TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

geon2k2 Archive

View 0 posts and 125 comments by geon2k2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Real life doesn't work like that mate. In fact if we reach such a situation that only 1 man remains, the whole world is destroyed and there is nothing to eat, nowhere to hide, probably air is unbreathable and water contaminated. Nobody would be thinking about reproduction, but about survival. We are no longer in the garden of Eden. So this whole exercise is to prove that somehow women are more valuable than men in a highly unlikely made up scenario. To go back to the garden of Eden, we are all d…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 08:49 PM
2

Except there are 4 billion women in the world, they are not rare and don't deserve special priviledge. Even in that hypothetical scenario, everybody thinks purely from reproductive perspective, but things are waay more complicated. What if they are on an island with no crops, no potato, no corn seeds. What if there are wild animals? Who will feed and protect 100 women all pregnant. And then if they do carry to term, who will feed and protect 200 human beings. Do you see how ridiculous that assum…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 07:03 AM
3

We kinda have red vs blue states already. Young men voting predominantly red, young women predominantly blue. People just need to move around to the correct state which represents them. You want DEI, social wellfare, higher taxes, you go blue, you want traditional family, lower taxes, you go red. Its simple.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 04:12 AM
1

Oh, no street protests this time ...
/r/MensRights30/08/24 10:42 AM
6

Considering women nowadays don't make kids, don't marry, they should definetly be recruited. The standard social contract was broken long ago.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:21 AM
9

Maybe they should stop systemically discriminating agains men. People are angry because discrimination is real and visible for everyone. This is another succesfull result of feminism which exceeded any decent limit.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 04:19 AM
8

Actually is exactly the oposite. Left has trasfered more wealth from men to women than anybody in history. Any form of socialism does exactly that, transfers wealth from men to women. Look it up. There is a study from new zeeland which basically states that women in average is costing society ~175k $, that is how much they receive from the state minus how much they pay in taxes. Why? multiple issues, like working less hours, while they work, receiving pension and medical care for 3 times more ye…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 05:58 AM
1

Men retire at an earlier age Later not earlier.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 04:18 AM
1

Feminism is partially to blame for this as well. Men which are not integrated in society are dangerous. They don't have whom to fight for, what to work for and on top of that have nothing to lose. This was known since long ago, wiking hoardes, were nothing else than young men, without a spouse and kids, which were sent to pilleage other vilages, usually kill the men and get themselves wifes. If these trends of separation between sexes, will continue, it will get even worse.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 07:33 AM
8

If you prefer it as audiobook, unoficial version is here
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:06 PM
3

There will never ever be a political party which will promote men rights, as 55% of the voting base is female. No women will vote againts her benefits even if she thinks men are discriminated against. Even men with daughters will vote against any men rights as men would rather sacrifice themselves than their daughters. The best thing a man can do is vote right to at least slow the wealth transfer going from men to women, through state, which happens in any slightly socialist country. see this ve…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 05:58 AM
18

Man are defective again ... lets fix them by forcing them yo go to army and waste 1 year of their youth. Great. ‘Men’s Behavior Change’ task force from Australia should take notice.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:53 AM
5

Never said that was a fair arrangement, just pointed out, that it might not be as bad as it looks. And its not my idea, its from that book. If no kids are involved, then such arrangement will never work as one spouse is esentially sucking resources from the other one. If kids are involved there should be a better arrangement, but thats up to them, and it depends on many factors, on whether she wiil work part time, school kids or not, have an additional person which cleans, cooks, kids will go to…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 03:53 AM
57

You should read "The manipulated men" by esther vilar. Giving up the career and having someone care for you is a priviledge not a sacrifice. Its a priviledge to stay at home and raise your children. Most men will gladly do that as well, if there would be someone to care for them, and not have to work and comute for 10-12h/day and follow instructions of in many cases a lousy boss.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 06:02 PM
7

People are paid the same. If somebody can handle problematic patients and somebody else cant, that person is more valuable and therefore should be paid more, isn't it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/24 04:04 AM
1

Used to be pro choice until i saw a testimony from a doctor which does these procedures. He described in detail how the kid skull is crushed, how the whole body is retrieved piece by piece, and assembled nearby to make sure they got out everything. Imagine getting half leg here, right hand there, torso there, this piece of the skull here. Its inimaginable to do something like this to a human. And its done 72 mil times per year. People should use contraception, and only in extreme cases, like gen…
/r/MensRights29/07/24 04:26 AM
66

Step 1. Make him watch the procedure, which is absolutely barbaric. Live without anestesia. A helpless kid tied tight on both legs and hands screeaming while being cut. Only a psyhopath would do that to another human. Weirdly enough you can find it on yt as well. Step2. Make him research the failure rate. There is a 5-10% failure rate, and complications. And there have been many cases with the organ split open. Basically there is a high chance for that kid to never have kids or function as a nor…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 04:03 AM
4

We should fight either to eliminate pensions altogether or for people to contribute proportionally to the expected number of years the pension should be paid after retirement. Example. Women retire 50, die 70 in average. Man retire 60, die 65. Women benefit 20 years, men 5. Pension contribution for women should be 4 times more expensive for the same salary. As it is now men subdidize women pension all around the globe. It was not a big issue if most men would get married and had kids, as they wo…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:29 PM
13

Grouping women and children in the same category was briliant from feminists side. Men should definetly look at ways to decouple women from children, they are in very distinct categories.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 12:51 PM
23

I think its not ethical to have a woman as president and commander chief of the army considering women do not participate in drafting and most miliyary activities, but here we are. Equal rights=Equal responsibilities. Giving only rights without the responsibilities was the dumbest things our grandfathers did.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:34 AM
4

Registration for drafting mandatory for women. It should be illegal to vote without it. Voting only allowed for those which pay taxes at least relative to the minimum salary and have net contribution. Modify the law so that all benefits/obligations applicable to men will apply to women and vice versa. It should basically be illegal to have a law only for women or only for men. Obviously no law should include body parts or things which differentiate between sexes. Abortion law is the only one whi…
/r/MensRights23/07/24 03:07 AM
1

See here Women kill about 72 mil people per year, through abortions. What Hitler, Stalin, Mao combined did pales in comparison with what women do anually. What is more crazy is that they can also kill born babies of up to 1 year old without the act being considered a murder in some countries. See this for example.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:20 AM
1

Few women are doing better, the wast majority of them are doing worse, but its ok, if they want equality, we should push this narative to the extreme, until they loose all the priviledges they still have and we are trully equal.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:47 PM
1

Its embeded in the very fabric of society, even beyond voting. UN dictates countryes what to do, without anyone being able to vote. And UN has a very strong feminism agenda. see this video On top of this yes men fought, for women, against men all the time. There are some men which signed a document saying that they opreseed women, and imposed tyranny on them, and that all men are bad. Probably highly manipulated men. it days here somewhere. Anyway, the world revolves around money and sex, and es…
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:32 AM
7

Find a way to un-girlfriend her, but in a nice way. Maybe give her the ick, have her leave you, be lazy, tell her you lost your job if you are not living together, stop shaving or wearing deodorant, wear bad clothes when you are with her, i don't know be creative and get out as fast as possible. The fact that she is on that group, even without posting anything, should be an eye opener for you.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 04:33 AM
-1

Very interesting do you have a source which describes the process?
/r/MensRights12/07/24 04:20 AM
2

Some men are not even allowed legally to protest. In my country, if you are in, police, firefighters, army, and i'm sure there are more, it is illegal to go on strike and not do your duty.
/r/MensRights11/07/24 03:46 AM
3

Unfortunatelly in the crazy world we live in, the fact that the women said so, is proof enough in this kind of cases.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 07:11 PM
9

Because guess who votes for social security and support imigration. First increases taxes so lower pay, second increases labor supply so lower pay.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 06:20 AM
10

Look into "gamma bias". first article on search result
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:46 AM

Free speech is not related to democracy. Uk has democracy but the free speech is not so free as in the us. Its sort of limitations apply*. I don't know what the solution is, but logically if 55-60% of voters, counting only women, don't care about men issues, then men issues will never be solved. Especially that some of them like draft or paternity tests are directly agains them. Representative leadership is fine, but democracy in which the most ilitetate person has the same voting rights as ever…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 09:53 AM

They can't. It will be political suicide for them. Not only because there are more women voters but women are more likely to go and vote. In the end there are 5-10% more women voters. On top of this, society will frown about it, they might be called mysoginists, they might have wifes or daughers and what about the millions of young thirsty men which will do anything to please a woman only to get some access. Men issues cannot be solved by democracy. Those aware that there is an issue are a tiny …
/r/MensRights06/07/24 06:07 AM

Women were explicitly barred from serving in combat in the US until 2013. I pray to god that my son will be discriminated in that way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/24 03:42 AM
4

Western society will colapse, and it will be probably conquered. It happen before, in Rome durin the fall of the Roman empire, in Bagdad during the fall of the Arab empire, whenever women got to dominate society. But the change is always external, some foreign invador comes, its not happening from within.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 05:02 AM
0

Probably they will torture you psychologically a bit before, just to "educate" you a bit, or they will threaten or jail your family. Probably they will confiscate everything you have, they will take whatever practice license you have. There are ways to bring you in line.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 04:19 PM
3

Why not watch the original instead of watching somebody else, commenting and banging a buck as well, for something other people did.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 12:58 PM
2

So lets keep mothers and daughters at home, and send the rest of the women, which don't want to be mothers. This way nobody would get demoralized isn't it?
/r/MensRights10/05/24 05:04 AM
3

Until 1977 women (in Germany) needed the consent of their husbands to be able to work or open and close a bank account. Wouldn't he also be liable and go to prison if she incurred debt? Man was responsible for its wife wrong doings and thats why that system was in place.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 04:10 AM
1

Don't know about us, but in eastern europe up to mid 18th century, most of us were serfs, under a lord. No ownership of any kind, working the land for that lord in exchange for a hut and food. Not really slaves, but not far from it. If men got some rights few years earlier its insignificany and irelevant in the grand scheme of things.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 04:05 AM
10

Top answer. Focus on you guys, on what you like. Travel, maybe plan to retire early. If a top notch women will come along, fine, if not not, but don't settle. And be very carrefull with the ones which are on their phone day and night, those are more likely to have been corrupted, and cause problems later on.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 03:45 AM
1

Envy?
/r/MensRights09/05/24 03:21 AM
8

Insulting ... check Sexist ... check Stupid ... check In their opinion men are more dangerous, agressive, less capable of self control than bears. If thats not insulting i don't know what. But lest say ... fine ... lets do a quick ... napkin math. A women going by subway, working in an office, doing groceries, has at least 100 encounters with men per day. She will be permanently surounded by men, some will only pass by, some will glance at her, some will even touch her, some will speak with her,…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:14 PM
2

Its not even close to twoX, don't kid yourself. Non stop generalizarion bashing men non stop toxic sintagms like "obligatory not all men but". Non stop fake stories, non stop of he touched me i think i've been SA. Oh my doctor looked at me he must be a mysoginist. I'm in shock that subredit is allowed to exists and even more in shock if you look at how many millions of users it has.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:09 AM
7

At this rate they will loose everything they "fought" for. Waiting with interest to see what countries which will start shrinking rapidly in the coming years will do. Looking at Japan, SK, Italy, Germany. Some countries already started taking rights away. See abortion for example in US, Poland. Also, some say that Talibans took back Afganistan so fast, because the army didn't want to fight for the women rights among others.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:50 AM
32

Don't confuse sexual assault with the other thing. These women consider touching them on their hand or back SA. Department of justice in the US had something like 1 in 60. What used to circulate on the net with 1 in 5 and 1 in 6 was absolute garbage. Check your sources and metodology for obtaining those numbers.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 12:09 PM
22

If you can, move on. That clearly is not a good place to work. My company is also getting there, at warp speed. I've resisted in many meetings, and never said anything, precisely because i'm affraid, that, too many fingers will point at me afterwards.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 11:43 AM
5

When man are involved its always people, when women are involved its clearly women. Get used to it, this is how the world works. If they didn't say x people died out of which y women and children, always asume x is 100% men.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:38 AM
4

I'm all for men rights, but there is a 2 months old child there. If you were thinking for many years about divorce, how did that happen? Can't you wait a little longer, maybe until that kid will be 5 or something?
/r/MensRights06/05/24 03:16 AM
9

This kind of discrimination is a good reason NOT to fight for a country as clearly its values are messed up. What is this? To some citizens you offer consulate services to some you don't? Women are first class citizens, men second class citizens, and on top of that you expect the second class citizens to fight and die for such "values"? Are they insane? They don't see anything wrong with it?
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:35 AM
1

or you could send them various random articles about bear encounters such as this one. Yeah its a ridiculous question. There are bad things a man can do to a woman, but a bear will straight out eat her. And no, you can rarely outsmart a hungry bear which has a fine sense of smell and can run much faster than you. With the man at least you have a chance that he will feed and protect you.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 01:49 PM
3

Do you have a link, which talks about this?
/r/MensRights25/04/24 02:10 PM
3

Sit on your couches don't vote and see what happens. Just saying as there was a post about elections earlier.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 04:05 AM
6

2 issues. Will men which don't have children have to contribute to this fund? Probably yes, and if so, this is another wealth redistribution strategy, in which everybody pays, but only some women will benefit. Maybe they will be married, maybe they divorce after getting the allowance, maybe they will remarry, maybe they make more children with other men, we don't know, what we know for sure, guaranteed 100% is that a women will be at the receiving end. Lower class, low income families might take…
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:32 PM
14

Let them be single, without men subsidizing their pension and state wellfare. I'd be very interested to see how happy will they be when starving, and sleeping out under the stars. 10% of white colar women which can trully sustain themselves, are not all women.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 05:16 AM
1

Women can work as much as they want, nobody wants to be a "provider" for the sake of being a provider. But they should deserve their jobs, not be highered just because they are women and the company targets whatever percentage. Quotas can only be achieved by discriminating against men. All this, while there is no such quota in blue collar jobs. If you want equality, fine lets have it, everywhere, although that system was typically called comunism. I'm very much frustrated about male only conscri…
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:58 AM
3

Yeah, and increase pay and benefits, until they find people willing to do the work.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 08:26 AM
8

Tax increases will be the biggest issue for men. These countries will have a very high median age, and due to high number of old people, will all be socialist. They are already very old. 49 Japan, 48 Italy, 47 Germany. USA probably due to imigration is not that bad at only 38 median age. Do you realize what this means? Half of Germany population is over 47 years old. All these are dieing countries. Young people will be affected by taxes, and as men work more and at higher paying jobs, men more t…
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:13 AM
1

Statistically 4/5 women have children but only 2/5 men have. This means 3/5 men pay education for children which are not theirs. Statistically women live in average 6 years more than men. While aparently not a big issue, when you consider retirement age, and depending on the country, and life expectancy women receive disproportionatly more pension then men, while paying the same or less. As per statista website, in 2022, in eastern europe life expectancy for men was 68, for women 77, retirement …
/r/MensRights10/04/24 09:32 AM
0

True but participation rate in elections has been anywhere between 30 to 70% some elections being so close that every single vote counts. And there are 52% women who vote in most countries, however a lot of them have boys as kids, some of them, only boys, and some even realized boys and men have an issue. There are books on how to raise boys written by women, which recognize some of the aspects mentioned by Richard Reeves. I've seen mothers being happy that one of her sons found a good wife in a…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 08:34 PM
10

It is only when it crashes will things change. Not if the police will control everything that breaths. This is how comunism handled its citizens, through some form of police, security services.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 04:40 AM
32

Men should be careful to politics and vote. Disengagement is fine, but if only women will vote it will get worse and worse for men, especially. Men will end up slaving for socially assisted women, paying education for children are not theirs and so on. This is already happening to some extent, and wealth transfer is happening through taxation.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 04:36 AM
1

Thats actually not good either. You end up sleeping in separate rooms, with separate bank accounts and adrift as 2 captains cannot control a ship.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 06:21 AM
2

Womens have no place in the military and in combat, they are litteraly too weak, and will be a burden, but they shoul be conscripted to make food, take care of army gear, work if factories producing amunition, nursing, or any medical field and helping the war effort in different ways. A well fead army, with fresh clothers, well maintained gear and good medical care will go a much longer distance.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 04:19 AM
1

Men in the west go to est to get a decent women. Men in the est come to west to cover the jobs men in the west no longer do. Crazy world. Those men from the est will not buy homes in the west though, and they will also not mary western women. So its not the same, and this is not sustainable for decades.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:01 AM
1

Increase in breadwinner status also means that you're going to do more household chores as a man. Which chores. Pushing the button on the clothes/dish washing machines? All that, in exchange for never working? Sign me in, please.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 04:55 AM
3

I noticed another interesting aspect, which mostly women do. Generalization. My boyfriend does that, therefore all men do that. A men did something, therefore all men do that.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 04:09 PM
2

Oh the irony. Now that they lost some rights, they need alies. When they had rights they never realised men don't have any.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 04:03 PM
1

Let them. A women gets its value from the children it brings in this world. Thats what make them special and powerful. Without that, a woman is generally worth less than a man. Weaker fizically, moody due to not having stable hormones, not so resilient, under stress they produce cortisol, while men produce more testosterone. Despite them saying they are better comunicators, they are not because women use indirect language and go around the subject, while men clearly and directly state what they …
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:00 PM
1

I hope real men will go on strike to leave these entitled women without water and electricity, for couple of days. Maybe some sense will come into them.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 06:05 PM
1

Yes mate, they are more rare, but there are plenty. So many in fact that their rarity means nothing. That was the point i was trying to make. And in fact most women in the west use 1 of those few hundred eggs, so they don't bring as much value as they are granted.
/r/MensRights28/03/24 04:47 AM
-2

People need to stop with this excuse. Sure, on a deserted island a women is more valuable than a man. But we are not on a deserted island. There are more than 4 billion women around. Each carrying ~400 eggs through her life, but lets say ~200, in her prime, adult life. Each woman can do a hell lot of babies. Way more than this plannet can sustain. In the end yes, they are more rare, but there are plenty. So many in fact that their rarity means nothing.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 07:07 PM
3

Because there is a need for men in other parts, like maintaining critical infrastructure, construction, plumber, electricians, etc. Men can and will do both stem and those jobs, women wont, they like nice, clean air conditioned offices. If you manage to push men out of air conditioned offices, some of them will eventually get jobs in those ares as well. Think about it, if you leave men alone, they also prefer office work. If men won't maintain infrastructure and women won't then who will do it?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:18 AM
1

Next time, tell her, how many years you went through school, what you did to get a job, how much you work at the job, how much you paid for the car if the case, how much you worked in the gym and in general how much time, money and sweat you invested just for the priviledge to date her. Without those she would not be there with you. Then she can compare that, with some makeup, which btw you did not ask for, and if she was trully beautiful she would not even need.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 08:43 AM
2

Cops getting a taste of their own medicine. Hopefully, next time they get called, they'll remember that watever the women says must be true, even if there is no evidence.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 06:44 AM
106

Preferably nobody should be conscripted, but if its a must everybody who votes should be conscripted. My worry is that women will be pushed into management and higher ranking officers, will not see real combat and will command the men on the field. If women conscription is not done properly it can be even worse than it is today.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 05:09 AM

I didn't say its not a resource, i said its not a rare resource. The men who built the house you live in, the road, the car you drive in or working at the power plant which brings you electricity are also a resource. Stop making such a big deal about giving birth. This is what females are desinged for. Look at the animal world, to see how its done. Even for humans 7 out of 9 months you live absolutely normal life, and dying from child birth is unheard of in modern world. You have a higher risk o…
/r/MensRights21/03/24 04:58 AM

True, if there would be one female left, but there are 4+ billion, so its not like its a rare resource. Anyway women in the west don't make kids, do this whole discussion is irelevant. A women which does not have kids contributes to society in average probably less than a man. A man at least does the hard work to build and keep the infrastructure running.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 05:46 PM
8

We test first on men for the same reason we test first on mice. Men as mice are expendable mate.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:12 AM

This part has always been true, however it was worth it in the past. The quality of women was much better. More kids, better cooks, better care for kids and husbands, lower divorce rates, lower body count, thinner, mote feminine, women used to wear skirts not patnts and not be so entitled. Women nowadays are the worst they have ever been in the last century.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 04:58 AM
3

The discrimination is in the other sense. If women are so good and desirable, why do companies have employment "diversity" quotas. To be able to hire women by discriminating against men, in the name of diversity that's why. Men don't need quotas, and never requested quotas for themselves.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 07:45 PM
2

But there is a logistical roadblock. The sheer volume added to blood labs, would simply overwhelm the labs, delaying potentially life saving tests for people. Thats absolutely false. Human nowadays have in average 1-2 kids in their whole lifetime. Extra load on blood tests laboratory is nothing, it will probably not even be noticed. Also a lot of blood tests just check for vitamins or other welbeing parameters, if they are delayed for 1 day nobody will die.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 04:08 PM
16

Fine you don't want to draft women, but whats wrong if women would at least pay a tax for the war efforts? Do women there really want to be freeloaders until the end?
/r/MensRights15/03/24 05:19 AM
6

But still better than a huge number ( double digit %) of women leaving the country and joining other countries, and saying with a straight face they will never return, like it happen in Ukraine.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 11:13 AM
3

Which democracy mate. We live under the tirany of minorities
/r/MensRights14/03/24 11:10 AM
1

Both were drunk, Enough said. I understand laws are miserable and agains men in this situation, but why do you have to get drunk? And why should other man feel simpathy for a drunk influencer. In the same way we tell fat women they ate fully responsible for what they put in their mouth, we can tell drunk men that they are fully responsible for what they drink.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 05:04 AM
6

19 nov is world toilet day according to UN and it is not recocnized as international men day by the media. Pretty hard to celebrate it.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 05:08 AM
6

There is a difference, but much smaller than the current numbers. If i'm not mistaken in 1920 the gap was closer to 1-2 years, and even then the same factors, which shorten life, applied for men. Since then the difference kept increasing through the years. Which means we as men have built a better world for women than we did for men.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 05:01 AM
82

Women are in power in any democratic society. There are at least 5% more women with voting rights than men in any democratic country on earth. Not only that but they are more involved and more likely to go to vote, which probably raises the difference to at least 10%.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 03:37 PM

Agree, no women can possibly comprehend what issues men face. She is just saying what people want to hear to profit from that. Many women youtubers are like that. Because they are not sincere, if you listen enough they will slip sometimes and say stupid things only a woman which doesn't understand can say.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 03:31 PM
0

In europe bolt has a service called "women for women", and nobody sees any issue with that ...
/r/MensRights10/03/24 03:27 PM
68

It is like this or variations everywhere. Even if retirement age will be the same, women will benefit for pension for a period 2,3 times longer than men. Effectively, men are also subsidizing women pension. Amd btw this big difference is not due to genes but due to the fact that men live more stressfull lifes, and work in more dangerous professions. Imagine the quantity of construction materials, gases, dust or other chemicals inhaled, or long 12h+ shifts, or work in high magnetic environments, …
/r/MensRights10/03/24 03:20 PM
11

Yeah interesting. 6 feb - day for zero tolerance for female genital mutilation, while for men it is best practice
/r/MensRights10/03/24 06:18 AM
17

you can always scroll and find someone cooler or hotter or richer, That is why all men should quit dating apps. There is no incentive for men to be on those dating apps. Women get free validation and then get to compare the men from their comunity, from which they would normally have to choose from, with chads across the country or even on other continents. If you trully think you are that chad sure stay, otherwise do yourself a favor and quit the apps, start doing things the old way. When only …
/r/MensRights09/03/24 07:30 PM
2

Do you have a list of the 11 days?
/r/MensRights09/03/24 06:56 PM
6

“Wars, thats just men wanting to kill another men, if there were more women leaders, wars wouldnt exist!” Wars are done for many reasons: to preserve security, force balance, culture, language, law system, freedoms, control varions resources such as food, oil, gas, land, all of which women benefit from. Nobody wants to fight just for the sake of fighting. If there will be only women in the world and one tribe had food and the other didn't what do those women think it would happen?
/r/MensRights09/03/24 06:05 AM
8

Look for James Sexton, he has a book "if you're in my office its already too late" and few videos on yt in which he discusses various aspects, including prenup, renewal every few years, and so on.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 06:54 PM
6

What a crappy article. He shows interest by paying ... wow, how about he shows interest by being there with you. These women, they really want to have it all.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 05:48 AM
2

Do you have some articles/studies about it?
/r/MensRights07/03/24 08:34 PM
71

Thing is the camera was not hidden it was a phone which that guy was holding in his hand, and nobody objected while the filming hapen.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 05:53 AM
23

There is also a book "This is your brain on birth control", in which among others it says that when women stop taking the pill they might not be attracted anymore to the same person they liked while under the pill, and they will prefer a more masculine man. So this is known for quite sometime.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 05:39 AM
0

I'm sorry but "the boys are retarded" is not an argument I'm disapointed in you calling boys retarded just because of the way humans evolved over millions of years. Boys develop motor skills faster than mental skils and reach puberty later because this is what it was necesary for the human species to evolve and exist as it is today. Education system is a human construct which doesn't take into account human development. This is the problem and this needs to change. There is far more to life than…
/r/MensRights07/03/24 05:30 AM
3

That won't help, because girls reach puberty faster so their brain develops faster, and thats part of the school system problem as well. Once boys reach puberty the gap vanishes, but this happens about 1-3 years later. Also they are less energetic and are able to sit still in a classroom for longer, while boys are more active and being punished for this as well. Richard Reeves speaks more about this issue. Please follow him. He is not brave enough to cover all topics, but he does cover some of t…
/r/MensRights06/03/24 04:47 PM
2

Hopefully women will realise that it is in their best interest to have strong and involved men. A man without a wife or kid or who feels marginalised or even discriminated against is not only very dangerous for society, but will most likely not participare in the labor force, not do any of the dangerous but critical jobs tipically only men do, not participate in the army. He has no incentive to defend this system.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 10:23 AM
-1

All is good. Let them earn more i don't mind. In fact a lot of men don't mind as men participation in the workforce is steadily declining for decades. men workforce participation And in fact why would men struggle? We need very little to be happy. In general women need expensive vacations, big houses, jewelry, cars, even men buy them to impress or atract women, not that they need it. Considering the above should't women work harder and earn more. So let them enjoy. Anyway i hear women control 85…
/r/MensRights05/03/24 06:38 AM
8

:) Thats true. There is a book "a world without men" by Aaron Clarey. Just found about it and listened a small portion of it on yt, and it was exactly about sanitation. He was saying that because there is a very small number of women working in this field the number of toilets will be extremly low with queues longer than the bread queues in comunist times, making them impractical, as nobody can hold it for that long. So he was saying that the only option was for everybody to do its stuff all aro…
/r/MensRights03/03/24 12:43 PM
181

Not only that it is not celebrated but "International men day" overlaps with "world toilet day", due to one of the most anti-men organization on earth the UN. international men day. world toilet day That clearly states the world opinion on men.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 04:25 AM
18

Looks like masked single motherhood subsidy.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 03:32 AM
8

You see there is no equivalent to unwomen and the fact that an organization for women exists and one for men doesn't, tells you lound and clear in which kind of world we live. This is becoming the norm around the globe. Some countries have a minister for women, taxis only for women, subways carts only for women, we are becoming a society more segregated than ever. I'm really worried for the new generation of men.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 03:29 AM
1

So many things you say are incorrect. Crash dumies are an average size, they don't cover most men in western society, as they are larger, they cover kids separately, but not infants or all ages, thats not build for men, its build for average human. You would have to crash hundreds of cars and dumies to cover all sizes, across the globe. Men in many countries in asia are smaller than the average women in the west. Heart atacks i don't know and don't want to bother to search now,because i know med…
/r/MensRights28/02/24 07:25 PM
89

But what did he win? The chance to be a provider? I guess sex. He didn't have the looks going for him. All men should understand sex will dry up pretty fast in a marriage, especially in your cousin case if you say he isn't particularly attractive and on top of that she is into fuckboys. There is no obligation anywhere for the women to provide sex, cook, clean, work or anything else for that matter. All obligations in a marriage are on men.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 06:02 AM
2

Yes discrimination against women still exists but if you're going read it into every situation then it will never end. So,where is this discrimination? At my work place i mostly see discrimination agains men.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 01:09 PM
7

This is another stereotype, that because men are stronger they must be commiting more agressions. However women agression involve plates, glasses, knives, forks, etc, thrown at men. Why everybody asumes it is always a bare empty hand confrontation. We are were we are and were able to fight volves and bears because we use tools not because we are stronger than a bear.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 07:47 PM
67

This is actually a good counter to "it's not all men, but its always men", argument.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 11:05 AM
8

Yes, i'd love to see equality in army, construction sites, garbage colectors, sports, yeah gender neutral leagues, everywhere, not where is convenient, mixed, when not separate leagues. Women only want equality in office, white collar jobs, all the rest, and the most demanding, difficult and dangerous jobs, let the men do it, isn't it? Where is the equality you are promoting? Why women don't fight for equality in those blue collar jobs as well? Even in the white ones, women demand 50-50 employme…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 04:00 PM
7

Here is a question for you all? Why isn't the woman receiving equal pay if she can do the job as well as a man. You lost me here, and i don't think you should come with such nonsense on this redit group. There are countless studies which say that it is in fact not true, and there are multiple reasons for the pay gap, most of them being related to the type of work women chose to do, and how many hours/ effort they are willing to invest. In fact nowadays in many fields men are being discriminated …
/r/MensRights22/02/24 07:12 AM
0

Well kids are something. But if you or her don't want kids, then marriage is completly not worth it.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 05:30 PM
49

Another intersting aspect is that the women can choose to go to war by voting, and then don't participate in that war. Look no further than the current event in ukraine. Milions of women which fled the country when the war started, actually voted for the current leaders, however they asume no responsibility for their vote. Normally all of them should have stayed to fight, to defend their beliefs, and their vote. Edit: That page 30 is gold. Thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 06:30 AM
1

You can start with "the myth of male power" by warren farrell and "of boys and men" by richard reeves.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 12:11 PM
26

We are all also subsidizing women pension. In my country at least men live in average 5 years after retirement, women close to 15. In order to make it fair men should pay 1/3 of the pension women pay. In other countries situation will be different but i'm pretty sure women benefit at least 2 timen more from pension than men.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 08:59 AM
1

Except when some of them run out of water, food, fertilizer, oil or anything else, or when maybe their neighbour wants to "borrow" something that belongs to them. Who knows maybe they ran out of medicine, internet or ... makeup.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 01:31 PM
3

Myth of male power. Please ask them to read it. Men have always been at the bottom of the society and the sacrificed gender, in war, 19 out of 20 most dangerous jobs, in options to live their life, in hapyness, in health, men die earlier than women for a reason.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 07:08 AM
1

1 man had kids for 17 women which had kids. Now its actually better from that perspective 2/5 men have kids and 4/5 women. We are easily going towards the original numbers.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 07:49 PM
1

Nothing significant will happen., obviously depending on were you live. Check here, in the international database The number of aware men is very small and very strong guvernmental org are working hard to keep it this way. Law currently does not allow for any men only group to be formed. I'm surprised this one is still tolerated. Probably because it is still small. Other men groups were alteady closed. Meanwhile the women group will reach 20 mil members in a very short time. Go and read titles a…
/r/MensRights18/12/23 07:30 PM
0

You could increase salaries so much that women are attracted also :d
/r/MensRights20/11/23 02:25 PM
2

He is not speaking about sickness, probably about the thing guys on r/deadbedrooms complain about.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 11:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter