I think it's less rare or weird than you think. We've been conditioned by patriarchal norms throughout history to follow that bs narrative that women aren't visually turned on because it benefits genetic losers/genetically inferior males, allowing them to control women's sexuality.
I didn't say universal. Some girls has never experienced any kind of physical attraction/arousal. That's not the point. The person I was responding said "Women don't get wet at the sight of a tall man". I simply corrected that assumption by saying that women do in fact, based on my (and others') experience. Not that it is literally universal/100% of women.
He's a bit on the short side (5'9") for me though. My omg so hot ideal would be a guy that has the same kind of high facial masculinity but taller. Someone like that looks like this: https://www.stormmanagement.com/media/18333/greg_kheel_339_jonathan_quipot_tablet.jpg
I note that several women are here describing more or less the same physiological signs and responses to sexual arousal. Yep, and some defensive or fragile dudes will STILL argue that there's no such thing as female arousal strictly based on visuals. The denial is just strong in some.
lol Yeah, South Park invented us women being physically turn on by hot looking males. Not sure why some dudes have some trouble accepting women are turn on (visually) by hot men...is it an ego protection thing because they can't illicit these "tingles" themselves?
Clit gets erect. Type of guys that provoke said reaction: best way I could describe it is a the Ian Sommerhalder look. Ideally around 6'1-6'2" height. Type "blue eyes, dark hair male model in google if you're (bi?) curious.