TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gerardchiasson3 Archive

View 1 post and 27 comments by gerardchiasson3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
210

gerardchiasson3/r/MGTOW23/09/17 02:46 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Do you read books (novels, literature, not technical stuff or self help). That could help develop some creativity in conversation
/r/seduction13/04/22 12:45 AM
2

Well the whole idea is that contraceptives fail and/or you can regret your in the moment choice, hence the need for abortion and release of responsibility for men. Women suffer damages from those circumstances, so it seems unfair that the man can walk away scott free.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 07:01 PM
4

Issue with that is that abortion can be a risky procedure, so the woman may decide to keep the child, and then when going through pregnancy which itself is a toll on your body, would choose to keep the child instead of giving it away if she wants kids some day even if it's not the perfect time. So it seems a bit unfair that the man can inflict this damage then walk away scott free. Basically you're potentially fucking the woman's body up (either with abortion or pregnancy) by getting her pregnan…
/r/MensRights26/09/20 08:59 PM
8

I think it's ok that men can't choose if a woman will abort or not, since either is a big toll on her body. He should have the option of being liberated from his responsibilities, though. "If you can kill that motherfucker, I can at least abandon him".
/r/MensRights26/09/20 08:52 PM
16

Exactly! It needs to be optional so that you can be respected for it.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 08:50 PM
1

We're accumulating evidence. Eventual victory is certain.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 01:33 AM
18

Yep, that's the real problem. People "believe all women" so women abuse it. Simple
/r/MensRights25/05/20 04:28 AM
14

Ruined how? Is there a criminal record of that, or just social repercussions
/r/MensRights07/05/20 04:44 PM
14

Yeah but once one side acts offended and uses lawsuits shit gets real, so you have to fight back to get your point across
/r/MensRights22/04/20 02:45 PM
8

Their logic is it's been men first for decades, now it's ladies turn. Not necessarily true but it can be logically consistent
/r/MensRights18/04/20 09:56 PM
3

Uh no, it's half the earnings minus expenses. If Adele spent most of it herself he is half responsible for those expenses too
/r/MensRights07/04/20 06:43 PM
-1

Funny how everyone on Reddit outperforms all of their peers
/r/MensRights07/02/20 04:53 PM
5

They can if the code that sends the text messages is audited
/r/MensRights07/02/20 04:50 PM
1

Nice theory but a lot of people hook up on first dates and I doubt they think about establishing a narrative. Why does it happen for some people but consistently not for OP?
/r/seduction27/04/19 08:52 PM
2

Ok looks like we agree after all. Obviously "believe all victims" is wrong, but "require 100% proof" is wrong too. Let's not focus on any side in isolation but remember the trade off between FP and FN.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:39 AM
0

You realize that the fact that no proof is 100% certain implies that innocent people will be convicted, right? This is true even if we make the sacrifice of releasing guilty people. Again, you're thinking in the binary paradigm (evidence vs no evidence), whereas in reality there are degrees of evidence. The whole point is getting to agree to a threshold, which is hard to do without numbers. Just shouting out "HIGHER" or "LOWER" is useless.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 02:40 AM
-2

You need to adopt a Bayesian perspective. No proof is 100% certain; some evidence just tilts the probability. The binary perspective is too simplistic and naive. The fact I was downvoted discredits this sub. We need nuanced opinions to be credible in an argument.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 12:14 AM
-4

Exactly. This sub sometimes blindly calls for less false negatives, ignoring false positives completely. Without hard numbers, it's hard to support any proposed correction.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 08:26 PM
1

Ah I see
/r/MensRights29/11/18 06:18 PM
0

It's a private business open to the public, though Just like the organization is private but open to the public.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:17 PM
2

Doing this with humanities is dangerous too, the proof is they then make stupid policies like this one
/r/MensRights27/11/18 05:32 AM
11

What does that statistic show? Sounds extremely convoluted.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 03:05 PM
7

I'm not surprised, call centers are the bottom of the lower class. With high salaries, diplomas and wealth, everyone becomes more entitled and nitpicky about being uncomfortable. Poor women have other problems than undesired men hitting up on them.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 04:52 PM
5

Depends on the job. Wouldn't work in an office environment.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 04:14 PM
3

Yes of course it would be wrong to say "Girls suck at math" as in the original xkcd. My main point is that people don't really say that to their face. Much more often they are objective and say "You suck at math" but then women/minorities get defensive and think we are attacking their race/gender, whereas we're really just attacking the low skills of that particular person.
/r/MGTOW23/09/17 07:13 PM
7

Simple, being yourself is necessary but not sufficient. Of course you need to be the best possible. But you can't be too calculating / stressed about. You retards are making this way too complicated
/r/TheRedPill04/11/16 06:22 AM
2

probably more for you than for him!
/r/seduction05/04/12 07:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter