| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38 | "We are shocked to learn that the ordinance introduces a gender neutral perpetrator for sexual assault, suggesting that both women and men could potentially be charged with the offence."Holy fuckballs this is infuriating. I understand they have other objections, but I can't believe that in the midst of all this sensation around rape in India, people aren't blowing up at the fact that Women's Rights people would resist better legislation just because it would also hold women accountable for sexual crimes. Like, even if they honestly believe that women rarely perpetrate rape, protecting rape victims with better legislation is not worth it if it means a few female sex offenders ar… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/13 03:02 AM |
| 2 | Noticed this on T.V. this evening.It depends on how much the question was worth. Sometimes it's supposed to be something that most people don't know. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/13 02:45 AM |
| 4 | r/MensRights: why aren't we working together?Slut shaming = creep shaming haha yessss. Women is outgoing sexually - fears she will be labelled a slut when no one actually cares. Man is outgoing sexually - fears he will be labelled a creep which is one step away from a rapist. Picture a crowded bar and all of sudden some guy shouts "leave me alone slut!" Nothing happens. Picture a crowded bar and all of a sudden some girl shouts "leave me alone creep!" We all know what happens. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/13 02:32 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter