TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gentrfam Archive

View 0 posts and 10 comments by gentrfam on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

That's a JNOV, you Cooley-drop-out!
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 02:40 PM
5

And in what world can you JMOL after the jury has decided some, but not all, factual issues?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 01:56 PM
5

That was quoted from the non-deadly force self-defense jury instructions. So, non-deadly force still allows the jury to compare the 200 lb man to the 100 lb woman. No JMOL for you.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 01:22 PM
7

Notice how: there is NOTHING in american law that limits a victim of violence to any sort of proportional response. became: juries do not render verdicts based on anything other than jury instructions prescribed by statute or the state's highest court.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 01:41 AM
7

this is why when you get a concealed weapons permit, the officers literally go through the defense statutes of your state and give examples. Is this where you got your legal "knowledge?" God, I hate lawyers whose law degree comes from concealed carry class more than Google-lawyers!
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 01:38 AM
7

Jury Instructions from Florida, read in all cases: In considering the issue of self-defense, you may take into account the relative physical abilities and capacities of the defendant and (victim). 200 lb man versus 100 pound woman - the jury can take that into account.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 01:37 AM
4

Self-defense also doesn't mean a free slap-back. Self-defense is only appropriate if there is a threat of imminent additional harm. Florida Jury Instructions: (Defendant) was justified in [using] [or] [threatening to use] non-deadly force against (victim) and had no duty to retreat if [he] [she] reasonably believed that such conduct was necessary to defend [himself] [herself] [another] against (victim’s) imminent use of unlawful force.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 01:35 AM
5

I love the stealth edits. Suddenly, responding to non-deadly force with "even kill you," becomes an unintentional death caused by non-deadly force. Did you find your copy of the BarBri prep material?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 01:12 AM
7

"...or even kill you..." That is deadly force. Note, also, grievous bodily harm. You can't cause grievous bodily harm in response to a slap, either. Slap = non-deadly force. I'm sorry you're such a dumbass. Maybe buy yourself a copy of Andrew Branca's Law of Self Defense: The Indispensible Guide for the Armed Citizen. https://www.amazon.com/Law-Self-Defense-Indispensable-Citizen/dp/0988867702 Chapter 4: "Element 3: Proportionality."
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 01:02 AM
11

Passed the bar in three different states. If you think that killing someone in response to being slapped will be self defense, you're on your way to a disbarment or a murder charge. Look up "imperfect self defense."
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 12:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter