TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gibsonunderscore Archive

View 1 post and 243 comments by gibsonunderscore on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

gibsonunderscore/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:53 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I'm glad this was reposted.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:22 PM
2

I wish people like this would just move to a small island and never bother reasonably minded human beings ever again with their conspiracy theories and their Illuminati-like explanations for why their own sappy life full of self-entitled bullshit isn't what they expected it to be. Feminists are indoctrinated from youth to think the world is going to be vicious and violent and terrifying and when it isn't, they start seeing sexism in places where it is not.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:00 PM
4

Ooh. You've got wacky feminism down. You'd be the perfect kind of person to do a tables-turned protest.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 07:32 PM
5

No, I'm afraid other studies outside the UK show similar results. Women under 30 earn slightly more than men on average.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 06:18 PM
3

The article's based on valid research.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:25 PM
7

Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Lucky for us, looking is still legal.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:10 AM
108

Feminists will just ignore this.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:01 AM
1

Wow. You can live on rice, beans, milk and the occasional orange, a month's supply of which is less than $90 a month. The average rent in major cities in $900 a month. Wow. You must be some kind of smug rich motherfucker. It takes someone who has never had to live on rice and beans to say that. I have refused to read any further beyond this. Sadly, I can only let you have some smug last word. But you might as well address it to Bernie Sanders because I'm not going to read it.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:17 PM
1

It was one of many examples of shortcomings in funding. I don't have to explain to the American public how much they spend on their military. But for the sake of it, I looked into it. Really quickly. So quickly that I am wondering why. But the United States spends 600 Billion dollars a year on its military. More than any other nation on the planet. That's four and a half times the spending of China, who takes second place. There's your textbooks, and new computers for the kids, subsidized statio…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:10 PM
-1

But at a hospital, people are there for many many reasons. The same thing can accurately get said of mosques and synagogues. But how many life-risking emergencies will have to get past you into the halls of a mosque? She has her feelings hurt. If that is your justification, we have nothing else to discuss. I cannot condone insensitivity, regardless of the cause it is used to fight. There are lines I don't cross.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:48 PM
1

I can't even begin to address your dream world where corporations are giving everything they can but the kitchen sink. People are deciding between paying the electric bill and buying food for their children. You're still operating on the assumption that all of Wal-Mart's employees work for their minimum wage. Management, supervisors, accounting, payroll, executive positions, corporate offices, and more. Cashiers and stockpeople don't account for the whole workforce. After that part of your argum…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:41 PM
1

Just because it won't solve the whole problem doesn't mean we shouldn't address it. You can't undo what's been done but the American public should take more interest in what their leaders are spending their money on. Don't just brush it under the rug because it's too much of a hassle. That's how they win. Nudge you just a little further and further, while you continually insist that fighting back will hurt your pocket. In the long run, finding a solution will save more than you spend. Invest in …
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:31 PM
1

I was just checking, dude. Like I said, you didn't have very nice things to say to me last time. I'm not looking to make it personal, but I hope you can understand why I remember you better than you remember me. :( At least we agree on something, though, right?
/r/MensRights29/08/15 05:05 PM
-1

But again, there's a very very very important set of reasons why protesting outside a hospital is, and I do believe this whole-heartedly so I'm not exaggerating or trying to put someone down, but the worst idea in the history of protesting. Yes, it's shitty for people to be protesting outside abortion clinics, because people deserve the right to be able to see one of these doctors legally without being assaulted or harassed for making the choice. But it's logical for abortion protesters to go to…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:53 PM
1

I don't know if you're expressing broad frustration at the silliness of made-up gender words, or if you're directing an insult at me. Frankly, we've met before sir, and our last chat went about as well as poking a skunk with a stick. If it made you angry, then maybe you need anger management classes, because it's not really something worth getting mad about.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:41 PM
1

Those were just a few examples of insane things the Federal Government of the United States is doing with tax money. It doesn't come close to detailing all of it, nor does it account for all the poor spending decisions in the other years. So while $120,000 isn't a lot of money, it adds up. Furthermore, don't you at least think the government needs to stop spending the money in those manners, one way or another? Even if the surplus doesn't end up covering everything, progress would be made. Just …
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:38 PM
1

The Men's Rights Movement is intended to fill the gap left behind by Feminism and Gay Rights, to address gender discrimination and violence against men.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:31 AM
6

Please note: this workshop is open to all students with the exception of cisgender men (as it is held in a university safe-space). Great to know that all you have to do to be unwelcome is be born with a penis and not be confused about who you are. I suggest that all the men intentionally do not attend the September 1st session, and then just hold a passive protest during the day of the 8th. (To avoid any unneeded police interference, I advise arranging it to end before the workshop is due to sta…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:18 AM
2

Literally. No pronouns for "you".
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:47 AM
8

This redacted-gender person with breasts needs to keep zir stupid thoughts to zirself. Do yourself a favour and read that aloud to yourself. If you laugh or groan, you are a stable human being and there's hope for you. Meanwhile, for serious... does this school miss the point? I don't know any transgender people, but I imagine if I did, I wouldn't call them "he" or "she". I'd call them "you". Or, y'know, THEIR NAME. Duh-doy.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:40 AM
0

It would be a horribly bad idea to block hospital entrances or cause any kind of distress out front of one. Not everyone there is going to have their kid circumcised. At best, you could be shamed by the community for harassing a hospital. At worst, you could be arrested for obstructing emergency services. Synagogues, maybe.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:30 AM
3

The US has the highest statutory tax rate The highest "nominal", around 35%. A typical American corporation has a 13% corporate tax. Here in Canada, the rate is between 16% and 31%. the only developed country that taxes income generated abroad Canada's got that too; we simply acknowledge that a corporation should not be taxed twice. If the source nation taxes the local income for a Canadian corporation, they can apply with Canada Revenue for a credit or exemption from being double-taxed. only 59…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:17 AM
1

Percentage of tax revenue isn't really relevant, it's percentage of income paid in tax. Corporations make amounts of money that boggle the average working person. But someone supporting a family can't afford to pay out up to a third of their wage in taxes. People on minimum wage are still paying a tenth of their wage to the government. 4 hours of work every week, half of a working day, handed over to the government. And considering the government routinely mis-spends it and allocates it to non-e…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:47 AM
2

I didn't watch the video. I only know Bernie Sanders for his crusade in government to get the working class an easier break in view of obscene corporate tax breaks.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:01 AM
2

October 6th is the date of the verdict.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:09 AM
4

Bernie no! You were doing so well! And then you fucked it all by falling for the factless misandrist propaganda.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:42 AM
1

I just fucking hate Laci Green because she regurgitates all the popular lines to get feminists to inflate her viewership numbers. She has all the value of The Jersey Shore. She doesn't do any fact checking and she doesn't verify any sources. She just bounces other people's opinions off of her hairy armpits and ever-growing middle into the somnambulist brains of the feminist public.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:30 PM
4

This is one of the articles she showed (Video Link to YouTube)
/r/MensRights28/08/15 06:07 PM
1

I think you need to revisit the definition of a "Straw Man Argument". I'll help you along. A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument which was not advanced by that opponent. I have stopped refuting you (though you still manage to keep coming back and being wrong about one thing or another, so that's nice. Consistency), because you are functionally incapable of making a…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:53 PM
4

According to The Post, Baker "has no problem using the accused’s full name on her account, as she said she thinks it’s more important that people know that harassment is happening than whether or not it hurts someone’s reputation." Read this gem of an explanation: “Considering the fact that we live in a society where a man can be accused of raping a woman and, whether he did it or not, can be found not guilty and go on to get a sports scholarship, putting it out there probably won’t ruin their l…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:44 PM
2

I wish I could, but there isn't an ignore button. I have to put up with every time he replies to me.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:23 PM
1

Nobody useful makes that distinction, sadly. (No offense).
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:22 PM
3

And then someone gets you so drunk you can't consent, she sucks your dick to get a mouthful of sperm, which she can use to insert into her vagina and potentially impregnate herself ( which has actually happened ) which she can use to claim she was raped by him (since being too drunk to remember what happened is not a defense) or to claim that he is legitimately the father and win child support.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:20 PM
1

That's the way it was when it happened. I don't even know if my community is progressive enough to feel safe by speaking up now. I was raised with the expectation that I would be sensitive, patient, and acquiescent with women while also being tough on the other boys (which I failed at miserably by being bullied throughout school, and being physically inferior). You really don't want to be where I am, long story short.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:16 PM
12

Parity remains a hot-button issue 52 years after the U.S. Equal Pay Act took effect. On average, women earn 78 percent as much as their male counterparts, the Labor Department estimated in April. When are people going to stop quoting that bad statistic? Every time I hear it, it's like someone's put a Bieber song on the radio. Most people want it gone because it's not doing favours to anyone for it to be there.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 12:02 PM
6

Just don't do what I did and report it to no one. It has done all kinds of damage.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:59 AM
1

I still call myself an Egalitarian, in favour of both genders reaching equality.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:23 AM
3

I had something to say, but you're acting like a douche. So wasting your time is hardly something I'm feeling bad about.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:19 AM
1

The goal is to raise awareness of men's rights. Pettiness is optional I guess. But this is meant in jest. As shitty as gender issues are, you should still approach it with a sense of humour.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:17 AM
5

...I'm just not going to bother. You just want to be right about something, so go ahead and have it. I like the post for what it is. If you want to hate it because it's not austere and timeless enough, then get writing because you're among very few that is that obsessed.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 06:59 AM
4

You don't build a world by putting up the buildings and roads first. You have to know that there will be people coming to live there. In the same vein, the seeds of change come from ideas that are biased and unfiltered. Sometimes it starts as a mess, but that's what conversation is for. That's why Reddit posts has such an extensive comment system that values contribution. It makes more sense for us to contribute and actually work with what we've been given to shape it into a coherent tool.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:59 AM
4

The ever-wise Karen Straughan. She pointed out a key to the Friend Zone that I neglected to mention. Being in the Friend Zone is a constant reminder to you that you wanted something - not from this person - but with this person.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:56 AM
1

I have not yet felt the need to censor myself (though sometimes I can try to look for a slightly less caveman way of saying something), but at the same time, I have come under attack by many people for having a somewhat unpopular opinion (or in one case, for failing to generate an opinion).
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:10 AM
5

Uh... guys? This is a hoax. It's not real. We don't need to talk about this. Maybe if it actually does happen. I don't think it does.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:06 AM
5

But the point of this wasn't for stats. It was a post made by a woman on another woman's Facebook account. I think anecdotal evidence in that event is okay. I believe the OP's intention was to show "hey, look what a woman did to a man-hater for us".
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:55 AM
3

Gender Equality, hard at work.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:54 AM
1

I laugh at rape jokes. I laugh at male rape jokes. I don't laugh at rape though. It's the maturity to recognize the difference that matters. You can't just tell a rape joke to anyone, because you might not really know your audience. But anyone can tell a rape joke to me. And Subway Jared will be amazed when he sees what a grown man's penis actually looks like. Assuming he sees it first. Edit: I also remember George Carlin's best quote on the topic. "You can't joke about rape any more, rape's not…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:44 AM
5

The "Friend Zone" is when you, as a fella, meet a girl you were hoping to try for a dating relationship or at least a sexual relationship with. Despite your most earnest efforts, she is looking for someone who is not like you, but she still likes the kind of person you are and wants to be your friend instead. The Friend Zone is usually pejorative because nobody wants to be there. Women have sort of appropriated the term, but not really. But it isn't sexist. Not everything that is gender-specific…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:39 AM
4

If a man fails to pay child support, she can have him arrested and he'll spend time in jail. He will literally be convicted and serve a prison term for failing to hold up his child support payments. I know this, because my sister is considering having her estranged husband (who is actually a drug-addicted abusive deadbeat) arrested for being in arrears $7000 in child support.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:30 AM
3

Well, pushing her down the stairs is kind of out of the question.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:28 AM
5

Apparently it doesn't matter what you want. It's what feminism demands happen. Women should (apparently) get special preference to ensure that they meet the minimum for equal results. That will mean going to obtuse means to drive women into industries they aren't interested in, barring qualified males from professions they spent their lives readying for, plus providing full, guaranteed maternity and pregnancy leave with pay (which will create a true wage gap in favour of women of biblical propor…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:23 AM
12

I didn't see an item on that list that I haven't seen in practice in real life, or been the subject of in terms of the injustice against men. All 97 of those items ring true for me by demonstration alone, not even by word-of-mouth from a friend of a friend. I mean, real, first-hand experience. Please be a little less dismissive in the future because that is the very thing that is causing such painfully slow progress in men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:08 AM
1

I'm sorry, I didn't realize I had to do all the legwork to see your point of view. ...and really? A journal with a pay wall? Really? I'm guessing you're expecting I'm going to whip out my nonexistent credit card and purchase this thing so that I can see that it's a bunch of bullshit. Your credibility ends here, if not a while back.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 01:00 AM
3

Fem-Legging: Hanging the leg of a crossed knee out into an aisle to obstruct traffic on a public bus or train. Fem-Strolling: Taking advantage of someone opening a door for themselves to pass through the doorway before they can use it themselves. Fem-Shelfing: Wearing revealing or tasteless clothing while expressing criticism of manspreading behaviour. Fem-Scolding: Repeating instructions or statements to an adult in a loud, aggressive, condescending manner.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 12:49 AM
1

If you can't be bothered to present the research, then what are you doing here?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 12:23 AM
16

I bet she was creaming her shorts when she read the UN Women report that said that even though women have equal opportunity in the world today, that they need to be given special treatment and consideration because equal opportunity is not translating into equal results.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 09:17 PM
1

I don't know where to start with it either. Wait, yes I do! Computer coding (whether it's BBCode for Wikipedia, HTML for page building, CSS, VisualBasic, or whatever you want) is a language. It has syntax and operating phrases that the computer translates into functions, using nothing more than visualized representations of letters and symbols already existing on the modern keyboard. Wikipedia's coding language can, therefore, not be any more biased than the language it's coded for (in this part…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 09:02 PM
1

Can you link the article?
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:36 PM
272

What country lets men back out? If the woman wants to keep it, that baby becomes a living weapon to destroy his life (assuming he doesn't want to be a father).
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:04 PM
6

Manscaping: Removal of large tracts of hair from a man's body Mansplaining: An explanation delivered on a topic by a male expert to an amateur (specifically a female) that is perceived to have a belittling tone. Manslamming: Walking without regard for others (specifically women) walking in the other direction, and bumping into them or knocking them out of his way. Manspreading: Parting the knees while seated on public transportation or public seating to occupy more than one seat or imply ones ge…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 07:53 PM
3

And those same people would be flippant to find out what kind of steps would be needed to effectively curtail them.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 07:22 PM
61

"rape culture is the culture that allows rape to happen over and over." How are we defining the word "allows"? Rape is against the law. Anyone who commits or tries to commit a rape is a criminal. They're pursued by the law and if caught, punished. Yes, it does keep happening, but to unrelated individuals, by unrelated individuals. That's not allowance, that is an understandable inability to prevent individual people from committing crimes. The only way to prevent all rape is to prevent all crime…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 06:44 PM
5

Any time a knife is used on a person's body by someone who isn't a doctor, it should be regarded as assault. I got a fair amount of shit from some really intense Intactivists because of admitting that I am not certain about my stance on circumcision (I can neither oppose or favour with enough confidence to put my foot down), this is just generally obvious. If you're not a doctor, don't cut on people. I'm horrified.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 04:58 PM
8

You're making a strawman argument in several places by saying that the editing is biased toward men. It's unfortunately not a fact. And claiming that the downvotes are to justify anything, is also a logical fallacy. First of all, lacking confidence and all those other issues are not gender issues because they occur in men and women equally. Please cite a source if you would like to make a claim that grandiose. The only thing you can infer from the Wikimedia figures is that, statistically, men op…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 04:47 PM
1

That's not what this is about. Like, I'm not sure why you put this here.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 04:31 PM
6

I think you should look at the article before throwing it at someone as evidence, since I can actually pull up evidence from the same article that validates that Wikipedia is not favouring men. Former Wikimedia Foundation executive Sue Gardner provides nine reasons, offered by female Wikipedia editors, "Why Women Don't Edit Wikipedia": A lack of user-friendliness in the editing interface; Not having enough free time; A lack of self-confidence; Aversion to conflict and a disinterest in participat…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 03:53 PM
4

Cheers, Mark Latham. Let's pull the sofas out from under some of these over-entitled double-edged-sword-bearing misandrists and let them get a jarring reminder of reality.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 03:38 PM
37

What blows my mind most is that at the bottom of the article is a little ad or something with a question on it. "Which one of these is the biggest crime? Manspreading -- Manslamming -- Mansplaining -- Manscaping Wasn't the whole article trying to tell me that these things are not a crime, but instead of feminist-made tool to subjugate men's dignity?
/r/MensRights27/08/15 03:18 PM
0

I am going to go out on a limb and say that, without context, I'm not sure the poster bothers me that much. Yes, it doesn't address any more than one scenario of sexual assault, but, the reason why I'm not so bothered is because I read about what happened afterward. A men's rights group in Edmonton started posting its own version (what the news outlets are calling a "parody" when it should really be called a "supplementary edition") that says "Lying about sexual assault = crime" and "Just becaus…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 03:00 PM
7

So much for free and open information. Free to censor, open to revision by feminism, like all of history. Feminist revisionism is a cornerstone of squashing men's rights all over the world. I'm not surprised about this, but I'm very sad.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:34 PM
7

Is anything androcentric any more? Except for ESPN and Donald Trump, I don't think anything public favours men any more. Everything is all about the misses.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:16 PM
0

Yes. I have severe systemic depression from long years of emotional abuse by peers as a child, just for starters. If that qualifies as "other concerns" then there you go. Furthermore, I like seeing opposing opinions. What I don't like is someone telling me what they think my opinion is (Which is what you and others have done several times to the point of abuse), and that I'm some kind of monster for not instantly siding with you. And then you assume that because I don't want to talk to you any m…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:04 PM
74

That's unacceptable. Only six and a half years? 18 months before eligible for parole? Who in that courtroom was thinking about the damage done to an autistic child when that sentence was handed down? Were they asleep or something? If the genders were reversed, that teacher would be in for life, with MAYBE parole after ten years. They would have thrown the book. The Australian justice system failed the boy and his family.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 01:53 PM
0

It took me fifteen years to come to the conclusion that it was okay to abort a pregnancy. Before then, I was in limbo, unwilling to commit to a side because both sides were frankly kind of evil and unscrupulous to each other. And this is what you are doing now. So I am going to aggressively resist whoever tries to guilt and shame me into taking their side, like a warlord enslaving people into his army. This will be my last reply to you. You seem to be in some kind of bizarre fantasy land where e…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 01:43 PM
1

Blecch. I still feel sorry for the young man. Having the threat of it hanging over his head the whole time.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 04:54 AM
0

You've put words in my mouth again. I haven't reached a conclusion. And the attitudes of people such as yourself trouble me. You can't even go to the trouble of being civil and this is where it's gone. This is the "I don't know is not an answer" that jades people from wanting to take part in conversations.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 04:40 AM
1

Well now, I'm so glad that you got this proof from a totally trustworthy opinion piece that extrapolated the results of one test conducted on a small sample size into a very broad assumption. Something opinion pieces are known for. I can't accept your conclusion with so little evidence.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 04:30 AM
0

That explains why I haven't heard it before. I'm from North America and the news outlets never talk about African countries. I lack perspective in all of those items. I don't know what sex and masturbation are like with a foreskin. I've never had a full one in my entire life's memory. I can't really miss something I've never had. As for my remark about the ladies' preferences, you have me. My wording does not mirror the studies, and I apologize for misinterpreting or misrepresenting it. Again, I…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 04:17 AM
0

I welcome disagreement. There are genuinely folks on this thread capable of carrying a conversation without being a total asshole. You should ask them for advice on how to behave like a human being.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:55 PM
-1

I don't have to justify anything. I don't even have to believe anything. I'm a single, already-circumcised male adult with no children. I'm not in the medical profession and do not conduct circumcisions on others. I don't even vote in my country. I don't have faith in my national leaders to represent my interests enough to align with a party faction in Canada. So even if I decided that circumcision was acceptable or totally unacceptable, that really wouldn't matter, would it. My influence on the…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:42 PM
0

I suppose the issue is "what qualifies as a damn good medial reason?" That is the point where I'm scratching my noggin. Where do you draw the line? What isn't serious enough to act? What do you force a parent to tolerate before you allow them to choose an elective surgery for the child that they are going to have to provide care for, both in nurture and nature, and take complete responsibility for in mind and body, until that child is recognized by the law as capable of making his own decisions?…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:24 PM
-1

Unfazed is strong. You flip on the TV, you see the infomercial about the kids suffering from starvation and lack of potable water and they show you the slow zoom in on one of the kids' faces, and he's got that fly walking around on him and he doesn't care. He's just sitting there staring at the camera. Do you give money? I haven't, not once. It's not that it doesn't faze me. I'm being instructed to care about this by someone else who frankly doesn't give a shit about me or that kid. The further …
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:11 PM
-1

So it's for fun and that's all, to you. You are as bad as the people in favour of it, frankly. It's people like you that keep me from making a firm choice. Because I don't want to be associated with a self-entitled brats like you.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:55 PM
1

You linked me to two news articles. Articles that had already been linked, and, by George, articles I had already quoted from! I'm the one who's been quoting the actual law, buddy.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 12:06 PM
0

I will not entertain you demonizing my parents. Good day, sir.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:56 AM
2

Citations needed. I'd like some proof that religion and unhealthy sexual repression are correlated. Prove to us that gaybashers are secretly in the closet. This is bound to be a fucking EPIC response.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:44 AM
1

I just showed you, not once, not twice, but so many times that counting seems like a joke, that the actually printed and stamped and sealed law in Hong Kong says that you're a fucking idiot. You're actually accepting an online newspaper over a transcript of the official Hong Kong Penal Code itself to get your information about the legal status of a youth offender. That's like taking a murder trial in America and accepting embittered FOX News coverage over the trial transcripts. Like, duh-doy. Ma…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:34 AM
-2

I'm not the one who made the comparison. Someone else made the comparison. I'm just showing how ridiculous it is. See, I looked into it, and circumcision is recognized Western doctors as able to reduce risk of infection around the glans, risk of urinary tract infection, and a few other small things that could be a risk at any point in a person's life - including infancy. Never saw a mention anywhere (except here on Reddit) about stopping HIV. Even WebMD seems to think that's bullshit and that's …
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:21 AM
18

This Laurie Penny would be better off not representing us, fucking off with her other Feminazi Kamerades and letting men handle our own shit. I really wanna have an in-depth look at this misandrist-in-pink just for a giggle. this 28-year-old feminist, journalist, author of five books and social justice warrior Ooh, I have high hopes for this already. She acknowledges men are struggling to adapt to economic and social upheaval, and that they need help No dear, we need you and your crazy friends t…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:07 AM
1

As part of a plea agreement, she was sentenced to a 10-year probation term. She also must register as a sex offender and pay a $1,000 fine. Prosecutors say the plea bargain was made with the approval of the victim and his family. I'm glad the victim got a say in the agreement. Though I probably would have asked that in place of a lengthy and costly probation term, that she make $1,000 annual contributions to a charity of my choosing for the next 10 years. And then I'd have all the contributions …
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:22 AM
2

Strapping a bomb to your chest and blowing up a bus full of people fetching groceries is not a sign of an underused cock. It's a sign of a brainwashed or sick mind. How did you organize this in your head? "I wonder if Islamic men wake up and say 'I'm just not getting laid. I guess I'll have to take as many people down with me. Now where did I put that Islamomatic Incendiary Blue Balls Correcter. I'm going to need it for what I have in mind!" I do seriously believe that it's coincidence. Actually…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:09 AM
2

Is the bail part of this story so important that it needed to be in the title of the thread? That's a bit misleading, innit? I read the article and the bit about bail is all the way at the bottom! The article doesn't even make a big deal of it. She has to report to the police twice a week. It's not like she's going to expertly slip away, if her brilliant work keeping things inconspicuous is any indication. I'd honestly rather the reality of prison sink in when she's on day 7 of 1460, rather than…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:51 AM
0

I can only argue that it wasn't harmful to me. As such, I can't speak for others. What I did do was look into the issue after admitting I didn't know the first ounce of fuck about it. I'm working off of 16 hours worth of research. I think I prefaced my very first comment with the acknowledgment that I didn't have any upfront knowledge of circumcision. Just a bare general understanding of the state of circumcision. Here's my argument, since it's apparently escaping everyone. Here is my assertion.…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 08:56 AM
-1

You again? Learn not to talk to people like a cunt. Or power cable. Whichever.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 08:45 AM
-1

I've decided to stop replying to comments like this. Talk to me like a human being and we can try this again. Otherwise, kindly trip over a power cable.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 08:30 AM
1

She didn't commit a crime, apparently you've not learnt anything. I have no idea why you have said this. It's like a comment in a vacuum. Like, you might as well have said ducks are purple. Why do you now think she did not commit a crime if you believe that all three children participated together? You can't have your cake and eat it too.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:52 AM
1

Why are more male officers killed? Because of random chance. The crime responded to and the cop responding are never the same. There is no predictability to the outcome of the situation. You cannot achieve 50/50 fairness when no variable of the situation can be pre-determined.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:41 AM
0

And people are claiming that I have a narrow point of view, when I'm up against that?
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:31 AM
0

20% of males are circumcised. Vaccinations and circumcisions are nothing alike (apples and apples please, not apples and oranges), and my genitalia wasn't altered for fun. At least I hope it wasn't. And Gibson refers to William Gibson, author of Neuromancer and grandpappy of Cyberpunk in all its neon dystopian glory. I don't have enough passion to play the guitar. Or talent.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:33 AM
-2

I'm not arguing in favour of circumcision. I thought I made that clear. Like, every time I've discussed this, I've had to reiterate that. Just how many people here actually read what is written? I'm starting to feel like I'm wasting my time and that people are cherry picking the five words they hate the most about my comment and then go nuts over that. Even you summed up my response as "Nuh uh". So why should I really keep entertaining you by trying to convince you that I'm not in favour of circ…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:10 AM
1

Oh. Okay, thanks. Clears that right up. Also, agreement.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:53 AM
1

But... they are guilty. Like, there's no... like, I don't have to... THEY'RE FUCKING GUILTY. They had sex with a minor. Guilty! Nothing has changed! Even if she was all about it! The two boys have still committed a crime! The only difference is that... sigh for the last time, IF SHE WAS CONSENTING, SHE COMMITTED A CRIME TOO. I don't know how many times I have to write that down before you stop bouncing it off that thick skull like this is the first time I've ever mentioned it. Like, having to re…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:38 AM
-1

My parents didn't have me circumcised so that I would be an acceptable present for my prospective wife. A woman whose labia is missing, is missing it because her vagina's been sewn shut so that she won't be tempted to cheat. Also, I'm not a woman. I have no labia. So I can't speak for them. All I can say is that my circumcision did not harm me and I do not feel as though my opposition would be valuable. Parents who don't vaccinate their kids are doing the opposite of helping. It's medically spea…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:17 AM
-1

Quote where I said that. Please, quote to me where I said "I'm happy to see little boys being mutilated". I'd love to see the thirty second drunken stupor that must have resulted in me going from... I don't know if I am against it. I don't have a bad personal experience to relate to it and I'm not a shy little sheep that baas and runs with the herd to... WOW CIRCUMCISIONS FOR EVERYONE I'm really curious to see where your trolling bullshit attitude has managed to dig out the idea that just becaus…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:59 AM
2

Wow! I totally didn't expect The Guardian to marginalize men's rights! WHAT A SHOCKER!!!! Hashtag-sarcasm.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:45 AM
-1

I know how I should feel. I've lost things since then that are far more valuable. I just don't really feel anything, I guess.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:35 AM
1

You're misrepresenting the law as it was written. You're also misrepresenting the articles that report on it as evidence that only girls benefit from this. See, I've read the law and I understand some legalese. The section I've only repeated to you a thousand times, Section 122 of the Penal Code in Hong Kong, applies to males and females, regardless of age. The reason that the provision for boys was added was, yes. To protect girls from boys who could attack them. Because there was precedent for…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:24 AM
0

Well, I only have another forty years or so on this planet and I don't plan on fucking it up any worse by having kids of my own. That means I don't have to impart any wisdom on them that will influence their lives and their decisions. So my inability to stand with you (or with the other side) is really a zero sum argument. Consider me lost in the forest.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:12 AM
-2

You're the one with all the links to circumcision videos and fetish websites, and I'm the one with the fetish? Good sir, I do believe there's a flaw in your logic.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:00 AM
-1

As someone who suffered sexual assault as an adult, and horrific bullying as a child, I can tell you that you don't always choose to feel damaged. I am damaged. The last thing I want is to look at my parents and feel about them the way I felt about my student peers as a boy. Running home in a panic with 15 other boys hot on my heels. If I wasn't fast enough... well... Mom kept plenty of ice in the freezer, and she was fortunate to grow up with a nurse for a mother. Dad wasn't the best at making …
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:42 AM
1

So I suppose you're going to claim that despite the fact that they keep specifying boys but actually mean boys and girls? The article uses the word "boy" five times in the article. Four times, they were referring to a specific child. The fifth time it was used was here: “the ancient presumption that a boy under the age of 14 is incapable of sexual intercourse is not in accord with the facts and perhaps it never was" Okay, so they don't mention girls. What does that have to do with you accusing m…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:27 AM
-2

Damn. Uncircumcised penises have a very unsettling appearance to me. They kinda remind me of seeing a nine inch clitoris. You realize you're inadvertently making me grateful that I was cut. Also, I was circumcised 30 years ago. If there was a scar, it wasn't very big because I've never picked out a scar or evidence of scar tissue on it.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:14 AM
-1

Fine, but stop shitting on me about it. My good fortune is not an invitation to even the playing field by making me feel like I'm disgusting for not being disgusted for you. And I think I really need to point out. I'm not happy with a circumcision. As I keep trying to tell people. I don't have a strong feeling one way or another. I don't remember anything about it and have no traumatic memories related to being circumcised, and no noticeable health problems. I just don't have any reason to get m…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:00 AM
1

Nope. I read that article. Not sure how it demonstrates that boys and girls are treated differently. In 2009, two 13-year-old boys were convicted of indecently assaulting a 12-year-old girl despite evidence of intercourse between one boy and the girl. This seems to imply that one of those boys got off easy, because "indecent assault" isn't a rape charge. And it seems there was evidence of rape. But neither boy was convicted of rape. So in one case we have a boy who avoided getting life in prison…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 12:39 AM
-3

That isn't my opinion, though. Like, that's completely not my opinion. I can't understand how I couldn't have been clear enough. That's not my opinion. "Fine and dandy" wasn't even remotely part of my post. It's not even part of my vocabulary! See, the thing is, I am underinformed about circumcision. I accept that. That's part of the reason that my opinion is, and I'll put it in big bold letters for you so that you don't miss it this time-- I DO NOT KNOW It's not fair for me to speak up and prot…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 12:19 AM
-2

If this is human rights violation, shouldn't I feel violated? The only person I feel violated by right now is you. I get it, you don't think cutting off parts of infants for no fucking reason isn't terrible. You're wrong. It is a human rights issue. You mean "You don't think surgically removing mucocutaneous tissue from the head of a child's penis for perceived medical benefits at the request of the parents isn't terrible". Because the way you say it is very misleading. And the answer to that is…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 12:03 AM
1

Well, umm... I don't want to sound like an asshole, since you seem to be coming at this like a nice guy, but I do already know this stuff. I mean, I haven't known all of it all this time - some of it has come from research today. But I really do know all of these factoids you've given. I still feel like I'm meant to feel ashamed of having a cut foreskin. Like somehow my parents hated me or something so they had my penis trimmed around the foreskin so that I can't masturbate or something. I mean,…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 11:51 PM
-1

I have no idea how you reached that conclusion from what I said. I mean, it's not altogether a bad stance to have. It's altruistic. But it's not what I said. Not even close. I trusted my parents when I was young. And today, I trust that they made the decision that they believed was best for me. I have no ill effects because of it. So how can I really demonize it? I'm not going to go telling people they should circumcise their kid, granted. But I don't think I have a strong enough position to say…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 11:37 PM
1

I wish I could send Ms DeCrow a token of appreciation. More thoughts like this, please!
/r/MensRights25/08/15 11:14 PM
-1

Hm, interesting. I've never seen a circumcision performed before. Normally I'm very squeamish, and I was expecting to see blood. The baby was crying quite a bit! But I noticed that he was just generally screaming. Because, y'know, he's a baby. His screaming didn't get worse when the doctor made the cut. In fact, he seemed to calm down during the incision! And there was no blood. I thought there'd be blood everywhere. Boy am I relieved that it's not a bloody procedure.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 11:02 PM
-2

Uh... I'm sorry, what point are you trying to make? I'm confused. Is that the only real problem with the lobe of the ear? Risk of cancer? That's not really a strong enough reason in a vacuum to justify it as a comparison to a circumcision. There isn't just that one little... no. It doesn't work that way. You can't compare apples to oranges like that. It's a horrible leap in logic. It's as bad as the fingers and toes guy.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 10:50 PM
0

Are you serious. No really. You're trying to make me feel like I have a disfigured penis, like I'm somehow less of a man because of a decision made by people that I inherently trust. People I believe had my best interests in mind when they made the decision that they did. And you want want me to feel like my genitalia is mangled and incomplete. When I would rather think of it as simply "different". Ordinary doesn't mean "The Blueprint Upon Which All Others Should Be Modelled". Ordinary means "un…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 10:40 PM
1

Holy shit on a stick. Really? Are you this dumb? Okay... I guess I have to drag myself through another post to you. Let's start the time-wasting clock again... 1: I've never attacked your position. I've attacked your attacks. Because you've been on the offensive since minute 1. I'm bothered that the OP forcefully injected the supposition that she consented when the article never suggests she did. It never even discusses the consent. Because the cops never talked about it to them. That's why I th…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 10:27 PM
-1

WOW. I'm reporting the fuck out of you for that.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 09:41 PM
-8

See, the thing is, I don't feel like I've been robbed of anything. I didn't even know that my genitalia was not naturally supposed to have that appearance until I was exposed to an image of another penis for the first time in sex ed at 13. And when my father confirmed that I was circumcised and he didn't seem to be bitter about it at all (in fact, they had both agreed on it before I was born), I didn't think about it again. Literally. Until today. And frankly, if I look down at myself I still do…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 09:30 PM
-3

Did I say that? I said "I would not get a tattoo" because in my own experiences and by speaking within my community, they can cause infections and swelling - and they look unsightly when you start aging. I'm not comparing anything. That and human judgment is full of illogical inconsistencies. I like tomatoes and hate ketchup. I smoke cigarettes but I won't skydive and I won't fly an airplane because I'm terrified I'll die doing it. Holy shit. Is this entire subreddit this presumptuous or are we …
/r/MensRights25/08/15 09:02 PM
-7

No four-fingered kid is going to have an easier time with anything. No one-eared child is going to have a reduced risk of ear diseases (in fact, that would probably make the problem worse). No four-toed child is going to have a reduced right of foot fungus. Your comparison is flawed. Please select a better comparison.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 08:45 PM
1

What??? You're saying you have the right to tell me my opinion is wrong? Fuck you, buddy. You have the right to disagree with my opinion, not to tell me I'm biased against men. The OP says "nothing to indicate" but the article didn't indicate that it was consensual either. THAT is bias. He injected that into the title when the question of consent was still indeterminate (and still is). See, the problem here is that you think that them having sex is fine. It's not. Law says it isn't. Two boys on …
/r/MensRights25/08/15 08:34 PM
1

See, I'm looking at it from more than one angle. You're so desperate not to look like a feminist that you've latched onto the idea that there is NO way this could have been against her will, while I am willing to entertain the idea. And because I did, I did research into the law. See, whether she consented or not, it's a crime. Unless she somehow coerced both boys into having sex with her and filming it in a manner that the two boys were unable to refuse, then she would be the aggressor. And tha…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 08:22 PM
-11

1: First link broken. Second link prefaced with "To date no study has investigated whether this dramatic alteration in the male genitalia affects the sexual pleasure experienced by the female partner or whether a woman can physically discern the difference between a penis with a foreskin." So, frankly, I didn't go any further. It all seems like unresearched assertions and interviews with people who felt a change. Also, odd that your supposition is more or less refuted by the third line of the ar…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 07:56 PM
1

Well, it's not men's fault that women aren't signing up for the force. And it's not women's fault that they're biologically less predisposed to occupations of high risk and danger, therefore statistically less likely to even join the force. That statistically lowers the likelihood of a female cop losing her life. So technically it's skewed, but it's not skewed unfairly. There's just a larger pool of males to pick out of. Random chance goes the other way too, because it could also happen that a l…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 07:11 PM
-9

Well, babies are rapidly growing so a penis piercing wouldn't be too wise. It would need to be removed and replace regularly. And I'm cringing at that thought just from the pain of being repierced. Eeeh. And tattoo ink isn't even safe for adults. I wouldn't get a tattoo. Too many horror stories about people getting infections from tattoo pens.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 07:00 PM
-11

Buddy, fast forward yourself to 2015. What reasons TODAY, in society NOW that is still legally acceptable NOW for these procedures? Do you really think people get their sons circumcised so he won't masturbate? I can tell you from experience that masturbation is not difficult with a circumcised penis. So if it was historically true then, they must have debunked it. Furthermore, I'm just going to leave this illustration -NSFW! which shows the steps of circumcision. All four of them. Because appare…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:50 PM
1

Holy fucksticks on a ham sandwich. You remind me of my friend's wife, treating someone else's opinion with this kind of shit. First of all, I responded to your remarks twice now so I'm not going to broken-record myself. It's boring. So I'm just going to cap this retard conversation with this. I AM ALLOWED TO BELIEVE THINGS WHILE ALSO ACKNOWLEDGING THAT I DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO EVERY FACT AVAILABLE. IF I HAD EVERY FACT AVAILABLE TO ME, THERE WOULD BE NO POINT IN A DISCUSSION Stop being a fucking a…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:38 PM
1

Bias is a strong word. Do you believe I think that all men are guilty at first blush? Because if so, you're so fucking wrong that someone should slap you for it. I read the same article that everyone else did. The girl was found at home and was taken to the hospital and the boys were arrested. They video recorded themselves having sex with her. Security guards saw the incident on CCTV and called the police. Sorry if "1 hospitalized, 2 arrested" sounds blatantly suspicious to me. Sorry if "2 boys…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:28 PM
-15

How big is your foreskin? It's skin. It's a loose flap of skin that encloses around the glans. Like, what are you getting on? As for female circumcision, I'm researching this one on the fly and it's not easy because most top search results are rather scathing and don't offer much fact to explore. I've found a couple of sites though, from both sides of the table. Let's start with what's actually DONE in these cases. For a male, the procedure involves incising the skin covering the glans, peeling …
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:15 PM
1

Okay, I am not sure where that is supposed to be relevant to the conversation. First of all, why are we picking six numbers at random? Cops are not killed six at a time. Second of all, why are we looking at the numbers? There are two genders on the police force. Ladies and Gents. (Let's not do the transgender debate, this thread started at "Men Cops vs Lady Cops" and that's where I'm keeping it) So why we're drawing numbers in your example instead of the coloured balls, is beyond me.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 05:40 PM
-18

Nice strawman. Considering nobody cuts ears and fingers and toes and stuff off at birth. This is more like getting a piercing than getting your limbs lobbed off. It's not like they remove the whole penis. They make incisions into and remove the foreskin to expose the glans of the penis. WebMD says that circumcisions can reduce risk of urinary tract infections, reduce risk of some STDs in men, reduce risk of penile cancer, help prevent inflammation of the glans (the bellend), and fix a condition …
/r/MensRights25/08/15 05:30 PM
1

Stop being blame-oriented. I spoke based on what information I had. As information changes and becomes more clear, so will my stance. Just like every other person on the planet. You think scientists apologize when they find out something that changes how we see the world? They go "oh, looks like we just change what we accept to fit the evidence". If I was backpedalling, I would be taking the whole thing back and saying no one should be getting in trouble. All I'm saying now is that "if the cops …
/r/MensRights25/08/15 05:16 PM
1

Why would I retract something I still believe? I still believe the girl didn't consent (which I am allowed to believe as the police have not confirmed that there was consent, they stated they did not feel there was a consent issue. That is not yet a fact). So I think the girl should go to therapy. Hell, if the boys aren't being jailed, I think they should see a psychiatrist too. It'll be good for them.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 05:05 PM
-9

Well, it's kind of a hard thing to leave up to the kid, isn't it. Now, I was done at the little tiny stage and I don't really plan to have kids. So I guess for me it's kind of already a fait accompli but I would need to look into any potential health hazard of not being cut before I could really competently say if one is safer than the other or if both are equally safe/not safe.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:55 PM
2

I read all 19 comments up to the time I posted this and I really think the only way I'll understand this is if I spend about two or three hours researching. But what I seem to be gathering here is that this Duluth model is to favour the women in a dispute or battery case or something, because it... yeah, I am really not getting it. It sounds like a bunch of really intense bullshit that a misandrist tries to talk circles around people with until they're confused enough just to say "fine, just go"…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:40 PM
1

If YOU saw it as me trying to force others to accept my point of view as gospel, that's YOUR fucking problem buddy. I'm not going to spend an hour running through everything I type to make sure that I'm not accidentally saying something in a way that may to some people be construed as blah blah blah that's the kind of requirement that a social justice warrior would put on me. I inherently reject that. I say what I say and everything anyone says should be taken as opinion UNLESS A FACT CORROBORAT…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:28 PM
1

I said it a squilliontacular number of times. If you're too busy being an asshole trying to be right to read what I've written, then just stick to insulting people's genitalia so that I don't have to keep answering the same question over and over and over and over. And over and over. And over and over and over. And over. And over and over. And over and over and over and over again.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:14 PM
3

The official estimate was 30% female users. The extra padding was dummy profiles to make the numbers look even to male users.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:04 PM
4

This is one of those things that makes me mad. I've heard stories about women doing specific things after sex to better her chances at getting pregnant so she can use the pregnancy against the man, but this is terrifying. Knowing that someone can use ejaculate from oral sex to impregnate herself, shit. I guess masturbation really is the only safe way left to enjoy one's self. Or flogging.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:35 PM
1

Way to read each comment in a vacuum buddy. I think I'd said it all over this thread by now, to the point of EXHAUSTION. -if she wasn't consenting, she would need therapy. Because rape is traumatic. I know. -if she was consenting, she should be penalized along with the boys. Now it's time for you to admit that you're either trolling or you're an idiot that reads half of what he sees.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:18 PM
1

Saying that I think consent laws should be enforced and saying that I think the age of consent should be 18 are actually two different thoughts. They just happen to be on the same subject. See, in some places the age of consent actually is 18. In some places, age of consent is actually enforced. Both of those things are good. I would be even happier if they both existed simultaneously. I can't hold other people to that standard because I am not the law. I do not write laws. I do not change laws.…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:04 PM
1

If I don't know what puritanical views are, I must not be a puritan. And since I'm rather obsessive about research, I did this tiny quick little Google search to see if I fit the bill. Now, this is literally just the dictionary definition of the word, but let's see how we fare here. "very strict in moral or religious matters, often excessively so; rigidly austere. (sometimes initial capital letter) of, relating to, or characteristic of Puritans or Puritanism." Now, the Puritans were a religious …
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:53 PM
2

No, you are misunderstanding. It's ENTIRELY chance. The numbers would be unsettling if everything happened evenly to men and women. That's like getting mad because more men win the lottery, or more men are selected for jury duty or something. We're not talking about a system that hand picks who is doing what. Patrol cops respond to situations because they're the nearest to respond. Female cops are probably injured less because pure chance puts them less often in the way of serious danger, exasce…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:15 PM
1

The puritanical thing again. Under HONG KONG LAW, let's keep this in mind, IT IS CONSIDERED RAPE. Doesn't matter what I consider it. I consider it objectionable. I consider it worrying, frankly. Children having sex. If you call that puritanical then boy, you have some funny ideas about what Puritans are.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:51 PM
1

N...no. No, it's not different. I don't know where you're getting this "defend" nonsense from, but this is like being caught in the act, dude. Mid-thrust. In between moaning. That sorta thing. Government can't do anything because infidelity isn't illegal. Random lunatics aren't going to firebomb you for using Ashley Madison. But when your wife finds your email address on the data dump, good luck not losing half your shit.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:38 PM
1

There is a difference between having a strong opinion and taking it personally.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:25 PM
1

That's ridiculous. If they're in an open marriage, why would they need to use a discreet website?
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:15 PM
1

Puritanical is wanting to wait for marriage because of God. I'm agnostic.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:04 PM
0

Also, am I the only one who is going to point out that Ashley Madison let cheating women on for free, and then nickel-and-dimes every man that logs in. Pay to read a message from a woman (which was sent to him for free by her), pay to initiate contact with a woman, pay for real-time chat. Sounds like a cheap late-night sex chat hotline. In addition, only 30% of the population are even female. The webmasters load the server up with dummy offline profiles of fake women so that the overwhelming sco…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:00 AM
0

Wow. Am I the only one thinking about the people these dicks are cheating on? Isn't anyone concerned about what's fair for the people that this website is alienating? I wouldn't have hacked Ashley Madison myself, but I would be delighted to see the website collapse. I hope the lawsuit bankrupts them. There's no moral high ground for the "victims" of the data lift. They should have been using their time and money to rescue their marriage instead of blowing it online on some nobody-knows for weird…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:44 AM
-3

Ugh. Not these questions AGAIN. Just assume I gave you a smart ass answer that enraged you into hating and wanting to troll me too, because I'm sick of answering this shit for the tenth time. Then we can skip the trolling because I'm going to assume you're terrible at it. See how much time that saved?
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:33 AM
-1

Oh, the cops aren't allowed to discuss ongoing investigations. So this must still be under scrutiny. I'm not saying it must be how I am supposing it. I'm saying that it's the scenario I believe the most. It's the most likely based on the information I have and based on lack of an existing precedent.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:21 AM
-1

Oh, hey. I guess I have to kidglove you like my sisters needed. Do I have to coddle you and tell you every time I say something that's opinion? Considering how often I present quoted and cited facts, that a reasonably intelligent person should be able to tell the difference between presenting something as fact, and presenting it as my truth. You're a real card.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:09 AM
-1

One way or another, the boys did something wrong. If all three were consenting, the boys are still guilty of having sex underage, in public. If only the boys turn out to be the willing parties, then, it gets more serious. Whether they'll actually be charged and sentenced is a different thing, since the South China news outlet quoted Hong Kong civil servants as stating that children are rarely convicted. That's why I think they should be introduced to detention. Scare the dumb decision out of the…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:48 AM
-1

They don't appear to be facing charges at this time. It's likely that the investigation is incomplete and that the charges are being suspended until it can be determined just how many people are willing partners in this situation.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:35 AM
-1

I never did. Nowhere did I say "all people should follow my example because I'm right and my view of sex is the correct one." I've gone so far out of my way to make the point that my point of view is OPINION that just happens to be surrounded by some facts. I'd rather others have the ability to trust long term partners, which I cannot do.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:23 AM
-2

I don't know if anyone told you, but the boys were released.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:08 AM
0

Sorry, where are you getting the impression that statutory rape against a 12 year old boy isn't illegal? Lemme crack out my old, handy, Hong Kong Criminal Code. From here you can see that both boys are within the age range to qualify as a "Child" (under 14). The girl as well. On the same page is this excerpt from the Hong Kong criminal code; 'Indecent assault’, Article 122 of the Penal Code, Crimes (1) Subject to subsection (3), a person who indecently assaults another person shall be guilty of …
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:55 AM
-1

Well, how would the article know that? It's an ongoing investigation what police would start talking to the press about what the victim said happened before the investigation is over? This is the second time you've insulted me. First, I was "fucking crazy" and now I'm "fucking obtuse". So I guess for my finale, I'm "fucking done with you". Cheers bud.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:10 AM
-2

Please quote the exemption. I will try to look for it but I have read that thing twenty times. I've had to repeat it and copy it to every useless bag of mostly water that has tried to troll me before you. They failed as well.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 12:53 AM
-2

That was a general statement about people accusing another of rape, not of this specific instance. It was a demonstration of how a double-edged sword has been formed. You can't question the girl, and you can't implicate the boy. Who when someone gets raped, WHO IS GOING TO FUCKING JAIL??? If you want to run circles around this specific case some more, though, sure. Let's do it. First, since I didn't use the word "raped" I could have meant anything. It's also the case that since she is a minor, t…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 12:42 AM
-1

I read the law in Hong Kong. The law is actually fair in this case it seems, if worded a bit clumsily. Possible translation issues. Provisions exist that would penalize both genders. the only thing that Hong Kong law does not protect is adult men assaulted by women. Everything else is covered. Including children of both genders, and including homosexuals. Because they're so weird, right? Oh, and just because your nine year old knows how to call the police, doesn't mean that America's panic-stric…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 12:28 AM
-1

There are two of them, stupid. One can manually restrain her while the other takes over. I'm not sure if you're very silly or very fortunate that you didn't think of that.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 12:15 AM
-1

Fantastic that you assume they're prejudices. Not a trust issue. I'm just an immature piece of shit. Also, funny that you placed yourself in that same group by saying "people my age". And the way you STARTED speaking to me, young lady, you have nothing to say about maturity. Piss right off.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:50 PM
-2

Chance. Just the way the cards were played. The more you start trying to control numbers in that way, the more you should be seeing that those numbers aren't yours to screw with. Those numbers belong to nature and nature REALLY doesn't need your help making everything work.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:34 PM
-6

If you are representative of a 16 year old, I'm better off without the interaction at all. Byyyye.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:16 PM
-2

"Having fun" is not an emotional state. It's a complex social interaction that can involve pleasure, relaxation, excitement, lust, hunger, and/or pride. It's multifaceted and more complex than you see at first glance. And while it is not common at all among species on Earth, it is notable among some of the more social animals, like wolves, foxes and beavers. And I'm not going to comment on the pleasure of sex because I don't find pleasure in it. I lost that a long time ago.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:06 PM
-1

Wow. The fact that you missed it in my post is made only funnier by the fact that you copied and pasted it like a doofus. "They also created a provision in Section 122 that states that any person having sex with a minor under 13 can serve time." That means that the girl, if proven that she was a fully "consenting" participant, that she would be in the same position as the boys. Something I said like five times by now. So, no. I can't defend illegal consensual sex between minors only being troubl…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:55 PM
-1

You're assuming a lot out of this girl. How do you know the girl wasn't assaulted? How do you know she knew she should go to a police station or a hospital? How do you know she even knew where one was?
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:43 PM
-2

Can you quote where I said the girl claimed to have been raped? If not, your question is wholly irrelevant. I said I don't believe she gave informed consent. That's "I think they raped her".
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:32 PM
-1

Nice to know you haven't lost your penchant for spinning a mountain out of a molehill. I consider sex to be intimate and special and worth more than a frivolous pop of the cock into a random hole, and I'm called backwards. That's fine. I won't let you shame me for believing something.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:22 PM
0

I'm not even going to bother replying to you because you're not even reading my replies, or you'd know you're talking about of your stupid ass by now. You're acting like this is the first time a minor has done something heinous. This isn't even the first time a young boy has sexually assault a little girl. When I hear about little girls committing the same crime, I'll change my view accordingly. My world view comes from my view of the fucking WORLD, dude. Not only can I not see every little thin…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:12 PM
-1

Not opposed to sex ed. I think we are pushing our kids into sexual education too early. I don't think sex is terrible for consenting adults to do together. I do have a problem when it's one person doing it to someone else. That worries me when people word it like that. As if one person is just using the other one like a talking sex toy. And I don't think kids can't handle the existence of gays. You try explaining shit to a six year old. I can't even explain to my niece how the fucking toaster wo…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:01 PM
-4

I only need one set of arguments. It's a personal belief, based on personal experiences and observations of the environment I live in. Maybe you need to stop judging me for how I regard sex. Maybe I'm not as cavalier about sex as you are because of something other than your belief that I'm just some kind of idiot. But I guess I shouldn't expect you to give a shit, so I'm done with you too. I hope you enjoy all your mature sex. I hope it doesn't go bad for you.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:51 PM
-1

Wow. I didn't even need to be here for you to spin up these crazy stories. You should write a fucking novel or something. We'd hate all the characters, but hey - stick to what you're good at, right? Let's see, where to start. No. I don't eat the bare minimum, because eating lots of good food with a little indulgence is good for the mind, body and soul. Also, I work on minimum wage. I don't know how fancy you think I'm eating here. Also, it's okay to enjoy food. Just don't be a fucking uncontroll…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:41 PM
-1

I very much did look at it. I also looked at the 2011 case of the 13 year old boy who attacked and raped a 5 year old girl in a Hong Kong hospital. They couldn't convict the boy of the crime because he was under 14 and technically couldn't be found guilty. They revised the law to allow boys between 10 and 14 to be assessed for comprehension of their actions. They also created a provision in Section 122 that states that any person having sex with a minor under 13 can serve time. So if they decide…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:18 PM
-1

Your logic is flawed. If I ask to borrow your pencil, I don't have to have you acquire my permission to loan me your pencil. I'm asking for something, I am exempt from consent. Only you need to provide the consent. And since there were two boys and one girl, how truly likely do you believe it is that the girl (the youngest of the trio) started twirling her pigtails asking if they wanted to play "show me yours"? Just because what I happen to believe based on the information currently available th…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:08 PM
-7

Now you're just being fucked up, dude. Someone instigating sex is not a consent factor. If I was to approach a woman and proposition her, I would not have to reaffirm my consent to have sex. I did that when I fucking asked her if she wants "to get outta here". This is just the most frightening thread I've seen on Reddit.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 08:53 PM
-1

So I'm not allowed to have standards? Just because they differ from yours? I live in a country where the legal age is 16. But I'm not tempted by a 16 year old girl. I don't find a woman that looks under 18 to be sexually appealing. And having been in that age range, I can tell you that among myself and my peers, there wasn't an ounce of maturity to spread on a piece of toast. So, you can toss that crap. If I had it my way, the consent age would be 18. But I'm not in charge. You're welcome. -1 Yo…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 08:41 PM
-5

We've been horrible to each other throughout all of human history. We've come close to wiping ourselves off the Earth more than once. We fight over empty fields and tracts of water. Are you actually going to use ancient cultures that thought the sun and moon were gods clashing for eternity, as your metric for how young people should having sex? Are you nuts? Also, when a curious young girl takes that explanation, and adds, "Will they have a little baby like you did?" And then starts badgering yo…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 08:08 PM
-9

Way to make it personal. Also, I'd love to see the statement where I said that anyone under 16 is statistically incapable of making decisions. What I said was, that 18 is a sufficient number to approximate, based on core human biology, when a body is sufficiently ready, in conjunction with the mental and emotional preparedness for something like sex. I fail to see how that's bigoted. So, please go ahead and explain why you think sex ed is irrelevant, and what the hell kind of point you're trying…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 08:00 PM
-1

Nature doesn't reward animals, Biology configures the sex organs of viviparous animals to encourage stimulation during coitus. Basically, it tingles and feels good so that we'll move around until ejaculation. It just so happens that it doesn't take a lot of preparation to have sex, so it's an easy way to feel pleasure. That doesn't mean kids should be having sex the moment they feel their sex organs being "fun".
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:55 PM
-3

Under Section 122 of the Hong Kong Crime Ordinance, a person under the age of 16 cannot, in law, give any consent which would prevent an act being an assault for the purposes of indecent assault. This means that if it somehow comes out that she coerced both of them into having sex with her, she would face two counts of indecent assault. The boys would still face child porn and indecency charges for filming the sex and doing it in a stairwell at an apartment complex.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:49 PM
-7

We can't postulate that the victim is lying, even if evidence shows they are. And on the same coin, we can't theorize that the defendant is guilty either, even if - again - evidence shows they are? You're dividing by zero here, dude.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:46 PM
-3

No. Hong Kong law clearly states that the age of consent for all heterosexuals, and homosexual males is 16. Age of consent only fails to exist for homosexual females. You Can Read It Right Here They affirm it everywhere else I've looked.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:42 PM
-9

Yeah, sucks when people assume shit you DIDN'T SAY, DOESN'T IT. This means we can stop talking now. Buh bye.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:40 PM
-10

How many times do I have to plaster the words "11 YEAR OLD GIRL" before someone wakes up? This isn't about sex being awful and filthy. It's about TWO PEOPLE TAKING TURNS ON A CHILD. No, they don't have to prove they're not rapists, genius. That would defy the Burden of Proof, which is on the accuser. The state would have to prove that the girl was nonconsenting or unable to consent. Are you even thinking before you type? You're telling me that two boys tag-teaming one girl is SO OBVIOUSLY consen…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:39 PM
-4

I'll revise my position when I'm good and bloody ready to revise it. It really doesn't change the fact that Hong Kong law kinda says anyone having sex with a girl under the age of 13 can spend a nice long time in prison. It also says that males between 10 and 14 need to be assessed to determine if their actions were intentional or simply mischievous. The article you linked also happened to quote that Hong Kong authorities just don't jail children. So, until the "so far" and the "in the future" a…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:32 PM
-5

Well, here is Hong Kong's Consent Guidelines where you'll see that consent age is not specified to a gender. In Hong Kong, you are a minor unable to give legal consent for sexual activity until 16. They do provise that the age 16 also applies to gay males, but that no consent age exists for gay females. And these laws are not entirely old or outdated either. In 2011, a 13 year old boy went into a hospital and raped a 5 year old girl in Hong Kong. They could not convict the boy for the attack, se…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:15 PM
-11

But you're asserting that it's safe to allow someone over the age of 18 (potentially much older) to engage in sex with someone under 18. See, I'm really digging to find out where you're trying to go with this. I've made my point pretty clear. Multiple times. Child molesters aren't going to magically go away when you remove the consent age. It's not like alcohol where if you get the kid drunk at 12 he will never want to do it at 19. Maybe it's presumptuous to assume that a minor is a victim. But …
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:02 PM
-14

Go you, misquoting me again. Sex was DESIGNED for procreation. Because NATURE... still with me? DOESN'T HAVE FUN. Nature is a system of organisms, nothing more. Anything we do sexually that can't be intended to produce children, is a leisure. It's NOT MANDATORY that we give in to every impulse. And again, I never said people couldn't have sex for fun. I don't know why all of Reddit is determined to shove words into my mouth. You are being presumptuous and dangerously ignorant. Look at the teen p…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 06:54 PM
-15

"Two boys... were allegedly caught having sex with an 11-year-old girl" was my tip off. If the girl was in on it, they would have said "two boys and a girl were caught having sex". And I think I did mention a few times that it was something I believed based on the available evidence. I also said that if further evidence implicates the girl, that appropriate actions should follow for her as well Reading is more than simply comprehending individual words, son.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 06:22 PM
-5

Your entire argument is founded on the perceived lack of evidence that the boys were the aggressors. I refer you again to the article where it CLEARLY states that there's CCTV footage, a cell phone with video TAKEN BY THE TWO BOYS and witnesses in the security guards themselves. Even if you throw out the guards, video doesn't lie. So really, all you can say is that there is doubt as to whether the girl was not consenting. And like most places in the world, you can't arrest someone without eviden…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 06:16 PM
-15

I'm puritanical because I think 11 years old is too young to have sex? ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? If both partners are consenting and underage, they should still be punished for stupidity. This conversation is frankly horrifying by now. How many people are out there that just want kids fucking? This is gross.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:57 PM
-15

Wow. I just can't get a break. Do you people ever just fucking read what someone says and NOT assume a whole pile of shit around it? Did I say adults should be banned from sex? Do sterile, older and gay people have problems making informed decisions? Did they complete puberty? If so, then go suck on a hose, because this strawman crap is getting really boring.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:54 PM
-13

Are you suggesting that 18 is too high an age or are you suggesting that a consent age is impractical? Because I'd rather have an impractical consent age and just have kids deal with it, because really. They're kids. They're not allowed to do anything by themselves anyway. They have to wait until 16 to get a license (and that's only if Mom and Dad let them), 19 to drink (where I am from) and smoke, and 18 to appear naked on film for entertainment. 16 is also the age in Canada where consent becom…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:52 PM
-20

You're an idiot. You're a fucking idiot. AN ASSAILANT DOES NOT FALL UNDER CONSENT LAW. Being 11 and raping another 11 year old DOESNT MAKE YOU INNOCENT AND DOESNT MAKE HER GUILTY. Goddammit you're thick.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:45 PM
1

Rape is a sexual assault. Jerking off on someone is a sexual assault. C'mon man. I don't like assuming people are idiots, so let's not act like it, okay?
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:39 PM
-13

Wow. Way to fail at understanding stuff. The consent age isn't to keep two teens from having sex. It's to keep a 50 year old from coercing a 12 year old into pulling her pants down in his car. It's to keep a math teacher from riding her students in exchange for grades. I won't even bother addressing the rest of the insulting shit you babbled off, because frankly this entire thread is getting beneath me.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:38 PM
-14

You're missing the fact that the security guards saw the boys in the stairwell giving it to her, on the cameras. And they had access to the cell phone video of them taking turns with her. I am absolutely certain that, if there are consent laws for both genders, that they viewed the footage to determine if the girl was a willing participant, or if she was coerced, misled, confused, or flatout assaulted. We're not talking about American cops investigating a woman being attacked in an empty park he…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:35 PM
-14

She didn't clamour anything. Security guards SAW the boys railing her on a security camera in the stairwell. The two boys took turns filming the other giving her the business. The video is RIGHT THERE. They literally had access to it BEFORE arresting the kids. I am morally opposed to calling out victim-shaming but I'm sorry. I can't side with you on this. And for you to call her a promiscuous slutty 11 year old girl is frankly very presumptuous, since you have nothing to back that up. And just h…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:31 PM
1

Eh. Took some test in college to help with a study. It might not be exactly the same (it was six years ago) but I doubt I'd gotten too much dumber than when I checked. When I was a wee lad, I had my first gifted exam. They gauged me at a 140 and offered me a seat at a new school for gifted kids. I stood out badly enough. I was terrified (by then I was being bullied and beaten daily) that the new school would be worse, that they'd all be smarter than me and that I'd be the retard they beat up ins…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:26 PM
-15

I'm not opposed to sex education. But impromptu sex ed for six year olds, to accommodate the explanation why Mrs Beckett from first grade and the gym teacher Mrs Thompson are holding hands. Kids aren't pre-programmed with how to handle uncommon situations (and since homosexuals account for approximately 10% of western populations, seeing a gay couple together is less common than TV wants us to believe), so we have to explain it to them. And that means figuring out how to explain sex to a six yea…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:23 PM
-11

I fail to see how sexual assault is a double standard. And no, playing doctor isn't a euphemism until you're an adult and playing make-believe is a sign of psychosis. Then you put on rubber gloves and poke each other in the bottom. But I digress. You said "children should be waiting until [they're] old enough to understand" but you don't seem to be able to put your foot down on what you feel is the age we can write down in the law books. What age do you feel is appropriate for a youth to have se…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:14 PM
-26

Canadian, and I disapprove of titty bars altogether. Close 'em. And sex is something intimate you have with someone you trust. Not something you do to pass time. Not something you do for sport. And not something you trade for things and favours. It's supposed to mean something between the participants. Call it crazy if you want to, but pair bonding does exist in humans having penetrative sex that some creatures on our planet don't enjoy because they fertilize outside the body (like fish). The pa…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:10 PM
-23

We don't know it was consensual, bud. That's the problem. Article is very vague, and only confirms that the cell video and CCTV footage show the boys having sex with the girl. It doesn't say that the girl was willing to participate.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:54 PM
-25

The wording of the article leads me to believe that she was not a willing partner, no. The fact that security guards saw the incident on a CCTV camera, and the two boys were filming one another, while the girl was just... there and getting schlupped by both of them one after another... yeah, no. No, at this time I have to say looks like the boys made a nice big fat mistake that they'll have trouble taking back. Maybe if some evidence arises that implies that all three were consenting to it, I'll…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:45 PM
-28

A fruitful reply if I've ever seen one. But hey! Maybe that was a factor in me deciding to discontinue my pursuit of sex. I wasn't blown away by what I did get, and I would imagine that emotional trauma has a way of making someone less mature about it, or ready to ever go again. We've all got to be too stupid for something.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:38 PM
-20

We're living a loooong time now. More centenarians than ever. Some of them are pretty kinky in their old age too. I really wouldn't be bothered if the universal age of consent is 20. It's not like we're making masturbation illegal, Christ.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:35 PM
-15

Now you're going to extremes. Playing Doctor is a child's game, but are you thinking that kids playing doctor are fondling each other or getting naked? If so, WHO WERE YOU PLAYING DOCTOR WITH AS A KID??? I played make-believe games with my siblings, so maybe I just have a cleaner mind than you. Children shouldn't be having sex, with anyone. Period. Adults or other children. Why is this even a discussion? I'm getting the fuck outta here before someone says something that scares the hell out of me…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:33 PM
-58

What's so dangerous about waiting an extra two years? Sex isn't going anywhere. It's not like the ONLY time it'll happen or be any good is when you're under 16. Why are we in such a hurry to sexualize children? Can they not just be innocent? Play with a stick, go bicycling, join a junior baseball team, build model rockets with dad in the yard? First it was teaching them about sex young so that we can explain to them about gay marriage, because a four year old being told at school that girls marr…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:14 PM
-20

In my experience, 18 is acceptable. If the government and law can trust you to pick a national leader, it's good enough to trust you to at least try to make an informed decision about sex. It's not perfect, but what is. You can't just lift consent laws and just hope that everyone stays calm. Also, 18 is the age by which most youths have completed puberty, meaning they should be fully sexually developed. And I don't agree with close-in-age exceptions because I certainly wouldn't be happy with the…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:05 PM
-41

Um... did you read the article? It doesn't mention anything about the girl being a willing partner. Sorry man, I respect consent laws. Especially with an 11 year old girl. "There's nothing to suggest it wasn't consensual" except for the country's laws. Just how much could those boys really have needed to have sex that they ignored the law? If they're too young to know the law, they're too young to have sex. If they knew the law, they shouldn't have broken it. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:01 PM
-104

Sorry, nothing consensual about children having sex. If you're not 18, you're too stupid to have sex. Just look at EVERY UNDER 18 EVER. I was 17 once, and I was goddamn moron too. Of course, I wasn't "sharing a rape session with a best friend" moron. Send the boys to juvey and therapy, send the girl to a shrink. Send the boys' parents to serve in the military. Can't raise your kids well? Do something else useful instead.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:41 PM
0

Yeah, but I could get a high score?
/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:22 PM
0

I do. To everyone who asks how I'm doing.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:45 PM
1

But you can whack it on the head over and over until it stops moving.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:13 PM
-1

After ten years of being a doormat for feeeeeeeemales, I finally gave up and said good riddance to chivalry too. It's not like it was being appreciated by anyone.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:12 PM
0

I can do both. I have depression, so I could probably do them at the same time. 8AM Wake up. 915AM Out of Bed. 1045AM Shower 1130AM Lunch 1215PM Misery 420PM Bong 530PM Fix World 540PM Misery 550PM Ganja 600PM Dinner 700PM ???? 800PM Celebrity Game Night is on. 1000PM Possible pass out. Done.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:09 PM
0

I really like the Hoff-Summ. She has a very comforting tone when she speaks, she doesn't pose things aggressively or judgmentally. It's kinda like being told about feminism by Mom before your first girlfriend. I actually kinda wish my mother had warned me that women were... well, what they turned out to be, for me.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:04 PM
1

I've never seen a rights activism sub that was frankly this open minded. Tell ya what though. I was banned from the Feminism sub after my first comment. Either they have Man Police there or I've gotten offending feminists down to a science.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 12:45 PM
0

Wow. I'm so shocked that the New York Post - one of the least reputable papers in the toughest city in America - would be dismissive about an old creep who got famous eating tasteless sandwiches getting extra meat in his buns. (Hashtag-sarcasm.) While I can't say I feel reeeeeeeeally bad for Jared, I do have to object to the rape joke being gigantic fucking block letters dominating the page. I guess "Enjoy the Foot-long in Jail" at 14pt font just wouldn't have had the same impact.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 12:19 PM
0

Who is she claiming raped her?
/r/MensRights24/08/15 12:15 PM
0

One up ya, bud. Don't ever go anywhere with a woman alone. Ever. At all. Make sure thousands of people can see you at all times. Don't take her home, don't walk her to her door. Just dump her in a cab from the club or the restaurant and let the driver handle the gallantries. Not worth the risk.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 12:13 PM
0

What makes me the angriest about this article is that even though evidence exists proving his innocence, the cops are taking it to trial anyway... because they don't want to lose face? How stupid are they going to look when all the trial witnesses get up there and retract everything before the jury? When the CCTV footage is screened for them? When the victim herself apologizes to everyone for the confusion? Why isn't the accident victim going on TV and retracting the police claim?
/r/MensRights24/08/15 12:11 PM
1

Thanks for thinking so. I'm relieved I'm not actually a tender little flower that can't handle it. At first I was amused by the irony of it all, but now I'm just kind of annoyed, because this is exactly the kind of ignorance that makes it so hard for me to take the feminist movement seriously, which in turn is the reason talking to women is so grievously unappealing to me. (Obligatory "exceptions to every rule" provision behind glass. In case of butthurt, break glass.)
/r/MensRights24/08/15 12:02 PM
-1

Aw, dude. That's bullshit. Considering guys like us could probably fix the gender issue in like 15 minutes. If only the world would just shut up and listen to the smart people for bit.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:57 AM
1

My mother asks me at Christmas every year why I'm single in my thirties. I don't have it in me to sit her down and explain the difference between finding women unsuitable long term mates, and finding men attractive. So I just tell her "I'm workin' on it". Hopefully she goes senile before she realizes I'm not giving her any grandkids.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:56 AM
167

The look on his face was heartbreaking. He was just drained, in a trance. I've been there. It's called depression, and the last thing you need is to be called "fucking scum" by a total stranger who is judging you because of your gender. I hope he's okay.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:40 AM
-5

I guess we're just to supposed to thank our lucky stars that women aren't the rapey ones. Frankly, I'd rather have unwanted vagina than prison time or life of hell for something I didn't do.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:37 AM
-2

The cheating men and women on that website have no one but themselves to blame. It's no different than being caught by the spouse sneaking to a motel off the turnpike. You got busted because someone cared more about the person you were cheating on that you did, asshole. Go get yourself a new wife.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:22 AM
0

You're not exactly an optimist, are ya.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:17 AM
6

It's getting better, because I contacted the subreddit admins and this will make you laugh. I might go to the big guys about it myself. Transcript time! --Me, to the Mod: "I am very lost in the debating rules because at the top, it says: "Criticism of feminist concepts/organizations/persons is welcomed if it meets the following criteria:" And then after a couple of items on the list, it has this criterion: "...presentation of relevant data must not be biased against the feminist position (i.e. t…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:12 AM
1

Tell her that rape is not defined by penetrative sex. It is an act of a sexual nature wherein one of the participants is not willing but forced to take part. Jerking off on someone is rape.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:41 AM
-2

If I wanted to know what a woman felt, I'd have someone kick me in the groin so hard that I pass blood and spend a week acting like a fussy bitch. Luckily, I don't have an actual woman in my life so I don't hate myself that badly.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 08:36 AM
4

Statistically, a few might. Most wouldn't be interested. Frankly, the less women know about why I don't trust them, the better. I like to keep it simple.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter