TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

genericusername80 Archive

View 0 posts and 112 comments by genericusername80 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I remain skeptical and maintain due process for everyone regardless. But that doesn't mean I have to go around telling everyone that every accusation is unfounded and then hold up Bill Cosby as the poster child for false allegations.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:44 PM
2

Well... it's a matter of opinion whether the evidence against him is credible or not. Public figures certainly attract allegations like these, whether credible or not. But you might regret making Cosby a poster child for innocent victims of false accusations if something comes out to substantiate these claims. Accusations against Catholic priests sounded made up... until they started being uncovered by the dozens and hundreds. Likewise with accusations against Michael Jackson... In both cases th…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:40 PM
1

This isn't who you want as the poster child for innocent until proven guilty considering the multitude of accusers.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 07:28 PM
7

Yea, and my point is that all of those things are part of either the mainstream feminist agenda or are things that have already become federal policy.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 04:11 AM
5

You say that I made your point for you by agreeing that feminism was not monolithic. Then you say You can't really argue that "the feminist agenda" is to do these wacky things just because some feminists do wacky things. It seems (and maybe I'm wrong) like you're suggesting that I am mistaken in criticizing the "feminist agenda" and that I should rather be criticizing the groups and thinkers in particular that support the policies I cited. That's what my last line was directed towards.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 04:03 AM
6

Whatever you need to say to terminate the discussion and make a graceful exit.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 03:53 AM
9

Well... many feminists DO band together to work on those things. All feminists? Obviously not. I think the only aim that all feminists would profess to be bound by is "gender equality" and even then I bet you could find women who consider themselves to be feminists and do NOT believe in gender equality. So of course it's not monolithic. But that doesn't mean that "feminist agenda" isn't an apt phrase. Obviously there IS an agenda... and all of the things I listed are pushed by feminists. In fact…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 03:48 AM
11

You have no obligation to do anything, but generally when you put forward some skeptical sounding statements you give a reason why you disagree.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 03:11 AM
10

I thought you were going to make a point... guess not.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 03:06 AM
13

Nope, and I don't think there is. I don't think there is some kind of centralized conspiracy. Just a series of ideas that I think are wrong... and the extent to which I think they are wrong ranges from slight disagreement to disgusted and outrage. They tend to congeal together as feminists and feminist groups will often hold one or several of these ideas. I find it convenient to refer to it as the feminist agenda although I also recognize that a self-professed feminist might agree with none of t…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:58 AM
23

Using "rape culture" hysteria to erode protections for defendants in criminal court. Setting up extra-judicial kangaroo courts in universities to expel students based on anonymous accusations, a preponderance of the evidence burden of proof, and no access to counsel (among other absurd rules). Claiming sexism when any job field has women than desired and demanding affirmative action programs so less qualified women can take jobs from men in the name of "gender equality." I could go on...
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:48 AM
1

"Gender studies and African-American studies aside" That's a pretty big aside. It is the victimology studies like those that dominate radical feminist rhetoric.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:32 PM
21

If this wins, it's just going to be an opportunity for feminists to rally about how oppressed they are. No one can just be disgusted with them - any dislike of the feminist agenda has to be interpreted as misogyny.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:24 PM
1

Exactly right. Although here it appears to be a high school... which is maybe even more disturbing for me.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:22 PM
5

He doesn't even bother to call her out for that. Fucking pussy.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 05:31 PM
1

No one is against that. Any death threat should be investigated and perpetrators should be harshly punished. But at the same time using it as a way to reply to criticism is not valid.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 02:25 AM
13

Exactly right. If, as feminists like to claim, women do the same work and get paid less, then why aren't they all just forming companies and exclusively hiring women? They can save money across the board with all of their salaries, which should be 75% or 80% or whatever absurd reduction they claim to experience. They will dominate the market in any field - no one could compete with that kind of reduction in labor costs. THAT is what this businessman was pointing out. He might be deluded enough t…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:15 PM
3

Every single court in the country would call that level of forethought first degree murder.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:09 PM
1

You're going to get a LOT of pushback from people if you say that if there is no crime and no set of circumstances that could ever justify sending a minor to an adult prison. Killing your own grandparents is pretty high up on the list.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:07 PM
1

Yes, there is certainly a correlation. I think it's pretty uncontroversial to say that they probably have something to do with each other as a positive feedback loop. But yea I'm just limiting my comment to how news sources have treated the results of that study in a misleading way.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 10:44 AM
13

That's a pretty relaxed attitude to take towards "usually fine." Yes, the vast majority of your sexual encounters will not involve you being falsely accused of rape. But it really only takes one out of dozens or hundreds of sexual partners/encounters to either ruin your reputation at best or have you thrown in prison at the worst. Your practice of "letting her down" slowly is just common sense man. If you think you've found the secret formula for immunity from false accusations congratulations b…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 08:13 PM
2

Feel free to keep that rule but know that it's going to increasingly be a huge burden on your life that will involve you having to cut out huge swaths of people from your group of friends. Some people will also think the rule is a bit self-righteous - the whole "he who is without sin shall cast the first stone" type of thinking. Are you really so flawless?
/r/MensRights23/08/14 04:57 PM
6

This headline is pretty misleading to be honest. If the myth is that black fathers who are apart from their children spend less time with their children then other ethnic groups, then yes, these statistics challenge that. However, the statistics cited in this article do absolutely nothing to challenge the fact that a higher than greater proportion of black children grow up in single parent homes without a father. Note how the statistics say "similar living conditions." That means comparing white…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 04:50 PM
2

80% is just wrong... sources I've seen tend to say 66%-70%. Of course, that's still fairly high. At the same time, I'd be a little shy about treating "initiated divorce" as "party most at fault." You could have a very amicable and mutual divorce but there still needs to be an "initiating" party. The point about divorce courts being stacked in favor of women is true though.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 04:40 PM
8

Outrageous that a man would dare to hit on a woman.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 05:00 PM
9

It's one of the most popular feminist websites.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 03:21 AM
4

Saying that their actions make them murderers is absolutely absurd. You know basically nothing about the circumstances of their relationship or divorce. Even if we were to assume that it was extremely stressful for him, that wouldn't make them murderers.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 09:18 PM
18

Geez the level of hyperbole on that statement is through the roof.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 06:22 PM
2

Man: "I didn't give consent either, I'd like her charged with rape." Prosecutor: "Nah." Nice try though.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:49 AM
5

http://watchdog.org/102295/in-many-states-welfare-can-pay-better-than-an-honest-days-work/ Food stamps, WIC (Women, Infants, Children), housing assistance, and miscellaneous cash grants.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 06:05 PM
3

You're trying to pick controversial stances in a public forum. Obviously you're going to face a lot of opposition.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:01 AM
3

Yes. Men also have a higher incidence of dying in car crashes. Would you like to call for stricter control of cars? How about higher licensing standards for male drivers? Your argument assumes that guns have zero utility or purpose and are purely a risk factor. It also assumes that removing guns would necessarily result in a decrease in male suicide... a tenuous assumption considering all the various forms of suicide available.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:13 PM
6

no movement to impose stricter gun control and safety What does this have to do with men's rights? Sounds like you're just a liberal with a list of pet projects.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:08 PM
5

Basically just turned the question into "women are victims!" That's how a good feminist rolls.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 07:15 PM
7

Racism will continue to linger in criminal law for a long time. But in this case and the Brian Banks case you do have to wonder if the attorneys were giving the right advice or even had the best interests of their clients in mind.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:26 PM
5

Overdoing it, BDSM is not equivalent to rape. Yes, rape is the most common female fantasy... but your title is just trying to be edgy for the sake of being edgy.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 05:35 PM
2

Haha for what it's worth it sounds like at least one of the relationships you described sounded sexual (non-platonic). I don't blame her but I see your point.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 03:22 PM
9

Yea, and I think things like debunking the wage gap myth or debunking claims of "rape culture" are the most effective way to combat this. Although it might be true, arguing "male unemployment is higher than female unemployment" will not earn a shred of political leverage. I prefer the idea of just stopping and in some cases pushing back feminism where it encroaches on our rights as opposed to greeting it with some male version of feminism. I just think that attacking the excesses of feminism is …
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 06:38 AM
6

I'm contesting the idea that if someone gets you a drink that you should live in fear of them slipping drugs into it. Is it impossible? No. Should you use common sense if someone is suspicious? Sure. But the idea that you can't trust anyone to hand you a drink if you're a woman is just silly.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 01:30 AM
14

It's funny how one of his bullets is "don't be paternalistic," and then every other bullet talks about how you need to defend the helpless women from the big scary "bros."
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 12:24 AM
11

Nope, feeds into the absurd paranoia about date rape drugs being put into drinks. Basically ANYONE who thinks they've been "roofied" simply had too much to drink. The myth is meant to feed into the lack of female agency and the big bad rape culture. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_rape_drug#General_statistics_of_predator_drugs
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 12:22 AM
25

Yes, but you won't win by fighting them with their own tactics. The pity party works for feminists because they are women. No one gives a shit about a pity seeking man.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/14 11:39 PM
14

Their favorite line is "imagine if the genders were reversed." Ok, we get it, there are double standards. It might have something to do with the fact that men and women are different. Now shut the fuck up.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/14 10:51 PM
80

/r/mensrights is even worse for that. They're starting to embrace victim politics in the same way that feminists do. Good for people to drop reminders that power and success doesn't come out of complaining and finger pointing.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/14 10:20 PM
4

Yep. Feminists revel in their victimhood and try to leverage it for political gain. It is fairly effective for them. But I don't think it's a good idea for men. For one thing, it will be less effective - in general people just don't give a shit about victimized men, especially from a political angle. For another thing, I don't think it's a desirable way to approach activism in general. It's a weak crutch that won't apply to a lot of situations, particularly when it comes to "men's rights" v. fem…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 05:56 PM
-4

Man, MRAs are becoming as humorless as feminists. There's going to be consequences when you fight by using their tactics. If you want a society where people can't make jokes, fine, but otherwise I'd recommend adjusting your approach.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 05:02 PM
-5

Doesn't get any more pathetic than that. Sounds like something a marriage counselor would tell you to do.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 02:58 PM
8

He did and this is probably the resolution. It's not like there's any money to be squeezed out of this stone.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 02:29 AM
30

Yea, it's not good when you start with this: Her life is down the gutter: suicide attempts, medication, psychiatric diagnoses, you name it. She’s still hot as fuck though. Tread lightly man. Being close to this girl in any context is dangerous, regardless of your behavior. She's on a hair trigger. She could be chatting with a friend about how great you are one moment, and then the next moment be convinced that you raped her (regardless of the facts). I'd stay away.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 11:33 PM
19

You're forgetting the fundamental principle that women are always victims and men are always sexual predators. Your accusation is invalid.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:22 PM
1

This whole "marketing" scheme assumes that there is some "correct" #% which society SHOULD be at. It assumes that there should be 50/50 parity... or 40/60 breakdown, or whatever breakdown the intellectual in charge of the campaign says there should be. It smacks of a planned economy. How is someone who says "more men should be nurses" any better than someone who says "fewer women should be CEOs"? You're saying that it isn't coercive... that's debatable but no matter what it is, it's still "big b…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:45 AM
10

“I think men have gotten away with being over privileged for too long,” Fucci said. “They think that they can get by without a degree, but a high school diploma won’t cut it anymore. Once guys realize that they need a degree and that they can get scholarships and financial aid, hopefully the amount of men and women graduating will be more balanced.” Damn that guy has been brainwashed pretty good. The trend is going in the opposite direction dumbass... and it'll continue that way for the foreseea…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 06:53 PM
83

It's women's studies, so it doesn't really matter what the credit is given for. Besides being the least rigorous subjects imaginable, anything is graded purely through the eyes of the professor's own uninformed biases.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 04:06 PM
1

What really happens is that there is no limit to the advocacy groups and what satisfies them. There will be no point below 50% at which the feminists will simply say "ok, that is a fair representation." Less than 50% of executives are women? Sexism. Less than 50% of engineers are women? Sexism. Less than 50% of McDonalds workers are women? Uh... empowerment! Notice that feminists couldn't give less of a shit about representation in traditionally low-status jobs. Also notice that they don't give …
/r/MensRights01/07/14 06:49 PM
1

What do you accomplish by "correcting the gender imbalance?" You'd think if you want some big marketing campaigns you would provide a shred of evidence that it is better to have more men in nursing or more women in computer science, that there is some advantage to having a 50/50 split in every career field. Also it's just such a bizarre ideology that perceives every man and woman as an identical robot - insert marketing and all other incentives that drive them to one career path or another sudde…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 01:24 PM
2

Don't know but here's a place to start. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_evasion#Emigration_during_the_Vietnam_War
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:16 AM
2

Describing Andrea Dworkin as an outlier feminist is pretty ridiculous anyway. She was probably THE MOST influential radical feminist. Her ideology is still widely taught in any gender studies classroom.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:08 AM
1

Its called draft-dodging and people did it. They'd flee to Canada and burn their draft cards. You can be prosecuted for it. You can also try to be a conscientious objector.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:05 AM
4

Alright hold your horses. The opposition to the last draft WAS extreme... there were riots, homegrown terrorism, and a huge anti-war movement and that was 50 years ago. And that was during the Cold War. Again... I'm not saying the draft couldn't come back! Obviously it can and will someday. But the opposition will be off the charts.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 01:59 AM
1

Meh, I don't claim to be a representative of MRA.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 01:45 AM
1

Yes, no shit... and it will never end. But there is no draft right now nor for the foreseeable future. Shit would really have to hit the fan for the the country to get to that point.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 01:30 AM
2

I can give you some potential legitimate reasons. So few women will be declared fit for service that it might be a waste of resources to have such a draft. The loss of women in a combat situation might be more damaging to morale (I don't have research or experience on this but it's a maybe). But ultimately those are all unnecessary. There doesn't need to be good practical reasons. Men are just more disposable, period. You only need one man to impregnate hundreds of women, not the other way aroun…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 08:08 PM
1

It's a double standard... but it ain't changing. Why is anyone relegated to anything? It's just the way things are man.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:55 PM
2

Yea well there's "should" but no, it will never happen. Honestly there are practical reasons too. There's already a fair undercurrent of opposition to women having combat roles in general for practical reasons - group cohesion, distractions, the difference in physical strength, psychological differences. The women who ARE in combat now are an extremely narrow self-selected group - a general draft of women into combat roles would require a lot of filtering. Even if we had a draft today a ton of m…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:34 PM
12

Yes... and if it ever returns the opposition will be extreme. The opposition to the draft in general will be very extreme. The idea of women being added to the draft would be completely out of the question. While it is plausible that the draft could come back, it will never include women.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:24 PM
1

A one in four workshop... a tornado of misinformation.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:46 PM
66

Well... there is no draft in the US and there is no shortage of wars. So no, it won't end wars. But yes, the opposition to women being drafted is going to be EXTREMELY strong if the draft ever returns.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:30 PM
-1

Never.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:28 PM
2

"Underrepresented" is a completely meaningless term. By that logic men are underrepresented in teaching, nursing, and countless other female dominated professions. Are you proposing that there should be marketing campaigns for all of those fields as well? What about women comprising 60% of college students? Do we need a huge marketing campaign to counterbalance that? Underrepresented is completely meaningless. The truth (that feminists refuse to admit) is that women are just flat out less intere…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:02 PM
5

You have to remember that in war, the primary victims are always women. The millions of men who die? No, they are secondary victims.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:41 PM
3

You’re a Pussy if You Think There’s a War on Men Gee that language sounds awful misogynistic, don't you think? The irony just never quits!
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:01 PM
6

The axes are clearly labeled, there's nothing misleading about it - no one thinks that rape has dropped to zero.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:59 PM
7

Feminists prefer people to think that rape is at epidemic proportions when in fact it has been on a huge decline for years now.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:56 PM
1

How DARE a man send two different emails full of respect for both mothers and fathers?!
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 01:04 PM
0

Rape charges incoming in a few months, whenever she realizes that she's done with this guy and would rather be a victim than be with him.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 01:00 PM
1

Safe words are seriously moot. "Confirming via text" is meaningless. None of this would hold up in court or protect you from a rape charge being filed if she decides to push it.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 12:58 PM
4

It'll probably come in a few months when she "realizes" how traumatic the experience was (ie she finally gets bored of this guy) and decides she needs to protect other girls from him by reporting him to the police.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 12:56 PM
2

Yea, and that's a huge problem. Fortunately it hasn't infected the actual justice system... YET. But yea, we'll see what happens.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:20 PM
1

You sound like you didn't read the document you cited correctly.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:19 PM
1

Actually Charles Waddell Chesnutt and the Tuskegee Institute were big forces who got anti-lyching laws pushed through along with Ida B. Wells. Also note that a lot of lynchings were of white people. Lynching became synonymous with mob "justice" against black people as time went on. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching_in_the_United_States#Statistics
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:15 PM
2

Hm... I'm pretty sure rape still has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in all American jurisdictions. I wouldn't be surprised if there was a movement to change that though. As far as "good reasons to murder" go, you might start getting into voluntary manslaughter territory (depending on the situation and the jurisdiction), and yes, you can get lesser convictions for that.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:03 PM
4

I actually met this guy. Very smart of course (any law professor would have to be). But yea, the Gawker article just goes to show how idiot feminists are trying to ruin the legal system with their absurd notions of consent. A sampler of some of the things radical feminists want in the law... 1) Sex at any level of intoxication - rape 2) Sex without explicit verbal consent - rape 3) Sex without "enthusiastic consent" - rape It should go without saying that this would make the vast majority of Ame…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 09:56 PM
2

Well... I dunno about that. But there is a big proliferation of extra-judicial "options" opening it - for example the kangaroo courts in colleges where a woman can get a guy expelled and his reputation completely ruined by making an unfounded accusation of rape, regardless of how preposterous it is. And yea, it can be easier in some ways to be falsely convicted of rape, in the sense that murder requires a dead body to exist, while a rape conviction can spring out of basically any time two people…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 09:48 PM
1

It's not just you, the criminal justice system obviously agrees with you and murder is prosecuted more harshly than any other crime. But rape isn't far behind... particularly when it comes to children.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 09:38 PM
4

Yea it's pretty nuts. I've only told an extremely rare few people that I was ever falsely accused - I believe (and with pretty good reason) that the vast majority of people who learned about it would assume that it was true regardless of what I told them.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 09:37 PM
5

She definitely will get responses... you're underestimating how many lonely dudes there are out there especially on a place like craigslist.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 08:47 PM
2

"_______ acceptance" benefits no one. It's just a big lie that makes people feel better - it makes fat/short/ugly/weak/whatever people feel like they belong (but people will treat them like crap despite whatever facade of niceties they might put up), it lets them be complacent and not take action to improve their lot, and it makes the in shape/attractive/whatever people feel less guilty for living better lives.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 08:27 PM
2

An "in-demand" actress might make $1k a scene. But newbies and amateurs will make significantly less. You could definitely pay in the $500 area for a scene if you're going cheaper.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 03:00 AM
1

It's a TGI Friday's... that's about as far from class and dignity as you can get. Of course they celebrated that fat chick.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 09:45 PM
27

This is hardly unique to western civilization nor is it new, women have been attracted to powerful killers for all of human history.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 10:12 PM
1

Gotta throw in some America bashing... just couldn't resist! Requesting that a potentially controversial or dangerous event hire private security for insurance reasons is pretty sensible and would happen in just about every civilized country.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:20 PM
11

Cracked was infiltrated by feminazis years ago, spearheaded by David Wong. It's terrible now.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:02 PM
3

You must have gotten lost on your way to the NAMBLA website buddy.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:21 PM
13

Sounds like SOMEONE is suffering from internalized misogyny! Someone will be coming to pick you up and take you to the re-education camps shortly.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:15 PM
1

So? Show me one thing he said that was immoral. Oh no... he's talking about girls, booze and pot! Guess what - the sorority girls who go to those ragers have the same fucking expectations that the guys do! They want good looking guys, guys who want to have fun and party hard, lots of booze and drugs, and people who are down to have sex (but aren't "creeps," whatever they decide that means in the moment). So again, what is ONE email out of those that makes him look bad? Did he talk about violence…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 07:37 PM
3

I don't doubt the hot sauce part of it at all... that's totally plausible. But a six figure settlement in a countersuit? Why??? For what? I find that part to be completely implausible. But hey, if people like to indulge in their revenge fantasies... That Megan Vice story is super fucking nuts though. Pretty horrifying. Sounds like she got away with murder. Either that or she made up the most fucking insane twisted story imaginable...
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 07:18 PM
2

Cute story but obviously fake.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 06:58 PM
6

Looks like you called it. Mental illness was an understatement.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 07:09 PM
5

Yep, TRP invented sexual frustration and it would cease to exist if TRP didn't exist. TRP also invented violence and mental illness. Honestly though, what's the motive to "bury the story" like you imagine that the moderators are doing? This guy here epitomizes the so-called blue pill "nice guy" that suffers sexual frustration and then snaps. “All those girls that I’ve desired so much, they would’ve all rejected me and looked down upon me as an inferior man if I ever made a sexual advance towards…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 07:00 PM
11

Calling the police would have just ended up with him in jail.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 05:12 PM
5

I don't bother openly attacking feminism in real life - it's one of those ideologies where if you question it in anyway, it will ruin your reputation. But here's what feminism means to me. The more a woman self-identifies as a feminist, the more likely she's going to overreact to something I say or tell her friends that I'm being offensive. So... Steer clear. I don't want her as a friend. Likewise, the more she identifies as a "feminist" the more demanding she will be in a relationship, setting …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/14 07:01 AM
1

She's never going to pay off those millions... and she probably won't even pay a fraction of them. The tort awards against her are from one court - her bankruptcy will be set up in a different court. At worst they'll set her up with some long-term payment schedule where she will be paying pennies on the dollar. Sure, they can take her current assets... but based on what we know about the woman, she probably has next to nothing left to liquidate. Since this woman is probably making minimum wage o…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 04:50 PM
1

She was already paid the money... already spent it all... and now she can declare bankruptcy and she will be judgment proof. So she got to enjoy spending a few million dollars and now just will take the credit hit from bankruptcy.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 07:37 PM
2

Men generally are not disposable... but one man? Just another cog. What you DO defines you... what you ARE defines you... but just being another man? The idea of intrinsically being valuable to society, other people, and particularly women just because you are a human being? No, there's no truth to that. That's the point that OP is trying to get across.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 03:43 PM
9

Well no shit, but he has been racist for a long time now. It's only when he put his faith in a gold digger whore that sold him out that he lost everything.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 03:54 PM
2

"Gender equality" is a lie, the only truth is gender difference.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 03:50 PM
6

Save it for men's rights.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 02:24 PM
9

Great way to end up in jail or facing civil charges. If an appropriate time comes, sure... but this hardly seemed like an appropriate time. His bodyguard was there restraining her while she had her temper tantrum, it was a private matter in an elevator (he didn't know the security guard would leak the tape to TMZ)... what was he supposed to do, smack her in the face while his security guard held her back? I think he handled it pretty well.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 02:08 PM
1

Wow what a thrill, a free education about all of the oppressive forms of masculinity! Ally actions? Sign me up!
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 05:13 PM
1

Looks like a fun way to never get laid.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 03:54 AM
1

You'd have to be retarded to think that the MensRights subreddit is only 4% liberal. Guess I know where Wil falls.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:23 PM
5

Why help her? She probably should have put some thought into bringing her purse.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 03:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter