TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

givemegif Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by givemegif on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think these are generally two different groups of men you're seeing in trp. One group just wants to plate whores and aren't down to wait around for a girl to put out, or pay a higher price than any other man. The other camp is more conservative and idealistic, or blue pill, or just older and looking to settle down (or all three), and they want as pure a madonna as possible for an LTR or marriage. The blue pills want this 'cause they still believe in fairytales, the conservatives want it becaus…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 08:04 AM
1

Why is this being downvoted? It doesn't even take creativity. 2 cheap dates should be about 3-5 hours. Very reasonable goal.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 07:54 AM
3

It's cool if it's escalating to the second or third date and it's clear she's into you and wants to bang but just doesn't want to be seen as a slut. You can compromise a little. Maybe you make out and feel her up first date, blowjob second, bang third. Anything beyond 3 I wouldn't do, and not past 2 if she doesn't give you anything to work with.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 07:15 AM
2

It seems to me like the concept of "success" and "rich" will no longer exist. There will no longer be work for anyone to do, and if anything and everything you could want is provided for you, there is no "rich" either. I have a hard time believing the current ruling elite could let such a thing happen though. Imagine you've spent your life earning millions so you can bang tons of 10s. If there is no longer a hierarchy of wealth and power, there will be no way for betas or unattractive alphas to …
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 06:06 AM
21

This is all over the Jian Ghomeshi case in Canada as well. Many news articles discussing how the justice system "failed" the "victims" by assessing their behaviour after the alleged assaults (they all continued to contact him flirtatiously, one even sending nudes, and all lied about it in court). Tons of feminists asserting this BS that no behaviour is indicative of inconsistency or lying, and assuming men are guilty and have escaped justice because "women never lie", and then trying to get this…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 01:05 AM
1

Already took his soul too. Poor guy Edit: Wow, what a great audience. Not a South Park fan in the house eh?
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 11:21 AM
1

Are you another free man on the land?
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 08:27 AM
0

Your comments are false and/or simplistic. Socialist style policies have been found to create far better societies. Your concern is not with society though, you're not interested in forming a successful, flourishing society. You're only concerned with your own wealth. That's the real issue here, different goals. I'll be making $300K plus within 10 yrs (guaranteed, barring drastic changes to society), and I'm happy to pay a fair share of tax to create a thriving society. I'm not interested in liv…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 03:10 AM
0

Why do you think there is this dichotomy? Why not both? http://imgur.com/gallery/c7NJRa2 Education should be free, and arts degrees should be severely curtailed. Private arts colleges are a huge scam and should not be accredited. There should only be a very limited number of seats in public institutions for arts degrees, and STEM seats should be expanded.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/16 01:21 AM
1

Is that really libertarian? I thought the guy was advocating for "free men on the land" which is retarded. It's basically anarchy.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/16 01:12 AM
1

Because you are signing a social contract to use the same roads and hospitals and schools. Paying for education REDUCES the number of welfare supporters. Just about every conservative program has been an utter failure, resulting in the opposite outcome desired. Want less abortions? Advocate for the removal of sex-ed in schools.... uhh that didn't work did it? Want less people on welfare? Defund public schools.... uhh that didn't work out did it? Want less drug use? Make a war on drugs, criminali…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/16 01:04 AM
0

Are you saying you agree with bank bailouts and trickle-down economics? I think you have a different definition of socialism than me. You seem to think it's communism, when it's really just universal healthcare, education, and infrastructure with progressive taxation. I watched the Molyneux video you spammed in 10 comments as well, and while I like Molyneux, that video seems very irrational. He actually shows in all his data that Scandinavian countries and a few other western ones like switzerla…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/16 12:51 AM
1

Fair question, I did comment on another thread, but I've been a trp lurker for a couple years and always avoided creating a reddit account or commenting, but felt particularly compelled to comment because it's an issue I feel is strongly misrepresented by half of the guys here. I also just created this account to request a gif be made for a social purpose, and having this account already signed in... it was just convenient to comment. I've spent too much time commenting on this thread already th…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/16 12:47 AM
3

It would be solid if he wasn't cutting and pasting this response in every thread. I read it once, it was enough to get his take on marxism. I get it. Say something new or particularly relevant to this thread.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 09:48 AM
1

Yes, capitalism without government interference is great in theory. But typically and conveniently you forget or are ignorant of the fact that blind self interest inevitably leads to market failure. Therefore, regulation is always necessary. Much of this regulation can be considered "socialism", but is not remotely the same as communism. It's about striking the right balance of income inequality where people can work hard to succeed and reap those rewards, creating a hierarchy that people work t…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 09:23 AM
1

Your comment shows a complete lack of understanding of current and proposed taxation plans. First, you would only be paying 35% (in your example) on the money you earn beyond 100K. Second, I believe Bernie is talking about raising taxes primarily on people making 200k+, 500k+, 1M, 1B, etc, not middle class people 50-150K. Maybe some very marginal increase on the middle class but that would be compensated for with cheaper healthcare and other benefits.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 09:13 AM
0

This is actually the worst argument in all of conservatism. Please give your head a shake. You're essentially endorsing trickle-down economics. This is a completely failed theory.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 08:40 AM
0

Yes, poke at my exaggerations because you have no counter argument. Of course the middle class exists, but is shrinking faster and faster. Of course it's POSSIBLE to get rich, but that's like saying "Hey, I could totally go win the powerball and be a billionaire tomorrow". Yes, more accurately, the odds are stacked against people now in ways unseen by the previous few generations. No, the money isn't being stolen from rich people. It's being returned to it's rightful owner, from whom it was orig…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 08:19 AM
0

I'm not a leftist by any stretch of the imagination. I'm a cultural libertarian and a fiscal liberal. I shouldn't have jumped to the insult, but your use of that video was either completely senseless, or dishonest. Take your pick. As for the theoretical argument you and the interviewer are making, it's fucking retarded. You're saying that you're "freemen on the land", and that shit will never fly.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 08:15 AM
1

They are actually equal and prosperous citizens there. America is the feudal land full of serfs. This is fucking blatantly, patently obvious. It is borne out by EVERY metric. They have lower crime rates, lower obesity, higher IQs, EVERYTHING IS BETTER THAN YOURS. You are sitting on a pile of shit, pretending it's a castle, and turning your nose up at caviar 'cause it smells funny.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 10:09 PM
1

No, he's being magnanimous. He said from the start that he would not have his campaign be negative or derogatory. He's not into Harper-style attack ads. That's the point. He has always taken the high road, and it shows. Hillary is a vicious cunt and everyone can see that. Bernie is the good guy you can trust who doesn't stoop to her level.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 10:05 PM
0

re: "using stolen money from other people" "freebies" "Handouts" "plants into success" etc., these are all strawmen of socialism and of Bernie's policies. I don't think Bernie is redpill at all in his personal life, but his economic policies are all correct. Millenials like myself are not afraid of hardwork, the issue is rather that our economic system (in US and Canada both) is becoming increasing feudalistic, where it no longer matters how hard you work or how smart you are, there is literally…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 09:58 PM
0

I think you lack critical thinking skills, to be honest. Are you unaware that this video has been cut in half? I could tell by the nature of Bernie's initial response that there is missing context. He's a rational guy, he doesn't just go off on a random tangent. There's already a hostile interaction going on. It's clear that the interviewer is trying to trap him in some stupid position, apparently that it's wrong to enforce laws. Sure enough, when Bernie finally answers his inane question he "sp…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 09:52 PM
1

Yes, the working class gets hit hard. That's why you need to increase taxes on the very rich, and saying "oh well they'll just avoid those taxes, so let's tax the middle class some more" isn't going to solve it. You need to hold their feet to the fire. The rich are rich because they have corporations operating in America. People say they can just move their wealth out of the country if you tax them... maybe, but they can't move their income source out. If jailed, they can do neither. America had…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 09:42 PM
2

Are you arguing with me or agreeing? I agree with everything you said.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 09:26 PM
-4

I get that you believe that and why, but all the evidence I have seen appears to contradict your ideas. You appear to be working with half of an economic theory, while the socialists are working with a full deck of successful nations with proven economic track records and far better results. If you can, please prove me wrong by pointing to a nation with less taxes or regulations that has resulted in prosperity and reasonable income equality (no one expects or wants communistic perfect equality, …
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 08:56 AM
3

Exactly. I lumped monopoly into negative externality but market failure was the correct term.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 08:44 AM
-1

I disagree, but even if that was the case, Bernie's fight against the elites is much more important than Trump's fight against SJWs. As much I support Trump in that quest as well, I don't think he'll do anything meaningful to support the common man. To tie this back to sexual strategy for men: Do you want rising income inequality and extremely poor, FAT, and stupid women? The number of eligible women in America is on the decline. This is a direct consequence of poor, uneducated women eating junk…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 08:00 AM
32

I always wondered what conservatives were talking about when they brought up their fiscal policies as though they made sense based on economic theory. So I took an intro to econ course and found out that conservatives conveniently leave out half the course material in their proposals. Namely, they assert that free trade and unregulated markets result in the most efficiency (which is great) but ignore the massive inefficiency caused by negative externalities, such as pollution and monopoly/oligop…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 07:26 AM
0

I'm also a Canadian and have no say, but have been pro Trump and pro Bernie all the way as well. I don't know how people don't see it, but they're very much two sides to the same coin, which is anti-establishment. They both speak what they believe are uncomfortable truths. Bernie is up against the billionaires who brainwash you into accepting institutionalized slavery, and Trump is up against the Leftist media trying to brainwash you with PC/marxist bullshit. They are both libertarian in a sense…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 07:14 AM
23

He's not really a Democrat, he's an anti-establishment Independent, and he pays lip service to the feminists to get their votes so he can continue to push his agenda, which is essentially income inequality. This applies to all Americans, especially the "temporarily disenfranchised millionaire" Republicans who continue to vote against their own best interest (not that any other Dems besides Bernie have ever worked in their interest either, your 2 party political system is a joke). Edit for downvo…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 07:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter