TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gaylooboil Archive

View 0 posts and 134 comments by gaylooboil on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You don't have to agree with them, because let's be real, I could tell you the sky is blue and just because it's coming from me, you'd tell me its red. But don't accuse me of "No evidence, no citations, no sources, no nothing."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 03:32 PM
3

Because in the bloke world, its not usually presented as "Yay sluts! Let's fuck!" Its more like "Sluts are subhuman garbage... But I wanna fuck 'em anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 03:23 PM
0

No nothin' huh? Well maybe you can teach little old spleen ranting me to use sources and citations next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 03:16 PM
1

Because literally all the red pill is, is a description of the world. Oh dear god, get over yourself. You defend your worldview with the fervor of a religious zealot. I'm sorry, but you're literally telling me what I believe? That's absolutely insane. Surely I'm the ultimate authority on what the content of my beliefs is. No, you most certainly are not the ultimate authority on your beliefs. You do not get to define the parameters of how others view you and your beliefs, and you are just indigna…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 03:10 PM
2

OP asked if RPers are hypocritical for bashing promiscuous women, while simutaneously desiring them. You then brought up the analogy that it is like women wanting doctors, but not being doctors themselves. That is not analogous because the operative concept here is the dissonance between hating and desiring something at the sametime, which is an exercise in cognitive dissonance. I'm not arguing that it is not hypocritical for a woman to want a high achieving man while not being high achieving he…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 02:51 PM
1

Why would I talk about how your views fail to describe the world accurately? I am not talking about your views and wider society, I am talking about how your behavior is not in line with what you say it is. I have offered evidence, you reject it all. Again, this is not me failing to understand your beliefs. I know exactly what you think about yourself, and why you think it, this is me disagreeing with your assessment of your own beliefs. I'll agree to disagree with you, but stop telling me I jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 02:37 PM
12

What happens when a once financially successful woman loses her job or quits to stay home? I know TRP likes to believe that men don't give a flying fuck about if a woman works or not, is successful or not, but for a lot of couples, it is a huge stressor. What happens if the wife gets fat, starts moping around the house, and not contributing to anything, and a hot young comes around, shows interest in the man, and it gives him that feeling of excitement again? And don't tell me that that may be t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 02:19 PM
1

I'm not failing to understand your point of view, I vehemently disagree with it. There's a difference. I think I have brought you sufficient evidence of my beliefs. If you don't buy it, well then there really isn't much else to debate, now is there? Additionally, I think it is rich someone who has expressed such hateful, repugnant beliefs is whining about someone coming down on you as harsh, and disrespectful.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 01:34 PM
1

What do you think I fail to understand about TRP and your personal beliefs? Hell, did you even come in expecting me to have honestly held beliefs rather than just inconsistent hatred that I couldn't believe even to myself? I still think that about you. Is there anything you really have to say to me other than you don't like my tone?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 01:19 PM
7

No, its not the same thing at all. This is about addressing the hypocrisy that is bashing promiscuous women while simultaneously seeking them out. A woman seeking out a doctor isn't bashing doctors. Women who bash creepy men, betas, whatever you wanna call it, are not seeking those types of men out. /u/TheGreasyPole presented a shitty analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 01:15 PM
1

Doesn't matter what examples I bring to you, you'll do whatever mental gymnastics necessary to tell me why they don't count. You're not debating, you're telling me why you're unequivocally right about everything. You tell me RPers don't seek to change anyone or anything other than themselves, so I bought up a RP thread that is talking about how welfare needs to be dismantled so more environmental pressure is put on women to stop sucking, and you tell me that doesn't count because they're clearly…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 05:16 AM
1

Maybe if you'd take a second to actually understand what rape culture is, instead of getting your panties in a wad because you're desperate to be offended about something, because you've never had to face any sort of real adversity or oppression in your life, but want in on the business of being a victim, you might understand what the actual argument is. It does not say that all men are potential rapists and complicit in rape culture. It does not say that men are guilty until proven innocent. Ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 03:01 PM
1

You say that TRP has no desire to change existing gender norms, relationships, and issues. I said that there is overlap among TRP and the MRM, which certainly advocates changing society. What does me picking out examples of misogyny on the Men's Rights sub have anything to do with what I wrote? But here is a nice little discussion on TRP today about changing society, not just how to exist in and make the best out of the current state of things. Next, which RP advice is abusive? How about most of…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 02:44 PM
1

So saying "rape culture exists" is as hateful, if not even more, than Red Pillers saying the things I listed?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 02:31 PM
1

She can leave any time she wants. Is that how you hamster abuse? As for the rest of what you wrote, again, there is a huge overlap among TRP and the MRM. TRP even has a men's rights tag. There is certainly a lot of talk about how feminism has destroyed women and society, and about ideas y'all have to change that, which, as I mentioned earlier, includes things like stripping women of civil rights and implementing a Sharia-style oversight of female sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 02:29 PM
1

Nothing in the entire history of the red pill is nearly as hateful as what comes out of the mouths of your average moderate feminist. Oh please. For every one example you can find of a feminist saying men are all rapists who should be castrated (probably said or written 40+ years ago), I can find 10 examples written just today on The Red Pill about how women should be stripped of their civil rights, are all feral whores who need Sharia-style oversight to ensure virginal behavior, who are vapid r…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 02:08 PM
1

There's no hatred lol No demands for women Only passive aggressive "training" her to bend to your will. Oh, and the very heavy overlap with the Men's Rights community, and the desire to topple the matriarchy, putting women back into their place and men back on top as rightful leaders. All there is, is what makes sense for us and a plan to do better. By becoming bullies. You can become a more physically and personality-wise attractive man without joining a group who frequently preaches that women…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 01:40 PM
7

"Make him think you care about him, and then accuse him of rape and take all his money."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 06:42 AM
8

I'm a female. I like watching (American) football. I've never really been attracted to athletes. Some of my favorite players are some ugly ass motherfuckers. I like sitting back with friends and family, opening a brewski, and watching what some dudes can do with a pigskin, especially if it's my favorite teeam. But fuck me for daring, DARING, I tell ya, to invade your "male space" for some entertainment, right? I guess I should get back to pinning my dream wedding on Pinterest as to not offend yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 06:38 AM
1

If tumblrinas spent their time developing philosophies on how to live and advise themselves and work incredibly hard then I'd be okay with them. I'd disagree but I'd be okay with them. The difference between them and me is that they ask the world to change. We don't and the only reason people get exposed to us is because they choose to enter the channels for it. That's a very big difference. We see something critical that we need to discuss and it's on you to involve yourself in it. Motha fucka,…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 06:24 AM
3

You accuse anybody who doesn't respond to you with "yeah, dude, women are nothing but inherently cheating bitches, etc..." with "ZOMG YOU CAN'T EVEN COMPREHEND THE THOUGHT THAT A WOMAN CAN DO WRONG!" You need to get it through your broken, fat head that you are delusional. Let me repeat that for you in caps: YOU ARE DELUSIONAL. Again. YOU. ARE. FUCKING. DELUSIONAL. You are batshit insane. You need to be institutionalized. Most terps, all 125,000 of them, are on a whole other level of crazy, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 06:22 AM
2

That's a fucking word game. They're the bottom of society. Haha, no, its not a word game. People who are incarcerated are not impoverished. Literally. They're incarcerated. Just because society views them as bottom of barrell does not make them an impoverished class. Then prove one. Arguing that the worst thing that can happen to a woman is a not-so-bad reality for a man is just not that persuasive. I already brought up examples. It doesn't matter what I bring to you as an example of female suff…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 10:45 PM
5

Why are you considering prisoners as an impoverished group? They are not impoverished. They are incarcerated. That's why they were not included into the statistic. You are just trying to play Oppression Olympics, the same thing you get pissed at feminists for doing. I know darn well men have some shitty repercussions for their mistakes, but that doesn't mean that women don't, just because their repercussions may be different than men's. Because you are so blinded by your emotions, your visceral …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 09:53 PM
2

I brought sources in my edit. If you're not going to reply to them, that's your choice, but know that they obliterate your argument. Again, you argue that women don't have to mature because they know they have big daddy government or some beta bux to back them up if they do fuck up. My argument is that women have motivation to not fuck up, to not find themselves living on paltry benefits or whoring themselves out. If you'd read my edit, you'd see that even when taking into account homeless men, …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 09:31 PM
2

Please see my edit to this reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 09:06 PM
3

Uh, the homeless and soldiers are counted in poverty statistics... Being in jail is not being in poverty. Families of the incarcerated are often impoverished, though. Again, women bearing the repercussions of men's mistakes. And can you please cite a source that says that there are far more shelters for homeless women than men? Please note I am not talking about the discrepancy between domestic violence shelters, because domestic violencw shelters are not necessarily homeless shelters. What's in…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 07:43 PM
4

This is the truth. Red Pillers love to strip women of basic human experiences in an attempt to dehumanize them, which makes it easier to vilify them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 07:32 PM
9

No wonder you hate women. You are so completely delusional, and just downright wrong about the female experience. So you say that if a woman makes a mistake, which I assume you're referring to things like losing a job, not being able to find a good paying job, not being able to provide for their children, all they have to do is look for a dude with money or turn to the government. Yet there are actually more women who live in poverty than men. The reason for this is that women are the ones who a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 07:13 PM
3

You're right, no man under 6'4 gets laid. Ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 03:07 AM
2

That is such a cop out. "He's just venting, you see. It's just venting! He's in his anger stage. He's just blowing off a little steam!" This does not let him, the post, the commenters, and the sub off the hook from criticism. And it is not unreasonable for people to bring that post up as an example of how toxic, how viscerally hateful TRP can often be.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 03:04 AM
3

It's an evolutionary mechanism for survival. Oh jeez, this evo-psych bullshit again. Care to cite any sort of peer-reviewed, scientific source for this, a source that says that women are more likely to rationalize, more prone to finding themselves in situations of cognitive dissonance, than men? Otherwise, this is nothing more than amateur, armchair philosophy. Do NOT cite me a source that just talks about women and language skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 02:56 AM
1

"Dumb fucking bitch, get back in the kitchen," sending images of a woman getting raped to a woman's inbox, making "jokes" like "what do you tell a woman with two black eyes? Make me a sammich or your teeth are next." etc...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 02:46 AM
1

A man is never insulted for just being a man. The attack is on homosexuals, not on men in general. Another group, a supposed inferior group, is pulled into the equation, and the insult is being accused of being a part of that inferior group. Women are attacked for being women. That in and of itself is enough to insult someone. Being female is a negative thing that will afford you harrassment. Being a man is not. If you are called a faggot, and you're not even gay, no one is attacking anything ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 01:39 AM
1

As opposed to /u/Cyralea's argument, "shut up, woman?"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 09:54 PM
1

What a convenient way to deflect criticism "You can't understand us because you're such a dumb, emotional woman." Its such a perfect illustration of TRP. You are terrified of women. The only way to get over this insecurity is to take any teeth away from women, real or perceived. It's a classic ad hominem. Don't address anything they say, just tell them that their opinion doesn't matter because of who they are. Your whole existence on TRP is nothing but a defense mechanism. TRP, you, you are are …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 09:51 PM
1

I'm big on ancestry research. The majority of my ancestors are listed as being farmers. Some of the women had occupations such as innkeeper and dress maker. My grandmother grew up on sustenance farm. She'd care for the crops, do animals husbandry, slaughter animals, hunt, cook, clean, care for younger siblings, do whatever you need to to survive. Thats probably how I'd live.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 09:34 PM
7

I completely agree, up to the part that that TRP just focuses on female behavior. No, a huge portion of TRP is comparisons between male and female behavior, and of course the male behavior is always superior, and female behavior always inferior. I think people in general are kind of dumb, selfish, and suck at relationships. But it is frequently expressed on TRP that men are superior in every aspect to women. It's not "men do this too, were just not talking about it because we're not interested i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 09:30 PM
2

The abuse that men face online is rarely personal. It never attacks who they are as a person. It is usually just some generic homophobic slurs. The abuse women face online is about attacking them for being a woman. It's attacking a core aspect of who that person is. Attacks against women on the Internet are often far more personal, and thus more vicious. Red Pill approved comment: Because females are overly emotional, overly dramatic children who can't take a little good natured prodding. Now le…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 09:19 PM
1

Good question. I suppose they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/15 06:09 AM
10

I don't think jacking yourself off that hard is healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/15 06:08 AM
1

For someone who doesn't care what others think about the philosophy to which you subscribe, you sure spend a lot of time and energy explainingand defending it to these people who are just irrelevent to your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/15 03:33 AM
4

They seek them out because thats what women find attractive Yeah, no. I mean, maybe a few really fucked up ones, but your average woman? Nah. But go ahead and apply this in real life. I look forward to your panicking post on TRP looking for advice on how to salvage a relationship you fucked up because you took the advice of an internet hate group. It's called hypergamy. Make up whatever little word you want for it, pumpkin, but the adults call it gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 10:05 PM
5

No shit. Many will even seek out "inferiors" as to not insult their superiority. It's called gender roles. But your angle is that this behavior, confirming to gender roles, somehow makes men morally more righteous than women conforming to gender roles. And that's some bullshit. My point is you're getting indignant about these bitch educated women thinking they're all better than their "inferiors," and my point is that's how RPers treat women all the time. Just because you're willing to fuck your…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 07:39 PM
4

But when RPers believe in and assert their inherent superiority for being male/white/Asian/not black/alpha/a STEM major, unlike those bitch educated females, its not unfounded narcissism, its the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 07:26 PM
3

My sincerest apologies for interupting the RP "educated women can't find love becausw they are more narcisstic and entitled than an uneducated woman, who is still a narcisstic and entitled whore" circle jerk. I know its hard for you fellas to face an opposition opinion, but... I think what will happen is you will continue to see society's values change. Highly educated, professional women who only seek men at or above their education and professional level have their feet in two worlds. The firs…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 07:21 PM
2

So you admit that most women, upwards of 99% in ypur estimation, don't like catcalls, but OP is "solipcistic" for making the blanket statement that women don't like catcalls? But I guess ad hominems and insults are how logical and pragmatic men argue these days. The reality is that it doesn't have to work. Ever. Sure, for some catcallers it may once in a shark attack, but it doesn't have to because that's not the point. For some men catcalling is no different than saying "how's it going?" as you…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 07:07 PM
2

It means know your place. It means accept whatever you get. It means do not try to better your lot in life. It means the first-class citizens have decided your sexual fate. It means don't be rebellious. Man, sucks to be treated like that, doesn't it? :D (Even though you really aren't, but that's how you perceive your plight. All of a sudden being on the receivibg end of such treatment is demeaning, its dehumanizing, its offensive to be treated so poorly. Mmm hmm, yes, yes it is, dear).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 05:32 PM
4

Well at least you know you make people throw up in their mouths a little.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 05:17 AM
1

The hell it isn't. My friend dated some pretty good looking middle aged dudes. I have been hit on by some dapper aged fellows. Still creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 05:16 AM
3

Because their governments are run by pedophiles. In all seriousness, don't mistake the legal age of consent with what is accepted by society.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 12:07 AM
12

I don't think that is an inherent example. The thing many men fail to consider is that most younger women want nothing to do with older men, and think older men who who go after younger women are gross, and the young women who go after older men are dumb. Case in point: when I was 18 my friend dated a guy in his early 40s. All my friends, who were the same age as me, and myself, thought he was disgusting and she was an idiot. We refused to let him come around us. This was not us jealous of her r…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 11:59 PM
9

Women shame other women all the time. Women can be purveyors of misogyny and patriarchy. I often read comments from MRA and red pill types who think they have presented a "gotcha" situation when they bring up examples of women being hypocrites and perpetuating female inferiority, because they have mistakingly assumed that feminism and equal rights is a men versus women topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 11:40 PM
3

Feminists believe that both men and women are largely bound by gender roles, and if you address the situation from the perspective of the gender that is often in the subordinate, inferior role, women, that the gender roles that bind men will, by de facto, be corrected, because its easier to take yourself off the pedestal of superiority than it is to raise yourself out of inferiority. The effectiveness of such a stance is up for debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 11:37 PM
1

Can you answer a fucking question and stay on topic? You asked why women are relieved of sexual agency when alcohol is involved, and all you have done is accuse me of twisting your point for bringing up that no, legally women are not relieved of sexual agency when alcohol is involved unless she is so intoxicated that she is incapacitated, as well as discuss social and cultural attitudes around alcohol and sex. Why don't you take the clearly inordinate amount of time you have to make novel-length…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 03:36 PM
2

I think many RPers do take a grain of truth, that it's more common for more weight to be put on men's accomplishments and net worth in hetero encounters, and turn it into this extreme, polarized view that women's accomplishments are irrelevent at best, and a turn off at worst, to men, and women only want top dog when it comes to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 03:22 PM
1

When large portions of subscribers hold these beliefs, your other beliefs are irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 03:16 PM
0

What does Emma Sulkowicz have to do with anything being discussed here? Because she is a performance artist who claims she has been raped? Wow, you sure did show me that the vast majority of women, and people in general think that having sex with even a marginally tipsy woman is rape, by invoking her name.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 03:06 PM
1

Oh really? Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 So let me ask you, what point of yours was I twisting? I also love how you ignore everything else I wrote, and tried to nitpick one thing (because apparently bringing up legal precedence in intoxicated rape cases, is just unreasonable of me and I'm "twisting your point.")
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 03:00 PM
1

There's quite a bit of difference between saying women are moral and intellectual degenerates who crave to be abused, who are virtually only good for their gentals and servitude, versus saying that maybe the way these "nice guys" think they're coming off to others is not the way other perceive their behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 02:32 PM
1

The vast majority are women, however the amount of men receiving it has been rapidly increasing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 02:28 PM
0

Because no woman who was raped when drunk has EVER been told that if she wasn't a drunk slut, it wouldn't have happened. In reality, this is actually what a lot, if not the majority of people believe. The recent outcry, the one you've mistaken for people arguing that it is rape to have sex with a woman who has even had one drink, is in protest to this widely held belief. So don't give me that bull that women are always absolved of responsibility, because the fact is that women are often not only…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 01:44 PM
0

Your question is based on your failure to understand what anyone is actually arguing about in regards to drunk sex. Legally, for rape to occur, the person must be so drunk that they are incapacitated. Aside from maybe a handful of Tumblrinas, not a damn person is saying that it is rape to have sex with a woman who is drunk, but who can still walk and communicate coherently, etc... Of course the world seems like it has gone mad for people.like you. You believe dumb things that aren't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 01:40 PM
0

Probably not very much considering alimony is paid in only about 10% of divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 04:59 PM
9

A world without a surplus resources is better than a world of empowered nasty little disgusting bloodsuckers who refuse to work or pay for their shit. So, like yourself, daddy's bank account boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 04:55 PM
2

My opinion is the same as it was with Jim. If you sense shit everywhere you go, maybe you should check your own shoes, instead of pointing fingers at everyone else, and then swapping out one maladjusted worldview for another one as a coping mechanism. What you failed to leave out about Sally and Betty is that at the end of Jim's story, he joined TRP as a solution to his problems. The corollary with Sally and Betty is that after all this, they decide to become a Tumblr-esque feminazi misandrists …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 09:47 PM
0

I really don't think you get how debate works. You did not present a hypothetical. You presented an allegory, with a premise and conclusion, and then are asking us, those of us who outright reject your premise and conclusion, to accept your premise and conclusion, and I guess hoping someone will still debate with you? If we accept your premise and conclusion, there is nothing to debate. We'd be in agreement with you. I just really don't know how to spell this out for you any clearer. The debate …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 09:31 PM
0

I ain't gonna read all that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 09:20 PM
2

What straw mans do I throw out against TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 09:19 PM
5

Jim is not just one individual who was screwed over. Jim is an allegory for all "nice guys." Bob is an allegory for women in general. If suggesting that maybe the way Jim thinks he's coming off to others, and the ways others actually interpret his behavior is incongruent, as well as rejecting the notion that nice guys are victim of female degeneracy makes you think someone lacks empathy, you need to thicken up your skin, gain some perspective, and get over yourself, pumpkin. You refuse to entert…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 10:08 PM
5

Please, elaborate on how I have no empathy. I mean, this is kind of rich coming from someone who is a member of a group who has postulated such beliefs as women are only good for their pussies, women are incapable of love, honor, and respect, women lack intelligence, moral compass, any real hobbies or interests. Women would rather be beaten than bored. But please, explain to me how it is I who is the real villain here because I suggested that maybe there is a disconnect in how Jim, or nice guys,…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 09:48 PM
7

Because I disagree with you, I have no empathy? Oh Jesus Christ, dramatic much?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 09:15 PM
6

Yes, I did reinvent the story because I disagree the the story from the get-go. I am offering you another perspective instead of jerking yours off for you. That's called disagreeing and debate. And not everyone sees the world in black and white. No one saying that men are always to blame when their hearts are broken, and women are infallible goddesses, which is how I know you're interpreting this. We're saying that maybe, just maybe Jim, or nice guys, aren't as much as innocent victims of female…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 09:14 PM
8

I'm sorry, I guess I should have just stroked your fee fees instead.of.over debate. Yes, dear, you nice guys were just good, honest, kind, maybe a bit awkward nice guys . No one every told you that females are unfair, shallow bitches who are incapable of logic, empathy, love, any real interests or hobbies of their own, who are basically only.good for their pussies, who only go for men who treat them like shit, because that is indeed reality. And every man who is successful with women is an abusi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 09:05 PM
3

Yes, reinventing a hypothetical to fit your narrative is called disagreeing, which is the basis of debate. Did you just want us all to circle jerk with you, not challenging Cyralea's hypothetical situation? It's kind of funny how many of you are shocked, just shocked, I tell ya, because we reject Cyralea's hypothetical situation. Cognitive dissonance is when someone holds two conflicting beliefs. What are the two conflicting beliefs that TheShinyHObbiests holds?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 08:58 PM
9

This hypothetical is not about one individual's personal story. Jim is supposed to be an allegory for all "nice guys." Frank is the guy who gets the girl, and Bob is women in general. It is disingenuous to argue that someone who rejects this broad scenario that the only way to get a woman's attention is to be an unethical asshole, and that all these "nice guys" like Jim are just good, honest dudes, believes that men are always at fault in any situation with women. There are terrible women out th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 08:51 PM
8

You're right. No one other than your RP cohorts will humor your hypothetical, because we reject it from the get-go. Jim was never misled or lied to about what Bob expects in an employee. Bob is not necessarily an unfair employer, and Frank is not necessarily some one-dimnetional asshole. Until Jim gets this through his thick head, Jim will spend his whole life unsuccessful in the field, blaming everyone else for his problems, and having one useless epiphany after the other about why things are t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 08:34 PM
4

They way you've demonized Bob and even Frank? Bob is an unfair employer. Frank is a one-dimentional asshole. Jim is just a sweet, honest, innocent guy trying to make ends meet. Oh please. Jim needs to pull his head out of his ass and he over himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 08:26 PM
7

Let's look.at things from Bob's perspective: Jim is a brown noser who thinks that just showing up and not shitting all over the break room and punching Bob in the face constitutes "hard work." Jim thinks Bob is a God, and worships the ground he walks on. His goal everyday is to butter Bob up, hoping Bob notices him and gives him a raise or promotion. When Bob doesn't play along the way Jim thinks he should, Jim gets pissed and decides Bob is a low life piece of shit. Jim sets out to start his ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 08:18 PM
3

You've just replaced one self-agrandizing, delusional, misogynistic fantasy for another one. This is why you will always be miserable. You'll hamster it away as it being due to the inherent nature of women, but the reality is, dude, you're just a socially retarded chode.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 08:03 PM
1

So dramatic! But anyway, the five stages as grief hypothesis has been disproven for quite some time, now.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 08:00 PM
3

You came to a thread asking Blue Pillers a question, and got a circle jerking answer from a Red Piller. Is that why you came?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 07:59 PM
1

Yeah, only you're drawing that conclusion that the explicit yes campaign means that drunk/tipsy sex is rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 07:57 PM
4

Or maybe you didn't pay attention. Maybe you're just dumb. Maybe you're flipping out and over complicating things when they shouldn't be that complicated, and should chill the eff out, take a deep breath, and approach the subject with a clear head, not an angry "I'm a victim of unfair practices" attitude. I mean, it burns your britches when feminists do that, so you'd think such morally sound folks as yourself would come to a better conclusion than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 07:52 PM
6

So RPers are just the male version of feminists, is what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 07:49 PM
1

50 shades of Gray is about a domineering man, and is held up by Red Pillers as an example of how women want a domineering man.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 01:03 AM
-2

Really? Care to show me an example of these ones in power making decisions who believe that sex with a mildly to moderately drunk woman is rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 01:02 AM
1

Shitty, "I had to dig through pages and pages of tumblr feminists to find one crazy with this opinion," understanding of feminism. I addressed some of my favorite strawmans below: If I'm drunk and a man is drunk, he needs to be of stronger constitution, better judgement, and stronger resolve than me, or he's a rapist. No. No, no, no, no, fuck no. Most feminists are not going to argue that tipsy drunk sex is rape. It becomes rape when the victim is so drunk that they are incapacitated. They canno…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 12:55 AM
8

This. The "50 Shades of Gray is proof that women want to be dominated" camp is suffering from some serious confirmation bias. They ignore the barrage of examples of women not wanting domineering men, and as soon as one example comes along of some women saying "rough, sub/dom sex gets me off," all of a sudden it's all "see, see, you'd all rather be beaten than bored!"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 03:10 AM
2

I would assume he's probably quite conservative and subscribes to traditional gender roles. Definitely a red flag in my book.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 03:05 AM
1

But then as with autism, you'd see bipolar being a sex-coorelated condition, but its not. The prevelnce of BPD is about equal among men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 09:58 PM
3

Reading the responses here, it seems its OK for Indian men to put white women on a pedestal, declaring their preference for this particular race, but if white women do the same, its unfair. They're shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 07:37 PM
2

I am not for making early term abortion illegal, so no, I am not a pro-lifer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 07:24 PM
1

Nope. I am under no delusion that women are not capable of some pretty heinous things. However when you argue that it's women who are more likely to be governed by their emotions, compared to the reasonable, rational male, pointing out the copious amount of situations where men are more likely to throw a tantrum, where they lose any modicum of rationality, is relevant. It's my take that humans, regardless of gender, are often driven by irrationality and emotions, but that when a man behaves this…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 07:22 PM
1

So true. TRP has never once expressed a view point that, at best, dismisses feminine viewpoints, or at worst automatically holds the feminine viewpoint in contempt. Anyone who call you guys out on this is just being an overly emotional victim. Gawd!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 09:07 AM
2

Women, in todays society, have a perfectly free, liberated environment to pursue any sort of sexual desire they wish So true. Women can engage in promiscuous sex left and right and everyone will accept it. Not a single person will ever call her a slut and try to and even succeed in ruining her reputation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 09:01 AM
0

Attractive people attract attractive people. Wow, congrats to TRP for uncovering such esoteric truths that the feminists and mainstream media don't want you to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:56 AM
1

The hard labor of their $10/hour IT help desk jobs?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:54 AM
2

Abortions are immensely expensive and can cause some serious physical damage to a woman, such as permanent sterility. And that's not including the emotional damage it can do. You act like it's as casual as popping a Tylenol, and that's why no one, outside of your echo chamber, takes your stance on it seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:52 AM
0

TIL jews aren't white people. Well if you ask your Stormfront-familiar cohorts...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:49 AM
0

And how do you reach that conclusion from "it's shitty be a jealous, insecure little bitch" to "one must be a man-whore?"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:40 AM
0

So how much you achieve in life is directly related to one's social privilege? Interesting concept............................................................................. Of course white privilege only applies to well-off white girls. Well off white men in positions of power earned it fair and square, god damn it!!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:38 AM
0

In my own personal experience, promisicous women tend to get in relationships with promiscuous men, who ultimately don't give a fuck about their past. Only weirdo "Red Pill" type guys make a big stink over it. There is nothing more beta than seething and harboring contempt for your partner because of their past relationships of your partner. Statistically, marrying the young virgin who has since grown up and realized what a pathetic loser you are is more dangerous for relationships than marrying…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:33 AM
1

Ok, so let me get this straight, you are disputing the claim that men with higher partner counts are more likely to have an STD than men with lower partner counts, by bringing up the fact that women are more likely to contract certain viruses? I guess I;m just confused what your point here is?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:27 AM
2

Women are better at recognizing their own emotions and the emotions of others. This is what it means when people say that women are more emotional than men. What it does not mean is that women depend on their emotions more when making decisions, that women make rash, spur of the moment decision based on nothing more than their fee fees at the moment. This is nothing but rubbish from the "I'm scared of women camp," aka Red Pillers, to devalue the thoughts and opinions of women. If anything, men, …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:18 AM
3

It's interesting how when surveys that show the opposite, that women have less partners than men and are less likely to cheat than men, Red Piller's dismiss them as unreliable because its self reported, and we all know women are god damned dirty liars.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 10:05 PM
5

Wow, a seven year old article on a survey from More magazine, which is like a D-list Cosmo, and reposted on the Daily Mail. Clearly this is some accurate, scientific, factual shit. Thanks for bringing this to our attention, broseph.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 09:21 PM
0

You're a part of a community that says that women are children who need to be treated as such. They need to guided and dominated, lest their inherent degeneracy will destroy everything, and you just more or less used being feminine as an insult here. And you're upset that someone was patronizing to you? Fucking really?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 10:06 PM
-3

Haha, this place is such a RP circle jerk. So this guy had a crush who did not reciprocate his feelings, asked him for a ride one night, and then talked about her one night stand. Now: It all culminates to who I am today, an emotionally barren cesspit of misanthropy. You're smiling at me? Go fuck yourself. You need my help? Rot in hell. You don't like my attitude? Good, fuck off and never come back. I do not want to become alpha, the whole thing is fucking cringe. It is like aspiring to be a sku…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 10:01 PM
1

I'll answer even though you are clearly being dishonest (standard for feminists) because I never said feminists were circulating other statistics to protect female privilege Uh, this is a direct quote from your previous comment to me: No , this is a lies about a study that feminists circulated in order to attempt to protect female privilege . Are you confused?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 09:16 PM
1

OK, lets say the research this blogger is is correct. Where is your evidence that feminists circulated other statistics to "protect female privledge?"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 12:14 AM
0

How is this a bad thing? They have absolutely nothing of value to say, but at least they're showing themselves off. They're not under any illusion that they deserve any better Are you reading a god damned thing here? He was taking about how indignant he is to see women getting attention on YouTube comments for posting links to their cleavage bearing vlogs, and how he doesn't know how to keep "shit like that out of a community" without telling these women "tits or gtfo." Uh, they already are show…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 11:55 PM
1

The fuck there isn't a "default male" point of view. There are far more women who are terrified to let their gender be known because of the abuse it gets them than those "attention whores" who piss you off so much. Look at any post here on Reddit where a female OP who dared post annimage of herself is told "upvotedbecausegirl," or has that 4chan comic of the alleged differences between guys posting a picture of something versus a girl, in addition to all the "checked for gonewild!" And then look…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 11:35 PM
2

Again, this is what you fail to understand. Tits or GTFO does not create an atmosphere where people are tearted as equals and gender is irrelevant. It creates an atmosphere where all commenters are assumed male, no, not a genderless anonymous, a male. It confirms the status quo that men are the default, and women are the "other," an other that is unwelcomed if they so dare let it be known that they are not the default male. It's cool to post here, babe, as long as we can assume youre a dude. It …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 11:16 PM
-3

You're still missing the point: in anonymity, opinions matter, sexes don't. The default isn't man, it's asexuality. Nobody knows, nobody cares until you specify. No, I am not missing the point. I understand your point very well. I vehemently disagree with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 08:44 PM
0

But these women showing their cleavage are in compliance with "tits or gtfo." How would telling these girls who are already showing their tits for attention "tits or gtfo" protect a community from that bullshit? Every website has attention whores, and these attention whores are primarily women. LMAO, I don't think so. It's just when men attention whore, it doesn't rustle your jimmies since 1) male is default. Seeing a male posting something doesn't set off your alarms because status quo: maintai…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 08:34 PM
0

The default value of any poster is zero. No, the default value of a commenter is male. I can't tell you how many times I've been referred to as "he," "this guys," etc... If someone posts a picture of a mixed gender group, and it is known that OP is in the picture, OP is always assumed to be the guy unless otherwise stated. I remember reading a comment on an AskReddit where someone shares their experience as being a parent battling cancer with two young children. The top comment was "I hope your …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 08:26 PM
6

On many online forums, you are assumed male. The male point of view is the default. It is almost incomprehensable to some that the anonymous person with whom you are interacting could be a female. The Internet: where men are men, women are men, and 12 year old girls are the cops. The old 4chan meme would have a point if gender were treated as inconsequential in the first place, but its not. Tits or GTFO is to remind females that if they buck the status quo of the male default point of view, ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 06:58 PM
1

I want you to explain what you think a straw man, as well as a ad hominem, are.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 08:43 PM
3

You postulated that the VAST majority of Hollywood A list men are married to much younger women, and asked us what that says about male sexuality. I gave you a huge ass list of A-list men who are married to women their age or older. Then, like a true hamster, you replied "But,I want examples of men who married after the peak of their fame, to women who are young and not famous!" Give it up, dude. You were proven wrong, and you can't accept that, so now you're trying to save face by moving the go…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 03:47 PM
8

Don't use terms you don't understand, son.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 01:03 AM
11

Hamster hamster hamster. That's all I hear from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 12:43 AM
3

TRP can censor whatever the hell they want, but if that is the case, they need to tone down their whining about other places censoring their view points.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 10:25 PM
1

I'm sorry you have a poor understanding of gender roles and history.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 10:23 PM
0

Oh noes!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 10:19 PM
11

Almost all? I don't think so. Chris Pratt, 36 & Anna Faris, 38 Ryan Gosling, 34 & Eva Mendes, 41 Bradley Cooper, 40 & Jennifer Esposito, 42 Chris Hemsworth, 31 & Elsa Pataky, 38 Hugh Jackman, 46 & Deborra Furness, 59 Ben Affleck, 42 & Jennifer Garner, 43 Jon Hamm, 44 & Jennifer Westfeldt, 45 Denzel Washington, 60 & Paulette Pearson Washington, 64 Actors same age or very close in age with their female partners: Channing Tatum, 35 & Jenna Dewan, 34 Jamie Dornan, 33 & Amelia Warner, 33 Samuel L. Ja…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 09:49 PM
9

But why waste your time on women who are like that? Do you just like a good challennge or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 08:53 AM
2

You will find that huge percentages of business's are all men but there is almost zero business's anywhere that are all female. Except for, you know, schools and hospitals. Teams of women break down because they make in and outgroups and loathe each other. It just cant work due to social issues groups of women have with each other. Please see my post above. This is literally the opposite of what is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 08:47 AM
1

Women are actually better at teamwork than men. Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 It's hypothesized that this is the reason women tend to have higher verbal and emotional IQs than men. I'd also like to quote you from a response you have below here: In all things that require teamwork, those teams that consist of all men tend to work more like a well-oiled machine and those teams that consist of all women or a mixture of men and women don't work as efficiently. You couldn't be anymore wrong. Studies on …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 08:39 AM
1

Men on the other hand have it drilled into them from birth that they MUST care about women in general. They must work to understand, know, discern and care about women as women, as a gender, as a sex, as a class. It's ingrained in us, it's innate in us. I'd say most people would call the police and an ambulance for the unconscious guy, and the attackers would be thrown out. But apparently Red Pillers live in Barter Town where there are constant drunken brawls with roving meatheads to be accounte…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 08:04 AM
1

And conversely, it's true that men have an easier time understanding the world from the perspective of women. Men understand what life is like for women, far, far more than women understand what life is like for men. By orders of magnitude. Haha, well isn't that convenient. When I do it, it's for righteous reasons. When my enemy does it, it's because they're of childish mindset. Come on. This is just a feeble attempt to delegitimize women's opinions, feelings, and experiences, to shut them down …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 07:55 AM
2

And yet here you are, (and TRP in general) claiming you know what a woman's experiences are better than women. If a woman comes along and disagrees with your narrative of the female experience, you sure as hell aren't going to listen her because you know what it's like to be a woman better than some dumb bitch does. And women are the solipcistic ones? Ha! The reality of the situation is that most people, regardless of gender, have a hard time divorcing themselves from their own reality to be abl…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 07:38 AM
4

Health professions aren't low paying or "soft" fields of study.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 07:18 AM
10

Top College Majors for Men: business, social sciences/history, engineering, visual/performing arts, computer information sciences and support, biomedical sciences, education, psychology Forbes Top College Majors for Women: business, healthcare professions, social sciences/history, education, psychology, visual/performing arts, communications, biomedical science Forbes So 6 out of the top 8 overlap between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 07:16 AM
5

From an early age the opposite sex will be instructed never to hit me but I may not be given the same instructions. However, should I strike males I can expect not to be hit back and any social penalties that occur from my actions will actually fall on the male. Girls are taught it's ok to be aggressive? I don't think so. Girls are taught to be more demure, to use their words, or at best, avoid conflict under all circumstances. The whole "never hit a girl" trope is rooted in chivalry. If I’m not…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 03:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter