gimmealldapillz Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
80	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless	CMV	gimmealldapillz	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 04:03 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless Your focused on the act of sex itself and not on all the surrounding context that's involved. Primping and grooming and the confidence it takes to rock that skimpy black dress are all a part of women enjoying their bodies. This has nothing to do with n count really. How do you get to know them though? What are you looking for? How they act, character, etc	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 08:22 PM
1	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless What makes you think that? Body positivity is some keep driving force in casual sex for women? I mean come on. This is like some feminist blog hogwash lol. Right, but looking at 5 women in a line up, how do you know even close enough? Silly example. You don't. IRL you actually get to watch them especially if you date in your social circle. With OLD it's harder but you will still get to know them and their history before you commit	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 07:57 PM
0	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless How so? I think the point to single men (or maybe women too) is: avoid LTRing or marrying promiscuous people. That's it. There's 5x as many non promiscuous people around you can choose from.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 07:48 PM
0	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless Oh please. Common interpretation is what is clearly being discussed here. There's a consensus on most things.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 07:42 PM
2	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless LMAO no one is talking about hymens. Men don't want to LTR promiscuous women and prefer low n count ones. This stuff is rarely told to women FYI because it would offend the sluts. Not virgins. Just not sluts.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 07:41 PM
1	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless ... In theory sure. In practice... If you go out enough with a positive attitude because your love your body, you'll eventually meet a guy you want to have sex with. And then another and another... This is some funny fresh feel good BS. Thanks for this. Sure, I won't deny that. But you'll never be able to confirm her n-count, so how good is it at actually predicting these things? Aren't you better off using other, more observable measures? You just need to be close enough. Slut or not? >10 or < …	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 07:40 PM
0	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless Funny that you're telling me what to do in the meanwhile LOL. If you don't like it don't listen.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 07:39 PM
1	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless Maybe not, but there's a lot of secondary benefits that come with high n count - fun going out lifestyle, opportunities with attractive men, positive body image ect, that would offset the negative or neutral feelings about n-count. LOL @ that. You can do all of that and have a low n count. Sure, but a better and more accurate way of measuring how carefree/careless someone is would be to say, watch them dive a car. Plenty of virgins are also careless drivers. It's part of the things that makes th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 07:18 PM
2	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless Not by the men that women want to be with. A man who cares a rats ass about n-count (or virginity especially) is wildly off-putting to women unless they are religious or something. There is absolutely nothing that backs up this statement. It's just words. Unlike n count data and its negative associations. persona example: I know no religious men and no one wants to LTRs a slut or high n girl.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 07:17 PM
2	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless But why? To what end? Where is the benefit to women to do this? Better perceived reputation obviously. I told you this before. High n count is almost never viewed favorably. It's highly stigmatized. Low n count is highly preferred by most people. This isn't even a personal opinion.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 07:05 PM
1	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless It's an interesting point, but the data is for 30 year olds at the median. I don't think divorcees are moving the needles here.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 07:03 PM
2	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless No one thinks a high n count is a positive, though. Only neutral at best. Low n count is almost never viewed negatively, but often neutral or often positive. Hence, someone unable to keep a low n count sounds like they might be deficient in some way, including being a careless (carefree to the max) person which is not a good trait to most people, especially family oriented types.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 07:02 PM
2	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless It can have personal meaning and it can have actual (factual) meaning. There is lots of data about it. I'm questioning a different aspect though: people who say it is meaningless. Like completely meaningless. What it means isn't even the point.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:53 PM
4	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless It is also indicative of their inability to have a lower number of partners So true	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:45 PM
1	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless So you care about it enough to know it? I don’t know what you mean by the impacts being “universally applicable” because obviously the stats will not universally apply. Not everyone with high N has an STD, etc. not everyone with a low N is religious, etc. regardless, I don’t know many people who make calculated dating decisions based on broad statistics like what I’ve seen concerning n count. Most men who seem to be against high N women seem to eschew that because they find it gross, not because…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:44 PM
0	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless Why would someone not value things which can impact them positively or negatively? These impacts are universally applicable. No one is immune to STDs. No one is immune to emotional damage from breakups and divorce. Like being burned by fire.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:37 PM
1	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad362.pdf Page 29	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:34 PM
3	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless People say they don't care about n-count because it means nothing. I say it means plenty.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:33 PM
0	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless How about higher rates of STDs with high n count? Lower agreeableness scores with high n count? Lower happiness scores with high n count? Higher divorce rates in general with high n count? How is any of that subjective?	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:29 PM
3	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless All choices do not have the same meaning.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:28 PM
1	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless Not what people THINK. That's not fact, that's opinion. Hard numbers that say something positive or negative about n-count. Are you saying this doesn't exist?	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:18 PM
0	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless So there's not a hair of objective fact in this? Nothing that numbers can't show?	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:14 PM
2	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless OK so it DOES say something about them, just nothing positive or negative? Kinda like ice cream flavor preference?	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:08 PM
0	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless Let's not derail this to men and womens' education. How can n-count say nothing about a person so as to make it completely OK to ignore it?	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:04 PM
-2	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless She's easier or arguably has lower standards for her partners? Two women, same looks and personality roughtly. One is n count 2, other is n count 20. They both go out about the same, get hit on the same. One fucked 10x more guys.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:03 PM
2	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless This says that women with the highest education are more likely to be in the highest promiscuity group. (Note: the highest promiscuity group still has less super educated women than other women - this is mathematically un-falsifiable). We don't know the rest of the stats for the highest educated group, but the group's median partner count could be lower than no college. Just that it's filled with a group of super sluts. Cool link, thanks for it. Overall promiscuity is not measured like that thou…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 06:02 PM
4	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless The same way water stays wet. College isn't some magical slut maker, contrary to incel and RP beliefs (quite the opposite actually for many).	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 05:57 PM
6	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless LOL. Most people care about it. A quick Google search tells you this via this huge survey and it's probably full of sexually adventurous liberal people (condom company made it). Even they care. Welcome to reality. https://www.bustle.com/articles/97433-more-women-than-men-care-about-a-new-partners-sexual-history-says-new-study-and-over Not only do 36 percent of women want to know the intimate details of their partner’s sexual past, but women are also more likely to talk about their past partners.…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 05:55 PM
3	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless they enjoy sex Not really. This is # times sex, not n count. they have the ability to have a larger number of partners But someone with low n count could have CHOSEN not to have MORE partners.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 05:53 PM
0	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless At the very least, it says that this person is much more open to more sexual partners, which already validates my statement, "it means something."	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 05:52 PM
2	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless That's a directly opposite discussion, not the OP.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 05:45 PM
2	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless People care about things which are meaningful or important to them. Therefore not caring about n-count implicitly says that n-count is meaningless.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 05:44 PM
2	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless What makes you think MOST people have reasons to fudge their number?	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 05:29 PM
1	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless Probably true. If college education is at least somewhat related to intelligence then that is shown in sex partner data. College educated = less partners.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 05:14 PM
5	N-Count Cannot Be Meaningless t says something about a person but nothing positive or negative. Is let's say living in a commune positive or negative? How about being purposefully homeless and traveling around? How is this the same as choosing how many people you have sex with?? Anyway, no one thinks STDs are a positive. Or higher relationship/marriage risk. All of this is shown in data. This stuff is decidedly "negative."	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/19 05:13 PM