TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gocks Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by gocks on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Where?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/19 02:29 PM
1

True dat.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/19 04:59 PM
4

'dat foot tho'.... daymn...
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/18 12:51 PM
23

It must be sex vs sex! It must be class vs class! Fucking communists are everywhere.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/18 06:26 PM
-2

Russians do it better.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/18 02:37 PM
1

That's exactly what I wanted to tell you: do not grow into an extremist. :-) Society is where it is today after thousands of years of evolution. You should strive to have a "society disruption" but you must respect "the rules of human rights;" can't build a free society by infringing other people's rights.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/17 05:20 PM
0

That's the theory of human rights, a mighty good one if I may say so. Just like the theory of relativity. If you have a better theory go ahead. Your theory of "rights being created and given by the society" is a stupidly dangerous one. We've seen throughout whole human history that rights never came from the state, most of the time it was the states that destroyed them together with hundreds of millions of poor souls. If you cherish freedom, you will cherish your private property (rights being o…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/17 05:07 PM
0

Rights are objective, the fact you can lose them does not mean they do not exist. Society can infringe or can protect but most certainly cannot give. Did people of North Korea have rights to life and private property? Of course they had them. But they had no might to protect their rights so they were lost. Give it time and they'll get them back. Remember, rights are private property, it is not for society to define them, there are no rights in communism. Communism, yes, a nice example, where eve…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/17 04:59 PM
-1

What if my happiness is predicated on another's unhappiness? What if my free speech causes another persons unhappiness? Then it is no longer your right, you forfeited it. You can codify whatever you want, as in "right to have 1.000.000 dollars", "free education," "free health care" it would not be a right as it would infringe on other's right to private property. At most it would be a service you are purchasing through taxes, coercion and firerams in hands of the government. Society cannot give …
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/17 04:45 PM
-1

Society does not grant any rights. We use society to protect our rights as it's cheaper than doing it by ourselves with our own guns, time and money. There is no "universal body" or "god" or whatever stupidity that gives us rights. Remember rights cannot be given. Why didn't slaves have rights? They most certainly did have them, but they did not have the might to protected them. Their rights were swiftly taken by those with might. Slave ownership was NEVER a right, as it had to infringe on other…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/17 04:30 PM
3

Of course might protects rights. Just like might could take your rights away. No, the rights do not come from the invisible guy that lives in the sky. We are too old to have such friends. Rights are private property, rights are whatever you are able to provide to yourself as long as you do not infringe on other's rights in order to get them. Rights cannot be given, they can only be protected or taken. Rights cease to be rights if they infringe upon other's rights. Can animals have rights? Let's …
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/17 04:02 PM
3

Dude you absolutely have no idea what the bill of rights is. Go read it, it's the document curtailing the government's power, making sure it never goes against human rights. That's it. It does not grant a single right, it just tells government to piss off for some of them specifically but also making sure to mention that the list is not final and it does not encompass all human rights. Your rights are inalienable and come from "the creator" itself. You as a free person can decide how to protect …
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/17 03:38 PM
1

They say stupid people do not realise they are stupid. You are a nice example confirming the theorem. When exactly did you sign up for the laws you need to follow? Did you write those laws? What happens if you do not follow laws you did not sign up for? People with guns come to take your life. Go ahead thinking "oh, it's logical that you have to listen to the people with guns, because... because... ah yes, they will kill me if I do not do what they tell me to do." No moron, people do not need la…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/17 02:41 PM
2

Human rights exist with or without the state and are yours from the moment you are born. You can protected by yourself (use your own gun), by paying a private security company or by paying a public company via taxes. Rights most certainly do not come as a gift from a state via laws. Only services come from the state: Public security Public health system Public transport system Public education system All those are services you purchase with your taxes. None of those are human rights. We have the…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/17 02:37 PM
1

Dude, you are stupid and you don't even realise it. You did not sign up to follow the laws. They were put there by people with guns, even in USA. You may want to follow the laws because you are not the one that has the gun but that's it. Saying "you have to" is moronic. Why do you have to? A.... ? Did you sign a contract? No? Did you write the laws? No? Did you approve the laws? No? And yet "you have to?" Dude, you are not smart, at all. People follow the law because if they don't people with gu…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/17 05:52 AM
0

Really? Maybe you are thinking about services? Even those (e.g. police protection) are not guaranteed. If you are thinking of bill of rights, it is not the source of rights, it is the list of prohibitions curtailing the government power.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/17 03:26 PM
-1

What´s wrong with anarchy, where people go into contractual agreements by their own free will? Those with gun in the hand will do whatever they want, that is true, they'll enforce their laws. That doesn't mean that those laws were signed up by the people.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/17 03:25 PM
-12

You do not have to follow the laws, you never signed up to follow them. There are consecuences as stronger (state) will try to use law against the weak (free people). Just don't act surprised when it comes down to what is the base of the society: who holds the gun.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/17 09:23 AM
1

Supreme court concluded you have rights with or without US citizenship.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/17 06:36 AM
3

Rights do not come from the laws. WTF are you talking about?!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/17 06:35 AM
1

Is her last name Ghalager?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 06:17 PM
-1

...and the wizard beard!
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/17 06:20 PM
154

How can she slap! HOW CAN SHE SLAP!
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/17 06:20 PM
1

Death?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/17 11:12 PM
13

The mighty "Tunguska" slap
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/16 06:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter