godlesspinko Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
28	Not re-posting this to start a fight, but hopefully to aid discussion. The feminisms sub-reddit is talking about the MensRights subreddit		godlesspinko	/r/MensRights	17/02/09 09:09 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Thank Men Ah, one random chick on the internet responding to a cat-fisher. Brilliant.	/r/MensRights	27/04/19 01:39 AM
-3	Thank Men Men in feminism are told good "allies" are to remain quiet and do as they're told. Reference please.	/r/MensRights	26/04/19 07:30 AM
-5	Drunk chick takes on police. Pussy pass Denied! When did the downvotes become "down clinton's"? Didn't realize the mods were rightwing neckbeard morons.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/06/18 01:56 AM
5	Woman will not get out of a man's car The other passengers wouldn't deserve that.	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/04/18 06:24 AM
2	You got this girls! Ladies, just remember that not putting the seat down is preferable to not putting it up. At least this way you don't have to wipe someone's pee off of it.	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/03/18 11:12 PM
2	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. The electoral college is an unfair advantage for rural, less educated, more xenophobic states. Fox is MSM, and you;re the one drinking the kool-aid. Check out Trump's contacts with Russia. They were the only ones that would loan him money after his string of bankruptcies. Trump is a traitor, and you are too, for supporting him. Also, no idea what you are talking about with educated women voting for Trump. Educated people in general voted for Clinton. Uneducated people vote for Trump. There are o…	/r/TheRedPill	06/01/18 11:00 PM
2	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. Not sure why Trump has suddenly made an appearance in this argument, but I'll bite: Only about half of the population voted in the election. Trump, didn't win the popular vote, and he had the help of the Russians. If you are saying that the Red Pill is winning the reality war, you should know you are talking about less than a quarter of the population, and the least well-educated portion at that.	/r/TheRedPill	03/01/18 04:26 AM
1	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. They are married, she is absolutely entitled to all proceeds of the partnership. The law agree, society agrees. Yours is the minority opinion of the socially incompetent, emotionally bankrupt materialists. If you don't want this to happen to you, it is very simple: Don't get married. Luckily, your personality makes that an unlikely possibility. Have fun with all of the money you might make, and the lonely existence of not having anyone to share it with.	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 11:00 PM
-2	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. No, there's just enough of you jerkoffs to scrape the front page before you're all downvoted to shit for being the bitter dorks you are.	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 10:48 PM
1	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. I'm not treating her as a child,but as an equal partner, who brings more to the table than simply cash. She brings a meaningful relationship. How much would you say the relationship between your dad and mom is worth to them, or if they aren't together, how about the relationship of you and your mother? Can that be quantified in terms of money? If it can, that's pretty sad. You're also assuming an awful lot about their relationship. Bottom line is that they got married, which makes them equals un…	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 10:34 PM
-1	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. He encouraged her to quit a well-paying job. They were considering becoming parents, she supplies stability, emotional support, encouragement and whatever else was necessary for him to pursue his side project. They married for richer or poorer. If he lost his job, she would have been supporting him. Now he makes some money and he doesn't want her to be entitled to any of it? You're a misogynist and have a very narrow way of thinking. Good luck ever having a meaningful relationship when you value…	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 09:57 PM
0	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. If he hadn't encouraged her to quit her job, then she wouldn't be relying on him for a living. And if you know anything about marriage, it's a partnership, and things like emotional support, relationship dynamics and caring for someone are at least as important as the money. If you can't understand that, you've never experienced it, and I feel sad for you. Also, that is literally the way the law looks at this- they are a partnership, and it's 50/50. Both parties knew that going in. For better or…	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 06:21 PM
-1	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. Nah, your menagerie of morons just made the front page. I'm not subscribed, I forgot your sub of lonely losers existed. Just weighing in to let you all know that you're wrong, jaded, and losing the reality war.	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 06:18 PM
-3	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. Thank god. Red pillers are apparently basement dwelling neckbeards who get their knowledge of women from talk radio and porn. Enjoy jerking off by yourself for the rest of your lonely pathetic lives redpill men!	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 09:35 AM
-2	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. Get off the internet Mr. President.	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 09:30 AM
1	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. Amen. These guys are a bunch of cavemen for thinking otherwise.	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 09:20 AM
-2	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. You've never been in a ltr have you? When they married they became partners, and they share all assets in common. She is absolutely entitled to half when dumbass divorces her to look for new pussy. Hope she takes him to the cleaners for undermining their relationship.	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 09:18 AM
-9	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. No, that sub is normal, helpful and human. This sub is made up of demented dudes that don't have the capacity for monogamy.	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 09:13 AM
1	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. She is entitled to half of his net worth, legally and literally.	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 09:04 AM
-3	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. I hope she takes him for half if he pushes it. What a douchebag.	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 08:59 AM
-2	Wife's husband makes millions, he asks for a post-nup to protect his assets, but she's "confused" and doesn't feel the need for a post-nup because she would never hurt him. Hell no, she should NOT sign a post-nup, and that guy is a cretin for asking for one. Before his business partnership, he had a romantic one. One that he wanted (wants?) to raise children with. She supported him emotionally and perhaps in other ways, and now he wants her to sign away their marriage contract because he got more money? He is def. thinking of shopping around for new pussy. Both he and op apparently view women as less important than money. He just introduced that materialism to thei…	/r/TheRedPill	27/12/17 08:55 AM
1	Women accused of shoplifting started a brawl in a supermarket. A) It's not a supermarket B) They never said whether or not they had actually shoplifted anything. C) They should have gone out the back	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/10/17 12:47 AM
33	Texas forces man to pay 65,000 USD for a kid that DNA tests showed is not his Depends. Sometimes one or both parents are shitty people and the kid is better off with just one or none of them.	/r/MensRights	19/08/17 07:55 PM
3	Texas forces man to pay 65,000 USD for a kid that DNA tests showed is not his Sounds like it would be cheaper to appeal that decision again and again and again.	/r/MensRights	19/08/17 07:54 PM
2	#1 Trending Video on YouTube today is titled "Alpha Males Do Not Exist" Both viewpoints are complete generalities. People adapt to the situations they find themselves in, and some approaches work better than others. Both "masculine" and "feminine" virtues are necessary, and help us adapt to different situations. There are billions of people in this world, and aside from basic survival, they all have different ideas of what success means, and who they want to be. A strong empowered man can be a great protector, or a vain power-grabbing villain. A effeminate and emoti…	/r/TheRedPill	04/08/17 06:56 AM
0	Gender Equality? Strawman argument. People do things contrary to their ideologies, but there is nothing in feminist ideology that encourages violence against men.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 04:06 AM
0	Gender Equality? Ad hominem. You still have yet to present an argument.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 02:12 AM
-2	Gender Equality? There is nothing in feminism that posits that women can hit men.	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/04/17 07:28 PM
2	Father who beat man to death for raping his five year old daughter faces no charges in Texas: Fathers have a natural right to defend their children. I am as liberal as anyone but if I found somebody raping my five year old daughter I would kill the f*** out of them. The law is just in this case.	/r/MensRights	15/03/17 07:21 PM
1	Apply shit to burnt area You are failing to see the hypocrisy of the poster who is body shaming a group of people and then cries foul when she is body shamed. This is tit for tat. She's a bully, she got bullied back. Eye for an eye.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/03/17 06:29 AM
1	Apply shit to burnt area Basically, you're fat but think it's ok to make fun of short people. Got it.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/03/17 05:53 AM
1	Apply shit to burnt area 1) So basically, you would defend the KKK for spewing racist hatred. 2) Every man under 6 feet tall was the intended target of her scorn.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/03/17 09:29 PM
3	Apply shit to burnt area By the same logic I should be able to make a "funny message" about not liking black people, but when one of them replies and calls me a cracker, I have been victimized. You are the one making apologies for cyber-bullying. I am just cheering on a cyber-bully getting their ass handed to them publicly.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/03/17 08:38 PM
1	Apply shit to burnt area Thanks for the statistical analysis I'll be sure to let Usher, Robert Downey jr., Jon Stewart et al know that they are less attractive than fat women.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/03/17 08:11 PM
1	Apply shit to burnt area You are defending a double standard you have no argument	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/03/17 08:02 PM
3	Apply shit to burnt area Nah. Denigrating people for their height is on a par with racism. People can't change their height. So when you make an offensive comment targeting the majority of men, you can expect some blow back. And if you happen to be obese, you make an easy target.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/03/17 07:59 PM
8	Apply shit to burnt area It's simple cause-and-effect: make fun of people get made fun of. If she can't handle that then she should get off the internet. And I think there's more butthurt fatties than short guys.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/03/17 07:53 PM
1	"My son's life is not worth food stamps" - father furious after the woman who killed his son avoids jail despite a man receiving 5 years in prison for stealing food stamps that same day The legal system in the S is straight up bullshit of the highest order. The only thing that keeps it afloat is the sheer number of assholes trying to profit off of it.	/r/MensRights	09/01/16 09:44 AM
1	Feminist Karen DeCrow on Male Reproductive Rights the woman had this same choice AND gets the choice to abort / give up for adoption / keep the kid... But once conception happens it's no longer mutual - it's completely 1-sided yet affects both parties permanently and quite substantially. She also has the burden of carrying the child to term if she chooses to do so, then breastfeeding it for however long after that. Men don't have to do either of those things so I think it is fair that women have a bit more choice in the matter than men. As a wo…	/r/MensRights	28/08/15 07:34 PM
1	Feminist Karen DeCrow on Male Reproductive Rights A woman can make the choice to have or not to have a baby without the consent of the man. The man has no choice what so ever and is tied to whatever the woman decides. Sex is how we procreate. If a man doesn't want a kid, then his choice should be to not have sex, or to get a vasectomy, or to be in control of the birth control himself. Men have lots of choice. Men should have just as much choice as the woman does. So a man should be able to make a woman have an abortion if he doesn't want a kid?…	/r/MensRights	26/08/15 07:15 PM
-4	Feminist Karen DeCrow on Male Reproductive Rights Yes and no. If she lies about being on birth control or otherwise attempts to get pregnant when he has clearly stated he does not want a kid, that's one thing. But leaving a young mother high and dry because her mate doesn't want to raise a kid he helped create, and she doesn't want to kill or give up for adoption, is cold-blooded and evil. Moreover, who the fuck is supposed to finance this kid? What if something happens to the mother, or she is incapable of supporting a child on her own? Why do…	/r/MensRights	26/08/15 08:02 AM
4	Chanel West Coast arrested after bar fight and assaulting a cop. Tries to use TV career as a reason to be let go... Gets arrested anyways. Maybe if she did that vibrating donkey laugh all the way back to the precinct they'd kick her out of the car just to be rid of her.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/08/15 03:15 AM
35	The tables turn! You've got to feel like you are better than somebody, and if you lack intelligence to begin with, then short people seem like a good target.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/05/15 12:18 AM
–	'She has no right to be supported for life': Judge tells ex-wife of millionaire racehorse vet to get a job in landmark divorce case. She wasn't a stay at home mom for all of that time. "Stay at Home" generally means you stay at home with the kids. Unless you guys were home schooled, once your youngest brother was going to school for 6+ hours a day, your mom was pretty much a housewife. She chose to do that, instead of getting a second income for the family. So what you're saying is that because your Dad was nice enough to support her for 20 years, that she now deserves to be supported by him indefinitely? I disagree. If they …	/r/MensRights	23/02/15 06:26 PM
8	'She has no right to be supported for life': Judge tells ex-wife of millionaire racehorse vet to get a job in landmark divorce case. I don't think alimony should ever be awarded for longer than one year after a divorce, and that should only occur when the one not earning the money was a stay at home parent. Child support can go until the kid is 18, but there is no reason for someone to support their ex-spouse, especially not indefinitely.	/r/MensRights	23/02/15 05:57 PM
35	Judge says man must pay $30K in child support for kid who is not his Cheaper to appeal than to pay. This is the main problem with our judicial system- it assumes everyone has the education and resources to follow the law the way they want it to be followed. And they actuall think their BS process is more important than the facts of the case. If I was this guy I wouldn't pay a fucking dime.	/r/PussyPass	18/02/15 07:12 PM
4	My son's school had 'take your dad to school day' today. This was the literature they handed out. [x-post from /r/daddit] This flyer has more assumptions than a cigarette ad from the 50s.	/r/MensRights	01/10/14 03:21 AM
7	Think men are the unfaithful sex? A study shows WOMEN are the biggest cheats - they're just better at lying (read: hamstering) about it What a smugly written article. The author sounds almost proud of women cheating, like it's an achievement.	/r/TheRedPill	22/08/14 08:04 PM
6	Learn from me: 40 years old, 3 kids, divorced. Lots of good advice and anecdotes here, but if you're up for an honest opinion, there's also a lot of bravado and what looks like an inability to see fault in yourself. All I see is half of every story you reference. And the fact that you have so many makes me wonder if you didn't play quite the part you believed you did. But that's coming from a late 30s guy with his own triumphs and mistakes of his own, so maybe my criticism of you is a projected criticism of myself. Thanks for your story.	/r/TheRedPill	22/07/14 07:00 AM
2	Essentially how it goes. I don't think we should be spending billions on stealth bombers while ignoring infrastructure. Oh shit, I must be anti-military!	/r/MensRights	11/11/13 06:02 PM
-1	Real men have curves! Shut your whore mouth, /r/atheism rocks.	/r/MensRights	14/08/13 12:55 AM
0	Just more feminism double standards Nice comment, but none of it contradicted my own, so I'm going to go ahead and take back the other half of my truth now.	/r/MensRights	03/08/13 06:16 PM
124	Just more feminism double standards I think bodybuilders are more appreciated by men than women. I've heard a lot more women state a preference for a swimmers build than a super-muscular guy. A lot of women I know find bodybuilders disgusting to look at.	/r/MensRights	03/08/13 05:22 PM
1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents Abortion is a possibility, not the normal course of pregnancy. If you are playing poker and you lose, it's not up to the winner to give you your money back. It is a possibility, however unheard of, that he may choose to give you back your winnings if you make a fuss, but that's not how the game works. Having sex is a gamble too. The primary function of sex is reproduction. If conception occurs, you should be ready to pay the cost. If you are not, then don't play the game. Expecting the woman to …	/r/MensRights	28/01/13 04:55 PM
1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents Disagree. Abortion is not a 50/50 proposition. It is one option open to a pregnant woman. The reason women have more options is because reproduction takes place inside their body. The man's participation in the direct act of reproduction ends after he ejaculates. His choice in the matter is done once he inseminates his partner. Just because she chooses not to have a violating procedure done to end the life of the fetus doesn't mean your obligation to the newly created individual (with half of yo…	/r/MensRights	28/01/13 04:48 PM
1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents You lack objectivity.	/r/MensRights	28/01/13 04:43 PM
1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents If you don't want a kid, don't screw chicks without protection. Once you inseminate them, you are on the hook for half the cost. If you don't like that deal, get a vasectomy, because none of your arguments would fly in front of a judge.	/r/MensRights	28/01/13 04:42 PM
1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents Calling something a crock isn't an argument. Assuming pregnancy is a woman's fault is sexist. Society does raise quite a few kids- they're known as orphans, and they are at a marked economic and social disadvantage to kids with parents. The portion that one pays in taxes is not equal to what one pays to support a child. It is still unethical for the father to pass the expense on to the rest of society. But more than that, ignoring the duty to raise a child one had a hand in creating is not only …	/r/MensRights	19/01/13 09:44 AM
1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents Have you actually ever had to face this decision? You're making light of things which have a lot more gravity if you have ever had to live through them.	/r/MensRights	19/01/13 09:37 AM
1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents If I don't want herpes, I wrap my dick up. If I don't want to go through the windshield, I buckle up. Cause and effect. You fuck, you might reproduce. That's what fucking is for.	/r/MensRights	19/01/13 09:35 AM
1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents What reproductive investment? 10 mos. gestation which forever changes the shape of a woman's body. The risk of complications which before the advent of medicine lead to a lower life expectancy among women than men throughout history. Up to 4 years of nursing. Up to 18 years of raising a child, and a lifetime of continued investment in the best case scenario. Considering a good portion of men out there are the "wham, bam, thank you ma'am" type, why the fuck should they get half a say in such a hu…	/r/MensRights	19/01/13 09:31 AM
0	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents He can choose to be excused from the responsibilities of raising a child- all he has to do is not get her pregnant, which is actually VERY easy to do, if one is trying. Let's take this from a different perspective- say she has the baby, Dad gets off scottfree, then she applies for government aid to help raise the child. How is it fair to society to have to contribute tax monies to help raise a child when the father who sired it isn't obligated to support his own offspring? Why should third parti…	/r/MensRights	07/01/13 07:21 PM
1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents How is she excused from responsibility when she now has to decide whether to keep it or not, and must live with the consequences of having an abortion if she finds she cannot? When it comes down to it, men contribute 2 tablespoons worth of genetic material to the act of reproduction. Women contribute 10 months of pregnancy, many months of breast-feeding, and without the man's help, all of the financial costs of having a kid up until they are old enough to provide for themselves. Why is it fair t…	/r/MensRights	07/01/13 06:58 PM
0	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents Why do women get the sole choice in what becomes autonomous or not? It boils down to biology. Their reproductive investment is higher, and takes precedence.	/r/MensRights	07/01/13 12:34 AM
0	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents There are a variety of reasons one might elect to have an abortion, and the decision should be made on a case by case basis, on the counsel of her family and her doctor. Blanket laws can put the mother's life at stake.	/r/MensRights	07/01/13 12:29 AM
1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents But that just doesn't happen very often. In the cases where it does, let a court of law decide based upon the individual circumstances.	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 10:47 PM
-1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents No, I wouldn't. I've already drawn my line in the sand there, you are just choosing to ignore it. Abortion is a decision best left to the couple and their doctor. Once the child is born, it is an autonomous individual that the parents are legally required to care for.	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 10:46 PM
0	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents I think that logic is sound. Sex is reproductive behavior. If I don't want a job, I don't apply for one. If I don't want to win the lottery, I don't buy a ticket. If I don't want a kid, I either don't have sex or use birth control to minimize the chances. Once there's a kid in the picture, trying to get out of taking care of them because you don't want them is irresponsible, selfish behavior. If you don't want the responsibility, then don't take the risk.	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 10:36 PM
-1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents Absolutely. As should the males who conceived them. Otherwise it falls on society to pick up the slack.	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 10:33 PM
1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents I haven't changed any positions, I just don't agree with your definitions of them. Pregnant women provide food and nutrition to their offspring by design.	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 10:27 PM
0	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents Absolutely.	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 10:25 PM
1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents No, I wouldn't group child support/neglect under the banner of reproduction. The main difference being that the kid is now an autonomous individual capable of survival outside of the womb. People should absolutely be required to provide material support for their offspring if they are capable of doing so.	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 10:20 PM
0	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents This is a different argument altogether from the one discussed in the comic. Are you talking about rape or consensual sex?	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 10:16 PM
-1	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents I don't believe reproductive decisions should be legislated. Those decisions should be made between the couple involved and their doctor. But I am against a man conceiving a child and walking out on it.	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 10:11 PM
-2	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents If he's too drunk to know what he's doing, he likely can't get it up in the first place. Regardless, he should probably exercise better judgment when it comes to who he sleeps with if he is in danger of being taken advantage of in this way.	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 10:01 PM
-8	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents And a man can either risk having a kid by having sex, or simply not have sex if he doesn't want kids.	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 09:34 PM
-2	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents No, I'm not. But I am against a man unilaterally deciding that someone else needs to have one. I'm also against them shirking their responsibilities once one is conceived. As a man, if you don't want kids, the time to make that decision is before you have sex with a woman. You use birth control, you get a vasectomy and if either fails, and a child is conceived, then that's the way the game is played. Leaving a woman and your own child in the lurch because you want to be able to fuck without cons…	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 08:35 PM
-9	People who have pregnancy-producing sex and decide not to become parents Nah, this comic is full of shit. If you fuck a chick without protection and get her pregnant, guess what? You already made your fucking choice. You don't get to excuse yourself from the responsibility of your own actions simply because it is inconvenient to you. I would never leave a woman who was carrying my child bear all of the finances and responsibility for raising it. That is irresponsible, childish and stupid.	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 07:06 PM
3	You're an $80k/yr. web designer because we say so! Look into alternative dispute resolution. It can be cheaper to mediate this, and you can be a bit more candid than in a formal court environment. JAMS is one such mediation group that has a lot of locations.	/r/MensRights	08/12/12 05:27 PM
3	So I was bored and tried to make a simple picture showing why the MRM isn't a threat to women, women's issues, or feminism. I hope I didn't oversimplify it. No, men know more about the issues that affect men and how to address them, period. Full stop. To suggest otherwise would be an extremely sexist and ignorant thing to do.	/r/MensRights	26/11/12 08:41 PM
7	Women can destroy your property, its legal. Hope he dumped the bitch on her fat ass.	/r/MensRights	25/08/12 11:37 PM
2	Seduction for the sober guy Your post makes it seem like the only people that fuck are on drugs. While this may be true of the big risk takers in your life, I can assure you that normal everyday people have game too. Just go hang out with those people.	/r/seduction	04/08/12 08:30 AM
12	Alpha Women, Beta Men - When wives are the family breadwinners This article is obnoxious. It basically says men are useless unless they're making money, and men should be threatened by the success of their wives.	/r/MensRights	18/08/11 08:26 PM
-6	Why Women Think That 80% of Men are "Below Average" This article mentioned a few sources, but then abandoned them in favor of putting forth the author's recycled opinions on the subject. Just another guy with a chip on his shoulder repeating pop-evolutionary psych stuff with nothing to back it up save his own jaded POV.	/r/MensRights	15/07/11 06:21 PM
2	Hey r/MensRights - I'm a female trying to understand Don't forget about r/equality!	/r/MensRights	08/07/11 04:42 PM
1	Looks like it's over (my marriage) Sue her for libel/defamation/whatever. It's clearly her scumbag lawyer that suggested you be slandered to help her case. Make them prove it. And while you're at it, get on a plane and go retrieve your child.	/r/MensRights	23/04/11 11:25 PM
-1	Woman Engages in 'Extensive' Consensual Sex With a Stranger, Then it Suddenly Dawns on Her: This Might Not Play Well With Her Husband, So She Tells Rape Lie, Get 18 Months Like I said, I don't disagree with the verdict, I disagree with the sentence. Her actions fucked up her family, but 18 months will continue to fuck them up for a lot longer. And I'm not biased for her because she's a woman. I was falsely accused of sexual harassment once and was livid. I do believe that some people are incorrigibly stupid though, and that it takes a lot less time to learn a lesson than 18 months.	/r/MensRights	26/02/11 06:47 PM
0	Woman Engages in 'Extensive' Consensual Sex With a Stranger, Then it Suddenly Dawns on Her: This Might Not Play Well With Her Husband, So She Tells Rape Lie, Get 18 Months Fair enough- Perhaps a desperate mistake then. I think she was more on the stupid side of evil though, and less on the vindictive, pre-meditated side.	/r/MensRights	26/02/11 06:43 PM
3	Woman Engages in 'Extensive' Consensual Sex With a Stranger, Then it Suddenly Dawns on Her: This Might Not Play Well With Her Husband, So She Tells Rape Lie, Get 18 Months You have a lot to learn son.	/r/MensRights	26/02/11 08:34 AM
2	Woman Engages in 'Extensive' Consensual Sex With a Stranger, Then it Suddenly Dawns on Her: This Might Not Play Well With Her Husband, So She Tells Rape Lie, Get 18 Months No, I think not sleeping with married women* will suffice in the advice dept., thanks. *Unless she's your wife. Really- it's a fucking scumbag move	/r/MensRights	26/02/11 08:34 AM
-6	Woman Engages in 'Extensive' Consensual Sex With a Stranger, Then it Suddenly Dawns on Her: This Might Not Play Well With Her Husband, So She Tells Rape Lie, Get 18 Months She made two drunken mistakes and is doing 18 months? I know I'll get shit on for this, but I think that's too much time for a mother to spend away from her young children. Perhaps a month in jail, community service and an apology would be enough.	/r/MensRights	26/02/11 08:31 AM
12	What Happens When You Call the Cops to “Help” a Man I wish the author of the piece would just write the facts and leave his fucking editorializing out of it. I hate being told what to think.	/r/MensRights	18/11/10 12:56 AM
3	Fourteen Years in Jail on Alimony Contempt Charges But, after 14 years, Judge Cronin said, the contempt order had lost its coercive effect and instead had become punitive. Gee, ya think? This guy needs to sue the fucking Judge and court system. 14 years is worth a hell of a lot more than 2.5 million.	/r/MensRights	10/09/10 06:34 AM
0	Jennifer Aniston Says Dads Are Redundant Yeah, she displayed it too. Not too pretty for either of you.	/r/MensRights	09/08/10 09:02 AM
2	Jennifer Aniston Says Dads Are Redundant I have quite a few friends raised by single mothers, they're all doing fine. Also, your typical "stay in the kitchen" cracks undermine you more than Aniston's comments undermine her.	/r/MensRights	09/08/10 07:41 AM
1	The Flaw in Feminism This article reads like it was written by a man. Really, we can still practice every art, male/female, it doesn't matter. You don't need to have the uniformity of one sex always performing all of the same proscribed functions.	/r/MensRights	02/07/10 07:27 AM
1	Tiger Woods Divorce Settlement Near - Elin to get $750 Million Still stupid- what kind of lawyer is she buying with his money?	/r/MensRights	30/06/10 11:20 PM
8	So, I got slapped by a feminist. You did a good job of handling the situation. Here's some validation- there was nothing wrong with the flirting you were doing, that chick had no business interjecting, she committed assault and you should be commended for your restraint.	/r/MensRights	30/06/10 12:05 AM
4	The appellate court agreed it was "unfair for for him to suffer the stigmatization of being labeled a sex offender when his crime was not sexually motivated," however it sided they put him on the list anyway Putting him on a sex offender registry is overkill, but he was waaaay out of line grabbing a 14 year old, and the language he used was creepy.	/r/MensRights	29/06/10 08:41 AM
9	Tiger Woods Divorce Settlement Near - Elin to get $750 Million She gets 750 million for doing FUCK ALL? This is why our court system is ridiculous. This woman hasn't worked a fucking day in her life, she should be given $1,000 towards her first month's rent and a cab voucher.	/r/MensRights	29/06/10 03:31 AM
0	High school coach fired for sexting 20-year-old college girlfriend. met again, then /god how tiresome.	/r/MensRights	09/06/10 08:40 AM
1	High school coach fired for sexting 20-year-old college girlfriend. What if they met a couple years after graduation at a convention for kinksters with a teacher/student fetish? What then, huh? :D	/r/MensRights	09/06/10 03:08 AM
4	High school coach fired for sexting 20-year-old college girlfriend. Even if she was, I don't see a problem- she's an adult and no longer under his authority. Also, that scenario is pretty fucking hawt in my perverted estimation.	/r/MensRights	09/06/10 01:07 AM
1	The rape charge, I get that. . . but why aren't they both charged with "concealing the death of a child?" I disagree, this child was victimized for a year by someone who was much more mature, who definitely knew better. 13 year olds are impressionable and whether it was consensual or not, the child cannot be held to the same moral standards even as she's being taken advantage of. She needs therapy and better guidance, not punishment for being preyed upon.	/r/MensRights	08/06/10 10:24 PM
2	The rape charge, I get that. . . but why aren't they both charged with "concealing the death of a child?" But a person who breaks a law/rule while simultaneously being a victim of someone breaking a law/rule does not suddenly get a free pass for their actions. In cases like this there is almost always a power play happening where the child is coerced into the relationship- why else was it secret? This child was raped for a year, became pregnant, tried to give herself an abortion with a lead pencil, and spent several days ill and in pain before "giving birth". Don't you think she's been punished enou…	/r/MensRights	08/06/10 12:56 AM
12	The rape charge, I get that. . . but why aren't they both charged with "concealing the death of a child?" Because she is a CHILD who was RAPED, at least statutorily. Give me a fucking break.	/r/MensRights	07/06/10 09:00 PM
1	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." I switched from 3rd person to 2nd person in my commenting to expedite my argument- I was also having several simultaneous arguments going on at once, so I might have muddled them together. I meant no personal offense. If you have some personal issues that are relevant to your argument, I won't pry them out of you, but I will chide you for caring more about upvotes than your argument. CHIDE! :P And if my opinions are substandard to your tastes, and you'd prefer a "real feminist" take, go ahead an…	/r/MensRights	28/05/10 06:17 PM
1	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." The best case scenario is two parents who can afford it planning and then bringing a child into the world. After that, there are various scenarios in descending preference. One of those is a woman who can't afford a child but is bringing it into the world anyway, without its father's blessing. That is the situation we are talking about, and being a man in that situation, caring for your offspring is the most responsible thing that can be done. You're trying to draw pro-choice arguments into this…	/r/MensRights	28/05/10 05:45 AM
0	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." Sex may not be consent to procreation, but that is the main function of it, and why we are all here. What you're arguing for is the ability to have sex without being responsible for the very predictable consequences. Welcome to the 21st century indeed. ...try to get over your sexist and ultra-conservative beliefs. Um, did you read the username? Just because I disagree with you doesn't mean I'm sexist or conservative, you name-caller. I joined men's rights because I believe men do get fucked over…	/r/MensRights	28/05/10 03:48 AM
1	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." Logic works great for math and philosophy because you can take one element out of context, place it under a microscope and determine its validity. Since the very society that you are appealing to for equal rights is the same one you'll be screwing with your bastard children, I think it gets a say in the matter too, and guess who it very naturally favors? The right of the child. Your argument above attempts to smuggle in the notion that children have a right to some certain standard of living. I'…	/r/MensRights	28/05/10 03:38 AM
0	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." Don't forget that the woman has the financial problems WITH the pregnancy. And if someone thinks they can have sex with a woman with no strings attached, impregnate her and get off scot-free, then they are the ones that are idiotic. When women get pregnant their hormones change, their feelings can change. What then? Bully them into abortion? Walk away and say "your choice, not mine!" and abandon your child? I'm sorry, but your arguments seem to rationalize irresponsibility. If you don't want to …	/r/MensRights	28/05/10 03:30 AM
-1	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." Look, I'm having this conversation with 6 different ppl right now, and am really kind of bored with it. Bottom line: If you don't want to have a kid, get a vasectomy or don't have sex. Ta-da! You have a choice.	/r/MensRights	28/05/10 03:21 AM
2	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." Tricks the father? Oh that poor man, getting tricked to stick his dick in a chick. What a victim. Yes, there are shitty mothers in the world- does being a shitty father make it all even-steven? My arguments have been made with five other posters, feel free to read all of them here.	/r/MensRights	28/05/10 03:02 AM
2	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." So why should she be allowed to keep a child if she can't afford it? So if you lose your job, should you lose your kids too? As to your second argument, it really IS about the kids. Who is going to clothe them, feed them, pay for Dr. appts. etc.? If the woman can't, then our taxes will. Are you hiding behind a smokescreen of non-responsibility to get out of supporting a child that you were stupid enough to have with a woman you couldn't trust? Should the rest of society pay for your mistakes?	/r/MensRights	28/05/10 02:57 AM
1	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." Pretty funny, I was just reading this in another thread. It seemed appropriate for this one. I'm sick of arguing this point, because it's not really a debate for me, I already know I'm right. It takes two to tango and if you fuck a child into this world, you better take care of it or it will grow up to rightfully hate you for being a selfish prick	/r/MensRights	28/05/10 02:44 AM
0	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." The only way that works is if having sex = agreeing to have a child All men should know that sex very naturally leads to pregnancy and that this is always a possibility. No one is entitled to consequence free sex, so while it's not an agreement to have a child, it is certainly the way to go about it if you are trying for one. So, don't put your key in the ignition if you don't want the car to start. If she knows the father does not want the child, and goes ahead with it, how is that him being a …	/r/MensRights	28/05/10 02:11 AM
-3	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." Artificial insemination is a unique case, where access to the product is contingent upon non-liability of the sperm donor. In the far more common world of pregnancy occurring because of copulation, I hold that if you don't want to get burned, don't play with fire. You may think it's unjust that a man would have to pay for a child they didn't want, but how do you think the rest of society feels when they have to pick up the slack because that man felt he was entitled to sex without consequences? …	/r/MensRights	28/05/10 01:58 AM
-2	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." That's a rationalization. Rationalizations won't help a child who's 50% yours to make their way in the world. There are plenty of deadbeat fathers out there to back you up, but do you really want to be one of them?	/r/MensRights	28/05/10 01:07 AM
-2	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." It is a burden, one you should keep in mind when you decide to have sex. A woman can always change her mind, and it is not ethical to force someone to terminate a pregnancy. If she decides to keep it, it may suck for the guy, but there's no reason to make it suck for the kid too.	/r/MensRights	27/05/10 11:56 PM
-3	"Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it." On the other hand, women bear an unequal part in the reproductive process, so they should have unequal (privileged) rights when it comes to reproductive choice.	/r/MensRights	27/05/10 11:40 PM
1	When a woman says she was raped, I don't believe her. To summarize: "You're not the boss of me!" :D Fair enough. Turn your all-knowing skeptical eye onto the rape victim who just confided in you. Penetrate her with your long hard stare and ask her for the details. Judge her, judge her JUDGE HER! And if she actually was raped feel like an ass for the rest of your life.	/r/MensRights	17/05/10 02:35 AM
4	When a woman says she was raped, I don't believe her. Bullshit. When someone titles a post "When a woman says she was raped, I don't believe her." They are the misogynistic fucking cunt that needs to take a hard look at themselves, not me. It is YOU and the op who side with the accused perpetrators on the very low statistical chance that the victim is lying. It is not my reasoning that needs to be questioned, but your own faulty logic and masculine favoritism. Don't presume to lecture me kid, you are not qualified.	/r/MensRights	16/05/10 02:51 AM
5	When a woman says she was raped, I don't believe her. Bullshit. You can't hide behind logic when rape is involved. It's an emotional crime. And the fact that your sister was raped doesn't lend credence to your argument, it just makes you a douche for trying to use someone else's suffering as a way to try to make your point.	/r/MensRights	16/05/10 02:40 AM
5	When a woman says she was raped, I don't believe her. I call bullshit. Your gf comes to you crying that she was assaulted and raped, and you say, "Sorry honey, you could be lying through your teeth. My fraternity with a man I don't know that you are accusing of rape goes deeper than my affections and trust for you." Pull your fucking head out of your ass. This entire post is misogynistic bullshit and it's just this type of crap that makes r/MensRights a fucking JOKE.	/r/MensRights	14/05/10 08:30 PM
5	When a woman says she was raped, I don't believe her. MOST rapes go unreported. It takes a lot of courage for the victim to come forward. If you are the cop investigating, yes, you need to do your homework. If you are a loved one that the victim turned to, then you should withhold judgment and stand by the victim.	/r/MensRights	14/05/10 08:27 PM
4	When a woman says she was raped, I don't believe her. The crime is so serious that she must initially be believed. If she has no evidence, then that will come out eventually. But if your wife, gf, sister or mother were to come to you and confide in you, I sure as hell hope you'd be there for them and not assume they were trying to fuck someone over.	/r/MensRights	14/05/10 12:59 AM
-1	Threathing to kill sexists is funny, if the sexist is a man. If someone tried to make a slave of me, I'd kill them too.	/r/MensRights	12/05/10 08:12 AM
-1	Please tell your daughters never to hit boys (except in self-defense) as it would be exploitative of a double-standard and would thus be unsports[wo]manlike. Whoosh	/r/MensRights	07/05/10 09:34 AM
-1	Please tell your daughters never to hit boys (except in self-defense) as it would be exploitative of a double-standard and would thus be unsports[wo]manlike. Yeah, you got me, way to go bro.	/r/MensRights	07/05/10 07:56 AM
-2	Please tell your daughters never to hit boys (except in self-defense) as it would be exploitative of a double-standard and would thus be unsports[wo]manlike. Yeah, I totally bitch slapped this 10 year old kid to the ground when he gave me a titty twister. Then I stepped on a kitten that scratched me and threw a brick at this senile old man who bumped into me. Violence is always justified if it teaches those fuckers a lesson.	/r/MensRights	07/05/10 06:53 AM
-1	Please tell your daughters never to hit boys (except in self-defense) as it would be exploitative of a double-standard and would thus be unsports[wo]manlike. Yeah, you're right. I suppose if someone, say, an elderly person or child were to wrong me in some way, I'd be totally justified in using physical violence to get my point across. That's why I run over bicyclists that cut me off in my car.	/r/MensRights	07/05/10 06:21 AM
2	Please tell your daughters never to hit boys (except in self-defense) as it would be exploitative of a double-standard and would thus be unsports[wo]manlike. Not getting into an internet pissing contest, but seriously, your kind is a dime a dozen, and I have no respect for knuckleheads who rough up women. Sorry your precious nipple got tweaked you pathetic weenie.	/r/MensRights	06/05/10 07:38 AM
0	Please tell your daughters never to hit boys (except in self-defense) as it would be exploitative of a double-standard and would thus be unsports[wo]manlike. You.	/r/MensRights	06/05/10 07:37 AM
-3	Please tell your daughters never to hit boys (except in self-defense) as it would be exploitative of a double-standard and would thus be unsports[wo]manlike. So he should have grabbed her wrist when she went for him, pried her hand off, looked at her sternly and told her to leave him alone. Punching a drunk chick for tweaking your nipple so that she crumbles to the floor, is pure bully cowardice, and if I catch any motherfucker doing it in my presence, no matter how big they are, I'll bring them down even if I have to use a pipe wrench to do it. Just like when a dog bites a person or livestock gets aggressive, men who attack women need to be put in t…	/r/MensRights	06/05/10 07:35 AM
1	The reason men allowed feminism to progress is that alpha males are not harmed by feminism, and it is alpha males who have the power to grant women the privileges of feminism. Might does make right, but Social Darwinism is not Darwinism applied to society. It is another theory altogether, and people need to READ UP ON IT before they start arguing for it.	/r/MensRights	02/05/10 01:19 AM
4	The reason men allowed feminism to progress is that alpha males are not harmed by feminism, and it is alpha males who have the power to grant women the privileges of feminism. Nevertheless, Social Darwinism is not a scientific theory, has no basis in actuality, and the idea of it has been used to rationalize war, racism and genocide. If you want to champion it, go ahead, but it had its heyday back in 1930s Germany, so don't expect too many adherents to your myspace community. I get the idea you wouldn't be arguing this hard for most fascist social theories, but for a fundamental misunderstanding of the subject. To me it's a bit like you're saying you love the KKK's se…	/r/MensRights	01/05/10 02:37 AM
6	The reason men allowed feminism to progress is that alpha males are not harmed by feminism, and it is alpha males who have the power to grant women the privileges of feminism. There is a difference between Darwinism, the body of evidence and arguments for the transmutation of species, and Social Darwinism which, though it bares Darwin's name, has absolutely nothing to do with Darwin, and is only loosely, mistakenly based on his ideas of Natural Selection. Kind of like "Scientology" actually has nothing to do with science. Social Darwinism isn't so much a scientific idea, but an attempt to lend scientific credence to the idea that "Might makes right". It was championed…	/r/MensRights	01/05/10 02:05 AM
6	The reason men allowed feminism to progress is that alpha males are not harmed by feminism, and it is alpha males who have the power to grant women the privileges of feminism. In what way does Social Darwinism make sense? I think it oversimplifies, leads to bigoted ideas and lacks any scientific underpinning.	/r/MensRights	01/05/10 01:34 AM
19	The reason men allowed feminism to progress is that alpha males are not harmed by feminism, and it is alpha males who have the power to grant women the privileges of feminism. Two thoughts: 1) That writer has a slave mentality. 2) We really need to get rid of this "Alpha Male" idea. It has about as much scientific validity as Social Darwinism or Phrenology. It's adoption, expansion and overuse by the general public has created countless instances of bad science, and numerous excuses for bad behavior.	/r/MensRights	30/04/10 11:31 PM
1	Not re-posting this to start a fight, but hopefully to aid discussion. The feminisms sub-reddit is talking about the MensRights subreddit I think both sexes tend to see the grass greener on the other side of the fence. Women are coming out of a long dark history where they were treated like livestock, with about as many rights. I think the more they pull even, though, the more their arguments lose their edge. Men are suffering from the same phenomenon as "white guilt" being born to take up a mantle of oppressor and be targeted as such regardless of our own personal opinions and actions. But some men revel in this role. I think it'…	/r/MensRights	17/02/09 09:01 PM
7	Women are so much better than men at so many things Damn straight they are. Cooking, cleaning, changing diapers... Sorry, the headline pissed me off.	/r/MensRights	29/12/08 09:58 PM
5	DONT-CHEAT.COM "She bit off my penis." (sorry about thumbnails) So he basically rewards the bitch by "learning his lesson" and passing pics of his dick round the internet? How about he take her to court and she can go to jail, and then send him payments for the rest of her life? Oh, and that guy can't write worth a damn.	/r/MensRights	29/12/08 08:50 AM
-4	Soon soldiers discovered that most women couldn't throw a grenade beyond its bursting radius. This will make you unpopular on battlefields. I just want to say that I could kick that guy's ass. EDIT: Why the hate? He just spent a whole article saying he could kick your ass.	/r/MensRights	15/12/08 11:51 PM
0	Withholding Sex as a Form of Punishment Medical questions aside, if two people are no longer attracted to each other the relationship probably won't last. A woman who can't have sex can still get/give oral sex and handjobs.	/r/MensRights	12/12/08 07:33 PM
2	Withholding Sex as a Form of Punishment It's neglect, which is emotional and psychological abuse.	/r/MensRights	12/12/08 12:52 AM
3	Oregon Woman ran through her husband's retirement account to pay for Nigerian email scam Dear not retiring husband: Please consider divorce and lawsuit.	/r/MensRights	18/11/08 10:22 PM