~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | TBP cannot rely on content in an argument because they cannot support content other than ad hominem. Therefore their arguments are void.I understand your concern, but I just looked back at the post. Your quote was introduced in a way to illustrate how TRP supposedly dismisses rape. Even if we completely delete your quoted text, the other posts speak for themselves and have the sentiment of your post implicit in content of the quoted text. It stands to reason that if someone does not believe the legal definition of rape is valid, they believe a lot of rapes are not rapes. This would validate the position your quote is supposed to… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/13 01:59 AM |
| 8 | TBP cannot rely on content in an argument because they cannot support content other than ad hominem. Therefore their arguments are void.The argument is that TRP advocates rape apologia. This is evidenced by its endorsed contributors, who continue to be endorsed even after their comments, making comments that condone, if not promote, rape. This claim needs no facts outside of quotes from endorsed contributors proving the claim. It does everything it claims it does. When you pay someone to to contribute to your community, you are saying they are qualified to speak on your behalf. The fact that these contributors were not stripped … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/13 01:33 AM |
| 3 | TBP cannot rely on content in an argument because they cannot support content other than ad hominem. Therefore their arguments are void.Stating that a conclusion might accidentally be right is irrelevant. Logically, we dismiss arguments that are based on invalid principles. The conclusion does not follow or isn't more likely to follow based on the premises presented. If someone's argument is invalid, their position is invalid. Therefore, what he says holds no weight as there's no basis for it. If you want to try and posit that every invalid argument MIGHT be right, then go ahead, but it's a waste of everyone's time. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/13 01:08 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter