gimmealoose Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	32/f woman cheated on her husband, wants to keep the baby and looking for advice how to rob her husband No it isn’t. All you need is to pluck a couple hairs from the kid and a couple of your hairs. You send that off to a lab and they mail or email you the results. Super simple and not all that expensive.	/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen	08/08/20 06:35 PM
22	Female climate activists blocking the streets need to GET THE FUCK OUT THE WAY!! Person who can’t defend their position “declining” to explain. Shocker.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/10/19 09:19 PM
12	Female climate activists blocking the streets need to GET THE FUCK OUT THE WAY!! God, you sound like the worst.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/10/19 09:16 PM
2	Wtf I hate women even more nao... Even nominal consideration can support an enforceable contract. Even a promise to do something would be sufficient. The bargained for exchange doesn’t have to be equal.	/r/MGTOW	31/01/19 01:09 PM
1	What level are you boys? Level 1 here. Like it says, only level 0 is bad. For the record, common law marriage is only recognized in like 12 states. It isn’t typical, it’s the exception.	/r/MGTOW	25/01/19 08:07 PM
5	What are your thoughts on this? Violence or threatening violence is wrong. If someone cheats, you shouldn’t have put yourself in that position in the first place. And no need to involve strangers. Just move on and learn so you don’t let it happen again.	/r/MGTOW	11/01/19 11:43 PM
2	This is exactly why people avoid single mothers. Dating single moms is asking for trouble .bot necessary and a terrible idea. Stack your paper and date younger women with no children. It’s not hard and you don’t need to settle.	/r/MGTOW	11/01/19 03:11 AM
62	Apparently not wanting to look after a 20yr olds kid is pathetic Never date single moms. Never never never.	/r/MGTOW	03/01/19 01:52 PM
4	A True Story... I tested, she failed... So what? That has nothing to do with what you are talking about. You can’t be sued for not driving someone home from a shitty date. Full stop. That said, don’t pick up your dates. Nothing wrong with cutting a date short, but as a man if you pick someone up you should take them home. If you don’t want that responsibility, use separate transportation.	/r/MGTOW	03/01/19 01:46 PM
9	relationships sure are wonderful If you want to try to make that argument to a twelve person jury, be my guest. I wouldn’t. And I don’t see how you could argue the Castle doctrine applies. That doctrine varies widely from state to state. I don’t see how you could conclude it is a complete defense here without knowing where this occurred. This would be an easy case- for the prosecutor. Don’t shoot the messenger folks, I’m just telling it how it is.	/r/MGTOW	05/12/18 11:48 PM
21	relationships sure are wonderful Shoving her out the car (assault), driving away while she is partially out of the car (vehicular assault, negligent operation of motor vehicle, reckless endangerment). Probably others. Self-defense doesn’t allow you to do whatever you want. Unless she had a weapon, his response was not proportional. And those are just the criminal charges. She would have a pretty good civil case against him for any injuries, plus emotional damages. That’s the way the law works, folks. Edit: bring on the downvote…	/r/MGTOW	05/12/18 11:27 PM
3	yay tv show glorifying single mothers and muh "sexuality". of coz vagina is the centre theme in the trailer.... #TooFarGone #ImminentCollapse It was already renewed for a second season. Coming soon...	/r/MGTOW	04/12/18 06:51 AM
0	A worth reading article about Sheryl Sandberg, she projected herself above Facebook and now she cannot find a scapegoat for her own FAILURES, why ?? Because she is SURROUNDED BY YES MEN. Did you have to give that CIA linguistics officer a reach around for that juicy info, sweetheart? You’re a nutcase, pal. You give conservatives/republicans a bad name. Get out of my party stat. Not kidding. Fucking leave.	/r/MGTOW	28/11/18 06:48 AM
0	A worth reading article about Sheryl Sandberg, she projected herself above Facebook and now she cannot find a scapegoat for her own FAILURES, why ?? Because she is SURROUNDED BY YES MEN. No, I’m not going to check it out because I’m not paranoid and not into jumping at shadows. Wake up, bud. You aren’t nearly smart enough to understand “geopolitics and geostrategics” (whatever the hell that is). Even if you were (again, you aren’t), what makes you think you can have any effect on the dealings of nation-states and multinational corporations? You can’t little tumbleweed farmer. Here’s a tip: instead of punching above your intellectual weight, make some changes. Run for city counci…	/r/MGTOW	28/11/18 06:35 AM
-1	A worth reading article about Sheryl Sandberg, she projected herself above Facebook and now she cannot find a scapegoat for her own FAILURES, why ?? Because she is SURROUNDED BY YES MEN. Dude. Fist off, the law and politics are two very different things. You need to learn the difference. Who cares if they are liberal? The question is whether FB broke the law. It didn’t. Do we need to have a more detailed discussion about data privacy and governmental controls over user data? I think so. The EU is quickly moving in that direction. But, frankly those discussions are over your head. You need to do some serious homework and understand what you are actually outraged about. It’s clear…	/r/MGTOW	28/11/18 06:13 AM
1	A worth reading article about Sheryl Sandberg, she projected herself above Facebook and now she cannot find a scapegoat for her own FAILURES, why ?? Because she is SURROUNDED BY YES MEN. Quit posting links that having nothing to do with the issue at hand. These articles are irrelevant. Facebook didn’t sell user data to Cambridge Analytica. Full stop.	/r/MGTOW	28/11/18 05:52 AM
0	A worth reading article about Sheryl Sandberg, she projected herself above Facebook and now she cannot find a scapegoat for her own FAILURES, why ?? Because she is SURROUNDED BY YES MEN. Don’t see what that has to do with Facebook. Your statement that FB sold CA data is simply inaccurate. None of the links you are posting says otherwise. And so they did it with India, too. So what? What does that to do with anything?	/r/MGTOW	28/11/18 05:49 AM
1	A worth reading article about Sheryl Sandberg, she projected herself above Facebook and now she cannot find a scapegoat for her own FAILURES, why ?? Because she is SURROUNDED BY YES MEN. Not true. They didn’t sell it. Cambridge Analytica used a dummy quiz that asked users to consent to giving over their information before playing. There wasn’t any sale or theft. Every user agreed to give CA their data. Facebook screwed up by allowing CA to run that type of game on users, not for selling data. At least understand the facts before getting upset.	/r/MGTOW	27/11/18 02:58 PM
0	A worth reading article about Sheryl Sandberg, she projected herself above Facebook and now she cannot find a scapegoat for her own FAILURES, why ?? Because she is SURROUNDED BY YES MEN. They didn’t sell it. Cambridge Analytica used a dummy quiz that asked users to consent to giving over their information before playing. There wasn’t any sale or theft. Every user agreed to give CA their data. Facebook screwed up by allowing CA to run that type of game on users, it for selling data. At least understand the facts before getting upset.	/r/MGTOW	27/11/18 02:58 PM