TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gauts2103 Archive

View 3 posts and 79 comments by gauts2103 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah I learnt this lesson after fumbling at least 3 amazing women over the last 4 months because I kept trying to have good texting flow before I asked them out. Haven’t spoken to anyone since though
/r/seduction12/03/26 06:12 PM
1

Same I get early replies and have one-ish good conversation but it tends to die out
/r/seduction12/03/26 03:03 PM
–

Me when I see the OP
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 11:11 PM
–

I think it should be the exact opposite, because anyone interacting with the opposite gender consistently in order to get a relationship/sex/romance/whatever will have biases and prejudices based on their own experience. Only those who don’t try and have no incentive (asexual people) can probably have the most unbiased observations on the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 03:29 AM
1

Watching porn together for fun and watching it solo to scratch an itch is not the same lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 12:59 PM
1

lol ok. You literally said that size or whatever doesn’t say anything about a person. But you brought it up because “from what I’m saying”; “you can tell I’m small”. Who’s not making sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 06:18 AM
1

Ok. The weird part is how it wasn’t supposed to “matter”, in your own logic, but by my words you can tell I’m small. Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 06:15 AM
1

Ahahaha this is so funny. Like I said you can’t engage at all with what I’m trying to say, so suddenly I’m small lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 06:12 AM
1

Of course, that’s not a surprise. Why will a dehumaniser understand why others feel dehumanised? If good = ego boost and bad = ego bruised then it’s no wonder you think the way you do. “If the men I’m with get an ego boost from this, what I’m doing must be right”. You’re unable to treat people as people, and see them only as means for sexuality. Which is why humanity feels like a foreign language to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 06:10 AM
1

If your “proper care” requires “temporary modular upgrade” I’m sorry it’s dehumanisation. What is sad to see that sexuality has become so whimsical that it’s ok to dehumanise people to get off, whether it’s a man or a woman. And if resisting dehumanisation means “bruised ego” then sure. You’ve taken sexuality to such an extent that you’re willing to conduct “modular humanity” - you separate individual features from the person itself, and then want to upgrade those features temporarily for your p…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 06:06 AM
1

You don’t see the men as humans. Maybe start there.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:58 AM
1

I mean? I love how this conversation jumps from Use of toys Reality of women My personal insecurities (if any) According to your own words “if you mind that the centre of the act is no longer you/human penis and instead a plastic dildo, you are insecure, and you should not have sex”. What this means interpersonally - accept dehumanisation or don’t have sex. Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:56 AM
1

If you hold these views, fair. I can see why you say what you say, as long as it is reciprocated in the same way. But I personally can’t ask anyone to put on padding or whatever, because for my mind it would seem like admitting I don’t find them attractive at all. So if someone tells me they would like a massive dildo or something, they don’t find me attractive at all. It’s that simple for me. People like you should find people like you. People like me should find people like me. OP is sitting s…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:50 AM
1

It’s fun how suddenly you go from a very specific discussion “boo hoo what a sad reality for women”. This is an interpersonal conversation, not a political one. It’s about what a man or a woman feels when they are put in this position. Other women putting in collars or costume is of no concern to me. Even if all you points are true (sexual parts or not, this and that, etc), hypothetically say some toy - like a padding was possible that made your partner happier. According to your own logic, shou…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:44 AM
1

Again, I’m talking about a hypothetical scenarios where breasts could be augmented by the use of some toy or some stuff. And they are sexual for men. It’s only different now because it’s triggering “insecurity” now isn’t it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:32 AM
1

I literally said like a temporary thing, not some life altering surgery “if the tech was safe and available”. please read before commenting.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:30 AM
1

lol why
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:25 AM
1

Ok think about it like this. If his proper fulfilment say, wants bigger breasts, and if the tech was available and safe, would you say “yeah she should get temporary breast implants” or whatever?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:25 AM
1

I’m not at all saying using toys in the bedroom is a bad thing. But stuff like frequency, type of toys, etc, matter. A lot of people are becoming overzealous about men’s resistance to toys but I want you to see this with regard to OP’s specific case. It does suggest inadequacy. Even if he personally feels so or not. A fundamental philosophical distinction I see here is I can only see people as a whole. If I see a woman I see all parts of her as central to who she is, including each and every sin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:19 AM
1

Because then presence and enthusiastic, educated participation would be what is required, not extra toys or whatever. You need to “add” something means that “something” is inadequate in what is present. You don’t need to say it out loud for it to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:50 AM
4

I mean the inference here is that you’re not mentally aroused by the guy at all, it’s about scratching an itch, which is what people are upset about.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:40 AM
2

I won’t tolerate “policing” because it wouldn’t be required. Any person in a monogamous relationship ideally shouldn’t be looking at porn or checking out women in a sexual way consistently.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:38 AM
4

Because strictly speaking it’s not an insecurity. What you’re doing is stating something without saying it - you’re stating your partner’s inadequacy in some sense without actually saying it. Insecurity would be an irrational fear. What is happening here is reaction to stated truth. Again like I pointed out in your case it’s a completely mutual arrangement, but in OP’s case and what most men seem to be discussing in the comments is a totally one way situation. To add - most people seem to be dra…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:36 AM
6

The difference that I see in your case is it is clearly a mutual arrangement between the two of you who don’t really mind and rather enjoy “extras”. But in your comments you seem pretty insistent as it being the right way of life, and if people (men) resist they are insecure. I don’t think it’s difficult to grasp why a woman using a toy (in mutual acts) would trigger insecurity or feelings of inadequacy in men. And if you say you love/care for your partner and he turns you on then you shouldn’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:02 AM
12

I read your other comments as well and I write this from a genuine position from seeking understanding. Hypothetically speaking, one day we could reach a point where the woman wants to just have another man in the room because “bigger is better and there’s no getting around that”. So if a man has a problem with that is he a selfish guy who denies his partner enhanced pleasure?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 12:58 AM
32

It’s so obvious (and funny) that so many people (both men and women) write posts on this sub after having some personal interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 05:33 PM
2

Some things are just connected and intertwined, and they're true. Personality wise, a woman can be literally Voldemort, but as long as she's decent looking there'll be men simping for her without self respect. I hate the negativity surrounding men too, but some things are just true. The solution is to make sure more men have self esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 10:42 AM
2

if men abandon them completely, it's their fault. Not women as a gender, those individual women who act like that I mean. But many men are also super desperate simps, so that's very unlikely
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:40 AM
2

Good bot
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 03:54 PM
1

This right here
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 03:25 PM
8

200k within Reddit is a pretty large subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 01:37 PM
7

Username checks out
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 05:17 AM
1

Good bot
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 04:52 AM
4

I made a similar poll about a week ago...did you vote on it??
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/21 12:57 PM
1

I wish I could award this underrated comment, but for now take my upvote.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 07:19 AM
2

I don't think they want to date anyone at all. One of the biggest criticisms of MGTOW is that they claim to go their own way but their whole eventually circles back to women and their dating behaviour. The same criticism applies to FDS.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/21 03:35 PM
10

They're not saying "mentally ill" as in demented or those with violent tendencies. Their definition also involves those who are in the autism spectrum and other mental imperfections.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/21 08:40 AM
1

The 9 axes test?
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 08:07 AM
1

Did you take the political compass test?
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 08:03 AM
1

I'm not asking if you're loyal or anything. Can you take the political compass test and vote the result you get?
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 04:41 AM
1

That I can agree on sir haha
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 03:05 AM
1

But a lot of women themselves today hold the view that marriage is not important. Can it be good? Yes? Is it critical, no? This is what feminist and even non feminist liberal women say. (Feminist opinion, not mine)
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 03:05 AM
1

Also, Wedding ≠ marriage
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 02:51 AM
3

But one of the core tenets of feminism is the erosion of this idea that marriage should be an end goal for women. Assuming feminism remains strong, Women grow up as little girls dreaming about their wedding This may no longer be true. Haven't you seen Reels and read opinion pieces that go over this issue?
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 02:50 AM
1

So you hold that most people here should be Lib Right, Auth Right, or centrists leaning right? You could be correct, let's wait for the poll to expire. Meanwhile, have been known to openly criticize capitalism. Can you elaborate on this? Why do you think this happens?
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 02:45 AM
1

Authoritarian Right Can you elaborate on your basic views, how and why do you consider your self Auth Right, and how your political quadrant interacts with your opinions regarding feminism and Anti- feminism??
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 02:43 AM
0

Lib Right gang :)
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 02:41 AM
1

Lib Right gang
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 02:41 AM
1

I think most centrists are just people who hold "I judge each situation on its own, then decide". Regardless of political views, objectivity must still be constant, that's why centrism becomes sort of contradictory to me. Most self claiming centrists, I think, do actually have political quadrants, but claim centrism in an attempt to show they are objective.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 02:41 AM
2

Auth Right or Lib Right? centralist Why would you say you are a centralist then? Can you elaborate??
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 02:39 AM
1

??
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 02:38 AM
1

they'll be the ones looking to change things How are you so sure about that?
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 02:37 AM
3

Sad thing is, we can vote on this all we like I just wanted to know the political views of this sub for two reasons Personal curiosity Feninism is considered fairly left leaning, and since this is, well, anti-feminists, people would say that anti-feminism is right leaning. From people's comments, that doesn't seem to be the case, but let's wait for the poll to finish...
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 02:37 AM
1

By no lobbying, you mean no "political advertisement"?
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/21 06:29 PM
2

radical centrist Elaborate please
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/21 06:28 PM
2

Interesting choice Edit: can you elaborate
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/21 06:27 PM
1

xD Are you part of r/SamayRaina as well xD
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/21 06:27 PM
3

Also in Indian politics the system of left and right doesn't work that muc Haha fellow Indian, ikr....
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/21 06:24 PM
1

Wrong. FDS users say men addicted to porn (or even occasional use, not addiction) is bad for women. TRP says porn addiction is unhealthy to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 04:15 PM
2

Said this so many times, no-one listens. They think all feminists are ugly(current standards) and fat. Very very dangerous mentality.
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/21 12:49 PM
1

Who gives a f about her trust
/r/MensRights27/07/21 04:06 PM
5

Agreed
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/21 04:49 PM
29

No wonder suicide rates are so high
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/21 01:10 PM
1

I agree, but if you don't like being called that, the issue is between you and the person who said it. Why should anyone else bother?
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/21 07:28 AM
1

How to get un-invested?
/r/seduction16/06/21 06:11 AM
6

r/femdom has 253k people (which is more than r/femaledatingstrategy btw, and r/gentlefemdom has around 180k I think. What is wrong with these people?
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/21 05:25 PM
1

I wasn't just specifically targeting you. Looking at the memes at the sub these past few days there is a notion that feminist= unattractive, unfuckable, no man looks twice at them. Not true. The quote you posted said something along similar lines. That's why I replied. I was originally going to make a post asking why this notion is a thing but something came up and I forgot about it lol.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/21 01:52 PM
-1

What I think you're saying is anti-feminist men wouldn't want to have sex with those women because their views make them seem "unfuckable". But that doesn't mean that they're in any way actually unattractive or "unfuckable". Quite a lot of men are feminists, quite a lot of men are on the fence and would still date/have sex with such women and there are also a lot of men who would forget their views in hopes of having sex. I completely understand the view that their views are radically opposed to…
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/21 01:25 PM
1

So? What exactly is your point? I really don't believe in this alpha-beta thing, but I don't understand how that is relevant. You're actually proving my point, which is that quite a lot of feminists are also attractive women and successful (or alpha like you said) men are dating/having sex with them. Thus, they're not the ugly "unfuckable" obese women this sub portrays them as. (I'm not ideologically opposing this sub. I'm saying this notion is harmful, because it's simply not true.)
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/21 01:07 PM
6

For example, take a look at most actresses. A lot of them are attractive (and men give them attention) and they are feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/21 12:26 PM
5

I've seen attractive women around me throw around "toxic masculinity" and men simping over them. It's a wrong notion that feminist women are unattractive or "unfuckable". What's the truth is anti-feminist men don't want to associate with feminist women but they have their fair share of simps.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/21 12:25 PM
4

I genuinely want to understand why this is a notion. This is not true, atleast in my experience. A lot of attractive women( by prevailing beauty standards) are also feminists and have a lot of attention.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/21 10:30 AM
3

Basically- is neurotypical, and socially and financially privileged
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/21 06:14 PM
2

“We call for feminist approaches – expansively interpreted – to challenge these stereotypes, making room to consider women who are abusive, power seeking, and sexually aggressive, while taking into account the troubled background many such women possess,” the researchers concluded. This is in the article. "Taking into account the troubled background many such women possess" oh so now it's troubled background not society or gender roles or anything. Whereas a recent post by someone who was sent d…
/r/MensRights26/04/21 07:31 AM
1

The thing to be compared is matriarchal society. Although they are different animals than apes, you can't just take one example like bonobos and then say that matriarchal society is more peaceful than patriarchal society. There has to be corroborative evidence as well. Even if one assumes bonobos are more peaceful than chimpanzees, the meaning of which is disputable, that means bonobos are more peaceful than chimpanzees, not that matriarchal society is more peaceful than patriarchal society. If …
/r/MensRights21/10/20 02:09 AM
1

You might be correct. But, I think other matriarchal societies in the animal kingdom should also be analysed to see if this is really the case. Bonobos have a evolved brain and along with chimpanzees are the closes extant relative to humans. Other animals that can also be carnivorous- like hyenas should also be studied from this perspective for us to arrive at the conclusion that a matriarchal animal society is more peaceful than a patriarchal one, all other factors being irrelevant. However, if…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 12:44 AM
2

It's actually not the case. Primatologist have agreed it's primarily ecological factors that make them so. A relative study found that western patriarchal chimpanzee relatively peaceful. It's the eastern chimpanzees that tended to show aggression. The ranges of bonobos and chimpanzees are separated by the Congo River, with bonobos living to the south of it, and chimpanzees to the north. It has been hypothesized that bonobos are able to live a more peaceful lifestyle in part because of an abundan…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 12:31 AM
3

My final point again, is where you took this conclusion from. De Waal has warned of the danger of romanticizing bonobos: "All animals are competitive by nature and cooperative only under specific circumstances" and that "when first writing about their behaviour, I spoke of 'sex for peace' precisely because bonobos had plenty of conflicts. There would obviously be no need for peacemaking if they lived in perfect harmony." There you go.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 03:51 AM
8

Actually, the study that this conclusion was taken from, was criticised because it wa based on captive bonobos. Primatologists who studied bonobos in the wild documented a more diverse range of behaviour, and wild bonobos show levels of aggression closer to chimpanzees. In captive settings, females exhibit extreme food-based aggression towards males, and forge coalitions against them to monopolize specific food items, often going as far as to mutilate any males who fail to heed their warning. I …
/r/MensRights20/10/20 03:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter