TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

garbage_raccoon Archive

View 0 posts and 130 comments by garbage_raccoon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Looking through these comments, it seems there are a lot of us here. In my completely anecdotal and personal experience, the MRM stuff near me tends to be disproportionately homo. Gay men and the MRM are pretty natural bedfellows. It's hard to find people who care about men more than gay dudes do.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 02:47 PM
2

Domestic violence
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:58 PM
1

Yeah idk. America's reeeaaal prudish, and kind of scared of the male body. I can't name a single Hollywood movie with any dick in it at all, big or otherwise.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 07:04 PM
1

Deeply, viscerally disturbed at the spin the author fabricated there
/r/MensRights19/10/24 06:59 PM
2

I guess? Kinda weird, tho. I'd think if you didn't want people seeing your cock, you'd just...not take a job where your cock has to be out. Seems a bit silly to strap on a fake dong to preserve your modesty. But whatever works for 'em
/r/MensRights19/10/24 06:53 PM
1

...for science
/r/MensRights19/10/24 06:49 PM
1

Is "Czech Republic movies" code for porn?
/r/MensRights19/10/24 06:48 PM
30

Shoutout to your mom, dude, for asking these questions unprompted.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 07:35 PM
1

100% agree, and I don't think people really stop to consider how powerful this biological conditioning — the force of evolution — is. Perhaps we like to blame society because society is something we can change, idk. Re: mental load, it's the mental labor of having to remind the men in her life to mop the floor, and gosh why don't they ever just do it? Why do I have to be the one to tell him to do his chores? He's a grown-ass man, this is ridiculous, etc etc.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:36 PM
75

Ok, asking as someone who doesn't really listen to contemporary music or know jack all about either of these people: can someone explain what the problem is? Not trying to be flippant. I just...I don't get it.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 09:43 PM
-4

Thank you, I shall. Though really, it's less of an opinion, and more of an observation: the conceptual framework that says personhood begins with the zygote doesn't have adequate means to differentiate that zygote from any other cell in the body. When we call abortion "murder" even when the victim is a single microscopic cell, it follows that any destruction of human tissue is also murder. It's not epistemologically consistent otherwise, which is the previous gentleman's primary concern.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 09:27 PM
-3

I think monsieur is saying that in the early stages, it's less of a human person, and more of a uterine polyp. Yes, it's human (i.e. made of human cells) and alive (i.e. the cells are performing biological functions), but that doesn't actually mean very much. So is a wart. You can't remove a wart without murdering all those cells.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 07:34 PM
23

This is how it always went in my life. And for the record, it happened in reverse as well. My female roomies and I just tend to have different priorities. Just as they would get annoyed when I didn't prioritize washing dishes or sweeping the floor, I would get annoyed when they'd leave their shoes all over, or leave all the yardwork for me, or forgot about bills. They had to play maid, I had to play landscaper/personal assistant/occasional ATM
/r/MensRights04/08/24 06:50 PM
9

She's actually right this time. Sort of. Psychometric data shows that women have lower disgust thresholds than men do — essentially, men (on average) can put up with more mess before it starts to bother them. This probably has something to do with keeping babies safe. Several things in women's natures evolve from that: their sensitivity to cold, their heightened sense of smell, their increased attunement to infant cries, etc. Where she fails is attributing it to society. It's much older than tha…
/r/MensRights04/08/24 06:32 PM
20

My roommate (a woman) says this all the time. "If we had women in charge, there wouldn't be any wars. I mean, how could a mother start a war and send people's children to die?" So, men have no affection for their children, no paternal drive to protect them, and no empathy for others. Gotcha. I mentioned that, historically, queens tended to be much more aggressive than kings, so it may end up the exact opposite of what she hopes — a more bloody, violent era. She just says "I don't think so. As a …
/r/MensRights03/08/24 06:01 PM
4

I think approaching those women was a fine thing to do. But I'm with you that we should absolutely start giving each other flowers. Why not?
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:25 AM
3

The first two images are honestly so wholesome and sweet.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:22 AM
7

That's why I try to be a huge D-bag all the time: it's more energy-efficient
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:20 AM
8

Honestly, very sad. To have your relationships with half of humanity be so profoundly impaired is just awful...
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:17 AM
7

Absolutely. It's all I ever hear about: the inconvenience of having to momentarily put the feelings of others before your own. I always felt good about helping people, personally. But I'm just an emotionally stunted XY, so what do I know?
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:11 AM
10

Bro, I had legitimately no idea this was a psychology term until you told me. I've only ever heard it in the feminist context — "I'm the one who has to write all the birthday cards," or "I had to listen to my husband complain to me about his day like I'm some sort of therapist," or "my little brother keeps asking me for relationship advice, ugh." Just looked it up. Apparently the woman who coined the term to talk about the effects of forced agreeableness in the workplace is none too happy it's b…
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:06 AM
9

Right? But to a lot of these people, he may as well have put a gun to her head
/r/MensRights02/08/24 09:10 PM
2

This. Asking when this came to be? Out calendars don't go back that far.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 07:51 PM
3

Whaaat? Say it ain't so!
/r/MensRights02/08/24 07:48 PM
23

Facts. It'd be hard to grow up with a mother like this and not internalize the idea that women are self-centered A-holes
/r/MensRights02/08/24 07:45 PM
47

I swear, "emotional labor" is code for "not being a raving narcissist for at least 10 seconds." These people get so booty-bothered when they're expected to at least pretend to care about others. Things people have put forward as examples of emotional labor: wishing someone a happy birthday, asking about someone's day, cheering up your friends/family when they're sad, giving someone flowers you got for free, etc. etc. I'm sorry, no. That's not a female burden. That's called being a good friend. W…
/r/MensRights02/08/24 07:43 PM
26

given free flowers, picked out and paid for by someone else only expectation is that they give them to a man of their choice, and spend five seconds caring about another human being "UGH, THE LABORRRRR THO"
/r/MensRights02/08/24 07:30 PM
13

Then they'd better tell me before my penis and I make an appointment
/r/MensRights02/08/24 04:06 AM
-3

What about people with a CAH, or de la Chapelle syndrome? They've got XX chromosomes. How about XX people with a hormonal imbalance, are they allowed? I mean, it gives them an unfair advantage, no? All of these sports associations disagree and come to different rulings on precisely these things because no one can concretely define what constitutes "woman enough". And as our medical knowledge advances, it's only gonna get messier. Unfortunately, the XY=man XX=woman model isn't adequate to actuall…
/r/MensRights02/08/24 02:26 AM
0

Sure enough for government work. I mean, I have no more direct knowledge about this than you do. She may well have Swyer syndrome or something — maybe the guy who leaked her confidential medical information, and that one Russian news source that published it, are telling the truth. I wouldn't put money on it, but it's possible. Either way, it doesn't make her a dude.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 02:05 AM
3

I feel bad for her. Not only is everyone running around invalidating her successes and saying she has a d*ck, but they're also making her out to be some sort of cheat because she has a hormone imbalance. "It's not fair, because her body is stronger and more muscular!" Um, what? It's a physical competition. Those are never fair. Someone will always be stronger/faster/tougher/whatever. The whole point of the competition is to tease out who that is. I fail to see the issue :/
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:37 AM
-3

weird takes about dudes punching chicks She's a woman, tho. The only Y chromosome anywhere in that article is an offhand mention that Elon Musk and Piers Morgan have thoughts about this whole thing.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:24 AM
4

I think you're right on the money. Literally.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 07:56 PM
5

Right? Doesn't seem very equality-minded to me... I haven't checked the numbers myself, but I heard tell that the gender gap now is worse than it was in 1970, when all these countermeasures were taken to boost women in education. But since it's now men who are disaffected, no one wants to fix it. Something something patriarchy
/r/MensRights01/08/24 07:55 PM
3

Exactly. It legit doesn't matter what anyone actually says or does, it is always bad and wrong and evil and oppressive.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 02:12 PM
14

Also: if it's all about equality, why would they feel threatened by other movements fighting for equality as well? We're all working toward the same goal, right? That tells me it's more a "women's advocacy" thing than an "equality" thing. Which is fine, but let's call a spade a spade, and leave space for the people who are actually fighting to make the world more fair, not just more good for women.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 02:04 PM
11

I'd like to know about times where men have used a means of betterment that feminists have built, and feminists were happy about it. They tend to freak out and try to shut the whole thing down instead. That, to me, is pretty damning. I can't remember if it was Sweden or Norway, but when male students started leveraging feminist affirmative action policies in schools to get into heavily female-dominated fields, they shut the whole program down, saying something about the program "being made to he…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 01:56 PM
1

THANK YOU! I could not for the life of me remember that clown's name
/r/MensRights01/08/24 04:03 AM
1

Oh, for sure! So commonly believed, it may as well be true 😅
/r/MensRights01/08/24 01:15 AM
5

Good point. In this particular case, however, they are wrong. This phrase has nothing to do with DV, and never did. I can't say definitively 100% for sure what it means, but as a linguist, I'd bet my left nut it actually comes from measurement — i.e. the width of your thumb is about an inch, so a "rule of thumb" came to mean "a simple but inexact workaround." But your point still stands, and is excellent. Getting bogged down in etymology tends to birth a lot of historian's fallacies, and is gene…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 01:07 AM
1

Mysteries of the universe, man...
/r/MensRights01/08/24 12:54 AM
2

Facts. Studies have been done, but they're devilishly hard to get your hands on. When I used to write about this topic, I quoted 10%, using an average of the results of smaller studies I had read. But this was years ago. If there's been a recent study or a metaänalysis, I haven't seen it...
/r/MensRights31/07/24 09:53 PM
46

Yuuuup. That whole interpretation comes from the gut feeling ONE 17th century judge had about the origin of the term. Not backed up by any evidence whatsoever. It almost certainly comes from the practice of using the width of your thumb as a rough measure for an inch. "Rule" being the old word for "measure" (think: "ruler"). Hence, it's meaning: "a rough strategy that'll generally get the job done, but isn't exact." Doesn't make much sense, linguistically, if the original phrase referred to beat…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:22 PM
1

I'm probably going to regret asking this, but... How do you get pregnant from a dead guy? Erection might be possible, but surely ejaculation isn't, right?
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:11 PM
1

Definitely will not be looking that up. This conversation alone is nauseating enough, I'll take your word for it
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:08 PM
4

Spit out my tea at "useless scrotums" Gonna have to steal that one
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:06 PM
3

Excellent point. I don't mind the idea of considering the costs of pregnancy and childbirth this way, but I'm not a fan of this nebulous, undefined cost being used to argue against equity in support. If we can calculate down to the cent what a father's financial interest should be, surely we can calculate the costs of childbirth, divide that by 2, and incorporate that into our support calculations, rather than assuming the mother's cost is infinity, and the father's contribution is zero.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 07:51 PM
1

I think the fact that you aren't in agreement should be cause enough. Like when your parents disagree on a rule when you're a child, you follow whichever is strictest. Putting aside the ethical issues with circumcision — others here have addressed those already — looking at the issue purely pragmatically: he wants it, you don't. The strictest rule would be to abstain from any permanent body alterations, as you two don't agree on what's best for your son. Best to err on the side of caution.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 07:39 PM
2

I'm with this guy. It sucks, but that's how we evolved. There's no way we can really equalize that without doing something heinous to half the planet. Best to just find ways to work around it.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 07:45 PM
1

I'm sorry you're feeling that way. I know this isn't really helpful to hear, but it's normal to feel that way at your age, and it will get better. Hell, I didn't start feeling like I was worth the oxygen I breathe until I moved away to college. Don't be too hard on yourself, and give it some time. (And thank you for being here, and taking an interest in men's issues. We can be a bit jaded, and sometimes kinda cranky, but having a young woman like yourself take the time to look into what we're sa…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 07:25 PM
11

Hopefully there are enough rich try-hards to go around...
/r/MensRights21/07/24 05:37 PM
2

Idk, American elections are kinda just performative anyway. Two of the five administrations I've lived through lost the popular vote, but were elected anyway. I think the voting habits of regular people has very little to do with who becomes commander in chief. I bet if we scrapped the system that has overriden the popularly elected Democrat candidate, and instead handed the presidency to a Republican whom most of the country voted against — twice — they'd be more active at the ballot box.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 05:26 PM
5

Hey now, let's not go pretending the American people chose these clowns. The nominees are chosen by the parties — a corporate board of political elites — not the people. They're elected by the electoral college — 538 people chosen by, guess who, the parties to vote on our behalf. They're not the best of the US, nor the choice of the people. They're the ones whom those party board members liked best, who the party thinks will best serve its needs, American people be damned. We got no say in this …
/r/MensRights21/07/24 05:08 PM
3

Yeah man, you'll be alright. Promise. Just get to a doctor, take a round of antibiotics, and Bob's your uncle. Your dong will be good as new in no time ✨ Chlamydia is super common, easily curable, and nothing to stress too much over.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 04:44 PM
6

I can understand not being able to change a tire, but pumping gas...? C'mon now, you're not four.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 03:41 AM
3

If you help her but didn't want to, you're a gay bear
/r/MensRights18/07/24 12:57 AM
20

2004 never ended, I guess
/r/MensRights18/07/24 12:48 AM
5

Damn, really? That's some serious courage
/r/MensRights18/07/24 12:47 AM
27

A random woman wouldn't help you move a couch...
/r/MensRights18/07/24 12:46 AM
10

This exactly. This isn't an action movie — it's the bleeding, crying, real world. Here, grievous injury or death is always a serious possibility. I wouldn't risk it for my own shit, much less some random stranger's. Just give them what they want and go.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 12:44 AM
22

Nah, we're good
/r/MensRights18/07/24 12:37 AM
3

That second-to-last one is some literal psychosis. So... you're saying the male hivemind actively punishes women who step out of line by allowing violence to be done to them. That it's a dark conspiracy for all of us to leverage the violent, scary behaviors of the criminal men to terrorize all women into submission while still maintaining a façade of decency. Not my first time hearing this argument. This is exactly why we need to fund mental health services...
/r/MensRights18/07/24 12:32 AM
1

Oh yeah, this is a huge problem. The birthrates in developing countries are also declining. When there aren't sufficient young immigrants to replace those not being born in developed nations, demographics in these areas will undergo a sudden and dramatic shift towards older populations. Each year, the number of people dependent on support from others or the state will increase, while the pool of working-age individuals shrinks. Ultimately, there won't be enough young people to sustain the elderl…
/r/MensRights17/07/24 03:36 AM
2

Personally? By everyone having as close to a fair shake as we can manage. I think, in a perfect world, your sex should be largely irrelevant to your station and how you're treated.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 08:28 AM
2

Yeah, I was kinda hoping we could just be equals...
/r/MensRights13/07/24 03:36 PM
6

Women are considered inferior for acting like men (e.g. being aggressive and pushy, sleeping around), therefore men are considered inferior. "Okay, yeah but just because men aren't shamed for it doesn't mean they aren't seen as less than. As a matter of fact, it only proves that men are seen as so inferior that it's expected for them to be immoral and badly behaved, hence the lack of shame."
/r/MensRights11/07/24 08:45 PM
1

I see where you're coming from, but I'm afraid I have to disagree. I'm not an anthropologist, but the Wodaabe men seem to fulfill roles similar to those in other pastoralist societies: they head the family, manage the herd, and lead migrations. Their grooming and courtship rituals are a bit different, sure, but I would call that a cultural variation rather than a fundamental shift in gender roles. As for tribalism, if it's a societal construct, why does it exist everywhere, in every society? The…
/r/MensRights11/07/24 03:04 PM
1

I think he's got a point. Behavior evolves incredibly slowly. Compared to that, society has been here for basically zero time. We're not built for the school yard, the office, the internet — we're built for the cave, the savannah, (maaaaybe) the grass hut. Tribalism, laziness, our obsession with fat and sugar — all very useful behaviors in the Stone Age — are actively a problem for people today. Now, those instincts lock us into unnecessary conflict with our neighbors, weaken our bodies, and mak…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:36 PM
3

This is the realest thing I've read all day.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 03:53 PM
3

We've all been there, buddy
/r/MensRights09/07/24 03:07 PM
27

If your definition of rape is "sexual intercourse without consent," then yeah, absolutely. Data out of the US suggests gender parity in sexual victimization, and it's not hard to imagine that male victims could just be harder to count. Men are less likely to discuss their victimization. And in surveys, more women admit to committing rape than men do. While I tend to assume men and women are raped in equal numbers, it's entirely possible that rape of males is more common.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 06:51 AM
7

Completely understandable. You were put in a tough spot, and made a tough decision as best as you could. I just wish it had worked out differently. Just because "man big, girl smol, girl go boo hoo" doesn't mean the rules of evidence, burden of proof, and presumption of innocence just cease to exist. They had nothing but the testimony of the complainant and her friend, which (if I'm understanding correctly) was directly contradicted by other witness testimony. I'm flabbergasted that your lawyer …
/r/MensRights09/07/24 06:02 AM
6

The whole "it implies women are unable to [insert very easy thing]" thing is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Never once have I held a door open for a woman and thought: "Thank god I was here, or this poor, mentally deficient female would've been clawing at the door frame like a goddamn cat for the next three hours." They seriously taught you this in school? My take on chivalry: do for one as you would do for all. Open doors for people (not just women) because it's polite, not b…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 05:16 AM
20

First, I'm so sorry that happened to you. That's a horrible situation, start to finish, and ot broke my heart to read it. Second, I'm appalled your lawyers advised you to plead out on something you didn't do. Not only making you take the fall for some random jackoff and his cunty girlfriend — leaving them consequence-free, out free in society, and able to keep attacking people at will — but also leaving you with an indelible mark on your record. Now you can't vote, own a firearm, hold 90% of job…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 04:51 AM
1

I see. Might well be doable if you fix the big stuff. Or rent to a friend on the cheap. Anyway, just one possibility — there are other ways to get yourself where you want to be
/r/MensRights08/07/24 04:01 PM
1

Serious question: would it really double the classes? If the number of students didn't increase, wouldn't the number of classes be the same? The women would be moved out of the men's classes, and the men out of the women's classes, leaving the number unchanged.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 07:25 PM
16

Not sure if you have more info on this case the we do, but that article never said they consented, and didn't list their ages.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:44 AM
-3

Legit. People are embarrassing.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:13 AM
2

I suppose it's similar. Although "you don't want to have sex with me, therefore you must be a lesbian" is at least a bit more understandable than "you disagree with me politically, therefore you must be gay." I personally always just assumed girls weren't into me because I'm ugly, tho, so can't really speak to the behavior you're describing.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:10 AM
11

You've really been through the wringer. I'm sorry. You did the right thing, from start to finish. Don't feel that you didn't, just because of what happened. She just manages to get away with doing the wrong thing, that's all. It sucks, but sometimes you can make every right move and still lose. I'm sure there are still ways for you to enlist. Perhaps renting out your place could cover the support payments and satisfy the recruitment officers. Perhaps worth looking into. Don't get too down. You c…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 01:52 AM
1

First of all, I'm sorry you're going through a difficult custody case. I know how exhausting and disheartening that can be. I wish you the best of luck. While I can't recommend resources without knowing what jurisdiction you're in, there are likely some available. Try looking for local father's advocacy groups. They will be better able to direct you. Your lawyer should also be able to advise you. They tend to have a roster of experts they use again and again. I'd ask him if that sort of testimon…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 01:33 AM
68

As a homo, gotta say: it does give me immense satisfaction just shake that shit off.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 01:11 AM
3

Cassie is a treasure. And such a sweet and earnest person. It blows my mind how people can get so nasty with her...
/r/MensRights06/07/24 01:05 AM
4

Yuuuup. Got that all the time when I was getting abused as a child. 10 year-old me used to get the whole "now you know how it feels to be a woman" thing from my own mother. I used to think: "Why is this a zero-sum game? Isn't there enough empathy to go around?" Sorry to say, the answer seems to be no.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:58 AM
8

That's...honestly a brilliant reply. Never thought about it that way. Yeah, if it's the pregnancy aspect is really what makes it so bad, then I guess post-menopausal women don't matter either. Or barren women. Or women with their tubes tied. Having a whole checklist of all the types of people for whom rape isn't as bad based on their fertility seems pretty complicated. I propose a much easier alternative: we just treat it like a big deal for everyone.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:50 AM
4

Holy shit, that's horrible! I'm so sorry you went through that, man. I hope you've been able to heal
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:41 AM
2

It would appear men are predisposed to providing for women. Elected men are no different. Psychometric data suggests (despite feminism's claims to the contrary) men don't have an innate in-group preference. We don't "look out for our own" the same way women do. In fact, we tend to exhibit an out-group preference, placing a higher value on women and their needs. This tendency is older than our species, and deeply ingrained. That's why making progress in men's rights is so hard. It's like fighting…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:37 AM
29

Haven't gotten that one yet, personally. Not surprised, though. They're not used to their feminine powers not working. So, if that happens, the dude must be gay, right? That's the only logical explanation...
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:21 AM
30

"Weep, you girls! My penis has given you up. It now penetrates men's behinds." -graffiti from Pompeii People been getting their jollies with the bros for millenia
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:16 AM
0

It depends on what you mean by "patriarchy." In the strictest sense, patriarchy refers to family dynamics — where the father is head of the household, and descent is traced through the paternal line. In this sense, we live in a Patriarchy Lite™. We have the patrilineal descent thing, but not the rule of the father thing. If you mean feminism's definition of patriarchy — where men hold all the power and systematically exclude women — I personally haven't seen any compelling evidence. I've made an…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:10 AM
5

Two things that I find people generally don't think about: 1) Education is stacked against men and boys in basically every way conceivable. Schools exclusively use teaching methods better suited to girls, the number of male teachers continues to shrink, there are fewer resources available to male students, and the environment is more hostile every year. As a result, boys have fallen behind girls in basically every metric of educational success, and this gap is growing every year. If memory serve…
/r/MensRights04/07/24 01:44 AM
2

I'm cackling over "practicing unprotected coitus" xD What a turn of phrase
/r/MensRights02/07/24 11:24 PM
2

I'm with you. The idea of a someone being able to force a woman to have an abortion against her wishes is jacked up. Abortions aren't always a quick an easy thing. They're often painful, invasive, and traumatic. But even setting that aside, giving someone unilateral authority to dictate what happens in another person's body is, to my mind, pretty evil. I don't want men to be able to decide a woman has to have an abortion any more than I want a woman to be able to decide a man has to have a vasec…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 11:17 PM
1

That's hilarious xD Same — I taught one roommate (55F) how to make scrambled eggs, roasted vegetables, and meatballs. All pretty low on the cooking tech tree. Before that, she ate almost exclusively TV dinners. Now she's cooking up a storm, making her own recipes and shit. I still chuckle at how she used to go around like "This is my roommate — he makes good scrambled eggs!" (Also, no one ever mentions the dishes!! 100% accurate. Scrubbing pots and pans is apparently a lost art)
/r/MensRights02/07/24 09:26 PM
1

I cook all the time. Just made the roomies steak and herb-roasted potatoes last night. My father thought it was a vital life skill, and taught me early. He spent a lot of time in the kitchen. May have had something to do with the fact that my mother, though willing, was a terrible cook 😅 So yeah, learned to cook. One of many "feminine" skills he imparted, along with cleaning house and repairing clothing. As a 29 year-old bachelor, it's stood me in good stead
/r/MensRights02/07/24 09:12 PM
4

Huh. Haven't encountered any men like that, personally. I do know a couple of guys whose wives left them when they got cancer/MS, though. Does that count?
/r/MensRights02/07/24 09:02 PM
2

I get what you're saying. I just think it's deeper than culture. I'd be willing to bet that even if 100% of them were men, we'd still have the same problem. Gotta love that women-are-wonderful effect 😮‍💨
/r/MensRights02/07/24 03:49 AM
26

I just can't get over the "silent treatment" bit. The heinous crime of doing...literally nothing. But I guess they did make first-degree rudeness a real legal concept. Guess that's par for the course.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 02:45 AM
1

Signed. Kicked in a little dough, too. Good luck.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 02:33 AM
65

I had never heard the term "coercive control" before. Since the penalty for it is up to seven years in prison, I thought it deserved a little research. Luckily, the NSW government has a handy guide. Here are some of the examples they provided: "belittling someone or making jokes at their expense to harm their self-esteem and dignity" "using tactics that pressure or punish the other person, for example by withholding affection, giving the ‘silent treatment’ or ignoring them" "providing a small al…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 02:21 AM
16

"There was never much hope. Just a fool's hope." It's a sorry state of affairs, it really is. But I think the issue is deeper than the sex of the person signing the orders. Male magistrates are just as chivalrous as anyone else, and also rule against men a disproportionate amount. If we want to be treated fairly, we need to change the laws they make their rulings by. (Not an Australian, but I did work in family law here in the US, and my experience has been that male judges aren't any less susce…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 01:56 AM
16

Girl had some issues 😐
/r/MensRights02/07/24 01:37 AM
23

Probably because they want us dead. Nah, I get what you mean. My take on it is that it's easier to ignore the contributions of others these days. 300 years ago, if you needed a nail, you had to actually talk to the blacksmith. If you needed flour, you had to talk to the miller. Etc. etc. Nowadays, your roads are paved without you knowing. Chances are you didn't see your house being built. Your phone is manufactured by some faceless corporation, and delivered to your door by some guy you don't kn…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 01:36 AM
0

I wholeheartedly support this petition, but I'm not Indian. Can I sign anyway?
/r/MensRights02/07/24 01:16 AM
11

No, I don't think a man should have a say in whether a woman becomes a mother. It's her body — she's the one who has to deal with the risks and consequences involved with pregnancy/childbirth — so she should be the sole decider on whether she's willing to accept said risks/consequences and carry a child to term. That said, I also don't think a woman should be able to have a say in whether a man becomes a father, either. Consenting to sex ≠ consenting to parenthood. If she wants to keep the child…
/r/MensRights01/07/24 11:53 PM
45

That's genius. Gonna start using that for everything. "Women aren't allowed bodily autonomy, you say? So? That's just how it is." "Children are being forced into slave labor? And I should care about this...why? I don't see you out there assassinating sweat shop owners." "Oh, the ocean is full of plastic? Well, what do I look like, a bluefin tuna? Stop bothering me with useless things that have nothing to do with me." Just kidding, I'm not that much of a dick. Seriously though, that woman's lack …
/r/MensRights01/07/24 09:07 PM
15

This is excellent! Well, I mean, deeply sad and disgraceful. But thank you for sharing this info and saying what needs to be said. I really wish the person on page 8 wouldn't have framed that boy being returned to his abusive father as "contributing to him becoming a future perpetrator." Uhm....you're doing the thing. Kind of side-stepping the whole "sending him to certain injury and potential death" thing by not looking at the effects on him, and instead focusing on how he could perhaps potenti…
/r/MensRights01/07/24 08:53 PM
1

Decided to make a gender-flipped version, going through each point, to highlight the duality of these issues. Took several hours to write, aaaaaand Reddit's not letting me post it 😮‍💨
/r/MensRights01/07/24 08:39 PM
1

Yup. Happens all the time. Confronting the fact that you might be a sexist prick is uncomfortable. If society offered you a "get out of bigotry free" card, why wouldn't you use it? I've known many a woman in my time on this miserable planet, and I can count on one hand the number who freely, without being impelled, actually take the time to think about whether what they're saying is messed up. (Present company excluded — I'm talking irl) A friend of mine (28F) recently told me about how a group …
/r/MensRights01/07/24 07:50 PM
2

I'm here for it. Men and women both have serious mental health issues that need to be addressed, and while there is a lot of overlap, there's enough difference to make separate events worthwhile, imo. And I think it'd be prudent to equalize the time spent discussing both. If I were king of the world, it'd be one mental health month. Week 1 could be women's health, week 2 men's, and weeks 3 and 4 could be used to discuss other groups (children, minorities, etc.). Having them be subdivisions of on…
/r/MensRights01/07/24 07:30 PM
13

These people are blind in one eye. They think that because society doesn't have the same expectations of men, it must not have any expectations of men. Case in point: "if I choose not to have children, my masculinity won't be called into question." Perhaps, but if you choose to be a stay-at-home dad, it sure will be. Gender roles are still being enforced; it's just a matter of what those roles are. It's like if I said: "As a woman, you won't be expected to be a handyman or a laborer. You will ne…
/r/MensRights30/06/24 02:19 AM
4

First off, I'm sorry you went through all that, man. That's awful... I'm sure there are lots of women who do take men's mental health into account, but I haven't found that to be the typical way of things. My own theory on this is that it has to do with men's role throughout history as human shields and the appropriate targets of aggression, which necessitates a certain degree of detachment — a willingness to allow us to be harmed. A shield that cries is of no use to anyone. Whatever the cause, …
/r/MensRights29/06/24 04:27 AM
1

That kind of open discrimination is going to be harder to find, bc it's really fucking stupid. I mean, they went out of business because of it. While there are a handful of really cut-and-dry things like that (DV shelters leaps to mind), 95% of anti-male discrimination is a bit more covert than that. That said, there's still plenty of stuff you can use for your paper. It just won't be as in-your-face as charging anyone with a penis more for a cup of coffee. Plenty of discrimination to discuss, t…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:43 PM
2

Oh, she's lucky if she gets a call on Christmas...
/r/MensRights06/05/24 03:46 AM
1

My journey was a bit unusual. I was a staunch feminist into young adulthood, just as my mother raised me to be. That is, until I got to college. For English 102, we had to write a big-ass research paper on any topic. I decided to pick something easy to argue: the wage gap. A simple fact to prove and condemn, right? But the more I researched, the more factors I equalized, the smaller that gap became. I was stunned. There must be some mistake. But the math was solid. I took that revelation to my m…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 12:15 AM
12

Oof. This guy needs some therapy...
/r/MensRights05/05/24 11:05 PM
2

You're quite right. And women like Julia Maesa do exist alongside women like Catherine the Great, Wu Zetian, or Elizabeth I — those with clear, overt power. I'm just saying, people often point to the relative scarcity of Catherine the Great-esque figures as evidence that women had basically no power in history, and that's a mistake. Power doesn't have to be seen to be felt.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 05:21 PM
1

I read "male violence against women is [...] not sensationalised enough" and legit choked on my tea. Well, I for one would like to welcome our visitors from Earth 3
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:42 PM
1

Agreed, although I don't think they'd think of it as virtue signaling. That'd require empathy toward men and boys to be seen as a virtue.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 01:09 AM
1

Wait, were we supposed to answer seriously? Shit, I completely misunderstood the assignment
/r/MensRights05/05/24 12:42 AM
1

Fair enough. The 5-10 claim is false, and I assume, just hyperbole. There are way more pedos than that, unfortunately. Now, I'm not looking for a debate, but I did want to offer a caution: often times the "bullshit" of today are the facts of tomorrow. We used to think men committed 99% of DV — now we know it's roughly equal. We used to think men and boys were a tiiiiny percentage of SA victims — now we know they're almost half. The history of the MRM is riddled with the corpses of old ideas that…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 12:22 AM
1

I think people are mad because the way your post is worded kinda makes it seem like you're doing the whole "ᴜᴍ, ᴀᴄᴛᴜᴀʟʟʏ, ᴍᴇɴ ᴀʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ʀᴀᴘɪꜱᴛꜱ" thing. I know that's not what you meant, but people get extra touchy around the topic of childhood SA. I don't think it's a resistance to facts and figures, but rather a "wrong place, wrong time" kind of situation.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:35 PM
3

The bear, obviously. Bears are just wild animals, completely incapable of the psychopathic levels of cruelty women are. Team bear, all the way (assuming, of course, that it's not a girl bear)
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:06 PM
1

Depends: is the bear male?
/r/MensRights04/05/24 09:57 PM
1

THANK YOU If someone asked "would you rather be stuck in a room with a woman or a rattlesnake," there wouldn't be 40 million people discussing the pros and cons, and "well rattlesnakes are more predictable" and "maybe if women weren't such monsters" etc etc. That shit would've been nuked from orbit the second OP pressed post.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 09:55 PM
29

I'm so sorry you went through that. There's nothing more painful than having your suffering either ignored or used against you like that. Especially by those closest to you. It can honestly feel like like a whole new violation. I'm right there with you. When I was 10, I was repeatedly molested by a 20 year-old roommate. On one such occasion, my older sister came home early, and walked in while it was happening. She looked us both over, said "you two are gross," and walked out of the house, leavi…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 07:06 PM
12

Yeah dude, please don't be a Daniel Zamora. Big ew.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 06:31 PM
50

Literally makes me sick to my stomach. It's felony child abuse, but they always write about it like some trashy gossip column. Every time I see a headline like "Young love: teacher pregnant after illicit affair with 6th grade student," I want to launch myself into the sun.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 06:27 PM
2

You make a good point. That's definitely a large part of the issue. That said, I do think we tend to ignore the tremendous power women wielded throughout history, just because it wasn't loud and in-your-face. Just one example to illustrate my point: Julia Maesa (3rd century, Rome) saved the Severan Dynasty from collapse, and instigated not one but two successful coups. She decided who would be emperor, who the emperor chose as caesar, and much of what they would and wouldn't do. But because proc…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 06:08 PM
10

When shit hits the fan, we're reminded (often at gunpoint) that our individual personhood is entirely conditional. Your liberty, safety, autonomy, and rights exist only when your sacrifice isn't necessary. To my mind, this is the heart of male objectification; these men aren't people, they're weapons. To quote Karen Straughan: "If I had to be an object, I'd rather be a sexual one or someone's prized possession than a tool that can be smashed to pieces."
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter