| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | A quick question for you, /mensrights/.It wasn't the "simplest explanation". It was two completely unrelated sentences strung together as an attempted explanation. The person might as well have said, "Pitbulls are a lot more popular nowadays than they were 100 years ago. Also, there are a lot more Asians in America" and some how try to draw some sort of meaningful conclusion. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/11 09:47 PM |
| 2 | A quick question for you, /mensrights/.That's one of the dumbest replies I have ever gotten on reddit. Which is saying quite a lot, so congratulations! | /r/MensRights | 10/11/11 08:52 PM |
| 3 | A quick question for you, /mensrights/.Why? I'm not the one trying to make the case. It doesn't make the statement somehow magically more valid just because I didn't provide a counter argument. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/11 08:46 PM |
| 17 | A quick question for you, /mensrights/.You stated a factual historical statement (drunken consenual sex wasn't rape 100 years ago), but erroneously identified the cause of it (feminism's push for sexism). It's not bigoted to point out how you are using logical fallacies to influence people to believe something false. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/11 03:47 PM |
| 4 | Women will always have more worth than men.I'm pretty sure it's a bot. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/11 09:45 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter