TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

goinsouth85 Archive

View 1 posts and 1,044 comments by goinsouth85 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
467

Generalgoinsouth85/r/MensRights04/07/23 12:23 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,044 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I swear, that logic, or lack thereof, always cracks me up. The one upside of being an incel
/r/MensRights29/06/26 07:21 PM
7

Feminism is as much about equality as North Korea is a democratic republic of the Korean people.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 10:42 PM
8

And while she’s at it, look up the official name of North Korea. See? It democracy of the Korean people, iT’s LiTeRaLlY iN tHe NaMe!
/r/MensRights27/05/26 10:39 PM
4

From what I can tell from the article - it’s not the mother doing this, it’s the state of Kansas. Any time the mother files for welfare benefits, she assigns the child support to the government. The government is the one that establishes and/or enforces the child support against the father. It looks that’s what happened cause the article said that it was a government agency that was trying to have him declared the father.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 09:41 PM
9

Easiest thing you can do. Tell your father/brother/BF, husband, as the case may be, how happy you are to have them in your life. It may be the first compliment they’ve gotten in a while.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 07:01 AM
6

Texas is a good state for rich men but not a good state for poor fathers. The community property is split very similar to how the marital estate is split. It is unusual for either spouse to get more than 55%. It is very hard to get alimony. The standard is “minimum reasonable requirements” not accustomed standard of living. The absolute maximum alimony that can be awarded is $5000/month for ten years - that’s for a 30+ year marriage and cannot exceed 20% of the payers income. A person who gets c…
/r/MensRights29/01/26 05:57 AM
-1

That’s good to know. Some of things we read about that are supposedly happening in the UK are just unbelievable
/r/MensRights09/01/26 03:04 PM
31

But at the same time, you’ve got sharia courts and five time public prayer? WTF got poured into their drinking water
/r/MensRights09/01/26 01:09 PM
40

Keeping the pregnancy test with him to this day - heartbreaking
/r/MensRights16/12/25 04:10 AM
42

Did she forget when her contemporaries were going through their sleepless nights, feeding the baby for the third time? Did she “forget” when they were at the store with a toddler going through their terrible twos? Did she “forget” those endless hours doing hooked on phonics? Did she “Forget” dropping and picking up the kids from Kumon lessons? Soccer practice? Tae Kwon do? Did she “Forget” saving a kings ransom for college (ok, maybe not fair is she isn’t American). Did she forget the anxiety th…
/r/MensRights29/11/25 05:33 PM
10

I heard it one time - I told her “Even been hit in the face with a baseball bat? No you haven’t, have you? So don’t tell me how privileged I am when you don’t know the first thing about me.” Never heard it again.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 03:44 PM
1

The trust owns all the property and is run by people that are favorable to you. If set up right, since you don’t own or control the trust, the property cannot be taken in a divorce
/r/MensRights17/10/25 03:01 PM
7

You know the answer to this. First - the advice of someone who eavesdropped on you is inherently suspect. Secondly, unsolicited advice is inherently suspect. Third - you know this is highly manipulative behavior that you wouldn’t appreciate being on the receiving end of. Fourth - you’re his girlfriend and seem to be happy in this relationship, which means you must have been things right so far - why then would you change everything you’re doing? Yes - you have permission to follow your instincts…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 10:49 PM
10

Legend has it, she’ll still not resisting
/r/MensRights14/08/25 07:52 PM
3

What they call “toxic masculinity” is that it makes the world go round. We live in a universe with limited resources - some are going to get it, some will not. To get them - there is competition which you have to win. This is not limited to mating. In the capitalist marketplace, there is ruthless competition to win market share. In politics, it’s full on character assassination to win more votes. And here’s the kicker - most successful women are successful because they win competitions … until D…
/r/MensRights04/08/25 02:23 PM
20

At least most of them don’t agree, but that’s kind of a low bar.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:46 PM
42

Shit like this infuriates me. People that can’t be happy with the blessing God gave them don’t deserve to have kids. What matters is that they are healthy, and you raise them with love and care. And if you didn’t get your preferred gender, your kid will change your mind.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 07:13 AM
5

You still need to go to law school to be a lawyer. You need a teaching certificate to become teacher. The only thing you have to have a gender studies degree for is to teach gender studies.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 10:31 PM
47

And we’re sorry that you carry 2/3 of that $1.3T in student loan debts. We really thought that degree in woke studies was a great investment
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:44 PM
2

Here’s something small. Tell your dad, brother, boyfriend, or husband as the case may be, how grateful you are to have them in your life.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 03:51 AM
3

I’ve worked at law firms my entire career. Secretaries clearly prefer to work for male attorneys. Many secretaries have straight up told me that. I remember one time, our firm brought in the top attorney in her field. None of the secretaries wanted to work for her. None. We had to palm off our most junior secretary on her.
/r/MensRights19/04/25 01:26 PM
2

Does the level of their cruelty know any bounds?
/r/MensRights04/04/25 12:31 AM
2

Custodial interference. See for example Texas Penal Code, Section 25.03 (it’s a state jail felony). Most states have a similar statute and it is not “just a civil matter.”
/r/MensRights06/03/25 08:20 PM
7

Trump did surprisingly well with women but he didn’t win them. They went 53-46 for Harris https://apnews.com/article/election-harris-trump-women-latinos-black-voters-0f3fbda3362f3dcfe41aa6b858f22d12
/r/MensRights05/03/25 12:49 AM
3

If accurate statistics were kept on custodial interference, women would be found to commit the majority of crimes
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:55 PM
16

The liberals have completely fucked up this world
/r/MensRights07/01/25 12:27 AM
2

You can make it by passing a procedure where the false accuser can make a limited immunity statement that only be used to exonerate, but cannot be used for any other purpose. Most importantly - the immunity only applies to the statement itself, and the accuser can still be charged for crimes for the false accusation, except it has to be proven with other evidence. In that way - at the least, the wrongly accused can be exonerated, and the accuser does not make their situation any worse by doing t…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 07:00 PM
1

The problem with libel and slander in the United States is that these are expensive civil cases, and it is very likely that the false accuser has any assets to recover from ( the same is true for most private individuals). Additionally - statements that are made to a government investigative body are usually privileged from libel/slander (the sole remedy is perjury/filing a false police report). Since lawyers like to get paid, they are not going to take these cases on contingency fee. Hence, lib…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 06:51 PM
3

“Terrorism, not all Muslims, but always a Muslim”
/r/MensRights31/10/24 01:36 PM
1

“It’s only small around you”
/r/MensRights09/08/24 03:27 PM
10

USPTO statistics 90% of patents over the last 15 years have at least one male inventor. 22% have at least one female inventor (patents often have multiple inventors). The share of all inventors is about 7/8 are men, 1/8 are women. Also - of the largest companies > $100B in market cap, it looks like Cisco was the only one founded by a woman, sandy lerner, and she founded it with her husband. Thats not to say that no woman can make a great invention or found an impactful business. In fact, I don’t…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 04:10 PM
11

The best hope is with the United States Supreme Court. They ruled that affirmative action was unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment. I am hoping that they will make a similar ruling against DEI with regard to the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:03 PM
12

So then identify as a woman and … voila, you can attend
/r/MensRights22/04/24 03:21 PM
2

Yes. And so is more men going to college. Save for only a few specific degrees, most of college programs are useless
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:17 PM
6

Will they just move down the rim. It will make the game a lot more entertaining to watch
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:54 PM
1

Everyone here has made great points debunking this study. But I think y’all are missing the most important flaw. As an attorney - I can tell you, cases that are contested/go to trial are notoriously subject to selection bias. Saying that 64% of men who asked for custody got it is meaningless unless these cases have similar strengths/weaknesses with the cases at large. Otherwise, the 64% win rate is only arrived at because the cases that are contested are those with tilted fact patterns that comp…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 05:58 PM
2

As an attorney - this point cannot emphasized enough. Cases that go to trial are notoriously selection biased. People generally don’t blow tens of thousands of dollars taking to trial (or even advancing a case) a case that cannot be won. So the cases that go to trial are not a representative sample of all the cases. So it is not that “men don’t get custody because they don’t ask” - they don’t ask (and spend tens of thousands) because they don’t get.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 05:31 PM
3

Here’s what it says on the channel in YouTube: “A courtroom based tv show involving cases with issues related to child support/spousal support in Texas. All episodes include actors. Vonda Bailey is a newly elected judge. She is also a licensed attorney in the state of Texas who formally handled cases involving child support and spousal support. The cases are based on real life scenarios of events that occur in child support courts. Names, characters, businesses, places, events, locales, and inci…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:03 AM
4

Fake. Support Court is obviously paid actors/actresses.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:31 PM
2

I’ve worked a law firm my entire career. You might think that there’s some toxicity between lawyers, but we go nothing on the secretaries. Their cliques, pettiness, and rumor mongering is at a whole new level. But the ironic part is that when it comes to assignments, every last one of them wants a male boss. One time, we were able to get one of the best names in town to join us. But none of the secretaries wanted to work for her because she was a woman. She wound up getting paired with the most …
/r/MensRights10/03/24 07:40 PM
2

I’d rather die alone than deal with her.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 10:32 AM
2

And to add about Texas - even after ten years of marriage, alimony is still pretty hard, and when awarded, is much lower than other states. The standard in Texas is amount needed for “minimum reasonable requirements” (after making demonstrated attempts to get a job) not “accustomed standard of living” like in other states. It’s also capped and limited in duration. Source - attorney licensed in Texas
/r/MensRights24/02/24 11:36 AM
4

Thank you. For a second, I thinking “Misogynistic Language, number 4, kicking team. Half the distance to the goal line. Repeat 4th down.”
/r/MensRights04/02/24 04:51 PM
1

That’s awful. I’m really sorry to hear that. I hope things get better for you.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 02:45 AM
3

Honest questions, but is that level of condescension commonplace for those with disabilities? They are talking to you like a child.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 08:07 PM
6

Dammit - will they just move the rim down a foot! It would make the game a lot more entertaining to watch
/r/MensRights31/01/24 02:59 AM
5

And it’s a little more than that. Feminism cannot exist without simps and their resources. MGTOW reduces future simps which is the lifeblood of feminism.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 06:04 PM
3

I can’t wait till tonight. Her 15 minutes of fame will finally be over.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 04:12 PM
7

Simple - DEI don’t pay the bills. ROI does
/r/MensRights23/01/24 04:08 PM
1

And don’t forget - lower birth rate is very bad news for social security
/r/MensRights20/01/24 02:52 AM
1

How much money are we talking about? If we’re talking $50K - $500K a prenup If we’re talking $500K you may want to consider an irrevocable trust, either in South Dakota or Nevada. If were talking $2M or higher - there’s the trust in the Cook Islands See a lawyer in you area. If you go with a prenup, make sure to give her the money so she can hire an attorney to review the agreement and make sure it is at four months away from the wedding
/r/MensRights18/01/24 04:16 AM
1

Rumor has it, she still needs to get to work
/r/MensRights16/01/24 11:36 AM
23

Not sure which country you are in. If the United States, (1) Hire an attorney, and (2) do not talk to anyone about this - if the school or police try to ask you, tell them that you will not answer questions without your lawyer present.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 11:05 PM
6

Congratulations to her on her well deserved award.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:26 PM
4

Who is the LNP?
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:21 PM
40

Or maybe if the sanitation workers, who I’ll guess are at least 90% men, went on strike in her city.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 02:52 PM
25

But when it comes time to be a man, they go full tradcon
/r/MensRights29/12/23 09:16 AM
2

File this one under never stick your dick inside of crazy!
/r/MensRights29/12/23 12:14 AM
2

Oh man, I see one professor that’s fixing to get canceled.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 06:58 PM
6

On the one hand Reddit is all about cancelling student loans and medical debt, but goes full Ben Shapiro when it comes to child support.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 06:31 PM
5

It is under the conspirator rule, but it is a moot point. Most of the time, prosecutors don’t want to confuse the jury by explaining all of this, when some form of aggravated conspiracy to commit capital murder is very likely gonna get a life sentence.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 05:43 PM
5

dude on the right went full gangsta mode!
/r/MensRights22/12/23 05:28 AM
9

Now that’s what I call a strong, independent woman.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 01:19 AM
1

Anything catch the guys name? More seriously, the cops weren’t perfect. But it was one of the better responses I’ve seen. They did seem to take Austin’s safety seriously. But, they wouldn’t have let a man have as much latitude as they let her have. I really hope that at least one of the conditions of her release are a no contact order.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 07:51 AM
1

Apparently California is one the few states where this is true. From the article: “I have to be able to prove that they knew your age,” Amador [the prosecutor] told her. Amador said that a witness who was in the house gave a statement saying the woman told people at the party she was 18. Amador also noted that a video from a different party from back then showed the woman saying she was 18, suggesting it would be hard to prove that people should have known she was 18
/r/MensRights15/12/23 05:53 PM
5

Chris Christie calling Ramaswamy a “blowhard” should get a pot and kettle award.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 05:24 PM
2

Fellow lawyer here. God I hate it too.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 05:46 PM
7

I didn’t say it was “reasonable and justified”, I said it was “reasonable and justified SELF DEFENSE based on the facts known to him at the time” Why would it be unfortunate if a tourist gets gored by the wild Buffalo after being told not to? If they deserved it, it would be fortunate, right?
/r/MensRights04/12/23 02:33 AM
1

I think you’re going too far. I would not say he “deserved” it. I’d say that it was reasonable and justifiable self defense, based on the facts known to him at the time. But to say he deserved it too harsh
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:40 PM
3

Don’t bother - that’s almost three hours of your life you will never get back. It was way longer than it needed to be. Even if it was an hour shorter, it would be a slightly better than average story.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 04:31 AM
3

Iirc Obama won it in his first month in office
/r/MensRights24/11/23 09:31 PM
13

Watch the link. In fact, I think that school should watch it too, because I think that is exactly what the school is doing, except they omit the second day. And then they wonder why boys do so poorly.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:54 PM
48

When I see this, I am reminded about demonstration a teacher did in the last 60s. The first day she told the class that blue eyed people were superior and treated them better. And in most of the competitions at the end of the day, the blues eyed students won. The next day, she did the exact opposite, saying that the brown eyed students were superior, and in the same competition, the brown eyed students won. She then explained that eye color has nothing to do with anything but how damaging discri…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 06:58 AM
1

I wouldn’t read too much into that “said/done” remark. She’s a politician who will say what she needs to get what she wants. They all do. The feminists will never get past her position on abortion. That said, there are plenty of other reasons not to like her
/r/MensRights01/11/23 02:44 PM
1

Update - judicial immunity was denied in a civil suit and yesterday, the 4th court of appeals affirmed.
/r/Divorce_Men31/10/23 05:01 PM
1

It’s likely attempted murder
/r/MensRights30/10/23 05:04 PM
3

So that sounds like a head tax. Considering that 40% of Americans don’t pay any income tax, a lot of them are going to get hit hard. That 40% may have a higher percent of women, but will include a lot men as well.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 02:40 AM
56

That whole dumpster fire of a thread can be summed up as “I gave birth. I face misogyny. Now give me the gold at ft Knox. I earned it.”
/r/MensRights19/10/23 07:56 AM
30

In fact - sometimes they don’t even care which man gave the child support fluid
/r/MensRights18/10/23 08:10 PM
1

What did he go down for?
/r/MensRights17/10/23 12:30 AM
21

Is there a type of imprisonment that is not rigorous?
/r/MensRights16/10/23 03:31 PM
22

In the United States - I think there is a good chance, mainly because it is explicitly gendered and would likely run afoul the 14th amendment. Also - if it is actual policy, it will open up jurisdictions to Monell claims. That said - it is more likely to remain a de facto policy, or even worse, be reincarnated into a version that has gender neutral language, but almost always has the same result
/r/MensRights11/10/23 05:45 PM
1

You don’t “press” criminal charges, and you don’t “pursue” criminal charges. That is the sole discretion of the prosecutors office, aka the District Attorney or County Attorney. As for civil defamation, he did bring a case and after some time dropped it and with an arguably good reason. Even with a slam dunk case and damages, it is very likely that Linsey Hill had almost no assets that would cover the judgment. So he could have incurred millions in attorneys fees to get a verdict that, and $5, p…
/r/MensRights11/10/23 05:25 AM
7

It was in the UK.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 08:16 AM
2

Chicagoland or NY?
/r/MensRights10/10/23 02:21 AM
7

With that logic, everyone should be thankful for men because that’s why they exist.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 01:31 PM
3

The same way black Africans were treated in South Africa’s apartheid system
/r/MensRights08/10/23 01:26 PM
4

Maybe.a better thing to say is that the fetus is life worthy of some legal protection, but the mothers right to her uterus is a greater right. That way - an abortion can be justified, but anyone else catches a manslaughter charge. But then that raises other issues - like if the fetus is viable outside the womb
/r/MensRights07/10/23 10:16 PM
5

And in America - don’t forget the health insurance.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 09:00 PM
2

Absolute dumbest case I’ve ever heard. The judge is a walking justification for why Canada should have a 2A.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 03:07 PM
7

Family law court is where common sense, justice, logic, and pretty much all rationale thought comes to die.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 03:01 PM
1

With a chainsaw.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 02:59 PM
2

Family court is where logic, justice, and common sense comes to die.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 02:47 PM
5

That canard about most custody cases aren’t decided by a judge, and small percentage that do (usually around 5%) the father wins 50% of the time. So therefore - when fathers fight for custody they win half the time. As a lawyer, that absolutely makes e cringe. Any time a settlement offer is made, the most important question to ask is, “or else what?” So even though judge didn’t actually decide the outcome, their tendencies and biases are extremely relevant. And drawing conclusions from the cases…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 04:48 AM
68

I have (grown up) children. My wife was like minded. In fact she wanted them sooner. Why on earth would I care if some woman I don’t know didn’t want kids? You do you. I have no idea why women think men want to force them to have kids. Another thing, we also dont want to force women to be housewives. Making a living is tough - it’s a helluva lot easier with two incomes
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:35 AM
2

Any court can strike it down - it doesn’t have to be the SCOTUS.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:24 AM
7

There’s a chance that this will be held to be unconstitutional because the protections are content based. The case to look at is RAV v City of St Paul. In particular, “Thus, the government may proscribe libel; but it may not make the further content discrimination of proscribing only libel critical of the government.” Similarly, California can award punitive damages for unsuccessful defamation cases but cannot make the further content discrimination by providing it only for claims of SA
/r/MensRights29/09/23 02:09 AM
9

Sadly, it doesn’t boggle my mind at all. It’s really very simple - we are not human to them. That makes collateral damage easy to defend.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 03:51 PM
39

The impact of this decision is going to be huge. Basically, if you want quasi judicial immunity, you need to have certain elements of due process - cross examination, right to counsel, right to bring witnesses. It was a unanimous opinion by a rather liberal Connecticut Supreme Court
/r/MensRights28/09/23 02:14 PM
5

This really is a slippery slope and one of the rare instances where it is not a fallacy
/r/MensRights27/09/23 08:06 PM
5

“Batikhäxor” That’s a good one!
/r/MensRights26/09/23 08:42 AM
4

Saying that a man who doesn’t go to court doesn’t want custody is like saying an insurance company pays a settlement doesn’t like money
/r/MensRights22/09/23 01:21 AM
51

Easiest thing - just tell their father, son, brother, husband, or boyfriend, as the case may be, how much they are appreciated
/r/MensRights13/09/23 08:22 PM
1

How’s that different from child support and alimony?
/r/MensRights31/08/23 03:43 PM
1

(1) get a local lawyer. (2) never take legal advice from an adversary (3) do not move out of the house - unless and until your lawyer advises you to. I’m licensed in a different state, but generally speaking in most no-fault divorce states, your adultery would have minimal if any impact on the outcome. I’ve heard that even in states that it is considered a factor in splitting the assets, it is becoming a smaller factor. Your wife is just wrong about the house - it’s a marital asset, and subject …
/r/MensRights30/08/23 07:34 PM
6

How dare you use math. Don’t you know that math is racist.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 10:45 AM
8

But whatever the hell you do, use protection
/r/MensRights29/08/23 04:05 AM
4

Remember if x > y, then x= infinity, and y=0
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/23 01:52 AM
22

Feminists will hate her more than anyone, just for being pro-life.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 09:37 PM
6

I don’t think we can generalize.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 09:46 AM
1

TBF - it was a letter from the defense attorney trying to persuade the prosecutors to drop the charges. I mean - he’s got to convince them that it’s in their best interests.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 03:46 PM
41

Norah Vincent. It was a hell of a story.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 01:46 PM
11

Notice that her study includes the use of novices. I’d be curious how well it is used by people who actually know how to use one. Of course, the real equalizer is the gun.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/23 01:39 PM
2

There’s a way to avoid this. Allow the accuser to make a rescinding statement that can only used by the accused in the original SA case, but which cannot be used against them in a perjury trial. The important thing is that the accuser can still be prosecuted for making the false accusation, but only if there is other evidence (besides the accused’s statement) that proves the accusation was false.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:59 PM
4

I’m sure they’ll give her a stern talking to.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:44 PM
1

I have worked at law forms my entire career. You might think that the lawyers are the most toxic people at the firm, and if you did, you’d be wrong. We lawyers got NOTHING on the secretaries (who are 99.99% women) and paralegals (who are about 90% women). The degree of pettiness with these ladies is just through the roof. Want to know the most ironic part? They almost always want male bosses. I remember one time, our firm managed to get a female lawyer who was a real superstar in her field. Emba…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 12:53 PM
20

It masquerades as an intellectual wing promulgating peer reviewed studies. But in reality - it is a giant circle jerk that uses mafia tactics to silence opposition. I am so glad to see someone giving them a taste of their own medicine.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 09:17 PM
3

Lol! r/TIL I’m white
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:11 PM
32

“simply playing games” Lol! That’s rich coming from a child support officer.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 05:23 PM
6

Leaving the country is pretty easy to do. The hard part is making a life for yourself in another country. Your first problem is not extradition - its deportation. Most countries are not cool with someone you just showing up and deciding to reside there. You’ll need a way to get legal residence - and most legal residence involves bringing lots of money with you. Then your going to need a source of income for your living expenses. Again, most countries are not cool with you taking a job which coul…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:36 AM
32

It’s tough to win an argument with a smart person. It’s impossible to win an argument with an idiot.
/r/AntiFeminists10/08/23 11:30 PM
6

You see - men know to watch themselves because there is thing called consequences. Disrespect someone and you will get a beat down. Women get away with all sorts of stuff. She can call a man a “bitch” and he’s not gonna do anything to her. Along comes a cop. Woman thinks she can get away with all the shit she’s gotten away with, cause “you wouldn’t hit a ‘lady’”. But a cop would - and think nothing of it. Then when does, the woman screams, but none of the white knights are gonna take on a cops. …
/r/MensRights10/08/23 06:37 PM
6

Very much agreed. He gave them justification as he approached the door. And if they had tased him then, it would have been justified. But they didn’t, and he calmed down. At the time they tased him, it was not justified. There is no nunc pro tunc for the use of force.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 06:25 PM
111

But … she has to go to work. She has to go to work. SHE HAS TO GO TO WORK SHE.HAS.TO.GO.TO.WORK
/r/MensRights10/08/23 01:55 PM
29

No-fault divorce was introduced to America by California in the late 60s and quickly swept the nation within the next 20 years. Later in his life, the then-governor Ronald Reagan would tell his son it was one of the worst mistakes of his political career.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 08:56 PM
2

Nah - it’s you ears you have to worry about. Just listen with the volume low.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 08:08 PM
3

But … she has to go to work! She has to go to work. SHE HAS TO GO TO WORK!
/r/MensRights06/08/23 08:02 PM
4

WTAF - she withdrew early from the 401k? She only had to wait till she was 55.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 05:43 AM
1

TBF, it is free advertising. Maybe the Streisand effect may cause a few to go out and find out about the movie. If they see it for themselves, they will see it if any but
/r/MensRights05/08/23 08:54 PM
1

It’s not just that, but America has a constitution that is EXCEPTIONALLY hard to amend. So once the SCOTUS says “no,” for all intents and purposes, it’s game over
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:56 PM
20

And in other news, water makes things wet
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:54 AM
4

Judge Jeremy Jenkins needs to be removed from the bench.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:53 PM
2

It is feminist propaganda. When women kill their partner, it is almost always premeditated, which is murder, or sometimes known as murder, by lying in wait. When men kill their partner, it is often heat of the moment, which is some form of voluntary manslaughter, or a lesser degree of murder. Murder, while lying in wait, is the most serious level. Odd that the article doesn’t mention that fact. Why I would almost think they have an agenda!
/r/MensRights02/08/23 10:11 AM
9

She lost and lost her appeal a few months ago. https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/OpinionsWeb/processWebInputExternal.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2023/D03-14/C:21-3373:J:Hamilton:aut:T:fnOp:N:3016080:S:0
/r/MensRights02/08/23 12:07 AM
3

Better Call Saul!
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/23 04:19 PM
13

So what happened, hung jury?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:09 PM
111

That’s legally accurate, but in practice it’s different. Not sure how it is in the UK, but I can tell you - as a lawyer, I can tell you that in most of the United States, most jurors have “must be guilty of something cause they got arrested” attitude. An acquittal at trial takes a monumental effort with overwhelming evidence of innocence. So yeah - if they got acquitted, I’m inclined to think they are innocent.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:27 PM
15

Lol! While the ladies in Barbie are jumping from fairy tale land to shadow boxing the non-existent patriarchy, the men on Oppenheimer are busy splitting atoms and then discussing the ethical implications of what they’ve found.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:30 PM
17

Which - unless they are 80, they never experienced - I went to school in the late 70s and early 80s - even back then, the teachers were all women.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:13 PM
157

Yikes! And I thought we had it bad in America
/r/MensRights26/07/23 05:10 AM
147

What country are you in?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:58 AM
25

Common - don’t you know, women are always lose the most in wars ………/s
/r/MensRights25/07/23 11:52 PM
2

I have never had such an overwhelming desire to visit a Florida Walmart or a Waffle House!
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:06 PM
20

Good luck to them with that. It passed the Florida House by a vote of 102-12 and the Senate, 34-6. I’ll go out on a limb and assume there are at least 30 Democrats in the house and 15 in the senate - so even among them it would have at least 60%.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 09:25 PM
47

Is it just me, or does she look like she is wearing a prison jump suit?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 02:40 PM
13

Not just that - but if he could break his cuffs off and then grab a gun, wouldn’t he just off the lady with the gun instead of taking the other one hostage?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 02:37 PM
3

Not gonna lie - There was a time - like 20 years ago. Morris Dees famously sued Aryan Nations for the conduct of their member, got a $10M verdict. He then got the seized the land that their compound was on, and burned their buildings to the ground. But it’s been a very different story in the last 10 years. They’ve become infested with ultra leftists.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 06:25 PM
2

Ain’t it strange how straight some straight up socialists with regards to food, water, shelter, go full Ben Shapiro when it comes to the need for companionship.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 11:39 AM
9

Fair point. One thing is for sure, the dad who got custody is an order of magnitude better parent than the mother, otherwise he wouldn’t have won custody. So it could either be that the dad was super dad, or the dad was average and the mother is a fucking psycho.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 04:31 AM
16

In fairness, there may be some selection bias. When I see a single dad, the first questions that comes to mind is - how the hell did this guy convince a family court to give him custody? He must be super dad. So - it could be that the single dads with custody are not representative.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 03:53 AM
10

You know the beginning of the movie? Think family court judge.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 06:05 AM
9

They can’t see the injustice. Notice in their entire comment, it was all about “her” difficulties - not even a word about the husband. Forget about the fact that he is now a slave doing back breaking labor, but Heaven forbid she break one of her nails getting a job. Men are not human to these people.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 05:48 AM
31

And most of the time, these people are demanding that student loans and medical debts be forgiven - not that those are fair, either - but oh the hypocrisy
/r/MensRights15/07/23 05:37 AM
2

It’s a moot point because the accusers are most likely judgment proof.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 07:05 PM
13

Lol! I’m sure every dime of it is going to support the children /s
/r/MensRights14/07/23 03:16 PM
3

Lol! They been getting pussy passes their entire life. They Couldn’t imagine that the cops would actually use force on them.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 09:10 AM
260

The only thing feminists hate more than men are women who don’t tow their line
/r/MensRights11/07/23 09:36 PM
8

Bergen County?
/r/MensRights11/07/23 04:45 PM
18

The Sacramento county family court is one of the most corrupt courts imaginable. I’m sorry to hear this - Thank you for your service but you fought the wrong enemy.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 02:54 AM
17

This is an exceptionally badly thought out idea. If banks can unilaterally freeze funds - without legal process, through completely opaque criteria - well then it’s not really your money when you deposit it. But what if anything is the purpose of a bank if not “as reliable as cash and safer” ?
/r/MensRights10/07/23 09:12 PM
3

I have never had such an overwhelming urge to visit a Walmart or a diner in Florida
/r/MensRights09/07/23 06:39 AM
1

I swear - I have never wanted to go to a Walmart or a diner in Florida so badly
/r/MensRights08/07/23 02:11 AM
17

I didn’t get called an “incel”, but was told to “enjoy your life being single, wondering why women aren’t interested in you” during an argument about alimony. Seriously - that were true, alimony is the one thing I wouldn’t have to worry about. It’s like being called poor by the IRS
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:52 AM
3

God - I’d say you’d be more of an incel/neckbeard if you DID wear female perfume. Your “friend” is a moron and I hope you cut ties with her.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 01:49 PM
3

It actually amuses me. I mean, I was talking about an issue about family court. It’s kind of like the IRS calling you poor.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 12:25 PM
1

While I think this kind of name calling is awful, I think attaching legal liability is going too far. Im an attorney, and in the United States there wouldn’t be either civil or criminal liability from the mere use of the word “incel” or “neckbeard.” It’s rhetorical hyperbole. Additionally, if done on a platform like this where our identities are anonymous, there wouldn’t be any actual damages to reputation
/r/MensRights05/07/23 12:17 PM
3

Yes - that’s an apt analogy!
/r/MensRights04/07/23 08:19 PM
5

Not sure if I agree with. They also care about money - especially other people’s money
/r/MensRights04/07/23 08:15 PM
6

Good for you! No grandkids here … yet. But waiting. I started taking an interest in men’s right as my sons were getting older and seeing the kind of world they were entering.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 08:13 PM
3

But even that insinuation is silly. If it were true - why I care about alimony reform? It’s not like I’d have a dog in the fight.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 07:32 PM
2

I refuse to stoop to that level.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 07:30 PM
8

I get ad hominem attacks - those are as old as time. What I don’t get is the specific one leveled at me. I mean - if I’m arguing about the finer points about alimony reform, wouldn’t you think that I obviously had a dog in the fight? And if I had a dog in the fight - about alimony - by definition, I cannot possibly be enjoying my single life wondering why women aren’t interested in me. Wouldn’t something like “with that attitude, I can see why your ex left you for the pool boy” be an infinitely …
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:57 PM
-1

Clonazapam
/r/MensRights04/07/23 05:20 PM
8

Nah - I won’t go down to their level.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 04:24 PM
5

That’s what I did - my response was something like “Ah yes - when all else fails, go for the good old ad hominem”.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:29 PM
12

Kafque would be proud! Very insightful. Thanks.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 02:04 PM
56

But wouldn’t, “I feel sorry for your wife/girlfriend” or “No wonder your ex is your ex” be a more logical insult
/r/MensRights04/07/23 01:06 PM
25

New Jersey used to have an almost identical system and made almost identical changes in 2014. And there were similar hysterical prophecies. None of them happened.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 05:47 AM
4

I meant to respond to the parent comment. Just find it ironic that this article criticizing Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Mush will be disseminated heavily on twitter and Facebook.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 04:01 AM
3

The real irony is when they talk about on Facebook and twitter
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:22 AM
2

Sure - enjoy your glass of copium, and muse over your great contribution to humanity, some article about uselessness of men that surely be passed around Facebook and Twitter, while you drive yourself home in your Tesla
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:20 AM
3

Just had an argument at another sub. Wasn’t long before she played the incel card. I mean - of I was an incel, why would I care about alimony - I’d never have the “honor” of paying it
/r/MensRights02/07/23 11:23 PM
4

Theirs is hers, His is hers, and hers is hers.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 05:00 AM
11

This may sound cold, but I actually have no problem watching these people who spend years living off of other people’ money, bus tables at a diner or hand out smiles at Walmart - you, know, kind of like how a lot of America gets by.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 04:41 AM
12

The empathy gap on full display.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 01:21 AM
29

I’m sure we’re gonna see lots of “strong independent women “ /s
/r/MensRights01/07/23 08:00 PM
467

“‘On behalf of the thousands of women who our group represents, we are very disappointed in the governor's decision to sign the alimony-reform bill. We believe by signing it, he has put older women in a situation which will cause financial devastation. The so-called party of 'family values' has just contributed to erosion of the institution of marriage in Florida," Jan Killilea, a 63-year-old Boca Raton woman who founded the group a decade ago, told The News Service of Florida in a text message …
/r/MensRights01/07/23 03:56 PM
2

And this is why I’m glad that the 1st Amendment even allows hate speech. Because hate speech laws will inevitably protect some groups and not others - just look at how private businesses arbitrarily apply “hate speech” in their terms and conditions
/r/MensRights30/06/23 02:01 PM
2

It may be legal, as in you won’t go to jail - but expect twitter and every social media platform to kick you off
/r/MensRights30/06/23 01:56 PM
3

SJW are the worst hypocrites. I’m no police apologist, either - but watching that clip - where’s police brutality when you need it?
/r/MensRights30/06/23 01:53 PM
3

Hate speech is not a crime in the United States because of the 1st amendment. “Kill all men” or a similar statement about women would be too vague to constitute a true threat nor would it have the imminence of lawlessness necessary under Brandenburg v Ohio.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 09:29 PM
5

Yes - they have to break BOTH your legs. They are then extended 1mm a day. So it takes about 2 months of lengthening to get 2.5”. When you add healing, your talking about there four months of being in a wheel chair. Not the same as breast implants.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 03:24 AM
1

A modest proposal - nobody should hit anybody.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 10:51 PM
8

So in 5 years of online dating, you had 7 or 8 dates?
/r/MensRights22/06/23 09:28 PM
1

What state are you in?
/r/MensRights22/06/23 09:24 PM
4

Most states have guidelines for support based on income. She can ask for whatever she wants - that doesn’t mean she gets it. Also, consider stopping all payments to her from now. If she wants child support - then that’s ALL she gets and nothing more. And if you do pay for anything - pay by check.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 08:28 PM
1

I am not to familiar with this - but do people post anonymously? Because the one thing about a counter notice is that the person who posted the picture will have to divulge their identity.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 08:55 PM
1

362,880
/r/AntiFeminists16/06/23 05:28 AM
232

Man is Successful = Privileged
/r/MensRights14/06/23 11:53 AM
2

believeallwomen …. #excepther
/r/MensRights10/06/23 05:56 PM
2

There is only a tax reduction of the wife has very low earnings. If the wife has about the same, then there is no savings If you make $100,000, claim the standard exemption, US income tax is about $14,700. Married filing joint (wife makes 0) is $8400. But if both are making $100,000 (total income $200,000) then income tax is $29000 or 2X income tax for single person making $100,000.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 05:46 PM
5

I am a US patent attorney and would estimate that I have ushered at least 1000 patent applications through the PTO. The idea that the process is sexist or racist is absolutely laughable! The process is far too dry. Everything is done on paper. After the application is prepared, the inventor’s involvement is nil and their name is soon forgotten. Give me the name of an inventor and it means nothing to me or an Examiner. But give us a file number, and we all have a photographic memory.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 03:49 AM
11

Or Identify as a woman.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 09:39 PM
1

What state are you in?
/r/MensRights06/06/23 06:44 AM
3

The Supreme Court does not pass laws. Congress and the state legislatures do. In the Dobbs decision (overturning Roe v Wade) they only held that there was no constitutional right to an abortion. The states legislatures still have/had to pass laws banning abortions. Also, the SCOTUS is 5/4 men/women.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:25 PM
2

Let’s go Brandon!
/r/MensRights25/05/23 11:18 PM
36

Your still still gonna need an egg.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 12:02 AM
1

They always do. They are way overworked. The last thing they want is a speedy trial.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 07:59 PM
1

I was gonna to say something similar. From what you are saying, it would stand to reason that perhaps would baby momma wants the child support, not your daughter. An arrangement where your daughter stays with you, but momma still gets her child support, would be economically beneficial to her because she won’t have to spend the child support on your daughter, and your daughter gets to stay with you. Don’t know if this cold or would work - just trying to think outside the box.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 02:57 PM
3

Here’s a study that is far more meaningful. “The study, which was an effort to address gender bias in one particular state, was focused on over 500 judges in the state’s court system.” “The judges and lay people also analyzed two mock court cases, including a child custody case and a sex discrimination lawsuit.” “In the custody case, the parents were both seeking primary custody of their two children. The mother and father both worked full-time jobs and had an equal amount of conflicts with cari…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 05:55 AM
4

The 60% statistic is true, but meaningless. There is enormous selection bias in custody cases that go to trial. If the judge is known to have a bias towards the mother, only cases that have fact patterns that are lopsidedly favorable to the father will go to trial, and of course the outcome will be around 50/50, but so what?
/r/MensRights20/05/23 03:56 AM
216

And five years from now, he’ll be paying child support.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 08:04 PM
8

Got a great joke for you. Cop pulls over a woman and is about to issue a citation. Woman tells cop that, as per the police chief, the department has a policy of not giving tickets to pretty women. Cop says he’s never heard of it and the two argue. Finally the cop agrees to check. Goes back to his car. Comes back, “ma’am, please accept my humble apologies. I just talked to my sarge and he confirmed, it is indeed the policy of our department to not give pretty women tickets.” Pauses, tears out the…
/r/MensRights19/05/23 07:19 PM
107

When I hear the kind of things women do in family court, I start to wonder, was there really a serpent?
/r/MensRights19/05/23 06:23 PM
39

To answer your question - they are in disbelief that a man would ever strike them. But the police don’t give a fuck. The same song and dance that works for other men doesn’t work with the cops. She is no where near as delusional as sovereign cit lady.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 01:27 PM
5

You know the most ironic thing? “Incel” is used as an insult for most of us on this sub. But, most of our problems, e.g., divorce rape, false accusations, child support, began the day we lost that status. Seriously, if you want sex, get snipped and go to a prostitute. It is nowhere near as expensive as the “free” kind.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 02:55 PM
120

Used to think that they were for equality. Found out they were really for cutting down men.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 01:27 PM
1

Ngl - you had me for a sec
/r/MensRights11/05/23 04:33 PM
41

Temporarily muted and not permanently banned? You need to step up your game, bro!
/r/MensRights11/05/23 04:11 AM
2

The good old Cook Islands and the Nevis and St Kitts - you better be north of $1M. They are expensive and a tax nightmare. But they are the gold standard for asset protection.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 01:28 AM
2

But you get to pick the state. Nevada and South Dakota are very popular. You don’t have to be a resident to have your trust based there.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 01:14 AM
2

As with every legal question, it depends. If you have $250K in passive investments, a trust is the way to go. Less than $250K - it’s probably not worth the expense. On the other hand, if your capital is tied up in a business then a prenup is the way to go, because it is impractical for you run it while it is in the hands of trustees. Obviously - this is not a DIY thing!
/r/MensRights11/05/23 01:07 AM
2

If the trust is irrevocable - then nobody owns it. The trustees control it for the benefit of the beneficiaries. In a trust, like a spendthrift trust, the beneficiary status cannot be taken away because the beneficiary is who the TRUST recognizes as the beneficiary. Source: Lawyer and a trust protector
/r/MensRights11/05/23 12:56 AM
1

And can you imagine if it targeted women of a country focused on by passport bros (I’m not going to name it). It would actually help a lot of men. And the feminists would have a FULL MELTDOWN.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:58 PM
10

It’s not going to pass. This is just political grandstanding - attempting make a parody of the Texas law that created a civil case for aiding an abortion
/r/MensRights09/05/23 03:19 PM
0

I’m telling you, the direction this going to go is guys starting up a site called “did we fuck the same girl” where the texts you said you (assuming they don’t constitute revenge porn) have and other sexcapades will be published in all their glory.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 11:36 PM
1

Probably not - first of all, there is a specific provision of the law that prevents you from suing Facebook for defamation. Which leaves you with the actual posters. Most individual people do not have assets that make a defamation case worth pursuing. Defamation cases are not something you can DIY. Your gonna need a lawyer and it won’t be cheap. Edit - to clarify, it may be “worth it” to clear your good name, but the lawsuit won’t net you money and will require you to put up a pretty large retai…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 11:26 PM
3

The only thing that’s keeping the American population from dropping is immigration. Japans population has dropped over the last 20 years
/r/MensRights06/05/23 02:03 PM
3

This is very true. Housing costs for a couple are nowhere near the housing cost for two single people
/r/MensRights06/05/23 01:41 PM
1

That’s really sad.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 12:03 AM
5

Even doing up the chain of command won’t get you far. IIRC in El Paso, it was actual policy not to refer the (usually) father to enforce the decision in court. Hell - there is even a YouTube video of a court session where the father was a Houston Police Officer that was denied visitation. It’s by The Lead Attorney if you want to see it.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 09:16 PM
9

In most states it is a crime for custodial parent to withhold visitation. In Texas, it’s even a felony under Texas Penal Code 25.03. Here is the problem - the police refuse to make arrests, and often times won’t even make a police report. I believe there have only been maybe 20 prosecutions in the entire state of Texas in the past few years.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 08:20 PM
28

The domestic violence industry is the money making arm of feminism. It HAS to be gendered for there to be a nexus with feminism. So feminists will defend that lie at all costs.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 05:13 PM
8

It’s a moot point. Regardless of whether a trans man is a man, if they appear like a man, they will suffer most, if not all of the same discrimination that we talk about here. So welcome to club. The admission card to the Thursday’s patriarch meeting is in the envelope. Please remember the secret handshake we discussed earlier.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:06 PM
1

The Salvation Army is always a good place to start. Edison - are you immigrating from India?
/r/MensRights02/05/23 07:07 PM
2

There are a lot of other things you can do. Volunteer at a soup kitchen or a food pantry for example. Your father would not have to worry about enlistment (in the United States) as the current maximum age is 26. In fact, at 50, he wouldn’t even be join the military if he wanted to. When I was in my late 30s, I wanted to get a job as a military attorney - they wouldn’t let me.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 06:44 PM
4

If you are a woman, you can always tell your (as applicable) husband/BF, son, brother, or father how much you appreciate them. You’ll make their day.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 06:24 PM
32

Responsibility
/r/MensRights29/04/23 11:46 PM
4

They’re probably also missing the alpacas.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 06:26 PM
10

Just an aside - but all three female Prime Ministers were Tory. Not one was labour.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 04:25 PM
3

This won’t get you compensation, but it might get some justice. Make sure your health insurance claim forms state why the injuries were caused by her. Health insurance policies have a thing called subrogation that gives them a right to recover the money they paid to cover your medical bills when your injuries were caused by someone else’s wrong doing. They are in a much better position to go after her.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:30 PM
2

“Who set that system up?” asked the 40ish woman to the teenage boy.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 02:59 AM
2

It’s doubtful that you can protect assets accumulated during marriage from your spouse. However, inheritances and assets accumulated prior to marriage can be protected using asset protection trusts. But these are expensive to set up and administer. Unless you are talking at least $500K, even a domestic asset protection trust isn’t worth it, and you’d need at least $2.5M for a foreign trust.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 02:29 AM
19

There is nothing more permanent than temporary orders!
/r/MensRights15/04/23 10:00 PM
2

I swear to God - the only way to ever be able to retire in America if you want a family is to have stupid kids that elope. No college and no weddings to pay for.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 09:34 PM
6

It actually swept the nation in the 1970s after California passed it. The governor who signed it was none other than Ronald Reagan.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 09:29 PM
3

Quite ironically - the first no fault divorce was signed into law by the Governor of California - Ronald Reagan.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 09:27 PM
3

Yeah - IIRC, something like the bottom 45% of Americans actually pay 0 income tax.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 09:24 PM
3

The highlighted portion of your link says they double the standard deduction, which is $13k. That deduction is applied to your taxable income. That’s not the same thing as saving $13k in taxes.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 08:18 PM
4

Just identify as non-binary
/r/MensRights14/04/23 02:22 PM
1

Up until Tibet, you had me at Canada
/r/MensRights12/04/23 01:56 PM
1

Better yet, gender-fluid - a man all the time, except when it comes to applying for jobs and benefits - then it’s, all of a sudden, “Man, I feel like a woman …”
/r/MensRights12/04/23 01:48 PM
1

Lol! Or better yet, “Are we fucking the same sl*t”
/r/MensRights11/04/23 11:09 AM
3

As a lawyer in the United States, I can tell you that this is really good advice. Never really thought about it, but I might use it. It goes against the grain of “never talk to the police” and I definitely would not recommend taking one at the police station without involvement of your lawyer. But with a properly negotiated protocol and your lawyer present - there actually is a lot of upside to this. While not admissible in court, the police do rely on polygraphs in how to direct their investiga…
/r/MensRights10/04/23 03:39 PM
3

If you are under arrest in the United States, you should at the least get a public defender. Also, don’t be too proud to turn to your parents - and they may be more forgiving than you think. You need a support network.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 03:14 PM
5

Maybe it’s only my experience - but most feminists that I know don’t watch any sports. And most women that I know that do watch are primarily tradcon
/r/MensRights04/04/23 03:42 PM
3

If the university is a public one, and the “debate” group was a university program (as opposed to a student group), your first amendment rights were probably violated. That said though - there really isn’t a practical remedy.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 02:10 PM
3

Honestly - it’s not the miracles that bring me to God, it’s the horror show on earth that does
/r/MensRights03/04/23 10:55 AM
5

And the sniper was a woman.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:22 AM
20

Because part of their entitlement is that you can’t call them out.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 02:55 AM
3

In both the states that I’m licensed in - sentences for crimes committed during “a single criminal episode” or “incident” are served concurrently. During a bank robbery, the defendant goes from teller to teller. For each teller, he has committed an armed robbery, but will serve all of the sentences together. On the other hand, the guy hits half the tellers, comes back the next day and hits the other half. That’s two incidents. But none of this applies to this guy because each rape WAS a separate…
/r/MensRights29/03/23 10:42 PM
3

1) Ana Maria Ramos 2) David Cook 3) Victoria Neave Here’s a video that discusses how these three derailed it in the last session. If you’re from Houston, you may recognize the name Wayne Dolcefino - he used to be an investigative reporter for channel 13. https://youtu.be/iUQ174oHqec
/r/MensRights29/03/23 07:32 PM
24

They let you do as much as you can and they don’t worry about the rest.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 04:43 PM
5

Texas attorney here, but not his attorney. (1) tell him to get snipped (2) do not sign the birth certificate until a paternity test confirms he’s the father (3) assuming he is the father He’s gonna have to pay child support - 20% off net income (but it tends to taper off after about $2000/month) + he will need to add the child to his health insurance policy. Her income doesn’t matter. (4) visitation - look up the standard possession order - after the child is 3, it come out to every other weeken…
/r/MensRights29/03/23 03:08 PM
19

Every time I think America is fucked up, along come either Canada or Australia saying “hold my beer”
/r/MensRights29/03/23 12:19 PM
4

Ask these same fools - if a woman in a lesbian marriage came out as bisexual and revealed she was having sex with a man, would that be cheating?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 11:55 PM
1

Simply put, we are not human to them. It is easy to ignore someone’s right after dehumanizing them
/r/MensRights28/03/23 09:25 PM
1

Does the deferred judgment allow for a later expunction of the arrest record? If so - that’s not a bad outcome. Follow your probation terms to the letter and then expunge all the records
/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:12 PM
1

The recording and proof are not the problem. The majority of us states are one party consent states and even the two party states, it is usually still legal when there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. Even when there is proof - the police don’t care, and the prosecutors don’t care. You can call a police officer from right outside the mothers house, show him the certified court order, knock on the mothers door, have him witness her refusal, and they still won’t do anything!
/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:03 PM
3

What does your lawyer say about the protective order charge?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 04:03 PM
6

Interference with visitation (in my state, it is called custodial interference) is a crime in almost every state, and in many states a felony. And I know of no state where visitation is contingent on child support or vice versa. However - the police refuse to make arrests (and will make up any and all lies to avoid helping) and the prosecutors refuse to prosecute this. It’s an absolute dereliction of duty. For example, in the state of Texas, custodial interference (25.03 of Texas Penal Code) is …
/r/MensRights28/03/23 02:34 PM
5

For death - you absolutely have to get a term life policy with at least 8X your annual earnings - as you get older and accumulate savings, you can reduce it. For disability - you can get disability insurance - and often time through your employer But yeah - unemployment is like the atomic bomb - the only thing you can do is save, save, save
/r/MensRights27/03/23 04:27 PM
8

Lol! You’re not wrong.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 08:50 PM
60

You might as well move everyone in NYC to Riker’s Island if telling someone to fuck off is a crime
/r/MensRights24/03/23 04:17 PM
6

congratulations even more!
/r/MensRights22/03/23 08:01 PM
8

I gather from contextual clues that you are between 15-18. Well Congratulations - but today, you became an adult! You chose to stand for the truth instead of saying what people wanted.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 07:41 PM
2

Just a kind note - the lady that is pictured was not the one that said this and is actually expressing concern that her son and other young boys have to walk egg shells. While she was saying all this - a feminist cut in and said that boys should be afraid
/r/MensRights22/03/23 07:06 PM
3

If you don’t name a beneficiary, it will go to your estate, by default. If you don’t have a will, it will pass under the laws of intestacy. If you have no wife or offspring, it will then go to your parents, siblings, nieces and nephews. After that, most states proceed to aunts and uncles, then cousins. You really have to be an only child of an only child of an only child, and then it goes to the state. You could establish a charitable trust, but would need to name trustees.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 01:42 PM
154

There are asset locators that can figure this information this out. Years ago, I heard of a trick that a debt collection law firm used - they sent printed official looking checks for about $10 to people and saw where it was cashed. Of course, you could always bring an action for contempt of court and in that process, subject her to a debtors examination.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 05:00 PM
2

That’s not what the B stands for!
/r/MensRights16/03/23 12:17 PM
4

Damn, that’s even worse than ACAB!
/r/MensRights16/03/23 01:55 AM
5

Oh Amber, not again!
/r/AntiFeminists16/03/23 01:38 AM
0

Without knowing more facts, it’s impossible to draw any conclusions. Not that random redditors are good sources for advise
/r/MensRights15/03/23 03:10 PM
2

Here is an article there points out the flaws in the Massachusetts study which I believe is the one referred to. To summarize: (1) joint legal custody does not equal physical custody (2) “requested custody” only referred to requests made in the initial divorce papers and did not include requests made at a later time (3) failure to compare outcomes of fathers requesting custody to mothers requesting (4) the author makes the following point - “There is a legitimate argument that in the prevailing …
/r/MensRights15/03/23 12:04 PM
1

It’s not just that - but given the costs of a custody battle, it is very likely that there is selection bias among the ones that do “aggressively pursue” it.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 11:39 AM
11

Very true. From the article: “Educational services: Women were 61.6% of managers and 68.9% of non-managers. Financial activities: Women were 51.4% of managers and 54.6% of non-managers. Health care and social assistance: Women were 70.0% of managers and 77.9% of non-managers.” We’re talking single digit percentages.
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/23 03:08 AM
13

That was not even remotely funny. What is it about misandrist humor that is just serious insults delivered like their jokes. Even the devil pushing a snowblower with the caption, “A man asked for directions” would have been funnier.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 02:15 AM
2

In fairness - he’s been clean, ever since
/r/MensRights12/03/23 07:28 PM
2

“And the reason women lost the right to abortions is because there not enough of them in Arlington”
/r/MensRights11/03/23 04:46 PM
2

That whole thread is a dumpster fire of bad legal advice and sexism. When he points out his rights, he gets downvoted into oblivion
/r/MensRights11/03/23 09:55 AM
1

Can you post a link about the student and lawyer that were arrested? Interested in reading about it.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 09:14 AM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights09/03/23 08:33 PM
3

This one never gets old! One thing should be added. While he was speaking, the “lady”, Zarna Joshi, we’re constantly disrupting him and at one point, asked what race was his daughter. Zarna Joshi is absolutely wacko. This is just par for the course.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 03:26 PM
11

As a practical matter, he will never be able to collect it. He can put a wage garnishment and collect her wages, provided her wages are over a certain amount. But even then, whatever he collects won’t even cover the interest. And seeing that she is getting a rap sheet - it is highly unlikely that she is going to be making wages that are even above that minimum amount. That said, it will be no walk in the park for her. The judgment will show up for any credit check, like renting an apartment or f…
/r/MensRights01/03/23 03:44 PM
79

I can vouch for that. I have worked my entire career at law firms. Legal secretaries are 100% women. The secretaries usually share an open space. That space is a cesspit a toxic femininity. And then the most ironic part - all of them, with no exceptions, prefer to work for male attorneys. Our firm hired a very successful woman attorney and not one of the legal secretaries wanted to be assigned to her. It had to be forced onto the most junior secretary.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:40 PM
1

I agree with all your arguments, but what I find concerning is that evidently had expectations of a person (that she was “a sweet old lady”) that you have never met. I share your disgust, but not your disappointment
/r/MensRights24/02/23 10:07 PM
8

I invite you to write an original post about your experiences. Your experience is extremely relevant in that (1) you have conclusive proof or falsity of every accusation; (2) you have a decently high N; and (3) in each instance, you were only looking for the truth.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 04:33 PM
9

You have a very unique perspective. I’m sure a lot of us would love to here some stories. Just curious - out of the 40 SA allegations - of which 39 were not genuine - how far off were the allegations from what the tape showed?
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:36 PM
3

They don’t just imply it. Take a look at the last slide and notice the yellow rectangle. It states that these cases are reports of sexual assaults reported to police. However, proportionally of the 25 men in the box, at least 22 will not be convicted of anything. (using US figures). Yet 21 are still marked black.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 04:57 AM
1

No. The 14th Amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States…” The children of diplomats are not considered “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/23 08:59 AM
1

It was bad, but it wasn’t six months for overpaying like the header says.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 07:52 PM
7

ACAB
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:11 PM
5

This exactly! I like to enjoy a cigar at a cigar lounge, and in all the years I’ve been going there, the only ladies I’ve seen are the staff.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 11:53 AM
5

These poll findings vary dramatically based on methodology and how the question is asked. For example - notice in this poll, only 19% said it described them “very well”, and 42% said it described them “somewhat well.” It’s not even clear what the third option was but it got twice as much support as “very well.” Here’s a poll that shows the number at 29% when asked the question, yea or no https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/american-women-and-feminism
/r/MensRights27/01/23 11:38 PM
2

Lol! Especially in the morning!
/r/MensRights26/01/23 02:26 PM
6

Lol! Well given their initial findings, I doubt their going to get funding for a larger study
/r/MensRights26/01/23 02:20 PM
4

You can - but, you can only file against the person posting the false statement. In the US, you cannot sue the platform. Most people don’t have significant assets that are worth pursuing. When the defendant does not have any assets, contingency fee lawyers lose interest.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 06:38 PM
4

It’s one of the usual suspects. I’m not going to say the quiet part out loud to avoid allegations of brigading. But you can see the other user name (the one with “mango” in it). Put it into the search and you can easily find the thread.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 10:27 PM
1

In went up to the 14th because SCOTUS seemed to suggest that the right of privacy could also exist there.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 07:42 PM
7

Honestly - just read the first 14 amendments to the US constitution (it’s an astonishingly short read, less than 10 pages double spaced) and ask yourself where it says that there is a constitutional right to an abortion. This was a case of a court ruling the case based on what they thought was the “just” result as opposed to what the law dictated.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 06:37 PM
2

I agree. She was raped - but not by whom she thought. There is a difference between being wrong and lying, and I think she was the former. In 1984, eyewitness identification was considered very reliable. Since then DNA has shown that not to be the case.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 11:35 PM
12

Well - although it is hard to see any bright side in this - at least you have learned about the world before getting married and having children. Another life tip - avoid relationships with women you come across at work. As the saying goes - “Don’t shit where you eat.”
/r/MensRights16/01/23 07:24 PM
2

I believe I read somewhere that Johnny Depp was gonna be there.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 04:47 PM
1

I don’t have any method accept a deep dive case by case analysis of the evidence, which, of course, is subject to multiple interpretations. I don’t know what you mean by implicit bias. What I’m saying is that we accept that we don’t know the number. But what’s more important than the actual number is that we do know that given the right motives, people do lie, including about rape. Therefore, whenever an allegation of rape is made - we must look at the evidence unique to that alleged incident. W…
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/23 05:14 PM
1

Nobody knows the number.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/23 03:05 PM
1

I don’t think that is reasonable, either. The standard for guilt is proof beyond reasonable doubt. And absence of proof is a far cry from proof of absence. It has to be conceded that a non-zero number of rapes do happen without sufficient proof for a conviction. Even the video, which says it may be as high as 40% would imply that this is true.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/23 03:29 AM
0

The numbers for the costs to raise a child are heavily exaggerated because they are not based on marginal cost increase. If a household has two parents and one child, they assume the cost is 1/3 of the entire household expense. For many expenses that is not accurate. Consider rent - as the number of occupants goes up, the total rent does go up, but the rent/occupant goes down. Therefore, a much more accurate way would be to subtract household expenses of a married couple from household expenses …
/r/MensRights15/01/23 12:26 AM
2

They did mind the all male Supreme Court that decided Roe v. Wade.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 12:28 AM
1

Made the mistake of reading the thread. Ad hominem fallacy in action.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 08:52 AM
2

In fairness, many women enjoy it too. Here’s a fun experiment, tell your date you have tickets for a WNBA game and an NBA game and let her pick.
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/23 12:26 PM
2

They tried to for many years with the myth about domestic violence and the Super Bowl. It was proven wrong repeatedly. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/domestic-violence-super-bowl-sunday/
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/23 11:18 AM
1

I made the mistake of reading that thread, and I think I just lost brain cells. That has to be the most misandrist person I’ve ever seen.
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/23 11:12 AM
1

You choose the red pill!
/r/MensRights10/01/23 04:17 AM
1

There was a LOT more to it. Back when the case happened in 2014, I remember looking at the court documents from the Harris county clerk website (Houston). He was behind at the time the action was brought (through a bureaucratic mixup) and then overpaid the deficiency. It was still an injustice, 8 days, but not as bad as the news story made it seem. Here’s a fact check and I can vouch that what is written is consistent with my review of the court documents https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/jail-o…
/r/MensRights09/01/23 05:39 PM
5

Is it just me - or does she look like her butt cheeks and breasts switched places?
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/23 07:50 PM
10

If I had kids today, I’d put them in parochial school with the hopes of getting them away from this wine nonsense … and I’m practically atheist.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 03:23 PM
47

isn’t “neckbeard” the backup insult to “incel” ?
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 08:21 PM
13

Looks like someone just dodged a bullet, and it wasn’t her.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 12:30 PM
7

That lady at the front right - her laugh was just insufferable.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 04:23 AM
22

Horrifying. He has a restraining order against the mother for domestic violence. Mother violates the order numerous times with no consequences and the judge actually makes fun of him. Mother is investigated by CPS for squeezing the child head, and child gets placed with grandmother without even considering father. He pays child support and has only been able to see his child one time.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 04:39 PM
2

2x has over 10M members
/r/MensRights02/01/23 02:21 PM
1

Ah - ok - sounds like what Americans call “deferred adjudication” or “deferred prosecution”
/r/MensRights02/01/23 01:39 PM
1

What is a peace bond?
/r/MensRights02/01/23 01:24 PM
5

Lol … Every time I think America has lost its mind, along cove Canada and Australia saying, “hold my beer”. On another note, Happy New Year
/r/MensRights01/01/23 12:33 PM
38

Lol! I was gonna say - I am the absolute opposite of fucked, cause that’s a bunch of drama that I won’t have to deal with
/r/MensRights01/01/23 11:54 AM
15

Agreed if his name wasn’t on the deed. But in both states where I’m licensed, even a final restraining order does not change title to real property - it forbids you from access but not ownership. The sale of the house is handled separately from the restraining order. Although a judge can order a party to accept an offer - there are a LOT of steps and it is not done quickly and OP would have really had to be asleep ignoring many notices not to know it. I was assuming that this was in the United S…
/r/MensRights01/01/23 11:10 AM
66

This is a good point. If she sold your home without your signature, or forged signature, the new buyers deed is defective. Get an attorney to help you write a letter to the buyers (which shouldn’t be too expensive) - 99%, the buyers will turn it over to their title insurance. The title insurance does not play around if you didn’t sign, or the signature was forged. They will get to the bottom of it.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 09:19 AM
3

Lol! Just wait till she finds out about the great WHITE shark …
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 09:36 PM
25

What is “feminininism”?
/r/MensRights28/12/22 09:16 PM
4

Id rather pay a professional wife a salary, than a professional ex-wife alimony.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 02:36 PM
1

Of course he has. And $100,000 is low - it would be probably be more like $250,000, not even including college. But the real trauma is happens to the child. And that’s why Walmart “polygraph and cross examine” shoppers (on note - how would that be effective, anyways?) to avoid theft of a few hundred dollars is not a good comparison.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 05:33 AM
-3

There’s also an imbalance of proportionality. The degree of invasiveness versus should be based on the harm sought to be avoided. Thats why there is a difference in the search that is conducted before boarding an airplane versus leaving a Walmart.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:27 PM
36

If that is the case, then how do they explain the unusually large numbers of Asian Americans in STEM. I might be wrong, but I believe even Asian American woman are over represented in STEM as compared to their population at large.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 07:27 PM
35

“Upon further investigation, it was determined that 22 of the 26 who died were men. They since we know that lowering the entrance requirements for inclusivity does not reduce competency, it can only be concluded that the men’s fragility made them unable to survive their car falling into the river.”
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:28 PM
29

Here we go again - the sole evidence of discrimination is unequal outcome.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 05:53 PM
6

Pretrial detentions happen all the time
/r/MensRights23/12/22 04:18 PM
2

“all the football fields in Texas” - Lol 😂 That’s a good one! I’m stealing it
/r/MensRights21/12/22 01:54 PM
2

And they always give that pikaccu surprised face when they’re r/pussypassdenied
/r/MensRights16/12/22 10:49 AM
36

He actually did bring a case against them as well as the authorities, the school, the police, the prosecutors. But every one except the girls was able to get the case dismissed - because in fairness, they had no way to know whether the accusations were true or not. As a result - the only case that he had left was against the girls, themselves. And seeing that they are high school students, it’s unlikely that he will ever collect enough to cover his attorneys fees.
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 10:39 PM
4

Every time I think America has sunk to a new low, along comes either Canada or Australia saying “hold my beer”
/r/MensRights12/12/22 01:28 AM
4

America compromises its national security to get her out of a gulag Gets back to America. “I hate America”
/r/MensRights09/12/22 12:36 AM
8

Sigh! First world problems ….
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/22 08:22 PM
20

I clicked the link - and saw where you asked to provide citations. My God - she just dumped a bunch anecdotal stuff. A lot of it didn’t even support her what she was saying, and, at best, it was much more nuanced than she suggested.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:55 PM
56

And at one point she didn’t think that the national anthem should be played at WNBA games. Wonder what her stance is now … probably the same
/r/MensRights08/12/22 03:21 PM
4

No, It’S EqUiTy!
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/22 02:42 PM
105

Bet she’ll be singing the National anthem now …. No wait, that would require self reflection
/r/MensRights08/12/22 02:37 PM
1

I think there was a survivor episode where a group of 20 or so women went on an uninhabited island. Did not go well for them at all.
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/22 02:54 PM
5

We respect all cultures - boycott the World Cup, because of Qatar’s policies on LGTBQ
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/22 02:43 PM
14

That’s terrible. I wish him recovery with God speed, and I hope that everyone involved in this is punished to the fullest extent of the law, both criminally and civil.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 02:53 PM
2

Read about the MacMartin Preschool Trial in the 1980s. Over 300 counts of child sexual abuse, a four year trial, and not one single conviction. 5 out of the 6 defendants were women. Absolutely, the worst witch hunt ever.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 04:25 AM
2

It depends. The area is about 1.4. Graphing them out, there is one area that surrounded by ln and x-3. But that is not circumscribed by all THREE variables. There is another area which is bounded on the top by x-3, the bottom by ln x, and on the right by the first equation. I assume that is what you are asking about. The first and the second curve intersect at about (6.5, 3.5), the second curve and the third curve intersect at about (4.5, 1.5). I'm not going to lie, I cheated on the ln x = (x-5)…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 01:46 AM
25

Typical feminist on reddit “logic”: If x > y, x = infinity y = 0
/r/MensRights04/12/22 08:29 PM
2

That’s a wise move. The less you and your kid can have to do with her, the better.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 07:20 PM
2

GW would be harder because the public is extremely familiar with his likeness, thanks to the dollar bill. So a movie maker would want someone that they could make to look like the picture of George Washington that people have in their mind. I think a more apt comparison to Anne Boleyn would be an African American playing John Adams.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 01:29 AM
2

I think the term is bona fide occupation requirement. It would be hard for an African American actor to portray George Washington. It’s a very narrow exception.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 05:37 PM
1

HR is not your friend. They have one purpose, and that is to keep the company out of a lawsuit, or if one if filed, helping the company win it.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 05:30 PM
3

And that appears to only include Canada - can’t imagine what is for the United States
/r/MensRights29/11/22 10:05 PM
22

A few things. First, although countries may have agreements in place with the United States, how it they are actually practiced and enforces is a whole different issue. That said - leaving the country is the easy part - surviving when you land is the hard part. To begin with, your immediate problem is not extradition, but deportation. Countries don’t just let people arrive and live there, just like that. This is where having a connection to another country might help - like if you are 1st genera…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 03:55 AM
1

And one of the assaults was on two police officers! Damn - if it was a man in United States, he’d be lucky to be alive!
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:56 PM
2

There is a huge tactical advantage in going first - you get to frame the issues. The judges first impression of your brother will be in as favorable light as his attorneys can make. It also creates the appearance of an actively interested father.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 04:45 PM
1

I got to disagree with you here - everyone is a caricature. Marge’s sisters - the 90s version of cat ladies. Marge - somewhat sensible - but useless. Lisa - precocious, but annoying.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 04:27 PM
3

It’s not even that in theory - the term “press formal charges” is a huge misnomer - only the prosecutors office can bring charges and their discretion is absolute. If they refuse to bring charges - there is nothing your can do.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/22 06:35 AM
2

Private individuals do not “press formal charges” - all they can do is call the police and give a statement. The police have absolute discretion over whether to make an arrest and the prosecutors office has absolute discretion over when and what, if any, charges are brought and if and how any charges are disposed.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/22 06:32 AM
19

Single parenting really started in the 70s, after no fault divorce statutes swept the nation and Title IV was passed in 1975.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 05:04 AM
28

Tell the men in your life how much you appreciate them.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 04:43 AM
1

r/imatotalpieceofshit The only thing I can say is that she is 19 and I’m holding out hope that maybe, as she gets older, she might see the wrongfulness of what she has done.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 03:40 AM
4

You can have an opinion on abortions without a uterus - as long as it’s pro-choice.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 07:13 PM
8

You really could, all the way into the fourth paragraph. And after that, you can swap out a few details - murders and cat calling with family court and it would make even more sense. It’s really something that she - on the one hand talks about eliminating sexism, but is then only concerned about murder when it is a man killing a woman.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 07:00 PM
4

Now that is what I call empowerment! Congrats on your success.
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/22 10:31 PM
3

Mostly agree. I have no objections to the “T” and the “E”.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/22 03:06 PM
6

Now I know what’s going to happen during my next nightmare - I better lay off the super stacked sandwich at night for a while
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/22 12:24 PM
20

I mean, women are less safe in lesbian relationships than heterosexual relationships.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 07:34 PM
20

Then wouldn’t child support and alimony also be misogynistic - it implies that women are incapable of making a living.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 07:30 PM
13

The last thing I want to see Musk do is start banning feminists - I just want them to NOT ban users that are willing to call out feminism for what it is
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 06:53 PM
1

So essentially he had a relationship with a 29 year old with an MD and Phd, that was not his subordinate and essentially had the same position that he had. But because he was 50+ and had a big name in the field, he had “indirect power” over her and “coerced” her.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 04:05 PM
3

And don’t forget the violence that is perpetrated by the man-hating family courts.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 04:00 PM
5

True - I remember hearing on Lehto’s law that in Germany, the police were targeting people that liked anti-cop messages posted in a Facebook story about two cops that were killed as hate speech. I can think of no bigger reason for free speech than criticism of the government and it’s agents.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 03:46 PM
8

And this is why I am glad the United States does not have hate speech laws, and is very unlikely, due to the 1st Amendment. The enforcement of hate speech is inevitably discriminatory
/r/MensRights16/11/22 03:34 PM
3

Feminism is as much about equality and North Korea is a democracy of the Korean people.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 02:33 PM
3

Wow! I took a look and that’s five minutes of my life I’ll never get back. What a piece of work. I’m tempted to jump in, but then I’m reminded of the old adage - “Never fight with a pig, you’ll both get covered in shit, but the pig likes it”
/r/MensRights16/11/22 02:03 PM
11

Psychopaths or BPDs gain a lot from false accusations - they enjoy the harm they cause another. Also, vindictiveness is as old as time, itself. What these people fail to understand is that just because it is hard for an actual rape victim to come forward because of their trauma, that doesn’t mean that it is hard for a person that wasn’t raped to lie. And the other problem - let’s suppose for the sake of argument that 98% of rape accusation are true - that is only the case because there is due pr…
/r/MensRights16/11/22 01:26 PM
2

$100 trillion *GDP.
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 06:46 PM
7

And don’t forget, make 75% of the spending decisions
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 04:19 PM
12

The world has about $100 trillion. I’m pretty sure men contribute way more than 55% of that. And then don’t forget to add in the unpaid labor that men do.
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 04:18 PM
27

I remember that survey - it also calculated that a SAHM worked 90 hrs/week. It calculated labor of doing the laundry as the combined time of the entire wash and dry cycle.
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 04:15 PM
10

Women make about 75% of consumer spending decisions, IIRC
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 03:53 PM
26

And don’t forget commuting to work. That’s at least an hour a day that you’re not being paid for.
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 03:47 PM
21

I really hope the Supreme Court (1) finds affirmative action in the public sector unconstitutional, and (2) finds it illegal under the civil rights act of 1964
/r/MensRights12/11/22 12:49 AM
5

ngl - but he does look a bit like WW
/r/MensRights10/11/22 10:24 PM
10

Honest question, not rhetorical - What is the difference between social majority and majority?
/r/MensRights10/11/22 08:16 PM
5

The lie that feminism keeps selling young girls is that their career is the most important thing in the world. Reality check - the vast majority of people do not have careers - they have jobs … miserable, boring, if not back-breaking jobs.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 02:10 AM
2

I usually mock them by saying, “I’m AgAiNsT nAzIs, So If YoU dIsAgReE wItH mE, yOu’Re A nAzI”
/r/MensRights09/11/22 09:53 PM
16

And not mention that this procedure is way more painful and dangerous than breast implants. The surgery involves breaking a major bone in the lower leg and lengthening it by a mm every day. The process takes three months and the patient is in a wheel chair the whole time. I also can’t imagine that the patient will not have arthritis or some problems later in life.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 06:14 PM
2

Lol! I think there actually was a Survivor episode where a team of women were sent to one island, and a team of men were sent to another island. For the women, it was an absolute disaster. The men on the other hand did pretty good.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/22 05:22 PM
0

Teaching pay is not bad in many of the northern states, and they get a great pension.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 12:16 AM
1

No - it’s more like, when a field becomes high paying, men start flocking to it.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 11:58 PM
60

“This has been the worst experience of my life, but I’m grateful that I had it, because it has changed me so dramatically to the core,” Katie Quackenbush told the newspaper on Thursday. “Sometimes hard lessons are the best lessons.” Wow - man gets shot by woman. Women most affected.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 10:50 PM
9

Good on them! This may be the first time I have ever seen feminists, albeit in Russia, do something for men.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 10:43 PM
14

Not gonna lie - It honestly would have been even more satisfying if he had knocked one of them on their asses after they put their hands on him. But then again, since it was a social experiment, he really couldn’t. Or maybe if it was like “What would you do”
/r/MensRights08/11/22 11:25 AM
1

Lol! “I don’t have the emotional capacity to engage in this.” Yep, not intellectual capacity …
/r/MensRights06/11/22 10:34 PM
11

And that too, was after he spent millions to clear his name.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/22 09:31 PM
2

Lol! I always caricature my move to the right as going to the dark side!
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/22 07:09 PM
3

Never argue with a pig. You’ll both get covered in shit, but the ping likes it!
/r/MensRights03/11/22 05:15 AM
8

It’s better to be judged by 12, then carried by 6 I know of no law that is more universal than that
/r/MensRights02/11/22 06:44 PM
3

Report him to the bar - it’s unethical to threaten criminal charges to get an gain an advantage in a civil processing. DR 7-102(A)(2) (Model Rules of Professional Responsibility).
/r/MensRights02/11/22 03:09 PM
1

Most likely waived it - almost every attorney does that.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 08:02 PM
10

Oh man - it’s gonna be long time before I can eat at Taco Bell again!
/r/MensRights01/11/22 02:19 PM
2

If you are in Florida, remember deSantis vetoed alimony reform and 50/50 parenting. Might be a reason to vote for Crist.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 06:17 PM
2

Advising to encourage a video game habit was the dead giveaway!
/r/MensRights31/10/22 02:23 AM
4

Lol! I you’re right. What feminist would encourage playing video games.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 02:22 AM
5

And a lot of feminists even say that Johnny Depp was the abuser. Just see some of the things that Michelle Dauber, a law professor at Stanford says. She’s even insinuated that he was a pedophile.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 10:34 PM
7

I respect the fact that she tested her beliefs, with fearlessness to follow the outcome of the test wherever it lead. Then when the outcome did not go as expected, she strong enough to reflect on the shortcomings of her own beliefs and change them.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:25 PM
5

If it weren’t for immigration, the American population would be falling. I read somewhere that the average woman needs to have 2.1 children to maintain the population (without immigration) and the average American woman has 1.9 and falling.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:41 AM
7

Expecting men to avert their eyes is absurd.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:32 AM
8

When I was young, my mother taught both me and my sister that it was impolite to stare at anyone
/r/MensRights27/10/22 09:13 PM
3

This seems like a standard tactic by the left to attack minority politicians on the right. Exactly what politician isn’t rich?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 05:17 PM
3

I went to Quora and looked at her account - a lot of people are accusing it of being a troll account. But these days, you can never be sure. Yesterdays satire is todays reality.
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/22 02:08 PM
2

JP is the best of the bunch. I have never heard ANYONE even come close to defeating him in an argument. That said - in most situations, the debate are very rarely about a broad issue, but about his books. So he IS the issue and chooses his words carefully. When the debate is about something that he wrote and he is careful not to say anything stupid, of course he never gets tripped up. His books are very good. I strongly recommend 12 Rules for Life. Another comment has said that somebody beat up …
/r/MensRights26/10/22 06:36 PM
2

Tell the men (dad, brother, SO, son) in your life how much you appreciate them.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 02:28 PM
1

And in this day and age, the “alibi” may be a video camera or cell tower ping, occurring contemporaneously in time and impossibly far from the alleged crime.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 02:26 PM
-1

ThE hIjAcKeRs On 9/11 WeRe MeN, sO iT’s ThAt WaS JuSt MeN kIlLiNg MeN!
/r/MensRights25/10/22 11:56 PM
2

Ironic the college named after Justice Brandeis would be on the receiving end. I read the quote and that it was from Brandeis
/r/MensRights25/10/22 09:00 PM
4

Or better yet, just go to seeking arrangements or some other sugar dating website. It’ll cost you a lot less than an alimony or child support payment.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 09:51 PM
1

Dude - it was just a tongue in cheek way of expressing my outrage at UK’s laws about rape. I don’t think I could have minimized American independence more than saying I’m glad it happened so that way our laws about rape are (slightly) less insane (… so far), though the People’s Republic of California might give you guys a good run for your money.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 11:47 AM
0

That’s a pretty good litmus test.
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/22 03:25 AM
16

These trolls belong in r/imatotalpieceofshit. The story is so wholesome and they look so happy.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 05:15 PM
8

When you’re old and rich, you’re eccentric. When you’re old and poor, you’re creepy.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/22 10:19 AM
3

And what would him having a say entail - Forcing her to kill their unborn child and submit to chemo? I’m sorry, but that is not his choice to make. And quite frankly, his wife’s choice to put their unborn child’s life ahead of hers has to be the most noble acts a human being can do. I don’t envy his position, but to call it helpless and powerless is like saying “when men die in war, women are most affected …”
/r/MensRights21/10/22 11:08 PM
2

Honest question - what’s your take on Rishi Sunak? I thought i remember him saying he was going to put a stop to woke nonsense in almost those same words. Don’t know anything about his other policy stances but I sure would love to see the woke crowd lose their shit
/r/MensRights21/10/22 05:50 PM
5

It has no white men, either she was forced to resign … It was a middle of the night attempt at humor. I absolutely agree with you that demographics should have no role in hiring
/r/MensRights21/10/22 03:44 PM
27

Don’t worry - she still has a no white male cabinet. But now there are also no white females, no blacks, and no LGBTQs either.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 09:17 AM
12

And 45 days later, it has No white women No black men No black women And no LGTBQs either
/r/MensRights21/10/22 07:08 AM
1

They’re not wrong about dodging a bullet - it’s just that he was the one dodging.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:17 PM
1

And failed to witness a single World Series, Super Bowl, or NBA Championship. It did manage to see a regular season NBA game by just two days.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:12 PM
0

And yet she is the only PM since Churchill to have served under two monarchs
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:48 PM
2

Years ago, if I had watched this, I would have thought it was satire.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:44 PM
3

Please don’t take this the wrong way, but you know that ruckus we had with each about 250 years ago? Well, this kind of makes me glad it happened …
/r/MensRights19/10/22 09:16 PM
4

The part about reading Mad magazine is hilariously ironic. 😂
/r/MensRights19/10/22 06:58 PM
26

There’s a more recent example of the workers who empty public garbage bins going on strike. There was a picture of the streets covered in trash after the 10th day
/r/MensRights19/10/22 03:27 PM
11

Or better yet, gender fluid. There a woman until they get hired, or whenever statistic are measured, but a man every other day.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 11:58 AM
8

Show her a picture of the streets in Scotland where the workers who empty the public bins went on strike. The streets were littered with trash, everywhere. I’ll hazard a guess that at least 95% of the workers were men.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 11:47 AM
16

Ukraine and Russia just entered the conversation
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/22 11:39 AM
52

And then if you add - “or had something to drink” - it would probably include everyone. I mean, you could then include any hookup from a bar. Heck, I’m sure a husband and wife having sex after sharing a bottle of wine happens all the time.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 11:27 AM
2

But I like the way he took revenge. They told him he can’t disclose what he got, so he buys a Lamborghini and drives it to where one the Title IX administrators is giving a speech and keeps reving the engine. He also takes out parody websites with domain names of several people he wanted to get back at, many of whom lost their job. This guy is so petty - but gawd damn it’s funny
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:22 AM
5

This cannot be emphasized enough. If you go pro se against an attorney, you will lose. There are just too many procedural and evidentiary rules to navigate. Sadly - you would expect judges to give pro se litigants some latitude - but they don’t. If anything, they are more lax on the attorneys, letting them get away with omissions that they would never let a pro se party get away with.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 04:01 PM
1

What’s amazing about that was even though his face betrayed him, what he said after that was very stoic and articulate.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 06:09 PM
3

It Depends on the state, it’s anywhere from 16-18. Also, in most states, teachers are absolutely not allowed to have sex with students, regardless of age
/r/MensRights17/10/22 03:48 PM
23

And if the voices were all men, we’d hear about how chauvinistic it is.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 12:42 AM
2

Nothing that goes against the feminist narrative will ever be a “trustworthy source” to them
/r/MensRights01/10/22 07:22 PM
2

And that 15% less is heavily explained by the types of work and difference in hours worked.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 07:21 PM
3

The most hilarious part of Facebook fact checking was that someone (I believe it was John Stossel) whose post got flagged as untruthful. So he sued Facebook on the grounds that their fact checking was a defamation of his character. Facebook’s defense - the fact checking is an opinion, so it cannot be defamation Edit: yep, it was Stossel. Here’s a link https://nypost.com/2021/12/13/facebook-bizarrely-claims-its-misquote-is-opinion/amp/
/r/MensRights01/10/22 11:50 AM
2

Not that hard to believe, given the sexist air conditioner https://youtu.be/MNH0bmYT7os
/r/MensRights01/10/22 11:44 AM
1

Study finds that 90% of studies and 80% of statistics are lies.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 11:38 AM
105

I’ll put this right next to the sexist air conditioner
/r/AntiFeminists30/09/22 09:46 PM
8

In a joint account, any of the joint holders can withdraw the money.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 01:49 PM
3

I believe that for every human killed by a shark (around 10/year), there are over 10 million sharks (100M/year) that are killed by humans, many, just for their fins. Also, those few attacks are primarily by three species of sharks, the gray white, the bull shark, and the tiger shark.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 10:32 PM
3

Probably referring to gender fluid - they aren’t included on the days they identify as women
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/22 08:57 PM
2

It’s not just that. If, for the sake of argument, it is 97%/3% actually are unreported/reported, you would have to multiply … ahem … times it (the reported number) by 33, not 97 like she says.
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/22 06:49 PM
1

Honestly, the Scots have been denigrated enough - that fallacy name should be called the another True Feminist Fallacy
/r/MensRights27/09/22 04:53 PM
5

Feminism is as much about equality as the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is a democracy of the Korean people.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 04:50 PM
2

You might be right for the United States - but this was in Canada.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:54 PM
40

First thing - I wish we would stop saying “not all men” - it’s, at best, a very tiny minority of men that commit major crimes. A better statement would be “hardly any men” About the argument with the poisoned chocolates - just show them the infamous Trump add involving the skittles and Syrian immigrants. I tell them, just change “Syrian immigrants” to “men” and it says exactly what they are saying https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37416457.amp
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:35 PM
215

PuTiN iS a MaN sO iT’s JuSt MeN kIlLiNg EaCh OtHeR!
/r/MensRights21/09/22 01:26 PM
2

I don’t disagree. Being better than the left is a pretty low bar to clear.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 09:23 PM
1

Maybe you should read Texas v Johnson (holding a Texas statute desecrating the flag unconstitutional) and US v Eichman (holding the Flag Protection Act of 1989, 18 USC 700 unconstitutional). I am not giving the left a pass. But I sure as hell won’t give the right a pass, either.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 08:50 PM
2

My reading of Animal Farm was that it was a direct critique of socialism - I read “all animals are equal. some animals are more equal than others” as a direct attack on socialist hypocrisy. Was that true?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:14 PM
0

He could have better made his point by saying that it discriminated against or disproportionately affected minorities. If he has the statistics and case studies to back him up, then it would have been a fair discussion to have.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:44 PM
5

Don’t kid yourself - it was republicans that most recently tried to amend the constitution to outlaw flag burning. In the past, we had McCarthyism (which practically wrote the playbook for cancel culture), we the Bible thumper in the 80s burning books and backtracking records, and during the aughts, they were calling people terrorist sympathizers for question whether Iraq had WMD. The left does not have a monopoly on this. I see that my original comment has really set of a left vs right, who is …
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:39 PM
2

And of the countries where there are hate speech laws, when has a feminist ever been jailed? The only one I can think of was in Norway - and she got in trouble for being a transphobic. I have no idea what country you are from, but in the US, criminal prosecutions are in the exclusive discretion of the government. Cops and prosecutors are the absolute LAST people I want deciding what speech gets prosecuted and what doesn’t. I can easily see a government that primarily throws the Andrew Tates and …
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:11 PM
6

I’m not dog whistling anyone. I really would rather live with the rare times that someone has made a racist remark at me than live in a society without the 1st amendment.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:02 PM
15

And that’s another problem with “hate speech” laws. What constitutes hate speech is entirely dependent on who is in power. I’ll bet those same people that who accuse JP of hate speech are the same ones that carry the hashtag #killallmen. Yet one is hate speech and the other isn’t.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:26 AM
205

This is just nuts. Call me whatever racist name you want. I’d rather deal with a racist insult than censorship.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 07:03 PM
5

I’m Gen X. Reagan boosted defense spending. And if you questioned it, you were a communist. And then there was George W Bush. He said Iraq had WMDs. And if you questioned it - you sympathized with terrorists. That kind of thinking cemented me as a liberal. But today you have feminism. Question their dogma, and you are a misogynist. I no longer consider myself a liberal
/r/MensRights19/09/22 06:34 PM
2

Disclosure
/r/MensRights18/09/22 03:14 AM
9

Wait a second - wasn’t there some article in psychology today talking about so many men who are single and condescendingly telling them they just need to stop being so bitter and up their game. Now - there is saying that there are so many single women (which follows logically), but they create a new term to say it’s a good thing?
/r/AntiFeminists15/09/22 05:12 PM
23

From the article: “Men are overrepresented in injury from pretty much the time that we can crawl. It’s no different with driving and I think we’re increasingly understanding that we do need to actually start putting a gender lens on that,” Ivers said. Wow! “A gender lens” - I guess that’s the new term for sexism.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 03:30 PM
40

Break up. Nothing good is gonna come of this.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 09:43 PM
4

Thank you. That line is so misunderstood, Reddit really ought create a bot that explains it every time someone says that.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 08:50 PM
1

There’s that and the fact that she isn’t her 35.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 03:31 PM
2

Lol - in 2016, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. If anything kept her from being President, it was the majorities of whites women who voted from trump, not to mention overconfidence and running an exceptionally bland campaign. And of course, Kamala Harris is VP
/r/MensRights08/09/22 03:29 PM
5

the 1st amendment, in the United States
/r/MensRights08/09/22 03:16 PM
2

The “No true Scotsman” fallacy should be officially changed to the “No true feminist” fallacy
/r/MensRights08/09/22 12:53 PM
2

It’s not JUST contempt of court, but in many states, it’s also the crime of custodial interference. However, in my state, and I’ve heard several others, the police refuse to enforce it.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 12:46 PM
1

Lol! You know who else is “innocent” ? OJ. I here there’s a multimillion dollar award for the real murderer.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:24 PM
2

Dang, I’m a male and I die my hair cause it makes me look younger. Why wouldn’t I?
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/22 12:08 PM
12

Could have sworn I read a few days ago about a conviction against a mother for r@ping a 2 year old getting reversed because there was no penetration.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:02 AM
3

They do know. The problem is that their money source is domestic violence funds. If it gets out that DV is not gendered, the nexus between feminism and DV get broken.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 04:38 PM
2

It was a net positive, but not in the way of conventional wisdom. It exposed radical feminism to moderate feminists. I followed that trial very closely. The trial watching became almost a cottage industry, but among those that followed it closely, I would say that women outnumbered the men by almost a 2:1 margin, and support was lopsidedly in favor of Depp. So much so that if had a nickel for every time I’ve heard, “I’m a feminist, BUT …” - I’d be able to payoff of the judgment. You are right th…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 02:32 PM
2

I have no idea what the laws are in the Czech Republic, but in the US: Rule #1: STFU Rule #2: get a lawyer
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:46 PM
7

“Discrimination and bigotry doesn't have a race or gender.” I like that quote. I’m gonna use it. I truly hope that the Supreme Court puts an end to affirmative action.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:41 PM
0

Honest to God question. Unless there is a sudden surge in lesbians and/or polygamy has returned, shouldn’t there be an equal number of single men and single women? Please tell me what I’m missing.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:30 PM
26

Feminism itself is the motte and Bailey fallacy. On the one hand, it holds itself out as for equality, but then routinely engages in misandry
/r/MensRights29/08/22 08:28 PM
2

I could agree with a police presence to ensure the safety of everyone during the protest - but if you’re talking about banning it altogether, I’m gonna take a hard pass. I edited myprevious post which I made while you responded.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 06:28 PM
1

You didn’t actually answer my question. Are u talking about banning protests? Or are you talking about a security presence at the protest so users of the facility are not impeded.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 06:17 PM
1

What is meant by “immunity from protests”? See the Domestic Violence row 2.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 06:06 PM
1

Every field has conventional ideas that were once new ideas. Many, if not most new ideas are bad ideas. That’s why criticism is a necessary - they discredit the new but bad ideas, and prevent them from becoming conventional. Feminism cancels their critics as misogynist, racist, alt-righters. Without critics, bad ideas become conventional ideas.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/22 05:53 PM
4

That’s just a fancy way of saying that some states permit marriage before 18 with parental consent. BTW - it also applies to boys.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 04:47 PM
1

“the other day I dropped a hot air gun on my foot and burned myself on an angle grinder” I have absolutely no idea what any of those things are, but damn that sounds painful …
/r/MensRights29/08/22 02:03 PM
2

I think that the bigger issue is one of free speech. It’s true that private companies have a right to censor whatever they want. But you can even see that all of the major platforms have a heavy leftist bent. To the extent that they have rules, they are not consistently applied, and they openly ban hate speech against some groups and encourage hate speech against others. The problem is that the platforms have a huge market dominance, and cancelling someone effectively does stop their speech. Wha…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:59 PM
1

I believe there was a reality show where a women’s team went to an uninhabited island. The outcome was a disaster. Meanwhile, a men’s team went to a another similarly uninhabited island and did a pretty remarkable job.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 06:39 PM
3

Oh how the truth hurts!
/r/MensRights24/08/22 04:17 PM
3

Not near as much as Europe. It took a minor miracle for Amazon workers in one facility to vote to unionize.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 01:03 PM
6

Hey bro, I went through the argument and you were savage! They couldn’t even go two rounds without playing they went ad hominem (“you’re unhinged, blah, blah, blah”).
/r/MensRights24/08/22 12:55 PM
6

On another note, I sure do wish American workers would organize like that.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 12:32 PM
7

In the United States, apart from indigenous vegetation, there is not a single thing you can see that was not, at least once on a truck, at some point in time, including the lumbar in your house, and the concrete that forms the road.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 12:26 PM
4

Thought I saw pictures showing the amount of garbage that had collected during just two days of a twelve day bin workers strike in the UK. Maybe I’m wrong, but I’ll hazard a guess that 90% of the bin workers are men.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 12:22 PM
1

It is not often that I am at a loss for words. But anybody who agrees with this article is just straight up evil.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:54 PM
35

ArItHMeTiC iS a ToOl Of ThE pAtRiArChY!
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 02:19 AM
11

Long Beach Griffey! I love that guy - he’s hilarious . And he rally fun of cancel culture.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 02:07 AM
60

ThE aIr CoNdItIoNeR iS sExIsT!
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:22 AM
3

Yes - heavily. This goes for all litigation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/22 08:50 PM
5

Honest request - can you please provide links to the peer-reviewed sources that found bias against men. Not doubting that they exist, but would like to have them. I can tell you, as an attorney, IN ANY LITIGATION, a good and honest attorney can tell you 80%, if not 90% of the time, what will happen if you take your case to trial. So naturally, there is selection bias for cases that go to trial. Say ab judge is strongly biased in favor of mothers - the cases that go to trial before that judge wil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/22 08:49 PM
1

She’s trash, but at least the type that take itself out!
/r/AntiFeminists17/08/22 05:02 PM
2

Thank you for this! This is what I have long known from common sense and intuition as a practicing attorney, but never actually seen a study proving it.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 03:44 PM
2

It neglects the possibility of selection bias. The implication is that if all the cases went to trial, the same outcome would be achieved. That implication fails to consider that the cases that do go to trial may have the strongest fact patterns. To give an analogy, I’m sure college athletes who declare for the draft have a dramatically higher chance of player professionally than the college athletes at large. But its not the act of declaring that improves the odds - its that those who register …
/r/MensRights17/08/22 03:38 PM
2

Don’t forget Indira Gandhi.
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 01:56 AM
1

I just show them the secret patriarchy handshake, I tell them that it must be done with the right leg bent at a 45 degree angle, while chanting, “all hail, the great grand poobah of the royal order of the patriarchy”
/r/MensRights16/08/22 01:36 AM
1

Lol … one of whom beat her in straight sets with hungover
/r/AntiFeminists13/08/22 11:06 AM
1

Honest question - that seems very dangerous and looks like it takes a terrible toll on the body. Is it possible to stay in that career for more than 15 years?
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:10 AM
1

This is pretty good advice. Not without its drawbacks - but definitely has its advantages
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:05 AM
1

Traveling from the Us to another country is easy. The hard part is (1) legally staying in the new country, and (2) sustaining yourself in the new country. Getting residence in the other country is much harder. There are some countries (Panama, Costa Rica, some countries in South America), where you can get residence by bringing varying amounts of money. Others have retirement visas, but I’m guessing you are far from retirement age. But then there is also the issue of sustaining yourself. What ar…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 12:52 AM
3

From what I’ve seen, Dads don’t get angry often, but when they do, they really get angry. They give more latitude, but come down harder when the kids exceed it. Moms are always nagging about something. Break a vase while playing ball in the house - confess to your dad. Get a DUI - tell your mom first. Which is why kids need both parents.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 11:15 PM
27

The delusions people espouse to justify their shitty behavior
/r/MensRights11/08/22 03:05 PM
4

All hype. Click every single link. Not a single link to any document, or supposed smoking gun. The supposed texts with Manson - notice the article does not quote any. If they were so damning, then why not quote them? All of the documents are available online. Just another news organization deciding what our lying eyes and ears can’t see or hear
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 04:49 AM
3

Lord help us!
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/22 09:32 PM
5

Was this the article 4, free inhabitant lady?
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/22 09:12 PM
5

Good Lord! It’s a fair topic to debate. But I guess that’s not what they want - can’t disrupt their group think echo chamber.
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/22 07:31 PM
1

Lol. Ok ... that's on me and perhaps my writing leaves something to be desired! All I'm trying to say is that 50/50 statistic does not prove fairness of family court. As the statistic goes, only 5% of cases go to trial, and of those going to trial, the father wins 50% of the time. What I am trying to say is that the 5% of cases that do go to trial are cases where the facts are lopsidedly in favor of the father. Cases where the fact patterns are even don't go to trial because the father (assuming…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 10:01 PM
1

Where did I say or even imply it wasn’t?
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:43 PM
5

The link about judicial bias looks to be expired. On that topic it’s fallacy to assume that if all cases went to court (or trial) the same outcome would occur. Rather, the cases that wind up going to trial are reflective of the judges’ bias, which lawyers are keenly aware of. And that’s why 95% of custody cases settle out of court. If a judge is known to have bias for one parent, than the cases that go to trial will have facts that lopsidedly in the direction of the unfavored parent, where the r…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:16 PM
2

I’d like to debunk that canard that of the child custody cases that don’t settle - they go 50% to the father. The statistic invites the conclusion that courts are fair because if all of the cases were fully contested, the father would also win 50% of the time. This is fallacy. Selection bias is heavily at play. As an initial matter, “settled out of court” does not mean, no court involvement. There are “temporary” orders, discovery, guardian ad litems, and no shortage of pretrial conferences. The…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:03 PM
1

Doesn’t the court have an electronic filing system? Can he get an account and file it electronically?
/r/MensRights08/08/22 05:19 PM
1

Lol … the comment section is hilarious. On another note, isn’t NYP owned by Rupert Murdock who also owns the Sun that was sued in the UK - don’t journalist ethics require disclosure of that information
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 03:12 PM
2

Every time I hear about some newly discovered evidence that is a game changer in the JD/AH trial - I wind up feeling like an old lady who gets served a giant burger that turns out to be all bun
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 02:42 PM
10

You know what they say about the broken clock.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 03:55 AM
1

5 Crores Rupees is approximately US$640,000 at 78.5 Rs/US$.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/22 04:19 PM
2

A disproportionately high number of crimes committed by males, are committed by males raised without a father. If they wanted to control male sex drive, maybe they shouldn’t have kicked dads out of the picture
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 12:39 PM
1

Male sexuality is also the reason that every one of us exists, including that miserable hag. … eh … uh, ok, maybe it could use some control
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 12:33 PM
19

Wow! - talking about freezing homeless men and then calling r/ MensRights a hate group
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/22 02:01 PM
1

Not just that, but she is not even named. Honest question - is it that her name is withheld from the public or is the press banned from revealing it?
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 02:31 PM
1

That’s sexist. I thought Margaret Thatcher was a great PM. Condaleeza Rice was also pretty bad ass. VP Kamala Harris and Madame Speaker Nancy Pelosi - I don’t agree with their politics, but I do respect them.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 01:36 PM
2

Cue in them bringing up Saudi Arabia in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 …..
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 05:14 AM
13

She must have gone apocalyptic when you said that. But hey - a man having to pay child support - “should have kept it in your pants”
/r/MensRights24/07/22 12:54 AM
6

Well - it says that gender is a social construct. I think I just found the cheat code!
/r/MensRights23/07/22 10:53 PM
4

I don’t have the link, but I believe it is more like 50%. But regardless - the statistic is meaningless because of selection bias. Attorneys know the tendency of judges and can tell their clients what the outcome of trial would be in the vast majority of cases. If judge is known to have bias towards mothers than only cases with facts that are lopsided in favor of the father will be contested, while cases with balanced facts will settle with the mother getting custody. Most people do not have, mi…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:14 PM
1

Every time I hear someone criticize juries, I refer them to the circus we call the family courts.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:54 PM
3

That’s true - and judges often have a “monkey see, monkey do” attitude … with apologies to monkeys
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:51 PM
3

Yeah - the US Supreme Court is for federal law and claims based on the US Constitution. Then each state has their own highest court (usually called the “Supreme Court of the State of ______) for all state law and state constitutional. Family law, child support, are all matters of state law. I agree that it is terrible. And the worse part about it is these states independently arrived at this absurd conclusion.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:49 PM
24

And course, if there are a smaller share of women in anything of prestige, they would go apocalyptic. My God, they REALLY HATE US
/r/MensRights22/07/22 09:11 AM
1

There should be is a procedure where the accuser can admit that there accusation is false. The statement should only be usable in the defense or reversal of a conviction of a rape charge. But the statement should not be usable in subsequent charges stemming from the false accusation. Those charges should have to be proven by other evidence. Lastly - the admission should be allowed to be used as a mitigating factor during punishment.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 03:45 PM
3

Another example - it’s like thinking that North Korea is democracy of the Korean people because it’s official name is The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 05:45 AM
1

Lol! Hey Homer! Did you know that North Korea is a democracy of the Korean people? I mean, it’s literally called the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 05:35 AM
6

The APA is the statute that allows judicial review of final government agency rulings. So it looks like they abolished the appeal procedure within the agency. Yikes! That is problematic on many levels. Most administrative agencies have some process of review by an administrative law judge. This is crazy
/r/MensRights20/07/22 10:58 PM
3

But isn’t the determination by any administrative agency reviewable in court under the administrative procedures act?
/r/MensRights20/07/22 07:23 PM
14

Hey head mistress, Amber called. She wants her turd back
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 10:53 PM
17

Just like any other ad hominem attack. The person who says it has no argument
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:55 AM
8

It also assumes that cases that go to trial are representative of cases that get filed. If a judge is known to have bias in favor of mothers, then only cases that have facts that are lopsided in favor of the father will go to trial.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 02:37 PM
12

And that’s why a high win rate at trial is meaningless. If a judge is known to award custody to mother, unless there is abuse, drugs, alcohol or neglect, then only cases with abuse, drugs, alcohol or neglect will go to trial. The attorney who tells you they have never lost a trial, never lost a trial because they settle almost every time.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 02:30 PM
37

And of course, the 4% that go to trial are NOT representative of the other 96%. Lawyers who practice before a family court can easily tell you how a judge will rule on most facts patterns. If a judge is known to favor mothers, then only cases with lopsided facts in favor of the father will go to trial. Cases with even fact patterns will settle for mothers custody because people don’t have $50,000 (minimum) to spend on a fools errand. It’s an extraordinarily silly statement that just demonstrates…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 02:22 PM
5

An abortion procedure at that stage is nothing short of HORRIFIC!
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 03:52 PM
1

It won’t. It’s written by a democrat when both houses are controlled by republicans. It won’t even get to the floor.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 05:07 PM
2

It is a protest bill written by a democrat (minority party) that probably won’t come to the floor. Nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 05:04 PM
2

A good example - Amber Heard. She made an accusation of sexual assault in her op-ed. But she was not convicted of making a false accusation. And how could she be - she wasn’t under oath when she wrote the op-Ed and she didn’t make the statement to police. A jury has found that her op-Ed was false by a preponderance of evidence and, by clear and convincing evidence, written with malicious intent. Her allegation will be counted, but will not be counted as a false one.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 05:01 PM
19

During the arrest one of them assaulted the arresting officer and the other two caught a weapons charge.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 03:43 PM
2

I swear to God, anyone who disagrees with his proposals is just evil.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:03 AM
35

Ok, tell me who does care about us? It ain’t the politicians, nor the judges. Mental health entirely caters to women, even though men make up 3/4 of suicides. There are almost no shelters for men.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 02:44 AM
35

Nobody cares about men.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 02:24 AM
9

There must be misogyny in the water /s
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 07:56 PM
23

Lol! “I still have some basic human decency so go kill yourself”
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 03:37 AM
16

How fucking stupid can they be? Unless you’re washing your cash under the mattress, it’ll just stay in the bank. Then there is more for the bank to loan, which they will. Money doesn’t sleep. There’s that - and that they will probably just push their spending to the 6th.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/22 03:23 AM
25

It would be great for a parody of all feminist subs
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:34 PM
49

If a comedian has to tell you that they are funny, guess what they are not.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:33 PM
5

Lol. Like diabetes. Only worse.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 01:23 PM
4

Please keep us up to date as your complaint progresses.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:18 AM
5

Only if they’re done by a woman. If a man did that, they’d terminate his visitation.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:07 AM
6

At best - the Rs are the lesser of two evils. The lessor of two evils is still evil.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:54 PM
3

How high/drunk were you?
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 02:06 PM
4

Ever notice that most “brutally honest” people rarely ever have any compliments to give?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:54 AM
9

I think that is about right. He should apologize for calling that girls hurtful names, but the mother should also learn some tact. Her virtue signaling is disgusting
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:58 AM
1

No different than the polls of the general American population, 2:1 pro choice.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 03:37 PM
1

if she tries, it will end very badly for her 😂
/r/AntiFeminists26/06/22 12:02 AM
5

All animals are equal. Some animals are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 01:49 PM
3

I remember reading an article about it by a feminist, literally saying, “this is not what we meant by equality.” I detest the idea the alimony, period - but yeah, if they’re gonna say that it’s different when they have to pay, fuck em
/r/MensRights22/06/22 02:27 AM
4

What do you expect from the Evening Slander
/r/AntiFeminists17/06/22 02:52 AM
6

She cannot discharge the verdict because it is an intentional tort.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 02:44 AM
2

NGL - she’s got taste in cars.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 01:00 AM
7

It’s more likely an “umbrella policy.” But yes, they do cover defending for allegations of defamation. However, they will NOT cover the verdict if defamation is found to be intentional/with malice. So the policy most likely has been financing her defense (there even was even a rep from AIG who was seen at the trial every day) and most likely her legal fees for appeal.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 12:59 AM
1

Charmin ads
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/22 01:31 AM
1

FaLsE aCcUsAtIoNs ArE rArE!
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/22 01:30 AM
2

Ah yes if Y > X then X = 0 and Y = Infinity
/r/MensRights10/06/22 10:02 PM
11

They do realize that companies don’t “hire” board members. They are elected by the shareholders. So are they now telling the shareholders who they can and can’t elect to the board?
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:40 PM
2

Want to find out about us? Participate in the discussions. If you find something disagreeable, feel free to argue. Short of a few no-no’s (threatening violence, racial slurs), we don’t ban.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 03:00 PM
2

A public figure defamation trial has the highest burden of proof. There, the burden of proof was on The plaintiff to prove the falsity of the statements. In a criminal cases, the prosecutor has to prove the statements are true beyond reasonable doubt. Even to get a restraining order, the accuser has the burden of proof, albeit, a by preponderance.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 08:30 PM
1

It’s not even true that there won’t be child support. There will in a situation where one parent makes much more than the other.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 08:17 PM
1

I haven’t been able to. It’s screwy that it can sit on his desk for so long. The president has 10 days to veto before it becomes law.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 08:14 PM
33

I say this as a member of the Bar of another state - fuck the bar association
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:42 PM
6

Same here. The schadenfreude was so delicious. There’s nothing funnier than a feminist meltdown
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:29 PM
5

Can someone please tell me where journalists were appointed the great judge of the public’s morals and behavior?
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:54 AM
2

It depends whether he actually get the verdict. Bear in mind - a defamation case is VERY hard to win, especially by a public figure. MSM has written article after article calling his supporters misogynists, and completely ignoring the evidence. They make a lot of hay about the UK outcome, and if this doesn’t get a verdict, they will do the same.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 07:54 PM
4

There have been several self-identification polls on r/justiceforjohnny that show them to be 2/3 women. Granted, people could be lying, so take that for what it’s worth
/r/MensRights29/05/22 01:37 AM
25

Depp is no saint - but he is owning his flaws.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 07:43 PM
12

How long will it be before Camille Vasquez gets called a “pick me”?
/r/MensRights27/05/22 07:42 PM
25

I read somewhere that in America’s first election, 1788, only 1/4 of all men could vote. They had to be white and landowning.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 03:46 PM
2

Lol! When I first read that, I read the first sentence to mean feminists hate a woman embracing her femininity, almost as much as men hate it. But yes, this is spot on. I’ve never seen a happy feminist. Grievances is like their life blood. The hook up culture is a disaster.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/22 03:39 PM
2

Not sure what part of the world you are in, but with a death threat, have you considered applying for a restraining order?
/r/MensRights19/05/22 11:27 PM
7

And the other thing about the case is that he has so much evidence. As celebrities, they were photographed hundreds of times a day. His lawyer could pull up photographs of Amber during any time period she claimed to be abused.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 11:51 AM
5

Thank you! That was my immediate thought - there is bias, but not as much as the headline suggests. No purpose is served by exaggerating. Have an award - it’s all I had
/r/MensRights18/05/22 07:59 PM
7

There’s another even more deeper problem. Board members aren’t “hired” - they are elected by the shareholders who own the company. Telling the shareholders that they must elect women to the board is not only discrimination against men, but interferes with the very nature of a corporation.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 04:22 AM
2

It’s only for defamation. I think your question is - if a witness accuses another party of a crime during their testimony, can that form the basis of a criminal prosecution against the other party? I honestly don’t know because I’ve never heard of a prosecutor or the police, completely out of the blue start an investigation on that basis - especially when the testimony is, by it’s nature so self-serving. At the same time, I don’t know of anything that prevent a prosecutor from doing so. If the w…
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/22 06:16 PM
3

I completely fail to see that connection between drunk driving and killing people, and the fact that testimony in court is immune from suit for defamation.
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/22 05:46 PM
2

Wow. She’s going to get crucified on cross if that’s true. During the discovery, she would have been asked to list each instance of abuse and would been questioned about them during the deposition. On top of that, there is an ongoing duty to supplement and update discovery, in case you remember something that you originally didn’t So not only would she be lying now, but she also lied during her discovery.
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/22 04:29 PM
1

So is this the absolute first time she has ever said this? She didn’t say this during her deposition?
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/22 04:01 PM
6

Her testimony would be immune from defamation. Courtroom testimony, and statements that’s are made as part of any government proceedings are immune are privileged from defamation. The sole remedy is criminal charge for the false statement is perjury, filing a false police report.
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/22 02:31 PM
1

Almost as satisfying as 8-Ball!
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/22 05:02 AM
89

No. The only thing she can be charged with is perjury. But, losing this case will have no bearing on any perjury charge
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/22 10:33 PM
4

More like, “Excuse me sir, how does it feel like to get catcalled?” “It does have a way showing me the error of my ways. I’ll try to modify my behavior, but quite honestly, I’ll probably forget everything I’ve learned after a week and regress.”
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/22 03:07 AM
1

“Then two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse…” It’s a true statement. She did … as the abuser.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 04:53 AM
1

Yep! Big government is your Daddy!
/r/MensRights05/05/22 07:20 PM
4

That’s like saying all women are responsible for Amber Heard’s behavior. That’s absolutely absurd.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:51 PM
18

That sound like an ADA suit in the making.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 07:21 PM
5

Let’s go Brandon!
/r/MensRights02/05/22 07:08 PM
11

She doesn’t even have to hit herself to make bruises. Had a friend’s ex just got an ex parte order by saying the magic words - “I fear for my life.” During the 2 weeks of the ex parte order, she abducted the kids to another state. My friend didn’t see his kids until they were adults.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 04:12 AM
88

Yikes - her putting you in arrears even though you have lived together is absurd.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 09:19 PM
89

What jurisdiction? How much higher was your imputed income compared to your actual income? Are these temporary orders or final?
/r/MensRights01/05/22 09:08 PM
0

For the love of God, will they please take poor amber off of the cross, we need the wood.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 06:44 AM
12

I’m against censorship - even censorship of hate speech. I’d rather tolerate them, if we can have TRP and MGTOW back (not suggesting any equivalence).
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/22 09:49 PM
4

I think they grossly underestimated Team Depp. They probably figured that he had already lost in the UK, and that they would shred Johnny on cross-exam. The problem is that there are subtle differences, (tried to a jury, directly against Amber) that actually make things dramatically different. Then it turns out that Johnny Depp is a way smarter than they gave him credit for. And then Depp’s lawyers have presented the case in a very compelling manner.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/22 09:11 PM
2

Sarcastic says “No one cares about mens feelings?” Then proves its true by mocking them!
/r/MensRights28/04/22 04:50 PM
2

The jury first determines whether Amber Heard is liable for defamation, and similarly Johnny Depp on the counterclaim. If they find Heard liable, they determine an amount that she is liable for. Same for the counterclaim.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/22 12:25 AM
2

It’s not just market share. The whole point of social media is to allow the user too hear from and be heard by many. As the market share increases, each subsequent subscription becomes a functionally better product, because there are more users.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:56 PM
10

It is disturbing how accepting people are of censorship- as long as what is censored is an opinion they don’t agree with.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:00 PM
21

The full dirt coming is the best part. When Elon musk officially owns twitter, he’ll also own most, if not all of her work. I really he reveals twitter’s censorship
/r/MensRights27/04/22 03:04 PM
6

“We need to urgently put in place regulation that forces social media platforms to be transparent about the risks of their algorithms and redesign how they promote content so that they align with the feminist futures we want to create.” Wow! I don’t even know what to say …
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:41 PM
110

The reason that it is so hard is because the media and Hollywood have already gone “all in” on Amber Heard. They have made her an ambassador for domestic violence. It is just way too hard to back pedal now.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:53 PM
2

If the statute of limitations has expired, then it really is game over, regardless of what relief you are seeking.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 05:52 PM
4

In many jurisdictions, the statute of limitations would have expired to sue for battery.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 04:48 PM
1

See my response to the next comment.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 12:58 AM
1

Entire books have been written on collecting judgments. So I’ll give a 50,000 foot overview. Everything I’m writing is based on United States. See, except in child support, when you get a judgment, all it is is a piece of paper. The defendant doesn’t have to write you a check. So then the burden is in the judgment holder to find assets that belong to the defendant. If the assets are held by a third party, like a stock account, you have the court order the brokerage to turn the assets over. If th…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 12:58 AM
2

Defamation is an intentional tort so it cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:50 PM
5

It’s absolute bullshit. The last thing most people who are guilty will want to do is bring a defamation case. They open themselves up do discovery and cross examination. They can no longer take the 5th (or if they do, it will kill their case).
/r/MensRights21/04/22 03:09 PM
4

Damn - IIRC South Carolina (along with NC and Texas do not allow wage garnishment (except for child support, taxes, government debts and fines). So he’ll have to go after their bank accounts. He really can’t complain to the judge that they aren’t paying him. It’s not like child support. He will have to find their assets and take them if they have any - but if these three want live on minimum wage, there really is no way to make them pay. I’ll tell you what I would do. I’d kill then with post jud…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 02:55 PM
4

It depends on the state. The most common method is wage garnishment (depending on state), and levying bank accounts. There are limits on wage garnishment. Usually, only 25% of wages, but some states don’t allow it at all. As for the house, in some states, it is totally off limits, while in others, it’s fair game. Most protect the equity up to a certain amount. Most retirement plans are off limits. At least the good news for him is that the debt cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. Most likely, he…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 02:03 PM
6

FWIW, we do appreciate that you find “90% of the arguments that [you’ve] seen on this subreddit are valid.” However, we’re not trying to silence anyone. Go ahead - post here, argue with us, you won’t get banned.
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/22 06:19 PM
-1

Then just take a 30 year mortgage, but don’t pay it down and don’t cash out.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 03:48 PM
1

You do you. But it’s basically trading one risk for another. If you actually look at the numbers from your own investments, I’ll bet it’s not as scary as you think.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 03:39 PM
1

Talk to a local attorney. Laws vary widely from country to country and even from state to state. Find out if your state has a common law marriage/partner statute. If you buy a home, make sure that it is mortgaged (take the 30 year, not the 15). As the equity builds, cash out refinance, so that there is always very little equity in the house. Invest the proceeds in an index fund or other investment, so that it, at the least offsets the interest on the mortgage.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 02:49 PM
28

On behalf of the American Indians, we respectfully decline. There isn’t simply don’t make enough whiskey to make that possible. Perhaps choose the Jews. On behalf of Jews, we respectfully decline. Our guy from Nazareth already took one for the team. Someone else shall have to be chosen.
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/22 12:24 AM
1

I think your comment was removed. I can’t find it on the thread, anywhere.
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/22 07:33 PM
1

But as the president cannot be younger than 35, and the youngest elected president was 43 (JFK), a pregnant president seems unlikely.
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/22 04:03 PM
2

So what happened? Reddit must have gone apocalyptic!
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/22 02:46 PM
1

You just do as much as you can and they don’t worry about the rest.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/22 06:34 PM
1

Well done responding to her ridiculous post.
/r/AntiFeminists13/04/22 03:59 PM
3

Well done! and women’s shelters exist because of public funding, not “strong independent women”
/r/AntiFeminists13/04/22 03:30 PM
10

InTeRnAlIzEd MySoGy!
/r/MensRights13/04/22 01:51 PM
26

You’re not wrong, but this is a civil defamation trial. Only monetary damages will be awarded.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 05:47 PM
30

In Texas, that’s mostly true, but not 100% true. Texas does have a limited alimony statute (barring disability, after a 30+ year marriage, the absolute maximum is 10 years, $5000/month) which is also very hard to get awarded. The standard is “minimum reasonable requirements” as opposed to “accustomed standard of living.” But yes, in 95% of cases, even asking for it is a fool’s errand.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 03:05 PM
1

Reddit Logic: If you disagree with me you are a Nazi, because I am against Nazis.
/r/AntiFeminists08/04/22 03:35 PM
2

She can continue the wrongful death lawsuit. It’s a civil case and the lack of criminal conviction is almost irrelevant. Famous example, OJ Simpson - acquitted for murder, but hit with a $29M verdict for wrongful death
/r/MensRights08/04/22 02:38 PM
6

It looks like the school did settle with him.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:23 PM
12

And don’t forget, the verdict is against the false accuser, her father, and her friend. Also, since defamation is an intentional tort, it cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. Also, depending on state, he can also garnish part of their wages.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:02 PM
5

I don’t disagree. I just think that your point would be better without referring to Nazis. Sure, to those who already agree with you, it resonates. But too a wider audience, this just demonstrates Godwin’s law. I prefer the analogy to McCarthy. The similarities are scary. Instead of “I have a list”, there are fabricated SA stats, instead of blacklists you get canceled, instead of “I am not now, nor have I ever been a communist” you have this pronoun nonsense.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 02:58 PM
16

It’s got to be perjury, if she testified under oath. I don’t know about Australia, but in the United States, making a false statement to the police, whether under oath or not, is also a crime.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 02:29 PM
2

Well, that and it also doesn’t have the 11 million dead.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 02:24 PM
4

Calling it Nazism is a obviously hyperbolic. I think a much more helpful and apt analogy is the “McCarthyism” of the left. It does operate very similarly.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 01:43 PM
3

(1) get a lawyer (2) change all of your passwords (3) check your joint bank accounts - do what your lawyer tells you - hopefully she hasn’t withdrawn all the money or doesn’t before you see a lawyer (4) stay away from Facebook and WhatsApp - if you want to talk, face to face or phone call, but be careful with texting. (5) if you are in a country with broad civil discovery laws (like the US) assume that anything you do online with your smartphone and personal computer is being watched (6) don’t p…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 08:26 PM
6

It’s colloquially called the “Baker Act.” And “Baker acted” is slang for mental health detainment in the US.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 06:28 PM
10

What country are they in? In the United States, the protective order is probably his best bet. Cops are useless, and in the United States generally hate domestic disturbances. Is he represented by an attorney? An attorney who knows the judge well would be well worth it.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 02:06 PM
2

Feminists: 90% of violent criminals are men. That’s proof that men are violent. Also Feminists: 95% of Fortune 500 CEOs are men. That’s proof of discrimination.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 01:52 PM
8

All the more so, considering that English is not her first language, and most likely not even her second language.
/r/AntiFeminists17/03/22 01:06 AM
3

Clearly the result of having never been told "no" in her life. If it had been a man, the tasers and pepper spray would have come out immediately, if not the guns. I do feel a little bit sympathy for her. Not for catching a felony charge. But, for the 2M views. Oh boy - she's gonna be legend, just like that sovereign citizen gal.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 03:21 PM
2

Congrats! Damn. I need to up my game.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 07:13 PM
3

That's exactly like what we call "one party consent" laws that a majority of states have.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 12:21 AM
1

Dude, I was just taking a snarky dig at the Twitter poster for having her math wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 01:42 PM
4

But one thing they will never expand the term to mean - anything that woman can do.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 03:09 AM
2

That's a fair point and worth discussing. But making it a gendered issue is dishonest.
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 02:51 PM
2

The post demonstrates that there is one gender gap in education. Women seem to be getting an inferior education. I mean, they can't even do basic mathematics
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 02:47 PM
1

Technically, yes. As a practical matter, no. Depending on state and level, the statues do say it is up to 6 months or 1 year. As a practical matter, it's not common. To begin with, most of these sentences are to scare people into pleading out instead of going to trial. Even then, the sentences are usually suspended and probated, like 60 days, suspended, and probated to two years supervision, etc.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 09:15 PM
16

Please tell me this is satire.
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 08:45 PM
3

Get a recording - preferably video, if you can. Post it to whatever social media Indian foreign students use, and be sure to name the university. I'll bet the university gets a lot of money from foreign students. Hit em in the pocketbook.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 07:30 PM
3

What's depressing is that it was only women who stood up for the boy.
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 02:10 PM
93

Please, do not fall for that. It's not always even in her hands. If she applies for welfare, she has to assign at least a portion of her right to child support to the state. So it could be the state coming after you.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 12:20 AM
12

Sorry this happened to you. On the bright side of things - you didn't marry her. Imagine the hell that and a divorce would have been.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 12:44 PM
9

Good God, I also made the mistake of looking at it. She is an absolute train wreck!
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 04:51 AM
15

Child support is enforced by contempt of court where you don't get a jury. The child support racket figured that one out a long time ago.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 05:17 AM
30

More like "how to be a cuck."
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/22 06:07 PM
2

now over 42,000. I usually don't put much into these, but this one has really taken off.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 05:49 PM
23

Very badly written article. TLDR - Men are standing up for their rights and that is dangerous because men are standing up for their rights.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 04:20 AM
5

I was also thinking about that guy who live streamed killing his ex wife and girlfriend.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/22 10:31 PM
3

I believe it. As generalization, to which there are always exceptions, from what I’ve seen, when guys fight each other, they mainly want to win. They don’t usually kick em while they’re down and will take a “tap out.” But when women, especially teenage girls fight, they want to hurt each other.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 04:18 AM
3

That's terrible! It's not even like $40k is a ton of money. I think alimony for any more than the cost of a four year public college education ought to be abolished - and I take no pleasure when women have to pay it, either.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 04:13 AM
3

Is this about a gynecologist in Florida?
/r/MensRights13/01/22 03:35 AM
1

I really hope she gets arrested and learns her lesson. What she's doing works every time but once. And I don't wish that on anyone.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 04:50 PM
2

Honestly, the most immediate thing you can do is let the man/men (father, brother, husband, as the case may be) know how much you appreciate them and their role in your life.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 04:45 PM
1

Feminism is as much about equality as North Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, is a democracy of the Korean people.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:33 PM
11

The PROTECT Act removed the intent requirement. See 18 USC 2324(c) and compare it to section (b).
/r/MensRights10/01/22 05:45 AM
35

You are right that she can be prosecuted, but it’s a little more complicated than that. Generally, US law does not apply outside of The US, per se. However, IIRC, the PROTECT Act of 2003 specifically forbids an American citizen/resident from having sex with a minor outside the US, regardless of whether it is legal in that country.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 04:28 AM
19

Is there a security camera there? Always stay where the security camera is watching Another thing, if it looks inevitable that she is going to call the cops, call the cops first on her for loitering. When they get there, be sure to be the one that talks to the officer first. In these situations - being first to tell your side is a big advantage - of course it's no guarantee, but improves your odds
/r/MensRights06/01/22 11:25 PM
13

What does the custody agreement say about medical decisions?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 11:21 PM
10

So feminism really is cancer
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/22 03:20 PM
5

They're the ones who have to go on without their husbands, sons, and fathers.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 03:38 PM
35

Mad respect for this guy. Is it just me or does she look like she's wearing a prison jump suit?
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 12:13 AM
1

Honest question - where did you get that the shooter was a police officer?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 11:42 PM
1

Kindness by weak people isn't virtuous at all because they have no other choice. Typical "(not really) nice guy" behavior. Notice the poster closes: "Raise good men. Raise strong women."
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/21 11:14 PM
13

Lol - now he's an incel for turning her down. That is literally the opposite of incel.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/21 05:37 AM
3

The case is over. The case being over means that the underlying controversy is settled. The Supreme Court interprets and applies the Constitution in the context of a controversy that is based on an actual injury particularized to a person. The actual injury in this case was the threat of criminal penalty to plaintiffs Lesmeister and Davis for failure to update their address. Lesmeister and Davis will need to continue updating their address Additionally - to settle the controversy, the 5th Circui…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 02:59 PM
1

"I dunno cuz they dummy" must be the most ironic sentence I've seen written in a long time.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 05:00 PM
4

This new Ontario law is already the law in many of the United States and has been for a long time. Also, not sure about Ontario, but the decedent's spouse is not completely cut out - in many of not all states, they do get what is known as an elective share or a share of the marital estate.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 02:49 PM
-51

I honestly think that's kind of harsh. She deserved to be arrested, and have Delta refuse service - but never flying again for the rest of her life is excessive.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/21 10:19 PM
32

She'll never fly on Delta again. I also hear she double went to jail.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/21 08:11 PM
2

Was a lifelong democrat - even voted for Hillary. But I've seen how child support and alimony do nothing but punish success. I've seen how feminism makes individual behavior irrelevant - all that matters is female > male. It has forced me to the examine my previously socialist leanings. Trump had my vote all the way up until COVID (I voted libertarian in the end), but will be voting for him in 2024. I satirically joke with my liberal friends that feminism pushed me to the dark side.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 01:32 PM
41

True. But even calling this fallacy is generous. Fallacies actually are at least colorable arguments that upon more careful inspection unravel. What's funny is the fools actually think they are authorities.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:21 PM
9

Never could understand that. The ability to carry life is like the ace of all trump cards, but feminists can't throw it in the discard pile fast enough.
/r/AntiFeminists25/12/21 01:34 PM
1

Here's a link to a story. Be prepared to have your blood boil! Corruption at every level. Pure evil. https://www.reviewjournal.com/crime/courts/ex-nevada-guardian-to-serve-up-to-40-years-behind-bars-1565690/amp/
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/21 11:23 PM
1

The movie is a comedy. I believe it was based on a woman in Nevada who perpetrated a similar scheme.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/21 08:40 PM
5

Yeah you messed up. But look at the bright side - you didn't marry her or have kids with her. You're still young so you'll recover. Consider this one of life's lessons. If it makes you feel better - I guarantee in year or two, that chump she's with now will be exactly where you are, when she pulls the same shit again.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 05:25 PM
7

Honest question - his child support obligation is 5000 shekels/month which comes ~US$1500 or AUS$2200 per month. Times 12 months and 18 years it would come to US$350,000 or ÀUS$500,000, not even counting present discounted value. Where do they get the sum of $3.5M?
/r/MensRights24/12/21 05:04 PM
4

Unfortunately, we have this terrible thing in america called Judicial Immunity. It's 1000 times worst than qualified immunity. It prevents civil lawsuits against a judge for any judicial act, no matter how contrary it is to the law or constitution.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 06:39 PM
3

The same way intent is determined for every other crime.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 02:26 PM
46

Do not feel guilty for not making more money and not giving her financial support. She is a grown adult and can make her own money. If she senses any guilt - guaranteed - she will manipulate you into giving her money. Apparently, other people s money seems to be a business model for her as evidenced by the fact that she tried to take you to the cleaners. And always think of your daughter, first. You're doing great so far. Good luck!
/r/MensRights22/12/21 10:59 AM
10

Wasn’t it her husband that came out of the closet?
/r/MensRights22/12/21 02:04 AM
9

Chances are, it’s only against his assets that are in the UK or any other jurisdiction that will honor a UK court judgment.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 01:30 AM
6

To add, he also was doing 85 mph and four people were killed. The 110 years was the minimum sentence because he was convicted of something like 20 separate crimes and the sentence for each has to be served consecutively. The minimum. Of each crime added up to 110 years. I think essentially life is too much. But he should definitely do at least a decade. Perhaps the Governor should commute to the maximum sentence on the single most serious charge.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 07:24 PM
5

Doesn't even pass the straight face test
/r/MensRights20/12/21 09:52 PM
18

Whatever you do - don't hack your ex's account. In addition to being obviously illegal and possibly being a violation of the restraining order - you will not be able to use anything there as evidence. If there is something that is actually useful, you should have the judge subpoena them. This is very unethical behavior by your attorney, advising you too commit a crime. After this case is done, you really should report him to the bar.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 05:39 PM
1

OOOOOOH SAVAGE! ROTFLMAO!
/r/MensRights20/12/21 03:58 PM
4

This seems like a good idea and I've wondered why more people don't do it. Giving the school the court order and telling them whose custody to release the child seems like a much better approach. I'm genuinely curious - did it raise any other issues that were unexpected?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 03:06 PM
2

Honestly, this sounds like a good idea and would take the burden off of the police department. It is an area that has unique issues, where a person with very specific training and experience would do better. I'm no cop, but I'd imagine that this is probably the kind of work that the police department enjoys the least. I'm sure it's not a panacea, but it seems like a good idea.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 03:01 PM
23

and even Cher. "without Sonny, there would be no Cher" - her https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0326188/reviews
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/21 03:48 AM
3

It was. Demi Moore's acting was brilliant.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 01:09 AM
5

Yep - him and demi Moore.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 12:51 AM
6

Amazing - on the one hand they complain about this, and then OTOH, what is their go to insult - "incel" - which is literally, someone who doesn't have this problem.
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/21 04:28 PM
28

Or a war or a perceived threat to our national security. Not sure which is worse - another Patriot act or this woke nonsense.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 03:13 PM
14

Lol! I think you meant California.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 04:47 AM
26

I'm truly sorry to hear what you are going through. Let me be clear - I am not trying to tell you what to do right now - I don't know you or your circumstances. But maybe this story will make you feel better. Had a friend whose wife literally kidnapped their kids to another state. Despite visitation rights, the courts would do nothing. Didn't see his kids for years. A few months after his oldest son turned 18, he found my friend on Facebook. My friend told him everything and even showed all the …
/r/MensRights14/12/21 03:31 PM
22

r/fuckyoukaren
/r/MensRights14/12/21 12:56 PM
2

Is it possible - or have you already - collected statistical data using FOIA requests?
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:37 PM
7

This quote just sums up female entitlement: “I think it’s important to go back to: Why was alimony created in the first place?” Michelle says. “It’s not just as simple as saying, ‘Because men pay it, women should pay it, too.’ ”
/r/MensRights10/12/21 03:47 AM
2

I think the fallacy is thinking “more” = “many”. I mean if those statistics are true, then for every violent female convict, the are eight men. Certainly more, since more is a relative term. But it’s not many. Even if your stats undercount by a factor of 10, that’s still 99.84% of men that are not violent.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 03:23 AM
8

And don't forget custodial interference. In many states, that is a crime.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:19 PM
1

Most likely contempt of court. Not licensed in Australia, but American courts can use jail to force compliance with court orders.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 03:50 PM
17

And made a cellmate with someone he previously sentenced. Quite befitting for a family court judge to become their cellie's new wife, no?
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:13 PM
1

Well, the advice about weed was pretty good…
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:49 AM
5

I thought I saw a survey a few weeks ago showing that even 46% of Korean women don't support feminism.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 08:55 PM
2

Men lose 80% of curiosity battles. Lol! I think you meant custody battles. Though we probably lose a lot curiosity battles, too, cause we never ask for directions : )
/r/MensRights01/12/21 12:40 AM
4

Given your appreciation of the concerns that your partner has in forming a family, I think you'll do fine. Just be sure to have open and honest communication. I think not getting married is a great idea, as it really just another way to bring government into your lives. Some states have common law marriage so be sure to check with an attorney in your state. And if yours has it, find out to avoid it (such as not holding yourselves out as married, filling separate tax returns, etc).
/r/MensRights29/11/21 12:38 PM
22

Cause some of us love children?
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:13 PM
6

I’ve been following that issue for a while now. I even submitted my request to join your Facebook group which is pending. Someone told me that you can enforce visitation by filing a habeas corpus petition (I’ll try to find the link). Have any your members been able to do that?
/r/MensRights28/11/21 12:45 AM
2

Custodial Interference. Texas Penal Code 25.03. That’s a state jail felony.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 11:54 PM
1

Thanks for the info!
/r/MensRights27/11/21 04:51 PM
4

If I may ask, what locale in Texas are in? The habeas corpus sounds like a good idea, are you able to get the court date fast?
/r/MensRights27/11/21 04:35 PM
2

I was agreeing with you. It is almost impossible for laypersons to actually know all the facts about any current event without investing time they usually don’t have. That’s what I was trying to tell the other guy. It’s unreasonable to demand the degree of knowledge of an advocate in the Supreme Court merely to talk about a current event.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 08:16 AM
2

If you want to see how scandalous it is, just watch either of these videos. Whether it was self defense or not - if Texas would just enforce visitation rights, horrible situations like this wouldn’t happen. https://kfoxtv.com/news/special-assignments/special-report-interference-with-child-custody-not-enforced-in-texas https://youtu.be/OWomzPsNrHE
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:51 AM
2

Texas generally has joint managing conservators (JMC), where one has the right to name the primary residence of the child. The default custody arrangement is what is known as the Standard Possession Order - the father (90% of the times, it’s the father) gets the kids every other weekend and Thursday night dinner. Interference with custody is a state jail felony (Texas Penal Code 25.03) but it is not enforced.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:46 AM
2

Dude, chill! It’s Reddit. Not the United States Supreme Court
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:27 AM
-7

This post has nothing to do with Kyle Rittenhouse. It’s about Kyle Caruth of Lubbock, TX.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 06:45 AM
13

And don’t forget, Kyle’s mom. I hear she’s a bitch.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 06:23 AM
126

And maybe if Texas would actually start enforcing Texas Penal Code 25.03, which makes interference with child custody a state jail felony, situations like this wouldn't happen. But mother's know they can play games with impunity and every man has his breaking point. WCGW?! https://kfoxtv.com/news/special-assignments/special-report-interference-with-child-custody-not-enforced-in-texas https://youtu.be/OWomzPsNrHE
/r/MensRights27/11/21 05:11 AM
15

I think suspect that physical appearance is a case of very steeply diminishing returns. That and personality/intelligence actually affect physical appearance. I once was assigned a secretary who I swore was a perfect 10 when I first saw her. But - she thought our nations capitol surrounded Seattle, and then prepared a letter from my dictation, which included the words "skip a line." That and whole host of other things and she wasn't even physically attractive. Can't speak for everyone, but that'…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 09:01 PM
8

Here's an interview with her. The bowling group seemed okay with it. https://youtu.be/Ip7kP_dd6LU
/r/MensRights26/11/21 04:54 PM
2

Because the law takes the view that children are not property whose custody can be bought and sold. It also takes the view that child support is for the benefit of the child (Lol!), and therefore neither parent can bargain that away. If it is a gay marriage, then to you can try to arrange it so that the nonbiological parent does not adopt the child. Assets in a gay marriage are split no differently than in a hetero marriage, except for the systemic bias for women. To add - I'm talking about most…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 04:35 PM
120

She does,. Here's an interview that she did after releasing the book,. She admits that it's a privilege to be a women,. There's a part at the end when she is asked if women understand the things that men go through - without hesitation, "not a clue," https://youtu.be/Ip7kP_dd6LU
/r/MensRights26/11/21 01:55 PM
1

This is not do it yourself territory. For one to work, you really need to have an attorney, and, she also needs to sign it represented by another attorney. It also cannot cover custody and child support.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 01:00 PM
11

I’m not sure what to make of this. But custodial interference is a state jail felony. Texas Penal Code 25.03. That’s not just “a civil matter.” Sadly, the police don’t make arrests for it and the DAs won’t prosecute it. And sure - go to court and I’m sure the judge will give her a stern talking to, three months later. Whether it’s self defense or not - if Texas would actually enforce visitation rights, these sorts of situations wouldn’t happen. https://kfoxtv.com/news/special-assignments/special…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:23 AM
7

Congratulations on your pregnancy! Great job standing up to everyone.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 04:42 PM
1

Can you give some highlights of these bills?
/r/MensRights25/11/21 01:29 PM
0

I once knew a prosecutor that called the difference between what was offered in the plea bargain and the draconian sentence he would seek at trial, “rent on the courthouse.”
/r/MensRights22/11/21 04:21 PM
4

It was not the US Supreme Court - it was the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 04:49 PM
3

A real no-good Scotsman!
/r/MensRights18/11/21 09:22 PM
1

That film was abuse … to anyone who watched it. It was really that bad
/r/MensRights18/11/21 08:01 PM
1

I am glad to hear that there is a movement to limit judicial immunity, because some judges really think they are kings. Here is one case I’ve been following closely that may demonstrate the absurd bounds of judicial immunity. A West Virginia family judge in the middle of a hearing moved it to the inside of the husbands house! https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/39184443/Gibson_v_Goldston_et_al The judge was reprimanded by the judicial commission, but is claiming judicial immunity from the c…
/r/MensRights18/11/21 04:45 PM
2

Yeah - judicial immunity is unbelievable. Judges can get away with completely violating your rights and are immune from civil suit. Eh - you might want to edit the “non-lethal advice” bit : )
/r/MensRights18/11/21 03:33 PM
7

WoMeN mOsT aFfEcTeD!
/r/MensRights15/11/21 01:45 PM
2

WoMeN mOsT aFfEcTeD
/r/MensRights12/11/21 09:50 PM
1

No I’m not. I’m saying that the fact that mass murder being worse than closing the borders is an argument in defense of DTJ, but not one for her friend.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 02:31 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 01:48 PM
4

Thank you! And fixed.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 03:49 AM
14

Thats an argument that would acquit DJT, but not her friend. If anything it indicts her friend Edit: corrected “his” to “her”
/r/MensRights12/11/21 02:45 AM
13

They both involve judging the many by the actions of a few using a candy analogy.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 02:36 AM
15

Preventing them from entering the country. That would actually make the statement by Trump more benign
/r/MensRights12/11/21 02:32 AM
25

As to her statement about chocolates “If I had a bowl of skittles and I told you just three would kill you, would you take a handful?'' "That's our Syrian refugee problem." -Donald Trump Jr. Just replace “Syrian refugee” with “men.” And here’s a nice little graphic https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37416457.amp Bet they never thought they had so much in common with Trump’s son.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 01:01 AM
2

It’s in civil court.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 11:27 PM
1

It was the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings. I was a liberal democrat back then, and didn’t support him. But I was shocked at how people were automatically willing to believe Anita Hill without even listening to any evidence.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 10:49 PM
2

Honestly - unless you are downloading pleadings, it is very hard to run up more than $10 in costs. IIRC, you can see the case numbers, which court it is in and the case docket for free. You can glean a lot of info from the court docket.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 07:45 PM
2

Go to pacer.gov - you will need to set up an account. A lot of it is free. There are somethings on it that are not completely free, but quite cheap ($0.10/page). I’m sorry to hear that you are going through this, and I wish you the best of luck. And thank you for your work on fathers rights!
/r/MensRights09/11/21 06:45 PM
1

I absolutely have to address this canard that just won’t die. While conceding that in 92% of parent separations the child goes to the mother, The author says “Only 4% of custody cases go to trial and only 1.5% are resolved there. [17] In disputed custody cases, fathers win custody 70% of the time…”. This invites the conclusion that if the other 92% are contested, you would get similar results. The logical fallacy lies with assuming the 4% that are contested are representative of the other 96%. I…
/r/MensRights09/11/21 04:19 AM
9

Feminist - Men have been oppressing women for centuries with their patriarchy. Patriarchy is a system created by men to benefit men by oppressing women. Men - we get drafted, suffer 9/10ths work related casualties, and the deck is stacked against us in family court. Feminist - you know, all of those problems are caused, directly or indirectly, by patriarchy
/r/MensRights09/11/21 01:47 AM
28

It's more like this: Feminist - Patriarchy is a system created by men to benefit men by oppressing women. Men - we have problems, X, Y, and Z Feminist - All of those problems are caused by patriarchy
/r/MensRights08/11/21 11:01 PM
58

Women have a problem. Men’s fault. Men have a problem Women most affected and Men’s fault.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 05:04 PM
2

Agree very much. If a person is so much of a threat that they need to be on a registry, kept away from schools and playgrounds - they need to be in prison
/r/MensRights08/11/21 04:29 PM
2

Good God - the second comment is cringe AF. Men that want kids don’t expect you to do a damn thing you don’t want to do. Men that want kids are looking for women that also want kids.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 02:00 PM
-3

Lol! I post at BCND a fair amount of times. That’s where I go when shit in this sub upsets me. I literally have to got to a sub and hate on cops, so I can get my mind off of hating on feminists!
/r/MensRights07/11/21 07:38 AM
-1

I like the numbers you picked! 1312!
/r/MensRights07/11/21 07:14 AM
13

He later did press charges. I put a link to the post below.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 07:12 AM
11

Here’s a link https://www.reddit.com/r/LetsNotMeet/comments/ae9pp9/sociopath_kidnapper_in_supermarket_parking_lot/ Edit: removed the google part
/r/MensRights07/11/21 06:56 AM
3

And don’t forget qualified immunity.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 06:41 AM
1

I’m not talking about making an explicit request. I think that last sentence is implied. What I am trying to say is that whenever these arguments occur, the arguments are not presented in a manner to convince the opponent. As you said - people usually have an unmet need - and the politics are born of that unmet need. Address your opponents unmet need and it’s possible to change their mind, or at least make progress. But we don’t. And the reason we don’t is because we are more interested in makin…
/r/MensRights05/11/21 10:21 PM
2

The problem with online blogs is that no one is really trying to change minds - they are trying to make others look bad. The end result of this dumpster fire of a conversation was that both parties saw even less merit in the others position.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 03:28 PM
3

Very sad. Man fights for his country and then his wife and family court stab him in the back - worse than any terrorist ever could.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 02:21 PM
1

Sarcastic. Meaning the post that precedes it is sarcastic.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 04:18 PM
6

Knew it was India before I even clicked the link.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 03:41 AM
1

I know that. Jeez, I put a /s tag on it!
/r/MensRights01/11/21 12:48 AM
2

WoMeN mOsT aFfEcTeD
/r/MensRights29/10/21 02:31 PM
3

I started reading your link. This one blurb jumped out at me: “The most common analytical mistake people make when discussing the gender wage gap is to assume that as long as it is measured “correctly,” it will tell us precisely how much gender-based discrimination affects what women are paid.” Wait - isn’t that the whole point of surveys? Control all other variables and isolate one. Then based on the outcome, conclude the affect isolated variable
/r/MensRights29/10/21 06:44 AM
3

You actually raise a very good point. You ever notice that the jury verdicts are guilty/not guilty rather then guilty/innocent? There’s a good reason for that - the sole question for the jury is, did the prosecution prove the defendant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt. If the answer is no, then the verdict is “not guilty.” And that’s all the blind lady of justice writes. But I think your question is - was it unreliable evidence or that the defense proved an alternate set of facts that makes a fin…
/r/MensRights29/10/21 06:06 AM
1

Is she an American/German dual citizen? - if she’s not a German citizen, what is her legal status in Germany?
/r/MensRights29/10/21 02:09 AM
2

In what country was he born? US or Germany.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 03:29 PM
3

This is a very good video. Honestly, every man should watch this. TLDW: family law attorney explains why the child support system is broken using the case of LA. LA successfully went to court to get both 50/50 legal and physical custody of his three children and his child support was terminated. The next week baby momma (BM) applies for welfare benefits. She commits welfare fraud by saying LA abandoned them. LA gets a letter saying that California is opening a new child support case on him with …
/r/MensRights28/10/21 01:50 AM
43

Please - DO NOT a have kids with this “lady”
/r/MensRights28/10/21 01:26 AM
5

Wtaf? FEMINISTS thought that it is all right for a 40 year old man to have sex with a 12 year old girl? That is every level of messed up. Not that it is any more messed then if the genders are reversed, or any other permutation. It’s just that that is the last thing I’d expect to hear from a feminist.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 06:08 PM
5

Does that include also include girls as well as boys?
/r/MensRights27/10/21 05:37 PM
1

Yeah - I think there is a catch all defense about risk of harm (including psychological) to the child if returned - which, if applied broadly, can be used to prevent any return. It would be interesting (and probably depressing!) to see statistics on the outcome of Hague Convention cases, broken down by whether the applicant is mother or father.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 04:13 PM
1

BTW - the US returns 90% of children in Hague convention cases. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1187&context=cjil (see page 248).
/r/MensRights27/10/21 03:19 PM
0

Ok fine. Don’t follow the treaties Poland signs. Just don’t complain when Polish citizens in the US are never allowed to take their children to see family in Poland. Last I checked, there are way more Poles in the United States than Americans in Poland.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 02:09 PM
0

Honestly - this is a situation where I really would consider hiring a gangster. Probably cheaper than a lawyer.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 07:59 AM
6

Not the first time. https://www.international-divorce.com/Poland-International-Child-Abduction.htm Hopefully this case will cause the courts in other countries to recognize that Poland does not follow its Hague Convention responsibilities. That way they’ll stop allowing Polish parents to take the children to Poland. Harsh to Polish parents who don’t abduct their children, but that’s on the Polish government.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 07:47 AM
4

I can sort see her point. He does look pretty mediocre.
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/21 01:07 AM
3

I wrote the responding post and the screenshots omit the /s tag.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 04:17 PM
4

That was me, the “feminist.” If you are going to put the screen shots, at least include the /s on my post!
/r/MensRights25/10/21 04:02 PM
2

You really can’t stop mansplaining, can you? Edit: /s
/r/MensRights25/10/21 02:28 AM
2

There is no such thing as choice with gender based power imbalance.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 02:23 AM
10

“Who they gonna call when pipes freeze? Not women! Who they gonna call when electricity goes out? Not women!” But that pipes freeze and electricity goes out is because of patriarchy. So of course a man would fix it. The patriarchy creates pipes that freeze and electricity that goes out to give men jobs as plumbers and electricians. That along with the air conditioner being set for the male body temperature is proof of the patriarchal system of men oppressing women. “Heres my point EVERY SINGLE l…
/r/MensRights24/10/21 07:00 PM
4

Little sister is baiting you. She is trying to get a rise out of you and get you angry. Anger leads to making stupid decisions. The kind that lead to legal problems that can fuck up your life. Don’t take the bait. Block all of them. No phone calls. No texts. And why would you anyways? She’s your ex! As in, you broke off the relationship for a reason. By responding to her sister, you’re continuing a relationship (of sorts). Move on. Consider this episode a life lesson. Be careful with women and v…
/r/MensRights24/10/21 05:07 PM
11

OP, this is very good advice!
/r/MensRights23/10/21 04:54 PM
10

You forgot “Women most affected …”
/r/MensRights19/10/21 04:09 PM
8

In all seriousness - this is much to do about nothing. Justice Sotomayor feels like she gets interrupted too much. So they’ll make some dumb rules that she shall not be interrupted. As a practical matter - whatever rule they make will be unenforceable against any of the other justices. As for male attorneys - honestly - it is bad idea to interrupt any of the nine that will be deciding your case. There is no issue about male attorneys interrupting female attorneys, or vice versa, because Supreme …
/r/MensRights19/10/21 01:41 PM
17

I guess that means that a female attorney no longer has to follow the rules of evidence because a male attorney can’t make an objection.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 12:24 PM
10

None. Cause the bulb doesn’t have the socket’s consent.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 03:10 AM
69

I’m surprised they don’t ask if the plug has consent from the power outlet every time they plug in an appliance. Or does the outlet identify as a male, and the plug as female. And then there’s still the issue of the sexist air conditioning
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:33 PM
273

Ok - fine - then go without heating. Hopefully they’re toilets and sinks never get backed up either. Cause most plumbers are men. Better make sure the cable and wiring never wears out either. Cause most electricians are men.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 04:31 PM
7

I can understand why you don’t want to be a house wife. The chores strike me as mind numbingly boring. But - and this not a rhetorical question - why do you think being a housewife will get a woman beaten - or, put another way, why do you think having a career will prevent you them from being beaten?
/r/MensRights16/10/21 09:33 PM
1

That’s basically me. I’m reluctantly on the right. This last election was the first time I didn’t vote Democrat. If Trump runs in 2024, I’m voting for him. It’s official - feminism turned me to the dark side.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 04:48 PM
3

Or even crazier - imagine how many LTR or married couples pound down a bottle of wine or bubbly to get in the mood. Is every single one of those rape?
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 09:34 PM
46

So then it basically comes down to tribalism. And since the male tribe seems bond so well (LOL!), women need a 9:1 advantage in numbers for her tribe to win. Uh - ok! Not exactly flattering to women …
/r/MensRights12/10/21 12:13 AM
6

It wasn’t. But I see that the comments have taken a different trajectory since this morning. Glad they put out the dumpster fire.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 11:32 PM
11

That was absolutely cringe worthy. And props to Tyson for taking the question … well … like a champ! Although Tony Ferguson’s response during the press conference with Khabib would have been perfectly called for. Was a great fight. Props to Wilder too for making into the 11th round. I really thought he was done after the first knockdown.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 01:34 PM
4

I remember quite a few signs for Daniel Shaver at many of their protests. And they seemed to be well received.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 01:12 PM
28

I made the mistake of reading the comments to the article. What an absolute dumpster fire.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 12:25 PM
25

The same reason they the KKK hates hearing about George Floyd
/r/MensRights11/10/21 11:44 AM
10

It’s apparently sexist because it isn’t completely covered by school hours - so the obvious solution is to extend school hours to 9 to 5, which means that teachers, the vast majority of whom are women, would have to work longer hours
/r/MensRights08/10/21 01:15 AM
11

I can’t believe no one has brought that the air conditioning is sexist
/r/MensRights08/10/21 01:10 AM
3

I’m not sure this is very persuasive. It could be that the DAs office is more selective in bringing felony sex crime cases. It is a lot like that argument that family court is fair, because when men contest custody, they get it about half the time. (90% of the time they don’t, or settle - the 10% that are contested have unusually strong facts in their favor)
/r/MensRights06/10/21 12:32 PM
5

Looks like the mods just proved you right. Is the irony completely lost on them?
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:23 PM
3

Even crazier - what if the pregnancy was an unwanted accident at first - but then mother decides to have it. Mother and father become very happy parents. Can a random person sue the father because the pregnancy was unwanted when it happened.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 10:04 PM
7

She’s 37. Let’s see how much she like menopause.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 08:38 AM
6

Just speaking for the United States, this is not such a bad thing. 80% of college degree plans are a waste of money, … and a lot of money. In the 20% that isn’t, like engineering and computer science, there is no shortage of men.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 08:33 AM
15

I saw her post history - her last one was asking about the proper dosages of shrooms. The hallucinagins do can make you paranoid - I’m just saying
/r/MensRights23/09/21 11:35 PM
37

Did you see her ridiculous response to this argument - as if murders of males are not a problem when the perpetrator is the gender.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 10:27 PM
1

These laws were passed over a hundred years ago and haven’t been enforced in many, many years, but nobody has bothered to revoke them. In the state of New York, there have been fewer than a dozen prosecutions under the statute in the last fifty years. Interesting thing - the fact that the statute remains on the books would allow an adulterer to take the fifth under oath - even though he really faced no practical likelihood of prosecution. Honestly, nothing to see here …
/r/MensRights23/09/21 08:07 AM
2

All they ever want to talk about is rape. As if there aren’t other reasons that this law is problematic - lack of a standing requirement, over broad reach, etc. But no - they have to make it about rape. It must be truly exhausting thinking about rape 24/7/365.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 01:09 PM
2

All I can say is this - there’s not a safer place to be dirt than whatever place that is.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:25 PM
8

Along the same lines, watching Star Wars with my sons. Lol - when I told them I watched it in theaters in 1977, they asked me “so was it ‘LIVE in a galaxy far away’ back then?” Sassy little fuckers!
/r/MensRights09/09/21 08:03 PM
0

Honestly - this is the wrong place to get this advice. For one, you really need to think local - while folks on a Reddit sub could be anywhere in the world. Get off the internet and ask friends and people you know. This info is likely to be word of mouth. Secondly - you are going to hear endless horror stories - which are not wrong, but also not helpful. You need advice on what you CAN do - not confirmation that the family court is unfair
/r/MensRights09/09/21 07:07 PM
4

Lol! It takes forever to evict a nonpaying tenant in NY, I’ve heard. There is nothing legally you can do to protect yourself.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:26 PM
23

Yes - these states are “kitchen sink” states where there is no separate property
/r/MensRights09/09/21 02:49 PM
43

Half of everything accumulated after the marriage (except CT and MI). And to avoid commingling separate property - there are asset protection trusts (preferably outside the jurisdiction, like Nevada). They work well for movable assets but not real estate. Hence, I always cash out refi real estate.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 02:40 PM
40

… while also collecting child support from his father till he turns 18 or 21 (NY, NJ).
/r/MensRights09/09/21 02:26 PM
71

That’s factually untrue. Feminists lying, who knew? Sec. 171.207. LIMITATIONS ON PUBLIC ENFORCEMENT : (j) Notwithstanding any other law, a civil action under this section may not be brought by a person who impregnated the abortion patient through an act of rape, sexual assault, incest, or any other act prohibited by Sections 22.011, 22.021, or 25.02, Penal Code. https://legiscan.com/TX/text/SB8/id/2395961
/r/MensRights09/09/21 01:50 PM
75

Does he own the house clear, or with a mortgage? I’d never keep too much equity in real estate
/r/MensRights09/09/21 01:47 PM
75

I almost think this is satire … but then I see it’s Australia. Just when I think America’s fucked up, Australia be like “hold my beer”
/r/MensRights09/09/21 01:20 PM
4

You need to put your location. If you are anywhere in the United States, though, that’s not going to work. If her name is on the lease, she has just as much right to be there as you. The best you could do is sublet to her on a month to month, though I strongly doubt your landlord would permit that. Even there, you would have to give one month notice of lease termination and the eviction process if she doesn’t leave after the one month notice.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 02:42 AM
2

The law permits a civil lawsuit for $10,000 damages against any person who aids and abets an abortion of a fetus that has a heartbeat. The suit cannot be brought against the mother, herself. Also, a fetus has a heartbeat within six weeks of pregnancy, often before the mother knows they are pregnant. It also allows anyone, including those who have no relationship in the matter. So yeah - while it doesn’t ban abortions, per se, it makes it impossible to have one.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 03:16 PM
16

He’s accused of being transphobic because he opposed bill C16. C16 mandated using transgender inclusive pronouns, under threat of criminal prosecution. He argued that it violated free speech. He never said anything against transsexuals. He even said he’d consider using someone’s preferred pronouns - on a case by case basis. But what he said was that he refused to have the pronouns he used compelled by the government.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 02:41 AM
1

over 40 million women regularly vote against anything that is not traditional family values InTeRnAlIzEd MySogNy
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:20 PM
51

TLDR - fewer men are going into debt to earn a useless degree.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:17 PM
8

Or the life expectancy.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 02:06 PM
1

InTeRnAlIzEd MySoGnY!
/r/MensRights04/09/21 04:58 PM
1

Yet so many American men put their life on the line to fight the brutal Taliban.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:39 PM
2

I also heard about a case in Ontario where a guy who never shared residence with a woman was ordered to pay spousal support. Kindly forgive my ignorance of Canadian geography - but Ontario is in a different province?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:35 PM
0

But remember, what Shkrelli is hate for - buying the only maker of a drug and raising the price 50x - is not what he got convicted of. Sadly, that’s 100% legal. He got convicted of something he did before he became so hated.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:08 PM
1

Of course there is a woman behind every successful man. Because no one stands behind unsuccessful men.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:04 PM
2

Most of the money in the Madoff scheme has been paid back, according to this 80%. https://www.ai-cio.com/news/madoff-victims-recovery-tops-80-losses/ That’s almost unheard of for Ponzi schemes.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:57 PM
1

Yeah - his username is really gonna check after this.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:26 PM
18

“The real issue here is that so many men hate women. After all, if they didn’t, why would so many commit acts of sexual and physical assault against us?” Where the hell does she get that from? Only a tiny proportion of men rape women. As for domestic violence, it almost goes both ways. Anyone espousing her view hates men.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:58 PM
9

They’d probably create some kind of domestic partnership with an extremely broad definition so that if you don’t tie the knot, your in a domestic partnership with anyone you date.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:50 PM
7

That’s terrible. Well I am glad you have full custody of your son. Take good care of him!
/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:13 PM
1

It’s pretty said when you have to qualify “evaluator” with “neutral.” “Neutral evaluator” should be redundant. Glad to hear you still have custody of your son.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 04:24 AM
1

Yikes! Cause I heard they don’t have divorce in Philippines - common law marriage and your in it for life.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 09:16 PM
2

From the get-go - you absolutely need to have a local family law attorney (not your attorney friend that practices in another area) to draft this. For heaven’s sake do not think you can just get all the forms from legalzoom, or some other place. A lot of it depends on the state. As a general concept - they usually are enforced in most states, provided (1) enforcement would be reasonably fair at the time of the divorce, (2) the parties disclose all of their assets, (3) do not include child custod…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 05:46 PM
3

“Never talk to the police” is not always practical. There’s a saying, “You can beat the rap, but you can’t beat the ride.” Lawyering up only works for the rap. Sure, if you’re facing a violent crime rap, take the ride and STFU. But when you’re with kids that are in your care, the last thing you want to do is take a ride. Your weekend is gonna be fucked, and the child is gonna be picked up by some stranger, or worse CPS. OP did the right thing - explain, comply. It sucks, but he did beat the ride
/r/MensRights19/08/21 11:14 PM
2

It’s not by any means solely due to BLM - but NM, CO, and NY ended qualified immunity. The Tri-states (NJ, NY, CT) changed their use of force guidelines to make force the last resort and severely limited the arrestable crimes (as opposed to citations and summons), off the top of my head.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:57 PM
5

Nah - they have to provide counsel to criminal defendants under the 6th amendment. So they hire one or two public defender and bury them with something like 300 cases at one time. Then they also jack up the bail so a lot of folks often get stuck in the hole for months on end. So their in the hole with a PD that might have spent two hours looking at their file. PD tells them, take this plea and go home with time served, or stay in the hole for another few more months for the privilege of betting …
/r/MensRights18/08/21 09:25 PM
5

Not sure how it is in the UK, but in the US, there are too many cases and not enough courtrooms to try them all. If everyone demanded a jury trial, the whole system would shut down. So they make it like take a plea or bet your life.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 05:58 PM
3

“Basically she operates on a day to day level without any medium to long term strategy. Deep down, I don't think she really understands our daughter will be an adult one day. My goals are to provide a stable home, be financially solvent, be responsible and have fun. I suspect the ex wife, will balls up on the finances and max out credit card etc.” Lol … has she considered moving to the United States and running for Congress? I see American politics in her future. ; )
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:20 PM
7

Hopefully, that 50% of the time will just align with the time his ex gets the daughter ; )
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:10 PM
2

I can confirm this. The term “whiplash” is almost exclusively used in America in the context of a personal injury claim/lawsuit after a rear end collision. I’m willing to bet that American doctors probably use a different term precisely to disassociate from the stigma.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:21 PM
1

If you don’t mind my asking - is it still pegged at 20% of your net plus health and dental or was it adjusted because you get more than the standard possession order?
/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:07 PM
1

Just want to say good on you and your ex for handling this in such a sensible manner! Your kids will be so much better because of it
/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:58 PM
1

According to the Texas Bar webpage, she went to Texas Southern University, ranked 191/200 in US News and World Report. https://www.ilrg.com/rankings/law/4/desc/LSATMed
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/21 02:07 AM
1

Are you sure you posted on the right thread? You’re not wrong, but it’s just hard to see what this has to do with how wages affect marriage likelihood. Perhaps this was meant for another thread?
/r/MensRights16/08/21 02:34 PM
2

Hahahaha! You must share some stories - or better yet, videos of someone getting triggered
/r/MensRights16/08/21 02:25 PM
3

Go with the attorney you think is best, but if it’s a very close call between a male and female attorney, I’d go with the female one.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 02:16 PM
1

You are way into hire a lawyer territory. And please - if you seek legal advice elsewhere on Reddit - expect little bits of advice you could probably find on Google, buried in volumes of sanctimonious preaching. If she is collecting food stamps - it may not be entirely initiated by her. In most states, welfare benefits include an assignment of child support to reimburse the state. OTOH, the state would not know about your living with your parents. What she may try to do is impute an income to yo…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 02:04 PM
1

If I was gonna wake up, 50 years from now - I’d probably put mine in real estate in NYC and Tokyo. With that many people and that little land, its gotta up in price, regardless of what currency is used.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 01:13 PM
2

About the Russian rubles, can confirm that it was true. I visited the USSR in 1987. Had to declare how much “hard currency” I was bringing. Exchange for rubles was only permitted directly with the Soviet government. They gave you a crappy rate, about 1 to 1, when you could get 5 to 1 in the black market. They advised me to keep all receipts for everything I bought, because they could require you to fully account for what you did with all your hard currency. If you couldn’t account for everything…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:14 AM
1

This was in 2012. She got 15 years. https://www.dispatch.com/article/20120905/NEWS/309059748
/r/MensRights16/08/21 02:54 AM
2

Damn!
/r/MensRights16/08/21 02:39 AM
8

Thank you! That would make sense.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:31 PM
2

The real problem here is that in divorce, there is no financial penalty for cheating (especially not for women). As for feminist reparations - people will say anything to morally justify their own shitty behavior.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 03:01 PM
22

This Doesn’t add up. 40 hours at minimum wage is a lot more than $50/week.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 02:54 PM
1

Them and the Texas Family Law Foundation, along with Committee Chairwoman Victoria Neave (a divorce lawyer) successfully killed the bill this previous legislative session, even though it had wide support and many co-sponsors. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUQ174oHqec
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:35 AM
3

And once again, the shared parenting bill died in the legislative session, thanks in no small part to Rep. Victoria Neave, who happens to be a divorce lawyer. Here’s a great piece by Wayne Dolcefino about how the whole thing went down: https://youtu.be/iUQ174oHqec
/r/MensRights10/08/21 04:48 PM
1

You had me up until the last sentence. The court reached the right decision because his fifth amendment rights were violated, as the DAs office reneged on a deal. The DAs office felt that they could not get a conviction. To provide some measure of justice to his victim, they stated that they would not press charges so that Cosby could not take the fifth in a civil trial. His victim got a $3M settlement out of it. If the DA can then reneg, and not only reneg, but use testimony that was induced by…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 05:06 AM
2

She has to pay him back approximately $100/month. “It is understood Julie will be required to pay back the child support, but as she no longer works, she will be paying just $49.80 a fortnight.”
/r/MensRights30/07/21 03:59 AM
1

Even at $18M/year, she’s is not even at a 1/1000th of Jeff Bezos’ net worth. Fuck, do I feel poor : (
/r/MensRights30/07/21 03:37 AM
1

He was one of four or five heirs to a $1B fortune. Still wasn’t right, though.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 03:14 AM
14

Now be honest - how many of y’all thought this was about the American State of Georgia?
/r/MensRights23/07/21 08:36 PM
2

Thank you for pointing this out. In edited my comment to point this out to avoid misdirected anger.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 04:48 PM
195

Please cross post this to r/iamatotalpieceofshit Edit - added, the woman in the picture is a reporter and is NOT the lady asking for her ex to sell his kidney.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 08:18 AM
1

First, before you get married, engage in equity stripping. If you own rental real estate, take out loans against your equity. If your business owns the real estate that it uses for operation, sell it and lease it back. If you have equipment, sell it and leased it back. Put the loan/sales proceeds in a trust. The idea is that you control income producing assets, but don’t actually own them. BTW - all lot of this is applicable to protect you from lawsuits. It’s not a bad business strategy, either,…
/r/MensRights23/07/21 06:17 AM
0

I believe marriage is a partnership, and therefore, wealth accumulated during it should be split in half. What I’m against is lifestyle spousal support because no one should have a right to another’s income after said partnership has ended. But in this case, she got one and not the other. What gets me steamed is when the wife (or husband) gets both. Normally, I favor splitting the marital estate over spousal support cause both parties can truly go their separate ways, but they both agreed to spo…
/r/MensRights23/07/21 04:01 AM
2

I had thought that this was in addition to half the marital estate, which must have been at least half a billion. I just read that the support was more or less in lieu of it. That actually is quite fair.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 03:33 AM
4

In that case, this was a clear victory for him. His net worth is $820M, undoubtedly, a large portion of which had to be earned during their marriage. Having to pay $3.5M annually is much better than splitting the estate. He’ll probably buy her out for, I’m guessing about $75M lump sum. That’s less than 10%. If I’m correct, that actually seems fair.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 03:17 AM
11

Q: How many feminists does it take to change a light bulb? A: That’s not funny
/r/MensRights23/07/21 02:38 AM
5

But some of them are true: "5. They Couldn’t Have Their Own Mind" My neighbor who is 80 was telling me about that great day in 1975 when they finally gave her her very own mind! She has no idea how she managed to live 35 years without one.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 12:49 AM
3

Oh come on! We need them for amusement
/r/MensRights23/07/21 12:25 AM
10

BeCaUsE oF tHe cArEeR aNd OpPoRtUnItIeS sHe GaVe Up To SuPpOrT hIm!
/r/MensRights22/07/21 11:59 PM
2

The Japanese hate this 75 year old American negotiation trick…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 08:13 AM
3

I don’t think this is really a men’s rights issue. On the other side, I’m sure there are cases where fathers can’t have their children vaccinated because mom is a Karen. Whichever you think is right - it’s a COVID issue
/r/MensRights29/06/21 06:08 PM
1

It’s an easy ad hominem attack.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 10:08 PM
2

The law of diminishing returns kicks in a lot earlier than the lady on the left thinks it does.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 09:31 PM
3

Read your edits. Your sister is very lucky to have a great brother like you. You are obviously mature beyond your years as is evident in your recognition of the nuances in your relationship with your sister. I guess my advice is to love the bigot, but hate the bigotry.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 04:59 PM
2

She’s a troll. This is not a good data point to extrapolate anything from. She once said that no one in the last 300 years can compare to her. She revels in the fact that she has been called the most hated woman in China. She obviously subscribed to the belief that no publicity is bad publicity. It seems to work as she has 600,000 followers.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 07:47 PM
1

Sleepers
/r/MensRights26/04/21 07:06 PM
1

No - that would be depleting the marital estate and the wife could file suit against the family member for a fraudulent conveyance. On the other hand - mortgaging it, you turn an illiquid hard to divide asset into liquid, which can be divided more easily. Crazy isn’t it? Hypothetically, a $500,000 house owned clear and the judge will give it to the wife - but, a $500,000 house with a $400,000 mortgage on it and $400,000 in investments, and the judge is more likely to give her the house and split…
/r/MensRights11/04/21 06:06 AM
1

It may not help in every case, but you could make sure the house is heavily mortgaged. I might add that there are many other reasons to do so that are not related to divorce.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 10:32 PM
1

TLDR: Women are prostitutes, men are John’s.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 02:16 AM
4

Strange how feminists never talk about concealed carry. I mean - if, as feminists say, all crime is male on female - wouldn’t it make sense for women to conceal carry? It’s cause feminism isn’t about solving problems - it’s about exploiting them.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 08:09 PM
3

But they forgot the profession with the biggest pay gap - divorced spouse.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 12:32 AM
3

How “Family” court rapes men. 85% of custodial parents are mothers 96% receiving alimony are women, though the female is the bread earner in 40% of marriages - I don’t think ANYONE, male or female, should get alimony beyond the cost of a four year public college degree, and that too, only if you had to stay home to care for children. I am an attorney, but my practice is not family law. However, I wind up knowing more than I’d like to because of friends asking for advice. Family court is literall…
/r/MensRights03/04/21 05:11 PM
2

I wouldn’t even call that poor decision making. Between the two contracts, I’d have chosen the one the women chose. But I’d recognize that it paying a little less is the price you pay for guaranteed money.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 07:44 PM
24

But then there were two years where it was more beneficial and they still cried foul!
/r/MensRights02/04/21 04:11 AM
28

In fact it demonstrates the differences between most (but not all) men and women. I think it was Jordan Peterson who said that men tend to engage in riskier behavior. The men took a contract that had no base pay, and paid only from bonuses for the games they played. The women were offered the same deal, but refused, negotiating for almost 50% base pay pay and 50% in bonuses, as well as severance pay, and other benefits.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 04:10 AM
3

No - I mean women account for something like 75% of consumer spending. If there is, it will be one that sells to businesses.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 01:09 PM
2

OP cross-posts from r/childsupport completely misrepresenting OP (of the cross-post) as scheming to game the child support system, gets called out for it and goes off on a needless tirade against Australia, and now this. And yeah, it turns out that the supposed scheme wouldn’t even work in the state in question.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 10:33 PM
3

It’s not gonna work. Texas does not do 50/50 parenting (yet). Texas guidelines are 20% of net, plus medical support (no more than 10% of net). It doesn’t matter how much the “other parent” sees the child.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 12:30 PM
6

Around 4:53, When he was talking about the nightclubs and asked her, when he asked her how many times she got into the VIP section free, when an ugly girl had to pay full price. It would have killed me if he instead said, “when that chubby chick on your right had to pay”
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:55 AM
15

No, it’s even worse. The idea is to write criminal statutes that are so broad so that there is no man, woman, child, dog, or cat that hasn’t committed a crime. That way, when someone pisses of the authorities, you have tons of shit to prosecute them for.
/r/MGTOW230/03/21 02:11 AM
9

I digress, but have you ever read the RICO statute, 18 USC 1961-1968? I mean two college kids get together and download two bit torrent files. That fits the definition of an organization engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity.
/r/MGTOW230/03/21 02:03 AM
30

Or they may use them against people they don’t like - like persons espousing certain antigovernment viewpoints, or political enemies. That’s the scary part.
/r/MGTOW230/03/21 12:45 AM
8

that's exactly what I am saying. It's completely nuts.
/r/MGTOW230/03/21 12:29 AM
10

(6) Threatening to publish information or make reports to the police or the authorities; The statute does not limiting what type of information you can't threaten to publish. So don't tell your wife/GF you're playing Draftkings. You can play Draftkings, just don't tell her about it. I mean the identify of your picks is information that does get posted on the internet. So you are publishing information. And if you tell your wife/GF that you plan on playing, you are "threatening to publish informa…
/r/MGTOW230/03/21 12:27 AM
15

Wow! The bank had my back - who would've thought!
/r/MGTOW229/03/21 11:56 PM
47

Uh - “Controlling how much money is accessible to the individual and how it is spent” - I refinanced my mortgage, and the bank wouldn’t let do a cash out. They also forced me to use the proceeds to pay off my old mortgage. Does that mean I can prosecute them?
/r/MGTOW229/03/21 10:41 PM
11

You know very well - she’s played the nuclear card in your divorce. I’ll assume that you are in the United States. From what I’ve seen, in the beginning you are helpless as judges just give ex parte orders and even TROs based on what’s on paper. But at some point, she does have to back up her claims, and that’s what you get yourself ready for. Do you have your parents, sibling, or other support group. Lean on them. Remember, pay attention to the long game, your daughters depend on it. Good luck!
/r/MensRights29/03/21 04:00 PM
3

Lol! With screenshots of consent, you may be paranoid - but the one thing you are demonstrably not is an incel!
/r/MensRights29/03/21 06:13 AM
1

Thank you for a very well articulated viewpoint. I wish more people could recognize nuance the way you do.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 06:07 AM
25

So then murderers, robbers and rapists, who aren’t bothered about curfew violations - well, because they’re criminals - don’t need to worry about those pesky white knights and simps. Oh, and as for the cops: Dispatch: 911, what’s your emergency? Caller: Help! there’s a terrorist unpacking grenades and an assault rifle from his duffel bag. Send someone quick!!!!!!! Dispatch: calm down. We’ll send an officer tomorrow before noon. Caller: WTF! - he’s about to blow up the place any minute 911: Ma’am…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 05:50 AM
1

What do they think the chances are of it passing in Texas, this session?
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:41 PM
3

Bills like this come up in the Texas Legislature every session and there is always someone who blocks it. This time it’s State Rep. Victoria Neave, a lawyer whose practice includes family law (among other things, tbf). Guess she can’t let that cash cow go, seeing that city of Dallas sued her for $26,000 in property tax arrears.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:30 PM
2

Of course there is. Cause all women abandon men who are less than great
/r/MensRights28/03/21 06:08 AM
1

Thank you. Fixed.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 10:16 PM
8

There was that video where they pepper sprayed a 9 year old girl. The cop that pepper sprayed was a female, but there were around ten of them. There was plenty of outrage at both and it is hard to measure which one got more. In general, i think that the far important issue is policing and speculation about what would happen if the victim were a different gender detracts from it. There are many much better examples of double standards.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 06:20 PM
2

A: No Scotsman dislike fish and chips B: bob is a Scotsman and can’t stand fish and chips A: Really? Wow! Didn’t know that. Bob is truly the exception, and the only one I’ve ever heard of. Let me rephrase - VERY FEW Scotsman dislike fish and chips Edit: struck “true” in the first statement.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 06:05 PM
20

This whole thing is an hour long. It is terrible - at one point, the female officer gets in the face of the kids and grunts at the top of her lungs. Not really sure it’s so much a men’s right issue as much as it is an police/authority issue. The male officer was no better than anyone else.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 04:49 PM
0

Well yeah - but he literally told the police to assault him.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 04:32 PM
0

Coming back to the case at hand, the judge could have granted a discovery order and warrant to search the house and seize the property. I’ve even seen a discovery order permitting opposing counsel to inspect a factory ... in another country. The problem was that the manner that it was done violated all due process So this act is much closer to a judicial function than your murder hypothetical.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 04:16 PM
0

You mean civil suit for wrongful death. Take a look at Mirales v Waco, the judge was held immune from the injuries caused to the public defender while being thrown through a door. The holding suggests that if he had been killed in the process, he would not have a case for wrongful death.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 04:10 PM
0

In case of murder, there would be a criminal prosecution. " No. sorry. It's not quite THAT tight... especially in cases like this where they leave their seat of power." If you have some case law on that, I'd be happy to look at it.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 03:35 PM
2

She had no power to do what she did but judicial immunity still prevents a CIVIL suit against a judge, even for exceeding their powers. When they say “charged” - I believe they are referring to a charge of judicial misconduct - not a crime. Look, I’m not defending her - in fact, I’m saying what I’m saying to demonstrate how outrageous judicial immunity is and why it should be abolished.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 03:23 PM
0

No, they were in the middle of a court hearing. See https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/2020/10/02/family-court-judge-search-video-part-2/ which is from the judicial complaint against the judge to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia "4. During the hearing, Respondent suddenly and without explanation asked Mr. Gibson who was representing himself pro se for his address. Respondent sua sponte stopped the hearing and ordered the parties to meet her at Mr. Gibson's house in ten minutes against…
/r/MensRights26/03/21 03:13 PM
0

They were in the middle of a court hearing and the judge decided to do this. So they were in court.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 04:48 AM
1

See edit!
/r/MensRights25/03/21 11:19 PM
0

That is not a very persuasive argument. I’m NOT saying he is a rapist or not, just that the argument is not a good one. I’m sure even a thief has bought 1000s of things they didn’t steal. Edit: egad! Added “NOT”
/r/MensRights25/03/21 10:12 PM
6

" They aren't immune from illegal acts and abuse of power." Judicial immunity is extremely broad. Judges in the United States are immune from suit for civil damages for any “judicial act” that they perform that's not in the clear absence of all jurisdiction. Stump v. Sparkman. This immunity applies even when the judge acts maliciously, in bad faith, corruptly, or in excess of their jurisdiction. Bradley v. Fisher and Pierson v. Ray. Jurisdiction is clear, because the judge is a NC family court j…
/r/MensRights25/03/21 08:28 PM
4

Sadly, he is going to lose against the judge, but not the sheriff. Judicial immunity is practically absolute. Edited to add: "against the judge, but not the sheriff."
/r/MensRights25/03/21 05:26 PM
4

This is a gem! Woman complaining about the tables turning cause of age. Now she knows how every man under six foot tall, making less than six figures feels. Boo-fucking-hoo!
/r/MensRights25/03/21 04:42 PM
3

And yet - at the end of the article, there is a woman (a doctor) who is stuck with lifetime alimony. I’d love to hear what she thinks about NOW.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 08:17 PM
1

Breaks my heart. I also feel bad for the adoptive parents as well as they surely developed attachment to Skylar and had to give her up, and AFAIK did nothing wrong. The culprit is the mother and the government for allowing this to happen.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:56 PM
2

Defense Attorneys even have a term for it - “testilying”
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:11 PM
1

If you cant video record - audio record. If you are up to it, record, and complain without the recording and see if she denies it. Then send out the recording.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 01:19 AM
77

InTeRnAlIzEd MySoGoNy!
/r/MensRights22/03/21 01:56 AM
1

Do they really think the rapists and muggers that they fear would abide by the curfew?
/r/MensRights19/03/21 01:39 PM
3

The advice is about right. He has no suit against Uber because they can, apart from discrimination against a protected category, activate or deactivate anyone they want for any reason or no reason. He can sue the passengers for defamation. The problem is that he will have to shell out a lot of money in legal fees to get a uncollectible judgment. Nothing more to be said
/r/MensRights18/03/21 10:51 PM
1

May I ask where you are from/reside?
/r/MensRights17/03/21 03:20 PM
1

If you clarified that asset sharing justifies reduction/elimination of alimony, I doubt you would get any argument here. The problem is that in US divorces - the lesser earning spouse gets BOTH asset sharing AND alimony.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 02:52 PM
1

And that is addressed in the property settlement agreement. The wife shares equally in their accumulated wealth during the course of the marriage. Just like when an investor divests, they their proportional share of the assets. However - they do not continue to collect dividends for earnings after divesting.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 02:29 PM
1

It was sorta meant to be tongue in cheek. I wanted to pick someone shitty, and hitler was too over the top.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 08:09 PM
1

“Most people don't have careers, they tend to have jobs. It's unlikely that many people, either men or women would fall into the category you're talking about.” Excellent point! These folks talk like everyone who works is either a CEO or head of state. If I hAdN’t SaCrIfIcEd My CaReEr I’d Be JeFf BeZoS.” Many people work as plumbers, electricians, firemen, carpenters, teachers. Exactly how is working less hours a sacrifice. And even for white collar executives - It’s not a career ladder, it’s a …
/r/MensRights16/03/21 06:35 PM
0

Child support is based on daycare expenses. If she chooses not to work - then no daycare expenses and she can pocket it as compensation. Otherwise she can work and put the children in daycare. Kids don’t need too much time when they are older.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 05:49 PM
0

That’s why there is child support.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 05:28 PM
-1

Karl Marx
/r/MensRights16/03/21 05:02 PM
1

Skip to about 5 minutes - the judge asks a question - to paraphrase - how could CPS possibly not know not to commit perjury. Honestly - this is more about civil rights than men’s rights.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 08:13 PM
1

A 100 Rs/day to attend school - that converts to about US$ 1.33, or a little over £1. Even in India, that’s not a lot of money. Is this really a hill we want die over?
/r/MensRights27/02/21 01:17 PM
25

What is an “unfertilized embryo” ? - forgive my ignorance of biology, but my recollection was that an embryo is fertilized by definition.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 09:57 PM
1

It’s extremely important to be the first to “go public” with this and get his narrative out there.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 05:44 PM
2

It’s called an irrevocable trust.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 07:14 AM
8

I hope the judges that made these rulings get the absolute worst kind of cancer and die a slow, painful, death.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 04:21 AM
3

Next thing you know, they’ll call poker racist because flushes and four of a kinds are anti-diversity
/r/MensRights25/01/21 01:42 AM
1

The title is not true - Target and Kmart in Australia took it off their shelfs. Not the Australian government.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 09:45 PM
1

This title is not accurate. Australia did not ban it - Target and KMart in Australia did.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 09:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter