TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

geraldbaron88 Archive

View 3 posts and 79 comments by geraldbaron88 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm sure you too believe this is a bond?
/r/RedPillWomen03/07/18 07:44 AM
1

They're going to side with the female imperative because, like all men, they are conditioned to do so. He hasn't resulted to the red pill due to lack of female intimacy he receives from his female idols. He's WKing because he's led to believe, by these idols, it's the best mating strategy in acquiring intimacy. It take a masculine man or a traumatic experience to succumb to TRP ideology then, only then, will he understand the female imperative.
/r/MarriedRedPill20/04/16 04:39 PM
1

How do you enhance your hypergamy towards your SO/husbands? Hypergamy can not be enhanced; it can be suppressed. Whether your SO/husband fulfils both or one aspect of the female hypergamy, there's always going to be a better version of your husband. When the option presents itself, your innate nature is going to be the primary factor in your relationship.
/r/RedPillWives20/04/16 12:57 PM
1

I used "sense" as a substitute for "understanding" What does that have to do with the question?
/r/RedPillWives20/04/16 12:44 PM
1

You believe you're going to possess an unwavering devotion to your SO in the future? Your goal, accordig to PhantomDream09, is: Women decide what is of value and worthwhile, so this sub and its focus on fulfilling LTRs/marriage is perfectly in line with Briffault's law Further, This is why we tell women to work with biology How are you expected to hold on to a LTR if you're subjected to rely on your biology (hypergamy)?
/r/RedPillWives20/04/16 12:25 PM
1

What fuzzyface1980 is trying to say- or ask, is: How do you know the support you currently have for your husband/SO isn't temporary? Either Briffault's law is wrong or the red pill wives have a false sense of devotion.
/r/RedPillWives20/04/16 11:19 AM
1

I beieve what fuzzyface1980 is trying to say- or ask, is: How do you know the support you currently have for your husband/SO isn't temporary? Either Briffault's law is wrong or the red pill wives have a false sense of devotion.
/r/RedPillWives20/04/16 11:18 AM
1

What fuzzyface1980 is trying to say, or ask, is: How do you know the support you currently have for your husband/SO isn't temporary? Either Briffault's law is wrong or the red pill wives have a false sense of devotion.
/r/RedPillWives20/04/16 11:16 AM
1

I would refrain from sexual activities, if I were you. Your dread portrays your lack of affection for her, which isn't as effective as a sense of competition. She'll refrain from nagging and advance towards winning you back. This will be successful, sine you're more likely to hide a fake infidelity. Get her back in you frame.
/r/askMRP20/04/16 10:59 AM
2

Good for you, OP. What 3 steps, out of the top of your head, do you think will enable you to become vulnerable to your SO?
/r/RedPillWives20/04/16 09:16 AM
2

I guess I have made some progress. This is the first time I have asked for help Yes, it is. OP is right. Reaching out to any form of social convention depicts vulnerability; and it requires a lot more than you think.
/r/RedPillWives20/04/16 09:14 AM
2

How is that a detriment to your relationship now? My whole life, so at least 30 years. I sucked my thumb for comfort until I was 6 years old. I'm assuming you were closed when you got together with your SO? I NEED to become more vulnerable so an even deeper connection can exist. This entails you have a deep connection and you want to explore more spheres in your romantic relationship. Do you seek a "deeper" connection or is your relationship on the decline? which is it?
/r/RedPillWives20/04/16 09:09 AM
2

Or it can lead to a loss (relationship, friends, work, etc).
/r/RedPillWives20/04/16 08:58 AM
1

At 30, men have leverage towards young females as well. A hot 30-something with a career/job or someone who seems to have had experience in the world has a better shot than a guy in college. Dad bods aren't a thing for men until they are in their 40s. Men in their 30s do bald but, they know how to take care of it (shave it all off). Unlike women, the female's attraction isn't greatly based on physical appearance. There other qualities to factor in. You agree with the post- a compromise, that wom…
/r/RedPillWives20/04/16 08:55 AM
2

I'm a controlling perfectionist who is very fearful. I am fearful that if I let my wall down I will appear weak. OP stresses the fact that she is afraid of displaying weakness, to which vulnerability entails. She's been closed her entire life; administering unaccustomed practices may compromise her relationships with her SO and her friends. What I carefully advised was a safe approach.
/r/RedPillWives20/04/16 08:42 AM
2

Then, I'll suggest: you don't open up. Don't do anything that makes you feel uncomfortable. When you force it, i'll be awkward and you'd wish you hadn't said anything. The man likes you for who you are since he's already with you, it says a lot.
/r/RedPillWives19/04/16 08:52 PM
2

We're not a social or collective movement, changing the way dating works isn't on the agenda. All we do is try to help LTR/marriage minded women find/keep good men and create fulfilling relationships. How are you helping women keep good men when there's no focus on the mate selection. Don't you think establishing a healthy romantic foundation would better serve women in the long run? Yes, some women mis-match, or chase a guy that leaves them damaged. The same thing happens to men. This is why we…
/r/RedPillWives19/04/16 08:42 PM
2

How don't you know how to be vulnerable when you're able to reveal details of your life online?
/r/RedPillWives19/04/16 07:07 PM
1

I believe they use red pill ideology as an instrument to justify their lack of social market value. After all, it's easier to see fault in others than in ourselves. An obese man, sitting behind a screen all day, would rather blame women for his inadequacies than admit he's fat (a girl should love me for me). Losers will always seek justification for their flaws.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 01:50 AM
1

The fault is not the ideology but the individual's decision towards the principles. I'm aware there is a lot of hate in the manosphere against women. I was a skeptic, in the beginning, towards the red pill until I found an appropriate forum (the rational male) without hate or vendettas against women. I view the red pill ideology from an anthropological standpoint, where the female imperative is derived from the female need for survival. It does not entail their actions are any less upsetting and…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 09:49 PM
1

We need more people like you, i_have_a_semicolon. I learned something important, today. God-- Thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 05:52 PM
–

You care about issues because they benefit you, not because you can discuss them with your buddies. Are you telling me you need to find common ground in order to believe in a cause?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 10:14 AM
–

Why don't you seek validity on your own? Do your own research; observe your community and come up with your own conclusions. Wouldn't that be more reassuring?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 07:41 PM
-1

The red pill is a euphemism; it entails being aware. These concepts were derived from the movie 'The Matrix'. In every community, there are: dumb, violent, crazy, etc people and the red pill is not a representation of these; people are. The negativity brought forth by negative red pill extremists is not red pill. Like religion, the red pill is here to teach. What people do with the philosophy should not reflect on the ideology but the people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 07:32 PM
1

You read my mind, Shitjoker.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 11:57 AM
1

That's very well put, PIBangent. Once people stop hatin' and, instead, observe how these conditioning play out in reality then maybe- just maybe, they can take control of their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 11:54 AM
–

your arguments are very structurally sounds. Please, tell me more?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:50 PM
1

Please, teach me?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:49 PM
–

They can all be summed up to egalitarianism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:39 PM
–

Being a Red Pill'er or Blue Pill'er doesn't mean you should take the ideology word-for word. The manosphere/femosphere is like a religion. Do not take everything to heart without doing your own research. That said, here are my interpretations of the following in RP perspective: Man-up entails masculinity (Confidence, Complete, Ambitious, A Leader, Fun, etc.) Expressing vulnerability is not defined as being a man (Do not express them to the outside world). As a man you'll either fall on side of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 02:15 PM
–

With your presumptions, I see why I had to ask the question four times. You're incapable of reason-- let alone, drafting one, by the looks of it. Time will not sere you; you need GOD.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 01:07 PM
–

Send me a link to your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 12:57 PM
–

Did you read the rest or do you prefer arguing with what you can get?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 12:42 PM
–

So, you're here because of the votes? Just to be clear-- Purple Pill Debate is not for debating, but a sub to gain votes?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 12:28 PM
–

Help me see the value. Please, guide me towards the light.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 12:25 PM
-1

BP has principles; you're just not aware of them. Man-up? Express vulnerability? Sex (You can have it all- AF/BB)? Does it ring a bell?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 12:24 PM
–

People don't shift because they lack knowledge. People shift when they panic. When they're stuck, they presume they're in the wrong. Being a "purple pill" doesn't help the cause when you share RP & BP ideologies. I'd rather have you red or blue-- not lukewarm. At least then ideologies will have a robust supportive means.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 12:17 PM
–

It's a sub, you can have debates. You can raise an argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 12:07 PM
0

You're right. People are here without a good reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 12:05 PM
–

What does that have to do with this sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 12:04 PM
–

http://pastebin.com/A9ahGyip Lengthy-- this article is not very well thought. It lacks structure and sources. The inception and growth of the manosphere is due to the flaws and unrealistic expectations of the female imperative. How are men to man-up and expected to be vulnerable at the same time? Would feminism be effective were it addressed from a non-feminist stand point? How is the red pill androcentric when it's derived from observations of the female imperative?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 11:52 AM
–

People are going to deceive you regardless of their race, gender, or religious background. It's upon you, to take preventative measures to avoid duplicitous conducts. You're responsible for your well-being. Either be aware and stay in the game or be the game; the choice is solely on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:47 AM
–

Care to flatter me?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:40 AM
–

It's a euphemism. So is "blue pill" and "red pill". Your reproach towards the manosphere is not very well thought of since you're posting on a purple pill sub. How big are your insecurities? Cuckery- what's that?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:40 AM
–

I understand. You want to express your ideas without the fear of being banned or having your comments deleted- I understand. Though wouldn't it be more effective if you addressed the parties directly? For instance, I'm red pill. When I have a question where I need red pill knowledge and support, I'd post it on the red pill sub. When I have an argument to make, I'd post a thought provoking question, like this one, on the blue pill sub and corner them with more questions. If they come up with bett…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:16 PM
–

I understand. You want to express your ideas without the fear of being banned or having your comments deleted- I understand. Though wouldn't it be more effective if you addressed the parties directly? For instance, I'm red pill. When I have a question where I need red pill knowledge and support, I'd post it on the red pill sub. When I have an argument to make, I'd post a thought provoking question, like this one, on the blue pill sub and corner them with more questions. If they come up with bett…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:13 PM
–

I've debated a couple of red pill principles in the blue pill sub and they were taken into consideration. However, if you're rude and express obscenities, then they will delete your comments or ban you. Though, if you are comment is deleted because of well structured argument, shouldn't it be a victorious gesture?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 09:41 PM
1

A debate requires an official standing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 09:34 PM
–

They can as well do it within the red pill or blue pill sub. This sub is useless. Why debate here?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 09:31 PM
–

Now you can go back? This sub is no longer a substitute.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 09:28 PM
–

Alright. Now, you can go back? This sub is deemed obsolete now that you're able to go back.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 09:27 PM
1

How does that make it any different if the same participants have the discussion here? The red pill and blue pill subs will always have an agenda regardless where the debate takes place.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 09:23 PM
–

That would make this sub obsolete then. Since these these discussions can be made within the red pill or bull pill subs, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 09:18 PM
–

They can do that in the red pill sub or the blue pill sub. Can't they?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 09:11 PM
–

Neutrality defeats the purpose of a debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 09:08 PM
0

Yes, courtrooms are institutions where parties dispute within their buffers of the appropriate laws. Otherwise, everyone would be a lawyer. There are red pill principle and there are blue pill principles; why aren't there purple pill principles? It would make this sub obsolete, don't you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 09:01 PM
–

Of course, there are no original ideas in this existence, though I can argue that TRP has, officially/publicly, illuminated a bright light towards the female imperative. The red pill and blue pill appraisers are subject to their own conditioning. However, that doesn't explain why there's a purple sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 08:54 PM
1

Courtrooms are where people exercise their family law, contract law, property law, etc disputes. So yes, there need be purple pill principles.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 08:35 PM
–

A set of beliefs do make a premise for a debate. Otherwise, there won't be any debates.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 08:31 PM
2

Can't you find people who agree and/or disagree within the red pill or blue pill subs?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 08:28 PM
1

The titles or the debates?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 08:27 PM
–

How does that apply to the purple pill subreddit? There's a possibility of waving alpha dicks at the blue pill and red pill subs, or any other subreddits. Why create a new one?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 08:26 PM
-2

I agree! The red pill blue pill subreddits do possess extreme ideological perceptions towards the other. However, the purple pill ideology is skewed towards the red pill; why not make a full transition towards the red pill community?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 08:18 PM
1

These ideas meaning the purple pill ideas? I believe these Ideas are skewed towards a red pill mentality with a touch of the former blue pill conditioning. Could that be the reason you get b7?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 08:03 PM
1

What does that have to do with the Purple Pill subreddit? It doesn't explain why it exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 07:57 PM
–

Please, elaborate? What sets you apart?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 07:55 PM
–

I was never plugged in either but, most of the ideas that are discussed in the manosphere (The Rational Male) do relate to my psychological build-up. My brothers and I were raised with alpha ideologies, however, I've never made an analysis pertaining to the male-female social dynamic until now. On the contrary, guys here, myself included, claiming to have always possessed the red-pill(ish) philosophy could be in denial or their beta tendencies. How are we to know when we, as individuals, have a …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 07:52 PM
0

I repeat: Stand you Fucking ground! If you're not going to stand your ground and demonstrate some alpha characteristics, these bitches will walk all over you. Stand your ground. It helps if you bear a reputable independence. How do you gain this reputation? Well, by standing for your principles. I wrote a post, on facebook, about the female hypergamy and I didn't get shit from anyone. I got approval instead. In addition, I fuck up all the time, people brush it off and are ok with it. demonstrate…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 07:12 PM
1

Man, this is similar with a friend of mine in college. He looks like Keanu Reeves but, he has a hard time closing with girls from my university. He's really nice, with everyone, which is the problem. He dries these girl's vags up. Your personality has to match your looks. If your ugly, don't try the asshole game, girls will hate you with a distasteful passion. If you're moderate or good looking, just be confident. Practice your game. Don't wait to perfect it. Use trial and error- it works!
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 11:33 AM
1

Clearly, this girl was seeking a sexual encounter(s) as opposed to a romantic relationship, whether it be a boyfriend or a random guy; one does not seek a romantic relationship within a one-night stand. There are no emotions nor obligations; everyone gets their own and leaves. This girl is either a liar or a moron. Her justifications are deemed void for her intention, to find comfort in a one-night stand, is moronic.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 11:16 AM
0

Stand your ground!! I believe the best way to confront while maintaining order is by asking questions. The good thing you did was post an article from a recognised international news stations. Therefore, whatever unsourced bullshit they come up with can't and should not hold up to as highly reputable a news station as CNN. Ask them questions and corner them into an "Ill-learned box of stupidly ignorant fannies". You don't need to make them feel stupid, it's best they do that on their own. Ask th…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 10:55 AM
3

Firstly, this is another demonstration of the female imperative-- solipsism. She has put your guy in a misfortunate circumstance because she fear losing him? If that is not a red flag to eject, then your buddy is as beta as can be. Help your beta friend see his flaw. If she hadn't know, which she did, herpes was an unfortunate disease she wouldn't hide. Her hiding it from her boyfriend and knowingly exposing him to the illness definitely shows how much she cares for him and his well being. In ad…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 10:30 AM
2

Yes, i read your post. I agree with it. I just wanted to add that your grandma and mother don't tell you to "be yourself" because the have to but, because it actually works. Though the the notion is misconstrued when taken literally. Yes, being yourself works, but what they meant was to be the best version of yourself. As opposed to the PUA you read about who teach men routines that don't really suit these student and they windup failing. Buy yeah, you grandma and mom are right.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 10:51 PM
0

Sex is a sex-satisfying act and a self-validating act, regardless on your failed ability acknowledge the notion. Wanting to be with and accepted by the other is validating. I am sure, if you were about to have sex with someone and in the midst of the passionate kisses and the ruffling of sheets, he decides that he no longer wants to have sex with you. Setting aside the awkward tension between the two of you, you might ask: Why? "Why doesn't he want to have sex me?" It takes a toll on your self-e…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 10:41 PM
1

You better drop them chicken wings and hit the treadmill. As a matter of fact, drop the salad as well. You've had your share of food. You can't be fucking these girls when you can't see your dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 10:15 PM
5

I don't believe women lie when they advice us to look sharp, or acquire a good sense of hygiene, or even to become fit. Last I checked, these were the qualities essential for establishing a solid social and economic life. Believe it or not but, granny has shared a solid advice. Yes, be yourself but, not your loser self, your better self. Your better self will draw in success in all sectors (school, women, workplace, etc.) You become a better version of yourself with self-improvement tactics. But…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 10:04 PM
0

I believe, according to the rationale male, that due to the female hypergamy, women are consciously unaware of what they prefer in an emotional of physical aspect. Though, I've had women intentionally give me bad advice in regards to dating other women while covertly manipulating my emotions in order to better serve them. I still believe advice procured from one party is to be held accountable to both parties, regardless of the quality of information given. Ask for the advice, however, conduct a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 09:47 PM
1

That's not push-pull. You were desperate. You left the venue and came back (pathetic). You were told off and ran like a coward. You couldn't find any prospect and you came back desperate. They smelled your desperation from the time you left the other venue to return back to where you once ran. Now you are seeking validation, from online redittors, to nurse your wounds. There's nothing to be ashamed of. You messed up and came up short-- it's natural.
/r/seduction07/04/16 08:36 PM
1

I think you lacked the "confidence" you so claim you had. The fact that the height difference made you feel insecure lowered your SMV. Girls sense when you are both confident and insecure and you, my friend, were insecure and desperate. This girls weren't digging your vibe. This is what l would have done: 1) Upon meeting these girls and handing out favours (taking them to the club), I would have immediately socialised with other people but, occasionally keeping them in the loop. You want them to…
/r/seduction07/04/16 08:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter