TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

genesislotus Archive

View 2 posts and 129 comments by genesislotus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Haha good luck, they have 80 percent of politicians and banks under control
/r/MensRights04/06/26 10:39 PM
0

It is all of them, not just trump, not just biden or obama or others; it is all of them kissing the same wall. By singling out one you are just fighting your neighbor and helping them keep us divided. You are helping them. People need to realize it isnt about blue vs red, you are under an illusion of choice. You wont get out of this by voting or elections.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 06:30 AM
6

How I feel asking the same question:
/r/MensRights20/04/26 07:55 AM
7

Refuse
/r/MensRights09/03/26 10:35 AM
22

Why marry lmao Stop the primal urges and throwing yourself inro the pit. They arent even really primal but social conditioning since there is no marriage contract in nature
/r/MensRights27/02/26 05:02 AM
66

Because they want as much men to die before noticed as possible
/r/MensRights24/02/26 10:11 AM
36

Well let that system be gone then
/r/MensRights24/02/26 10:09 AM
4

This is carefully crafted and planned system to declaw good men Look at the news on x about epstein, and no arrests or anything. We are desensitized and weak without information.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 09:33 PM
7

They can talk to keep their wife calm and be a good, neutered puppy but they dont go inside the voting booth together
/r/MensRights20/12/25 09:35 AM
2

You actually dont.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 11:06 PM
4

Do you know how much weapon and ai technology can progress in one year let alone 10 or 20 years? If they want we will just become farm animals of rich if that happens
/r/MensRights14/12/25 10:37 PM
3

Soon the rich wont be scared of population because thay can control thousands of drones with simple codes, and then common men arent really needed to exist
/r/MensRights14/12/25 10:35 PM
33

Today you cant change the world peacefully
/r/MensRights05/12/25 04:12 PM
1

Why should it be shit or shittier shit?
/r/MensRights01/12/25 09:43 PM
36

Next time someone says something along the lines of "women would also go if they could" point to this fact.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 04:33 PM
25

Neither you have any obligation even after you marry in this day and age Men remember these comments, dont commit but if you make such mistake be sure to not fall weak
/r/MensRights29/11/25 10:24 PM
11

What are you even responding to? Read my reply again
/r/MensRights28/11/25 06:33 AM
102

Christianity became such mild, almost cucked religion Too much tolerance brings you to this day
/r/MensRights27/11/25 10:14 PM
50

"We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong" Reality is: If we dont do anything, nothing will change.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 01:01 PM
74

Helping them clearly doesnt work, we really need mental wards because women like that should not be in public Likewise for men who have violent tendencies and feel like its ok to hurt women because they are frustrated Nobody would bat an eye for me saying that for those men, but how is it different for the violent women?
/r/MensRights16/11/25 09:15 AM
2

life is hard, some have it harder, some have it easier I have nothing to say that you probably havent heard, but my own belief is that at the end theres no point to anything. you will most likely be forgotten in 100 years like 99.99% of the people if you can do something, why stress? if something is beyond what you can do or not worth the effort, again, why stress? it is all meaningless so live according to your beliefs and be happy. stress will make you bald so aim to have a nice hair by 50
/r/MensRights21/10/25 11:14 AM
6

What happens when both people are drunk? The one with the most alcohol in their system wins?
/r/MensRights01/10/25 05:43 AM
2

When its a man writing and the woman is in wrong they actually encourage compromise and forgiveness lmao Unless they twist the words and have the mindset of men always being wrong and "she must have done that for a reason" or "what did you do to make her react or do that?"
/r/MensRights17/09/25 04:40 AM
11

But that also depends on what is their thought on the "benefit" Someone who can sleep around, but doesnt because they can see its harmful effects or religional reasons etc. and wants a woman with the same mentality would not "benefit" from the current dating dynamics and the lack of morality in the society
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:58 AM
-6

How about we say both parties can be to blame? Men who just use women by lying and empty promises, which creates more soulless people? Like the women who use men for their benefits be it financial (buying gifts, concert tickets, food call), physical (moving things to in their home, building or fixing things) or mental (aka emotional tampon or to entertain her by her creating some drama if you care)
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:52 AM
8

Still disposable resources... we have always been that
/r/MensRights25/08/25 06:25 AM
14

Patriarchy isnt it?
/r/MensRights14/08/25 12:54 AM
2

If ıt was only dogs... Even camels of oil rich get action lmao, what you wouldnt do for money eh
/r/MensRights07/05/25 03:35 AM
1

It wont work though, you cant fight nature Pushing this agenda wont bring the feminists wanted result of men not caring if their wife fucks bunch of other dudes and gives birth to a bastard, it will instead cause men to avoid commitment and marriage further and further to not get treated like the husband in that show. And it is logical that men dont want to be in his place or millions of other husbands who are raising another mans and a cheaters child.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:17 AM
7

So its not rigid no intimacy, you just do not commit and protect yourself even in a casual relationship But I guess the best option is to simply avoid it these days
/r/MensRights12/04/25 04:42 AM
4

It is not for their boyfriends/husbands to understand childbirth is hard, unless you are an idiot you know it is painful and hard. It is about how much control they have over them. Will he go through something idiotic like that because I said so? Basically a test. A weird test that the more you compromise and agree, the more you lose and get disrespected to push limits of your boundaries
/r/MensRights03/03/25 03:24 AM
4

But the point of her post is not that, though. You are trying to nitpick and make it about "men in mens support groups dont talk about womens issues" while that is the half of the story in the post. She is stating that women do talk about mens issues and whatever they face "Lets not forget men face those issues too" but men according to her dont do that. The point of this post is women in womens support group dont do that either. Check out any feminist subreddit and see how much hatred there is,…
/r/MensRights18/02/25 10:28 AM
5

You take half of the claim in the post and then make it seem like thats the only part op is talking about and people are commenting on.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 06:28 AM
2

It is such bullshit that some other person being grateful makes it okay in peoples minds "Men by nature are protectors" stfu and go fight yourself, I dont protect anyone I dont know or want and definitely dont want to die for a piece of land or your politics
/r/MensRights07/02/25 09:12 AM
30

Marriage seems fun
/r/MensRights07/02/25 07:26 AM
22

What if government really really wanted me to throw away my life? First let me see them politicians in the frontlines. They are the ones who had disputes and maybe even started it for benefits. Is my life less worthy than them? Maybe to the government but not me. I won't die for some dumb ideology that they use to brainwash and control. Muhammed Ali went to prison proudly, but if everyone denied then they would not be able to.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 06:30 AM
1

The concept of borders is idiotic to me, we segregate ourselves and be ruled by multiple mafi... governments But we are not living in the perfect world, unless all the common people say "we dont want to die for your superiority game with other egomaniacs" then unfortunately we need the ability to defend ourselves (not just from the outside forces to be clear, thats why gun rights are important). But not go and invade others.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 10:24 AM
2

But who benefits from that even in those times? The people? No, you would continue to work 16 hours a day in a field and send rations to your lords. And the newly acquired lands people (if havent been razed to the ground) would continue to live working and even in worse conditions. It was the kings and the lords acquiring new taxable place and having more reputation by winning in their royal world. Wars in majority benefitted the 0.1 of the world and they are the ones starting those disputes
/r/MensRights07/12/24 10:05 AM
0

what does that mean
/r/MensRights20/11/24 05:49 PM
-16

giving me misogynistic vibes even.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 07:20 AM
10

Seems like it didnt help enough Go find a better one which is quite unlikely with how they are taught today and social narrative of academia. Nothing but brainwashing like you see in many schools.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 04:16 PM
2

It didnt happen to me so it must not be happening to anyone else either
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:06 AM
6

yOu aREnT aReAlL maN uNLeSs yOU acT As i wANt!!
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:02 AM
4

Its very simple. If you are not one of us, you are against us mentality by feminazis is very rampant and people are being polarized more and more by day. Fear mongering media is doing a good job with making us fight each other. In your office life you shouldnt have helped them, shouldnt have made a sound about this political case or any other and should document every instance you have been insulted. It is in your best interest to stay away and always protect yourself.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 09:28 AM
4

by going to military, you are giving your life and taking another human beings life thousands of miles away overseas for basically the same people that control the chess board and made the society what it is today. stop giving your life for a piece of land (or more accurately their war profits)
/r/MensRights03/11/24 12:31 PM
7

why would you run? men need to learn how to say no and no means no
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:06 AM
16

we call those suckers or doormats unfortunately, every minute a new sucker is born, and get brainwashed by ideologies that men are supposed to serve, protect, sacrifice and do this and that. they have no sense of self and feel obligated to of service to society.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:04 AM
1

unfortunately, people will support what they want to believe and fear mongering of media is giving the idea of women being constantly victims which makes them feel a type of way and support those news, even though violent men are less than 1% of men and most violence they cause are against other men
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:51 AM
4

I somewhat agree with the statement, especially in certain age groups and countries, misandry and fear mongering of men are pretty mainstream. But something sexist can also be correct, just like the statement from original commenter.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 04:10 PM
14

I guess semen comes from the sky, but havent ever seen a white rain have you? this whole "women create life" thing is dumb. men and women create life, alone they die out in a century. they dont need us my ass
/r/MensRights21/10/24 09:18 AM
24

do you think they care about men getting hit? people dont even care about men being forced to go to war (so much for bodily autonomy) and getting killed for a piece of land so what does a slap or punch count for? now if a woman gets hit though thats news worthy even if she was the (physical) aggressor if you arent willing to sacrifice yourself, you are even being ridiculed and suppressed into obeying or they jail you. this system is unjust and works only for very powerful while fear mongering in…
/r/MensRights14/10/24 08:36 AM
2

if you take bear over men with no intention of taking a stance or take a jab at men, like seriously pick bear then you should be locked up in a ward lmao and if you really think bears attack you because they have a "reason to" and wouldnt otherwise: you are an unintelligent life form, unless you consider simply being hungry or feeling like killing you as reasons too. bear attacks are low because you dont simply go camping etc. and meet bears with no preparation
/r/MensRights02/10/24 06:53 PM
1

there is definitely an argument with having more responsibility means more drive to become more successful and work harder to be able to provide. people that would not even have full time jobs can get two jobs just to stay afloat after having a family but happiness? maybe it will pay off in the end after working hard for years and when the kids are grown (if nothing goes wrong like that judge old guy who found out kids never were his),
/r/MensRights18/09/24 11:21 AM
1

the desire to have children is both biological urges controlling you and indoctrination from society to control you and keep the wheels running. if you think from a logical standpoint: disadvantages and risks simply outweight any benefit. I guess some people think too much of what society would think of them and try to live by their standards prenuptial agreements are not bulletproof in western countries too. check your local laws before doing anything instead of getting advice from randoms.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 10:23 AM
3

write a book my friend hahaha
/r/MensRights17/09/24 06:31 PM
6

its not that they cant see it, they just dont want to see it. they want it to be men being privileged and them being the victim. if such narrative is accepted then they can protest and try to get more benefits by changing the law etc.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 06:30 PM
3

imagine knowing the "market" and still complying, how desperate. do not marry in this day and age. even check your laws before moving in together less they can force you to pay alimony or take your stuff by "common law marriage" depending on state/country.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 06:25 PM
11

both are exploited in different ways tbh, daughters do a lot of housework/cooking etc. and if they are older they take care of their younger siblings and sons are basically retirement plans. asian indoctrination of overly respecting older people and giving them resources is pretty brutal compared to the west
/r/MensRights17/09/24 06:17 PM
18

I do not understand what they are "mirroring" by sharing mutilated penises and laughing about it, or calling for mass murder of korean men. I do not think anyone is doing the same for korean women, so what are they even on about? they arent mirroring but going beyond that. This will most likely create the result of people who are being hated on and called for violence to doing the same back,
/r/MensRights07/09/24 06:54 PM
4

I suggest everyone to read the manipulated man and the rational male.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 12:02 PM
4

the comment about men being people just like women are and the reply it got made me think there really does seem to be an empathy gap towards the sexes. vast majority of society do not really care about what men are going through or how we suffer compared to what women are going through. for example homelessness: anyone remember the news talking about "1 out of 4 homeless is a woman" and how that is a big problem? or how there are multiple shelters for women and homeless shelters that take both …
/r/MensRights11/06/24 09:05 AM
8

then you got your test results, move accordingly.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:09 PM
19

1 in 3 paternity test come out as failure, they claim this is because the people who took the tests already had suspicion BUT they also do not want to make paternity tests mandatory so everyone can see what are the real numbers I wonder why? why did france ban it? "because it would cause public outrage" & "to uphold family peace through the country" or something I read. many men trusted blindly and raised someone elses and a cheaters kid through the history. if you believe she is the type to get…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:41 PM
18

because the cheaters also act outraged to pressure husband to not take the test in case it really isnt his. not saying there are no fool that gets offended but there are also many who ACT offended.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:38 PM
-3

Are there men who get addicted or "manipulated" into believing the sweet lies and spending to their last dime, then going into debt and having to pay most of their salary for years while getting beaten otherwise? yes. The only difference here is she is forced or coarced into prostitution. Both of these scenarios people are victims. I am not going to deny that society would call her a victim and cuddle her while looking at a man in the same scenario like he is a scum who wasted his family's money…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 09:14 AM
2

men going their own way. the belief is that chasing women and trying to date is simply not worth the time/resources invested, so they check out of the dating market. some fully go solo while others pay to pros or do sugar if they have money without being foolish enough to get attached or commit. "the only winning move is not to play."
/r/MensRights08/06/24 09:49 AM
1

if the only meaning or "true value in life" is having a woman and procreating, that is pretty sad. you are more than your primitive desires and instincts.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:33 PM
5

you will still be lonely with wrong people around, and that will be worse than being lonely by yourself. it is very rare these days but find a woman that hasnt been around the block and has good values that she can teach on your children. otherwise do not even bother. do not make decisions out of desperation that you will regret in the long run. not being married or not having children are not end of the world. it is better to adopt if you have the financial stability and time to look after them…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 12:58 PM
1

they say "biology" when it fits their agenda and say we are not just animals when it doesnt
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:03 AM
8

simps are sadder to me but honestly there is definitely a correlation.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 09:59 AM
5

same case with the rest of the society. how much do police or judges really care about how men have been abused or raped? many dont even believe that is possible. it has not been long before even laws only considered forceful penetration as rape and news could not say rape when women were the perpetrators
/r/MensRights09/05/24 09:57 AM
27

different form of "a real man" statements. "a real man pays for the dates" or more specific "a real man accepts his kids no matter if it is biological or not, she is still your wife and a real man knows when to take responsibility" (something along those lines I heard about a cheating wife bringing someone elses kid to this world lmao.) I guess "positive masculinity" is to always submit and do what your female overlords command.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 08:15 AM
2

but the tingles
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:21 PM
4

look what they do, not what they spout
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:20 PM
1

I never said or wished that, now you are creating an imaginary person in your mind as an enemy and self-deluding yourself into thinking that is the reality. go outside, touch some grass and take some fresh air. clear your mind from hatred of men and see the world for what it is not what you imagine it to be online
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:18 PM
1

what is even your state? how many natural areas with wild bears are in there? do they get regular visitations from hikers and the like or people do not enter those places regularly? no shit, black bears run from pets let alone humans. grizzly is 20 times more dangerous even though their numbers are tenth of black bears. so you went through my profile and read other arguments? you seem weirdly into this topic, I doubt it is good for your mental health. anyway you dont seem to be stable in the fir…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:06 PM
1

it is actually close to double sex offenders to how many wild bears are there in usa, but that is missing the point of "yearly". you are comparing lifetime registered offenders to yearly bear attacks which is pretty disingenuous but this is also not counting the robbings or assaults so who knows the real percentage, estimates dont mean shit when you disregard the false reports and the same people falsely accusing can continue to accuse over ten men until they are proven to be lying
/r/MensRights04/05/24 01:05 PM
2

yeah except when they are hungry, see you unaware/resting, it is mating season, there are cubs around and many more reasons can you give me the percentage of 100 bear encounters turning hostile and how many out of 100 random men in street attacking women? if you want to be delusional and paranoid you do you but dont spread misinformation
/r/MensRights03/05/24 01:43 PM
6

their argument is how many people get attacked by bears in wild yearly and how many men attack women dont worry about the difference in number of encounters, that would go against their delusional narrative. there are only dozens of attacks yearly but the chances of people meeting bears in the wild are just as low while meeting a random man is millions of times higher but either they are intellectually incapable of thinking this or intentionally disregarding reality. I would say just ask for a p…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 01:01 PM
3

that is just your incapability to understand statistics in the same case: I am safer with lions being close to me than women because I have seen and touched a lion before but never got attacked. dont ask how many times I have met a lion and how many women I have seen because its irrelevant right? that would disprove the narrative you need to know how many times people come close to a bear in wild, and how many times with random men every year. lets talk percentages
/r/MensRights03/05/24 12:45 PM
2

there is a difference between 1 or 2 well-written posts talking about why the argument is wrong, and seeing a different post saying the same thing every time I scroll through reddit. maybe talk it in their post and offer a counter argument so people who read it in bigger subs do see why they are wrong.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 10:27 AM
4

because I see a new post talking about this every time I scroll through reddit and have the same thought.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 10:20 AM
1

sorry for hijacking your comment, stop talking about man and bear question
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:53 AM
2

can you share the odds?
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:40 AM
2

that is true, but who is more likely? the reality is: we are pack animals. alone it is unlikely that we will survive for long. but on average men are more capable in such situations
/r/MensRights30/04/24 08:24 AM
28

yeah people who choose bear are either mentally incapable or want to take a jab at men. a better question is, taking men and bears out of equation: what percentage of women can survive a month all alone in wilderness? I doubt it will be in two digits.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 02:37 PM
12

and how many people or men have you come across while hiking, hunting and fishing? people directly assume the man in question will be aggressive for no reason while giving bear a more neutral possibility also what statistics are you talking about?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 02:31 PM
29

and not simply women taking desk jobs or cooking/cleaning in the base while men are the ones dying like ukraine
/r/MensRights27/04/24 07:36 PM
29

and high risk little reward sadly, marriage or commitment means nothing today and you stand to lose a lot
/r/MensRights26/04/24 01:16 PM
2

there is a sucker born every minute
/r/MensRights26/04/24 01:09 PM
4

thats just humans, the reason gambling has such a huge market is because people rather think about the good possibility rather than the bad. the person who buys lottery will buy it thinking about how their life will be amazing after winning, not losing. the difference is: if you lose lottery you will lose a few dollars, if you get divorced the consequences will be many times more expensive and much more than just financial
/r/MensRights20/04/24 10:22 AM
10

yeah, just dont be that sucker who will "settle down" with them and provide a life after they have been enjoying that single life till they are 30/40+. they dont really love you, its that they cant go around like they used to in their prime years
/r/MensRights20/04/24 10:15 AM
2

are you intentionally acting mentally handicapped? where in the whole text has that ever been said?
/r/MensRights20/04/24 10:12 AM
15

as I always said, simps caused the current dating market situation. if men did not pay for onlyf, do you think some "models" make millions? or if they didnt suck up to women irl, would they still have egos?
/r/MensRights20/04/24 10:10 AM
2

vetting better. this of course cant be done in one or two dates but getting to know her friends, her social media, past experiences and her hobbies etc. are very important. my advice would be to not get married in this modern age and focusing on yourself but if you want to, you are gambling with your life and the least you can do is minimalize the possibility
/r/MensRights16/04/24 12:08 PM
6

if you have to tell your woman to delete her fucking other people from her phone, it might be better to delete her from your life likewise if you need to tell her to not post her ass online or go to clubs etc. dont try to change them because forceful change is not real change only resentment
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:39 AM
18

they are absolutely coping that they could not do better. if they were top percent men and had options, do you think they would commit to a promiscuous woman and write on reddit about how her past doesnt matter?
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:35 AM
30

there is its called r/AITA and the like.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:32 AM
6

the guy from exhibit b only has himself to blame did you really commit to a woman who had fwb's and made multiple sex tapes with them? lol. lmao even.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:31 AM
2

you are evil and two faced, I doubt you care (about what they "possibly" went through or intentions) and say the same thing for a man who murdered their whole family hypocrite and pure evil
/r/MensRights14/04/24 01:41 PM
8

you are not very intelligent if you think they would blatantly say "yeah that is what we think" and dont try mental gymnastics to justify/make it look less or simply deflect dont get me wrong, I dont think women think they are superior or majority, but the ones that think like that would still not tell you lmao
/r/MensRights12/04/24 01:44 PM
5

the time is slowly coming for the average men to ditch society, then they will cry why no one is taking on hard and high mortality rate jobs or marrying just to slave away.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 01:42 PM
47

"their willingness to sacrifice themselves, to suffer detriment and carry burdens for the sake of the broader community will diminish." in the end they dont care about you, they care about how much you are willing to slave away for a system that hates you and will you sacrifice yourself for politicians and women. will you go to wars that has nothing to do with you and you didnt cause, and kill some other poor bastard that didnt have any connections or werent privileged to stay at home you will n…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 08:08 AM
13

it is pretty hard to avoid those for romantic relationships, the best you can do is observe and learn how to be a keen observer and people reader. even then everything can go downhill if one day she decides that "this is not working for me" around half of marriages today end in a failure and guess who mostly pays the price? date, dating is alright but do not get too attached, commit and invest unless you are %99 sure it is worth the risk
/r/MensRights13/03/24 04:47 PM
8

nordVPN should use this news as a commercial in germany
/r/MensRights13/03/24 04:37 PM
6

good thing men are not machines created to do specific tasks on command I wonder how would be the reaction if someone got mad at their wife for not being able to function when they are sick and said "wouldnt you get mad if dishwasher could not wash the dishes properly? or if laundry could not clean and made noises?"
/r/MensRights13/03/24 01:50 PM
31

"Would you say that every single country up to the last 100 years was sexist against men because they conscripted males for soldiers?" what the fuck is it if its not discrimination based on sex? do you even know the definition or are you hearing it for the first time?
/r/MensRights04/03/24 09:00 PM
7

or they are sharing the same men and in a harem unaware until it is late while deluding themselves lol
/r/MensRights04/03/24 08:55 PM
2

and there are people who live alone, do all the cooking/cleaning while working 12 hour shifts. remembering birthday/school etc. is not that hard and that video is cherry picked but regardless something being possible does not mean it is good. also what is your question? your reply is a statement, ending with a statement. not a question.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 08:53 PM
1

I do agree that not using anesthesia intentionally is cruel, but it is a necessary experiment to show the world why it should be required by law instead of a choice. Better would be to get rid of circumcision altogether. You do not know if the father consented to this, or if fathers opinion even matters in Canada when mother tells them to do so. Also no way board of medicine would let a study that would likely be help to ban or show harmful sides of circumcision, male vasectomy etc. be conducted…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 10:51 AM
1

" I was approached by a group of nurses who were attempting to organize a protest against male infant circumcision in Kingston General Hospital. They said that their observations indicated that babies undergoing the procedure were subjected to significant and inhumane levels of pain that subsequently adversely affected their behaviors." yes, they did conduct this research on one baby but it still proves that this can happen and many hospital staff had doubts&experiences enough to experiment.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 12:03 PM
20

And btw, my wife thinks my D looks incredible, all 8” of it. lmao, porn is not good for the brain. you should have the thinking capacity to understand that even if genital mutilation caused trauma and altered your brain functions as a baby, you would have no way of knowing the difference or noticing it right? saying "well I dont feel like theres a problem with my brain and look I have a wife who thinks my 8 inch cock looks great" is not really a good anecdotal argument
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:58 PM
3

I personally never read anything there before this post so I cant say there are no informative and good writers but the second article I saw is something like "beyond jealousy: cultivating polygamy" which doesnt sound great. My comment is mostly on the title.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:04 PM
12

the whole dogma about women hitting the wall at 30 is sort of silly not really first, every person is different and there are objectively beautiful women over 30 BUT they are not the norm. majority of women over 30 are not as attractive as the women in their 20s and they might have complications with pregnancy after that with differing times for each individual. hormonal problems and simply their past relationship traumas&baggage making them not a great company to have. I advise young men to wor…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 12:50 PM
66

it is nothing but a nicely covered "a real man is/does this and that" which women use to get what they want and shame/insult men that do not fit into their "this and that" "a real man would pay for the date" "a real man would pay for his womans rent" "a real/good man would accept a woman for her present no matter her past" which means I have a bad past but I want to shame you into ignoring it and et cetera. do not crumble under pressure and compromise your values and boundaries.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 12:39 PM
21

in my experience of working with majority women spaces, they talk way worse about their personal life and very detailed sex life for men we just say yeah we smashed it was nice but women go from how the guy smelled to how was his member etc. gossip for longer than the time they had sex lmao
/r/MensRights09/02/24 04:39 PM
13

when you hear generalization from women like "men are not loyal", "all men cheat" or sum, they think only about top 1 percent of men and rest dont count as men. but when they hit 30+ and dont get the same attention from the men they want, they come to "settle down" with you and you to provide and commit to them. do not be that sucker. if she would not look at you in her prime and your 20s when you were trying to figure out life, do not look at her seriously in your prime.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 04:33 PM
10

you are right, using protection and having back up plans is important just in case. and in case of pregnancy: do not forget to get paternity testing. 1 in 3 paternity test results are negative. the article made an assumption that the numbers might be lower for the whole population because these are the people who were already suspicious to take testing BUT I do not buy the 1 or 3 percent from feminists either. more realistic number would be 10-20% of men are raising some other mens children and …
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:08 PM
37

it is such a shitty deal to take when you built yourself be it financially, physically or mentally through hardwork in your twenties while she fucked around partying and riding that c0ck carousel, racking a bodycount of 50+ with all kinds of baggage and trauma (bonus points if she has baby daddies) now she is past her prime 30+. now she wants stability and for you to commit and provide for her. ready to "settle down" but would not look at you or reply to you when you were a struggling 20 yo and …
/r/MensRights26/01/24 01:33 PM
–

yep, you definitely did misunderstand. I dont think you have the mental capacity to understand even if I dumbed down what I am saying, comprehension problems is common these days so dont worry too much. goodbye
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 01:49 PM
-2

I think you are misunderstanding the post, of course getting the opinions of your close friends or relatives about your potential partner is important and so is social skills but the social proof we are talking about here is when women give more attention to the guy with a ring on his finger or with a female friend in a bar. also nobody is trying to glorify "having an instant boner when you see a pair of tits"? are you schizo? the more accurate comparison to your "tight waist and a wide ass" wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 06:43 PM
2

I see your points and agree with some of them but some I dont. "settling down type" but this happens with the "bad boy" persona of red pill too? they have female friends just as wingmen for this reason and give such advice while having no intention of settling down or committing. open sourcing the vetting is good if you have a lack of time but might not be accurate representation of who they really are and even get misinformed. vetting yourself and having your own opinion on their behaviors and …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 05:07 PM
1

I have guy friends who won’t date women because they’re afraid of what their friends will say about her looks. I am curious now, what is wrong with their looks? are they ugly? dressed like a street walkers? is this really an example of social proofing?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 04:33 PM
2

persuasion do you have a book or other study material recommendation?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:37 PM
3

jesus fucking christ, theres a difference between innate biological urges/emotions and caring about what other people say or follow others. if we go with your example then finding puppies cute are also not by our free will lmao. define free will to me
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:08 PM
0

theres also a study claiming that women tend to read more violent erotic literature with distasteful topics compared to men and get aroused more its not really a good idea to draw conclusions based on porn researches.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 01:47 PM
3

It's the same argument as a woman who says "How can a man be sexually attracted to a pair of tits or a nice round ass without knowing anything about the person they are attached to? Are men stupid? Are men animals? Are men incapable of using their brains?" physical attraction is nothing but sexual. better equivalent for this would be "why do women like sharp jawlines/height" not this social phenomena. I dont think men have an accurate comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 01:44 PM
1

A history of failed short term relationships is NOT a sign to be a good long term relationship partner for neither sex. did I say otherwise? I think you misunderstood the topic here. I am talking about attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 01:38 PM
-4

I dont think the numbers are as high though, how many men do you think feel the need to see an attractive women with other guys to feel attracted to her? on the other side, it can be detrimental to have a reputation of having been with too many guys or "other men already having her selected" in the past but where are they now? most men in my experience would prefer a virgin instead of someone with 20 past relationships while the reverse is true for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 12:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter