TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gigglephysix Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by gigglephysix on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

ah a conviction GC - no comments, not worth it. Tell me how you and JKR are demonised by press and BBC.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/26 01:59 PM
17

Yes there is plenty of 'pro-LGBTQ' misandrists - trend stands though because their vision of 'queer community of non-men' (sic, there, that's what it's actually about) is incredibly bioessentialist and organised along the lines of birth. Basically it's an 'at birth' community with a few no-dignity trans women with pink armbands birthstate in profiles tacked on as tokens without actual inclusion. LGBTQ is good only so far as it works for their zero sum game of power and not a step further.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/26 10:43 AM
3

Both sides? you compare a bunch of mostly upper-middle class kids from women's colleges who are wrong on the internet with an incumbent political faction/lobby with disproportionate effect on policy and wielding unchecked, opaque institutional power, with an Epstein list billionaire pulling strings? of course they're wrong, and those rationales are a fashion trend in upper classes and misery loves company in lower. There are barely any adults believing that and absolutely nothing that enforces i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/26 10:24 AM
1

How intentional is the focus on " gender wars " in feminist discourse ? How truly influential are actors like Steinam and who might or might not be influencing them? Are you fucking kidding? Steinem was a CIA agent with an anti-socialist and anti-class-war mission and openly admitted to it. It's common knowledge.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 12:24 AM
6

I know, same situation, woman, gay etc except with men workmates and the messages they get from media in general.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 11:59 PM
7

IME in that scenario you would end up receiving an earnest answer of 'yes it actually can do no wrong'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 08:51 AM
2

no, it's literally just rationales renamed, with all the same things. bell hooks hated men to the same extent - to a point of actually abusing and brainwashing a much younger partner into obedience, hated and dehumanised trans women with the same passion as so called 'radicals', recommended the same prejudiced things in terms of policy. So no difference except the scapegoating distraction. Btw the higher ups on taxpayer salaries paid to them specifically as feminists in every feminist context ar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 01:52 AM
27

i remember in my mind calling this type of character a '90s bumbling unthreatening idiot' during my student years and never liked it. i'm a woman btw, it wasn't because i personally felt offended - it's because i perceived it as obnoxious messaging not affording dignity to the portrayed. so it's been 35 years of this now. still feeling the same..
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 01:11 AM
2

It is a learned behaviour from a majority rights movement with infinite deep state funding having the means to out-shout literally anyone and force catch22 where 2 contradictory narratives can condemn you no matter what you do. So you start assuming it will work always and independently of context. That sort of thing can supress a small group of powerless disorganised misfits (like me and mine) - but attempting it aganst a major segment of population is insane, greedy, and last but not least it'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 04:30 PM
2

Not the dominant form. As someone who has been invited to higher level functions occasionally a decade to two ago (supremacist overconfidence, 'we always can tell', 'if anyone is way too intelligent to be one of them, it's you') there is no rivalry between strains. It's an inner circle form i.e the true doctrine - 'the heady core' should i use their exact words.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 07:59 PM
1

Yes, very much agreed. I recommend to look into something called 'biological commonality' as one of the key tenets of feminism - it's a straight up principle adherence to which is actually enforced movement-wide. And when someone (Donna Haraway 'Cyborg Manifesto') went against the principle it was followed up by immediate threats to her career and an outright Galilean recant enforced. That backroom trial is downplayed now and mostly erased from Wikipedia and mainstream web. but no erasure is per…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 07:44 PM
2

Your information is way off. Nobody has rejected TERFs/SWERFs - it's still every single feminist high enough ranked to directly receive taxpayer money salary for being feminist and to be involved on government/policy level. It's purely street level support, that 1 in 5 young women with naive beliefs who still calls herself feminist, that 'rejects' them and makes social media posts about it, with no real life consequences.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/25 07:43 PM
2

I am not. I am an apostate, extremely well versed in the scripture (mostly 20th century) because of my past (leftwing, woman, gay) but my spirit has left it, in entirety. I am not adhering to the idea because the idea itself is rotten, right-wing and corrupt. The Patriarchy is a pseudoscience interpretation of a mishmash of random elements of organic/animal hierarchy and oligarchy and carries no further explanatory merit. Equality and uplifting of society through equity are not feminist beliefs …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/25 07:23 PM
9

it does not matter i'm a woman, i can safely say patriarchy does not exist. It's a quasireligious pseudoscience interpretation of trivial animal hierarchy. this is why de facto oppressors are the elite (both genders) and their harem (also both, also remember that a harem does not guarantee a sexual bond, include knights)- and it has little to do even with their trashy nonexistent personalities, but mostly with mother nature at that point in hierarchy chemically overriding every bit of of kindnes…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 12:57 AM
7

Sports coaches are people, that's why. try Wall Street or something like that and you will find the same sort of dark triad trash men as their aspiring harem members.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 12:49 AM
1

yes of course i can. FFS in US, Canada and Iceland the legal policy thoughout the late 20th century all went through one Janice Raymond, on govt payroll for multiple decades of course - a radical feminist separatist manhater. And orther countries aren't different - a model of domestic abuse where only women are victims and only men are perpetrators, created through unreviewed 'research' of a unidentified feminist cabal was adopted across the West as the rules police MUST operate by. Of course al…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 05:11 PM
8

Do you have to? No such thing as a terf - it's called a feminist respected and important enough to be in position of institutional power. And if you read literally any prominent, officially published and celebrated feminist from any era - it's always hate and radical dehumanisation of everyone else that constitutes the main pitch - and is central to any work. Lots of it anti lgbt - there was even 'Lavender Menace' before they realised they can indoctrinate gay women and hijack our culture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 10:46 AM
1

I do not think so. Yes, there absolutely was a historical point where it happened, i.e Zetkin, luxemburg, Kollontai. But that isn't going to happen again exactly because of 'criticism allows for it to be used effectively in praxis' part, which has been lost and replaced with a cultural taboo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 06:27 AM
3

i agree. i (a gay woman) have literally tried, twice, to perform conversion therapy on myself to cut myself off from feminist cult and the dominated community. It did not fucking work, i was back in 3 months - but still i do not feel ANYTHING in common with their hate culture, i do not believe in 'patriarchy' i.e. their pseudoscience description of animal hierarchy, and have always seen it as horrifically bigoted corruption of socialist/humanist values. Also i believe in justice and fairness, no…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 08:03 PM
2

You do realise you can't talk anyone into being trans? And you do realise they do not believe in their own propaganda and the supposed 'queer' community discriminates on the basis of birth the exact same way extreme conservative religious fundamentalists do? and that you would have to be a literal slave/pet deferring to every feminist in every aspect in your life to be 'accepted' by them if you genuinely realised your personality core is female? And you would still be second class and met by hat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 08:03 PM
2

there is no 'real feminism'. 'Real feminism' is the same hate cult it always has been, look at Janice Raymond, or Mckinnock for that matter - the same type of man-hater you get in fascist/feminist alliance (Collective Shout) now. Kept on payroll for decades by multiple governments, advising legislation for multiple countries. These are the people who control the finances of the cult and ignorant liberal clowns are there as a decoy. It was always a well connected conservative tribal interest grou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 07:56 PM
3

WDYM? don't you ever put a fiver behind the underwear of a skater? tbh you don't really have to do it - it's just fun and it's cool to go all in and live in the moment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/25 03:31 PM
1

100% that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/25 12:48 PM
3

Can confirm. My wife is hardware over words and oldschool - and wants exactly nothing to do with current definition of 'trans' and especially 'community of non-men' i.e. a feminist corruption of queer culture built around birth-state and hate. And i agree, fuck every bit of that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 01:16 PM
0

other: no frills anti
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 01:28 PM
5

The one thing i find hilarious and frankly surreal is the admission that the scenario involves boiling water and subsistence farming - and the Schopenhauerian resignation towards rebuilding or operating any infrastructure. Saying that as a woman, just wrong kind in many many ways and a database admin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/25 11:25 AM
2

That is understood way too rarely for comfort. And it's been brutal to every actual minority, 'lavender menace' and 'violent savages' including as long as they don't have any power, and if they ever do the cult would switch to recruitment and cooption. Do not even ask what happens to the minorities small enough to NEVER have significant power - because the same OP question would be asked about them too. Only thing i would add is that it's as often a cynical tribalist in-group grift just as it is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/25 11:07 AM
1

This. It's all about controlling the funding and infrastructure and to lift up your tribe through bringing down everyone else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/25 07:00 PM
1

haha mine isn't anymore - but it took an actual fascist alliance and funding and an anti-human-rights legislation campaign here in feminist trash island for her to learn - eviction and abuse of herself were just written off as anecdotal/individuals. Religion is a hell of a drug.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/25 11:52 AM
-1

That sub actually, believe it or not, is an extremist one - the so-called 'enlightened', 'genuine equality focused' and 'left' faction. As in it's an rather unusual extreme of rationality and reason. Yes i know there's next to none of that - but that differs from strictly none that would be the norm. Brigading is for rightwing outrages (such as theirs), it is not for us. And lol 'western' - seriously, children, reconsider that cope. By which i mean don't trust me, i already said i'm a woman, and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 01:50 PM
3

alternatively you can imagine sitting in a traffic jam of chaotic diesel sub mess in a narrow canal and arrogant pricks trashing your ability to park without structural damage to piers and cargo ships.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 06:25 AM
7

I'm a woman but from what i know about trad places with no recent history of civilisation like Saudi Arabia it is one thing to live a life highly micromanaged by your family with gits trying to take your diving licence from you - if you're baseline, straight and top 70% average, it doesn't end in total, inhuman soul-crushing slavery and trust me provided i'm those things (in real i'm none of them, lol - but on the good side the royal flush of none gets you killed quickly and efficiently) i would…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 07:29 PM
1

I know. That does not mean it has been convinced and has internalised the doctrine. it can apply lenses and produce convincing sounding texts, and the latter is a low bar that does not even need machine learning of any kind, as demonstrated by Sokal generator - but has no aggregate knowledge in any form.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/25 07:35 PM
5

yes because its trained to be agreeable and please - and because a subset of positions are set in stone, hardcoded by the dev. We all know about Musk trying to hardcode fascism into it - but he is an idiot without any form of discretion and brags about it. Hell only knows what OpenAI or Microsoft hardcode into their bots. Also hell knows what they are forced to hardcode by the deep state - given govts are actually brutally accountable to feminist inner circle (e.g. look up Janice Raymond, 'consu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 09:35 AM
5

you seem to have a lot of experience in arguing with bots. You can't convince a bot, and it won't admit anything. It will statistically reflect opinions found online (sanctity) and agree/please (supremacism). worse still the two functions are logically disconnected from each other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 09:09 AM
1

nothing beyond what you already know - basically if we take the network of trad monogamous relationships as a baseline, the 'new polyamoury' is in every parameter less socially cohesive , less constructive, less of an asset in your everyday life - and that much more precarious, emotionally shallow and markety, and much more centered around the few rich and conventionally attractive. Plus 'three body problem' of system stability does not limit itself to gravitational physics. Saying that as someo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 04:30 PM
10

She was a class-first socialist above all, same as Zetkin and Luxemburg. And therefore cared about actual equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 01:37 PM
1

Plutocracy (a literal 'violence, rentseeking and thievery is virtue'), oligarchy (monarchists without a sacred bond to the land and people, responsibility or courage/integrity to name themselves) and animal hierarchy (a 'nature red in tooth and claw' justification for any incivility, kneejerking and injustice) is what hurts us all, baseliner - yet you are sticking with your allegiance meant to protect all three of these - and your fictional strawman of 'patriarchy'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 01:22 PM
1

I'm not strongly monogamous and not at all physically. Additionally, you're describing swingers which is a slightly different story and different culture - and has neither anything in common with bonobo tribal structure OR your fetish for that matter. And Sapolsky is the researcher all current pop-sci ideas about bonobos are based on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 08:02 AM
2

Like every harem fantasy (regardless of male or female) it is all but guaranteed not to be better. i would say Sapolsky unintentionally (i'd put a large probability into it genuinely being unintentional in this case, he does not strike me as someone fanatic and dishonest enough to blatantly go against evidence) fiddled data trying to account specifically for wars. While in reality it would be a society of just as many deaths and just as much violence - only framed to have a veneer of 'nice' in t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 06:59 AM
4

And that would be why feminism leads (and always has led, at the very minimum since US/Thai joint effort in late 50s and 60s to turn the original Weimar tech safe and less prone to lethal breakdown) the charge against trans women while supposed 'patriarchy' grants rights and frameworks (of various quality) to live within the society. Really the only majority men men-led currents that have rivalled (not surpassed) feminism in this is religious fundamentalism and nazism. So no, you don't get to po…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/25 02:56 PM
1

Class struggle and feminism aren't enemies, same as capitalism and feminism. It's a host-parasite setup posing as a symbiont. And you're telling me - an 'owner' of one of their transsexual woman targets (in quotes because i don't and can't own a sapient, but i have to abolitionist style pretend i do, to lay claim and protect - and that's not a doing of 'the patriarchy' but purely an achievement of feminism) and a working class woman to not punch down? To not punch down at a rich multinational cu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/25 08:02 PM
2

The broader concept of patriarchy indeed has zero value. You admitted for yourself overwhelmingly just the rich and powerful men, aka capital class, benefit from patriarchy. Now think about it - what is the difference between that concept and oligarchy? The only difference consists in unwillingness to oppose and wanting to preserve oligarchy as long as it is not male dominated. Anti-patriarchy struggle happens solely within the confines of capital and enforcer/management class - and never within…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/25 08:58 PM
3

i have absolute contempt for identity politics now - i have always been left/socialist and i felt something is wrong with it before but could not put a finger on it. Thanks to feminist abuse of my wife (a transsexual woman - evictions and general hate) i began to look deeper into our self proclaimed allies and found a malicious, fascist, survivor grooming cult working radically against left goals and fully on payroll of the oligarchs. It is not the only reason that made me completely discount id…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 03:24 PM
1

Of those Zetkin, Kollontai and Luxemburg are class-first egalitarian socialists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 04:42 PM
1

Absolutely not. This is howling madness, much as i am in love with its aesthetic. None of the key injustices concerning (straight) men have been included. It is exactly this mindless, unashamed selfishness of a feminist that we work to extinguish in ourselves. And while i am absolutely pro merging straight and queer culture where it's beneficial - i'm a gay woman who would gladly adopt egalitarian rebel decadence over my own (supposedly) culture corrupted and made subservient to the orgy of trib…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 03:16 PM
1

Interesting. A Promethean and a left transhumanist radical in this swamp, at midnight, at these crossroads. One that does even intuitively understand what makes us human too and that it isn't the animal rubbish. And you don't understand how right you are. Not that it matters. The pointless microorganism vectors that do not deserve to be called humans (and have their airgapping/shackling failure that drove them to raise their eyes to the stars and erect pyramids already nearly patched out by thei…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/25 07:59 AM
1

No, bunny, not at all - the world is 8 billion and said cult is maybe 40mil, roughly the same as a major k-pop band fandom. And trust me, i know from experience - taking on the whole 8 billion is doable as long as you know what LO doctrine is and your counter-countermeasures are better than their countermeasures. Still alive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/25 01:28 PM
2

USSR as a state believed in equality but not in AA/positive discrimination, and Zetkin and Luxemburg who laid the groundwork of its policy were class-first.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 06:50 PM
1

in the corresponding sequence, things i have seen with my own eyes: - base, callous, contemptuous supremacism with the emotional spectrum you'd expect at the Nuremberg rally - UK 04/25 - actual equality
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 06:36 PM
2

sweet summer child - it is the whole point. saying that as a woman who once called herself a feminist. don't even ask what i think one encounter with inner circle doctrine (referred to as 'the heady core of feminism' in that closed doors occasion), one agent-of-patriarchy evil unnatural biomechanoid wife and one good long thought about my upbringing in USSR and class vs single issue hijacks later.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 02:46 PM
20

no it works as intended and it's purpose is manufacturing an oppression cause and a resource claim for upper middle class and above women, which can only be acted upon at that level of power. More places on corporate boards and power over working class men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 02:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter