TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

germophobe123 Archive

View 5 posts and 191 comments by germophobe123 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

r/whoosh r/boneappletea I agree with most your points but geez did you miss a few things there hahaha Who is this gecko and where is he from? Lmaoo
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 01:56 AM
-3

Yes exactly, was gonna say this. Not many women are likeable, hard to find interesting women that are good ppl and also attractive (just like many men aren’t likeable )
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 01:53 AM
6

Yeah. Always outliers, but there definitely patterns that ppl don’t want to admit
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 12:14 PM
12

They’re Not candid, yet its so obvious and common, you’d think they would just admit it! Then again to be fair, if for thousands of years telling the truth would result in me being clubbed over the head, id probably learn to be duplicitous too. Seriously. I understand it, but goddammit is it ever annoying. And high time to stop it since we aren’t in caves anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 11:29 AM
–

You got it. Summed it up perfectly, lets see OPS response (if any)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 11:09 AM
1

Yep. Should be taught way more
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 08:57 PM
2

Great advice.. that also applies to literally everything in life. Unfortunately ppl are addicted to easy black/white thinking
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/21 06:49 PM
1

No but I understand the confusion. It’s not gross in the moment, but its just not wife material.. big difference. Its like men have a dual strategy, there’s easy sex that can be quick and dirty but we don’t want to invest long term but can still be hot and sexy.. and then theres the classy woman who we think its worth going with long term and giving resources to, and we don’t want her to be slutty and easy (unless its with us behind closed doors) So both are sexy but in different ways. If we thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 04:22 PM
2

I see what you’re saying, but I think thats just because men have been conditioned to realize most women don’t operate like that, so our alarm bells go off like “this is too good to be true, she’s either damaged or trying to steal my kidney”.. again not because we don’t like it, but more because we know most women aren’t about that, so its just out of the norm more than actually unsexy
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 12:45 PM
15

Thats a lot of words to say “yes, women need Plausible Deniability “ for most men “wanna fuck?” sounds perfectly sexy.. it’s women that find that “unsexy”.. why? Because they need plausible deniability
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 08:08 AM
4

Why wtf happened? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 03:50 PM
12

Mugabe? As in Evil dictator president Mugabe?
/r/MGTOW224/10/20 08:24 PM
3

Not ready to read the whole thing yet.. but just wanted to say I really liked the preface “chonk of a thread incoming” for some reason lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 08:23 PM
2

I read your first paragraph and thought ‘yeah ok, let me give her a chance then and really try to understand and listen to what she’s saying’ ... then you immediately started calling your opinions facts and refuting well established scientific correlations with nothing but ‘its sexists trash’ .. so yeah, maybe ppl don’t respect your ’opinions’ as valid bc you present them as trash and call the opposite of your opinions ‘sexist trash’ willy nilly Or no, its gotta be because SeXiSm right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 03:59 AM
16

Good point
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 01:00 AM
5

Definitely.. but its really the only sensible and good option
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 04:08 PM
2

Yes exactly. This guy gets it^
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 04:08 PM
3

What, observe what a person who has good looks looks like? Man im sorry but that was not needed AT ALL.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/20 06:02 AM
5

1- you’re exaggerating looks , Maybe to compensate for how much society exaggerates and claims they are meaningless .. so in the end, like usual, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Looks and personality are both huge factors. 2- why then fu*k did i just watch that stupid video, what was that for? Jesus christ most useless shit ive ever seen
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/20 05:57 AM
2

Yeah, just very carefully. Maybe never tho, rather be single than simp (tho if she’s willing to actually contribute equally then why not be nice and help eachother)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/20 04:27 AM
1

Yeah thats true. And actually kinda my answer to OPs question.. I don’t hate women, but if I have any negative feelings towards them as a group at all, its the hypocrisy. I hate hypocrisy, the proof is Ill take an honest woman as a friend over a hypocritical man any day of the week. It just so happens society today allows more hypocrisy with women
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 01:03 AM
1

Exactly.. But maybe men are actually doing it more? Idk So yeah, its fucked up on both ends.. how ab we all just stop ffs
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 12:36 AM
2

Fair enough re:the impact and not being able to turn it off. That sucks.. but So you’re gonna blame all stoves and be afraid of all of them bc some malfunction? Its one thing having a reaction, its another then trying to logically justify your reaction after the fact as more than just an instinct but as being logically correct. Its like being afraid of all dogs (in the west) its pretty irrational bc most are well behaved.. so even if you were bit once as a kid or something, most are not like tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:43 PM
3

This is a great question btw
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:23 PM
29

But majority of Men don’t do this.. if you hate an entire gender shouldn’t it be for something the majority of them do? And also mannnny women joke ab assaulting and mutilating men, maybe even more so! Or at least more publicly and acceptably (like jokes about cutting dicks off etc.. Ive heard that more in real life than men talking ab doing similar to women)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:22 PM
1

Im not subbed to a single one of those.. this is the only one for me. Its more than enough. (I just browse some other ones when Im really in the mood to think about/research these topics)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 01:58 PM
2

They try and cite legitimate reasons such as it being their desire to make sure their offspring is theirs, even though those kind of scenarios are unbelievably rare. Thats very debatable. It depends on socioeconomic and other factors.. it varies from 1-2% all the way up to 35% depending, again, on area and culture etc..
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 11:57 PM
2

;)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 03:25 PM
3

Yeah Men def do the same.. id say the halo effect is pretty equal among the sexes
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 11:49 PM
1

If you’re a man probably, but if you’re a woman you physically can’t (on average) be abusive physically as successfully.. so you might amp up the emotional side as its your only viable weapon. So I see your point, but gonna have to say they create equal abuse overall.. and if they don’t, its only bc they can’t (kinda like saying white ppl are more evil by nature when really its just that the most recent ‘successful’ imperialists who had the means to enslave happened to be white.. you know, cause…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/20 05:44 PM
2

Depends how realistic they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/20 05:32 PM
1

True, but both do both
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/20 02:04 PM
1

Thats true, but women do both too. Just men do one more and women do the other more, and both and both suck
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/20 02:03 PM
1

I think we’re talking about different things. Im saying that men ( as a group ) hurt women (as a group) and women ( as a group) hurt men, equally, but in different ways. One is a big nasty bite and the other is tiny little bites. You’re then saying the little bites are easier to heal from and you used a personal analogy of an individual getting hurt by the little thinggd and how they can recover more easily. Im saying yes, in the technical sense maybe thsts true, but in the sense im meaning it, …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/20 01:01 AM
2

You seem pretty nice so don’t* take this reply the wrong way.. But 1- its not an assumption, theres alot of studies on it. But even if it was an assumption, ‘projection’ wouldn’t be the right word/concept. Maybe you could say it was anecdotal or an unfounded assumption, but not projection. Tho yeah, its none of those anyway. And then on your other comment yes women may be equally violent (at least theres some evidence to show thats true in domestic relationships) but men are obviously and factua…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/20 12:50 AM
1

Read my comment above. Im not talking ab ‘making mean comments’, and I said they weren’t actually comparable. Im talking about the lies and deceit and gossip and getting others to be violent for them , u know, the shit that women have done since the dawn of time? But of course ‘women are better than men’ effect is so strong noones gonna admit that and its hard to quantify. But tell me, why don’t women like other women? Cause they know the trouble (most cause) Anyway, again, theyre both fuckin te…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/20 12:42 AM
3

See this was exactly my point. Was waiting for this exact comment and anticipated it my comment (if you actually read it) Its not just ‘being mean to men’ its sucking their souls and will to live,.. or at least, live civilly. But a) yes you cannot compare it, and as i said i think sentences are too light on the ones that commit these crimes. & b) Its also up to men to not take shit so personally and not give womens behaviour such importance to them individually. Collectively tho, its a bit trick…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 07:40 PM
1

Right but im not just talking personally (in which case i agree with you) but im talking on a group level (even tho the group is made up of persons of course)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 07:35 PM
1

Maybe my analogy wasn’t the best, bc your conclusion makes sense taking the analogy literally.. but in the sense I actually meant it (the harm women do to society and against men vs the harm men do to society and against women) I disagree one is worse than the other
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 04:28 PM
2

For sure, life is not fair, and thinking it should be all the time is entitlement and poisonous... but we can paradoxically avoid that entitled thinking while we simultaneously try to even the playing field (to an extent. Force the evening too much and you turn into USSR, tho too little and its anarchy and libertarianism at its most extreme and every-person-for-themself.. so some balance inbetween those Two) But How is 1-Projection? Its just obviously true and demonstrably so that the male popul…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 04:25 PM
10

Right yep. And are women liking it? Societally, maybe. Sexually and Romantically? Not at all, they hate it. But thats not really womens fault (or mens) can’t blame people for having a complicated nature and attraction. You can, however, get upset at ppl for not owning up to it , or being hypocrites. As well as for over simplifying and playing the blame game.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 01:03 PM
57

For those arguing that misogyny causes direct violence more than misandry does (assuming its true for sake of argument) lets see why tho and discuss a few points. (Btw I don’t condone any violence against anyone and think rapists and the like should have wayyy harsher sentences, but anyway) 1-Men are more varied in their extremes. So you have more low IQ men and more high IQ men, where as women fall in the middle more on average. This applies not just to intelligence but many things. Its reasona…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 10:47 AM
2

Lolzzz
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 05:04 AM
3

Hate to admit it but im addicted to this show (assuming its real) its actually pretty informative. The editing and forced situations ruin it tho, but theres some real gems. And yeah, Ed looked much better when he was married and cheated etc.. still was 4”11 tho and pre-internet
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 04:36 PM
1

Man you’re having half the conversation in your head and then answering to that.. i have no fuckin clue what you’re on about
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 02:26 AM
1

What? How the fck did I say that? Thats not what u said and therefor not what I was replying to
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 03:46 AM
2

Just sayin Compared to the average american woman, better in most countries. But you if you want a woman thats perfect in all those areas you gonna have to win the jackpot or upgrade your cumsock to a RobotWife
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 03:54 PM
1

AND WHAT OF THEIR TEETH, I Say?!? Lolz
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 03:52 PM
1

Yeah, to be fair tho its not as easy as you think when you’ve been brainwashed to not appreciate it. Then it just becomes this weird mentally and emotionally hard but physically easy mode (there is a solution but most ppl won’t do it, basically using meditation and other methods to emancipate yourself from the false slavery)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:50 AM
7

Europes a big place, can find some decent women in a few corners of the continent.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:46 AM
2

Manny? Is that you?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:36 AM
2

Lol thanks. I mean , we gotta try right.. the temptation is often there to go too extreme one way or the other, so I get where you’re coming from... but yeah, we gotta just keep tryin to keep the balance. Cheers
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 12:46 AM
2

Nah i think its a balance.. you def have to be willing and able to bend the rules when necessary or more, when the system is unreasonable.. but thats a far cry from only looking out for yourself and never helping the tribe. Its a a paradoxical balance of helping others and yourself. And yes ruthless people succeed, but for how long, and do they make a better and more stable and therefor fruitful world for their offspring? Thats the true measure of success biologically and most ruthless ppl do th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 12:36 AM
1

I mean I like the general point of ‘the world owes you nothing’ ... infact its some of the best advice I ever got as an angsty teenager years ago... but if you agree to date someone theres some expectations of conduct (that perhaps should be articulated better by everyone involved) And when u say the winners there are the ones who best give the impression of following the rules while successfully overcoming them. Do you mean ‘give the impression of following while successfully breaking/bending t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 11:36 PM
1

It is legally mandated. -Stealing is a crime. -Stock market manipulation and insider trading is a crime -Discrimination is fined and a sue-able matter etc.. But yes alot of the fairness we live by is unwritten and unenforceable bc its hard to prove and relative, but theres still the punishment of a bad reputation bc ppl eventually start to talk to other about you not being fair and try to convince ppl to not work with you. If you have any experience in business (small or large) or in a tight-nit…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 09:18 PM
0

Alrite if thats a non-ironic response and you’re not trolling but seriously just linked that, then you’re beyond help at this moment (Also he’s not even that skinny, he had clear muscular definition in multiple areas, even if smaller)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 09:02 PM
1

Didn’t gloss over it I just assumed from the way you wrote it that that factor would remain the same and only the fat vs skinny vs muscular is what changed
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 08:52 PM
1

Fat rock stars slay too haha. You’re logic is so flawed You could say maybe women prefer skinny men to fat men,.. but saying they prefer skinny men to muscular strong men is actually insane. Have you met a human female? Or maybe you actually believe some of them when they casually say ‘i don’t care about big muscles, derrrp’ Let me translate for you, it could mean ‘I don’t want to seem shallow so im gonna sell my virtue to you’ (cause thats not common /s) Or geniunely but more detailed ‘I don’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 08:51 PM
2

No, most redpill MEN are cringe, but a large amount ( if I had to put a number on it maybe 60-70%) of the concepts are spot on What colour pill would purple (50/50) + 20% more red be? Also your comment about women not caring about muscular men but only that they be skinny and not fat? That kind of delusion Makes your opinion on women mean very little tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 08:42 PM
1

This is really dumb, are you joking? Women obviously like muscular men more than skinny men (with the ideal being muscular but not too muscular, and lean)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 08:38 PM
1

Basically you’re trying to apply something universally that shouldn’t be... it is ok when a few bad apples do it, but if everyone did it would result in anarchy. And again, it just isn’t right (you gotta put your foot down and draw a line morally at some point, even if technically everything is relative) Everyone thinks they’re special so when they bend fairness to their advantage theres alot of mental gymnastics that happen in their head to try to justify it .. so they don’t feel like a POS bad…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 06:55 PM
1

Okay but everyone agrees that fairness is necessary, even by forced imposition, some just believe it shouldn’t apply to them.. but everyone other than anarchists think its a good things others should be fair. But again, individuals think they’re above the rules and try to selfishly get away with it, which, if enough ppl do all at once, will destabilize alot of good will and general unspoken agreements in society. So yeah, no, we do owe eachother fairness (to an extent) otherwise we should live a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 06:49 PM
1

Nope, not when (like hitler and others) legally get their way into office and then change the laws (not that thats exactly what happened, but essentially) But yeah sorry your logic is that of a sociopath with no empathy or care for others or the tribe but just for oneself. Its still somewhat logical and i see where you’re coming from, but again its the sociopathic/psychopathic part in every human (some more, some less of course) that is thinking that way, and its wrong morally as well as practic…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 06:14 PM
2

Basically you’re saying ‘whatever you can get away with, go ahead and get away with it as long as you can/ppl are buying it’ Thats called anarchy. Even animals have some rules. By that logic if you can get away with mass murder (like a dictator) but everyone agrees with you at the moment, then its no problem. In other words, ‘we live in a society’
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 04:53 PM
20

Ive lived in Western Europe and North America, you’re right, there’s definitely a bigger emphasis on online dating in N.A. Or rather a stronger propensity to not socialize as much or as often or in the same way as europeans
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/20 03:26 PM
5

Was thinking the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/20 03:19 PM
1

Correction: its all about validation for some men, who are ego maniacs (which is alot of men and women, unfortunately) Of course everyone has a bit of ego and validation mixed with dating or sex, but read the comment i just replied to his.. he is an extreme example of using sex as almost strictly a way to boost his ego
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/20 03:16 PM
3

I can have sex with a girl once or twice then I’m ready for something new. I have no desire to sleep with them again after that point. Thats fucked up, that means you probably have a huge ego and use sex primarily for validation After a guy has sex with any woman, his sex drive will plummet. It’s psychological. He’ll never want you like he wanted you the very first time. Altho thats true ,again I think in your case (or anyone who’s doing it strictly for validation and ego boost) then this effect…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/20 03:12 PM
1

Pls explain
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 08:45 PM
0

1- im 5”6 and 30lbs (minimum) overweight at any given time and had pretty great success (relying on vibe and personality and some assertiveness) Im not a chad but ive had multiple gfs technically ‘way out of my league’ as well as ONS when I actually put in the effort 2- obviously can’t trust all Studies, but this study says height is a big factor but strength is much more. I think theres a few other studies that say the same “Physical Strength Determines Over 70% of Men’s Bodily Attractiveness” …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 05:03 AM
2

Not sure how perfect the study is but it seems pretty Legit “Physical Strength Determines Over 70% of Men’s Bodily Attractiveness” https://lanegoodwin.com/study-confirms-muscular-7-times-attractive-tall-good-news-short-men/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 04:59 AM
2

whoooosh
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 03:28 PM
5

Yep and also just genetic/hormonal/personality make up
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 03:17 PM
6

“Thats like the 2nd time i heard that, what is that pussy on a pedestal thing?”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 03:13 PM
1

It wouldn't be surprising if this is simply lust mistaken for love. Mostly for sure, but not all. Men actually have no appreciation for a woman's personalities, hobbies , interests and achievements. Really not tryin to be sexist here, but maybe.. just maybe, is it bc more women on average are way more boring than men? Ive met a few women that do not bore me at all, friends and gfs, and i loved talking to them and took a huge interest in their personalities and interests bc they were actually int…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 04:55 AM
3

Wait you still have her back 110% after she screwed you over? Gotta draw the line somewhere no? Also, Not sure thats really MGTOW bro lol (not that I care, I don’t technically/officially subscribe fully to any of them, just sayin cause you said you were)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 04:34 AM
20

This guy gets it ^
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 04:28 AM
2

Its just inherently wrong.. Morally and factually. Its super hypocritical and unacceptable.. Because if they don’t fight fair then the other group won’t fight fair, and thats how things go nuclear We should strive for fairness as much as possible (while being some what realistic about it as well.. but not toooo realistic lol . gotta be a bit of a dreamer to make great new things happen too, its a weird balance)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:02 AM
1

Ahh yes, well said (both of you) thanks for the clarification
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:59 AM
2

Yeah except the tonnes of guilt from women and society men get constantly bombarded with for having any standards at all. i.e. if a man did indeed walk away from a girl after being in a relationship for months but then finding out she was promiscuous and didn’t make other guys wait but made him wait, all her friends would be calling him a piece of shit etc.. Youre right, alot of men do take out their loserdom on women, but thats only SOME men and part of the story.. the truth is men are guilted …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:57 AM
2

Also itll come to light eventually after a few months of a serious relationship.. a combo of talking and interacting with her friends and getting her back story etc.. unless she’s insanely dedicated to hide it long term (I dont put it past some of them, but I found it all Comes to light pretty early)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:47 AM
2

Well 1-they used the wrong word (maybe prude or something would make more sense) but 2- clearly those men are fuckin retarded. Good way to see a red flag early on I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:45 AM
2

Haha they have a point ^
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:40 AM
0

Thought the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:40 AM
1

Id say its case by case basis. Some don’t know (out of lack of insight, intelligence or exposure to the info) and some know, but don’t care. Could argue till the cows come home about what the % is , but yeah id say its a bit of both. Its like someone who’s bad a job tho.. wether theyre dumb or lazy, either way they are bad at their job. Maybe you educated them a few times and then if they still don’t get it, then drop them
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:35 AM
8

The difference is when a man does he’s ‘evil and selfish’ (according to mainstream majority) but when women do the exact same thing its ‘Duh! Of course, why would she shoot herself in the foot by not looking out for her best interest?!’
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:30 AM
2

It could also argued that there is a very dark side to empathy. It takes less empathy to figure out how to manipulate people for your benefit, than it does to understand how your own happiness isn't more valuable than theirs. Could say this a different way and/or elaborate? I don’t get it
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 03:28 AM
1

Haha horrible husband? Its called human nature, just cause you care more about your safety and the benefits he can give you doesn’t make you better than a guy caring about a womans looks.. again, it mite even be more selfish. The rest of your responses don’t even make sense.. this is dumb, you just clearly hate men. Good luck
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 08:51 PM
1

Ya but you’re thinking about it in terms of right now where they have a chance (and tbh youre probably not trying too hard to truly put yourself in their shoes and think about it from a low value male perspective) In a society and environment that allows them a semi-fair chance to move up the social latter and/or have access to a wife and family, then yes, you’re right. And social pressure from others saying ‘listen you just gotta get your shit together and youll be better’ goes a long way when …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 08:48 PM
1

Wait what? What do you mean im not following your point
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 08:32 PM
1

Omg im not gonna explain it in detail again when its been explained a million times on this sub. Wether marriage or just sex, if womens 80/20 attraction (coupled with mens desire for many women) plays out unchecked it leads to destabilizing society! Why would the bottom 80% of men not able to get laid continue to contribute with good will in a society that ignores their existence and just uses them?! And worse, accuses and vilifies them?! Im not saying its right, im saying its 1-somewhat underst…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 05:16 PM
0

Ok so you’re correcting dictionaries now? Good one. And yes good looks matter, its not useless in marriage bc it motivates the man in multiple ways and again, makes better babies. And men don’t commit to only beautiful women, they just will bang dumb beautiful women (cause sperm Is cheap) but for commitment (more expensive) men still rate intelligence and kindness super high up . And to repeat: signs of good health are not useless either, how could you possibly think that? The healthier a person…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 05:13 PM
1

Polyamory more than polygamy.. as in unmarried people sleeping around and having tonnes of casual sex. How about your pew trends on single motherhood? Marriage rates? Population rates? Come on use your head. And I just gave you a perfect explanation why men are earning less and less above
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 04:53 PM
0

Ok please explain the difference. Wesbters definition of hypergamy : marriage into an equal or higher caste or social group Sure sounds like thats what it is. And Im not saying men and womens choices are EXACTLY the same, but they sure as hell are close. But what I really want to know is how men wanting women with symmetrical features that are signs of health and good genes to be passed on is somehow shallow and bad ,but women wanting a guy who has money isn’t shallow?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 04:32 PM
1

Are you ok? So because I didn’t see one video I couldn’t possibly have an opinion? Like Studying history and seeing trends in the decline of culture in multiple civilizations and over 100s of years + being someone who has dated women pre and post online dating (becoming huge), + talking to tonnes of women and men irl and online on the subject + reading statistics on marriage means nothing, cause I didn’t see one video? Good one
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 04:28 PM
1

What Jacksonville video? Im sure one video in friggin jacksonville isn’t going to convince me that overall as a grand trend western society is obviously moving towards polyamory and polygamy.. but im open minded, lets see this damning evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 03:43 PM
0

What? No im upset at the hypocrisy. how many times do I have to say it? I said multiple times in this thread that it makes perfect sense to want to date a successful man. The problem is the deception and hypocrisy and pretending to be nice and want points for being accepting, as well as expecting men to accept physically unattractive women otherwise theyre evil pushing stereotypes, but then you still justify your hypergamy. Either embrace your hypergamy and expect others (men) to do the same, li…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 03:41 PM
1

1- I love how alot of women fluctuate so seamlessly and without a hint of self awareness between ‘oh just be nice, you gotta love the fat girl for whats on the inside!’ To the next breath saying ‘well of course she shouldn’t marry someone beneath her in finances like a fast food worker, are you Nuts!?’ When men expect a level of attractiveness theyre evil pieces of shit, but when women do its just ‘knowing her worth’ and ‘what she’s attracted to’ So no im not mad at her for not dating down, agai…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 02:42 PM
1

Ok by why is n0 incompatible with you if he’s socially competent but a virgin? Prob Cause there is something deep down that is attractive about a man who is attractive to other women and/or sexually active
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 01:46 PM
1

the problem isn’t that women only want the best, its that certain men can’t keep up There. You’re implying that there’s absolutely no potential problem with women acting out their hypergamy fully, and that ‘well suck it up men, you gotta just keep up with the super attractive and successful men!’ So 1-I understand the sentiment and where its coming from, and i get it.. its annoying that loser guys blame women somehow for themselves being low value when the problem is their lowvalueness, and not …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 01:42 PM
1

You missed my entire point. Its the in between #2 ‘more stable’ option, Not fully-stable. Yes its been constant war and is obviously bad and could be so much better, .. but its not as bad as truly polygamous societies where super successful/attractive men hoard all the women.. In cultures that permit men to take multiple wives, the intra-sexual competition that occurs causes greater levels of crime, violence, poverty and gender inequality than in societies that institutionalize and practice mono…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 01:27 PM
1

Hmm yep u mite be right
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 01:10 PM
9

Or men feel not just demotivated but also angry and upset.. why continue to be a good little citizen if the society is actively attacking you? So unrest, corruption and anger abound and generally destabilize societies that allow the top % of men to have harems etc(bc so many of the other men are left with nothing).. im not approving or disapproving just saying what part of the theory is.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 04:02 AM
5

Haha noooo, Don’t do it.. theres gotta be a better way
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 03:55 AM
7

Yeah but what ab trying to do something about it? Like educate or bring the sexes together with a common goal etc.. Im not saying never have casual sex, but I mean just not give up all hope and start doing cocaine and hookers every night
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 01:02 AM
2

Yeah Im pretty anti modern feminism but if anyone really feels that way they are insane. Id take Scandinavia with screaming women over a trad-con middle east country any day. But I don’t want to control women personally, I just don’t like hypocrisy and bullshit.. and modern feminism seems to be abundant in both (so does current corporate culture and i hate that too.. doesn’t mean i hate the concept and use of money tho)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 01:00 AM
2

Fair point. But maybe its because society stays semi-stable when Men are degenerate but Women aren’t.. where as if both become fully degenerate it devolves into harems and fully destabilizes society? Just a theory, and Im not saying its right (as in factually correct or morally acceptable) but it seems its possibly like this 1- both sexes acting as degen’s and a brutal unstable haremed society exists 2-only men are allowed to be full degens, and even they have to at least pretend not to be most …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 12:53 AM
14

Yeah but I mean, at the expense of civilization? Seems like the ultimate selfishness. Altho 1-I also partake in the advantages of the decline and 2- its very arguable from a practical sense that you can’t stop history marching forward so might as well enjoy it. But still, something doesn’t feel right about completely letting go and just reaping the benefits without giving it a second thought to its implications. It could just be the programmed guilt talking tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 12:45 AM
1

Which part?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 12:28 AM
12

Alright so whats the answer, to allow the top 20% of Men to have harems again and thus destabilize society? Thats kind of what your implying. Or have monogamy and have tonnes of miserable Women (who can’t get with the 20% top men) as well as miserable Men (who are in the 80%) I think hypergamy is good to an extent (makes us evolve and compete etc..) but taken too far and unfettered can be disastrous. And I think the main problem is Women pretending they aren’t ruthless when they are when it come…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 10:51 PM
2

Yeah, classic mistaking ones own preferences for everyone elses too. Men do it in other ways of course aswell
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 10:40 PM
1

Well yeah obviously, Im not saying it wasn’t part of it.. Just like if a woman had a flat ass, boobs, no curves and an ugly face then she wouldn’t stop traffic. Im saying status is just another thing to be attracted to for women, and not necessarily bc of a ‘faking it’ (again, ruthless golddiggers aside even if there are many of them) I guess the great test would be if he had fame and global adoration at 55 and good energy but was still broke, would he be able to get them? Id say yes.. maybe wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 02:02 PM
1

Agree to disagree.. Or at least, it depends on the quality of women he is having sex with, as well as the type of woman who is seeing it
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:58 PM
1

Lol so what youre saying is ‘I could... but I just don’t want to’ ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:56 PM
2

For sure, very intriguing. Altho I think Men still really like getting with Women that are highly desired by the crowd.. but I think its more of an ego thing rather than preselection tactic
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 04:01 AM
2

Again im more trying to get to the bottom of the cause of the social proof phenomenon, and im saying i don’t think its just a hgh n-count . But yeah im saying I think it would boost his value minimally (bc it shows restraint as well as makes her less insecure that he’ll cheat [even if its good for her respect level to think he can, it can go too far and just have her always insecure or worrying.. its gotta be the middle balance of him not being unable to cheat, but not seeming too eager to cheat…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 03:59 AM
1

Right but im not saying its irrelevant Or isn’t directly correlated.. im saying yes it (high n-count) is solid social proof of his higher value but it could paradoxically be a turn all in one. If you wanted to test my hypothesis maybe you’d show 2 different groups photos of the same guy and say he went speed dating , but say to the 1st group that many women found him very attractive and actively pursued him after the speeddating and 3/4 of the women said they really wanted to have sex with him b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 03:54 AM
1

Yes I agree with this. There is still a direct correlation between the 2 for sure. Just trying to point out its not mainly the lays, but instead the other women being actively attracted to him that is the stronger social proof, lays are just more solid proof but like this woman is saying, can be a turn off (even if simultaneously paradoxically being strong social proof of his worth)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 03:46 AM
2

Sure yeah, and I don’t think it matters too too much as long as he doesn’t talk about his past high n-count (but instead just shows the qualities and attractiveness a man with a high potential n-count would have) My main point is that the social proof of women being actively attracted to him is more important than him actually laying alot of women. (Also thanks for the general encouragement :) )
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 03:43 AM
1

Nah its a combination that creates attraction, they feel attracted OVERALL to a guy who is high status subconsciously, its not separate like youre thinking (unless its a ruthless strict golddigger) Thats like saying men only use/like women for their body and beauty.. it may be the main reason or focus for most men but its also a whole vibe thing. Or better yet, imagine a woman with a perfect vibe, perfect ass, perfect face, but really small or just plain not-so-nice breast. Would you not have a …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 03:38 AM
2

I wouldn’t say zero benefit, infact Im arguing actually it would be a slight benefit if he didn’t have a huge n-count but still possessed everything thing else an attractive guy with a high n-count would have. But 1-is it worth it for the slight increase of her respect? Probably not, she’ll prob get over the n-count easily if you don’t talk ab it and everything else is good so ya i agree with you, im not saying pass up on lays, just saying its not only the n-count but more the potential and attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 03:31 AM
1

See now I disagree there. I didn’t make any comparison to the female equivalent but since you bring it up, fuckbois are definitely higher value to the average female than a promiscuous woman is to the average male looking to marry. Its just not the same when comparing. But yeah they might end up with eachother more out of shared unstable personality traits
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 03:25 AM
1

Yeah I mostly agree. As I said if he ‘somehow’ had the skills without the high count it would be preferable. Or at very least, probably preferable to the Woman if he didn’t constantly remind her of his past high count
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 03:23 AM
3

Geez its like noones reading my post and just commenting (maybe its too long?) I didn’t say having a high n-count doesn’t work as an attractive preselection marker/signal.. I just said its not the best one and less relevant than people make it out to be
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 03:20 AM
2

Right, yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 11:22 PM
1

Makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:24 PM
1

Tell that to mick jagger and similar guys. Its alot about looks, but not ALL about looks
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:23 PM
1

Hmm ya I guess what it comes down to is ability to get laid/being attractive AND being competent sexually and romantically.. and your mind understandably says ‘well to be competent in the bedroom you need sexual experience’ which makes sense But if you could somehow be highly attractive and highly competent sexually while somehow having a Low n-count that would be best.. but again, those things usually don’t go together (And also maybe 0 would freak some women out, so lets just say very low)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:17 PM
2

Ok but thats not addressing what I said at all. Is it not true that the same women that have impulsive behaviours are the same that have high n-count and are also the same that are ill suited to pair bonding? If yes, then What im saying is that yes the RPers have the causation wrong (its personality type and not the actual act of sex that ruins pair bonding) but none the less, the result is the same, those women are less suited for pair bonding right? Actually yeah I guess it is causation vs cor…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:07 PM
2

In the context I used it in it would obviously exclude prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:00 PM
1

No you don’t need ‘some’ experience or alot of experience.. did you read my post? Thats the whole point.. its not about his actual n count its about his ability to get laid.. and its usually even better if he doesn’t have a high n-count (altho again, its rare to have a highly attractive, smooth but low n-count guy.. its not very realistic to find, but it is the ideal still)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 06:58 PM
2

Sure, but isn’t that personality less suited to pairbond well, thus making the result the same? Which would be a less pseudo-science mistaking correlation for causation and more of just a chicken-or-the-egg argument that still has the same result. Or am I missing something?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 06:56 PM
1

Buttt you didn’t. And ive seen ppl complain of a lack of explanation so I guess I took it a bit overboard the other way. Still a valid breakdown tho
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 06:53 PM
1

I probably couldve condensed it yes, but no thats not proving the argument (altho i see the connection, its not a good comparison cause prostitutes mean absolutely Nothing to a guys n-count.. if anything it makes him less attractive so yeah, no)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 06:48 PM
1

I should Add the similarities of his strength(or agression) as well as financial situation. In a similar way to sexual partner n count, most Women don’t want a man who’s constantly acting out aggressively and beating up or murdering people haha. But she wants to see and know that he could if he needed to, but doesn’t and is nice 99% of the time. Thats ideal. But if that perfect combo and restraint is hard to find, she(some, not all women of course) will settle for an aggressive guy who’s an assh…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 05:11 PM
1

I should Add the similarities of his strength(or agression) as well as financial situation. In a similar way to sexual partner n count, most Women don’t want a man who’s constantly acting out aggressively and beating up or murdering people haha. But she wants to see and know that he could if he needed to, but doesn’t and is nice 99% of the time. Thats ideal. But if that perfect combo and restraint is hard to find, she(some, not all women of course) will settle for an aggressive guy who’s an assh…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 03:22 PM
3

Im with you and have experienced the effect in real life.. But I wonder if its more his potential for attracting women rather than him actually having had sex with them. So it would look like this. 1-Most desirable Man (the ultimate female fantasy) The perfect combo. Super Rare. A Guy who is obviously attractive and has many Women clearly attracted to him and constantly going after him, but he doesn’t bang many of them even tho he could... he has a graceful and thoughtful mild restraint and inst…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 02:49 PM
1

Was with you until you said you need to ‘lose respect’ of women. Now im not gonna say ‘Respect all Whaymens’ lol.. but its more of learning to respect them in a different way.. still as a human being, but not like you did before and certainly not on a pedestal. (And In the beginning theres definitely an anger phase that seems pretty inevitable when every boys worldview is shattered, but once u get past that without hopefully taking it out on the world) I don’t know how to explain it but basicall…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 01:59 PM
6

Well thats majority of western women (aka somewhere above 50%.. then when you factor in the 80/20 rule, finding a woman in the west who is high value, willing to seriously date and isn’t poisoned by propaganda is slim to none unless you’re top 5% of men and have an extra discerning eye) So you’d have to date from a different culture , which is 1-difficult logistically and 2- has a stereotype attached to it itself (i.e. “oh look at that guy going to another country to meet a wife, he must a loser…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 05:57 PM
1

Listen im as enraged as the next guy ab the current state of it, its ridiculous. But swinging it extremely the other way isnt the answer. Should be fair. And telling her ‘she should’ve vetted better’ is the same shit alot of people are saying to men now ‘well you shouldn’tve had sex if you didn’t want the baby’ so ya sorry I call bullshit on your answer. They should both be responsible for the kid and both equally allowed to ‘abort’ it with the same time frame. And if she doesn’t tell him in tim…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 01:29 PM
2

Just for the record, everyone saying ‘get a vasectomy if you don’t like it’ is such a dumb thing to say. They are not comparable. Having a single abortion ,unlike having a vasectomy, doesn’t 1- cost as much 2- make it so you can’t immediately have another child with someone else you think is more fit AKA isn’t as permenant for your future reproductive abilities (altho yes it can harm it)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 04:17 AM
2

That doesn’t make sense bc what if she has it thinking he’s on board, but then he can choose after its born to opt-put when she made her decision thinking he would help? No, a better plan is that he has the right to a 1st opt-out only in the same time that she knows shes pregnant and can still have an abortion (this would depend of course on somehow ensuring she must tell him as soon as she finds out too) Same time frame is only fair. And then he has a 2nd option to opt-out after that window/bir…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 04:08 AM
5

Mostly, Yes. But No. its the current hypocrisy and special treatment of Women I think that upsets Men, .. but its just that the unsuccessful Men tend to see it more clearly/are more affected by it. Pain sharpens the mind, to look for its cause. It can also warp the mind into over exaggerating the cause in alot of cases if unbalanced, .. but success and contentment does the opposite, lulls the mind into a false sense of security and underestimating the bad causes. Thats why pessimists are general…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 01:22 AM
6

Its obviously an obnoxious excuse some Women use 95% of the time. But also don’t forget that Women date equal or above themselves in status/value etc..Never below (for long, or on purpose) So tho they’re blaming it on Men, it could also just be Men inherently and instinctively knowing this and realizing theyll have to constantly battle to prove themselves as being high level enough for her or else she’ll leave him, and he can’t be bothered with the hassle. (Writing this out I just realized its b…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/20 01:34 PM
1

*samsquanches **saskatchewans
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 03:59 PM
1

For the 2nd part Im lookin at you u/bonusfruit ! Haha
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 12:05 AM
1

Haha well thats kinda fucked
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 12:05 AM
1

Haha I feel I said quite a bit, just cause you missed the point due to your own biased ideology isn’t my fault. And Pointing out a big difference does nothing to disprove my saying that we are paradoxically very different and very similar at the same time. Do you understand what a paradox is? One side being true, that we are different (or even more emphasized thanks to your reproduction example) doesn’t disprove our similarities, .. cause im not saying an either/or statement. im saying its both …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 12:04 AM
1

Exactly. Apparantly you do tho because alot of ppl need a study to tell them water is wet
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:40 PM
1

For sure, except I would FTFY and say Men and Women are more alike than not, but it doesn't matter. And We are different enough to make big differences. Its a paradox, not an either/or. Both are true at the same time, even tho that seems counterintuitive
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:37 PM
1

True, just like a 1degree difference in angle of 2 lines is tiny at first from the same starting point but eventually becomes a world apart. I get that. But thats not what im saying. To quote u/quarantinedition above I think it makes sense to start from a foundation of equal footing/shared humanity and examine the differences from there It's when you categorize yourself as human and the other group as subhuman that the problems start
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:30 PM
1

Exactly, well said That was my exact point.. our differences are very real, but are focused on and blown up way too much with detrimental effects. Maybe because you have the opposite end of extremists pushing an agenda that there are No differences, so the other side comes in and says there are Only differences.. the truth usually lies somewhere in the middle
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:26 PM
1

Very true, except for the last part of it being pseudo-intellectual masturbation. I think breaking down the differences and similarities can help alot (in 1on1 relationships and Group to Group) with seeing where we can compromise and where we can’t, and how to be more cooperative when possible and when to do things separately if need be etc..
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:25 PM
1

Yeah but how much is it their genetical make up and how much is it just society pandering and conditioning them to be like that (assuming your statement is true) Not sure if its so clear cut one way or the other
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:22 PM
1

Ok but what entails ‘being human’? Alot of shit. Alot of similarities and common ground that is over looked
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:20 PM
1

True
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:20 PM
1

Who said anything about a truce? (Again still seems like youre half joking, I hope lol) Im just saying that theres 2 extreme views that are popular. 1-that we are the same. Bullshit 2- that we are worlds apart and basically different species. Also bullshit. The answer is a paradoxical mix between the 2/ somewhere in the middle (which also varies in degree depending on the particular surrounding culture and other factors) Group 1 focuses so much on the similarities that they start to become blind…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:19 PM
1

Maybe I wasn’t clear enough or you’re misunderstanding my point. Who said anything about wanting gender differences to go away? You just assumed because Im pointing out we are more similar than different that I dislike the differences? But thats not the case at all. My point is its very easy to miss the similarities when we’re obsessed with the differences.. its like the negativity bias of not registering when ppl say neutral or nice things to you a bunch of times, but when that same person says…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:12 PM
1

Exactly! Thats my entire goddamn point here! You mite be the only one who got it
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 10:53 PM
1

For sure
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 10:51 PM
2

Haha had a few drinks and got a little excited, what can i say
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 11:13 AM
2

Lmao. Listen,.. Im not saying we ‘should’ unite for some feel good reason. Im saying we are more alike and united than we realize, naturally and shown through the leading statistical studies, and that that is good to fuckin keep in mind in this sub and in life when we are constantly at war with eachother. Acknowledge the differences without pussying out, but also realize the similarities as Humans! Theyre both paradoxically true at the same time (I have a sneaking suspicion your comment was sarc…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 03:29 AM
1

Righht. Yes, thats very true. But my question is more “even tho ppl are trying to force obviously false ‘we all have equal ability bullshit’.. do you not see our deep and more prevalent similar human needs and wants? And do those statistics that show we are more similar than different, not skew your view into realizing we are more alike in our wants than the general gender war usually presents”
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 02:35 AM
2

Okayyy... Andd? Whats that have to do with what I said? I kinda see the connection, but its super vague atm
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 02:19 AM
1

What?? Pls elaborate, cause i have no idea what you’re talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 02:11 AM
2

Its a fair question actually. I don’t think its so much of them caring about the older women as potential mates like your orbiters. I think its more because older women often set the narrative for the community (through gossiping and sheer will to have their opinions heard) so they can make his life very difficult with their disapproval. Also (kinda the same thing) most men grew up caring what their mothers and grandmothers thought of them, so theres that classic tribal guilt and want for approv…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/20 03:04 AM
2

Hmmm not sure ab all that, as in I really don’t know one way or the other whats best. Altho i forgot option 5-Be a monk and meditate all day. For real
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 04:25 PM
2

Just try to be a chad and AF i guess? What else is there to do. Unfortunately i feel like its contributing to the problem (if i could even pull it off), but i also don’t feel big enough to try to change the problem (it seems like a huge historically cultural shift that is inevitable for late-stage [western] civilization) So ya, 1-Be single and Lonely 2- Be a married BB and (probably)miserable 3-- Try to fck like a top tier guy , but it takes alot of effort (for non-naturals) and still causes emo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 03:31 PM
3

Fuck , this is true (personally and globally) but bleak.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 03:09 PM
1

Yeah i hear. Im just saying not every time a woman chooses a beta means its pure exploitation.. or said in a different way, if it is, then all interactions are exploitation. altho eventually with the betas she usually looses respect for him and becomes miserable and resentful and then does really fuck him over with divorce or otherwise, so maybe youre right
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 11:23 AM
1

If you look closely, 90+% of ppl are trying to exploit, some for money or resources, some just to fill their boredom or for attention. As long as its not their ONLY goal, it shouldn’t be a problem. (e.g. just because the average man during a date with a woman he likes would immediately have sex with her happily if she asked, doesn’t mean thats all he wants, it just means its his main want. Its like a soft potential exploitation if the opportunity arises. Same with that woman if he idk, offered t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 02:55 AM
1

You tryin to discredit my lived experience and gaslight me? Half serious half joking haha
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 12:20 AM
1

Exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 04:21 PM
-1

Its true tho, anyone with half a brain and one eyeball can see that
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 04:20 PM
5

Bullshit. The only reason that men now might care about a woman being more equal financially is because her role as housewife and mother have been steadily declining. Think about it. Its the same reason women in more affluent and stable societies choose men for their looks now, and more poorer less stable times/countries they look past looks much more if he’s able or ambitious or successful.. because if she can have society provide for her or provide for her self more easily, and feel safe witho…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 04:17 PM
0

Why would a man want to be with a woman less competent? Yet men aren’t hypergamous (tho they are hyper focused on looks and youth for similar reasons, just different means.. i.e. his obsession and her hypergamy are in the end tools for them to both ensure healthy offspring, just hers are more focused the long term of its care and his on the short term genetics) (But they both care about both too.. hence why women love gorgeous men and men try to avoid bitches who are callous and seem like bad pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 04:02 PM
14

Yep, thats the whole point. If we are truly ‘equal’ why is it not the same for men? Why would a man want a wife who farms worse than him? Because hypergamy is natural, and so is basing a womans value on her ability to be feminine and birth healthy children (her looks and figure being an indicator of that) and not judged and hyper focused on her abilities to provide. If men judged women by mens standards for most things they’d be in for a rude awakening. But so would men if they were judged on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 03:58 PM
2

“Its like slaverrrry,.. but with extra steps”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/20 02:42 AM
9

there are too many people on the planet now. That might be changing pretty soon, stay tuned to find out.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/20 12:01 PM
3

I said means very little (on the scale of things) but didn’t say it means nothing. Maybe i should rephrase.. it means much less than her vibe, looks and age, especially in comparison to how much it means to a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 12:24 PM
13

Or at least higher value women, being younger as one of those factors of value.. and of Course men don’t value the women the same (even tho women think they do for some reason?)so her having a stable career and house etc.. means very little to a high value guy
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 11:16 AM
1

How do you figure ageism is considered less shallow than heightism?? Maybe for those into the purple/red/blue pill world. In the real world the average (older) man gets shamed and judged way more harshly for preferring and dating only younger women compared to women preferring tall guys. Saying ‘I like a man who’s tall dark and handsome’ is a cliche saying for like a century or more, where as if a man is asked what he likes and the first thing he says is ‘YOUNG’ see how ppl react. Again, i think…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/20 02:28 AM
1

Oh man, the relationships were too complicated to go into too too deeply (another tricky thing about being friends for years before hand) but the 1st one was because she was an abusive (physically and otherwise) alcoholic, even at 17.. and not just that, but i realized id have to spend my entire lifes effort just bringing her up from low to a mediocre ’manageable’ life, and at 18 i didn’t want to do that (especially cause she cheated on my at the beginning and was consistently drunk and out of c…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 12:03 PM
1

Right, i think i get what you’re saying and kinda agree.. basically that some ppl are so hopeless you might as well give them some false hope and white lies to make them feel better, because telling them the truth is useless cause they are unable to improve themselves? Well even that is questionable (i think truth should prevail feelings, but done in a way with tact and love) but i see your point. However, thats not at all the subject we were talking about (unless you consider the entire Female …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 11:42 AM
2

Don’t think its that simple.. , like ‘she knows its a lie , so whatever’ .. no, not whatever. its kind of a big deal. 1984 type shit. Ppl begin to believe lies when they’re said enough (she’ll start to believe and others will to) which is terrible for many reasons, but mainly because the main problem (in this case, her behaviour) is being ignored at best, and lied about at worst, and will therefor never be solved. Not to mention the million other reasons speaking lies and distorting the truth co…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 06:01 PM
2

Right, my point exactly. Its considered ‘polite’ to agree with a womans self-lying. And how about if its a guy who keeps fucking up and its obviously his fault? Only half polite, but most ppl will tell him straight
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 04:45 PM
2

I have (altho this was mid 2000’s so texting wasn’t huge and it was a bit different. Both times was long term friends. Both times they were super hot Both times they never full ghosted me (cause we already we’re such good friends) but gave clear signs they didn’t find me that attractive, but also didn’t want to let me go as a friend (i rarely provided resources so i think it was emotional) Both were the 2 worst relationships of my life Both wanted to Marry me after and I dumped them (tho stupidl…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 03:30 PM
5

And if by some miracle they finally do admit it, its ‘omfg i guess im the worst, i should just kill myself’ or some dramatic shit. Theres rarely an in-between moderate, sober taking account of ones fuck ups and assessing to fix it.. its either denial thinking they’re the best, or crying how they’re the worst (usually fishing for someone to talk them out of that assessment ) To be fair ive seen alot of Men unable to do it too, but far more Women (and the difference being that people will tell Men…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 03:20 PM
3

Also the difference is the world, especially their friends and family, non-stop agree with them and humour them ‘you are way too good for him, you’re right!’ Or ‘he is immature blah blah blah’
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 03:14 PM
5

Kinda yeah, they do. Obviously subtly but they do.. start withholding sex, trying to make you jealous, try to shame you (‘grow up!’ Etc..) cry to their friends and ppl you know
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 03:08 PM
1

What? This is challenging OP. He’s saying it like its not accepted that women make as bad lustful dating choices as men, and im saying that its actually one of the only things i feel like the general public calls women out on equally and is kinda known to be a cross-gender problem, making this a bad post IMO
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 06:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter