TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gmano Archive

View 2 posts and 106 comments by gmano on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'm not trying to argue. As a parent I'm genuinely interested in hearing your points so I can be a better dad when my teenagers are awkward and 14.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 07:55 PM
1

There are many reasons. Can you share your perspective? I'd like to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 02:47 PM
1

I did use to hang out with the "nerds" in school and have kept in touch whne I can. And those guys can't score. At all. That's funny, cause in my observation the nerds I know are doing WAY better. I know a guy who was a competitive starcraft player in the times before Twitch was a thing who is now getting and MBA and is one of the most social guys I know. Just left a 5 year long relationship. I know one guy who was totally a 4channer who went into sales and just got engaged. I know one of those …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 02:42 PM
1

Well, that and they consider future earnings.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/20 02:37 AM
1

Signing an affidavit is a scary proposition. I know people on disability that are terrified every time they find loose coins in their couch because they are afraid that they will get kicked off the program for lying about how much money they had around the house.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 04:42 PM
6

I looked at your post history and I gotta say: I side with the mods on this one. None of the sources on the posts you made were high-quality and running around calling people Nazis is not a good way to get them on your side.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 04:07 PM
1

If most sex is hetero and NMen = NWomen then there should be exactly the same average partners per sex. The only reason that wouldn't be is if for some reason people were lying about their numbers and self reporting on sensitive personal issues was notoriously inaccurate. But since that's clearly impossible everybody is gay now, I guess? /s Edit: actually, it might speak to wildly imbalanced populations... If there are 3x as many women on campus then for a given amount of sex the female avg will…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 09:47 PM
1

All we know is that they got angry that one time, it's also possible that since they have transitioned to a man the way people speak to them had changed, resulting in the appearance of lower listening skills despite little change to their own behaviour. And/or their new look influences their personality like how clithing and hair influences anybody's.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 02:55 PM
1

Alternatively, since changing their identity and presentation they and their friend have started to change their interpersonal dynamics to be more in-line with what they expect out of a male-female relationship. Because when I listen to girls talk to one another they speak very differently than when talking to a man.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 02:50 PM
2

It's also completely fucking insane to suggest that these games make some kind of statement about the gender based injustice of conscription. These are fictional power fantasies, and no argument about how badly the 40s treated men as a class convinces me that we should deny half the potential player base the ability to participate in this media with a character model that matches their own identity.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:45 AM
5

The difference is that this woman is allowed to to remain on Twitter, keep her verified status, and will probably face no repercussions for her feed full of calls for genocide. Incels are routinely banned from social media, and generally don't have much of a platform.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 05:06 PM
11

As for your netflix example, yes, but you would find it difficult to prove you were drunk, though I suspect if you emailed netflix the next day and asked for a refund, stating you were drunk, they would give it to you. You're missing the point... you can't just take sex back, there's no one month free trial on a drunken encounter after which you can end it without consequences. Women are smart, strong, capable people and they have the power and the right to have their decisions be taken seriousl…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 02:28 PM
13

http://nytimes.com/2016/07/15/movies/ghostbusters-review-melissa-mccarthy-kristen-wiig.html That headline says it all. No commentary on the merits of the movie or the jokes, just a blanket statement about an entire group of people.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 07:02 PM
41

You have such wonderful prose. Keep writing more things.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 04:52 PM
1

The only way to win against a bully is to bully back! What? No. That's precisely the wrong thing to do, bullying back legitimizes the tactics and provides them with something to attack you for. If you bully back the more popular side simply wins. You need to be better, more sympathetic, have less vulnerability, be perceived as nicer more just. That is how you win hearts and minds.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:56 PM
13

I had a similar experience at a startup pharmaceuticals company back when I was a co-op student during my undergrad. The leader of my team, was... not great. She incorporated a lot of superstition into SOPs, meaning we were told to carry out completely unnecessary or actively harmful steps, and many days and tens of thousands of dollars in materials were wasted to experiments based on hunches with neither a theoretical backing or even a goal in mind. The 8 people under her took to simply ignorin…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 03:33 AM
9

Pretty sure they mean Munchausen Syndrome.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 12:14 AM
2

He's known as a talented scientist among the people for whom such things matter. Because universities have never been known to be political organizations. This has pretty severe consequences for the guy. Yes, he probably should have been thinking PR if he was going to a press conference, but this is certainly going to hurt him.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 04:47 AM
2

Actually, given that the VAST majority of the money being circulated is actually derived from 401-Ks and the like, those two stole from average, everyday people.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 06:39 AM
2

What she said is proof enough that she doesn't understand what's going on. If you want to say that, then say that. Not that she's an actor.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 06:32 AM
3

It most certainly is. If a chimpanzee gives a thoughtful, poignant argument that is wholely true and undeniable through logic, it is not a valid counter to say that they are an ape. You are not addressing what they are saying i.e. the veracity of what they say is unquestioned and remains no less true.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 02:49 AM
4

The first thing this sub needs is to be taken seriously by the world. We can be humerous as long as we are a worthwhile spot to discuss issues: memes harm that by reducing things to old, repeatable sentences that are, by their nature, short and silly.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 07:42 PM
2

Dominating any debate is the best way of winning it. No. What? No. In a debate you are not trying to convince or defeat you opponent, you are trying to persuade everybody watching the debate. Your opponent's mind is not going to change. Your Poland example is actually a pretty good one for my case. If the world had gone to war pre-emptively the Nazis may well have been able to spin a case that they were being oppressed, the US may well have backed Germany, as it was it took America 4 years to de…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:14 PM
3

That's exactly what I am saying. First wave feminism got its traction by picking their battles, ceding where they needed to, and being sound and reasonable. They first picked their battle on the restricted nature of their relationships and livelihoods, writing thoughtful articles about how they wished education to be more open until they convinced a single college to offer degrees to women. Once they reached that small, critical mass, other college started to change their minds. Proper first wav…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:38 PM
4

The only way to advance a cause is to be better. If you despise contemporary feminism because it is a poop-flinging ape then the response is to say that convincingly and in a way that makes the world listen to you and take you seriously. Not to shit into your hand and return fire. You arn't "taking back your rights" by being a child, you are simply making yourself look bad, and by extension making the entire movement look like pathetic wimps. That's exactly the image that MRAs have in society to…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:24 PM
13

The last thing this sub needs is memes.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:04 PM
-1

That's literally the definintion of ad-hominem. argumentum ad hominem: a form of criticism directed at something about the person one is criticizing, rather than something (potentially, at least) independent of that person. Your views on her career as an ambassador to the UN and a person who works in film and TV is completely irrelevant to the content of her argument. Since nothing you said actually addressed her points, instead only attacking a person, it's the literal definition of ad-hominem.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 03:58 PM
20

Way too much of this on this sub. Read the rules, guys (and gals), it doesn't matter what you think of a post, or how much you agree with it. Vote on the content, how relevant it is, and how much it furthers the discussion of Men's issues. Being pithy about how you don't view acting as real work, or how you don't respect someone's life experience actively harms the progress this sub ought to be about.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:54 AM
2

Personally, I find that reading "F*ck" elicits a much more mild response than reading "Fuck"... This might just be me, though.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:35 PM
5

Sometimes you want the enhancement of a swear word, but you don't want the harshness or negative associations of cursing.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:08 PM
-1

Last time I checked "cunt" was a gendered insult, and just calling the whole crowd dumb without any substantive criticism just makes you seem petty. If you want the MRM to be taken seriously you need to avoid seeming petty and insulting.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:06 PM
-5

Do you think that gendered slurs help the case of the movement as a whole? If you want the MRM to have a strong basis and any support from the public it needs to be BETTER, not whining and filled with childish insults.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:41 PM
1

Girls tend to hit puberty earlier than boys do, on the whole, so a 13 year old girl is more developed than a 13 year old boy.... I guess people assume that's still true at age 16+?
/r/MensRights19/08/14 10:01 PM
20

Depending on the trucking route. Some of them are ludicrously dangerous.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 05:40 PM
22

Not that I disagree with you, but to play devil's advocate: if your bra strap is visible from something as mundane as bending the wrong way then maybe your clothing is not in-line with what the authorities deem acceptable? Is it fairly common for boys with low-riding pants and thin tanktops to be told to change outfits?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:06 AM
2

I don't think it's a meaningful criticism to point out comparisons to or anger towards feminism, and I'll use one such comparison to illustrate why: could feminism have gained any momentum without the patriarchy theory? I'm willing to bet that most feminist-themed areas discuss patriarchy theory and/or male power, is it meaningful to complain that intersectional feminists make comparisons to white males? (Setting aside issues of cherry picking or any other bias)
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:27 AM
4

And you think broad declarations like that make you seem reasonable or make MRAs seem open to discourse?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:41 PM
2

Oh yeah, for sure, the cop should have listened, that's part of their job. But most of the dispatcher's job is getting cops to go to where they are needed.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 09:43 PM
1

Part of the murder investigation, sure... but not part of the getting to officers to where they need to be. The dispatcher calls for available officers to go to the address and gives them the info. Something along the lines of "Domestic abuse is ongoing at <address>, go there now car #"
/r/MensRights04/05/14 09:35 PM
-1

"Come listen to this, it sounds bad" is very different from "Go and investigate this case".
/r/MensRights04/05/14 09:22 PM
1

Dispatcher's job is to dispatch, not ask officers if they have a free moment to listen to some verbal abuse.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:15 PM
2

... Because the pay "cut" was due to the fact that they had a contracted salary with their employer for a certain amount of money and a 45 hour work week. When the new owners came in they were moved to a 35 hour workweek and given the extra hours as overtime, however, to compensate for the overtime pay being higher, their base salary was cut. That base cut is what is at issue, and the reasons are simply due to a very strange policy enforcement by the university, which attempted to maintain the s…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 02:59 AM
-7

...So it's not a Men's Rights issue..
/r/MensRights25/04/14 12:37 AM
1

In Canada "Life without parole" still allows you the right to go before a parole board after 15 years.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 10:07 PM
2

The long term bonuses that the title article talk about weren't available to akerson, the FED stipulated that while they still had partial ownership of GM certain caps on the long-term incentive had to be in place. This is over and now Barra is getting an additional 10M in stock options.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 06:38 PM
12

http://autos.yahoo.com/blogs/motoramic/why-gm-pay-gap-first-female-ceo-isn-202429910.html Long story short: Akerson used to handle the jobs of ceo, and president. Upon his departure he split ceo into chairperson and ceo, and Dan Amman took over president. Couple that with the fact that he isn't completely leaving, and still has executive responability, and there are 4 people to do the job he used to do solo.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 06:08 PM
61

Yeah, in fact the job is being split by 4 people. She is doing 25% of the work and earning 160% of the money.... Clearly there is some sexism going on here.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 07:03 AM
4

I love the implication that men are like animals, and putting them in a cage is more suitable than putting a woman in a cage.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:03 PM
0

I'd say making up 70% of the future skilled labour force is definitely an imbalance.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:54 AM
1

Insurance is gambling against the company. They bet that you won't get hurt or sick at a cost more than the deductible. You put up your bet every month and arn't allowed to cheat.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 06:17 PM
1

I think Zeta was saying the opposite, that he wishes he has more skin to insulate him. I am uncut and Canadian, it has never been a problem.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:42 AM
4

To add to this, THIS ARTICLE, written by a facebook moderator will give you insight as to WHY some of the legitimate hatespeech they see is completely ignored.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:49 PM
1

Their insides are! I'll like you to An AMA by a tampon R&D engineer
/r/MensRights06/10/13 12:43 AM
5

because women don't have the same physical responses as men They do... The exact same mechanisms that produce a boner make a lady wet. Blood pressure increases in the area, filling the soft muscle tissues and causing them to swell. The only difference is that in a male it is all contained and inflates into a boner, in a woman she becomes lubricates (and inflates, but that's internally and hard to see).
/r/MensRights05/10/13 09:35 PM
1

It's equality of outcome, not opportunity.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 08:01 AM
2

I realize that the comment could be seen as bigoted or antagonistic, just want to follow up by saying it wasn't meant to be. I suppose I am uneducated about the motives of trans individuals to make the changes that they do. Two things: I found this section of your comment to be a little confusing, can you clarify it? when I wake up every day, I feel physically wrong due to the dysphoria I experience. Because while my gender is feminine, but closer to androgynous than hyper-feminine, my gender id…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 08:52 PM
0

I would say that 300 million people is pretty common.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:27 PM
0

I wholeheartedly agree. I am all for people deciding who they want to be, but for trans individuals I always wonder why they can't be a man who wears makeup and skirts (and I intentionally gendered that statement because the m-to-f rate is 6-8x the reverse, and I often feel like it is because men in our society are less free to make their own choices). It actually bugs me a bit to hear them champion gender as a social construct while simultaneously receiving hormone therapy because they feel res…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:21 PM
2

A one time expense for a medical operation is different from a life-long burden with punishment of jail if you fail to keep up. I don't disagree with you that youths or lower-income women have it hard. But I wanted to point out the fallacy.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 01:53 PM
3

No question on Finding Nemo. As for Up... Russell's dad is portayed more as the norm than Carl is, but it's still an overall win.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 11:55 AM
13

Let's not forget Monster's Inc. ! ... Shit. (but seriously, many pixar movies have a fatherhood theme)
/r/MensRights27/06/13 11:14 AM
2

There are female MRAs.... Also, why would a group of people who are interested in gender-related issues not be present in gender-related-issues subreddits?
/r/MensRights26/05/13 11:56 PM
2

Not to mention the psychological harms to the child who has no conception of what was wrong and who is to blame, and likely will never get an explanation.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:24 PM
1

That was not my intention. I was, however, generalizing the SRS subs and this type of not-sure-if-troll poster. Edit: Really just people who use the term "shitlord".
/r/MensRights19/03/13 10:54 AM
1

I applaud your gender neutral ninja edit, way to go!
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:26 PM
5

It says that things that they like are A-Okay, but if they don't agree or don't share a liking of something, that shit is the reason for every unfortunate occurrence in their life.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:58 PM
8

To be fair to them, Cinderella was from 1950, the list appears to be 1991 onwards.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:54 AM
20

Yeah, what's worse is that they listed Mulan up there... because it's not like screentime should be considered, or how often they are portrayed as powerful or anything, just how many minor characters exist.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:52 AM
-2

I am saying that people refer to Justin Beiber, or any other male, as a "boy" until proven otherwise (being perceived as sexually powerful, violence, or some other kind of test). However, when refering to Miley Cyrus or Selena Gomez they refer to them as "women" as soon as they hit 18.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 04:01 AM
45

This further underpins the fact that a male has to prove themselves to a greater extent to be deemed a man than a female does to be deemed a woman.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:31 PM
4

I saw the comment with very little context, I thought you were stating that "no matter which gender flip we go with, both are still responsible for intoxicating themselves." In that light I see my comment as a reasonable commentary.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 06:54 PM
2

Saying that someone is responsible for their own action of getting drunk usually results in cries of "victim blamer", and "supporting rape culture".
/r/MensRights05/11/12 06:25 PM
2

That would be victim blaming though.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:42 PM
2

This whole attitude towards male attitudes confuses cause and effect. There is a tendency for males to value sexual experience more than a female does, but this is a result of a culture that values males based on their conquests (look at the IMDB page "A man is not a Virgin" and related pages). There is a tendency to act aggressively because society pushes an image of a warrior/soldier/hero as the ideal man (note that this also plays into protecting "in groups"). There is a tendency to work long…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 01:06 AM
11

I think the argument used is that the females have devoted their lives to being wives and thus could have been payed more if they were not married, and so deserve the money they "lost" because they couldn't work as much.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:14 PM
6

People should harvest these cakes and fill the office of whatever official signed off on them, possibly arranging them to spell "Rape is never funny".... Peeing on them would really put the point across, but I feel like pee is funny, and that defeats the purpose of the message.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:59 AM
1

The median is it's own average, and the one most often used in these types of studies (as factors like income, appearance tend tend to be rated logarithmicly).
/r/MensRights05/06/12 03:45 PM
1

At the same time, you could blame the social expectation that a man's comfort, is worth less to them. Because they are worth less, they are the ones whose duty it is to do risky, shit jobs that pay more.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 03:43 PM
9

I tagged along with a friend to a sexual health centre, it was pleasent to see this poster up beside feminist propganda, it's easy for females who have been living in a very feminist influenced world to think that everything is against them. This poster highlights to them that the sword of the gender balance in society is double edged, and I respect it for that.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 08:14 AM
35

Pretty sure being forced to sacrifice things is usually less advantageous than to receive benefits of other's sacrifice.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 12:31 AM
1

Nope, adding to your comment so that all who read it get a deeper analysis.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 10:41 PM
3

There is no significant discreapancy with respect to hourly wage, the men the article talks about are the ones who work longer hours and with fewer vacations, not only does this mean that they work more payed hours per year, but that they accrue promotions more rapidly. Many women CHOOSE to work fewer hours, especially in situations where a couple's income is high, as the extra time at work is not worth it to them. In fact, we should blame the social view of men as the breadwinner for forcing me…
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:19 PM
7

That video. Of the 3 girls taking the clothes off of a disabled kid is twisted. The punishment for the girls? Misdemeanor battery, not even a school discipline. In what world is it okay for 3 13 year olds to strip and molest an 11 year old? Oh, that's right, this one.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 04:54 PM
3

not the radical anti-male kind, but the feminism that preaches equal treatment not just for women, but people of all races, religions, and sexual orientations... You are not a feminist, you are an egalitarian. If you believe in equality, you are egalitarian, if you believe that males should be subservient to females you are feminist. I feel safe in assuming the former.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 07:46 AM
5

for fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 07:39 AM
1

You have a fantastic point sir, have an upvote.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 06:00 PM
0

The article is basically saying that females are more geared to delayed gratification, and in achievement tests and IQ tests do not do as well as grades predict. The conclusions that I draw from this is because females will put more effort into non-test aspects of grades (homework, projects, presentations etc.) which in most high schools account for 50-70% of the student mark. Male tendency to rely on shortterm results has shown that in IQ tests (where rapid problem solving is tested) boys do be…
/r/MensRights24/08/11 01:48 AM
1

I'm not sure if anyone has told you, but Wikipedia is able to be written with a slant. Here, I'll go to google definitions and grab a cached version. Feminism refers to political, cultural, and economic movements seeking greater, equal, or, among a minority, superior rights and participation in society for women and girls. ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism Well shit. It appears that a movement that was designed to destroy all of the rights and participation of males in society is not about equa…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:57 PM
2

I'm sorry, I hate to inform you but EGALITARIANISM is about gender equality. Feminism IS about removing all power from half of the people in the world. Maybe before you yell at us you should do some research, k?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 05:47 AM
2

i'm a feminist in that i stand for equal rights for men and women. You are not a feminist, but an egalitarian, i suggest you stop referring to yourself as feminist if you actually want equality. Feminism is the belief that all sources of male power should be removed, it is built on the belief that men are evil. Feminism is not about equality, it is about making women powerful and shaming men.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 09:07 AM
2

Well, as a movement that seeks to represent the fair treatment of a gender I'd say that MRA has a view of gender, true it is one based in evidence and testing as opposed to dogma and assumptions, but it is a view nonetheless.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 07:03 AM
1

As long as they don't seek to impede the rights of the rest of us then let them be. If they start to ask for us to cede legal ground to them on the basis that they have been historically disenfranchised I would be quite upset. However they have not and usually only ask for things like more freely available re-assignment surgery, counselling, and awareness. As none of these impede me or the rest of humanity then they are welcome to everything that a human being should be entitled to, no more, no …
/r/MensRights18/07/11 07:00 AM
2

My comment on it: http://www.reddit.com/r/moviecritic/comments/imy3z/horrible_bosses_2011/c25blrj I liked most of the movie, but by the 14th "rape is hilarious" joke i was cringing. Seriously, they bring up everything from sexual harassment, unconscious rape, prison rape, coercion by blackmail (with a false rape report no less), coercion by threat of job loss, the inability of a sex offender to escape a situation where the above are happening AND MADE IT INTO JOKES. Otherwise a very funny film..…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:40 AM
2

Actually, at the time of my checking it seems that women trust the individual who's at risk of getting pregnant. Which makes sense.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 04:48 PM
2

Yeah, about that.... Maybe towards the end? It seemed to actually blame men and suggest that women are still disadvantaged. I know the show is 10 years old, but surly the writers are up to date on this type of thing before making an episode?
/r/MensRights24/06/11 07:11 AM
4

"Don't make me force your hand into my panties, It makes me feel like a rapist." Right, and given the rate of false accusal and anti-rape propaganda men are supposed to feel better?
/r/MensRights17/06/11 06:27 PM
2

No, you can be an egalitarian, but you cannot have two opposing philosophies. Kudos for you for wanting to educate yourself. I'd suggest looking around on r/mensrights and r/equality.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 06:13 PM
-1

Yeah... The bar wants to have a LOT of women get VERY drunk. It's what everyone who is going to these bars want to see, a chance to get some. Sadly, these girls and their cheap, strong drinks will likely say that someone drugged them, since they can't have been drunk from alcohol!
/r/MensRights11/06/11 10:42 PM
1

I love it, one time I was hitchhiking back from a toga party (it was mid day) and got a ton of catcalls from girls, I loved it. Now every time I hear a girl complain about them I just laugh at them.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 10:16 PM
2

/r/feminism is populated by feminist propaganda, which utilizes as much false data and propaganda as possible in order to gather support. This more insane and hateful the mob is, the louder they are and the more money they get.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 09:41 PM
2

On average black men have longer limbs and are likely to be in areas with low-incomes or place more emphasis on sports. Meaning that they are stronger. The low income aspect means that they are more likely to commit crimes. So we have shown how 1) minorities are stronger. 2) are more likely to commit crime. While on the other hand. MEN ARE RAPED MORE OFTEN THAN WOMEN IN A RELATIONSHIP
/r/MensRights11/06/11 07:38 PM
-1

Feminists like to quote studies in which women were asked "have you ever felt pressured to have sex". Note that a yes answer could mean that nothing happened, or that her friends pressured her, or that SHE pressured herself. (honestly, who hasn't pressured themselves to do something) The answer to this question is a large yes (70% ish) and it is taken to mean that 70% of women will be raped in their life.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 07:12 PM
14

while most men are not rapists, most rapists are men. It makes sense, then, that most of the ads would be directed at men. But isn't that the point the author is trying to make? I could say that "while most minorities are not criminals, most criminals are minorities." and I can garuntee you that there are a large number of people (especially low-income individuals) that fantasize about purse snatching. Hell, I can be considered well-off (college educated etc.) and I fantasize about BNEs and thef…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 07:07 PM
8

SECOND DEGREE COERCION?
/r/MensRights09/06/11 06:42 PM
2

The words are used to describe people who abuse men and utilize stereotypes, false data and double standards to manipulate society into harming over half of the world's population. In any situation like this there will undoubtedly be some anger. In addition it helps some men deal with the social imbalance to use derogatory terms in a harmless and safe setting in order to help themselves deal with things that they have to live with every day. Give them a break because I know that there are more w…
/r/MensRights05/06/11 08:22 PM
1

I agree, where is my train car to escape girls who are high on the slutwalk lifestyle late at night on a weekend? These girls comment at me and whistle to me and even grope me and it's uncomfortable, where is MY private train to escape THEM?
/r/MensRights31/05/11 04:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter