TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

geminia999 Archive

View 6 posts and 61 comments by geminia999 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

So wait, he didn't even personally decline it?
/r/MensRights02/11/22 01:03 PM
8

No, but tattooing a baby is pretty taboo
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:00 AM
6

Well as a person who was also circumcised, I think that I would prefer to have a choice, to even comprehend what I could of had. My foreskin was part of my body, and I was never given any say or consideration in the matter. And If I'm honest, I'm not angry at it, I like my penis (though I recognize now that it's got some scars), It's good that it's not worse, but I feel like circumcising a baby is like cutting off a pinky toe for a baby. Sure, they may not need it or really ever recognize that i…
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:52 PM
12

I mean, I got shadow banned from there for asking people to actually try and understand why regular people would be offended by the Gillette ad there. So not sure what this actual conversation is, if you ask them to be sympathetic to something against their grain, you're gone.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 03:08 AM
4

Seem like laughing at getting away with shitty behaviour. They don't find the act itself funny, they just a reveling in the joy being allowed to do what they want,
/r/MensRights14/07/20 06:02 PM
11

To be clear, I think it started with White fragility and it was adopted for men. It is basically used to say that someone who complains or maybe disagrees with the main narratives is actually just responding that way because their ego is so fragile that anything that challenges them makes them have to respond. Basically it's a sort of kafka trap where they can insult and say bad things about you, and when you respond they say that you are only doing so because of your bruised ego. So when applie…
/r/MensRights07/06/20 07:07 PM
7

Maybe women didn't want to vote If you look to history, there were many women against women's suffrage at the time. That was largely due to the fact that the vote was tied to service of the country (aka the draft). When they decided to take the approach of giving women the right without the obligation, then more people opened up to it.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/20 12:59 AM
1

had better direction than Todd Philips' Joker Can you explain why exactly? I'm not much of a film guy, but direction to me always seems kind of vague as to what it actually entails and why one movie is better than another than just being a better movie (don't most best directors go onto to win best film?). So what exactly should I be looking for to recognize that one good movie is better than another good movie besides preference?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/20 12:41 AM
7

The problem is, they misunderstand both what strength and fear is.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 04:46 AM
4

Why? Because it's based off a true fact (that most societies do have a male leadership role) and is what people want to believe. I mean, it gives something to both sides. To women it gives them an eternal victim history to use to ask for sympathy and protection for. As for men, it gives men the notion that they are strong and powerful, so much so that they've ruled society for forever. The notion that you are a member of a powerful group can be quite empowering (especially when the alternative i…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 08:30 PM
14

Well the email does mention his report. If based off what I've heard from Jack Dorsey, they have a 3 strike system of sorts, so these tweets could have been offense 1 and 2
/r/MensRights04/04/19 08:56 PM
20

Wait, there was more than just one guy involved in the recent shooting or is this related to something else?
/r/MensRights16/03/19 03:46 PM
12

But don't you know, women couldn't choose their jobs and where in forced marriages (while ignoring that men were also forced into those marriages and didn't have many career opportunities for majority of society, and the ones that did were because they were rich)
/r/MensRights13/03/19 03:57 PM
2

There is also a response that I did that I would like to share and develops a bit more on why I think people feel slighted or not bothered at all. The angry commenters are doing so because they, for whatever reason, are associating themselves with the worst parts of masculinity instead striving to be the positive aspects. That is what i find incredibly saddening. These men are angry because they want to feel justified in emulating horrible behaviour. I feel that the negative reaction to this ad …
/r/MensRights17/01/19 01:10 PM
8

You don’t enforce men’s rights by impeding on women’s rights If you are serious, how are women's rights being impeded by disliking an ad targeted at men for men? I'm curious how you come to that conclusion.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:43 AM
20

For her one vid she uploads a year :3 I mean, she's fantastic, but she does not produce much online content outside of Honey Badgers and interviews
/r/MensRights10/12/18 06:39 PM
-1

I mean, the guy was talking in terms of him being a "good man" so I think even that excuse that is always thrown doesn't even apply because he's not talking about his ability to judge, but instead his morality.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 07:33 PM
263

Isn't the stereotypical pedophile a guy who molests boys? I mean, just in general, it seems to me that the image of a child victim of sexual assault is often actually a boy instead of girls.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 04:19 PM
20

Its saying they are homeless to avoid dad beating up mom
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:09 AM
22

It's we are homeless to stop dad hitting mum
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:44 AM
1

I'm not typically affected by this type of news, but this just hurts and sickens me.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 01:13 PM
10

Their most upvoted post is under 1000?
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:47 PM
2

Well, I've always considered gender something quite biological, so it's just quite possible the chemical interactions that go into making a female mind is more likely to occur in male bodies than the inverse interaction. So this doesn't really prove anything, just adds something to think about but we don't really have any proof yet.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 02:32 PM
8

If you're 13 and you're not about to cry over the changes going on in your body, I'd say that's the kid with the mental problem. I don't remember ever really having any issues with puberty >_>
/r/MensRights23/09/16 01:56 PM
2

They are actually both G1, just seasons 1 and 2 being optimus as the leader, and season 3 being rodimus. G2 was basically repaints of toys and some new stuff after the first series finished airing, G2 didn't have any real media attached to it.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 02:46 PM
3

I feel that'swhen people should bring up the extreme cases of MGM, which typically involve slicing the underside of the penis
/r/MensRights20/06/16 02:58 PM
15

How the hell can someone be so damn blind? To fight for the importance of marginalized lives while saying you have no respect for other's lives? This is why people say "alllivesmatter" because you don't really seems to show that you also care them. This is then ignoring that all those men you want to kill, a lot of them are black too, so fuck you and your lies of caring about lives
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:28 PM
1

Positively or negatively?
/r/MensRights29/01/16 06:52 PM
5

There actually was a case of a woman being killed a few months back, it was for getting her current partner to kill her ex, he made a plea deal I believe which saved him from the death sentence, while she was found guilty and killed. Still not a fan of capital punishment though :/
/r/MensRights13/11/15 07:48 PM
8

Ingrained biases of who makes a good parent? I'm not really suggesting a why, just what is likely the case.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 03:11 PM
5

I don't think that's necessarily fair, I'd say to give the mother custody is their reason, not to just have shits and giggles while screwing up a family.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 02:13 PM
4

For example sargon took "normalized" very literally and in a way that it is not meant in that context (anthropology) and then used his alternative definition to debunk it. Well, care to elaborate how it is "normalized"? You fail to explain what an anthropological context even means so how else is one supposed to take the word? If you are making a video to a general audience, shouldn't you be using the general audience's language, or explain ones not in it? Because normalized implies that we view…
/r/MensRights12/10/15 02:09 PM
1

I don't know, where is the internet, is kind of embarassing
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:48 AM
4

Well, what else is the guy supposed to try and pull? If the charge was higher than manslaughter I think a better argument could be put forth, but really the only thing I could think of trying is to say she wasn't in her right mind against a manslaughter charge. A job is a job and sometimes those circumstances are pretty much automatic losses.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 04:36 PM
10

To be fair, the food is about the same as a ticket at the movies
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:03 PM
4

Well I figure for those you could probably call it amputation then (unless the definition specifically involves a limb). Plus the terminology is used for both genders and it seemed to work for girls
/r/MensRights25/08/15 08:40 PM
3

Ignoring of Male victims of abuse. It's always been one of the first issues I think of on the matter and it really disheartens me that it is considered in bad taste to try and figure the actual number of victims and help them. It is also probably the closest issue that I have some experience with (through my uncle being abused)
/r/MensRights05/08/15 01:19 PM
3

Well I wasn't speaking strictly divorce, just regular couples as well, but again, it's anecdotal evidence. As for the people you knew, I have to ask, was it often the women initiating the break up or the men, or about even? There is also a question of whether it's necessarily love, or not being able to reach the standards of the previous relationship, which may also be a factor somewhat.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/15 06:55 PM
14

I'm sorry I don't have any sources or much experience, but I've heard the opposite really. That men care for the relationship itself a decent amount more and then can be pretty devastated when it ends for quite a while. But I think an important aspect to ask is who is stopping the relationship most of the time. Most likely someone who wants a relationship to end and pushes for it, is going to stop loving a lot quicker while the other is going to need a while to catch up. And from anecdotal data,…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/15 06:42 PM
1

My issue with how much he is chasing it. How much he wants this to happen despite his son saying no. I can understand why people do it and not question it as it's just the way things are and they are babies, but do it against the child's own wishes, you really aren't caring for the child are you.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:30 PM
6

I just can't stomach this. This is too disgusting if this leads to him getting hurt. Why the fuck is this dude such an asshole, is it really worth all of this just so he can have a piece of him chopped off against his will? I just am done. This feels like getting an abortion out of spite of the father, it's nothing about caring about the child, it's just to get back at the person who you feel has done you wrong. I'm done, don't call me when this boy inevitability has this done because we're all …
/r/MensRights15/05/15 03:37 PM
1

I thought it was likely a mistranslation of misogyny or the like
/r/MensRights15/05/15 03:26 PM
0

Isn't God's job to explain everything that can't be explained though? Seems like it's doing a pretty good job then to me.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 01:02 PM
1

While I agree that can happen yes, how likely is it really to reflect our current situation. Sure, there likely are some repeat offenders in those stats, but enough to have a major effect on anything, it seems unlikely. And while I do agree about being a good judge and what not, relationships change and so many different things can happen during a marriage to change anything.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:05 AM
0

Maybe the guys who stumbled on psycho exes are the exceptions, not the guy upthread who's about to get married. It is a possibility, but considering current divorce rates it is a believable outcome. Also, considering these people are likely getting divorced once and not multiple times I'm not sure that quote exactly works unless you treat all divorced men as one person which could quite easily be applied the other way.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:25 PM
9

I don't really post here, I just come to look at the top posts and see the discussion and I do see some posts that do bother me. But there is always one thought in my head whenever that comes up, and it's the whole notion of people having the right to be angry. It's something I hear a lot in SJ circles and I'm not exactly sure what to think. On one hand it seems obvious that it should be controlled because anger at best fuels motivation but doesn't necessarily to much good. On the other hand, th…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:36 PM
-1

Well the thing is they are speaking from experience. Sure you can go "Our relationship is different", but how many of those people saying not to get married also thought that same way about theirs? People have blindspots and its very easy for you to believe you are the exception. And personally, I'd like to think that'd be the case with me too, but you have to realize you can be wrong. And when the consequences for a mistake is devastating it's easy to try and convince others to not risk it at a…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:13 PM
2

Only 12.7% of Dads didn’t want their children to have contact with the other parent, while 21% of women indicated they wanted their children alienated from the other parent. This part just makes me want to interpret these stats negatively. I mean, in most cases where a father would get custody, wouldn't the mother of had to been pretty horrible to actually have the father win? And then despite that fact they still wish for the mother who was potentially abusive to still be in their lives is kind…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 03:15 PM
5

While I understand your intention, it'd probably be more worth the effort to just make free access to all that stuff. People will abuse it if that's the case and it's not going to help anyone (especially when companies would drop out of the food market knowing that their ability to make money there is hindered and thus even less food for everyone)
/r/MensRights21/03/15 02:54 PM
10

There is some logic in that people who die can't suffer any more (because their dead), but that's ignoring the main fact they died and that men still experience physical and mental trauma.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 06:05 PM
2

"The new legislation alters the criminal code to describe femicide as any crime that involves domestic violence, contempt or discrimination against women." A previous article I read described this law as merely being essentially a hate crime against women (aka, killing a women due to her being a women), this however paints a much different picture that you are not allowed to harm women at all. Please tell me this article is mistaken.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 03:14 PM
2

I just want to confirm that there is no specific crime for a man being killed because he's a man?
/r/MensRights10/03/15 03:07 PM
15

Can I just say, that billboard is pretty ugly. The composition is just bad and the font and black background is just really lame. I mean, i guess it might grab attention, but that it just bad.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:13 AM
5

"Brazilian lawmakers have approved a bill recognizing "feminicide," or the killing of a woman because of her gender" So it is essentially a hate crime for cases involving women. I do not know exactly how much this entails, but it seems note worthy and it seems likely that there is not an appropriate counterpart for men (I do not know so sorry if I am wrong on this case).
/r/MensRights05/03/15 06:28 AM
4

Yeah, that is just depressing. I mean, they aren't even giving it any thought, just getting instantly angry :( Anyways, hope this campaign goes well
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:20 AM
3

Can we talk more about the "every 46 seconds a woman is raped in this country" statistic, because that seems a lot worse than the 1-4 statistic and specifically says rape as opposed to sexual assault (though I'm not good at translating time over longer periods, but this still seems absolutely inflated)
/r/MensRights25/02/15 04:23 PM
1

Thing is, I've always been taught that Lithuania's movement to free itself was well noted for not resorting to violence. And so this honestly really disappoints me as it feels like a punch in the gut saying that those efforts of being non violent really won't do anything. And I understand that's me being naive, but it's just such a shame that this is happening.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:09 PM
1

Well, I was just thinking if consent could be redacted or something like that, then obvious how could the guy necessarily know it at the time and shouldn't be considered the same as someone drugging someone to rape them.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:11 PM
1

I just thought Date Rapist was usually in terms of people who tend to drug victims and thus a subset of serial rapists. My apologies, I'll just edit it out as even with that intention, a person who would drug someone likely would also do it several times.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:59 PM
1

Okay thank you. I guess it would probably be a bit more important to push the knowledge that all rapes aren't equal and that the lack of knowledge cause us to equate all rapes with the common view of it (aka the worst).
/r/MensRights29/01/15 07:40 PM
2

And the word dick is still commonly used to describe people and no one cares. Why is one reference to genitals in a negative worse than another?
/r/MensRights27/01/15 04:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter