TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

golemsheppard Archive

View 2 posts and 93 comments by golemsheppard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

So let me get this straight, the game involves you shooting thousands of guys in drug deals, police encounters, and even has a brutal interactive torture sequence on a male victim, but it oppresses women more because you can pick up hookers and implies you have sex with them despite never actually showing it?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 10:33 PM
1

Depends, is she a lawyer?
/r/MensRights08/12/14 08:45 AM
2

Every person is responsible for their own safety. If you don't feel safe walking alone at night, buy pepper spray, take a self defense course, or ideally get extensive training on concealed carry. Forcing one gender to protect the other reinforces the notion that women are weak and incapable of independence.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:31 AM
-1

Good! You can't uphold individual rights without recognizing LGBT rights.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 12:35 PM
30

"Acknowledging that some people lie about rape means people no longer automatically assume a crime occurred exactly as the accuser claimed. And that's rape culture. "
/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:24 PM
2

Notallmen
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:50 AM
6

Don't forget about applying for government jobs and running for public office as well.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:07 PM
133

Someone threatened their victim complex by demonstrating that the feminists were the aggressors in this circumstance. Feminists hold onto their victim complex like a fat kid holds onto cake.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:40 PM
8

I can't stand change.org for this very reason. "I don't like this thing that is going on so the government needs to step in and tell private parties how to conduct themselves. "
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:21 PM
8

I find it very disturbing that they took the murder of four men and two women and make it into a gender specific problem.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:20 PM
5

I agree. This just validates his narcissistic victim complex.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:51 PM
-1

This is probably the 29th thread I've seen on reddit about the politics behind Elliot Rodgers. Can't we just let a loser sociopathic narcissist be a loser sociopathic narcissist? Why is everyone coopting this tragedy for their agenda against white male privilege/gun rights/privacy rights/sexism/feminism/virgin shaming? He was a douchebag who was angry at the world and wanted to be recognized and remembered for him infamy. Dont give him the satisfaction. Just let him fade into obscurity like the …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:50 PM
1

I'm sorry to hear that had been your experience. I've never felt like I was being shouted down on this sub reddit.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:45 PM
4

There is not a uniform stance on the issue. We are a group of roughly 90, 000 individuals who agree on some things and politely disagree on others. Any discussion and debate is welcome so long as it remains respectful. I personally dont know where I stand on the issue. I was raised by Democratic parents so my default position used to be pro choice. Now I think the issue comes down to whether or not you see a fetus as human life. If you don't see it as human life, then it seems like an issue of w…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 01:01 AM
1

Good on them.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 11:31 PM
1

Enroll in the cheaper course,. When they unenroll you, start dropping words like lawyers, litigation, and lawsuit. Basically any word beginning with L that shows you are not fucking around.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 11:30 PM
1

Many people I have spoken with on this issue are convinced that men's rights activist is just a synonym for anti womens rights activist, as in we hate women, dont want them to vote, and want to being the 1950s societal norms back into place. They confuse us with ultra social conservatives. Remember that SNL skit where self avowed feminist Lena Dunham accused MRAs as being bitter, scrawny men's who couldn't get with women? And stated their goals were to make sure women got paid less per hour than…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 11:27 PM
2

Reminds me of this gem. http://politicalhat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/gender-studies-degree.png But seriously people take courses because they teach them marketable skills that will help them get a job. Claiming the system is broken because no one takes your course is raising the white flag and admitting that people think your class is useless and don't feel it will help them in any way in a career.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 11:17 PM
2

"Fuck Democracy" Translation: "We held a fair election and my ideas lost, therfore the system is broken because I didn't win. "
/r/MensRights19/03/14 11:09 PM
1

The content discussed here was good, but I can never take these videos seriously. I can't stand the monotone of a computer program reading from a script.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 11:05 PM
50

Remember kiddos, domestic violence can only happen to women. You see, women don't have any institutional power, so they can only be the victims. /s
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:57 PM
8

Due process does not attach to rape suspects. There have been a number of posts by these groups specifically about why we should always believe the accuser and taking the position that it is impossible to know who is telling the truth without evidence is patriarchal oppression.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:45 PM
29

Its from a tumblr feminist. In their land female rapists are both a myth and logically impossible.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:42 PM
1

Society naturally sees women as victims and men as aggressors. It's why absent evidence to the contrary, society naturally presumes that if two people have drunken sex, then the man must have raped the poor defenseless women.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 04:53 PM
1

This is done fairly often to bring attention to how programs like affirmative action are inherently unfair. John Stossell did it. College Young Republicans clubs do it regularly. Admittedly, it works. It's a form of activism where people walk away realizing discrimination against men is unfair.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:59 PM
2

Saving for later. Also, the 77 cent figure had been debunked for better reasons that career choice. In 2009 the Department of Labor studied the yearly earnings of all full time employed men and women. They defined full time in federal terms of 35 hours a week of work or more. They found that the average woman only made 81.5% as much as the average man, 18.5% less. They also studied how many hours per week the average man and woman works. Men work 42.25 his per week on average. Women work 36.50 h…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:53 PM
4

For anyone too busy to read the article, I will summarize it for you. "Crime is terrible. There used to be a code amongst criminals where only men were victimized. That was perfectly fine. But now they are targeting women as well. This is unacceptable. Women are perfectly equal to men, but men have a responsibility to protect women. Women of course have no such responsibility to protect men or other women. Can't men just go back to being the overwhelming majority of victims in violent crimes so …
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:31 PM
14

As a libertarian, I've held this belief for some time. What consenting adults choose to do is not the business of others and as no one's rights are being infringed upon, should not be criminalized.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 09:27 PM
26

Honestly, after reading his article in the Wall Street Journal, immediately thought "Well that was s refreshing breath of accountability for people decisions" and "feminists are going to crucify him". His article, if anyone had not read it, was not about blaming victims. Rather, he asks the obvious question: If being intoxicated eliminates your capacity to consent to sex, then when both the man and woman are intoxicated, why do we as a society presume that the man raped the woman? Why not presum…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 07:57 AM
140

This is a disturbingly new trend from the feminists and social justice Warriors. It builds upon the notion that women are always the oppressed proletariat, powerless before the male bourgeoisie. It's the whole, "discrimination equals prejudice plus power" mantra utilized to alleviate any personal responsibility for their actions. Because women lack any institutional power in their world view, they can never discriminate. In essence, because they are in their minds the chronic victims, they can l…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:16 PM
57

Its a women studies textbook.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:57 PM
3

"No Fee speech here. "
/r/MensRights07/02/14 09:01 PM
1

So then if a 24 year old guy had sex with a 15 year old girl, she knows what she is doing and that's perfectly fine right?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:48 PM
5

I read the article twice. I dont see any mention of her getting a rifle chambered for 5.56 by 45.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 07:12 AM
1

"Tumblr: Blogging for assholes."
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:25 AM
2

Poor little guy. I bet the last thing he ever said was to respond to a women thanking him with, "It was my privilege."
/r/MensRights22/01/14 09:42 AM
2

This had nothing to do with men's rights or gender issues in general. If you check the post history, that's kind of this users thing: advertising Hollywood costumes in erroneous subreddits.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 09:38 AM
4

I particularly like how their proposed law was vague and had no discernible details so it could be interpreted as whatever they want down the line. "Did that man just smile at me?" "Sir, you are being arrested for not backing the fuck up." "But I am all the way across the room." "You're eyes weren't you fucking smile rapist."
/r/MensRights22/01/14 09:35 AM
2

Yes it is. It demonstrates that she is a liar and unwilling to uphold oaths that she takes. Even if she didn't pull a Clinton and perjure herself under oath, it still demonstrates that she promised to do one thing and chose to do another. Are these the character traits that you want in a last empowered with the executive branch of your state's government?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 03:31 AM
1

Its refreshing to see an emphatic women who cares about gender issues and demonstrates an internal locus of control.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 08:58 AM
3

Don't forget that she is an admitted philanderer.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 08:45 AM
1

Ah, the dreaded white cis heterosexual males.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 08:44 AM
1

We shouldn't lower ourselves to the lowest common behavioral denominator. If my neighbors dog shits on my porch, I am not going to trespass on my neighbors property and then take a deuce on their dog house. Doing the wrong thing (exaggerated criminal charges) just to advocate for how unfair it is that the wrong thing happens to you is never justified.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:34 AM
9

Is clearly assault, but I don't think it's sexual assault. She didn't target his testicles because of their sexual nature, but rather to maximize pain. Following this logic, punching a woman in the boob would be sexual assault.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:33 AM
1

Someone overhears and tells them about it or a webcam was accidentally left on.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:08 AM
1

Lately, I have taken to documenting every code green (restraint) that I respond to. Myself and one of my female colleagues are both tasked with one of us responding to codes during our shift overlap. I responded to the first code and then told her she got the next one. Three or four days later another code occurred on our forensic unit and I told her it was her turn to go. She refused on grounds she was a woman and told me that restraints are a man's job. It's funny because she is moderately fem…
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:07 AM
2

Is true. I work in a psychiatric hospital. Men and women get paid the same amount. Women can get out of having to staff violent patients or respond to restraints on grounds that they are women. Men who point out that this is equal pay for unequal work are told to man up.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 01:45 PM
2

Better question: If both parties are blackout drink, and neither can consent to sex, then in legal teems did sex even happen or did they both rape each other?
/r/MensRights17/01/14 01:39 PM
2

The most disturbing thing about this video is the fact that the male victims are being pummelled in the face but still buying into the myth that women have a special protected status precluding physical force from being used against them in self defense. I dont care which sex chromosomes a person has. If you are are repeatedly hitting me in the face, I am going to knock you the fuck out.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 04:18 PM
1

I do not like this woman's general attitude that they are doing the father a favor by allowing him 8 hours of visitation per week.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 08:01 AM
1

Its true. I do fuck my wife. Guess that means I have integrity.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 05:25 AM
-2

That's only because the Man makes it that way. Here, take my card. "Golem J. Shepard. Investigator of all things Patriarchal or Paranormal. "
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:09 PM
3

I believe in equality for men and women and think that's adequate for self identifying as a feminist. I therefore directly answered a question in r/askfeminists. In my reply, I idenitified my beliefs as such. Their objection came from the assertion that believing equal rights, equal responsibilities, etc between genders is not enough to be a feminist. My view of feminism differed from theirs and I used logic to back my position. My point is that I have come to learn that many of the r/feminism o…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:05 PM
-1

Your Constitutional rights are still a matter of tort law. Simply put, if you can document that they expelled you on the testimony of someone that neither you nor they ever examined or attempted to corroborate their facts, then you just set yourself up for winning a massive lawsuit for punitive damages.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:56 PM
17

Good on you miss! We use to have two women who are great and respond to all the code with us, but one retired and the other took a higher position at another hospital. I really don't mean to make this a men vs woman issue. To me is a people who are going to do their job vs people who want to hide behind their gender and rigid social constructs while demanding the same additional pay.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:45 PM
13

Much of the additional violence against men comes from the fact that patients seldom go from perfectly calm to aggressive. There is a continuum of agitation that tends to occur. Male direct care staff face more violence because we make the conscious decision to send men in to be with escalating violent patients, whets the women teens to stand on the side line. Perhaps some very labile manic patients actually escalate independent of this continuum, but even those tend to get male staff assigned t…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:41 PM
13

That exactly what we are doing. It's a $1.50 per hour differential that gets added to your paycheck independent from your base rate, just like shift differentials or weekend differentials.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:25 PM
44

To be fair, the career opportunities as a professional privilege checker or licensed patriarchy investigator are endless.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:58 AM
85

Infringing on another's rights the highlight that you rights are being trampled is never ok. Blatantly false accusations are never ok, even as a form of activism.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:52 AM
78

"I hereby invoke my Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination and to see evidencevagainst me pursuant to due process, my Sixth Amendment right to cross examine my accuser, and my Fourteenth Amendment guarantee to equal protection before the law (I.e. if gendered roles were reversed, would this meeting even be occurring? )".
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:50 AM
5

I suppose that depends know you define feminism. If you define it as thinking men and women should have the same rights, responsibilities, legal protections, and economic opportunities, then I am 100% a feminist. If you define it as endorsing the belief that men are overtly oppressing women because we are socialized with the provider/protector archetype and work 5.75 hours more per week than women to generate 18.5% more income per year, all so that we can keep women economically disenfranchised,…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:31 AM
24

I got banned from ask feminism because I had the top reply in a thread of theirs where I was politely critical of a economic study being discussed. The reason? Their subreddit requires that the top comment had to be from a pro feminist perspective. I shit you not. They banned me because I was guilty of critical analysis and the majority of readers agreeing with me. It's sad really because feminism has done the world a fair share of good. We now have universal suffrage, equal protections under th…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:58 AM
55

Too bad the guy she lied about raping has sat in prison since 2003. She lies and he loses a decade of his life.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:03 PM
3

I wish I was as articulate as you.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 05:18 AM
1

If you have 300 audience members and 100 of them very loudly boo or applaud, it may very well seem like a consensus. Then when a different 100 people react similarly to the opposite viewpoint, it doesn't necessarily follow that the audience changed their mind. Just that we are interpreting feedback from different groups of people. In fact, the remaining 100 people could very well not even be paying attention. They could be sitting there in silence, introspectively questioning what life's decisio…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:42 PM
3

Could be different parts of the audience applauding.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:32 PM
4

I was happy to see that two out of the three women on the broadcast seemed to support the notion that if you assault a person, they are morally justified in applying force in self-defense, regardless of interactions of gender.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:32 PM
10

"Mansplaining" is the feminist invented notion that men who are not experts in a particular field condescendingly talk down to women who are experts in that field. The term that they were actually thinking of is "being as asshole", but by interjecting "man-" in there it makes it look like being a condescending asshole is a gendered phenomenon.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:15 PM
3

She assaulted him but then turned her back and walked away. You can not claim self-defense when the person is walking away from you and ceasing to be a threat. Yes, she was clearly belligerent. However, he threw a revenge punch, not a self defense punch. He will likely get charged with assault. Hopefully she is as well.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:01 AM
17

Dude, I cant take your graphic seriously. Its made in MS Paint and you misspelled fetus.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 02:04 PM
2

Following this logic, any non-paraplegic person could be a potential assailant who is just plotting to punch you at any moment.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 10:14 AM
5

Agreed. Admittedly I have never done online dating, but if I ever were to, I would insist upon a public place. You are opening a mystery bag of a stranger there. Contents may include crazy.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 10:13 AM
6

I saw the exact same thing and stopped reading because that whole position is bullshit. Working in a psychiatric hospital, I can tell you that our adolescent unit has behavioral disorders in boys and girls. Both genders have trauma histories. I have noticed as well that we tend to see the women as being fragile victims, even when acting out. More likely to give them a second chance for behavioral infractions. Make excuses like, "She's had a tough life." But boys in the same circumstance, not a s…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 07:44 AM
4

The Men's Rights Movement attracts a few loud mouthed misogynists who yell from the periphery, just like the Feminist movement has its fair share of misandrists. Inevitably we all come across the user who upon stumbling into a well documented and articulate discussion of Selective Service Act, responds with "Yeah, fuck cunts." Any group that wants to be taken seriously needs to be able to police its own fringe. I am glad to say that we do that fairly well.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 08:35 PM
1

Are we sure that this in a sincere thing? How do we know this is not just satire like when John Stossel set up an affirmative action bake sale and charged whites less than blacks or asians? Maybe this is being done to get people thinking about the unequal nature of modern day feminism.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:17 PM
3

More birth control options is always better than fewer birth control options. If the concern is men having fewer reproductive rights in the event of an unplanned pregnancy, this makes that scenario less likely to occur. Two thumbs up.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 09:53 AM
2

I wasn't aware that anyone forced people to run around tweeting #YOLO while getting drunk on tequila and waking up with a stranger in their butt. I was in college once too. Much like many of the students at my university, I also went out and partied. And when I did stupid shit, I never tried to blame the man. I just thought, "Wow, that was some dumb shit I did last night. I should probably grow up a bit."
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:46 PM
1

Looks like another feminist "I want equality but dont want to give up my nice privileges" post.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:41 AM
1

Because, you know, the AV club have historically always been rolling in the pussy.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 12:03 PM
0

Sweet, because being the son of two teachers I worked hard and graduated college to attain a respectable profession and because I exercise regularly and dont inhale french fries, I am off the charts for privilege!
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:41 AM
2

I just watched The Other Guys with my friend Gemma at work the other night. She was quite explicit as to what she wanted to do to him.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:08 AM
1

I dont see it that way. Parents have the responsibility to provide for their child once it is born. If you look at broken interpersonal relationships, socioeconomic poverty, health issues of the mother, or an undertone of disdain for the child if they stem from abuse, and decide not to let that fetus develop into a child and be born, thats your freedom to de so. In a nutshellmy podition on parenting is that you dont have to do it if you are not able to meet the needs of the child, but if you are…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:13 PM
5

Im a 25 yo male and if I met Katy Perry I would spend a minimum of 40% of the time staring at her tits. Theres no double standard here, if my female heterosexual friends met Mark Wahlberg they would spend just as much time staring at his pecs and biceps. Lets all admit tgat as people we express certain aspects of human sexuality.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:16 PM
3

Three words: Male. Birth. Control.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:08 PM
9

Having a baby is a natural consequence of coitus. Having to provide for your child is an inherent responsibility of both parents. While I share your wish that men had more control over their reproductive choices post ejaculation, it is most certainly not rape. Either you are trigger happy on the hyperboles or have a fundamental misunderstanding of rape. MRAs have serious issues to address. Statements like this make us look like misogynistic clowns piling into a VW Beatle.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:05 PM
1

Sorry, I was pretty drained after being up 32 hours when I wrote this. Not the best literary work.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:24 PM
1

It further the victim mentality by depicting women as being helpless and in need of men to step in and assist them.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:23 AM
1

This ad campaign perpetuates the notion that women need men to protect them. Women are equal, but deserve a special protected status requiring strangers to intervene to assist them.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:21 AM
8

You are a man. Therefore, you dont get to have any original views of these types of issues. You options are only to remain silent or agree with the belligerent.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:17 AM
6

I am confused. Your position is that reclassifying rape to include vaginal, anal, or oral contact against ones will would disadvantageously affect men whom are victims of sexual assault by women? I dont see how there is a specific definition that precludes prosecution of a women for forcefully making contact with a man with her vagina, anus, or mouth, or even his anus or mouth. Would anyone care to elaborate their position here?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 09:42 PM
68

I hate when 98% of men are male.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:36 AM
1

Yes, she was being a fucking buffoon. But he was far from just politely waiting on the side. He was intentionally antagonizing her. Did she unnecessarily escalate the situation and commit a felony? Absofuckinglutely. That being said, this is far from a post for misandry. He was not "maced for no reason". He was maced by an asshole for being a milder asshole.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:00 PM
1

They were both being assholes. I just so happens that one was a larger asshole and committed a felony.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter