feminist about this and we did happen to show, apparently as a 'gotcha' moment, that you're less likely to die by a bear attack than a man. However, the difference was negligible for starters. Like 0.00006% (US national parks website) and 0.003% (some US government statistics) respectively, but that doesnt even take into account other forms of logic, like the fact you're much more likely to be in the same vicinity as any man (including the other 99.9…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:24 PM
1

you don't know how to add it up? But you're a math teacher... :P Jks, jks. Ok, well lucky you that you have a good partner then, many don't despite trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 08:43 AM
2

Do you do the majority of work and providing financially then?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 07:22 AM
6

Oxford Definition of Pornography Nope, it's any sexual imagery. Even the feminist definition provided there doesn't say otherwise. No, my logic could not be applied to fucking murder, because prostitution and murder are not in the same ballpark 😂 my god, do I really have to spell this out? - prostitutes don't kill people as a job description - (sorry SWERF, but it's true) prostitution, like any sexual activity, can be consensual for both parties Murder is never consensual, and results in people …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 07:21 AM
1

Lmao, same can be said about you then, complaining that most men are like what you claimed 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 07:13 AM
1

I wish that were the case, but as a man who has been on at least TENS of dates with women, at best they might offer to pay half if you're lucky. That could easily be a test to see if you actually accept, and if so, sometimes they cut you out because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 07:09 AM
5

Uh, porn isn't just a photographic image or footage, you realise? It's essentially a drawing of anything considered sexual/pornographic. Like, you've heard of erotic art right? Doesn't require footage, photography, or even a camera. No, legally stripping is not considered the same as prostitution. There's a reason stripper establishments prohibit any sexual touch, because then that becomes PROSTITUTION legally, and therefore would require different licensing, policing, regulations etc. I know be…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 07:06 AM
2

I see, sorry I read it as a continuation of your first point, that assumed porn was a modern thing only
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 07:02 AM
1

You're not the ones having to pay for the food or takeout though 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 03:00 AM
10

Your point is 'obviously' an assumption only for starters. Secondly, you obviously haven't studied a lot of human history, if you think porn is a modern phenomenon. Thirdly, your point that most people don't buy prostitutes is irrelevant, the main point is there has always been people who have nought sexual services, and likely always will. Also sex work doesn't just include prostitution anyway, it also includes stripping which plenty more people watch.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 02:58 AM
3

So what? That doesn't necessarily mean porn was more/less ethical than it is now, just less of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 12:51 AM
6

Well, she's certainly wrong that prostitution has only been a noteworthy issue in the contemporary era though...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 12:50 AM
1

From my flare, I'm probably more biased to men (but not full red pill) but even I don't get why men or trp would want to ban porn... Back when it was big and not just a meme, No Nut November was fucking stupid 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 12:40 AM
0

You're making a lot of assumptions. For starters, no, not everyone thinks its an evil necessarily. Maybe people aren't actively encouraging it, but there are people, including some sex workers themselves who see nothing particularly evil about it. Also, I think it's kind of hilarious if people are talking about sex like it has always been sanctified. Have people missed the fact that sex has broadly been promoted even in general ads in mass media? (Sex sells) the fact that Only Fans exists? Or th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 12:26 AM
1

But if a woman likes a man she will absolutely do something to seal the deal. how often do women ask out men? Almost never, to the point of a negligible amount. There's your answer. They don't try and seal the deal even if they really like you, at best they give you the envelope for you to seal, in a very convoluted way
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 04:56 AM
2

She wants that long churros 😏
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:02 PM
1

More the massive and simplistic generalisations on potentially all men that got to me. If you have to generalise a whole gender, fine, obviously try to avoid strawmen but more importantly make the generalised point at least detailed. Not like "u men dum"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:01 PM
4

Actually, ngl, but I felt romcoms lied to me. But that's on me for falling for that: nothing in media is ever real, or at least it's distorted. I also don't go around trying to ban romcoms, even if they might sometimes have harmful stereotypes against men, partially necause romcoms don't tend to be made for men, unlike feminists complaining about men's fantasy films like James Bond.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:00 PM
2

1) How is this any different to women whinging about how women are portrayed in more male centric movies like James Bond? Both have stupid and sometimes harmful stereotypes, how does pointing that out make one stunted? 2) Idk how many men think like that, but I assume we're working with generalisations the whole time: not that I really think so, but a few men get bitter and jealous because they claim women tend to go for arseholes only. Personally I think this is exaggerated, what women on avera…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 12:55 PM

Yeah, such an odd double standard. Maybe it's simply necsuse feminists get the benefit from said advantage? Reminds me exactly of a Facebook post where I complained about the disappointing actions of BOTH genders on Tinder, and I had some women call me a misogynist, yet they entirely ignored my critique on men and didn't exactly call it misandrist then??? P.S the criticism was somewhat what you're saying, and on Bumble at least, how stupid and pointless it is for women to match with you but then…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 12:40 PM
1

And women don't come out straight to you a stranger and ask you out, they will become your friend and be close to you and then ask you out subtly if you can subtly hint back you like them too then they will (maybe) ask you out. lol, that's the most dilute way to claim they asked you out first, which only sounds technically true there. But you've just proven my point 99% there, by the fact that you still have to know if they like you first through their hints, and flirt with them back before they…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:17 AM
1

Create a slim girls tinder and slim guys and see how it goes then come back to me 5 days ago by rHuDpEeL learn to read...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:13 AM
1

like: Exactly. Call me when men have to remove all of their body hair and paint their faces everyday to be considered acceptable to date. 'waaaaa!' yourself lol XD
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:12 AM
1

Once again, I never claimed victimhood, and you started the thread about who has it worse. Now you're also acting like a child. Why are you still bothering to comment when you keep claiming you're done?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:11 AM
1

That's what I just said?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:51 PM
1

No shit? But this thread was talking about patriarchy apparently being synonymous with imperialism, compared to matriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:44 PM
0

No one is questioning that you CAN be asked out by a woman, we just call bullshit by PROBABILITY that you've NEVER had to approach ANY woman you've ever dated. Anyone can claim they're Casanova or Romeo online, and besides, even THEY still had to approach...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 06:50 PM
1

ofc a patriarchy is men dominating everyone else, that's what it is by definition. Just as a matriarchy is women dominating everyone else. This doesn't at all answer whether a matriarchy can, or can not, be imperialistic. Not a badly as most women Sorry, are you saying there that matriarchy is inherently less bad than patriarchy, despite it still being one specific group dominating over anyone else, and no 'non women' allowed to rule? Because if so, that's nothing but an opinion, no fact or exam…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 06:48 PM
1

Just because it's hardly a thing, doesn't mean it can't be imperialistic. That only means there aren't many examples of practising forms of matriarchy in most large scale societies. I just don't see much of the connection between imperialism and patriarchy in general, outside of stereotyping like: men aggressive, men forceful or something. Imperialism just seems to be more about dominating one group over another, to increase the material and manpower of another nation. I dont see any synonymous …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 10:24 AM
1

Let's put it this way then, from how I got your statement: if patriarchy is a central plank of imperialism in your opinion, where does matriarchy fit in terms of imperialism then?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 02:08 AM
1

Once again, you're projecting. The subject was on how each gender uses Tinder, nothing else. I'm not basing literally any other factor outside of Tinder on this. Please learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 02:07 AM
1

No one is claiming victim hood though... We're clearly just talking about who has it harder in terms of dating...Fuck you're full of projection lol. If you're actually going to say goodbye the first time, then actually be true to your word...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 02:06 AM
1

Lol, so a woman ruled country can't be imperialistic then? I'd like to see you prove that one...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 12:05 PM
0

Yet it'd hurt women a lot more, because they don't ever get to get to the tippy top of the patriarchy...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 12:04 PM
1

It's a numbers game for men, but they're still matching with women they like the look of, at least to a degree... You seem to just cherrypick everything you want to hear, and blindly ignore the rest...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 12:01 PM
1

I'm not moving the goalposts at all... We're talking about dating and attraction, and as has been said many times in this thread, physicality is important to women on how they view men more than it is to men viewing women (imo) after all few guys actually wants abs on women for starters... If anything, you've just deflected every point I've been saying and made me repeat myself several times. But if you want to run with your tail between your legs, so be it. You're the only one who was sad here …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:56 AM
1

You know nothing about me you dick head 😂 Idk why you're suddenly going all rude at me. I already said several times now, if you could read, I dont use the term 'patriarchy' often at all, we were just having a discussion... Stop talking shit, you're literally in a subreddit precisely about gender divisions. Get off your high horse, because you're just a lowly squire then who thinks they know jack shit...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:53 AM
0

A court jester wasn't as much of a 'fool' as they're portrayed for starters. Secondly, still literally better than a peasant...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:51 AM

a what???
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:04 AM

hahaha this question and your answer made me almost burst at work 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 02:57 AM
-1

I think you're mainly grasping at straws, and playing with semantics here. But sure, not every man automatically benefitted from a patriarchy, but in general every patriarchy is ruled by only some people, and all would've been men. Their rules would've therefore also naturally only benefitted those men over other men, and especially over women in general as well. It's a buzz term that oversimplifies everything in favor of portraying women as victims and men as predators. I agree with your last p…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 11:57 PM
2

true, but those people who complain about that are just as incorrect and are just as stupid. They can also be laughed at and ignored due to their incredibly flawed 'analysis'
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 11:44 PM
1

And you think this is a hardship that men have to endure? If they want to actually get a look in by other women, and compete with other men, yes. Or at least are required to be of a fitter standard than women have to on average Or that this somehow means they are held to higher standards of appearance than women? Higher standards of physicality* as you should know by now, I already acknowledged women have more grooming standards than men on average. Lmfao and you're not engaging in this in good …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 11:43 PM
3

You're the one who keeps deflecting even sources given to you here, by making irrelevant comments like "well I don't do it" as if that has anything to do with the sources given to you 😂 It'd be like me ignoring the data that far more women face SA on average than men, and going "well I don't do it." It's an irrelevant and even non sequtur point, and is far more evident of your bias than me...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 09:29 PM
-2

I see ehat you mean. We're talking about men over all these days though, or at least feminists believe we live in a patriarchy, yet most men in general don't get more unfair power over women, and a lot of even our most basic issues are ignored. I mean that with all men too, in fact, black men likely have it even worse. So feminists are making an impossible double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 09:26 PM
4

I only watched about two minutes of that, but she made the most non apology I've ever heard in my entire life, and just wouldn't shut up about it... I'd honestly rather she didn't bother than that shit. That was disgusting, it was basically in a nutshell "I didn't do anything wrong, and YOU'RE the one who did wrong, by pointing out I did something wrong!" If a dude made a comment making light of horrific DV against women, even if he apologised profusely and basically resigned, he'd still likely …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 09:23 PM
-7

Irrelevant distinction, as men gender wise were ruling in general. Also these 'lower men' you're talking about who could own property, had the power to own other human beings. I believe this was much rarer for women to be able to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 09:16 PM
5

You insinuated it...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 09:10 PM
1

I believe I already mentioned that too. My point is, men on average are much less picky, so they'd be happy with many choices of women. Not at all the same with how women feel, because they're a lot pickier. Not really a post about how to change things, but there's no real way to change these dynamics anyway. It's a purely human psychological even evolutionary way of things. It's still in women's best interests to be picky in this sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 09:09 PM

An ideology is essentially a group of ideas on how one thinks society should be run. That takes a government to realise and implement. If simply having more men in government somehow makes a patriarchy, then by that logic all western countries are also white supremacist states, because they all happen to have mainly white people in power too (and in that case, because most western nations have a much larger population proportion of white people) so it's an even more meaningless point...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 09:02 PM
1

And as I just said, as well as another commentor did: fewer women go to the gym as men, or at least, they're doing far less weights, workouts, and regimes than men are...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 08:58 PM
5

You know, if you weren't so snarky, it shouldve been obvious I was mainly talking about pre industrial times... Yeah, being drafted in Vietnam, even since WWI was the end times when you could get anything 'good' for yourself out of war. Once again speaking stereotypically though, men could still largely choose which women to marry, and the women be subservient as per society of the times, pre 60s or so. Now those same veterans wouldn't get any of that. It's an impossibly broad point, but you sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:20 PM
6

It's not pedantic to mention that being against male circumcision is hardly spoken about though, that's entirely relevant to OP's topic... The rest was an aside, but as I already said anyway, pedantic or not, I too am against circumcision, and I agree there are many apologists for it
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:16 PM
1

Now YOU know what you're doing, and don't have your head in the clouds haha (no sarcasm intended)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 01:46 PM

You're missing the point... Yes ofc they have a choice on the women THEY GET, in terms of who to date. But that pool of women they get to date, which also takes longer for them to find is MUCH smaller than an average woman's pool of choice. This isn't exactly that hard of a concept to grasp, especially when we're talking broad numbers for a broad average.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 01:44 PM
7

Nah, hardly anyone talks about it compared to FGM. That being said, I have heard a fair argument that FGM is worse as it permanently damages the woman in many ways, and more heavily affects their future sexual senses compared to circumcision, whilst circumcision tends to have much less complications. That doesn't make male circumcision anymore justified though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 01:42 PM
10

Tbh, even the former doesn't make sense. Why would a ruling group, throw their own group to the wolves? That's now how nepotism works 😂 I can probably buy though, actual patriarchies probably did put men in dangerous situations still, like the days of old with 'warriors' and all, but the pay off would be literal loot, women, and land (not saying we should return to such barbarism) and a lot of it amongst you and the other men if you fought hard. The women had 0 say otherwise, and were treated li…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 01:40 PM
13

I'd probably agree that male SA is laughed at less now, but it's still laughed at in general, even on mainstream talk shows... Your point on why male on male violence happens though is arguably a deflection from the OP's point though, and part of the problem: why does it matter if most murders and physical assaults by men, are done by other men? That's an entirely irrelevant point to make, when OPs point was only on how people take it seriously or not (they don't) this response is exactly what t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 01:34 PM
3

Lol, no wonder you didn't get what I meant by me saying we're the 'pursuers' before. Don't be so naive, wait for women to ask you out, and you'd be a skeleton on a bench. Unless if you're some sort of Brad Pitt type guy, even then, you're not going to get asked out first 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 10:25 AM
5

🤓🤓🤓🤓 Ok? Nice non point there... Bruh how tf did you get that out of it. She literally mentioned either on this thread, or another thread nearby, that she's got soaking wet from a guy making her laugh before, where did you not get any of that?... It's cause you rushed in before it became an attraction. Thanks for actually making a point this time. Plenty of people, men and women would say, the window of opportunity is fairly small between when she's attracted to you, and when she thinks you're n…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 10:16 AM
2

Sure, but I don't think anyone is really virtue signalling that here though?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:54 AM
4

highly ironic, especially with your flare... Plenty of women aren't settling down either, and there are plenty that do end up settling with who they think is only an average attractive guy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:46 AM
4

haha, so you're saying gold diggers don't exist and aren't from the 1st world?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:37 AM
5

It ultimately is though, otherwise explain the phenomenon of why many women tend to date older men, preferably men with more money and qualifications than they do, and have assets to their name? If that's not transactional, then what is?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:16 AM
5

That's because most men are wired to 'throw their net out' as far as it will go. In a perfect world, it'd also be in men's interests to only go after women that they attract, but for us it's never that obvious. Why would it be anyway? We're the pursuers, we have to find out if the women we're going for like us in general, let alone even so much as acknowledge us. I think you're therefore looking at this from the woman's perspective and out, when ofc with the virtue of men not being women, we're …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:13 AM
1

nah, makes sense to me too. I'll admit his syntax is a bit off, but he's essentially saying: he too would date single mothers, but even they (the mothers) seem to dislike men
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 03:14 AM
1

While we're going a bit off topic now, I will say it's far more insidious than that. For starters. the fat acceptance movement tries to go as far as twisting the evidence and pretending being fat is just as healthy as people who are not fat (blatantly false) Secondly, I don't deny that a lot of fat people get bullied, but pretending it wasn't normal to be fat before the fat acceptance movement is just not true. For starters, at least if you're in the US, UK, or Australia, they've been some of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:32 AM

did you read anything I just said? I didn't say no one has a choice here, but men have far less of a pool to choose from on average, and women far more so. I never mentioned anyone was necessarily a 'victim' either, that's your projection. But like I already said, if MOST women date UP or the same level AT MOST, and there are now MORE women with better education than men, that statistically means MORE women are only looking at a much smaller pool of men on a similar/higher level. It would be irr…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:24 AM

Sure it's less than women and I mentioned before that women do take a lot more time to groom... So I clearly do have a clue. We're naturally not just talking about grooming here though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:21 AM
1

Legit rarely heard any men specifically care if a woman has less money than they do, or their job prospects. Probably wanting around equal socio-economic level, but indirectly and I reckon also still fuelled by women, the subconscious concept that men should be the breadwinners is still very much alive (not saying that's a good thing). I mean there's a reason there have been many papers and articles about even high paid PhD women looking for MORE HIGHLY PAID men, not just the same level or simil…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 12:25 PM
1

Haha, the other commentor was correct, you really are full of strawmen, especially with your snarky point on "eating all the burgers while remaining slim" 😂 Wtf are you talking about in relation to deferring and partaking in conversation? Idk which guys you talk to, but absolutely none of the guys I know have a whole laundry list of random shit like 'confidence but not cockiness, charm but not womanizing, funny but not goofy' etc. They're more likely to be broader, like 'nice, interesting, looks…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:12 PM
0

All I'll say is, beauty is in the eye of the beholder then. Although I agree they are slim and possibly fit too
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:39 AM
1

Hey Siri, what is an insufferable person? You're also kidding yourself if you think most women go to the gym/are expected to go to the gym 😂 I've seen far more chubby women than I have chubby men get into relationships. It's also not a coincidence that most people shown in tbe fat acceptance 'movement' are women...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:36 AM
0

Everyday? You certainly don't have to do it everyday, maybe twice a week, and basing this on me having an extremely white face with hardly any hair, so the few facial hairs I do grow out, become immediately noticeable by like 1mm. So it's about 2 to 3 times a week I have to shave. I already mentioned the what you call 'painting the face part' but you're pretending like men don't have to groom at all either. Sure it's less than women, but we still do, plus you're discounting everything else I've …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:32 AM
1

Lol, like fucking what? 😂 Do men expect you to have more money than them? Do men expect you to be necessarily quite fit? Do men expect you to carry the conversation pretty much all the time, and pretty much always be confident, funny, but not cocky or goofy etc.? No, because that's what men are expected to do, ironically even in this day and age in the West where feminism was supposed to have levelled the playing field more. If anything it's more skewed now against men. In turn, what do women ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:30 AM
1

Brazilian chicks are apparently gold diggers these days though, unless if you're dating someone from a favela or something... As for Thailand and the Philippines, I'm the sort of guy who genuinely sees at least some beautiful women from any culture, but Thailand and the Philippines are HEAVILY overrated in terms of purported looks of women there. Those countries are 100% only said, because old balding men who may have had no luck in the past, can easily get a mail order bride there, those countr…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 06:30 AM
8

women will never get this, as they're constantly claiming they have it 'just as hard' as men in attracting and securing mates. Sure, I'll admit when some of us say "all you have to do is, look pretty and wait" is a bit of an exaggeration, but not far off, and certainly nowhere near as much effort is put in as what even good looking men still have to do (in that case, aside from looks).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 06:27 AM
1

ah fair, true that. The context of where my friend and I usually go is the clubs though, which makes it near impossible for them to publicly humiliate my friend haha. But I agree more with your point on the mental fatigue of going through all that. Because even if you are cool with that, a night out would just become a grind and 'homework' for probably not even very good quality tail necessarily anyway. No real point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 04:26 AM
1

hmm, define 'success' though. I'm confident I've been to at least the average amount of dates as other guys, possibly slightly more. Average amount of hookups, and a fwb briefly (rarer than people think) but never in a long term relationship at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 04:19 AM
1

bring you down in what way? Dignity? You'd feel disrespectful to women? Too prideful? All the above?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 04:17 AM
1

The risk you take as a man approaching is that you might get scorned for misinterpreting. This is literally not the worst case scenario in the slightest though. If you get harshly rejected from a woman, you could get in trouble for sexual harassment, despite respecting her rejection and moving on (harassment, despite what a lot of people think, has to be repetitive i.e being told no, but THEN continuing on) I do agree with the guy you were commenting with before, that you're chucking in a lot of…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:33 AM
2

so much fucking this... The amount of times I've told my friends, usually female friends at that, about all the issues I've had with dating when I got ghosted: like everything appeared smooth and easy going (not to her, obviously); giving me what most would call 'typical' signals; meeting with her multiple times etc. And it doesn't matter what you did or didn't do, I always get the sentiment that it somehow always must be 'our fault' and entirely our fault at that. Like as if we should have a 10…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:23 AM
1

a bit flawed though, because we only know about ~5-10% of the observable universe, and I'm pretty sure even from there, we know a few Earth like planets, but not necessarily if there's any intelligent life on there. Plus that and hominids have been around for about 3.3 mya, and modern humans by about 200,000 years, which is a blip compared to 14.8 billion years of the universe
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:12 AM
1

I'm 2.5 of 3 of those (probably more 'athletic' than muscular territory, but not a bit of fat in sight) and I get signs of attraction, yet I still get the bs and games XD
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:10 AM
1

ads are probably like a bell curve though. If you're a first time/tiny company you NEED to advertise though to get your name out there, and get loyal customers/customers in general to buy your stuff. Whilst big companies should advertise, and as much as possible so even simple parts of their brand can become iconic, including concepts subconsciously related to their brand i.e everyone knows the typography and simple colour scheme of Coca-Cola, and they also associate things like "hot summers" "b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:07 AM
1

tbf I've got some good guy friends that do it. It's not a bad idea 'overall' because they get that one match. Yeah, I know it's like 1% of the time there, with a lot of embarrassment, possible lack of dignity, if done wrong perhaps even legal trouble, but they still get that success eventually, which is why they do it. Still, even for a lot of guys, the question becomes: "is it really worth squeezing a dry lemon for hours on end, just to possibly get one drop?"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:02 AM

because it's a lot easier for women to get sexual partners than men. Not saying it's right, but that's precisely why there's the double standard of a woman who sleeps around = slut, and a man who sleeps around = player. None of this means anyone should be insulted for their lifestyle choice, but I'm definitely not sure why women STILL find this so hard to grasp in terms of how much easier they get it sexually. So the chance of finding a guy who has slept with just say >10 people (not counting pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 11:25 AM

I'll be speaking as a devil's advocate here, as I don't care about people's sexual history, unless if they've slept with like 100+ people perhaps. I think it's because women generally get it far easier on the sexual scene than men do for starters. Secondly, perhaps in the already very one sided sexual marketplace, this only further unbalances the system in favour of so called 'Chad.' It's likely a mixture of social policing, and jealousy. Although it's a different story for guys looking for long…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 11:20 AM
12

they said nothing about being an alpha male? What...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 02:12 AM
1

OP is the one claiming that a woman was interested in him despite her actions showing no indication of such.. Giving him the time of day, talking to him for awhile, showing interest at least in the conversation. Her actions showed exactly that, what are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 11:54 PM
1

-claimed before that women will reapproach a guy they like -immediately then proved herself wrong by saying it'd make her look desperate if she did... I'm not sure if the women dogpiling this post understand they're contradicting themselves, or are doing exactly as OP pointed out: assuming what the other chick thinks
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 11:35 PM
1

bro, so much fucking THIS. I have no idea why all the chicks dogpiling this don't understand this lmao. Either that, or they're purposefully acting disingenuous. That, and women here claiming in terms of courting, that women ever even try and subtly approach/reapproach men they like? Fucking lmao, in what dimension does that happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 11:28 PM
1

"A red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important question" main commenter here, as you admitted yourself, made some whiny remark about dudes assuming women's behaviour on OTHER SUBREDDITS. That's absolutely distracting from the OP's post, are you this dense? Idgaf about apparent 'reddit etiquette' and never said otherwise. No, no i did not. Happy to quote that back to back since you clearly don’t read carefully. Neither do you, as I've also quoted from you, sev…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 11:20 PM

who says I'm offended? One can simply disagree with someone without any offense having been made or given... I'm replying to you, this whole damn thread started off as an irrelevant red herring though, and you're clearly trying to deflect from the fact that it's a red herring thread. I'm pointing it out, because red herrings are dishonest and deflecting, don't play stupid with me. I'll give you one thing, rereading the context OP approached the girl (as usually what happens) that being said, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 09:50 AM

so you made a non sequitur observation not even related to this post, just about the subreddit in general? Right... I'd agree at least that this subreddit is underlying gender war, but at least make it relevant pot for pot here and re-read what I said here: they obviously like you, or at least want to be with you in some sort of capacity... I specifically didn't say it's 100% guaranteed they like you, but they DON'T need a woman or a man to whisk them away from a conversation, if they're clearly…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 08:42 AM

not if she barely had time before being cockblocked, same could go for him... And this is the exact issue that OP posted, that no one seems to be getting the irony of: you'll assume there just 'had to be' a good reason she was whisked away by her friends, if not, then it's the guy's fault for not having balls or something
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 07:13 AM

you're all literally assuming what the chick who is hitting on the guy thinks, like her friend as well. Yet the irony is lost on you all... Yet you think OP is making the ridiculous claim? 😂 It doesn't take mind reading, and is also common sense with anyone with a brain, that if someone is talking to you and willingly sticking around you, they obviously like you, or at least want to be with you in some sort of capacity...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 07:10 AM
1

I'd say they're more able to gatekeep sex, rather than relationships, but no dude is going to get a relationship either if the woman has 0 interest... Whether some women don't ask/are tricked into thinking they're going to get a relationship, when they're being fuckzoned instead, doesn't negate the fact that it's the women that decide when and if there will be a relationship compared to men
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:32 AM

because women are the gatekeepers to relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 05:52 AM
1

"But fair enough that you're not generalising then" I just did you fucking idiot, literally just last comment. Once again, who's proving who that they can't read???
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 01:13 AM
1

I'm the only one? I doubt that. I mean, I'm pretty much the only one engaging with you now anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 01:11 AM
1

Hahaha 😂 look again, I quoted the entire contextual sentence. If YOU had the comprehension skills you'd see that. So perhaps you have single digit IQ? Also, pretty pointless to say that 3 days later 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 01:10 AM
1

good for him then
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 08:23 AM
1

yes, I read the post, well done...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 08:18 AM
1

No, because men don't usually care. If they don't like someone hitting on them, they move off. If that person keeps pursuing them, they tell them to fuck off, possibly knock them out. Ofc that's something women don't do/can't do due partly to being less physically strong on average than men. That doesn't nullify the fact that creepy older women can and do give that treatment to young men. I didn't doubt that it doesn't happen a lot more to young women. But my point was, unless if the person is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 08:17 AM
-1

I'm talking here about when the older woman is hitting on the younger man in this case. Thought that was obvious in context
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 08:13 AM
1

yes, exactly, so still saying my point?...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 08:13 AM
1

Telling women that they're all lying about their experiences and telling them how they really feel and think is literally the revenge fantasy dude. Not really, it's an assumption yes, based possibly on evidence of various kinds or not. I fail to see how this has anything to do with revenge though? do you even know what revenge is or means? Somehow it's always telling them how they actually feel is always painting women as bad, jealous, or dumb. This rodeo has happened on this sub many times. yes…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 08:11 AM

Well, for one thing i'm guessing the dudes being pursued DONT MIND. Right, so not an ethics issue, just women being more sensitive then. It is rarer, I'll give you that, but from experience when it does happen it's just as forward, IF NOT WORSE, considering women's sexual harassment and assault on men is usually ignored, if not taken lightly...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 11:30 PM

Maybe he wouldn't, but people often date or not date others they're otherwise compatible with due to differing life stages, things going on etc. Looks also still matter as well
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 11:28 PM

kind of a weird comment, you could make that warped logic with literally anyone. "oh you two are high school sweethearts of the same age? Cute! What if she were 99 years old right now though, would you still love her???:
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 10:32 PM

how is any of this a fantasy or about revenge? What...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 10:30 PM

how are so called 'MILFs' any different in that respect?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 10:29 PM

If anything, they congratulate them there
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 10:27 PM
0

paradox of declining female happiness pretty much that, and the examples I listed in my comment is part of that evidence. a lack of genuine real life interactions, the loss of third spaces, and individualism. Yes, exactly, which feeds into what I said with OLD and social media
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 10:44 PM
1

Yes I know? I also never said East Asia was part of the west
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 10:41 PM
0

Well, finish with me then, because you're a ranting mess who made a largely non sequitor point in the first fucking place. Please do me a favour and block me then.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 10:26 PM
1

Yes, I lack reading comprehsnion, despite fucking quoting you word for word. Are you dense?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 10:25 PM
1

I didnt, in fact I just wrote about that below... East Asia is absolutely civilised, at least South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan, why are you making it seem like they're separate? Single men are still increasing in the West, just not as much or as fast as East Asia.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 10:22 PM
1

And I just fucking dissected your syntax to demonstrate how you were coming over as generalising, and you keep on ignoring that... But fair enough that you're not generalising then. Not really sure why you think your bf would leave you if x amount of men left their interest on women though
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 10:21 PM
1

Because I don't have guy friends who aren't gay. lol typical. It's no wonder why you generalise, and likely were referring to me as one of the apparent incels you were generalising, because you have no idea what most men are like or how they behave. Only a smaller subset (gay men)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 09:31 AM
0

If men would have abandoned western women then by extension my boyfriend would have abandoned me 'no shit sherlock' no, that is very specifically written like all men, because you're assuming that that would include all men, and naturally including your boyfriend as well therefore... That's why I said. and who are these incels 'right here' huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 09:28 AM
0

And you wouldve perhaps figured out that OP, like most people, likely doesn't literally mean, or at all, 100% of men... Just more men of an inexplicable amount.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 04:31 AM
2

I didnt claim that...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 03:35 AM
2

More opportunities does not always equal more happiness. That's the same fallacious argument as claiming money buys happiness. No one is saying that women having more rights (the same as men now largely) is bad for them or society, but it doesn't make you anymore likely to find a partner than anyone else. Ofc some men and women are genuinely fine being single, they are the minority, at least in the long run.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 03:34 AM
1

It absolutely is not the minority of men... It's at least a large minority. Some 1st world countries have it even worse for example: Japan literally has a demographic crisis that even its own government labelled unironically as an EXTINCTION EVENT. There are enough men and women who just do away with having sex in general in Japan there's a specific term for it: herbivores. There's also a specific term for another broad phenomenon I forgot the name of, but basically NEET males long in their adul…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 03:32 AM
-1

Wtf are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 03:27 AM
1

What makes you think I lack compassion and empathy? What more lame assumptions can you make? I'm just pointing out how lonely and isolated this generation is, that's both from my anecdotal experience of many others I've known in my life, and statistics. This has fucn all to do with compassion and empathy. Considering more and more people, like me, see themselves as irreligious, or at least not practising religious, not everyone at all is wanting a relationship with God... You're writing from an …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 10:37 PM
1

The fact that there's a lot of evidence that men, and I think while to a lesser degree still more than their past cohorts women, who feel lonelier and more isolated than past generations, the fact that this generation is the most sexless, and OLD/social media creates more of a divide, says otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 10:33 PM
1

You serious? Nothing exists in a vacuum for starters. Secondly, you realise women engage in OLD almost as much as men? Have you spoken to many, in particular women in their 20s? They literally have a term for a PHASE where they choose to have loads of sex with no connection (nothing wrong with that) and they call it a 'whore phase' themselves... Sure, I won't lie that plenty of men engage in that behaviour too, but it's absolutely hilarious that you think it's entirely only one gender 😂 why woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 09:07 PM
6

I think the post is from a western point of view tbf, not literally the whole world.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 09:04 PM
0

Sorry, but this is a bunch of weird claptrap word salad, from some random Christian 😂 For starters, it's the religious on average themselves, that are far more anti abortion than the irreligious. Secondly, its the feminists that mainly got their way with making impossible standards, wanting and getting social and economic independence yet expecting the men to support them economically as well as always taking the lead. A high body count doesn't make one a bad person at all, but the double standa…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 09:03 PM
4

which men are you talking to, that claim that?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 05:54 AM
2

they're just as bad as eachother then, or at the very least both have their heads in the clouds... I don't know how it's not self explanatory otherwise, to see how it's not an insult to hear from someone you might love and considering spending THE REST OF YOUR LIFE WITH, that you're only '2nd best,' which may as well be the same as someone saying to you 'you're meh.' Does, "girl, you're not the most attractive person I know" or "yeah, you'll do" or even "I looked at many options that weren't you…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 05:53 AM
1

also this: It’s not even that. It’s just hard to be super involved in a problem we didn’t cause while dealing with our own issues. and yet, feminists are constantly whining at everyone else, pretending only they're the ones who are allowed to have issues, and that it's always about them... Also.. caring is emotional labor. Wow, is it any surprise your ex was a meth head then? With 0 basic compassion like that in any relationship, it's a wonder you were ever in one. Caring is the most baseline th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 05:02 AM
1

read the source analysis I just gave you...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 03:53 AM
1

but tbh, not that you actually deserve my time to give you much in the way of sources, as you gave none, and basically just said 'porn bad' with nothing else to it. Let me educate you, and get YOU to read for once American Psychology Association - Is Pornography Addictive? In a 2013 study, researchers at Brigham Young University and the University of Missouri surveyed heterosexual couples who were married or living together and found that men's use of porn was associated with lower sexual qualit…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 03:52 AM
1

what do you expect? You've given precisely nothing to argue with in the first place... I merely said it's not an epidemic. Literally everything else you just put words in my mouth for, even though I already said the opposite of what you've claimed me to say on this thread... (Like again, I never said I didn't care about the science, or that the science is wrong for about the THIRD time now. How dense are you?) Anyway. Keep reading 👍🏻 Anyway, get better at comprehension, and actually read what I …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 03:39 AM
1

ah right, what happened to all that talk of all this evidence you apparently have, and berating me for apparently only using anecdotes (even though it was just one example, and I never ascribed much weight to the anecdote) whilst using them yourself? (And nothing else) Yes, because meth is totally the same thing as porn... 😂 not all addictions are even the same oh no, some random lady on the internet thinks occasionally looking at porn is bad, whatever shall I do? 😱
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 01:10 AM
1

you can keep telling me to 'keep reading' yet you clearly haven't been bothering to read even the most simple parts of what I've already said... Never said porn doesn't/can't change the brain Never said it isn't a problem for some people In fact, I said the exact opposite... And there are so many comments from others who don't feel that porn has ruined them either, including relationships that might use porn to enhance their sex life, or just as it can be healthily used for: a quick masturbation…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:06 PM
1

I have, and that's how I know it's nowhere near an epidemic as you think it is either...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:36 AM
2

Tbf, I think women complain because (most) porn is directed for men, and by men. A lot of it is cringe and unrealistic too. They're broadly correct about that. That being said, those women are idiotic if they think that's the only porn available. Porn is one of the most abundant things over all on the entire internet, literally. Saying you can't find your brand of porn, assuming it's not insanely niche, or illegal, is just too lazy to do more than a 2 second search
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 12:24 PM
-1

It has been shown to affect the brain, but everything else is literally a slippery slope fallacy 1) literally no source says it can only be detrimental against you, and not just something pleasurable on tbe side 2) no source claims you can't do it in moderation. Almost every time in history since at least prohibition that people have said something is apparently all bad, and needs to be entirely bad, have not only been skewed in their thinking, but it has also massively backfired. For your claim…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 12:21 PM
1

Because they can, lmao. Tbf, helps that I'm a man myself, and that I'm usually on the men's side, but my god we can be absolutely dumb bricks when it comes to emotional manipulation
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 10:30 AM
70

I feel for the older son. It just sounds like more of a case of horn vs halo effect i.e the unfortunate reality that good looking people tend to be treated better, and considered more trustworthy, intelligent, charismatic etc. Ofc it's bullshit, but people are rarely conscious of their mental biases. So because of that, the aunt made that simple assumption that the good looking guy who obviously got more female attention, must've 'just been friendlier/tried harder' as opposed to natural superfic…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 03:05 AM
3

Tbh women complaining about men looking at porn at times in a relationship, even calling it cheating, is not much functionally different than those men who complain about their women using toys either to enhance the sex together, or when the dude is busy. I largely agree with you, a few points though: 1) I agree. I think similar to the logic of why some guys get 'intimidated' by toys, is a similar line of logic to why women don't like it when their boyfriend/husband watches porn though: they fee…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 12:45 AM
1

Yeah, I agree here. Whilst I agree there's probably a fair few, who are also unlikely to message random women, so are hidden, there's no way men at least in their 20s who want a LTR are a silent majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 09:41 AM
0

It shouldn't mean less or no sex either though. For most, sex is an important part of a relationship after all
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 02:48 AM
2

Yeah, I have to agree with you, especially in this climate where men's issues aren't spotlit much at all, if not even downright shat on (something something "oh you're a man, and feel you have issues unique to your gender? Misogynist MRA! Stop being a fragile male!") I also wouldn't directly blame those things you've listed, especially when women and anyone else can pick people for any reason they like. However, due to things like increased narcissistic sentiments, unrealistic expectations of on…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/23 10:55 PM
1

tbf, many learn from that (at least eventually) and no one goes back like "yeah, I like pacing my drinks, but man do I miss puking my guts up." Also, like sex, drinking (and even hooking up) can be done without regretting it. I'm not even conservative, but how millennials/zoomers treat hookups is overrated at least, damaging at worst. Like I've spoken to guys that are successful with hooking up, but are lonely and empty af. Similar with certain women, a lot feel used. At least have a fwb, so the…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 12:19 AM
2

yes, but the (not entirely true generalised premise ofc) OP seems to be specifically talking about women who engage in what they see as a fun activity, but also regret it afterwards. Either that, or yeah, maybe the OP is just generalising and is conservative.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 11:25 PM
1

(I agree with you, I was just asking 'Iamslightlysad' to explain themselves haha)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 11:23 PM
1

But you're answering the wrong question then... The OP seems to be asking the question on your first paragraph i.e why do these women do this, when the result is a double edged sword, often through their heart (according to OP at least) Precisely no one is simply asking why people like freedom in general...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 12:14 AM
7

Then why are a lot of women engaging in hookup culture with men today?...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 12:09 AM

I think it highly depends on context, it's admirable to be a good Samaritan, but plenty of situations look entirely more complicated than they are, or in general. Secondly, there's also a point when you're just heing foolhardy. I think thr bigger issue is, if a dude is in trouble physically from a woman (yes, that's possible) or even other men, I dont think either women or men would step in, and in the former case guys are even so much as labelled as pathetic... Let's at least elevate both issue…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 09:04 AM
2

no, he's right, and I came from a bigger uni myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 02:14 AM
1

I have a guy friend that says what you said, but he is too vigilant and overanalytical of the first few interactions with people. I dont have the heart to tell him this as I think it stems from being screwed over from someone in the past. Better to be overly cautious, than get sucked into it. Oh, I'm not saying that I can't get it wrong, I rarely judge people on first impressions because of that. It does go both ways, you can be too cautious like your friend. Balance is key. That's the issue as …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 03:17 AM
2

I think people like you highly overestimate how much and how well people can hide though... Most aren't genius psychopaths like Francis Underwood, Palpatine, Dexter etc. Either that, or maybe I underestimate myself, because genuinely a lot of the time when people might introduce me to their new gf/bf if they're dodgy, I can smell it pretty quickly. If they're friends, I might warn them about this early on, but they say otherwise. Low and behold, they usually end up breaking up with/complaining a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 01:09 AM
1

Women often choose a really immature guy, while being actually much better themselves. Well, why do they desire them then? Also, that's why I was saying this stuff annoys me. They admit since day 1 that their boyfriend is an immature guy, and yet they dated them, and then proceed to complain about the predictable: that they are, as they discovered themselves since day 1, really immature. No shit, so why date them then, if all you're going to do is complain about who they inherently seem to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 01:06 AM
13

But they do meet these men, have dates and sutuationships and relationships with them. Which means these men are desirable. haha, EXACTLY this! This is why whenever someone complains about their ex(es) for these reasons and more, I'm always thinking "why did you date them for so long then? Why were you attracted to them? You can't be much better, if you were drawn to them..."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 06:34 AM
3

tbh, I just switch off every time I hear the term 'patriarchy.' The suffix of 'archy' assumes a government by men and for men for starters (it's just not true/not that simple in the 1st world west) and it's clear those who use the term mean it in so many different ways. Secondly, his point is that some ugly men want a convenient and easy way to get a girlfriend, and then whine about it when they don't get their way? Yeah, the applies to any ugly person, man or woman. This isn't a conspiracy or s…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 02:40 AM
1

It’s not obvious since not everyone wants to date their friends. Yes, but you're assuming a lot of guys will feel scorned when they get rejected by randos. I'm saying they mostly don't. Those that do chuck fits, are either abusive, desperate, immature, and/or just very young. Why do guys want to ruin friendships? To these guys, it may as well be like saying to a woman "why do you want to ruin a potential relationship?" Sound entitled? Yes, because both sentiments are... Why would you want to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 05:44 AM
1

Yeah, how can you have feelings or interest in someone you don’t know? You can if they're friends, thought the context was obvious enough tbh. The rest of what you're saying is just a repeat of what I already said anyway: If anything, if you have 0 feelings for getting rejected, or don't even care, then you couldn't have had any interest/love for that person originally anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 09:06 AM
1

Im a firm believer that men are unable to love women other than their mothers. So you're claiming NO male has ANY female friends? Because that's exactly like what that quote sounds like.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 09:04 AM
1

ironic, they kind of act exactly like the (male) incels they spend so long whining about, and pretending are somehow a modern existential crisis. Then pretend they're not exactly the same as the men that blame everything on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 09:00 AM
1

Nice projection you've got there.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 04:58 AM
1

You didn't say 'mad' you said 'not happy.' Those are two very different sentiments. You also never said anything about internalised hate either. I'm not legitimising getting angry at someone, or gaining internal hate. All I said is, there's nothing wrong with simply not being happy in getting rejected either. If anything, if you have 0 feelings for getting rejected, or don't even care, then you couldn't have had any interest/love for that person originally anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 04:58 AM
3

Why would anyone be happy about rejection either? That's not hard to understand as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 02:03 PM
0

mic drop Haha, but seriously I entirely agree. That, and despite this age supposedly being a lot more feminist, the men are still largely expected to provide for his woman...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 04:26 AM
2

In both my own experience, and many of my male friends, we are pretty much biologically primed to want to pursue sexual/romantic relationships more than women. It partly explains why men are almost always the pursuers, and the ones who court, and the women not so often. Also, there's the fact that women tend to have tighter friendships that discuss feelings a lot more, and are a lot more affectionate. Plenty of men lack most, if not all of that, so that hole of having no relationship only feels …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 04:23 AM
1

Women: "we're strong and independent, we don't need men! We can construct our own society!" Also women: "AHHH! A ROACH! PLEASE KILL IT FOR ME, AND ILL HELPLESSLY SCREAM!"
/r/MensRights04/11/22 12:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter