TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

geengaween Archive

View 0 posts and 281 comments by geengaween on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Watch a video of a standard circumcision, observe the baby get strapped down and then start screaming in pain as his penis is sliced up without anesthetic. Watch as they cut along his penis with the scalpel and peel off the skin. Look at his toes curl and his face scrunch up in agony. It's a pretty abhorrent thing to do to a baby. "Welcome to earth, hold still while we cut pieces of your dick off". And that's not even mentioning the complications that can occur where a baby can lose part of or a…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:31 PM
2

Yeah he makes a couple of points I agree with, but at the end of the day this guy's an uninformed ignorant blowhard. Environmentalism is an antihuman depressing ideology? Wealth inequality is nonsense? Really?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:07 PM
1

And 70% of them initiated by women and/or false accusations. Source: http://newscastmedia.com/domestic-violence.htm .. do you even know where you are? Hahaahahaha You have years & years of catching up to do! 70% of spousal murders are initiated by women or are false accusations? Really. That's not what the Harvard study was saying but I'm starting to realize that you're... Not the sharpest tool in the shed are you. Not the pointiest pencil in the box. The elevator doesn't go to the top floor. "C…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 07:57 PM
1

'Buddy?' Lol Are you from the 1940s? No one talks like that anymore. No wonder you're so clueless. Oh no, grandpa thinks I'm uncool and is accusing me of talking how people talk in the year he was born, whatever shall I do, surely I will never recover from this sick burn. fukiNN Chu IZZ NAwtt FoolIn Ne1 cUZZ, gET teh FuKK oWt wiT daT ShiZZ yo Is that cool enough for you dawg? Want me to slap some dank memes in there too? I aim to please, I wouldn't want you to think that I was a lame waster. all…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 06:41 PM
1

Yeah nah I'm not buying it. This reads like a spiel written by an autist who's never connected with a woman in his life. Using a subreddit to form his opinions about what women as a population are like? You can't get much more autistic than that. Eliot Rodger was a good looking dude too and he also couldn't understand why women hated him. You're not fooling anyone buddy, if you could actually get girls like a normal person you wouldn't be so bent out of shape with hate about them. You can be an …
/r/MensRights21/06/17 05:58 PM
1

Oh you can get laid but you just don't want to. Ok then mate. Sure.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:16 AM
1

They use the exact same invective that you do, you'd fit right in there
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:30 PM
1

lol go back to /r/incels
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:39 PM
1

This encapsulates the mentality of a large proportion of Western women so succinctly. These guys are doing a dangerous and necessary job that saves lives and livelihoods, but what about me me meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:40 PM
1

What the fuck does the age difference have to do with anything? You think an age difference is the only way people can manipulate each other?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 11:53 AM
1

I am saying the solution to avoiding domestic abuse isn't date someone your own age. Nice, another red herring. This has nothing to do with what we're talking about and I never even implied that domestic violence was because of age differences. Try again. You have an incredibly poor understanding of both evolution and human history, bro. Care to point out exactly where I was wrong, or does it just feel wrong to you because you'd really like to believe that men and women are the same?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 11:51 AM
7

lol I am willing to bet a testicle that the creator of this comic is a self hating perpetually apologetic white man.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 05:42 PM
1

Well shit bro, you might want to call all the qualified psychologists and psychiatrists who study psychological manipulation and abuse, because obviously you've got some special knowledge they're not aware of
/r/MensRights22/03/17 05:35 PM
0

I guess it's a good thing horrible domestic violence never happens between people of the same age. What a stupid red herring, c'mon you can do better than that. What the fuck does that even have to do with anything that we're talking about. Are you trying to tell me that she just permanently disfigured him, out of the blue, and there were no problems or abusive behavior before that? You're aware of how incredibly unlikely and implausible that is, right? And this handsome 30 year old dude just ha…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 05:18 PM
1

Are you implying that adults can't manipulate or control other adults through abuse?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 05:09 PM
2

And I'm saying that choice was probably not part of the equation. If she's psycho enough to pour fucking acid on his face while he's sleeping, chances are there were some unhealthy control and manipulation issues there. Handsome young men do not date and cohabit with psycho ugly women who are old enough to be their parent. It just doesn't happen unless something else is going on. It is not up to you to judge his position, given that there would be no judgement were the sexes reversed. Stop treat…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:33 AM
6

Yes. This was an attractive fit guy who was de-facto with an unattractive woman 20 years older than him. Why? It's not like her personality was amazing, if she's the type of psycho to pour acid on him. He should have been with a pretty woman the same age as him. It doesn't make sense that he was cohabiting with this doughy, pale woman with fish eyes. I can almost guarantee that there was some kind of prolonged abuse, blackmail, or coercion going on here. It just screams unhealthy relationship.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:18 AM
1

Go out and talk to some people who want equal rights for women. They'll surprise you. What, the people who were marching around wearing pussy hats and providing a speaking platform for a convicted murderer and a convicted terrorist just because they are women? Women in the West do have equal rights, and in a lot of cases they are treated better than men. So those people are either deluded or dishonest. I highly doubt you're talking about people who are concerned with equal rights in Africa and t…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 11:40 AM
10

While there may exist a few dozen of them, not all feminists are crazy like that. Could you point me to a few that aren't? Because all the feminists I've seen and heard think that white men are a privileged class, sexual dimorphism doesn't exist, the West is a rape culture, and women are oppressed. I don't know what your standards of crazy are but in my view that's pretty fucking loopy.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:04 PM
3

Katniss is a fictional character in a YA novel series. Teenage girls don't really lead resistance armies and blow up fighter jets with a bow and arrow. More than anything else, this says a lot about the SJW/feminist mentality of not being able to seperate fact from fiction. They think that because popular media is constantly shoving the heroic woman trope down our throats, it reflects real life somehow.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 07:55 PM
18

What the fuck? What kind of pussy bitch abandons their dog like that?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/17 06:43 PM
15

Feminists aren't interested in responding to criticism. Why would they be? They get what they want just by talking loudly, calling people privileged/misogynist/racist, and repeating the same things over and over again. They don't care about facts or whether what they're saying is true. They only care about how they appear to other feminists.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 02:34 PM
14

They say it because "guys" is sexist and transphobic and heteronormative and and and and
/r/MensRights27/02/17 06:15 PM
8

Yep, it happened to one of my friends, except it was supposedly a hot Russian girl. I had to sit him in front of the computer and show him all the identical stories of being scammed before he'd finally listen to reason. He hadn't sent any money yet but she was asking him to.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/17 10:47 AM
0

lol you fucking neckbeards posting and reposting shit like this as if it's heroic or some shit. The guy took a swing at a woman who was slapping him. Women are weak, they can't punch worth a shit and they can't take a punch either. Balling your fist and swinging full force at a hysterical woman slapping you is like punching a little kid. Only a pussy does that. It's like none of you have actually been hit before, you obviously can't tell the difference between being slapped by a chick and being …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/17 03:13 PM
69

That's a scam mate, he'll send you a pic of some hot girl and then ask for money so "she" can travel to your country, then mysteriously run into problems and need more money. And more, and more, and more, until the victim either wises up or runs out of cash.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/17 03:05 PM
1

Your solution: force money from everyone, give it to individuals via "subsidies" for birth control. No, that's an incredibly dishonest strawman. My solution is to do what many other countries do which is to make birth control options cheaper at the source for everyone - that's what a subsidy is in this context. I'm not sure where you got this idea of giving people money to buy birth control, or only allowing some people access to subsidized birth control. Conclusion: subsidized birth control doe…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/17 02:52 PM
2

I missed the part where you were arguing against subsidized birth control. If you want less single mothers, obviously making birth control and medical abortion more easily available will reduce the number of unwanted fatherless children. This is not rocket science. Is it moral to use the threat of imprisonment to force me to pay for someone's kid? You're not paying for someone's kid, you're paying so they don't have a kid in the first place. How is it possible for you to so fundamentally misunde…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/17 01:39 PM
0

stfu weeaboo, go jack it to Japanese cartoons
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/17 04:51 PM
10

Yes it seems like there's no place left on reddit for moderates, everywhere's full of either whining SJW's or autistic alt-Righters.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 04:47 PM
28

Sex is a normal essential part of life, everyone does it, people are going to do it whether we approve or not. We may as well subsidize the prevention of unwanted children to save the country massive amounts of money in the long run. If we don't, there will be more criminals, more welfare deadbeats, and more people in prison. There's no logical opposition to subsidized birth control, it all consists of "shouldn't" and "don't want" rather than actual concrete facts.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/17 04:44 PM
24

How about we do the things that benefit everyone and stop doing things that only benefit rich people. As a taxpayer I don't mind a small subsidy going to support women's hygene products, just like I don't mind my money going towards roads I'll never use, or schools my kids will never attend.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/17 11:27 AM
16

Honestly if we can spend billions bailing out rich bankers so they can buy more expensive cars and yachts, subsidizing women's hygiene products to benefit poor people doesn't seem so bad in perspective
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/17 04:48 PM
45

They're not asking for it for themselves, they're asking for it for people who can't afford it - for people who have to choose between a birth control pill or making a payment on their car, or buying food. The point he's making is disingenuous because it assumes that only rich women need birth control when in actual fact it's the poorest people who need it most. Nobody gives a shit if these privileged tattooed starbucks sipping bitches get subsidized birth control, that's not the issue here and …
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/17 02:54 PM
0

lol you bunch of fucking neckbeard weebs.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/17 05:42 PM
251

Stupid thing to say. Unwanted children are a financial drain on the taxpayer and cause crime and unrest. If the taxpayer pays for poor people's birth control and sex ed, the nation saves billions in welfare and crime prevention a couple of decades later.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/17 05:39 PM
1

You're being incredibly dishonest now - we're not talking about "sleeping with" powerful men, Trump wasn't talking about "sleeping with" women. We're talking about rich powerful men groping women and getting away with it. After all, women are just eternal victims. With no agency ever. They're just like trash bags, and men are the wind. They have no control over anything that happens at all, poor things indeed. Get out of here with that buzzword shit. You sound like the equivalent of a radical fe…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 03:46 PM
1

The people who are obsessing about them are the zealots. It's zealotry to care about whether the billionaire president pays taxes? It's zealotry to be suspicious that he's the first US president in history not to release them? Do you even know what a tax return is?
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:44 PM
1

lol. Yes. Anybody who calls out your bullshit nauseates you. HAHA and then further down you talk about "hallucinations". How the fuck do you get a comment about being nauseated by political worship and turn it into "anyone who calls out your bullshit"? Are you 14 years old?
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:42 PM
1

Ah right, "projection". That word, I don't think it means what you think it means. It's not extreme to assume that someone talking about grabbing random women by their genitals is a sexual predator. That's a reasonable assumption that would be reasonable about anyone other than people's object of worship. Then they start bleating about "context". I've seen people do this before with Anita Sarkeesian, she can say the absolute stupidest shit and her loyal SJW lackeys will run rings around each oth…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:41 PM
3

Progressives AND conservatives are cancer. The way you people worship Trump or Clinton nauseates me. Like little oysters following the fucking Walrus. Americans seem incapable of holding moderate views, you people lurch to either one extreme end or the other, nobody is in the middle. You yourself claim to be a liberal but you support a billionaire who wants to scrap the EPA and who's filled his cabinet with money grubbing elites. You're defending a statement about grabbing women "by the pussy" a…
/r/MensRights24/01/17 04:59 PM
-6

It's unbelievable the lengths you people will go to in order to defend this man.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 04:37 PM
-1

Seems pretty accurate to me
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:32 PM
2

I think it's the combination of French and italics. The circumflex doesn't help either
/r/MensRights06/05/16 09:03 PM
2

No, I'd hazard a guess it's more the widely held belief that people who include italicized French in stupid internet arguments usually have an inflated sense of their own importance and/or intelligence.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 05:53 PM
6

Starting your comment off with italicized french complete with circumflex, sets off people's wanker meters I guess
/r/MensRights05/05/16 10:53 AM
4

You must be a witch too! WITCH!
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:04 PM
2

Colonization.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:06 PM
1

What about the girls who slept with Nazis and had their babies? You didn't have a convenient writeoff for that one.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:09 PM
-4

I agree but as with every ideology, most MRA's are idiots so you are going to get downvoted.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 10:52 PM
2

I think some girls would hit the boy if the experiment was reversed. No I don't think so. I think humans generally don't like to hurt each other and children are no different. Little girls aren't violent. I'd be very surprised if either girls or boys hurt someone for no reason.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:06 PM
1

I bet this poster wouldn't exist if that nail polish had been invented by a woman.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 03:39 PM
15

Man this is fucked up. It's depressing how people move from 3rd world countries to escape their backward cultures, only to end up bringing their backwardness with them.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:45 PM
1

Insurance and injury fraud don't real, shitlord.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:05 PM
5

This is actually a women's issue, because society thinks that because women are weak they shouldn't be something something something misogyny.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:01 PM
20

In orientation week at Uni one night we had this band who was set up in the student lounge/bar. In between songs they'd yell semi-coherently about their own days at university, one of them said "if you can't hook up in orientation week you should just kill yourself". The girl I was with laughed and kissed me but I saw the look on the face of one of my introvert friends who obviously didn't have the social skills to get with girls. I felt really bad for him, I still remember the look on his face.…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:16 PM
2

There's an ironically large number of people here to employ methods similar to feminism because "no, we're right". It pretty much becomes fem'masculism'. Same stuff, genders reversed. That's because stupid people want to be included in the cause but they don't understand how to logically argue to support it. It's inevitable once a movement hits a certain amount of people.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 07:35 PM
0

Jesus fucking christ. You're actually comparing the phrase "man up" to racism. You actually just did that. I was wondering when SRS types would start invading this sub. Next you'll be complaining about "ableism" and shunning people for using words like "crazy" because it might hurt the feelings of mentally ill people. This is exactly how feminism started its downward spiral. Zealots like you policing everyone's language and inventing more and more ways to be offended.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 03:57 AM
-3

To my knowledge the term "man up" is considered offensive around here. Don't be like SRS, nitpicking about harmless words and phrases. There's nothing wrong with saying "man up", the offense is caused when it's said inappropriately.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 02:59 PM
1

India just doesn't understand what rape is. They're a deeply conservative and traditional society having a kneejerk reaction to the horrific underbelly of their culture being exposed to the world. They can't enact sensible laws that are fair and balanced because their society hasn't even learned how to treat everyone as human yet. Now everything is rape, the pendulum has swung too far the opposite way. And they're still not really addressing the real problem, which is that you can do pretty much…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 05:39 PM
1

Weird that this is becoming more and more accepted in Western society. Women actually do think they're as strong and fast as men - until it comes to playing sport against men or sparring against them. It's a strange widespread delusion fuelled by bad fantasy novels and hollywood movies.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 05:31 PM
1

Depends what outcome you want. If you want a divorce, you should talk to a lawyer and take pictures of the bruises she gives you. If you want her to stop hitting you, then you need to snap her out of it by taking her by the shoulders and looking her in the eye. Tell her to stop because you don't like it and it's not OK. Tell her that you don't hit her, so she should not hit you. Let her know that you are serious bro, because she obviously thinks it's a big joke. Communication is key here, make h…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:01 PM
2

No, most of them are just collateral damage. Non-combatants who happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. For every 1 person in Israel killed by rockets, 100 Palestinians are killed in return. It's the doctrine of disproportionate retaliation.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 11:26 PM
1

When I first saw her I had trouble believing she was genuine. She seemed way too much like a parody to be serious.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:30 PM
9

I'm READING, fuck face!
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:28 AM
2

I used to visit Cracked all the time but I haven't been there for months, ever since they started publishing all this stupid SJW garbage. I'm sure there are other people like me.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 06:51 PM
4

Hey man, whatever works for you. My friend does yoga.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 04:13 PM
2

I always thought Typhonblue was a man.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 05:20 PM
14

They're a bunch of guys who have found a way to attract selfish, vain women and now think that all women are like that.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:25 PM
40

It's our right to not incriminate ourselves. Making false accusations and then not withdrawing them is perjury and perverting the course of justice.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:20 PM
1

Can't tell if trolling or just stupid. Australia is not in a "giant debt black hole".
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:39 PM
-4

I think this is more about mums not wanting their small children being exposed to a lot of sexual imagery before they're ready for it.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:33 PM
4

I'm thinking nerdy women may be treated as a seperate gender from "normal women" in some respects too... Lots of men (myself included) find intelligent women extremely sexy.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:32 PM
2

I don't think that's true. I think it's just that the people who passionately care about it are the ones more likely to censor because they can't take having their beliefs challenged. Most women who call themselves feminists aren't into censorship, otherwise I think everything would be censored already.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 06:34 PM
6

Because slang words for genitals are so important.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 10:52 AM
4

I don't think it's the stereotype, I think it's the simple fact that most IT jobs are shit unless you happen to work in a management or executive position. It's bad for your body, the work is difficult and repetitive, and the pay is terrible.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 02:46 AM
1

God forbid they let men have their own male space to talk about things that affect men though. Then they're loser misogynist neckbeards.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 02:41 AM
2

Don't worry, this sub has a number of people who will downvote and pedantically disagree with anyone who claims that women are equally as necessary as men. Don't take it personally.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 02:22 AM
9

/r/Feminism is fairly moderate Relatively. They still censor and delete comments that they don't agree with, and ban users at the drop of a hat.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 02:13 AM
2

but I don't want to live in a world where sex is devalued to the point that it is flaunted everywhere. I don't care if sex is flaunted everywhere, what I don't want is for it to be used constantly to make money for media megacorporations. They're warping the general public's idea of sex into something unnatural.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:20 AM
17

I can't help thinking this has got something to do with Julian Assange. If someone blows the whistle on government corruption they can just claim he's a sexual risk and curtail his freedoms.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:13 AM
4

this thread is going to make r/againstmensrights shit bricks.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:02 PM
2

Yeah all men did was rape and be racist. They totally didn't invent nearly every single machine that ever existed, create modern science and medicine, and pretty much build the entirety of civilization. That was all women's work which men took credit for, shitlord.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 10:17 AM
-1

I'm not even an MRA, I was just pointing out an error that you made. I think comparing marriage to slavery is stupid, marriage as it is meant to be is more of a contract that defines the terms of a team. It's only recently that it's become unbalanced and skewed way over in favor of the woman.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:02 AM
16

Everything you described, from the woman-stays-at-home-while-the-man-makes-all-the-money bit to the women-get-preferential-treatment-in-divorce-cases-because-she's-presumably-better-with-children bit, it all has its roots in patriarchy. No it doesn't. In patriarchal societies the man gets the children upon divorce.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:01 PM
22

Sometimes you just have to accept that bad things happen through no ones fault. She was speeding and she ran a red light. It was completely her fault.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 07:25 AM
1

I don't really want more female characters in the games I play and I prefer to play as a male protagonist. I tend to play a lot of violent games that consist of lots of killing and explosions. I enjoy the macho testosterone fueled nature of action games and I think injecting more female characters into them is unnecessary. The experience of games like Gears of War and Call of Duty are not diminished in the slightest from their lack of female characters. I thought the females in Gears of War 3 we…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 06:52 PM
10

You're forgetting that it's their job to indiscriminately have sex with every man who pays them, whether they're attracted to them or not. I dunno about you but I don't think I'd enjoy a job where I'd be required to screw women that I found disgusting. Yes it's easier than some jobs but I wouldn't call prostitution easy work.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:11 PM
13

Because a majority of women totally choose to be prostitutes in countries where prostitution is legal. Oh wait, they don't. You fail sir.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 04:15 PM
2

This idea that some people police what a "real man" is, while denying that women do the same thing to other women and are a hell of a lot more spiteful about it. It seems like there's a lot of exaggeration about men's gender enforcement and complete denial about women's.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:49 AM
3

See, there's this conception of masculinity where no matter how many masculine things you do, if you "slip up" and do one "feminine" thing, you're not a real man. Is there? Who has this conception? Where does it exist outside of gender studies textbooks?
/r/MensRights23/09/13 03:03 AM
11

I am angered by feminists who say that masculinity is wrong They call it "toxic masculinity" but I've never heard them talk about "toxic femininity". I'm not even sure if they think there's any negative aspect to femininity or if they think that any negatives are the fault of men or "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights22/09/13 07:04 PM
0

Great question. My opinion is that ideologies behave like living organisms with a survival mechanism. I think like all ideologies it will find ways to continue it's existence even when it's no longer needed.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 06:08 PM
41

Gender roles are fine as long as people aren't harassed or ostracized for not wanting to fit into them. Most people accept and enjoy their gender roles because they fit biologically.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 06:02 PM
3

Spoiled greedy Hollywood personalities being spoiled and greedy. Nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 06:01 PM
10

So gunning down people in their thousands, running people over with cars, blowing people up, disembowelling, decapitating, immolating, eviscerating, disintegrating people, that's all fine - but mention rape and it's suddenly "problematic" and turns actual rape into a joke. And now you understand the feminist mindset.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:36 PM
8

This is not about equality. This is about complaining for the sake of complaining, something feminists seem to love to do. Video games are a male oriented entertainment form, and despite most feminists not having the slightest interest in games about guns, zombies, cars, and killing, they will still incessantly bitch about it because how dare those men have something fun that is aimed at them. How dare men enjoy something that doesn't specifically cater to women's interests. It's obvious the aut…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:28 PM
-1

lol the irony is so thick you could cut it with a knife.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:26 AM
66

Wow. If there's a better way to make your son the butt of every "momma's boy" joke in the school, I don't know what it is.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:18 AM
2

It's extremely indicative of a wider problem. If you'd ever visited India you'd understand. Rape, sexual assault, and violence is a massive problem there, most of the population can't even read, let alone understand concepts like respecting other people's bodies. There was a case recently where a woman was raped, reported it to the police, and then was raped by the police. It's just out of control.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 10:53 PM
2

Overreacting? They pulled out her intestines with a tyre iron - I'd say it was high fucking time India started reacting to the way humans are treated in their country. In any society where there are dehumanized "untouchables" you can expect life to be cheap and violence to be endemic.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 10:15 PM
8

36% of working women say they resent their partner for not making enough money to allow them to stay home. Male privilege hard at work there, lads.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 10:13 PM
5

I think discriminating on people based on race or sexuality should be illegal no matter if it's a private business. I wouldn't want a shop with a "no blacks" or "no gays" sign opening up in my neighborhood. I don't think people should be allowed to advertise their irrational hatred.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 10:09 PM
8

Courage is making an anonymous accusation of sexual assault? Interesting that the standards of courage for men and women seem to be different.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:38 PM
64

"This is what men's rights look like." Ironically this is the truth. This IS what men's rights look like - they're told that they're evil and misogynistic, shouted down and sabotaged for daring to suggest that they've got challenges and problems unique to them.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:11 PM
1

Ok, so lets define the term "circlejerk": http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=circlejerk A group discussion or activity between like-minded individuals that validates mutual biases or goals in a non-confrontational environment. Yup, I think by empirically testable standards, this sub engages in a lot of circlejerking. Who knew.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:55 PM
1

Erm, nothing, genius. That's why I said "I don't usually join in these circlejerks on this sub, but..." implying I was about to join this one. I think this conversation is over.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:50 PM
1

But how anyone can call it a circlejerk, based on any empirically testable definition of the term is beyond me? It's a slang term, in this context meaning a group of people sitting around agreeing with each other. Lol, how can a slang term be empirically testable? You're just being pedantic, you gronk. I hate this sub. Why? I don't. I just think that often they get worked up about inconsequential shit. Other times they have legitimate grievances.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:05 AM
0

I prefer not to circlejerk at all. Preaching to the quoir isn't a particularly productive activity. Don't really understand what you're saying here. Yes that could easily have dislocated his jaw if she'd hit him with the heel of her hand. Have you ever been hit in the face?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:04 AM
0

Well yeah, it is a circlejerk if they all get together and endlessly agree with each other about how terrible something is, without actually doing anything to fix it. Who is "enemy"?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:02 AM
0

Join in what? Circlejerking?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:59 AM
42

I don't usually join in these circlejerks on this sub, but the way those anchors were fawning and saying "wow" as if that woman did something impressive and amazing made me feel a bit nauseated. Being able to hit men with impunity is definitely an undeserved privilege that women have.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 06:36 PM
3

The propensity to engage with toy cars is programmed by culture. False. Male children have a biological predisposition to play with machines and tools. Female children have a very obvious predisposition to simulate social and maternal activities. Even baby apes will play with toys differently depending on their sex. It's not hard to see why - we have biological roles programmed into our instincts. Men are stronger and faster than women so their instincts in early childhood reflect this.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 04:12 AM
9

Why is this person getting downvoted for pointing this out?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:51 AM
1

Thanks mate I will have a read of this.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 08:25 PM
-1

Non sequitur fallacy. This isn't about blame, it's about making wise decisions about marriage instead of writing marriage off entirely. That's like me asking if you think all men shouldn't be allowed to touch women because some beat their girlfriends. There are almost always red flags, they just get ignored. I'm saying don't ignore them.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 07:04 PM
1

Tony Abbott is a fuckwit.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:41 PM
1

But it's not something anyone should jump into and you need to know for sure. That is not the same as saying "don't get married".
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:38 PM
-6

I'm seeing a lot of reasons not to get married to a greedy selfish bitch, but none that really reflect the experiences of a lot of men (such as myself) who are married to generous, kind, hard working women who think divorce is a dirty word. If anything your points prove that you should know a person very well before you get married and not to make the decision lightly. But you're trying to make it seem like divorce is a constantly hovering spectre in all marriages when it just isn't. If you make…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:55 PM
2

In your linked post, the woman was called ugly and accused of having a "sweaty vagina" because she disagreed with the majority held opinion in the thread. What on earth does her looks and the moisture levels of her genitalia have to do with her opinion? Because the thread is about sexually revealing clothing and prostitution? Seriously, you didn't make the connection between the topic and the nature of the insult? That's some amazingly strong confirmation bias dude. When men get insulted when th…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:10 PM
3

Because the claims they make about sexual dynamics and female psychology only apply to a certain proportion of women, while they make it seem like all women are like this. Sure some women are vapid, greedy, beauty obsessed facebook addicts who are slaves to their biology, but you don't HAVE to spend time with those women. Having relationships with that type of women is a choice. There are plenty of women who are generous, kind, and self-sacrificing, but TRP never mentions them. Red pillers aren'…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:49 PM
2

don't get married, and for good reason What is this good reason?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:48 PM
8

Are you trolling? Fox News is owned by Rupert Murdoch and reflects his conservative agenda in everything they do. It's a right wing propaganda machine. It's about as far from neutral as you can possibly get. I would love to see some of these "independant analyses".
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:30 PM
3

I'M VIEWING THE HOLOPROJECTOR, FUCKFACE
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:14 AM
7

But don't feminists hate beta males because they feel like they're entitled to sex because they're so nice?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:50 AM
5

It's SRS, what do you expect. Those people are batshit insane.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:58 PM
3

I would be willing to bet that The Sims demographic is a hell of a lot higher than 60% female.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 07:01 PM
2

See this is the type of game that women like to play. Games where you build houses and simulate relationships and families. Why can't they just play and enjoy this type of game instead of trying to muscle in on games for which they're not even the targeted demographic? So what if games aimed at men have superficial damsel female characters with big boobs and skimpy outfits? We don't complain about the Sims because all the male character models look like boy band members. Women need to pull their…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:07 PM
11

If they feel that they're masculine then who has the right to tell them differently? All I see is a bunch of photos of average looking guys. Sure they're not the most alpha bunch, but being alpha and being masculine are often two different things. I liked this quote: “Masculinity is an attitude. I feel that I’m masculine because I carry myself as such. It doesn’t have anything to do with what you drive or how many women or kids you have.”
/r/MensRights12/08/13 02:18 AM
1

This thread will probably get deleted, but I think it's a good example of the counterarguments of the srs "againstmensrights" sub. I'm not an MRA but I'd like to reply anyway. This question is ironic because by dismissing these people as "losers with small penises who women don't want to go out with", you're highlighting a massive privilege that women have, namely to pick and choose your partners based on things like how much money they make and how large their penis is. Men have to perform, be …
/r/MensRights12/08/13 02:03 AM
-9

What's this built-in biological mechanism? Testosterone.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 07:39 PM
2

What did you expect. The young Turks are the type of idiots who take viral videos and record intros of themselves talking about inconsequential shit so they can get views. They're like the youtube version of Gawker media.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 07:38 PM
10

Why does society put pressure on men to be strong and powerful? Why would men want to have fantasies about having power? Because we all know women are most attracted to the weakest, least wealthy, and least powerful men. It just doesn't make sense does it?
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:30 AM
3

She was raising money before she was attacked though.... I'm pretty sure a lot of the attack were from the gaming community. do you disagree? I expect most of them were from the gaming community. But they didn't represent the gaming community any more than the man hating fascist radfems represent the feminist community. Trying to equate a tiny minority to a massive and diverse community is just bigoted. You sound sort of childish whining about things that are pretty secondary to the entire proje…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:41 PM
4

It wasn't until she was being attacked and threatened did she become a big deal. Plenty of people are attacked and threatened on the internet but not all of them use it to raise funds for an ideological cause, or parade themselves around like a martyr. Anita also said that her attackers were "the gaming community" and tried to assert that the abuse was the consensus among gamers rather than the aberrant behavior of crazy people. Some people even theorize that she trolled 4chan trying to stir up …
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:56 PM
2

I agree they like to piss and moan about inconsequential shit. However they are not a social juggernaut like feminism and they do not have the support of the majority of their gender. Some whiney posts on Reddit do not equate to the avalanche of unfair criticism men's entertainment recieves daily. And women are only 45% of gamers if you count social media games and The Sims. Using the 45% statistic, most female gamers are aged 45 or older. Go back and check the percentage of women who play actio…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 06:21 PM
7

Can you find where Sarkeesian cited her sources or gave credit to the people whose videos she used?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:47 PM
4

Who's upset? Do you need to be personally affected by a scam before you can criticize it?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:45 PM
4

Looks like someones critiques aren't researched very well. Good thing I didn't recieve 150,000 dollars to make a series of videos that present my opinions as fact. Her kickstarter is one thing. Do you know how many people go to youtube? and you want an open debate on youtube? I wish she allowed comments, but I could not have any real discussion on youtube. EDIT: If you look on youtube comment sections its a mess. Look at the comments on reddit about her videos, its still a mess. And reddit is mu…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:45 AM
9

Yeah so... where is her saying anything about bastion having a damsel in distress? I still don't see it. I read and reread, and kept looking maybe its in a different interview?!! I got confused between that one and another comment she made about Rayman rescuing damsels, which was also poorly researched. I don't obsessively hang on every word she says, fuck me right. Ha! a kickstarter complaint! Comments like yours are hilarious in that you never actually respond. After reading my comment, you so…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:30 AM
13

You mean that interview she was in where she said "I really enjoyed Bastion, but the only female character in the game doesn’t have any depth (to put it mildly); basically, her whole characterization was "The Female."? Yeah, that one. It's the thing that springs to my mind first and it shows she is happy to make bold claims about games she hasn't actually played properly. In her mind her opinion is above criticism and everything she says is fact. She isn't used to being argued with and she isn't…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:10 AM
22

Feminists don't do rational conversation, they prefer emotional displays of anger and self-righteous ad hominem sessions.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:07 AM
23

Because being accused of being a pedophile in your daily job is exactly the same as playing games that aren't aimed at your demographic.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:06 AM
10

Does she? What kind of games does she like? Has anyone ever actually seen her play any? Has she ever said anything about games that didn't serve her agenda somehow?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:05 AM
10

Why can't men have entertainment that is aimed at men? There's plenty of media that is soley aimed at women, that contains extremely sexist depictions of men. But that's ok, because it's not aimed at men. Why can't women respect men enough to allow them the equivalent? Why does everything aimed at men have to also appeal to women as if they were 50% of the demographic (when they clearly aren't)?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:02 AM
13

Are you saying that the presence of garbage means all comments should be blocked? You realize that's the exact same argument censors use to justify censorship, right?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:56 AM
42

let them come. Their arguments are illogical and make them look stupid.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:55 AM
59

I'm waiting for the $150,000 series of videos that scathingly critiques entertainment aimed at women and demands they change to suit the tastes of a small minority of viewers. Twilight should have realistic male characters! Romantic comedies should not always have 2 unrealistically perfect men vying for the attentions of one woman! Romance novels should have more male protagonists! Sex and the City should be all about men! Oh wait, that's never going to happen because men let women have their en…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:53 AM
9

A COD dev got death threats for changing a sniper rifle's rate of fire in a game update. The internet is a massive hate machine and people can get death threats for pretty much anything. Anita knew this and used it to get sympathy money from people with a permanent victim complex.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:41 AM
17

Off the top of my head, she made claims about the game "Bastion" containing a damsel in distress, when if she'd actually played the game she'd know that the game's female character was anything but a damsel. She doesn't cite her sources and doesn't give credit for other people's material she uses, which is the same as plagiarism and the mark of a very, very bad academic. She's happy to let everyone think that she was the one who made the gameplay videos that appear in her series. The problem wit…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:36 AM
1

How was my comment specific? It was a generalization. Wow, I haven't read the books, castrate me and boil me in oil.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:41 AM
1

Most superheroines are designed to appeal to young teenage boys. Pretty much every illustration of a superheroine depicts her in some kind of quasi-sex position that shows off her ass. I'm pretty sure most of the artists use actual porno shoots as inspiration. Of course it's sexist, of course it's unrealistic - but aren't the equivalent males in literature for teenage girls? I don't see any articles decrying Edward from Twilight, or any of the other multitude of sexist, unrealistic representatio…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 10:12 PM
-2

I sat through one of the TV adaptations, does that count?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 01:51 PM
-3

One is the father of modern biology, the other wrote books about the sex lives of stuffy aristocrats.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:07 AM
0

It's from Tumblr, what did you expect
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:04 AM
3

I would say yes. That girl is smoking hot. Then I'd have to deal with the disappointment of her offer not being genuine.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:02 AM
2

It's just jokes. Women like to joke about domesticating men.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:34 AM
1

You can make your "preferences" as specific as you like, the only person it's hurting in the end is you. You're not a woman, and unless you have a buttload of money you don't get to have the opposite sex trying to initiate relationships with you. Therefore you can't afford to be so discriminating. In a few years you'll realize how naive you were.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:27 AM
1

Most commenters were fairly emotionally supportive towards OP, but I can imagine the response would be fairly fucking hostile to the men involved if the genders were reversed. People seem to be able to rationally assess a situation much better when the victim is a man, when it's a woman everyone just loses their shit.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 12:42 AM
3

Marble Madness was misogynistic, as it did not have any female characters. Check your privilege, shitlord.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 04:49 PM
2

We do not wish for their daughter to be left behind either, but sacrifices must be made. He obviously doesn't feel the same way. His own life may be shit if he stays with this psycho, but at least he can give his daughter a proper chance at a good life. If he leaves, that poor little girl is screwed.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 02:50 AM
252

Hasn't everyone realized that Sarkeesian is just a giant fraud yet? If a COD dev can get hate mail and death threats for nerfing some guns in an update, it puts the abuse Sarkeesian recieved in a little more perspective. It's painfully obvious she deliberately baited the trolls for attention. People on the internet will send death and rape threats to anyone and for anything, it doesn't make her a victim of anything but her own lust for notoriety.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 02:46 AM
2

The Young Turks sucks, all they do is take popular videos made by other people and put their own name on them.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 11:22 PM
5

You'd think he would have realized something was up after he divorced his second wife...
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:30 PM
1

The internet is a great tool for communication, but it has the downside of helping lots of crazy people communicate too. Often the crazy people will form large clubs on the internet and encourage each other's craziness. Some examples include people who worship the Columbine murderers, anorexics who encourage others to be anorexic, racists and bigots, anti vaccination groups, and religious fundamentalists. They still only make up a relatively small percentage of the population, the only differenc…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:29 PM
8

4 wives?? 4?!? The fuck is wrong with this guy??
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:53 PM
1

I liked this comment the best: Oh you're going to stay with your parents? That must be really nice, to have parents who would make sacrifices for you.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:44 PM
1

It's easy to be dismissive of the boyfriend's experience but in a way he is a victim as well. He beat up an innocent guy because he thought his girlfriend was raped. I know I'd want to kick seven colours of shit out of anyone who laid a hand on my SO, nobody expects to be lied to about such a serious matter.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:08 AM
2

America is becoming more and more like Russia every day. In 20 years it's going to be a very different country.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:14 PM
1

pick up that can, citizen... I understood that reference.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:13 PM
2

And as usual, the kid loses. The mom is a whore and the only dad it's ever known doesn't want it.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:10 PM
-1

Neither. There's a difference between setting a minimum standard for well-groomedness and requiring everyone to wear expensive business clothes. You already said you spend a long time in the morning getting ready, so maybe you just need to either lighten up or wear the same type of clothes as everyone else. Believe it or not people can work very effectively just by wearing normal neat casual clothes, my employees are proof of that. A corporate environment is not some magical place where clothes …
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:07 PM
2

Activities and sport. Gyms. Book clubs, art and cooking classes. Most community centers have cheap classes you can meet women at. Volunteering is a great way to meet practical-minded women, there are HEAPS of women who volunteer at animal shelters and similar places. Sure they aren't beauty queens, but in my experience extremely beautiful women are a pain in the fucking ass anyway.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:03 PM
3

Idk if you've ever worked in a corporate environment, but you're either not getting it or trolling. No, I never have. I run my own business with a few employees. I'd rather die than spend my life locked in a corporate building with dress codes and office politics and middle management.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:19 PM
-3

Re-read op. It is a problem because there a rules and standards for a reason. You're pretty much saying that every problem in the world would go away if we stopped caring. No, I'm saying that superficial things like dress codes don't help people do their jobs better. As long as everyone is clean and well groomed it shouldn't matter whether they wear jeans or dress pants. Dress codes exist to perpetuate a class distinction, not because there's any practical reason for it. But given your revelatio…
/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:02 PM
-9

I would like to work in a professional environment where dresscode is followed and people act professionally, I hardly hold people to my own standards but wearing bright red leggings and a T-shirt when I have to wear professional dress is a problem. No it's not. It's only a problem if you make it one. If you don't like the environment you work in then change jobs, but don't stir up shit because you've got a bug up your ass about what people wear. If everyone else is happy but you, then you are t…
/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:39 PM
3

I think it's got a lot to do with the social circles people belong to as well. You get a different attitude towards women when you hang out with actresses and models as opposed to nurses and teachers. Some guys spend their whole lives chasing self absorbed glamorous gold diggers and it makes them forget that most women are actually quite nice.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:18 PM
-5

I don't see why this matters. You're not being personally affected by this, nobody is hurting you, you seem like you just want to stir up shit. Almost as if you're purposely looking for things to complain about.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:01 PM
3

It seems like men aren't discouraged by the stereotypes against men. What does that say about women?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 03:22 AM
-3

I think there should probably be some kind of disincentive for abandoning one's family. Kids shouldn't have to grow up without a parent.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:42 PM
-7

Assuming the average includes the cost of extracurricular activities for the kids, I'd say that was my bad and I didn't comprehend the post properly. This kinda happened to one of my close friends so it's a raw issue for me.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:28 PM
-8

Child support should be literally that: money required to keep the kid healthy, well educated, and reasonably happy. Operative term being "reasonably happy". That's highly subjective. Technically all they will need is basic nutrition and watertight accommodation. Yet is it fair to this hypothetical man's first family to scrape by on this bare minimum yet know that his new family and younger wife is getting the best of everything? Child support seems to be a dirty word in MRA-land but I think tha…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:26 PM
-7

Do you think that a rich woman should be allowed to abandon her family, start a new one, and pay the bare minimum child support?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:21 PM
-12

It's not about punishing men, it's about men taking responsibility for the children they've brought into the world. And who is "you all"? Who do you think I am?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:18 PM
-16

So what if a rich father decides to bugger off and leave his family to start a new one? Should he get away with paying the bare minimum?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:39 PM
1

murder has become legal in this country. You're insane. You're totally off your tree. You actually think that aborting a cluster of cells is murder. Wow. This feminist "logic" is bullcrap There's no such thing as "feminist logic", just logic. My argument is logical and objective, yours is emotional and irrational.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 03:55 AM
2

Whether it is or is not at the time of abortion is completely irrelevant. It is totally relevant and the crux of the matter. What it may or may not become doesn't matter if you're going to stop it becoming. If you follow your misguided logic, taking a morning after pill is the same as murder. And that just absurd. If the sperm does not fertilize an egg then there is no potential for a child to exist. So it's not genocide or anything like that. But there is a potential. To follow your flawed reas…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:31 PM
2

Why would she care who takes the twins as long as she doesn't have to? Shouldn't she be happy that they'll have 1 biological parent to take care of them?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:37 AM
2

It's not just some clump of cells. It's going to become a child. Operative phrase "going to become". It's NOT a child - it doesn't have a brain or central nervous system, it is not self aware, and it can't independently support its own existence. It's smaller than a coin. A flatworm has more sentience than a first trimester fetus. What it may or may not become is irrelevant if its growth is halted. I also disagree that the selfishness is a bad thing - abortion ensures that we don't have a genera…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:30 AM
1

Two wrongs don't make a right. Neither sex should be forced into parenthood.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:17 AM
2

I don't think it's morally wrong to force a woman to carry a child to term. Let me guess, you're religious?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 05:14 PM
11

I need feminism because I want to be able to make baseless claims without being challenged.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 07:06 AM
3

The conversation was going pretty civilly until purple decided to stick her oar in. Feminists always seem to have this compulsion to amp up the hostility in a discussion, maybe because their arguments can't stand on their own merits so they have to overcompensate.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 07:03 AM
3

Absolutely he should get a say. He deserves to know the truth about what happens to a gamete that his half of his DNA, and he deserves to be involved at all stages of the pregnancy if he wants to. But he should not be allowed to force a woman to carry a child she doesn't want, just like women should not be allowed to force a man to become a father if he doesn't want to.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 06:57 AM
3

Yes he will be helping, but he isn't carrying the foetus inside his own body so he doesn't get final say on whether it gets carried to term. The alternative is forcing an unwilling woman to have an unwanted baby, which is morally wrong. I support men being able to opt out of fatherhood, but you can't force a woman to carry your child if she doesn't want to. Sexual dimorphism means that men and women will never be truly equal in all ways, and our societal philosophy is just going to have to deal …
/r/MensRights19/06/13 06:55 AM
7

The only way it could be equal is if the man helped carry the baby to term. Since it's gestating in her body, she gets final say on what happens to it. if a man doesn't want to be a father he shouldn't be forced into it, but women shouldn't be forced to have babies they don't want.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:36 AM
1

America becomes more of a police state with every passing day.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:28 AM
1

Not our job to educate you, shitlord.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:21 PM
6

He's a well read columnist in one of the most read newspapers in Australia. It's a pretty big deal when he loses his shit and starts ranting insanely.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:21 PM
4

Whether or not it offends you, what he said is the truth.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 01:56 AM
5

How many of the things on TV are aimed at female viewers Almost everything. Women are the primary consumers of television and they spend the most money on consumer products. Thus nearly all advertising is aimed at women, and as a result nearly all TV is as well.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 11:53 AM
3

I will never understand people who write out deeply personal messages concerning private matters, and then share them with the entire internet. I think that takes a special type of narcissism.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 08:39 AM
1

Where's Anita Sarkeesian when you need her?
/r/MensRights17/06/13 08:31 AM
4

lol feminazi? Send her packing with Abbott as a replacement? You don't know what you're talking about mate.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 01:15 AM
-4

Agree, this was not an attack on men but rather an attack on Tony Abbott and his party policies.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 01:14 AM
7

Amazing. Those men are permanently disabled now because of her. What are the judges thinking when they hand out light sentences like this?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:55 AM
9

Um, I've got some bad news for you...
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:50 AM
-2

He's the Australian version of Mitt Romney.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 09:57 PM
0

I'm disappointed that she's taking this course of action. Overall she hasn't been a bad Prime Minister and she is much better than the alternative of Tony Abbott - who hasn't really even divulged any of his policies yet.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:27 PM
3

But she wasn't a false accuser. So the title is misleading.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:49 PM
4

Did you even read the article?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:30 AM
6

She's just a little girl, she can't be held responsible for this. This is a problem with the system and with society. Weren't the Salem Witch Trials headed by 3 hysterical teenage girls? It seems history repeats itself...
/r/MensRights10/06/13 04:46 PM
3

It's just a video game. In video games you can run people over with cars, shoot them, decapitate them, etc. This should not shock you and if it does, it's time to stop using the internet.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 03:22 AM
1

FAKE
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:43 PM
2

Wow, this is worse than circumcision. Even if the baby's body is abnormal, and as well meaning as the medical staff may have been, a procedure like this needs consent from the person recieving it. It's my belief that this haemaphrodite baby should have been allowed to make the decision when it was old enough.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:41 PM
1

I agree. Like it or not men share the planet with women and our differences can't be reconciled without compromise and understanding. The way I see it the MRA is just the male equivalent of the feminist movement, although admittedly the MRA's are a lot more tolerant of opposing viewpoints and don't tend to be so pro-censorship.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 07:08 PM
2

No, men just protect themselves by using a drill to install a proper bolt lock instead of this stupid thing.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:53 PM
1

My guess is when he doesn't feel like he's under such intense crushing pressure, he'll start wanting to be a part of his son's life.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 06:58 PM
7

What the fuck is it with women and calling awkward guys "creepy"? Seems like a lot of the time they do it just so they can feel better about themselves. It's just so thoughtless and casually cruel. I thought the guy in the ad looked ok, just shows how much I know about women...
/r/MensRights11/05/13 06:49 PM
4

It's not a lost cause. Nothing is set in stone. He needs time to make a decision as to what he's going to do, don't forget that everyone will have been very supportive to you, but who is supporting him? The overwhelming attitude towards him is to man up, grow up, and take responsibility to support 2 human beings, which may make him feel way out of his depth. One thing that is not constructive is to be oppositional or combative towards him. Never put him down. You might feel like telling him he's…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 06:40 PM
1

These are traits like "self sacrifice" and "desire for justice" which are highly subjective and have nothing to do with masculinity or femininity. These are criteria dreamed up by gender studies academics and have little bearing on people's actual gender identity. A man is masculine by his body language, emotional makeup, and demeanor (which incidentally, is supported by the study), not whether he's good at science. Defining being assertive or good at math or science as a masculine trait and the…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 05:10 PM
5

Welcome to Life son, she's a fickle bitch and she'll fuck you up. Problem is it's even worse if you let her pass you by while hiding in fear. Don't hide from life, take whatever she can throw at you on the chest and power through it. Yes some women can destroy you, but if you're careful and not blinded by infatuation you'll be able to see whether she's a vindictive psycho or not. Your friends are often good judges of whether a woman is a keeper or not, because they're not thinking with their dic…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 07:57 AM
13

Sounds like he doesn't want to be a dad, either because he's had second thoughts or he wasn't given a choice in the first place. A lot of men can feel trapped by fatherhood if they weren't ready for it, and from what you've said it doesn't sound like he was given a choice in the matter. He had all these plans for what he wanted to do with his life, and now there's a stone around his neck tying him down for the next 18 years. Unfortunately you can't make him be a good dad but you can leave it ope…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 07:46 AM
1

If gender roles were intrinsic, sex would be a predictor of masculinity. Its not. But it is a predictor, the article said as much, and the fact you are denying this is proof of more confirmation bias. You are seeing only what you want to see and ignoring the vast majority of people who do indeed fit comfortably into their gender roles. Sex IS a predictor of masculinity, for the vast majority of human beings. If someone is born male, it's a safe bet they will grow up with male characteristics and…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 07:32 AM
1

No, the burden of proof is on you since you made the claim. The article doesn't show that gender roles are bullshit, it only shows that human personalities are nuanced and varied. Well no shit sherlock, it's not just humans that are like that but all mammals. Anyone who's ever owned a dog could tell you that. What you "feel" is irrelevant, I am asking you to back up a strong statement you made - which so far you've been unable to do.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 01:56 AM
14

I don't get it. Does posing in the nude automatically make someone a bad teacher? It's not like she was posting the pictures of herself around the classroom.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:35 PM
4

The point is that the distribution of these things seems to support the idea that while men on average act one way and women act another way, an individuals potential is not determined in a significant way by their sex. That depends what you're talking about. Did you read the article I posted? I would say an individual's sex has a large influence on what their potential will be - men are far more likely to perform dangerous or physical jobs, whereas women are more likely to perform nurturing or …
/r/MensRights10/05/13 07:31 AM
3

From the very article you posted: The researchers discovered that while average differences between the sexes do exist (for instance, men, on average, are more aggressive and fantasize more often about sex, while women, on average, are more empathic and express greater fear of success) so differences between the sexes do exist, men tend to be more aggressive and women more empathic. This means that our physiological traits do tend to determine our psychological traits. Saying that everyone is an…
/r/MensRights10/05/13 07:15 AM
3

Most studies I've seen show that traditional "male" gender roles have nothing to do with intrinsic characteristics of people who share traits with what is considered "male" That doesn't even make sense, it's just word salad. I'm going to assume that by "traditional male gender roles" you mean protector, provider, etc. In that case look no further than our physiology - humans are sexually dimorphic species and we're evolved to perform different functions. Gender roles, at their core, are about di…
/r/MensRights10/05/13 07:03 AM
10

Gender roles are only a bad thing if you don't want to conform to them. They are not "bullshit", and we're not "brainwashed into" them, they are an evolutionary mechanism that has served the human race well for millions of years. Most people quite happily grow into them with no conflict at all. I like my gender roles as a man and am comfortable with them. People might be brainwashed into ENFORCING gender roles and ostracizing those who don't conform to them, but the gender roles themselves are a…
/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:53 AM
12

Sometimes I feel like the only guy who likes both chubby girls and skinny girls. As long as they've got a pretty face and are not obese, I am attracted.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:47 AM
8

It's worth noting that women's media objectifies the female body a lot more than men's media. Women's fashion magazines and advertising frequently cuts off the head and obscures the face of female models, reducing their bodies to an article of decoration for the advert or item of clothing they're advertising. It's not unusual to find an advert for yoghurt or something with a female torso as decoration. Men's media portrays scantily clad or naked women, but the face and head is almost always visi…
/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:59 AM
3

Record EVERYTHING. Every text, email, and conversation. When she accuses you of assault (and she will eventually) you need evidence on your side. The fact that she's fucking a cop is very bad for you, he can and will make your life a living hell at her beck and call.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:52 AM
7

His ex has the power to put him in jail and to get him out of jail. How exactly did this happen, where a guy's vindictive ex wife can decide such things?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:36 AM
3

I don't know about smarter, but men are generally stronger, faster, and more willing to take risks.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:29 AM
23

Something tells me this issue doesn't rate very highly on the feminist agenda.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:53 AM
1

That article is indistinguishable from something written on Jezebel. The onion used to be funny...
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:45 AM
3

The author of this article neglects to mention that the majority of western men throughout history would have been uneducated peasant workers. We can't all be alpha warriors with amazing beards.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:54 PM
3

Successful Troll is successful.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 03:22 AM
5

How do atheists think the truth is relative? The truth is the truth. If anything it's religious people who think truth is relative because they say things like "it's true for me".
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:29 PM
4

All the time. I'm always open to counter arguments. Anyone who doesn't doubt occasionally is a fanatic.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:20 PM
12

OP's story is a sad one but every married man here can take some wisdom from it. Women can go for years pretending everything is ok all the while stewing in their own anger and resentment. I recognized some things I do (such as not taking my wife out much) that I should probably make more effort with. It has inspired me to be a better husband and not take my wife for granted so much. It's sad that he rationalizes her physical and mental abuse with his own neglect. Sure he didn't make much effort…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 08:32 AM
2

Nice try? You managed to cut off the last part of that quote: Or is that still possible since it would be my house? And in another post he drops this one: But let's say I record my bedroom. Not because I'm a prev but to protect myself and she doesn't know. So it looks like I actually didn't twist anything out of context. Covering your ass in case you get accused of rape is a pretty flimsy pretext for filming yourself having sex with someone without their knowledge. Just do what the rest of us do…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:18 PM
-1

Yes it is. Read his post again.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:35 PM
-1

Dude, don't film women without their consent, especially in the bedroom. That's fucking weird and really illegal. You wouldn't like it if they did it to you.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:52 PM
6

And a person can weigh significantly more than a model and still be very attractive to straight men. This current standard of beauty that women think men have is because of the fashion industry. The fashion industry favors extremely skinny women with narrow hips, not because they are attractive to straight men (who aren't interested in women's fashion) but because they are more attractive to gay men. As we saw with the OKCupid test, men are a lot more forgiving towards women's appearances than w…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 02:24 AM
6

haha, try saying anything like this criticizing SRS and see how fast they ban you. SRS are such pathetic wimps.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 09:14 AM
3

She probably does it because she hasn't grasped what disgusting behavior it really is. I am a big guy and my tiny wife used to hit me sometimes, casually, as if she thought it didn't hurt when she slapped me hard in the head. And it was really hard. Usually it was in response to something stupid I had said. When she does it you need to talk to her firmly as if to a child. As she tries to hit you grab her arm and tell her in a loud voice "DO NOT HIT ME!" In the same loud voice ask her how she wou…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 07:33 PM
-2

could not agree more with this.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 07:24 PM
0

If Feminism was a religion, Patriarchy would be their Satan. It's a simplistic answer to complex issues that doesn't require much thought and is easy to repeat as a slogan. Feminist theory in general doesn't have a lot of evidence behind it, it seems to be designed more to appeal to the feelings of women rather than to present analysis on objective reality. Take the Feminist narrative on sexual dimorphism in humans, for example. Totally unsupported by science with no evidence whatsoever.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 07:43 AM
1

I have never been treated as such, nor has anyone I know. I don't really see how this is relevant. Unless you know everyone in the world, who cares about your narrow frame of experience?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:20 PM
1

There's a reason for this - it's because most mens cosmetic advertisements (fragrances in particular) are designed to appeal to women, so women will buy them for men. The Old Spice commercial is a good example of this. Men don't tend to spend a whole lot on cosmetic products, and the adverts that are designed to make men feel insecure don't work as well as the adverts that target women.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:01 PM
1

It's not enough. I'm protective of my dog, even reading a story like this rustles the fuck out of my jimmies. Male or female, you can key my car, spill my beer, smash my xbox - But harm my symbiote and I'll kneecap you. I think most dudes could agree with this sentiment.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:26 PM
2

Dude, it says right there in the article that she hoisted it from a rafter by its collar and leash, strangling it to death. Apparently it took almost 10 minutes. It is a horrible way to die and the dog did not deserve it. Do you not read the links before posting a comment? This woman is a psychotic hag and if she did this to my dog I would beat her within an inch of her life.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:49 PM
3

Maybe you should lay off the weed a bit, bro. Weed is great stuff but it's not so great when you're in a rut and need to improve your life.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:32 PM
3

Because slowly strangling it to death by hanging is extreme cruelty and a dog that's been good and loyal for 15 years does not deserve to go out like that. You know that meme that's been circulating about how you should never hit a woman no matter what she's done? There's an exemption for sick twisted bitches who kill defenseless old dogs.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:25 PM
0

The woman who has already bought into feminist ideology and dogma is a lost cause. Reason and or the ability to think critically has been removed from their capabilities. They are the walking dead. Garbage. People can always be swayed by evidence and convincing arguments, sure there are the fanatics whose minds are totally closed, but they are comparatively rare. This attitude that people who believe in bullshit are "a lost cause" or "beyond help" is just a thinly veiled excuse to be more hostil…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:53 PM
4

Really? You don't? You don't see how a culture that considers a video of sexualised violence against women to be fair enough isn't evidence of hostile misogyny? No, I don't. I don't see that the culture considers it "fair enough", as I understand it the video was met with fairly widespread condemnation. I also don't see a pattern of similar behavior. The video is an isolated hiccup and not something that's indicative of the games industry's attitude towards women. You hysterical wowsers take unc…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:17 PM
0

I just don't see how a stupid video about spanking and a "40 hottest" list is evidence of a hostile and misogynistic culture in the games industry. Feminists seem to be grasping at straws in their effort to paint everything aimed at men as bad and wrong.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:22 AM
3

Islam and Feminism, two ideologies with delusions of world domination.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:26 PM
1

I don't see anything misleading about the title. And that is 13 times too many.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:24 PM
3

TIL that the Wall Street Journal uses words like "heteronormative" and "cisgendered" to describe people.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:20 AM
10

That video was scary. The lengths feminists go to stifle opposing viewpoints is bordering on the surreal now. It's not enough to censor and overmoderate their own forums, they have to silence EVERYONE who presents an alternative opinion.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:27 AM
6

I agree sir, you are a voice of reason. The people wanting charges and calling it rape are as crazy as the radfems. He woke up to a failed blowjob. It may have been a bit creepy and awkward, but calling it rape is just fucking hysterical. The real issue here is that she doesn't respect him enough to see that he feels strongly about something and apologize for her mistake.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:22 PM
1

It does suggest an inability to see when it might be wrong.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:00 AM
1

This is just stupid. What arbitrary rubbish. Who decided that blind people were less privileged than retarded people? What the fuck does "privilege" even mean in this context? I'd assume that this was parody if I didn't already know better.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:23 AM
1

It sounds like the manifesto of a crazy person. I don't think you'll find much support for that kind of thing here.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:18 AM
1

Meanwhile hackers who steal information from behind a computer are sentenced to up to 10 years. Gotta love the "justice" system.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:14 AM
3

they wonder, these intellectual, clever, engaged men, why my voice keeps raising and why my face is flushed and why, after an hour of fighting my corner, hot tears burn the corners of my eyes. I wonder that too. If her position is so true and correct, surely she'd easily be able to argue it without becoming at all agitated. There's no excuse for getting emotional during an intellectual argument, if you get angry, it only shows that you know how weak your argument is. Is this why feminists stifle…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:59 AM
4

In 2013, "mucous activists," or mucousists (mucous anarchists) are tasting, baking, making art and painting their lips with their own snot as a gesture of defiance toward the disgust and revulsion that still attends nasal and throat mucous, even in ostensibly modern, Western, secular culture.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:32 AM
49

I think feminism needs a vocal opposition because they are trying very hard to silence their critics and provide themselves with an environment in which argument against the feminist ideology is not possible. Take a look at one of the rules of /r/feminism: Top level comments, in all threads, must come from feminists, and must reflect a feminist perspective - details here. In other words, all initial replies, in all threads, should come from feminists, and, more generally, should be a sincere fem…
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:31 AM
1

what would have been the harm in her committing to the notion that the infant is now the patient and if something can be done to aid it in its survival then it should be done? because it's not as simple as that. Have you ever seen a harlequin baby? Sometimes keeping it alive is not the ethical thing to do.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:22 AM
1

pretty much everything on 4chan is bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:16 PM
2

This is misleading. First of all, abortions are usually not performed on fetuses that are capable of living outside the womb. These are not babies, they are overgrown zygotes. The PP spokesperson was asked a silly question and responded to it with a noncommittal answer. Second, in the rare event that an abortion is performed in the second or third trimester, it's because the baby has such a horrific birth defect that it would die anyway. No abortionist would perform a termination on a healthy th…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:02 PM
2

I agree with some of what's said in this article, we don't exactly have a low domestic violence rate in Aus and it can often be a problem keeping the vengeful perpetrator away from the victim once she's reported it. We had a case a few years ago where a wife that was repeatedly pleading with the authorities to protect her ended up getting stabbed to death by her husband because the local police were lazy and indifferent to her plight. Having said that however, I think it's a mistake for the cour…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:39 AM
2

2 wrongs don't make a right. Locking up innocent men is not going to help genuine victims of crime.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:04 AM
5

What a horrific story. Banks is a better person than I am, if this was me I would be hounding this despicable woman until I got justice. The way she brushed off what she put him through suggests she either doesn't fully comprehend what she's done, or she is a sociopath.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:50 AM
0

I hope this post is a troll. Selling the cars to pay for a wedding sounds like poe to me, but then again some women are obsessed with weddings. She sounds like a sociopath.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:37 PM
4

Weed is for teenagers. Parents should only be smoking it after the kids have gone to bed. There are too many responsibilities that are impaired by weed.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:27 PM
53

I stopped reading when I got to the bit about lowering the Military's standards. That's not equality, that's insanity and a damn good way to lose a war.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:21 PM
1

Doesn't Mario rescue a bunch of Male kings in Super Mario Bros 3?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter