TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

getter1 Archive

View 2 posts and 120 comments by getter1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

getter1/r/seduction27/04/11 02:04 AM
0

getter1/r/MensRights15/12/10 12:41 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-5

Feminism is a broad term describing people with many different (often opposite) opinions. Don't you think you should separate yourself from people who you don't agree with? This this the primary thing I despise about feminism. They want to have this big fucking umbrella so that when you ever talk to a feminist, you never know what sort of truths or crazy they are peddling. also, r/mensrights is as much as a joke as r/shitredditsays. Just a bunch of fucking narrow minded self ideological fuck hea…
/r/MensRights13/12/11 06:52 AM
0

I like how you assume things so much. mensrights is nothing but trollbait.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 11:16 PM
-2

I never said they were responsible for the actions, I'm just saying they are being morally irresponsible assholes and I have just as much of a right to voice my opinion that I think they should shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 07:46 PM
0

I wouldn't exactly call an abortionist a baby killer and more of a distortion of words based on ones definition of it all. And really, what does mentioning bill o reilly even have to do with this subreddit? The guy lies on TV on a regular basis.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 07:06 PM
-2

When you run a national news organization that airs 24/7 I think its morally responsible to not say things that would incite the mentally unhinged. When you repeatedly call the guy 'tiller the baby killer' and take this passive, yet supportive stance of the extreme pro-life side, then I define that as inciting a crowd. And yes, I am calling the extreme pro-life movement mentally unhinged and a public mouth piece like o'reilly only spurs on and validates their behavior. I suppose for you, it woul…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 06:39 PM
-3

I'm not sure that O'Reilly should be responsible for the terrorisms, but that doesn't make him a saint either. So what are you advocating here actually? You actually think hate speech is an acceptable form of discourse?
/r/MensRights22/09/11 06:22 PM
1

In order to get to the next level you just need to grind it out. Get enough common mobs out there and then you can work your way up the elite queens and then bam, your max level.
/r/seduction10/09/11 12:22 AM
-5

tits or gtfo
/r/seduction17/06/11 01:03 AM
4

like this
/r/seduction14/05/11 04:02 PM
1

Thanks for the reply. What I was meaning to say though is that it can seem like stereotyping when users throw the terms about without really stating what they mean. And the context in which the words are used can sometimes be misleading.
/r/seduction27/04/11 02:07 PM
7

I won't tell you about being alpha, because 'being alpha' is just a term used by people who like to only see things in black and white. But I will tell you that when you orgasm it will release dopamine into your system. Dopamine in the system is a reward mechanism in the brain and is usually released when you've done something accomplishing. Runners High, post sex glow, it has various names. When you are constantly subjecting your body to these natural releases in a habitual fashion, you are 'so…
/r/seduction27/04/11 01:59 AM
1

Ha ha, yep. I think it would be the best scientific theory out there, if not for the fact that we are empathetic creatures who do subjectively experience the consequences of neurotransmitters. I mean, we can measure brain activity or test test chemical cause of a certain feeling. But we don't know the 'shape' of that feeling is or what is driving it within the brain.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 11:56 PM
2

Well I mean, if you want to bring up reverse causality then you have to define what love means in an empirically scientific term. Does love mean a state of mind that is brought about by neurotransmitters that are released because you are with a person who you share a bond with. But in reality that bond may not be as altruistic as you may think in that the primitive 'motor' of our brain could be highly self centered and the reason why we do things for loved ones is because we are so selfish that …
/r/MensRights26/04/11 11:23 PM
1

We are saying the same fucking thing you asshole.
/r/seduction26/04/11 10:43 PM
0

You failed your reading test in my first reply, you dunce. I said this. There is a difference between looking good while maintaining good hygiene and being a douche bag with a tan who would rather 'improve' their looks rather then their personality. You reply with this. Just because you try to improve your personality doesn't mean you can be a fat slob with no sense of self image. WAT. Maybe all that reading in the sun is frying your brain.
/r/seduction26/04/11 10:36 PM
0

Again you failed to actually READ my comment. lounge out in the sun ONLY because you want a tan Did you see the ONLY there? lounge out in the sun ONLY because you want a tan Did that help at all? I mean, you talk about reading books, but if you missing key portions of my sentences.. can you really call it reading?
/r/seduction26/04/11 10:08 PM
0

Judging by your reply, I'll take it that you didn't actually read my comment and just started running your mouth. I never advocated poor health or hygiene. So what ever dude. My point is, if you go to a tanning booth, lounge out in the sun ONLY because you want a tan, or use fake ass cosmetic products, then your just a clown. What do clowns do? They put on a face and act but have no substance. So if you enjoy being a guido clown, then go ahead.
/r/seduction26/04/11 08:52 PM
0

I'd never want to be with a girl who thinks that 'going tanning' is sexy in a guy. The only way I'm going to get a tan is by being outside while doing stuff. There is a difference between looking good while maintaining good hygiene and being a douche bag with a tan who would rather 'improve' their looks rather then their personality.
/r/seduction26/04/11 06:53 PM
5

Use your introvertedness as an advantage. Play the smart/mysterious angle without getting the 'creepy' vibe. I was always introverted and quiet, and it showed in conversation and meeting people. I've always had problems with assertion. That is until I stopped giving a fuck. While I am still more reserved in when I talk, but when I do, its well crafted and finely executed. Being introverted is OK. Just make sure you lay out your decimation of the playing field when you make your move.
/r/seduction23/04/11 03:46 AM
13

The human brain never ceases to marvel me. There are those who go about completely oblivious to how things appear effects their thinking. And then there are those who are aware of these evolutionary blind spots and exploit them for gain. From my perspective, I can't really think that this is as black and white as alpha males and beta males, but rather its just fools who are on auto pilot. Though I can't hate them for it, they cannot help the state they are in.
/r/seduction18/04/11 03:48 AM
1

With that logic, I guess I shouldn't hate female circumcision until I try it, right?
/r/seduction15/04/11 12:46 AM
8

I'd rather be a beta for a life time then live 5 minutes as a cheating drunk alpha
/r/seduction14/04/11 09:22 PM
1

Considering the amount of comments that don't really like the message of your comment, I think you should rethink your approach and how you want to deliver your message. You may think its encouragement, but others will see it differently.
/r/seduction05/04/11 12:45 AM
11

So the message is that look at these people having a good time while your life is miserable? Wouldn't you think there would be a better way to encourage people other then rubbing it in their faces? This is the last thing a person who is like that would want to see. I think there is a better way of telling people they should try and change their habits if they are unhappy with their choices.
/r/seduction04/04/11 03:57 AM
81

This is the type of shit that makes me think that seddit is just a bunch of macho jock assholes. 'Oh shit, if I want to find a girl I guess that means I have to drop my personal interests.' Fuck that shit and fuck the culture that endorses that kind of behavior. Its shit like this that perpetuates the nerd stereotype. I do online gaming, I'm finishing my molecular biology degree, and I work in brewery and have a decent handful of both personal and online friendships. I don't need some sarging fu…
/r/seduction04/04/11 01:02 AM
3

1970 This is why I left /r/mensrights long ago. There are elements within this group that are not working for sexual egalitarianism. What is the point of drudging shit up from 40 years ago?
/r/MensRights26/02/11 11:01 PM
2

while there is an over diagnosing of add onto children who have lazy parents. I could understand that there could be a lot of doctors out there that also lazy in their investigation of the problem or just not wanting to deal with shovey parents. Ultimately, who is it who gives their children those pills everyday. Its the parents. lets not forget that ADD/(Inattentive) is a very real condition and there could be very possible genetic reasons as to why it is more common in men then women. http://n…
/r/MensRights22/02/11 06:07 AM
0

Aaah.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 05:59 AM
2

Its just girls looking for an excuse. If you hear a girl say they only like tall guys just call them out on it. Its not sexist, just everyone has their quirks and its retarded to think that it makes someone sexist just by prefering specific traits in their partner.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 03:10 AM
-6

Later, both players admitted to authorities they had sex with the victim, who they knew to be too drunk to give consent. http://fiusm.com/2011/01/24/the-beacon-editorial-suspension-of-wittels-maintains-vital-precedent/ Look what happens when you check the retard's sources. Is this what mensrights is? A bunch of people who take hearsay as fact and don't even bother doing their own 5 minutes of research? Fuck I mean, even both of the articles the-spearhead.com links to has admissions of the people…
/r/MensRights22/02/11 03:01 AM
0

And this is why it is safe for me to downvote everything from the speardhead and everyone else in their anti-feminist blog ring. They are a bunch of irrational buffoons.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 01:13 AM
0

And you are a mod? What the fuck.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 01:05 AM
5

I don't think laws will fix this kind of behavior, if people are going to be psychotic bitches then a law isn't going to stop them from trying to hurt someone. But this goes along with anyone, not just women. We as a society need to make it known that this kind of behavior, from anyone, is unacceptable.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 09:58 PM
2

And who fucking cares? Those women are putting themselves out there to make porn. Don't you think that you are degrading women by saying that they are not smart enough to make their own decisions when they choose to make porn? Those women are getting paid for their service, so how is it degrading? Does my masturbating to porn suck away the soul of a woman somewhere? Or perhaps you are just angry and frustrated that other people have a sexuality that is different then your own?
/r/MensRights20/02/11 09:16 PM
2

Well fuck your opinion
/r/MensRights20/02/11 08:17 AM
1

If you think that anecdotal evidence is valid, then you are just a fool.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 08:17 PM
1

What the fuck is going on in here. Lets get the opinion of one women, then lets use that opinion to label feminism as a whole. I'm sorry, but if a person is trying to think that women have the same physical capabilities as a man, then they are not a feminist, they are just insane. And to label them as a feminist is just being dishonest.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 08:00 AM
1

-Herp derp, You sure are right in pointing out your grammatical astuteness. I was wrong to question you. Actually no I'm not. Look into the role of women in Academia and who gets grant proposals more often. Women produce the same quality work as men, with the same precision and accuracy of data, yet it is more often that men are awarded grant money in pursuing research. And it is often held that the opinion of women is lesser then that of male colleagues. This isn't mainstream as most feminists …
/r/MensRights19/02/11 07:00 AM
-1

Awesome reply, I'm so glad you took the time to write out this thoughtful and intelligent response. I will be thinking about this for the next week, I don't even know how I will sleep at night knowing that there are such astute commentators upon this subreddit.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 06:36 AM
1

Way to set an example for your cause. WHATS THAT? A DISSENTING OPINION?! LA LA LA I CAN'T HERE YOU
/r/MensRights19/02/11 06:34 AM
2

Its fun because I like educating. I don't hate you as a person, I just hate the vile logic that has warped a potentially brilliant mind. The problem here is that the more you delude yourself, the more blunted your critical faculties will become.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 06:33 AM
2

I asked you to support your claims. Until you have done so with demonstrable evidence that has been supported by independent parties, then you have done nothing to prove that you are not full of shit. Instead of throwing insults and judging everyone who disagrees with you, why don't you actually back up your own claims. In terms of a logical argument, I do not need to provide evidence to disprove your claim. You are the one putting forth this idea, so you have to be the one to support it with ac…
/r/MensRights19/02/11 06:31 AM
0

I don't know who you are hanging around or getting your information from, but many of the women I know despise being made a victim. Why? Because playing that card in their eyes is a weak bullshit mood. Also, you really need to elaborate on what you mean. Stop making vague references to shit you've read over a blog and start supporting your claims. Your only perpetuating falsehoods. The onus is on you to prove that this actually exists. I stated that this paper only describes the power of claimin…
/r/MensRights19/02/11 01:01 AM
1

What the fuck are you talking about? So your saying that the centuries of wife beating and keeping women in the kitchen made women better off? I'm sorry, but your modalities of thinking are just shallow, skewed and ignorant. Have you ever stopped to consider that the only thing that was stopping these problems from surfacing was the fact that women couldn't voice their own wills in a court of law and get fair treatment? Give women rights the equal rights, then you start to see how retarded our s…
/r/MensRights19/02/11 12:47 AM
1

While you may work in psychology, its sort of obvious that you do not work in the academia realm of it. Cause if you did, you would know that in terms of social needs, desires, cognitive ability and memory are all pretty much identical between the two sexes. If you do not realize that the whole 'social gossip busy body girl' is just a social construct, right? In terms of how the brain operates they are identical, society is different on the other hand. Perhaps you should stop confusing the two. …
/r/MensRights19/02/11 12:41 AM
2

Its so fun to watch you squirm and try to defend your childish sentiments. Like the monkey who can't figure out why his finger stinks so bad after its been in his ass all day.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 10:11 PM
1

No, I'm saying that this study evaluated the status of victim-hood, regardless of gender or sex. Nowhere in this study does it imply that women will only seek out to be the victim so that they can hold men by the balls, and if you think that then you better go back to elementary school to learn how to read, also taking a course in basic logic may help too. The only thing in referencing this study does is show the effects of being a victim. That is all. Its a psychological factor. It can be appli…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 10:10 PM
3

Awesome, lets take conjecture that isn't backed up by any evidence and present it as fact. Lets ignore potential mental issues and the possibility that women who do this are possibly sociopaths and use this to make claims based on all women. Perfect reasoning. No wait, your just a loud mouthed idiot who thinks their ignorant opinion has some sort of academic value. This woman said a few things on a radio show, Damn, I guess she must speak for every woman now and must be right, because who would …
/r/MensRights18/02/11 10:00 PM
1

Thats the point I was trying to make. And why does it just have to be exclusive to our country, shouldn't you be concerned about bettering humanity on the whole rather then focus on our own fucked up culture?
/r/MensRights18/02/11 09:36 PM
-2

implying that men cannot employ this strategy as well? Why not go into an islamic 'trial' and see which way the pendulum swings. Oh look, this study on human psychology explains the way some people behave!! Quick! Lets limit this data and only apply it to the western culture and then claim that all women only use this. Logic.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 04:29 PM
-1

Herp derp. Women don't NEED attention any more then men do. These are cultural memes and gender roles spread by culture. Just keep on projecting your ignorance, it makes mensrights look wonderful.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 04:26 PM
5

Because reading one article based on a single study makes it completely acceptable to attempt at making a causal relationship? Because thats what you seem to be insinuating. Normal people don't just go and kill their kids. Don't think they are just 'evil' because your just deluding yourself. Can you think of any sane reason why you would want to kill your own kid? Also your logic doesn't add up at all. By sarcastically calling her a 'poor girl' and then linking to some article, your trying to sa…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 04:23 PM
4

Who the fuck would downvote this? Rather then downvoting him, why not actually give a reason why this is related to mensrights? Cause I'll echo his point, what the fuck does this have to do with mensrights?
/r/MensRights18/02/11 04:08 PM
-6

Then use modern examples to defend your claims. The last few things submitted here were completely sensationalized and fabricating a controversy when there is little to be seen. "Oh no, a person who said something ultra sexist on some other subreddit!! ITS MAN HATING!! Even though I'm going to ignore the fact that everyone else downvoted the person. Then I'm going to make a self post on r/mensrights and I'll prattle on about sexism and how men are hated so fucking much." Thats how I see it. A bu…
/r/MensRights14/02/11 01:12 AM
-1

Monday, Jun. 03, 1991 This is from 20 years ago. The reason why I'm pointing this out is because I think its retarded that you have to go this far back to find something to gripe about. You know what seriously disturbs me? The lack of critical thinking that goes on within this subreddit. OMG Hitler wrote mein kampf and it got published!?! What is this world coming too! Also, they are fucking words. If you don't like freedom of speech because words hurt you so much then go somewhere else.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 10:01 PM
4

Why are you crying sexism? No one seemed to jump at you for your post, in fact it seemed quite the obvious that everyone was agreeing with you. So whats the fucking issue?
/r/MensRights12/02/11 10:50 PM
2

I'll be the first in line to call out sensationalism in this subreddit but this is just retarded. Are men biologically hardwired to be more promiscuous then women? Yes, but societal influences on conscious decision making gets in the way of this. We are not wild animals, we have control over base instincts. Does this mean that men will usually accept sex when offered or aggressively put upon them? Maybe, if they are submissive and like that kinda surprise sex. Does this mean that men should be f…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 03:27 PM
3

Not to nit pick, because I do think that its fucked up and one sided but.. 1996, 2003, 2004. I think the whole abortion revision is ridiculous to begin with but this guy had to search and dig for 3 cases, one of which happened over a decade ago to make his point? I mean, sure there are holes in the system, but why does everyone here lose their collective shit over isolated incidents like this? If this guy can only find 3 instances of this, is it really institutionalized or is it just poor judgem…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 03:17 PM
-6

Someone has to pay for the kid. The courts don't care who is paying and its easier for them to just tell the man too. Would you be happier if we had a Child Support Tax? Or would you be happy with allowing that child to grow up in what ever possibly poverty stricken environment they may be in?
/r/MensRights02/02/11 12:37 AM
14

Stupid teenager, no clear victims. Stop trying to make another false rape mountain out of this molehill
/r/MensRights31/01/11 12:28 AM
0

When will these people ever learn about how unfair this treatment is. Not only are they discriminating against men, but they are obviously violating the key principles in Hammurabi's Code! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Hammurabi#Examples If anyone brings an accusation against a man, and the accused goes to the river and leaps into the river, if he sinks in the river his accuser shall take possession of his house. But if the river proves that the accused is not guilty, and he escapes unhur…
/r/MensRights28/01/11 05:41 PM
1

The male is the victim, it MUST be a mensrights issue. /rolleyes
/r/MensRights28/01/11 02:19 AM
4

In other words: Stop spending so much of your time on stupid shit and using gender identity in order to justify your fascination in stupid shit. example. Rip enjoy sports, particularly football, because its manly and popular and its what men do in america. I do not enjoy science because they are nerdy and teaching and being a 'know-it-all' is too girly. Its just a thing people do to get others to be more like them. Don't like sports as a kid, obviously you must have caught the gay.
/r/MensRights26/01/11 04:49 PM
5

Humans!!! They can potentially be anything... Don't trust anyone!
/r/MensRights25/01/11 08:04 PM
2

Because he is prefering not to rent to women, not excluding them entirely.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 08:29 PM
1

fair enough
/r/MensRights22/01/11 04:19 AM
0

Well yes, there is nothing that can be done with those people, but do you have any solutions for the system then? Because it seems like one cannot put something in place without taking away from another in these scenarios. In my opinion, unless I havn't seen enough options, it seems the only thing to remedy these situations is legally binding paperwork before anything happens.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 10:05 PM
0

Here is an idea, why not just do away with the idea of gender entirely? Its like a binary way of thinking and reality does not conform to it at all. Its ridiculous to assume that in a modern culture, with exposure to so many different ideas and different things to identify with, that gender roles are even applicable any more.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 06:44 PM
3

And what lopsided medical research are you referring to?
/r/MensRights21/01/11 06:20 PM
5

Couldn't this all be avoided if we didn't sleep with trash? You want to have sex with someone you don't completely trust, well aware of the risks at hand and then cry when things don't turn out the way you want? I'm not against having the procedure, I just don't understand the reasoning. Is it that hard to have a discussion about reproductive shit with the other person? And if you are that concerned about it, either A.) Don't have sex with her or B.) Get it in writing that you don't want it and …
/r/MensRights21/01/11 06:16 PM
28

Hurray for rational responses. Ones sexuality and how many people they are with is no ones business and they shouldn't be shamed for doing what they want with their body. The problem with most people isn't the sexual behavior, its the going behind others backs. If your going to go and sleep around with people, at least be honest about it. The more we are honest about it the more cultural understanding there will be for those who are more promiscuous.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 04:35 PM
1

Because either, a) Shes a dope b) You haven't given her any material to work with c) She doesn't care
/r/seduction21/01/11 04:28 PM
1

Sorry, was tired, read it wrong.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 01:52 AM
2

When she said, "You're a nice person," I knew I had no chance. Women don't look for niceness in a man. "A nice person" is an expression they use pityingly to someone so shallow and uninteresting that they sense no mystery in him.
/r/seduction21/01/11 12:25 AM
-3

Thank you. OP is an idiot.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 11:57 PM
1

Nope. Your misunderstanding it, sexually successful traits are not always environmentally selective. There are many factors that go into mate selection and it isn't exclusive to either or.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 06:23 AM
1

its a well established statistical trend that married people tend to live longer then single people.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 04:01 PM
-1

So what your saying is you do not want to try to find out how to explain the behaviors exhibited by people? and you think behavioral neuroscience would play a very small role in these kinds of issues?
/r/MensRights18/01/11 09:06 PM
-1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_selection#In_humans derp. I wasn't talking about raising a family, rather mate selections. wtf are you talking about, I was comparing this to what we innately seem to find attractive. Do you prefer extremely skinny people or extremely large or people with physical deformations as your prime sexual partners? These figures, to me, show that women are selecting for successful men (whether they think they are immune to evolution or not) because its preferable to h…
/r/MensRights18/01/11 09:03 PM
0

I was speaking about sexual evolution in general from the perspective of a molecular biology student. Your looking into it too much.
/r/MensRights18/01/11 08:50 PM
4

This comment is similar to a feminist saying that men masturbating degrades women when in fact its something culturally universal and hard wired into men to want to think about lady bits and fantasize about spreading their seed. Its evolutionarily wired into women (and most females animals) to judge the fitness of a potential mate because 'sexy' mates tend to produce sexy offspring. There is extreme cost for the women to bear young, so its been wired into their brains (through the most successfu…
/r/MensRights18/01/11 07:59 PM
-7

word. We need to get these pseudo intellectuals out of here and enlighten them about evolutionary roles of the sexes that tend to dominate over nurture.
/r/MensRights18/01/11 07:54 PM
18

inb4 everyone doesn't get that its satire.
/r/MensRights15/01/11 06:46 PM
6

This is why you should retain evidence of ANYONE who you are having a rough time with, not exclusively women.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:46 PM
0

Right. Okay? Is that sarcasm? So you want to tell me that you don't think the whole system is fucked when violent offenders and sexual offenders serve more time in jail then someone being caught with marijuana? So you want to think the system is okay when there is rampant abuse throughout the prison system and that our current prisons tend to keep people in jail, rather then rehabilitate them? So you think the system is okay when pedophile priests can be shipped off to another district and avoid…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 02:41 AM
-5

Blame the bosses who fired them, not the mentally handicap woman.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 02:35 AM
3

You obviously know nothing about human psychology if you do not think crazy people cannot hallucinate vivid experiences. Also, you have obviously never taken drugs either.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 02:34 AM
0

But you know men, or perhaps empathize or are emotionally involved with a man who takes these issues to heart.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 02:27 AM
0

ugh In one ear, out the other. Fix people's critical thinking skills, educate people on what are known frauds and what is and shouldn't be acceptable evidence. Why? Because all this mensrights bullshit is just a patchwork fix and doesn't address the rights of EVERYONE. Instead of narrowly focusing on subjects that somehow effect you why not get around to trying to improve humanity as a whole? And no its not slanted against men, the system is just fucking everywhere. Look at the big picture and n…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 02:22 AM
-2

Firstly, what does all of this have to do with the original article? I was talking about having a refined analytical process. Things like this deserve attention, but I do not think that every piece of shitty thinking should be partitioned off to a narrow issue. So how is the disparity related to this article specifically and to what I was talking about before and will 'fixing' this disparity somehow stop false rape accusations? And as for the blacks, yes I would be as quick to say what I just di…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 02:09 AM
-1

wat.
/r/MensRights13/01/11 10:45 PM
-3

Give me statistics then if you want my opinion. But as I said before, fix the system and educate those involved to know what is and isn't acceptable evidence and keep objectivity intact. How would sentencing disparities be explained after this then? Many things can account for varying statistics. Maybe its just an artifact in the stats or maybe there it isn't being looked at in the proper framing, your really asking me a pretty open ended question here. All I'm saying is fix the system. Once tha…
/r/MensRights13/01/11 10:39 PM
2

Why are you blaming her? Blame society, the system and most of all blame human nature. Lets say someone you know in your work place got accused of being a nazi. Do you think he would get stigmatized too? I don't see that as a mensrights issue, I see it more of a humans need to be aware of how their own minds operate issue. But judging by how you went straight for the term 'this fucking whore', it seems that you seem to be suffering from a lack of understanding as well. so really, what the hell i…
/r/MensRights13/01/11 09:57 PM
0

Yup, she's crazy allright, we arn't going to bother figuring out what specific form she has or treat it, lets just ship her off.
/r/MensRights13/01/11 09:54 PM
2

Why are comments like this not appreciated more? There are too many haters around here.
/r/MensRights13/01/11 09:53 PM
3

Exactly. Too many wackjobs on mensrights claiming that the system is slanted against men when in reality the system is just fucked in general. I bet if you fixed the system a large majority of 'mensrights' claims would vanish.
/r/MensRights13/01/11 09:51 PM
1

Then don't blame the woman, blame HUMAN NATURE and society for the reactions that people face when accused of any crime. Have you ever dealt withsome one who is having schizophrenic hallucinations? My friend's mother used to think that her husband had 2 twins that would stalk her everywhere she went. And to the article you linked, I see that more of a patients rights issue then a mens issue.
/r/MensRights13/01/11 09:49 PM
1

This is a pretty derp article. What is the author trying to get across? That 'progressives' are some how vying against men? Get real. Why is it that most people I see in MensRights hop straight to comments filled with 'omg the crazy bitch is out to get us, our voice is never heard' rather then comments going towards, 'why the fuck can't the doctors decide if she is mentally stable? Is she stable or not? Shouldn't more doctors be called in if they cannot determine this?' How do you know if 'this …
/r/MensRights13/01/11 09:44 PM
-1

First off, 'probably'. Just like how your 'probably' just pulling that out of your ass. Care look up these claims before making ignorant statements? But I'll entertain your 'probably'. how is this any different from someone who has a smear campaign run against them? What if the guy was accused of murder just by sheer coincidence of being at the wrong place at the wrong time and was somehow proved innocent, but lost his job and everything else attached with it. Its a stigma that is placed on him …
/r/MensRights13/01/11 12:22 AM
-1

these stunts could be pulled by anyone though. psychics, anti-vaxxers, homeopaths or any other form of snake oil. They are never held accountable for their acts and the using the claims of 'facilitated communication' isn't a technique just used to accuse men of rape with. Lets say the facilitated communication evidence was never accepted and they had to find something else. What if they couldn't? Where do you think this case would have ended up without it? The practice of facilitated communicati…
/r/MensRights12/01/11 10:19 PM
5

Whats the more believable situations. A. Grandmother is an older timer bra burning feminist who just KNEW that look in the man's eyes spelled out RAPE and had to deck him in the face. B. Grandmother is old, and probably startled and confused easily and punched some dude in the face out of reaction without thinking about it much beforehand.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 06:51 PM
2

Good to know that this place isn't completely filled with the antithesis of men-hating-women.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 06:49 PM
-1

Do no harm? What are you talking about? Are you implying that it was their intent to do harm? Because thats how it comes across to me. And no, you are wrong. You want to change things? Educate. You know, that thing you do when you learn how to use that spongy organ in your head. Since when do people, and above all, institutions learn through punishment? educate our population and make it so that ALL PUBLIC OFFICE POSITIONS that require education in critical thinking. Again, this never would have…
/r/MensRights12/01/11 06:46 PM
3

You sound a little bitter. Its responses like this that are making want to leave this subreddit because these responses just seem completely illogical. So you describe facilitated communication as a 'feminist, whore, cunt' tool for the specific purpose of interpreting nonsense into anti-male rhetoric in order to imprison a single man, because thats just the way 'feminist-whore-cunts' actually are? To me, this still has absolutely nothing to do with mensrights. This is about police officers accep…
/r/MensRights12/01/11 04:23 PM
-1

What does this have to do with mens rights? This seems to be more a skeptical and critical thinking issue for the government accepting claims made via facilitated communication. Also, the family won $1.8 million for the guy sitting in jail for 80 days? That seems a bit excessive if you as me, especially when we consider the amount of money that is paid to people who are wrongly convicted.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 03:24 PM
1

But seriously, who determines what is 'good behavior' and 'bad behavior' See what I did there? I pointed out that your arguments are poorly formulated.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 11:21 PM
1

Only if you want to imagine that you want to place blame on something. And who cares if it is easier to find something to blame, that doesn't matter. Everything isn't always how you see them. And seeing as how little we know about the true nature of genes and how they self regulate and express doesn't give us much to blame. Its just as easy to blame the genes as it is to blame a bad parent. Get over yourself. What does it matter if there are good genes or bad genes. Its nature and reality. No on…
/r/MensRights29/12/10 11:18 PM
1

Was was speaking more about ADHD, not the cycle of abuse. Also, by ignoring the science behind cognitive disorders all you are doing is contributing to the problem. Epigenetics and regulatory genetics have to do with chemical environmental stimuli effecting gene expression, and its actually becoming a booming research field. Why not do some searching around on epigenetics and natal and how they are finding on how much this impacts development later in life. Like, look at how epigenetic factors p…
/r/MensRights29/12/10 11:05 PM
1

So he wants to talk about dopamine levels, and then goes onto to how ADHD is mostly a societal problem while ignoring the regulatory genetics and epigenetics of dopamine biosynthesis? Oh yeah, he's promoting a book, not the actual science of ADHD.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 09:32 PM
6

I'm more concerned about his obvious mental instability rather then him being a 'pussy'
/r/MensRights29/12/10 05:58 PM
1

implying implications about my hygiene
/r/MensRights22/12/10 05:26 AM
-5

I prefer the body I get from regular swimming. I could care less about looking like a meat balloon.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 04:32 AM
3

Less ads like this. Dietary supplements are utter bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 02:09 AM
-1

Because she uses that conniving to gain attention.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 02:45 AM
2

I eat mostly organic whole foods and I still need my ADHD med, what now?
/r/MensRights14/11/10 08:08 PM
0

the toxicity of BPA has been known for a while, but you can't just go and blame that its the sole cause for a certain condition. Thats just retarded.
/r/MensRights24/10/10 06:51 PM
2

What the fuck are you talking about dude? Do you know what its like to have it? Do you know what its like to be UNABLE to pay attention to a very important Molecular Biology lecture for more then 2 minutes at a time? Its not like I'm thinking up ideas and forming concrete theories inside my head, my brain just wanders from one idea to the next in one long series or chain that will skip around an lead nowhere. Mostly its either just fantasizing about stupid shit like how could I be better at Star…
/r/MensRights24/10/10 06:43 PM
-1

next your going to be telling me vaccines cause autism :rolleyes:
/r/MensRights24/10/10 06:40 PM
2

[Citations needed]
/r/MensRights24/10/10 05:54 PM
2

For me ADHD is a very real problem in my life. I wasn't one of the hyper ones who couldn't sit still, my ADHD took the form of me constantly spacing out and was unable to focus on anything but my own thoughts. That made it very difficult for me earlier when I was hopping around form pills to pills. First was Ritalin, which I don't really remember. Then I tried concerta, and that was fucking awful. Adderall was nice, but it burns through the meds so far. But now I'm on Vyvanse and its fucking spe…
/r/MensRights24/10/10 05:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter