TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

genuinemra Archive

View 9 posts and 683 comments by genuinemra on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-16

How should I know. Any sort of accomplishment is nothing to sneeze at.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 11:47 PM
-21

This is a good start! We've accomplished twos of things so far!
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:46 PM
1

THE MOST DISCRIMINATORY LEGISLATION EVAR. Nope. Not even close.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:19 PM
3

Ever hear of Jim Crow. Hyperbole much?
/r/MensRights28/06/12 04:03 PM
-4

I have mixed feelings about this. I am assuming Roberts upheld it as to prevent single-payer.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 03:51 PM
4

Why doesn't he just put her in the figure 4? WOOOO!
/r/MensRights28/06/12 03:41 PM
0

Before you get bent out of shape, actually read the piece in its entirety - he talks about how double-standards go both ways. I esp. liked #6.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 03:04 PM
-4

She is a noted antifeminist writer, FYI, so not particularly a surprising or evocative article.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 01:47 PM
-3

Are you supposed to be an MRA? How cute.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 11:42 AM
-7

Suck that dick. SUCK IT!
/r/MensRights28/06/12 01:34 AM
5

Am I the only one who is glad that marriage as an institution is being drestroyed?
/r/MensRights27/06/12 09:17 PM
6

Another 42 percent of women answered maybe when asked about the possibility of dating an unemployed man. That answer, however, came with the stipulation that those women would not want to spend a lot of time in the relationship if the man did not have a plan in place. Just 21 percent of women said they would date an unemployed man. I see nothing wrong with this. I wouldn't to date an unemployed woman, unless maybe she was in school or something still.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 07:20 PM
1

Your second point is very true - don't we get angry when people cast a suspicious eye on men mentoring boys or teaching kids or being with their kids at public parks?
/r/MensRights27/06/12 06:35 PM
-4

People automatically downvote anything I say as a matter of course.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 05:36 PM
-1

Celda thinks gambling is not immoral, but lots of people do. Gambling is legal (many places) and illegal (other places), and is mostly a legitimate means of making money. Therefore Celda is the ultimate authority on what is moral, what is legal (even when it's not) and therefore who deserves their money. I see now. All makes sense, thanks!
/r/MensRights27/06/12 04:34 PM
1

And all trolls are trolls. Also - Rate limited? Niiiice, MR mods. +300 to 64 in just 3 days too. Great community.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 04:23 PM
-6

men should be paid more than women at tennis tournaments. Maybe I am mistaken, but I thought this was already the case.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 04:12 PM
1

Charges will likely be lowered to something else and you know it. The fact that women can be abusive to men doesn't suddenly make it okay for men to start throwing shit at their stepdaughters' faces.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 01:53 PM
0

Isn't 16 the age of consent in most US states?
/r/MensRights27/06/12 01:50 PM
2

I think a lot of apartments will let renters out of their lease if they are divorcing. Check your state's laws regarding this. How long have you been married? Is there any compelling reason why she cannot work? Not to be harsh, and I think it's commendable that you don't want to throw her out on her ass, but being that you are barely getting by as it is, being that she is not staying out of the workforce for reasons related to child upbringing or anything else (going by what you've said), there …
/r/MensRights27/06/12 01:46 PM
-8

Of course she is guilty too. There is no crime out there that women can't and shouldn't be blamed for, particularly with relation to her husband's sex crimes.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 01:40 PM
-2

I have no doubt you truly care about poor black men rotting in prison. That said, I was simply asking whether the prosecutor acted illegally by not disclosing during discovery to the defense. You didn't answer, and instead linked to a 100% irrelevant comment I made about Christina Hoff Sommers. Good for you.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 01:39 PM
0

So gambling is immoral? Gamblers who win don't deserve their money? Even though it's perfectly legitimate, i.e., legal, in many places? Your arguments surrounding the whole thing, as to who "deserves" money and who does not are very dubious, and are essentially "because I said so." Sorry, but that doesn't make the cut.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 01:37 PM
-1

1) This isn't between us. 2) Who the fuck are you to say someone "deserves" money or not? CEOs and all sorts of millionaires whose lives have been enriched around dicking over us little guys - do they deserve their millions? Why? How did they earn it? How do you even determine that? And a partnership between two people that lasted a decade and a half? How do you determine that? Truck question - you don't. You just bitch about what a golddigger some woman is on a web site.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 10:15 PM
-2

Celda, I have long since written you off as sad and dishonest. You are an abomination of a moderator, for sure. My actual argument was that prostitutes are, to some people, immoral, and to all people (save some other parts of the world) illegitimate. Those were the ground rules you were setting for someone deserving income or not. You then tried to argue that illegitimate != illegal, which it factually and absolutely does, thereby dissolving your whole fallacious argument. The end.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 10:10 PM
0

LOL u think Obama is a leftist. I think I just pissed my jeans.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 10:07 PM
-7

Can you clarify the post? Does the detective have any culpability to notify an alleged criminal that someone accusing them of a crime has a history of accusing others of the same crime? Wouldn't that all come out in discovery?
/r/MensRights26/06/12 10:04 PM
-1

You are trying to tell me that police unions are leftist organizations? LOL nope.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 08:16 PM
-2

Celda, I'd continue this but quite honestly, I think you say what you want and form a stubborn and bullshit line of thinking that would in no way be swayed by any thoughtful argument I put forth. I also see prostitution as not immoral, but it is absolutely, de facto illegitimate. It's in the fucking definition: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illegitimate
/r/MensRights26/06/12 08:15 PM
-4

No shit, that is the point I was trying to make - that it can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the wife knew it was erotica. And I guess the OP is saying that anything purchased at some sexy shit party with the girls won't be used on/with him? Bullshit. You think his wife is gonna just use strawberry lube and candles for herself?
/r/MensRights26/06/12 01:04 AM
-2

So prostitutes, who earn money themselves through illegetimate and dubiously moral means don't deserve the money they work for?
/r/MensRights26/06/12 01:02 AM
-6

Logic don't gewd.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 01:01 AM
-1

Redditor for 8 days claims to be a security guard who spoke to a man who claimed to have been bitten in the penis by a woman who claimed said fictitious man hit her and choked her. This is what we're going by now, guys?
/r/MensRights26/06/12 12:54 AM
-22

She gets the vitrol because she is human garbage.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 12:50 AM
0

Why the fuck did anyone downvote this comment?
/r/MensRights26/06/12 12:47 AM
0

Except for false rape allegations.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 11:14 PM
-2

FYI if you actually look at the site it seems as though they are talking specifically about women in developing nations. I don't see reason for the butthurt.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 11:13 PM
0

This is a blatant falsehood. The left has long been supportive of prison reforms, including anti-rape measures and false-conviction activism.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 11:07 PM
-2

The majority? A large percentage? Are those from-your-ass numbers?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 11:06 PM
-1

It is truly unbelievable that you are a moderator considering how condescending and hostile you are to oppositional viewpoints.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 11:04 PM
-5

Why does he deserve it? Because he is handsome and makes even more money for people even richer than him? If you ask me, people who wipe the bedriddens' asses day in and day out deserve that money, not people who are good-looking and charming on film.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 11:02 PM
-7

More deserving than his children and his children's mother?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 10:59 PM
-13

I don't think it's hypocritical, exactly. That would require a 1:1 comparison, and porn/softcore != sex toys and a wildly popular novel. Sex toys are probably going to be used with/on you, whereas looking at porn/softcore and pleasuring yourself to it excludes her. Considering the book was in fact Twilight fanfiction, your wife probably isn't lying in not knowing about its subject matter. Regardless, I don't think any of it should be an issue, and I don't really see what your story has to do wit…
/r/MensRights25/06/12 10:53 PM
7

So she is 15 and you are 18. Meaning she was 14 when she got pregnant by you, a then 17-year-old. Depends on the state, but she was likely below the age of consent. Your 15-year-old girlfriend is not a woman. She's a girl. You're barely a man. It sounds like you are both too immature to have a child. Hopefully you have some older relatives who can guide you on the process of getting property custody or visitation of your son.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 09:25 PM
-1

Didn't General Motors attempt to do this to Ralph Nader at some point?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 09:17 PM
-1

Oh, I see. Pajama's Media, notoriously biased, took a remark grossly out of context, made an internet post about it, and gave it an inflamatory headline. NBD.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 09:16 PM
0

Pajama's Media isn't the best source for unbiased news.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 01:12 PM
-9

Why do you feel the need to go to women's subreddits and crosspost here? Does it make you feel like a big smart man?
/r/MensRights22/06/12 04:50 PM
2

I share many of your sentiments and therefore urge you to hang around and make your voice heard. Maybe one day it will drown out the nonsense that is sometimes posted here.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 04:48 PM
0

Ah, okay. Well like I said, it may really be out of your hands, your mom's hands, or your dad's hands. It could be an extremely old past-due type thing that is just now being collected upon. Good luck, no matter what course of action is taken.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 04:35 PM
-4

Oh, an anti-choicer, I see. Automatic downvotes for you until infinity. Honest arguments and intellectual integrity are not your strong ponts.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:42 AM
0

It may be out of your, your sister's or your mom's hands. Is the back CS for you and your sister or another child he has?
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:40 AM
-1

Didn't MC Hammer go bankrupt?
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:39 AM
0

Condoms are available OTC, cheaply or free, without a medical examintation. Of course insurance/prescription coverage shouldn't cover condoms.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:38 AM
1

I think you're full of shit, dude. I am perfectly fine with boner pills being covered for men, but please don't act like they are somehow moral while contraceptives are amoral slut pills. Controlling fertility is very important for both men and women. Contraceptive coverage is important for both men and women.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:36 AM
0

The author of the piece seems to be anti-circ and view it as molestation, even if its intent isn't sexual.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:33 AM
-2

She already has an open case DSS is investigating for child abuse (although it really wasnt her it was her X-Fiance). Could you clarify this? Why do you have a problem with your wife going to school and/or working outside the home? She doesn't need your permission for either, and in the long run it will likely benefit you both. She complains about cleaning? Really? Big fucking deal. There is nothing wrong with her not having motherly instincts and not wanting babies, although it is quite regrett…
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:31 AM
-3

I would agree with your criticism, if not for the "women have no agency" part. Are you really suggesting that someone in an abusive situation (man or women) is simply not exercising their "agency" to escape their abuse? If so, you are sorely simple-minded and misinformed.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:20 AM
7

I believe one of the FAQs or guidelines to posting here is no memes.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:18 AM
-2

schools require you own a residence in the area to actually enroll in their school As a sweeping statement, this is wholly untrue.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 10:29 PM
-2

Men benefit financially from women opting out of the workforce. If you want to advocate for more stay-at-home fathers, fathers demanding more flexible hours and workplaces, and pay cuts in order to spend more time with their kids, you won't see me arguing.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 10:28 PM
-5

Better education, probably. Social retard, likely.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 10:23 PM
-3

It really never ceases to amaze me how much home school advocates get their feelings hurt when someone dares criticizes it. Would you like me to place qualifiers in there to make you feel better? "Home schooling is really really bad and done by fundamentalist religious people and fundamentalist granolaheads but sometimes it's okay to be homeschooled if you might get shot, assaulted, or bullied." Better?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:29 PM
-4

Public school education varies according to location and income in the area. Where I grew up, they were great. Where I live now, I have heard they are inconsistent and mostly terrible. I take that with a grain of salt, however, because that is coming from hipster mothers that breastfed for far too long and think that teaching children to read and do math is too much pressure.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:26 PM
1

Everyone hates a realist.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:22 PM
-3

I've never heard a feminist actually claim that, just mainstream media.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:21 PM
6

Wow. What a terrible way to begin a "book review."
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:31 PM
2

I would say this is my greatest problem with MR as a whole - that all in all, it is largely reactionary against feminism instead of proactive with regard to boys' and men's rights.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:01 PM
1

Not only that, but look at the boys who are molested by adults and who internalize that as somehow being their fault.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:00 PM
0

That's...the point.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 07:59 PM
-4

From what I gather, she doesn't have any sons. There are other issues of bodily autonomy related to MR than circumcision, though, FYI.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 07:58 PM
3

It seems like that on this site a lot of times the focus is on...honing in on women and the bad things they do or sometimes do...rather than truly being about men's issues and boy's issues. At least that is what I've noticed after a few months of lurking/using.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 07:15 PM
0

You're clearly racist, yes.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:55 PM
-2

I don't think you know what the word "ironic" means. Not running away or isolating, just trying to get things back on topic. Start a thread elsewhere on the merits of homeschooling (or here if you can relate it to MR) and I'll gladly continue.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:54 PM
-1

But...there are men who do. Are you saying you take issue with the fact that she acknowledges these men exist (the brutish asshole protester types), or that she doesn't acknowledge that some men, while supportive, still grieve abortion?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:52 PM
-1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackface Still in really bad taste, dude.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:51 PM
1

How do you know he wasn't coerced? You're only getting her side of things. (But yes, this shit is made up anyway so doesn't matter.)
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:50 PM
-2

1) Sounds very troll-ish and like it didn't happen. 2) Would you be posting it here if the genders were reversed? My guess is you would not, and you would be calling the victim a crazy liar and a tease. 3) Sounds like a rapist to me - maybe not legally, I guess, but if you're being intimate with someone and have to stop several times to get reassurances because it doesn't feel like they want to, you should just stop, period. 4) Who the fuck says a joking "I hate you" in foreplay? The whole thing…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:47 PM
-4

And that we are rewarded handsomely for choosing our careers over our families. I know this will be unpopular to say, but a large part of the wage gap (which has been referred to as a myth here) is women opting out/delaying/pausing careers, and as men we as a whole benefit from this.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:42 PM
0

Why do you take issue with that? Have you ever been in front of a clinic? I am sure it varies city to city and depends on your region, but that kind of rhetoric absolutely does happen here, and has gotten so bad that the feds have had to get involved.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:39 PM
-3

What?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:37 PM
1

So by "all supporting each other" you mean everyone supporting you, right? How did you get in arrears in the first place? Not trying to be a dick, but you mention on your site building a new house and doing all kinds of awesome shit, so I'm wondering why you're coming here for donations. (P.S. could have really stood a warning for a nudie pic of you.)
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:36 PM
-7

Oh, the hell it doesn't. And what a good lesson to teach your children - instead of learning to live with/confront various bullshit, it is better to run away from it and isolate. It's one thing to pull a kid out of school who is being bullied, harrassed, assaulted, etc., mercilessly without any action from the administration. It's another to preemptively forego the school experience in order to shelter them based on your fucked up experiences. At any rate, I have derailed this post and do apolog…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:30 PM
-1

As I recall, I wasn't speaking to you, was I? Seems like you're the one concern trolling to me. Wavegeek is a big boy.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:26 PM
-10

I respectfully disagree. I think it's weaksauce for religious fundamentalists and affluent white hippies who can't bear to think of sullying their kids in public schools where they have black people and grades and shit. That's glaringly off topic, though, so I'll just leave it at that.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:25 PM
0

Ok. Did you just post a comic that someone drew of someone else in blackface? Sure looks like it to me.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:23 PM
-2

My advice to be to go forward leading your life the way you want it to be led, and strive for the best results possible. Do not get caught up in blaming women and/or minorities for any failures or bumps you may encounter on the way. If you are academically able enough, personable enough, hard-working enough, and can afford the tuition, you will be able to get your M.D. Your Ph.D. in Biology entails different coursework and other expectations, and I'd guess is a little bit more competitive as you…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:29 PM
0

Cool thanks.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:26 PM
7

You make a valid point, I hadn't thought of that. I have a lot of friends who are anti-vaccers and it disgusts me. I've always said any area where hippie shit blends with extreme Christian shit is bad news. Home schooling. Vaccines. Birth control. You name it.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:25 PM
1

I'm a leftist and I sadly do see it as very partisan/right-leaning.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:24 PM
-2

According to your script. And the discredited Hayek's.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:22 PM
-1

That's racist.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:20 PM
-1

That sounds familiar...
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:19 PM
-6

Buzz off dude. I'm betting you haven't given one red cent to the BB documentary.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:17 PM
7

No shit. Can no one else ever give anything to some sort of cause they believe in ever again because Brian Banks? Get real. (I also love the tacit victim-blaming of she LET the abuse happen. What the fuck is she going to do? Tell them to fuck off and drive the bus themselves?)
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:14 PM
3

Yes, you are wrong. Admissions are 100% based on qualifications, especially considering how competitive medschool programs are. The medical school where I live is majority male, though it is close to 50/50, and majority (80%) white.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:11 PM
-7

You're basing your outlook on life on what sophomore chemistry student said to you? Ok then.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:08 PM
-3

I don't want no Obamacare in my nutsack.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:07 PM
12

That's SUPERNINTENDO CHALMERS!!!
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:05 PM
0

I don't understand what the title has to do with this submission.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:00 PM
-1

Did you just draw someone in blackface?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 01:58 PM
1

Because blood justice is superior to legal justice, I suppose...
/r/MensRights20/06/12 08:26 PM
0

Sorry, I don't buy that and don't advocate doxxing or taking the law into your own hands when the desired outcome isn't granted. It's a stupid, petty website. Luckily it is so stupid that it hopefully wont' become dangerous. You are clearly not operating on anywhere near the same framework as me when you cannot differentiate between sex offender registries, which put forth public information about CONVICTED criminals, and a site that is no better than something like dontdatehimgirl.com.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 07:46 PM
0

I wasn't aware that they put people not convicted of crimes on the registry. Clearly I was mistaken, as they will just put anyone on there that gets their goat, with no oversight whatsoever, just like Register-Her.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 07:34 PM
-3

If you read the paper, she defines patriarchy in the very beginning. The definition that you present is not the one the study's author presents. She also repeatedly states that her results are correlative, not causal. I think the OP takes a lot of liberties in drawing the conclusions he draws, none of which are actually found in the study. He seems more interested in outright dismissing the study because it uses the word "patriarchy" then he does actually examining it. In fact, the study itself …
/r/MensRights20/06/12 06:25 PM
-11

How about instead of mocking the study, you take a deeper look at it? Doesn't it make sense to you that more oppressive societies, overall, would have lower-age mortality across the board?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:56 PM
1

P-U. What's that smell? A troll? Couldn't be!
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:44 PM
11

For posterity, BiggerBenFranklin posted a comment (and a thread defending said comment) alleging that while IAMAWHITEMALEAMA (surely a troll) may not "get sex" that he can still "get sex" by rape or prostitution. He then ninja-deleted his bullshit and accused me as being a SRS troll. Hot news everyone: Just because I don't advocate rape or think jokingly urging someone to rape is a cute little matter of semantics, nor do I think that makes me an SRS user. Screenshot is here: http://i.imgur.com/D…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:13 PM
0

Yes. I really like how you fuss around with qualifiers that rare shouldn't even really be an option. It's not a semantics thing, and I doubt very seriously you even know what the word "semantics" means. It does not mean "saying stupid shit and thinking I can get away with it because I say semantics," I can tell you that.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:00 PM
1

There seem to be a lot of things that have been left out of the report due to privacy/family court related issues. I don't think that's biased reporting. It is likely only being reported in the first case b/c the man came forward to the news channel. Regardless, I do hope he is able to get his children in the end. Weight should not be a determining factor as to their worth as a parent.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:59 PM
4

What the fuck dude.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:56 PM
1

If the father specifically did not have custody for cause, however, it wouldn't have been automatic.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:52 PM
0

Good luck. I'm sure your friend never could have predicted such workplace repurcussions. Perhaps he can take this opportunity to find another job.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:51 PM
-1

And that post has fuckall to do with 1) demonization of men and 2) examination of sexual assault within the prison-industrial complex how? Yeah, that's what I thought. Thanks for tagging and saving all my posts, though. I'm truly flattered!
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:51 PM
3

The article says the mother was the primary custodian until she had a mental breakdown and possible OD. He hasn't seen them in a year (maybe since the ex's breakdown???) which is unconscionable. Other than that, it's really hard to say, since he has evidently had past legal issues.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:24 PM
3

I feel like this isn't really the place to hash out your personal vendettas from other subreddits.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:10 PM
2

That is truly fucked up and discriminatory, but it also mentions that it's just one of the reasons he's not yet been awarded custody. They don't go into the other details but do mention in passing he's made death threats and had trouble with the law. If they determine he is a fit parent, he is fit no matter if he weighs 150 LBS or 400 LBS.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:08 PM
3

Wow. For a MISDEMEANOR? How did his employer even find out? It sounds very unlikely to me that it's a state statute and not simply and HR policy. Wish I had more advice to give. At the very least, he could apply for and hopefully draw unemployment until this is resolved.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:05 PM
2

Just a reminder that slavery still happens today, and it is not just women and girls that are victims.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 02:18 PM
0

It's truly just a statistical-gathering measure. No need to fill them out unless you just want to.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 02:15 PM
0

Why didn't you just live the auto-title in the text field when you submitted the link? The "princess" bit seems highly unnecessary editorialization.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 02:14 PM
-1

It would be helpful if we knew what the original post that you made to your friend's page was.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 02:09 PM
1

I first read that as r/babydumps and I was like, "Yeah that sounds about right."
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:39 PM
-6

I'm not rehashing it here. I think it's sufficient enough to say that, had I known she or you would be asked to contribute in some prize capacity on the basis of my dollars spent, I would have rethought my donation.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:38 PM
-2

You mean like Manboobz and that other guy...Hugo something?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:37 PM
1

So by that charge, "what causes women to divorce," or "what causes women to sexually assault minors" means only/all women initiate divorce and only/all women sexually assault minors. Actually, no, but they are the majority. I am sure you wouldn't have a problem with implying that, though.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:36 PM
-1

Actually, I'm identifying with the son, but thanks for trying to tell me what I think, nonetheless.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:34 PM
-1

LOL
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:34 PM
0

No, Tamen. I do not "harp on prison rape" as "only male on male." I have asserted that it is largely male-on-male (as is most violent crime, btw) and the MRM community has largely ignored this fact, while I think it should be openly addressed.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:34 PM
0

What interest do I have in the demonization of men, as an MRA? I have heard others agree with this before, but are too scared to speak (see the 70+ downvotes I've received in the last 12 hours).
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:32 PM
-1

How do you come to the conclusion that men who are raped in prison are not raped by other men? Of course they are not all raped by other men, but mostly.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:31 PM
0

Register-Her is a doxing site meant to intimidate and harrass. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:30 PM
-1

Nope. Try again.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:30 PM
-10

You're clearly trolling. This is the last I'll respond to you. If you are unable to differentiate b/w rapists and rape victims, then there's nothing I can do to settle your mind.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:02 AM
-10

So now you're deliberately missing any point I was trying to make? Keep it classy.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:01 AM
-4

That's an extremely large assumption you make there, Steven. Again, I am not calling for the head of the unnamed father, but I do question whether or not he might have been charged with manslaughter had the victim not been so dispicable.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:00 AM
-7

Oh, I can see a thread on "what causes men to rape" going over like a lead balloon here.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:58 AM
-6

Why should perpetrators be ignored? Why is the MRM wholly unconcerned with male perpetrators of violence, be it sexual violence against other men or physical violence against other men? Why is that a taboo discussion here? It's an elephant in the room, and I'm supposed to sit here and pretend I don't smell it.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:57 AM
-4

It's my understanding that manslaughter in TX doesn't require intent. The article the OP links in this thread states that the father pulled the assailant off his daughter - stopping the assault upon her - and then separately began beating him.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:55 AM
-6

Men raping men is a symptom of prisons brutalizing people? Now, prisons ignoring men raping men is a problem. And prisons operating in a culture where rape is expected and acceptable is a problem. But as far as I'm concerned, men raping men is a problem, not a symptom.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:54 AM
-9

Oooh. Chomsky. You must be very smart. (Or are you arguing that the man was beaten to death without much of an afterthought to it by the prosecutor because he was latino?)
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:52 AM
-1

The article stated that he pulled the man off his daughter (i.e., stopped the man from raping or molesting her) then issued the beatdown. That is not defense.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:49 AM
-6

A world where men rape men? I bring this up not to be flip, but to request that, in noting that men constitute the majority of rape victims in the US, we must also acknowledge that men constitute the majority of rapists in the US. It is the same with men on men non-sexual violence in general. It is an indisputible fact, but to talk about it here openly is a big no-no.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:48 AM
-9

And what sex might those prisoners be?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:46 AM
1

Interesting concept, but it seems to be speaking to one vary narrow demographic. I'm interested to know - do you interview all different ages/races of men (or intend to) for this, or will it mainly document your travels and adventures as you seek to learn what it means to be a man? Thank you, and I am thrilled to be seeing so many worthy kickstarters here lately.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:45 AM
-14

Yes. I can think of no person so qualified to speak on being a young African-American jailed due to a false conviction than a white woman. I've made it very clear my feelings towards GWW in the MRM, and I certainly didn't donate my pittance with the knowledge that doing so would allow her another platform.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:39 AM
-11

So if men comprise the majority of rape victims in the US due to the frequency of prison rape, then who comprises the majority of rapists?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:36 AM
-4

Yes how very antithetical to the MRM to believe that, in the USA, a man is entitled to a fair trial and not retributive street justice. How dare I.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:33 AM
-8

So he pulled the man off his daughter, then pummelled him with his fists? You mean his beating of this man was not integral to also stopping the molesting? Another win for TX justice.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:32 AM
0

I think there are many topics we all "agree to disagree" on. For instance, I strongly oppose the concept of "financial abortion." Perhaps it's a bad argument, but I often feel that "no true MRA" is truly hostile toward flexible gender expectations. Maybe that is naive of me. I support the choice for men and women to do whatever they want to do, be it work outside the home, work from home, go to school, parent, etc. I've never heard anyone speaking of porn/prostitution as being an unfair advantag…
/r/MensRights19/06/12 10:22 PM
4

Man, I've been there. I was in mental hospitals twice the year before last, and I know that getting the medication and therapeutic regiment sorted out is really fucking difficult. All I can say is to keep trying different things and combinations of meds and perhaps, if you can, a second opinion on your psychiatric diagnosis just to be sure. Also, have you ever been to a group therapy setting? Even though I do one on one now (and just ever 4-8 weeks) I found group, when things were hardest, to be…
/r/MensRights19/06/12 10:14 PM
0

Repost: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/va1bt/single_dads_by_choice_more_men_going_it_alone_npr/
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:03 PM
1

Repost: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/va1bt/single_dads_by_choice_more_men_going_it_alone_npr/
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:02 PM
-5

The mother may be petty, that does not mean the father has to stoop to that level as well.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:01 PM
0

I was never aware that a double standard existed. I take lots of pictures and have since high school, and believe me they are by no means artsy, just for making memories of my friends and family and places I've visited.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 08:02 PM
0

FYI, he said a 4-figure sum. I did miss the part about him being in the UK.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:59 PM
-6

This video was already posted here a day or two ago, FYI.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:34 PM
3

I don't think that's what is really of consequence in this scenario.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:26 PM
0

I'd say a little of column A a little of column B. I think parents go completely over-the-top for such events, but then they have set that expectation for their kids and others, so it becomes self-fulfilling. I had one party at McDonalds for my 5th b-day, the rest were family only (maybe a few neighbor kids) and cake from a mix, frosting from a can.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:24 PM
0

I thought about this after I typed it, and it occurred to me that maybe it wouldn't be fair to put the kid in the middle of a disagreement with the mother after all. For some reason, I'm wondering if this is a Bar Mitzvah and if the child would be old enough to have some decision as to how he'd like to have the money spent - either on the party, or a car in the future, money for a trip, etc.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:22 PM
0

You did make a mistake, and you should edit your post, or delete it.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:18 PM
8

Tell me I'm not the only one that understands that the wife may have some trust issues after he consistently lied to her for 4+ years.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:14 PM
6

My advice would be to seek professional help - depression (as a disease) runs much deeper than anything having to do with "male disposability" or any other MRA-speak. If you're able to, locate a recommended therapist and psychiatrist in your area. They should be able to do a full panel of diagnostic tests to see what you are facing. From there, you will jointly develop a treatment plan, whether it is simply seeing one of them every few weeks (or maybe more often at first) or if inpatient or exte…
/r/MensRights19/06/12 05:33 PM
3

Actionally, no one elses's body belongs to you. Even an infant son.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 05:30 PM
-4

I think it's wrong for any alleged criminal to face repercussion from anyone other than the criminal justice system. This includes doxxing false accusers or issuing "street justice" (i.e., brutally beating) men accused of rape or sexual assault.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 03:11 PM
-3

If the "false accuser" has not been convicted of anything, then it's not apples to oranges. I oppose doxxing. Nothing you say will make me change my mind.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 03:03 PM
-3

I guess if you want to stoop to the level of Don't Date Him Girl and other similar sites. I would prefer not to.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:58 PM
-3

I don't think it's his or anyone's place to dox someone. It lends very little crediblity when MRAs say things like "the media sets out to ruin men's lives if they are accused of rape, abuse, etc."
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:35 PM
0

I didn't really think so, but I have no control over other people's downvotes. I get the impression that sometimes people see a comment they don't like or don't agree with (rather than just a bad, off-topic, unhelpful, or trolling comment) and downvote en masse.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:33 PM
-1

What's he supposed to do? Let law enforcement handle it and not take it into his own hands, IMO.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:21 PM
1

Well this is probably not the first time you are wrong about something, Hardwarequestions. If you look at my comment history you can pretty clearly see I am not a troll and do not mock MRAs.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:20 PM
5

Give the money straight to your kid, then, instead. I don't know, I really don't think it's fair to be punishing your child for something you're angry with your ex about. (Of course, I also think it's fucking stupid to spend thousands of dollars on a kid's party anyway.) Maybe you could talk to your kid and ask if he'd rather have the $ or rather you put it to a kick-ass party. It's about him, remember, not her.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:17 PM
2

Yes. Because gay men don't rape or get rape or get accused of rape. Great idea.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:14 PM
-3

So this sub now promotes doxxing?
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:13 PM
2

Didn't this happen months ago?
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:07 PM
1

I highly doubt that she'd be able to take you to court for the extra money. However, why would you retaliate/punish your son for his mother's actions? It sounds like you're being just as petty as she is.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:03 PM
1

Your comment makes no sense.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:01 PM
2

Your loss, idiot.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:00 PM
8

Very generous. Donating now.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 12:13 AM
2

FYI, not a guy: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/v7qcv/whats_a_secret_you_know_about_someone_that_they/c5246p9
/r/MensRights19/06/12 12:12 AM
1

It was my understanding from reading it that they still have a relationship from their biological father, hence adoption probably wouldn't be on the table. And I'm very sure you're worried about the children being "robbed."
/r/MensRights18/06/12 11:07 PM
1

I don't disagree with you, but in all likelihood, he has no legal standing in relation to the children, and they are not his children.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 10:58 PM
-3

I really like Jay Smooth's radio show. Wasn't aware he did video stuff too, thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 10:55 PM
1

Oh, I wasn't saying you didn't, just that it is to your benefit (as well as your ex's) to have a formalized arrangement in place. This will protect you in the case where she might say you haven't been paying, etc. (Though hopefully that would never happen.)
/r/MensRights18/06/12 10:50 PM
0

Lol, it's like they're not even trying!
/r/MensRights18/06/12 07:37 PM
4

Actually, since you're making the claim, the onus is on you to prove yourself right.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 06:13 PM
5

Nope. Troll. Downvote.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 06:11 PM
2

But there are so many special scholarsips for black men, not to mention affirmitive action placement in schools and jobs.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 05:25 PM
1

Good description, Grapeban.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 05:24 PM
-3

Well this is helpful since I am sure you speak for all women who play games. Good for you!
/r/MensRights18/06/12 05:23 PM
4

For both of your protection, it is probably best to get a legal and formalized custody arrangement as well as arrangement of child support.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 05:22 PM
0

You brought race into it when you used a famously racist slur int he title of your post and all throughout it. Maybe your false ignorance of such a slur is part of why you weren't cut out for j-school.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 03:02 PM
0

So calling a white person a nigger makes it not a racist slur? Ok then.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:44 PM
-1

How about changing the title of your sub and content of your OP to remove the racial slur?
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:15 PM
-1

TL:DR - It's racist of you to make the assumption that OP meant this as a racial slur. IDIOT.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:12 PM
-1

"Dragon lady" is a racist term. Just because you "haven't heard of it" doesn't change the fact. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DragonLady http://www.alternet.org/culture/151834/%27tiger_lady%27_is_a_racial_slur%3A_how_wendi_deng_murdoch_fights_the_stereotype_of_the_meek_asian_woman_ http://racerelations.about.com/b/2012/01/27/do-suicides-of-asian-soldiers-signal-racism-in-military.htm http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=1521718&mes…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:08 PM
-6

Well, it is a racist term. What's your point?
/r/MensRights18/06/12 01:11 PM
-7

"You're the real racist for calling my racist words/actions racist!" Wow, spoken like a true republican.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 01:11 PM
5

I am sure you are the expert on what feminists should be fighting for. /concern
/r/MensRights18/06/12 12:35 PM
2

They aren't his daughters....You have no idea what the circumstances are or whether or not these children were "robbed" of anything.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 12:34 PM
1

This is great. As a white man, I feel discriminated against and hated every day of my life. I only wish they had this available when I was in college in the 1990s. There is really no group more hated and discriminated against than the white male, IMO.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 12:33 PM
-12

reported for the racism: http://yellow-face.com/
/r/MensRights18/06/12 12:27 PM
1

I reported the post b/c you;re supposed to blackout people's names from screenshots. I did upvote you though.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 12:25 PM
6

Came here to say this, glad to see there was already a post. I visited my hometown yesterday, and was thrilled to see that my brother had custody of his daughter on Father's Day weekend for the first time since she was born. (Evidently the judge really came down hard on my niece's mother for denying visitation at scheduled times, esp. on Father's Day.) I don't have kids, but Father's Day is a rough time for me. My dad died five years ago, and he was such a wonderful, inspiring man that I always …
/r/MensRights17/06/12 01:24 PM
0

Bullshit article from a bullshit website.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 01:18 PM
7

Charities are not supposed to be funded on kickstarter, FYI.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 01:16 PM
3

Even if trolling, it is not acceptable to assault someone out of anger or revenge.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 01:14 PM
-6

A church is not a business. A racket, yes; a business, no. What product or service are you going to boycott when you write your indignant letter? Sorry, I think it's a bad idea sharing and disseminating that information on here.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 03:26 AM
0

I thought they were a mother and father, not stepmother and father. Maybe there were different versions through the years. Nonetheless, great illustrations, thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 03:23 AM
0

I feel like this is a massive troll.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:47 AM
1

That sounds like the most reasonable response so far.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:44 AM
-4

LOLOL!
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:39 AM
-3

LOL!
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:39 AM
1

I think anyone that asks if someone deserves a bitchslap probably needs one themselves.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:39 AM
2

And you're a moderator? Wow.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:38 AM
-10

Is there a Poe's Law for MR?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:36 AM
3

How did she drain your bank account? And if she drained part of it, why not all of it?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:35 AM
-11

What? To burn the church down? So it could be a martyr?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:34 AM
2

Me too. I really have no idea how cruel kids these days can be, but my hope is that they are less-so than the ones from my generation.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 09:45 PM
6

guidestar.org - All the figures are there in the 990s they have to file annually. I'm not sure what discrepancy you're speaking of. I am admittedly not anywhere near an expert on accounting, but the larger gifts (such as the $580K) are most likely multi-year pledges that are booked as fundraising "wins" but not officially accounted for until money is in-hand.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 09:42 PM
7

Um. You do know that an annual operating budget that is in the three-figures is close to shoestring for a national organization, right? I'm not seeing why you put nonprofit in scare quotes or why you are writing to their grant-writer's page. The org's director makes far less than 3 figures, which is well in line with similar-sized nonprofits, and nowhere nearing what the head of a small-to-medium for-profit company would earn. Its governmental funding for FY 2011 were less than 1% of its total a…
/r/MensRights15/06/12 08:50 PM
0

Confused as to your point. The OP does not seem to be deprived of her father. No indication that her parents are even split up. Sorry, I'm missing something. I think it's a sweet gesture (I guess he had all her teachers secretly sign it and that he, himself, is also a teacher???) no doubt, but I don't understand what that has to do with MR.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 07:18 PM
1

Reported as spam. Posted here at least 5 times now in the last 18 hours.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 07:15 PM
0

I thought a lot of the responses to the other video proved its point. What is GoT?
/r/MensRights15/06/12 06:44 PM
-1

FYI, I am posting this here because I've seen several separate spam accounts post links for the indiegogo page here, and if those Google Docs are to be believe, it is really not something I think should be associated with Men's Rights. It is one thing to independently do a documentary or video discussing sexism towards men/male characters in certain media, but I don't think it's adding anything to 1) create such a pursuit in retaliation against someone else and 2) to call people faggots, etc., i…
/r/MensRights15/06/12 06:09 PM
0

But...that's...that's what reddit is for. I don't talk to my friends on reddit.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 05:34 PM
14

Just a head's up. Someone pointed out to me that there was an auto-generated transcript next to the article, and from that, I was able to do some Googling. From what I have found, the little boy's penis and testicles were both removed. Sad and disgusting. http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=6961392&rss=rss-ktrk-article-6961392 Also, to those concerned with the boy being bullied because of recent news reports and fundraising, his name was disclosed publicly during the trial. (…
/r/MensRights15/06/12 04:59 PM
3

Thank you.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 04:46 PM
-2

I had to consult the internet to even find out what happened 5 years ago. I should've said as much in my post, I guess.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 04:46 PM
1

So in order to be an activist you have to urge other activists you're friends with not to be activists about things they care about? Rather than, you know, doing your own actual separate activism that may be counter to the activism your friends are doing? Ok then. (My idea of activism is not arguing with my friends and relatives on the internet.)
/r/MensRights15/06/12 03:44 PM
4

The fuck? I couldn't watch the video, did she cut his penis off too?
/r/MensRights15/06/12 03:42 PM
11

Maybe I'm wrong, it wouldn't be the first time, but I think that you and Some Lame Username are grossly overestimating the attention-span of the average American. We've mostly forgotten about Hurricane Katrina, the first-gen iPhone, the Writers Guild strikes, the Sopranos, and Brittney Spears's head-shaving. Do you think five or more years from now, they'll remember (and make fun of) a boy who was brutally attacked by his mother? Maybe it's wishful thinking on my part, but I sure hope not.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 03:41 PM
3

Ugh, really?
/r/MensRights15/06/12 03:33 PM
0

That's...kind of my point. As for your questions, I think the the answer would be "some men" and "sometimes." That's what the OP seems to be getting at - that her/his agency and agencies s/he works with does serve men and boys as well as women and girls, but the majority of clients end up being women and girls. She is looking to account for that disparity. (At least that's how I read it.)
/r/MensRights15/06/12 03:32 PM
1

Yes. This has been spammed here like 3-4+ other times in a period of about 20 minutes already.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 01:23 PM
4

Do you see a transcript anywhere? I can't watch video and can't find any text-based news/blog, just the Fox video.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 01:17 PM
9

I would attribute only two men seeking help from your agency to the fact that men are conditioned/socialized to not seek help, to not identify abuse as abuse, and to see agencies that offer help as not being accessible to them. Perhaps you could suggest a targeted campaign reaching out to men and boys (at least making it aware that you serve them) and see if you start getting male clients in.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 01:14 PM
2

Maybe I should set myself on fire and become St. Dipshit, patron saint of Reddit. My manifesto can be found at www.lolinternets.dumb.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 02:07 AM
5

I am missing the point to submitting this link here.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 01:58 AM
-5

Well considering they are in collusion with the local law enforcement to keep your dad suspended without pay indefinitely, does it not seem a rather valid concern that they also have the power to be gathering evidence against him electronically as we "speak?" After all, this is the same federal government whose inability to communicate with state and local agencies for relief efforts after a major natural disaster left thousands homeless and dead and hundreds missing. You want help? Name names. …
/r/MensRights15/06/12 01:55 AM
7

Yes, that sounds helpful and I am sure will work out for all parties involved.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 01:46 AM
0

My opinion is that, if it is your friend, leave him/her to his/her own thing, while you do your own. If it bothers you that much, simply ignore it or ask him/her not to share that stuff with you any more.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 01:45 AM
-5

Kind of like a bunch of pathetic dudes who celebrate a guy who beat his kids and killed himself.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 11:18 PM
-9

I'm sorry boxmanboxman, but this post smacks of a huge troll. As for airing dirty laundry, though, I wonder how your dad would feel about you doing so on reddit? I'd be careful with that stuff, considering he's a federal employee on suspension. They could easily be monitoring web-presence. How's the condom business going, btw?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 11:13 PM
3

Commence the downvote brigade. FWIW, I agree that they are not equivalent, and I agree that those who argue that they are are wrong and hurting the anti-circ movement, but your arguments to support that conclusion aren't really holding water. "If I had a choice between the two," is the whole point. These boys and girls don't have the choice. Just because you "prefer it that way" (good for you) does not make the practice any more acceptable. It has absolutely no relevance.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 10:40 PM
-4

Yeah. At lease "she" does. Unlike a bunch of people who want to profit from his suicide for their own political agenda.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:20 PM
-5

See. Maybe if he had lived, she would have been literate and learned how to use punctuation. Who knows. Edit: And I'm sure that comment was vetted for legitimacy as well: http://freekeene.com/2011/06/16/thomas-james-ball-self-immolated-in-protest-of-the-justice-system/#comment-497951337
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:12 PM
0

Most households are two-income, Donkey. I'm not dense, just, you know, learned. But thanks for the downvote, and for thinking that stay-home parents (or in this case "women" i.e., mothers) are lazy freeloaders.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:49 PM
-6

Nope. He's not my fucking hero. And frankly, I can think of many more deserving to wear the name of International Fatherless Day than a man who hit his kid and then left them fatherless for the rest of their lives by killing himself.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:43 PM
0

So what is the argument, then? Because you say: women's self-selection to do something other than work leads to lower income: a nation struggles to understand cause and effect My question is, why do fathers choose their careers over domestic work? Is that not also self-selection? To do something other than childcare and household chores full-time?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:40 PM
0

So being a stay-home-father undermines utility to other people how? (That is even contending that I agree with your premise, which I don't.)
/r/MensRights14/06/12 06:46 PM
1

Well done.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 06:40 PM
-1

Not sure she's a pedo, but def. sounds like a rapist to me.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 06:38 PM
-1

You think so, do you? You think it actually killing someone who is unarmed to stop a crime that is taking place? Mmm hmm.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 06:36 PM
1

I think the comments about her project have largely proven her point.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 05:14 PM
-2

NOt like all those other women who are all just alike in their hatred of men. /roll
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:31 PM
-2

So killing someone out of anger and disgust is okay, so long as they were committing a crime you had handily stopped.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:30 PM
-2

That's not the law, necessarily.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:29 PM
0

So why don't men do this?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:26 PM
3

Yeah. You seem like a pretty sexist jackass. Arrogant, too.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:24 PM
-1

Not here. I know you can't see it now, but there will be a light at the end of the tunnel.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:16 PM
4

Yes. JUST LIKE Nazi Germany, I'm sure.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:04 PM
-4

Yeah, you really can't be too careful with women, who knows what they will pull. I don't think you're being paranoid at all.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:58 PM
3

36->16=not a "tryst" I feel like this article is really making light of her being a sexual predator.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:57 PM
-1

TLDR?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:55 PM
-26

Tosh.0 is a shitty, unfunny show, and I hate it when people act like what is and is not acceptable joke fodder is a pissing contest between such things.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:54 PM
1

How can you tell from a mugshot?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:51 PM
3

That's how I feel about my student loans.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:50 PM
12

I don't think anyone should be able to force a woman to remain pregnant against her wishes, nor do I think that anyone should force a woman to abort against her wishes.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:49 PM
8

Has it ever occurred to you/them that mother's day generally occurs during the school year, while father's day generally occurs during summer break?
/r/MensRights13/06/12 08:03 PM
0

Do you hear that silence? That's all the fucks I am giving. :)
/r/MensRights13/06/12 07:18 PM
-1

Really?
/r/MensRights13/06/12 06:35 PM
-2

I'm a little disappointed: http://content9.flixster.com/photo/13/08/34/13083447_ori.jpg
/r/MensRights13/06/12 06:34 PM
-1

Once the crime was stopped, what was the imminent peril to the little girl? It was a family cookout, as I understood it. (Also, TX has no castle law.) Edit: TX does have stand-your-ground, which is an unreasonable expansion of the castle doctrine.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:55 PM
1

http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.19.htm#19.04 I'm truly shocked to see so many advocates of "street justice" here, considering what has happened in past cases of false accusations. It is in most respects different because the man saw and stopped a crime being committed, but the criminal also should have had a right to a trial.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:54 PM
-1

Yes, it would probably legally be considered manslaughter, depending on the TX statutes.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:46 PM
-2

So you're telling me that's not what happen? That a man did not walk in on someone molesting his daughter, and did not beat him about the head until he died? He was dead at the scene. Immediately.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:36 PM
5

That is wrong on so many different levels. However, can you verify this ad is real? It is very small and grainy.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:34 PM
2

I think the title of your submission is extremely misleading. Obviously it is illegal for a 24-y-o to fuck a 15-y-o, and it is wrong to lie about your age in order to fuck a minor. However, the mother in question had no idea that the 17-y-o boy was in fact a 23-y-o woman. How is the mother complicit in this assault? Obviously, many things are inappropriate about their relationship (how could the mother have known the daughter was using cell phones to send nudie pics to this woman?) The mother al…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:32 PM
-1

Yeah, you keep telling yourself murder is self-defense. Ok. The guy caught this man molesting his daughter. He was understandably disgusted and furious. That does not justify murdering the assailant.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:25 PM
-1

So necessary force means repeatedly beating someone in the head until they are dead? Ok.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:27 PM
1

LOL, smd!
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:26 PM
-1

Except that girls and women were toooooooo.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:23 PM
0

Enjoy raping little girls, bro.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:21 PM
1

No big deal.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:19 PM
-1

Do you hear that? I think it's black helicopters.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:18 PM
-3

I know that "killing" someone, when it is not in self-defense or the defense of someone else's life, is called "murder," yup.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:18 PM
-6

Because you're pathetic and desperate for approval by men on the internet, probably. ;)
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:17 PM
-7

GFY GWW. Being an MRA is the only way you can get attention from men, period. I am sure you can fuck whomever you want.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:17 PM
-3

I stand by it. GWW is nothing more than a pathetic, desperate woman yearning for male approval in some pathetic way.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:15 PM
0

It's a CNN story that has already been posted here now about 20 times. Just use the earch for "buffoon" or "dad" or "sitcom."
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:14 PM
0

Well if the spearhead says it, then it must be true.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:10 PM
-4

And you get automatic downvotes because you tell the truth in your comment! Typical /MR.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:00 PM
8

Are women ever jailed for this type of shit? My brother's ex has been charged with contempt so many times for violating custody arrangements, but no consequences are ever dealt.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:59 PM
0

This seems like about the 10th time in 24 hours that an article about this has been posted. Can we please stop?
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:35 PM
8

I'm dreading this weekend for this simple fact. I don't think my brother's ex has let him have their daughter for a single father's day since she's been born.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:31 PM
-1

I don't think the Vatican has any moral high ground on such matters.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:29 PM
1

This shouldn't really shock anyone, sadly. We by products made from sweatshops at home and overseas, in countries with substandard wages and working conditions. I am glad to see action was taken against the employers, at least.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:29 PM
-17

Is it lonely out there, being such a singular, special snowflake? Maybe one day an MRA will fuck you, too, and THEN you'll be the girl with the most cake!
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:56 PM
-7

Which SFU did not do.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:55 PM
-1

Yes very constructive. Perhaps next he can write to Urban Dictionary.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:51 PM
2

That is truly the funniest shit I've read all day, particularly about he euthanasia. Thanks so much!
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:50 PM
8

Before you get terribly offended, there are a large number of users here who post regularly about "hypergamy," aka, women are just hardwired to be gold-digging sluts.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:48 PM
1

FYI, that image was posted in this subreddit earlier in the day.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:47 PM
-7

Is it a valid use of murder?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:45 PM
-3

Since you're such an intellectual mammoth, you should have no problem backing up your claim. I await your return.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:44 PM
-5

THIS.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:42 PM
-6

Proving his point would have been if he had posted a picture of adult males rather than little kids like the title of his post says. I suppose that wouldn't tug on the idiot heartstrings enough. Of course, that'd require a little bit of intelligence and a little bit of knowledge of the coal industry, which creates a workforce and larger community dependant on the paltry salaries it creates, all while turning hundreds of acres at a time into toxic waste sites.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:41 PM
-9

What I love is how snowflakes intentionally miss the point, winning the male approval so is so very desperate for.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:38 PM
-4

Sadly, yes.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:36 PM
9

Dude. All kinds of women work at UPS. Roofers, I don't know about.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:36 PM
-4

LOL, look at the American trying to school you on British history!
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:35 PM
-10

I don't misunderstand him. I understand full well his intention, which is that women get to stay home and knit while men go out and do the dirty work, which has never been the fucking case, particularly in the era the photograph is taken. Please read the title of the post. He says women and men. He does not say children or boys. HE is the one pointing out false equivalencies and lying about his intentions. In the TITLE OF THE FUCKING POST he asserts that (straw)feminists (whatever) say WOMEN WER…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:27 PM
-8

No, he's not. Please read the title of the post. He says women and men. He does not say children or boys. HE is the one pointing out false equivalencies and lying about his intentions. In the TITLE OF THE FUCKING POST he asserts that feminists (whatever) say WOMEN WERE OPPRESSED b/c of domestic work, while MEN SPENT TIME IN THE MINES. The then shows a picture of child laborers, ignoring that many victims of child labor were also girls, and that working conditions in the whole of the industrial r…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:23 PM
-5

So cronyism is okay, provided it's used to advance causes you agree with?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:19 PM
15

Special to OP: These boys were not miners, and they weren't working "in" coal mines: http://www.shorpy.com/node/1644 Not to say that what they did couldn't be dangerous and dirty, but to get into a pissing match about which kind of child labor is worse is just STUPID.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 09:17 PM
-6

Um. What are the boy coal miners doing? If you'll check the provenance of the image, you'll find they are standing around, about to eat lunch. Clearly you are impossible and somewhat intellectually deficient, so whatever.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 09:05 PM
-4

LOL. I have a female friend that wants nothing more than to be a SAHM and do stupid hipster mom shit. I guess it would never occur to her to let her husband or boyfriend be the one to stay home with a baby for a few years?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 08:33 PM
3

Smoke pot?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 08:32 PM
-3

So it is not their YOUTH that we are meant to be shocked by, but their maleness? http://library.thinkquest.org/trio/TTQ02189/box_factory.gif http://argenteditions.com/images/large//lewis-hine/lewis-hine-child-labor-mill-girl-02315-700.jpg http://docsouth.unc.edu/nc/childlabor/mckel14.jpg http://0.tqn.com/d/womenshistory/1/0/2/m/2/child-labor-spinners-01346v.jpg http://georgiainfo.galileo.usg.edu/gastudiesimages/Child%20Labor-Girls%201.jpg http://www.myhistoryclass.net/images/girls_factory_work_f…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 08:27 PM
1

FYI, this has already been submitted here.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:42 PM
2

In no situation is an adult fucking a 12-year-old "fine." In most countries, in fact, not only would it not be fine, but it would be "rape."
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:41 PM
-9

Thank you for explaining that to me. I understand so much very better how to reddit now. From now on I will be a condescending mother figure instead of just saying what I think about things.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:40 PM
-6

So in what world are we living in now that boys aren't children? Really? We're really trying to conflate labor laws with a bunch of anti-feminism venom just because we say so now? Oh, dipshits, dipshits all around. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/boy
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:38 PM
-11

Nope. Look at my user history, you will see.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:16 PM
-1

You wrote an angry letter to Urban Dictionary? Really? And of all "offensive" defintions, that's the one you choose to report?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:14 PM
-6

LOL. You mean people downvote one another here based on their perceived male or femaleness? Nice.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:10 PM
-13

Good luck with that, dude...this dipshit doesn't give a fuck about worker's rights, men's rights, poor people's rights, just hating feminists.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:43 PM
-17

Unless you were getting burned alive.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:43 PM
-16

And some shithead downvoted you because you are 100% correct. Have an upvote, lean back, and enjoy the circle jerk!
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:42 PM
-15

Yeah. Retaliating against someone with a non-gendered slur indicating a level of intelligence rather than them being a unmasculine man or too-masculine women are TOTALLY THE SAME. Sorry, I don't abide dipshits that don't know what the fuck they're talking about.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:41 PM
0

"Consensual" sex between a 12-year-old and a 19-year-old is okay by you? Gross.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:39 PM
-3

And? That doesn't make it right, and it's fallacious and illogical reasoning nonetheless.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:38 PM
-20

No, dipshit. Laws made it obsolete. Way before any technological improvements. The laws were made because people raised a shitstorm, and rightfully so. Downvoted and reported for using the slur bitch, which is both sexist and an ad hominem.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:37 PM
-33

I've realized that you are fucking idiotic and shouldn't be engaged with anything resembling actual facts or data. Have a downvote, asswipe! Also, there are these web sites called Google.com and Wikipedia.org that you can goon and learn your shit before coming here.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:36 PM
-12

Were the unions primarily male back then? I'm thinking of companies like Triangle Shirtwaist and other textiles that hired a lot of women workers.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:34 PM
1

This one? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/sxdha/gender_discrimination_website_for_popular/
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:33 PM
-6

Those are not men, those are children. Laws against child labor and regulations to increase workplace safety came into place during the industrial revolution largely because of work by the women's movement, churches, and the organized labor movement. Maybe you should really re-think your post.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:15 PM
-2

I have in the past, but I've since mellowed with age, I think, and women are more receptive to my views, especially my strongly taking pregnancy-prevention into my own hands. I don't fuck around with that shit and make it clear from the start.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 05:25 PM
6

Thanks for sharing the article, it was a good read. I honestly think my favorite all-time TV dads are Dan Connor (Roseanne) and Bernie Mac (Bernie Mac Show.) Dan could be a bit traditionalist and rough around the edges at times (getting into a fist fight, hitting his SIL's boyfriend) but he played an active role in raising children, he wasn't a numbskull when it came to the kitchen, and he had a strong-willed wife that he was equal with in every way. Bernie Mac I liked because he was a non-tradi…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 05:23 PM
1

Oh, you are demonstrably wrong, don't worry. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126309699 http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-middle-east-s-feminist-revolution http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/03/201134111445686926.html http://arabiangazette.com/5-myths-about-feminism-in-middle-east/ http://www.smi.uib.no/seminars/Pensum/Abu-Lughod.pdf (PDF) http://www.womenofchina.cn/ http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3175541 http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.as…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 05:15 PM
-3

So people should not have any voice in something happening on their campus, any vote whatsoever, because feminism? Do you feel the same way about all elections in the US and Canada in general?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 05:02 PM
0

Births outside of marriage do not necessarily equal single-parent households, though, do they? From the article you link: Among mothers of all ages, a majority — 59 percent in 2009 — are married when they have children. The number of chilren born outside of marraige to women under 30 is 53%, not 60%, and is still the minority (41%) for all children born to moethers of all ages. Further, "Almost all of the rise in nonmarital births has occurred among couples living together." Does that not includ…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:59 PM
-2

Citations? And if the number of "single" mothers is rising then they wouldn't be included in this survey anyway. http://www.insure.com/articles/lifeinsurance/fathers-day-index.html Upon reading the "survey" further, it frankly just sounds like an insurance sales pitch.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:37 PM
1

What the hell kind of adult calls people sluts? Immature jackass ones. Fuck them. Your argument is crap, and others here have far more handily discredited it than I feel like doing.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:21 PM
3

Aren't most households two-income?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:20 PM
1

You're extremely wrong about that, and you're also erasing the fact that there are Muslim feminists and activists as well as Chinese feminists and anti-communist activists. But believe what you want, because feminism is bad.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:19 PM
1

I have a very good friend who attends SF. As he explains it, it is not the fact that they are building the center that they oppose, but that it was railroaded through by powerful members of the student government without the input of the student body at large.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:16 PM
0

The bigger question is why are you shopping at Go Jane?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:14 PM
-1

This is why I always go ahead and flush my condoms even though you are not supposed to and also clean up any seed I spill on my partner's stomach, ass, tits, etc, with a little spray bottle and cloth. I have never had one give me any lip about it though.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:13 PM
2

So who knows what's best for them, then? You? Us MRAs?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:12 PM
0

I don't really see how the wage gap is a MR issue in and of itself. Refuting it, yes, but not by itself.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:11 PM
-1

You know, it's been my experience that people who hate gay men but are fine with lesbians are other men. I do agree - homophobia and bullying are terrible, but I down voted you for saying "feminazis and white knights." It's not a pissing match.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:09 PM
2

I think you're full of shit making an equivalency b/w stud and "creepy," "pervert," or "man whore." I don't really think people call guys "studs" any more either, really. Maybe something more like "ladies' man." You are also wrong about the term "slut." It isn't simply used to describe a "promiscuous" woman with too many partners (whatever that means.) It describes any woman who is even remotely perceived as sexual. Do you think half of the people called sluts in high school by other girls or ev…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:00 PM
6

That seems to be my experience too, unfortunately. IDK why it is considered so taboo.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 02:52 PM
9

I think it's very relevant that the majority violence men face is from other men. We need to dig deeper into this and figure out how to counteract such violence.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 01:11 AM
-9

This is extremely offensive. Reported.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 08:32 PM
1

Could you please put this into a little bit of context? What started out as an interesting discussion? What is "it" in "it seems to have become a topic dissecting why men abuse women"? "Someone" who? Knowing that would help.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 08:21 PM
0

Not saying it is better, just that saying she saw a psychic was incorrect.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 08:17 PM
4

So maleness is defined by physical labor and physical strength? Because my brain is telling me putting that shit in a gift bag would be way easier. I guess gift bags are too faggy??? And the Whiskey Lover's Manbox? Everyone knows the only proper way to drink whiskey is neat.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 07:37 PM
1

The one linked below, Fox.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 07:32 PM
0

That's not quite what the article says.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:59 PM
18

I agree. Judicial misconduct in the worst way. I hope the father can and will appeal.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:58 PM
11

Is this the list Ignatious Loyola was working on? If so he forgot to add a section detailing the shocking prevalence of male-on-male violence.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:55 PM
2

Aren't gender roles, by default, unnatural? (In that they are learned/acquired, not inherent?)
/r/MensRights11/06/12 02:51 PM
3

What does /r/feminism have to do with Men's Rights in the slightest?
/r/MensRights11/06/12 02:48 PM
4

It's not clear from the post whether this is a first-hand account (he heard or overheard Maria say it) or hearsay (his wife told him what Maria said.)
/r/MensRights11/06/12 02:46 PM
1

She seems to be referring to the notion of "fighting mental illness," not fighting with her children and spouse.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 02:45 PM
-26

That's cool because this subreddit took Mother's Day and shat all over it anyway, so, like, two father's days!
/r/MensRights11/06/12 02:44 PM
3

But most CEOs will be men. (NTTATWWT)
/r/MensRights11/06/12 01:19 AM
0

Very sad. I will be interested to see how conservative Kennedy-haters spin this.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 01:16 AM
12

Stupid sexist bullshit that shouldn't be encouraged here.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 01:13 AM
1

People aren't property. You shouldn't brand them like cows.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 03:41 PM
1

Yes, I look forward to this. I hope it was strongly worded.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 12:33 PM
-2

Where? This is a lie.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 03:53 AM
-8

In what part of the country are you that has anything remotely resembling "abortion-on-demand"?
/r/MensRights09/06/12 03:53 AM
5

I don't think so. I do this no matter who comes to visit.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 03:38 AM
-5

It's not "assigning blame" to point out the simple fact that men are both the primary victims of and perpetrators of crime. It's an indisputable fact. Whatsmore, most murderers are white (nearly half), and most murders are intra-racial. Simple fact, not a judgement call.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 08:56 PM
-5

Plenty of people in the black community talk about intraracial crime. There is no reason for this to be taboo in the MR community. Merely saying "men commit most crimes against men" makes no judgement about anyone. It is a simple statement of fact.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 08:09 PM
-7

You don't think male-on-male violence is a relevent point? Why is that taboo here?
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:27 PM
1

You should start on the right side of this page: Short list of the challenges faced by men, Some general information, and the other hyperlinks On the difference between... and The Men's Right subreddit is a place...
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:17 PM
-5

There is no reason for you to take it like that. I am simply stating the indisputible facts. When you say men comprise most victims of violent crimes, you should also say that men are the ones who are perpetrating these crimes against other men.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:14 PM
2

Is this correct? http://web.archive.org/web/20110708100811/http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AbuseIsOkayWhenItIsFemaleOnMale
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:13 PM
1

PRobably on Google Cache or even Wayback machine. Will see what I can find.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:03 PM
-2

Aren't men also more likely to be perpetrators of violent crime (re: point 2)? Citation: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0702.pdf
/r/MensRights08/06/12 06:48 PM
1

I'm confused. If they simply renamed "Abuse is Okay when It is Female on Male" to "Double Standard Abuse: Female on Male" then what is the big deal?
/r/MensRights08/06/12 06:43 PM
-3

I would like to see the paperwork on this breakdown.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:38 PM
1

Thanks for linking here, IDK if I would have seen it otherwise. I also heard on the news this a.m. about some (male) legislator going public about being sexually abused, I can't recall where it was though.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:32 PM
1

So the courts defy the legislation?
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:31 PM
1

No, I very rarely downvote anything.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:31 PM
0

Was he in arrears? Because even with the highest income and six children, he would only pay about 20% of his income: http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/3119.021
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:07 PM
-28

I am truly sorry this hapened to you. The only thing worse than a teenage girl is a 30-something woman. Gross.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:04 PM
-30

I am truly sorry this hapened to you. The only thing worse than a teenage girl is a 30-something woman. Gross.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:03 PM
10

It is always important to probe first.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:03 PM
1

In what state did your husband pay 60% of his income, and how many children was he supporting?
/r/MensRights08/06/12 04:58 PM
-1

Please read the links provided, they refute your claims quite handily.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 04:57 PM
-1

Yes I am sure that happens all the time.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 04:56 PM
-1

There is nothing morally wrong with being fat. Has it ever occurred to you that fat people don't give a flying fuck what you, or anyone like you, thinks?
/r/MensRights08/06/12 04:56 PM
5

That is what a good infographic looks like. And not a "LOL FEMALES" to be seen.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 04:03 PM
2

Either way. Incorrect assumption.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 04:01 PM
2

Fatness is no indicator of healthfulness, and shame has never changed anyone's behavior for the better. Further, fat people are people, and as such, deserve to be treated with respect unless they give you a reason not to do so. I have no desire to be shitty someone just because they are fat or not fat, and I believe shaming people is wrong under every circumstance. Further reading: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/25384.php http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106268439 h…
/r/MensRights08/06/12 04:00 PM
5

I think it's an incorrect assumption that most fat women have poor self esteem. I do agree that it is not right to shame thin people, just as it is not right to shame fat people.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 03:13 PM
2

One post troll. Reported.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 03:11 PM
-5

I guess I don't knwo many single parents that make $70K per year, nope. Not in my neck of the woods. In my state you have to have 6+ kids to pay $800. Or make $77K per year. That works out to be about 12% of your income. Is that an unreasonable percentage to pay towards your children's housing, transport, medical, day care, education, etc?
/r/MensRights08/06/12 03:01 PM
1

I have felt like this on and off since my teens. I have heard of men's programs where you basically go into the woods and yell and shit, but it's not for me. I will have to check out the book you mention.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 01:37 PM
1

I agree with this sentiment.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 01:17 PM
13

Does the reason truly matter all that much, whether for revenge or for custody? They are equally despicable "reasons." Even if it were b/c of infidelity, it in no way justifies the crime.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 01:06 PM
-9

Scanned court documentation should be sufficient.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 01:03 PM
-1

So there's a good reason to be abusive?
/r/MensRights08/06/12 01:02 PM
1

B ut that is the thing, we don't expect special treatment based on our sex or political viewpoints.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:53 AM
1

No doubt. Truly a fitting punishment for perjury and making false statements to police.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:53 AM
-26

LOL, who the fuck pays $800/mo for child support? No one I know, for damn sure.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:49 AM
2

Could you please be more specific? Is this the case of a woman being impregnated from her dead partner's seed, which he consensually gave up before his death? Or does someone go in and retrieve the sperm after the man has died? It makes a difference.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:48 AM
-5

Downvoted for your condescending tone. I read the article and agree with Grapeban.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:46 AM
-3

I think socialism has killed enough people.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:43 AM
20

She sounds really overly emotional, just like a typical feminist, no offense.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:39 AM
-6

FYI there is no such thing as a good feminist, IMO.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:38 AM
-2

I care. I care. I really do care.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:37 AM
-15

I really want to like this but Ali Carr-Chellman is a noted feminazi and man-hater. I am surprised she is doing a talk about this at all, frankly.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 10:27 PM
-4

I think I just did, shit brains.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 10:24 PM
-5

Ooooh, wascally wabbit knows how to search user history. Truly frightening! And yes, cheating on and leaving my abusive ex is the best thing I've ever done.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 10:23 PM
4

But without sperm, which moves, there would be no fertilization, implantation, or growth. I think you're going to have to come up with a better argument than "he left it in her" to make the case for LPS.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:48 PM
-4

You mean like this?
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:47 PM
-4

Aaaand instant downvotes from MR!
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:45 PM
-13

So rape accusers should now be shielded if they happen to be male? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:31 PM
-8

That's not antiquated, Hardwarequestions. That's the legal threshold for entering into a verbal or written contract, including a verbal "contract" for sex. I wasn't aware this was a rape apologist subreddit.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:19 PM
-2

You can't sign legally binding contracts, can you? At any rate, I'm not going there with you. It is fucked up to think that someone is lying, just as it is fucked up to assume someone is a rapist.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:00 PM
2

As a white american male, I must say that you are without a doubt a racist black american male if you agree with that article.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 07:28 PM
-6

If the other party is too drunk or intoxicated to give consent, it is rape, full stop. This includes when women give teenage boys booze to "loosen them up." What makes you think a successful athlete is incapable of rape? You have no idea what happened and already you are accusing the victim of being a liar, as well as blaming her for her own alleged rape.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 07:26 PM
-4

The only people who saw hitler as a hero were people whose judgement's can't be trusted or valued, and whose opinions and perspectives can only be classified as WRONG. Moving on...
/r/MensRights07/06/12 05:26 PM
-4

Because she's a woman? I see now! Brilliant!
/r/MensRights07/06/12 05:21 PM
-5

By "completely different perspective," you mean "completely wrong perspective."
/r/MensRights07/06/12 05:19 PM
-14

Yes I truly care about chauvinism too.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 05:18 PM
2

Why would you mentor a child in a program specifically called Go-Girl? Do you feel like you're qualified to mentor girls on how to become high-achieving young women? Boys in the Big Brothers program are not paired with Big Sisters. Do you plan on raising a fit about the following programs? http://www.mentoringboys.com/ http://www.boystomen.org/ http://www.journeymenasheville.com/mentoring_boys_about.html http://www.bamgroups.com/bam_site/Home.html http://www.boysmentoring.org/ http://www.zetarho…
/r/MensRights07/06/12 05:09 PM
0

Communists? Really? Next.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 01:52 PM
2

Why would you, as a man, want to mentor young girls?
/r/MensRights07/06/12 01:50 PM
2

Upvoted, just because.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 01:49 PM
2

I first went in when Reagan was president, trickle down economics didnt trickle down. It was my way of getting a job that would benefit me later, and I couldnt get fired for 4 years if the economy continued to tank. It was the absolute best experience of my life, and now I never have to worry about medical or dental and I have a passive income from it. That was kind of what I was getting at, though. I'm doubting you served with may people that had familyl wealth or a college fund, though.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 08:37 PM
3

True. It is theoretically an arrestable/prosecutable offense, though.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 08:34 PM
4

Targets the poor, though. I don't like that the only way many men feel they can get ahead is by (possibly) dying for the foolish government.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:44 PM
3

Exactly spot-on. Thank you.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:42 PM
7

Why are you surprised? Male U.S. citizens have to apply for selective services after their 18th birthday. That is not to say I agree with it, but you shouldn't be shocked by this.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:41 PM
0

Yes, it is wrong.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:38 PM
2

LOL even more.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 01:07 PM
2

IDK why someone downvoted you, you were simply speaking the truth. Upvote, brother!
/r/MensRights06/06/12 01:00 PM
0

TBH, this list seems very straw-feminist to me. And pointless.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 12:59 PM
2

Different kinds of rape? I wasn't aware there were any. I stand by what I said, though. A rapist waiting behind the bushes to attack his/her victim would very well use the victim's supposed "enjoyment" of the attack as a defense. Honestly I think it's ridiculous you would suggest such a thing.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 02:40 AM
5

I have never been in a store where a woman has entered my fitting room area.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 02:38 AM
0

Lew Rockwell. You mean Ron Paul's racist ghost writer? Ok.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 02:37 AM
-3

Honestly, I believe that "hypergamy" was a word created by men who fear women who fuck without guilt.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 02:37 AM
3

Edit: Replacing LOL females with LOL Male Privilege is just a stupid looking as before and makes you look like just as much as an immature idiot.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 02:34 AM
1

Oh well then what are they complaining about, 91% is almost 100% after all.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 02:32 AM
2

Your equating physical force with power, when it's more complicated than that, especially when the victim has been given drugs or alcohol. "Pretending" to enjoy it would likely do nothing except give the rapist a defense that the attack was indeed consensual in a court of law.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 02:30 AM
-4

I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. You were posting inspirational quotes and initially equated circumcision (I'm guessing) with genocide, when there is absolutely no comparison. Now you post an inspirational quote by a fictional character called Jesus Christ, I make a remark that Jesus Christ is a fictional character while the rest of the people you quoted are real, and you start talking about religion, circumcision, and the bible? Really. No sense to be made.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 02:21 AM
1

Lol.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 02:18 AM
1

What state do you live in right now? Either way, you will have recourse if your ex denies visitation or demands additional money in exchange for visitation.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 08:07 PM
2

Get a legal custody arrangement and child support arrangement.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:49 PM
-6

At least one of those quotes is from a fictional character.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:48 PM
8

It looks like shit. Any 1st grader could tell you that. No need to pussyfoot around the subject.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:48 PM
-5

What is Godwin is not necessarily ethical or right.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 05:45 PM
7

Yes there are a lot of remale MRAs here and they go to /ladymras. You truly will give it a unique point of view.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 05:44 PM
1

Just tried to post that here, I am glad the page now directs to an existing post if it's already been submitted.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 05:42 PM
0

You're pretty transparent like that, yes.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:58 PM
1

They will also steal your sperm and get pregnant just to get child support or force you to marry them. Feminists do that all the time so be careful.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:56 PM
1

Yeah, sure.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:55 PM
2

Agreed. I would not want to marry a woman who has no interest in working and irresponsible with her financial obligations.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:54 PM
1

MR relevance?
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:53 PM
2

She admitted to fucking her boyfriend. THE WHORE!
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:53 PM
3

I agree. Try Information is Beautiful. Great site.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:50 PM
128

That is not a nice infographic. It looks like shit and is difficult to read.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:49 PM
10

If he wants to be a dad, he should impregnate someone that wants to be a mom.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:46 PM
0

Sure. You are full of shit in your assertion that bros "look promiscuous," or that anyone, including you, thinks that. "Douchebag" is not the "male equivalent" of "looking promiscuous."
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:45 PM
1

Point being, neither of you "looked promiscuous." In my mind anyway.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:43 PM
-2

I'm sorry, but I think there is only one that you actually associate with "promiscuity" and it is not that of the bros.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:20 PM
7

How does one "look" promiscuous? I don't know about your high school, but in mine, the most promiscuous in my experience were the conservative Christians who were ashamed about it. Also, a vagina is not a car. They do not depreciate with age or mileage.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 09:01 PM
2

Yes, I agree with this, especially coming from a moderator.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 08:57 PM
-1

Um. Because they are one in the same. Durden is a figment of the imagination. That male aspirational fantasy doesn't actually exist. Maybe that's saying something.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 06:56 PM
1

The Narrator (Edward Norton) and Tyler are one in the same. Tyler - an uber-violent, selfish, terrorist - is a fiction of the narrator's imagination. It has nothing to do with "ball clipping" and everything to do with mental illness laced with anti-consumerism.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 06:10 PM
1

Most of the comments are urging him to leave the relationship and take the children due to safety concerns. It doesn't surprise me that some users there, however, advise counseling. Many Christians also do the same when the women is being abused, I don't see how this is any different.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 06:04 PM
2

I tend to think neither.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 06:01 PM
8

I like Chuck Palahniuk as the next guy, but no, I do not think we need a psychopathic terrorist with anxious masculinity as our movement's main protaganist.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 04:53 PM
2

More like they are pushed into the army b/c there are no steady jobs. You don't see rich kids joining the military as much.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 03:17 PM
1

Dictionary.com definition != legal definition
/r/MensRights04/06/12 03:12 PM
0

It looks like you have 34 upvotes. Mission accomplished, I guess.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 03:11 PM
0

Is this a repost?
/r/MensRights03/06/12 11:26 PM
1

Funny but what does this have to do with MR?
/r/MensRights03/06/12 11:24 PM
1

Not really. Would you want to date a woman that has no job, no transportation, that you would have to financially support or pay for every time you went out together? Not me.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 01:55 PM
11

I don't see a problem with this. It's a red herring, but even if it weren't, I believe the reasons for womens' abortions are of no consequence to the federal government.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 01:49 PM
0

MRAs are quite symathetic to the conservative right however.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 05:41 PM
1

O.O
/r/MensRights01/06/12 05:15 PM
7

If you go forward with he idea that people, especially women, are basically bad, it will become a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you are 25 and a virgin...well...yeah, you need to get over your money issues and hangups about women, IMO. Talk to a financial planner. So long as you aren't intending on getting married any time soon, no one can take your money unless you let them, or they physically steal from you.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 02:52 PM
1

I don't know if that would be an appropriate reading assignment for a middle school boy, TBH.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 02:48 PM
1

I guesss that's a step in the right direction, though I think all states need major adoption reform.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 02:43 PM
2

Are you trying to say that domestic violence is no big deal? Not convicting/punshing men for domestic violence does absolutely no good for Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 02:41 PM
16

How old are you? Contrary to Anthony Zarat and others, and what you might be lead to believe here, women are not, by default, money-grubbing sluts. There are no guarantees in life, but you are capable of protecting your money and yourself and finding love and/or sex with an honest, mature woman as well, you just have to take it slow and take the time to really get to know someone and trust someone.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 02:37 PM
2

Blackmail is a criminal offense in most states, if not all.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 02:35 PM
3

If you don't have her consent to post the pictures, then you should not post them. If you do it without her permission, you are a much worse person for it.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 02:33 PM
1

What just happend?
/r/MensRights31/05/12 08:09 PM
1

Yes, you definitely came off as an asshole in that thread. This is a subreddit about Men's Rights, BTW, not "SRS Is Mean To Me."
/r/MensRights31/05/12 07:30 PM
8

You're proud of yourself for never going to the doctor? Good on you. I am sure that will work well when you are in stage 4 cancer in 15 years.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 02:28 PM
1

My current GF's ex-husband is a lawyer, and he was in law school while they were together. They waited until after his final year of loans were taken out to get married so that they would not be considered marital debt in the case of divorce. She was not on the hook for any of his school debt. As she mostly supported him throughout his schooling, she only paid about $1,000 for an attorney for the whole matter as property division wasn't an issue. I would consult with an attorney in your state ab…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:18 PM
0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notes_on_a_scandal I have not read the book, but the movie does not paint the teacher in a good light.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 12:51 PM
7

And by telling his students which topics they must and must not study, how is that not "injecting it into academia?" How about academic freedom for students and faculty?
/r/MensRights24/05/12 06:30 PM
5

Just. WTF. So sad. So fucked up. You don't want the father to have more visitation so you kill your own daughter and granddaugter? Jesus. I mean, even setting aside the fact that two people have been murdered, it just makes no sense. Here is another story from the hometown paper: http://www.centralkynews.com/winchestersun/news/ws-citation-reveals-lillie-stantons-motive-for-slayings-of-daughter-granddaughter-20120524,0,5826226.story
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:45 PM
11

This seems more appropriate for a personal blog post. It sounds like, by insisting students not come to you with a "political or ideological agenda," that you, yourself, have one, IMHO.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:41 PM
2

Are you looking for MR-specific books only?
/r/MensRights24/05/12 04:20 PM
1

What are you talking about? Where do you live that there is an active draft? Is it for men only? I know that Israel and other countries require military service both genders.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:39 PM
1

My advice would be to expect for mistakes to happen, and try to learn from them. Regarding rape accusations, I would suggest just no fucking people who are buzzed or hamered. As for fake domestic violence claims, that's a toughie. Since your so you and though maybe it would be a good idea to just take it slow with people you date, really get to know them and trust them, don't rush to move in with anyone or let them move in with you, and watch out for warning signs so that you may simply walk awy…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:38 PM
1

This is a very thoughtful post. Re your black-on-black violence, I have noticed that a LOT of white people bring this up, though, when there is white-on-black violence, to deflect from discussing racism. For example the Trayvon Martin shooting, when people were speculating that racial prejudice may have played a part in the murder others got really up and arms about it and were saying "well why don't you care more about black-on-black violence." Just something to be aware of.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:34 PM
2

Yeah I was wondering about taht.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:31 PM
1

A good friend of mine is a bartender, and they routinely have Lingerie Football on. I do find it disturbing, I would rather just watch men (or women) play sports for real on the TV than watch someone be prancing around to be ogled and laughed at. It's like saying you look at playboy for the articles.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:31 PM
-2

Racism in US immigration and custody law whou would have thought.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:28 PM
1

Um. Yes?
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:15 PM
2

Oh yes I understand and agree I just thought I was missing something from the article.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:15 PM
-1

I don't need to be educated, I just didn't see what the article you linked had to do with a man being defrauded of CS. Are you asserting that no criminal frauds be repaid until all CS fraud is repaid?
/r/MensRights24/05/12 01:44 AM
-3

Oh, I understand now. It is a retard I'm talking to. I'm sorry about your condition.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 01:42 AM
0

And? Start a separate thread about it instead of hijacking others.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 01:41 AM
0

The article doesn't say this - how has a father been been defrauded of cild support???
/r/MensRights24/05/12 12:51 AM
5

I think that you are blind, deaf or willfully ignorant if you've never encountered this happening publicly. I work downtown and ride the bus to and from work each day. It happens at least weekly, if not more. I think that people claiming NAMALT and women catcall too should start a new thread instead of derailing hte existing one.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 12:44 AM
-2

If men were not allowed to take part in the anti-war movement, then who burned draft cards? Your statement is faulty on its face for two reasons: 1) first, you state "prefer," then you say "have to," which are contradictory 2) there is no longer (ideally) a men's role or women's role Perhaps that's the point of these photos. There is now more freedom of choice in both genders, and even though we embrace this freedom, we also hold tightly to the past. Even though men can be stay-at-home fathers a…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 12:40 AM
2

yup! :0
/r/MensRights24/05/12 12:32 AM
2

I think you should contact the artist before you read too much into his photos.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 12:31 AM
8

I am posting response to SeacrestHulk since for some reason my question as to whether it was a photo shoot or photo shop (before he posted his comment clarifying) was downvoted into oblivion: FY there is more info here: http://mikebyrne.artistswanted.org/exposure2011 I see it as more subverting the medium of fashion photography (as the photographer is more of a fine-arts photographer) than any real statement on MRA (or as you put it "male privilege - I really do wish people would not editorializ…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:22 PM
1

And I suppose it was the women who were expected to stay home, take care of children, sit there in awkward poses, and look pretty, not speaking up or at all being involved in any sort of anti-war activities (or ANYTHING), while the world goes on around them without their input. (That is what I got out of it, that it indeed is a 2-way street.)
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:20 PM
3

I think it really depends on what field you are in. A lot of the tech guys here at work have extremely long hair, but our front-line people don't. Some of the back-of-the-house creatives have full sleeve tattoos and dress very trendy, again, our front-line folks, men and women, are all very conservative looking (men with short hair, women with longer, but not past shulder-length long hair).
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:18 PM
-1

FY there is more info here: http://mikebyrne.artistswanted.org/exposure2011 I see it as more subverting the medium of fashion photography (as the photographer is more of a fine-arts photographer) than any real statement on MRA (or as you put it "male privilege - I really do wish people would not editorialize their submissions like that.) There is definitely a hard-hitting contrast between the serious and frivolous, but ultimately it's all phoney, as all participants are models in the fictional s…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:14 PM
2

Well the nurses at the ward should probably know. Doubtful you could talk to the Dr. on staff as s/he probably just does rounds and leaves.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 06:58 PM
-15

So is this an actual photo shoot or a really terrible photoshop attempt at "making a statement."
/r/MensRights23/05/12 06:38 PM
5

Hopefully it will not come to that, but could you privately take the initiative to call the ward in the hospital you plan on taking your wife? You may also be able to call your wife's OBGYN or the pediatrician you plan to use.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 06:36 PM
2

I fully support equal rights for all people, and that includes LGBTQI people. I fully support marriage equality, parenting equality, adoption equality, equality in housing, employment, education, and general access. I am also starting to see more fully the impact of hatred against trans folks the way I came to see the impact of hatred against gay folks in the 1990s. I hope that I can see full equality in my life time.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 06:12 PM
2

Oh, okay. It confused me b/c neither your x-post nor the OP had any text, just the title of the submission. I think he is editorializing/sensationalizing a bit because he is depressed about it (i.e., saying he is just a checkbook). I don't know his situation, but I have to say I can understand that, if the ex-couple aren't on the greatest terms, the custodial mom may not go out of her way to make the kids call their father on his birthday. And who knows, maybe she will not even let him call the …
/r/MensRights23/05/12 05:54 PM
3

How old are your kids? Which kid did you hear from?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:32 PM
2

I did not say "forces a woman to child against her wish." I said "obscenely intrusive." The I think your first bullet point was brought up and put to the test in Ohio - it's already been struck down as ineffective since 1) male permission has been challenged and overruled in other states and 2) a willing friend or relative could very easily attest to his "paternity" so that she may get an abortion. Your second bullet point doesn't really make sense - do you think all women who have abortions are…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:27 PM
1

Oh, I see now.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:13 PM
2

It sounds like you were a victim of gender profiling.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:13 PM
5

If I may - what is "preshaming?"
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:03 AM
4

So what would that be, then? I know it will not be a popular opinion here, but as "unfair" as it is that men have "no say" in pregnancy, any laws I could envision that would remedy such a situation would be obscenely intrusive.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 09:05 PM
3

Why is there a brand new user name called "PayChFairnessAct" coming to MR to tell us about the National Women's Law Center urging women to contact their representatives?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:54 PM
2

OK. That sounds pretty similar to what I did except you work for one publication rather than an aggregated source. Am I correct in my assumption that things like abortion or birth control go into "women's issues," while family law, prostate screening funding, etc. might instead go into "legal reform" and "health care"?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:31 PM
4

So what laws need to be changed, then? And I think when anyone, man or woman, commits or attempts to commit suicide, we ask ourselves why. And signs of previous mental trouble are certainly no reason to dismiss.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:28 PM
5

So why do we, then? Why do we care about this particular man in this particular situation with the words "abort his child" in the sensationalist headline?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 07:40 PM
3

You will have to be more specific about your job. I have an indexing and cataloging background and things were not classified as "men's issues" (or whatever nomenclature was) because men were de facto targets of articles, advertising, etc. in print. This has been over ten years, though, so I am surprised if things haven't changed since then.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 07:22 PM
21

So when the father wants the child, it's the evil girlfriend's fault if she has an abortion and the father kills himself. But when father doesn't want the child, and she has it anyway, it's the evil girlfriend's fault when the father kills himself because he didn't want kids. OK. This guy's problems ran far deeper than your sensational headline, TopTrool. Please don't editorialize articles in such a way.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 06:41 PM
1

This really adds nothing to the discussion, IMO.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:56 PM
1

This is not what I see in other men at all, and it sounds like your definition of "being a guy" is very narrow. Your are speaking in a lot of false generalities and buzzwords which makes me think you're trolling, honestly.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:55 PM
2

I find it hard to believe this movie could be anything but awful.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:52 PM
2

Yes, I have friends who have done this. I really don't have a huge desire to move to either of those countries. I was more enticed by the supposed boatloads of money to be made in the Middle East. :)
/r/MensRights22/05/12 02:56 PM
1

I understood and upvoted you. You speculated as to why I was DV'd and I said it might be because it's a (not really) false equivalency since men theoretically can "abandon" their kids (and are charged with being deadbeat dads) but women who don't do this and are "stuck with them" "choose" to do so. Or something.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 02:07 PM
1

Could be clarify your question? Do yiou mean if you were married to someone (or partnered with someone) who got pregnant and had a baby, but it had another father?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 02:03 PM
1

What in the actual fuck? What sick fucks upvoted this. It was not "his fault." He doesn't "need to change." He needs to get the fuck out and never go back.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 02:02 PM
0

Citation please?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 01:59 PM
3

He found out Christian Adoption Services in Matthews had placed the baby, whom Greg has named "Chase," with a family in the triad. Such adoption agencies are so very sketchy. They basically exist to talk women out of abortion and then steal their babies to put in loving, 2-parent "Christian" homes. Johns has spent the past year and nearly $100,000 fighting in court for the right to intervene in the adoption. Last month, a judge in Charlotte denied that request. Fucking pathetic.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 01:56 PM
5

That's not true. There are hundreds of children in each state's foster system that are able to be adopted. They will be older, but the state subsidises a lot of the cost, and they really need the stability of a permanent and loving home. Most US families (or single people) that adopt abroad also end up spending years and 10s of thousands of dollars, but do so because the regulations in foreign countries are so lax, and there will never be the problem of biological parents to contend with or ackn…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 01:43 PM
3

Yeah that is some real hard-hitting life-changing "research."
/r/MensRights22/05/12 01:38 PM
2

How does one get into that? I have a BA and a Master's, but they're both in liberal arts, I have no finance, engineering, or other marketable skills really.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 01:33 PM
1

Because these women don't "abandon" their children and are more like "stuck with them."?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 01:32 PM
85

If she's charged with rape (which she is) why does the headline say "having sex with." 20 year olds don't "have sex" with 7 year old.s.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:48 PM
-1

You think so? Because society really seems to have a big problem with Nadya Suleman (sp?) and pretty much any women who has multiple children if they happen to use government assistance. It's not quite the same b/c the women have custody (usuallly) but the hatred directed at them is definitely in the same "if you couldn't afford it you shouldn't have done it" vein.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:24 PM
2

I think that guy's comics are satirical...
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:22 PM
-2

That would be next to impossible. It is theoretically possible but more than likely the mother/fetus would die before it hit close to 30.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:06 PM
2

As I said, my reasons for considering moving to a foreign country are nowhere near the OP's reasons.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 07:31 PM
1

From what I saw of ASH-TR, it is not really a support system. I am not saying suicde and depresison aren't a MR issue, I believe they absolutely are, but I don't think that sub exists to discuss any of it from a male perspective, and doesn't serve to provide any help or direction for users. I am not syaing it's a bad sub in and of itself just not appropriate for her IMO.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 07:15 PM
0

Um. I clicked on your link to the sub and it doesn't have anything resembling MR in any way, and I'm not sure why you advertised it here.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 06:45 PM
1

Yes, I do consider it, but not for any reasons resembling yours. I have considered moving to the UK, Canada, France, Japan and Singapore. I feel like I'm much too old now, though, to have those sorts of adventures.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 06:40 PM
2

Yes, I don't disagree with you. I'm just saying that it might not technically be a crime, shitty as it is.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 06:36 PM
5

I just meant if it was "his" truck but she was the one who financed and had it in her name for whatever reason. /shrug
/r/MensRights21/05/12 03:24 PM
3

Interesting read. I had no idea that more males entering a field also raised wages for everyone.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:22 PM
14

What in the actual fuck? (Though the article makes it sound like the ex-wife owned the truck, hence no charges?)
/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:19 PM
1

Especially not financial advice: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_trump#Financial_problems_.281989.E2.80.9397.29 Unless we're hoping this young man ends up as a laughing stock and is reduced to hosting reality shows.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 11:46 AM
9

Trump is not the man I'd be taking life advice from.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 02:12 AM
3

"Behind every abusive man is a woman who made her that way." Re-read this. I think you a word.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 12:47 AM
24

This is silly. I wish people wouldn't publish screencaps of stupid teenagers' facebooks.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 12:46 AM
-2

It's not like I dump a gallon of Clorox on someone. I have about a 1:5 ratio of bleach to water in a small spray bottle like this: http://www.kittycatgroomer.com/images/spraybottle.jpg like what you would use to iron your pants or something. It's just a light mist, and then I wipe it off usually w/ my t-shirt or boxers.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 08:08 PM
-2

I know this is a bit unusual but if I am having casual sex I make sure they swallow my load and then brush teeth/mouthwash. If we are fucking, I dispose of the condom myself by flushing it. I knwo they say that will fuck up your plumbing but it is better to fuck up plumbing than fuck up your life for 18 years. On the rare occasions when I pull out and cum on her stomach/tits/face, I have a spray bottle of bleach diluted with water and just spray that lightly on her when I help wipe the cum up.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 03:54 PM
-13

Not the point. http://www.forbes.com/forbes-400/
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:58 PM
11

Sorry but I don't think suicide or suicide attempts should be criminalized. I cannot get behind you on this, fetus or not.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:17 PM
6

I am glad you addressed this, I am so tired of being oppressed and expected to feel guilty about being a straight white man. I m proud of who I am and have had to work very hard for everything I have.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:08 PM
-20

Most of the rich are straight white men LOL. (In the USA that is.)
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:07 PM
3

LOL yes he is pretty bad ass. I call the show: "Law and Order: Sex Crimes," though to the OP HPeroit you can't get mad that the crimes are sex crimes because that's right there in the name of the show, that it's what it's about. Like how in "Criminal Intent" he tries to get into the mind of the criminals to catch them and in "Trial By Jury" it was more about the court case than the police work.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 08:46 PM
0

Great video thanks for sharing, feminism and nazism are really one in the same. That is why there is the term "feminazi," because that is shorter than describing someone as "feminist nazi."
/r/MensRights18/05/12 08:44 PM
2

Except that in priosons rape is a crime of domination not solely getting off
/r/MensRights18/05/12 07:12 PM
1

How right you are. It would be good if men could bring unlawful birth suits to the courts and demand women be tested for birth control.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:35 PM
1

wouldn't it need a witness and notary? that could get awkward in the bedroom.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:34 PM
0

I really don't think I've ever come across one in the wild.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:16 PM
1

I think you should be supportive of him but also stay out of his business. Maybe direct him here if he wants advice.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:16 PM
3

I'll drink a lot to that. He is being set up in a 10-woman jury too, IMO.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:13 PM
1

You really like to unnecessarily editorialize your submissions. Why don't you just leave your submissions as the actual article title and then write a comment about it separately?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:11 PM
1

This just goes to show how evil and selfish some women are capable of being. That never would have happened if the mother had been at home minding her teenage children like a good mother is supposed. I think if you are a single mom you shouldn't have boyfriends or other social activities that would distract you from your parental responsibiliteis.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:09 PM
1

Breast pumps can be bought for less than $70 at Wal-Mart. Not to mention many infants are not able to breast feed and must subside on formula. At this point I am writing you off as a troll.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:07 PM
1

Oh. I can see you're basically an idiot, unaware of the economic realities that exist in 2012 that essentially require 2-income families in order to lead a meager to comfortable existence. I am not sure what sort of retrograde world you live in where the man must be the sole breadwinner, supporting a wife and his child or children, but that world disappeared thankfully about 40 years ago and I don't see it going back any time soon.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:05 PM
3

So you volunteer a few hours per week free, but anything resembling full-time status with a child you were paid. And you expect women (but not men) to forgo their careers and livelihoods because you say so? OK.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:16 AM
-6

You are so right on about this. I am vowing only to date Asian women and African women from now on.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:13 AM
1

You are right about the police and flawed lineup but I think she should also be held accountable for HER actions that put a innocent man in jail.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:11 AM
1

It sounds very much to me like the woman was being abusive to her boy friend, I was somewhat joking about "cunt punch" but I do tghink if someone hits you, you are justified in retaliating against them in an equal measure.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:09 AM
1

Well I am partial to Gertrude that is my late grandmother's name and she was a great woman.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:08 AM
1

In whjat capacity have you worked with children extensively? Did you get paid for that work or did you do it for free?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:07 AM
1

I am an MRA and consider myself an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:51 PM
1

Riley is a popular girl's name. I do think it sounds stupid and cheesy though. It is probably telling about your marriage that neither of you have been able to reach a compromise on this point. If I was a girl my dad wanted to name me Ladonna so I really dodged a boullet.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:50 PM
1

I am going to have to take exception with you on this, both of my parents worked growing up and I had a perfectly normal healthy childhood, more or less. Being a "real mother" is hardest and most rewarding, what does taht even mean? You think it's really the hardest job out there? And how is it rewarding to wipe noses and change diapers for free? I get the impression that you don't care as much about parenting as you act like. You are not attacking feminists you are attacking all women and mothe…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:48 PM
-2

I agree, as I said, I am not trying to advocate violence, however if someone is assaulting you it is your right to assault them back in an equitable way.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:44 PM
-2

That is absurd I am nothing like Joey Lawerence.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:32 PM
3

This is great. I heard it on the news on my NPR lunch break. I do hope they implement classes for prisoners on how to avoid being assaulted in prison (like maybe they can start to have private showers or whatever). They do need to have these protections in place but at the same time so many of the people accused are prison employees and I think it could just be a lot of inmates trying to say a guard assaulted them in a plea to get out earlier.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:12 PM
1

You could also create a "zine." I have the hook up at Kinko's (now FedEx kinkos) if you would need some help. Another cool thing to do (we did this at college sometimes) is to make up flyers and put them in with newspapers, magazines, and circulars. Also I have the domain http://menuniteforequality.tumblr.com/ but I am not good at web design so I have just sat on it for a long time but if you are interesting in using it let me know.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:10 PM
1

Well I think the more partners the better but I am always careful and pull out. I have only gotten someone pregnant once and I payed half of her abortion.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:42 PM
-1

O(kay well then following your argument then women and children should get welfare and men should have to pay child support. My anal polyp is also genetically human and unique, that doesn't mean I have to keep it. You can have your opinions you just have to recognize that forcing women to remain pregnant discredits any position you or MR has for men not paying child support. And yes I think anti-abortion people are extremely stupid. This is not merely a difference of opinion. If you think a woma…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:39 PM
0

But she didn't falsely accuse any one then. The false accuser did Cyrstal Magnum.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:36 PM
-7

I agree 110% percent. It is so easy for a woman to just keep getting pregnant having all the abortions she want but then she will just instead choose to leech off men or the government. I am anti-welfare and I think if we took away a lot of it these women would learn there lessons and quit sucking off the system.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:35 PM
-4

This is so true. Years ago (in high school) I was sent home for the day for wearing a Hooter's TShirt. That is not even remotely misogynistic!
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:32 PM
1

I jsut drink a lot and smoke weed and it all just kind of rolls off. :P
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:32 PM
1

What? Who did she false accuse? She should go on Register-Her. I think she lives in Brooklyn. I have friends up there who use the same local gym.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:24 PM
2

I live in a town that has a huge university athletics program. There was a young woman who was not admitted into the law school, and so her father, a big friend of the coach, enlisted the coach's help to try to get her in with the law school dean. When that didn't work out this man (the father) quit giving any money to the school. It does make me feel better that some of these schools have integrity at least.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:23 PM
-2

Honestly I think that we have had this hanging over our heads for so long, they should end it for males and start requiring draft signups for females only. And then after a period of time, end it for all.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:21 PM
0

I have been saying this to people for years now. I am tired of Uncle Tom Manginas trying to make the MRM seem more palpable or moderate, fuck that. (Sorry if that is harsh that is just how I feel.)
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:20 PM
2

Jesus will they just let anyone have a blog these days?
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:19 PM
-5

Is she being charged with anything? Are you in VA? Good luck to you, this is a good reason to never live with a woman again, they can be unstable and violent at times. Also you could start carrying mace with you in case a woman ever attacks you again, you probalby won't get arrested for using it.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:17 PM
1

Finally. I am glad these mail order brides will no longer be able to come over here to milk men out of their money and then expect legal protection.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:13 PM
3

I find this situation confusing. Does your ex-wife now have $6,300 as a pre-payment? As long as you don't have to pay for however long, I don't see what the big deal is. Maybe I am isunderstanding though.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:07 PM
-1

It makes me think it was doctored or something because of all those pictures in the front of that woman. They look like senior pictures. Maybe they are pictures of the vandal so everyone will know she did it.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:04 PM
0

So then marriage is not necessarily anti-male or pro-female it just has to be gay marriage. It would be hard to do in the USA but maybe we should outlaw straight marriage and only allow same-sex men marriage. Although to be fair you would have to have some sort of civil union or something for gay women and straight families. Do you think that polygamous marriages or better or worse for men? I can see it going both ways in that they have more wives to take them for a ride but on the other hand th…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:03 PM
1

That makese sense but they do not give welfare and contraceptives to men so I thinkk it is prejudiced.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:01 PM
1

I wish I could find the original site to you, it was to my understanding a legal contract.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:00 PM
-2

A fetus is not an infant, idiot. Anyone who does that shold be charged with assaulting the woman, not murdering a fetus.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:59 PM
0

People don't get abortions out of "convenience," they get them because they are facing an unplanned pregnancy, lack of financial support from themselves or their partners, wellbeing of existing children or future children, I am sorry if you think bringing an unwanted child in to the world is merely "inconvenient" and abortion does not "kill people." Grow up.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:58 PM
1

If two men marry each other would it still be considered anti-male? Patrimonty would be the ideal situation because then it would be purely a legal/financial arrangement.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:45 AM
3

I should clarify that I think that abortion is fine just so long as women who can afford it buy it out of their own pocket. I don't think that women on welfare should just go around fucking who they want and having abortions.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:42 AM
-1

I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what the word medical means. I am not seeing how abortion could possible be "child abuse," if anything the poor children that are born from uncaring selfish pregnant women will probably be abused because there is no male in the household.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:41 AM
0

Well abortion is technically medical but really it is not right to give people who cannot even afford healthcare FREE ABORTIONS. Just think of how ludcrous it is. I think that after a few kids they will learn their lesson and get their tubes tied, since Medicaid will pay for that.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:58 PM
1

Excuse me? Try neither. The more you are able to itemize your list of grievances toward a company, legislator, organization, etc., the better able you are to get direct results. They usually want to stop any negative publicity associated with your claims. In fact this just happened to me with a retailer and my bank after an episode of identity theft/credit fraud.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:52 PM
1

Yes the GOP is really our best bet in the USA, particulary GOP women. They just passed the VAWA plan that ensures that protections are not abused by immigrant women looking for a free ride. I think feminists' reign of terror is finally starting to come to an end.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:49 PM
2

Well this is not news to me. Fortunately I have never been raped by a woman but I have come close. Luckily it was winter and I had a large cup of cocoa that got knocked over.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:42 PM
1

What problem is there with this? You can already buy all different kinds of legal kits on the free market, why spend $1,000 each or more on lawyers for an uncontested divorce? $41 is a deal.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:40 PM
1

There is an online pledge you can take that states that you will not get married until there is equality. It is a binding contract. I signed it some time ago and of course now that I am looking for it I can't find it.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:36 PM
1

Well you cannot get a prenup before you are even going to be married so what difference does it make if you are in the process of getting your inheritance and meet someone. You have however just confessed to a premeditated mindset and the courts could easily get your online records if anything ever happened, so i would suggest deleting this. It may be too late already, though, as I have heard through the grape vine government officials monitor this site and other MR sites.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:34 PM
-6

I am confused. The ex-husband looks like a 20-year-old woman.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:30 PM
2

I think this is a good conversation to have but this link/website on the subject are purely awful. No offense but I stopped reading when he started holding up black celebrities as proof that there is no wage disparity. He should have used real data instead, that just makes his claims sound incredible and offensive (I have black and biracial family members.)
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:51 PM
0

No offense but I don't want to hear a pubescent know-it-all vlog.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:48 PM
1

Oh, I'm sorry, I understand now. Like I said I would rather a million people be raped than an innocent person go to jail for rape, as harsh as that might sound it is what our country is founded upon.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:30 PM
1

I'm still not clear on what you mean, here. Obviously I think they are harmful for innocent people as well as people who may have been raped. That's why I think the women in the article should be jailed for their false testimony.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:57 PM
1

That's true, but honestly if you read the full story their claims of being raped seem rather unlikely. Edited to add that even though I haven't been through it, I am sure being the victim of rape is horrible, but the way the U.S. system is, it is much better that a real rapist go free than for an innocent person to go to jail for it. That's the same reasoning behind why it's okay to jail rape victims if they are going to refuse to testify, because a lot more people could be raped if they don't.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:39 PM
0

Wow, that is wonderful that he was exonerated. I hope they can charge Jones and Cole...Cole possibly with murder or manslaughter since she falsely accused someone who died in prison. This just make it so much harder for other victims when women lie about who their rapists are, because the real "rapists" are out there (allegedly, anyway).
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:32 PM
-1

I agree. I know when some web site or organization makes me mad, airing of grievances always results in an outcome I prefer.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:35 PM
2

I cannot believe Justin Beiber beat out Tim allen. aka tim the toolman taylor.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:20 PM
-1

This is a really good study. I think it is why I excel professionally while some of my female peers lag. I am very goal-oriented and like to take one task at a time and see it through rather than many of my coworkers who not only get bogged down with work by trying to do a bit of everything, also find time to socialize on company time and attend to their family needs (like even breastfeeding!) also on company time.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:19 PM
5

Being anti-feminist does not mean being anti-woman. feminists have a lot of responsibility pushing legislation and the like, so while women still don't have the numbers in government, the feminist lobby pushes men to make anti-male changes.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:15 PM
1

Is she suggesting that she murders her husband? Why are the husband and son on boxes (or carton) but the daughter and boyfriend (who is more than likely than gay if in playgirl) are on magazines? Does facebook know that "melanie lee drake" is posting such violent stuff? I am sure that is a violation of the facebook agreement. I tried to report this but her page is private.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:49 PM
5

I'm right there with you. If medicaid dollars will not cover abortion they should not cover circumcision. Right now I think it varies state by state but it really should be a national ban. I don't even want a penny of my money going to fund circumcision. Edit: I spell wrong.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:34 PM
1

This is sort of an odd project, but I'll throw a few dollars their way. I am glad someone has finally attempted to capture the male perspective on the penis organ.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:31 PM
0

While youre at it you need to google Cameron Diaz and plastic surgery too. Honestly I think you are at this point willfully ignorant. Hollywood and the rest of the entertainment industry (not just women but men too) are complacent in the mutilation of millions of infant boys to propogate their creams and serums and injections.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:18 PM
4

That's funny, since I thought it was always the Mustang owners that did the blowing.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:16 PM
3

What sort of horrible mother would even consider this without asking a doctor?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:25 PM
6

Well you are from reddit so i take your word for it.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:23 PM
0

I am sorry that screen shot still makes no sense to me, especially since men and women are both coaches and teachers and neither should molset anyone. Plus the web site it is supposed to be for doesn't really work.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:23 PM
2

I am tired of dealing with you. Please learn to use google. It is very widely known that foreskins are taking the place of animal testing in pharma, bioengineering (yes) as well as cosmetics testing due to animal cruelty and lobbying by anti-male organizations like peta. But I guess that cruelty to infant boys are okay.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:22 PM
1

I think this quote from ghandi applies. He is most well-known for being an anti-cololonial organizer but i think he would support the mens' rights movement too: ""First they ignore us, then they riducule us, then they fight us, then we win"."
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:18 PM
1

What were the charges? What was he convicted of? What is his sentnace.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:15 PM
3

Thank you for sharing this. My girlfriend was hospitalized twice last year and has been pushing for marriage somewhat ever since then because of the medical rights. It is something i have thought about as my parents were also both very sick years ago. My dad died but my mother was able to recover but there were so many legal issues to deal with. It makes marriage very unappealing, not to mention the prospect of losing my car home dog etc.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:13 PM
2

You know "Wing Nut daily" rare gets it right, but this time It Hit the nail on the head. Everyone should have known civil rights for straight white men would have been infringed upon when he won the election.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:10 PM
7

Where did you get that iomages? You can probably run the plate through the state registry to see if it's valid.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:08 PM
-1

Why on earth would women coaches wear skirts? Even WNBA coaches wear pants.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:05 PM
-1

And cosmetic testing. Tell me she doesn't use cosmetics.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:03 PM
2

Yeah I am not really sure what he was getting at. I mean both of my claims seem pretty self-ivedent.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:28 PM
2

SkinMedica, promoted by Oprah, is hardly a "weird brand." Are you a plant for the make-up industry or something? SkinMedica is not the only company profiting from human foreskins. Since the 1980's many hospitals have been providing infant foreskins to a number of bio-research laboratories, pharmaceutical companies, and of course cosmetic companies...http://voices.yahoo.com/human-foreskins-big-business-cosmetics-201840.html The ingredient you are looking for is likely called Tissue Nutrient Solut…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:27 PM
8

Yes, it truly is outrageous. I don't see what comon ground their could be. they apparently do such beneficial stuff might actually be of some importance to the original owner! Good point and something I never even thought of, thank you.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:31 PM
6

I don't think it's a ridiculous assumption to make that a multimillionaire film star uses cosmetics and other beauty products containg or tested on foreskins. It is rampant, actually.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:28 PM
1

I went to a single-sex parochial school from k-8. It has been so long now I only really have vague memories. We only had a few male teachers, though, one of whom was let go for allegedly molesting boys in the middle-grades. I can't remember if he was only quietly let-go or if he was fired and police were involved. It was a catholic school so I am inclined to think it was the former. It's also really hard to say the difference between single-sex and co-ed since I was a teenager by the time I had …
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:09 PM
17

It's a ford so "he" probably got the better end of the deal.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:06 PM
3

For what. That women are coaches? Or that women can be sexual predators?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:02 PM
3

http://www.alternet.org/environment/47421 http://www.newser.com/story/105231/babies-foreskins-turned-into-beauty-products.html
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:01 PM
1

Well I disagree about the condoms but I think the USA does make it too easy for divorce, especailly since women are the ones who initiatve it most of the time.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:59 PM
1

Oh that is terrible, I guess it would not be fair to have financial abortion if there is not biological abortion.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:40 PM
3

I think I have seen this image before. Shopped.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:27 PM
2

Have an upvote for beating me to this. I am rather interested in Riding Mower, but would likely be distressed smell Man Town.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:27 PM
3

It absolutely disgusts me how acceptable it has become to discriminate against straight white men. This just did not happen back before second wave feminism and the civil rights movement. It is good we have learned not do discriminate against others, but they should do the same to us in return.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:25 PM
3

I can't believe a woman would be so cruel. LEarning her daughter at a young age, huh?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:24 PM
0

I am not young but I like getting absolutely hammered sometimes. Not as much as when I was in university, but still. This study really says it all, though. Girls should be more careful and not drink if they want to be able to clearly say "no."
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:22 PM
1

Do they have financial abortion in Ireland? I mean there is no way of knowing how many people those women have slept with, they could just name whomever and expect to get money.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:21 PM
-2

While I am glad she has spoken against it, I think she is probably a hypocrite considering all the beauty products she must use that contain foreskins.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:19 PM
7

Wow your wife sounds like a total shrew. I hope you have left her by now. It is highly inappropriate for a spouse to blackmail in a marriage.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:17 PM
1

We give up time we could spend honing our skills, something most of us enjoy tremendously and offers us great return on investment, to be with them. Something that offers little or no return on investment. Besides sex. Then we have to listen to how they'd like us to get even less return on investment and make sure they get even more of what they want. Ha ha ha, I need to find a way to parlay this in to women paying to have sex with me. Right on, buddy.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:16 PM
4

This is really getting over the top. I read the articles when they came out earlier in the year and thought they couldn't get any worse but apparently I was wrong.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:15 PM
5

This is just really typical of this organization. They are at the forefront of the domestic violence industry and I am glad to see them called out for the profiteers they are by you. Upvote.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:07 PM
2

I am not sure what this is advertising (the link in the screen shot doesn't work), but I think you should keep in mind that women are also coaches and also likely to rape or sexually molest someone so I think it is saying watch out for women too. (Keep in mind all the teachers who molest their students - they are also often women.)
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:02 PM
6

I did not read that, do you have a link? He obviously will not get $1M from a simple maid, but I think his point is spot-on. He was in line to be the French president and lost it all because of her lies.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 09:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter