TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

goodfoobar Archive

View 22 posts and 1,245 comments by goodfoobar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
83

Generalgoodfoobar/r/MensRights24/12/21 01:38 PM
66

Feminismgoodfoobar/r/MensRights29/10/16 01:51 PM
51

Social Issuesgoodfoobar/r/MensRights19/03/16 01:58 PM
49

Social Issuesgoodfoobar/r/MensRights21/12/17 02:48 PM
44

Social Issuesgoodfoobar/r/MensRights03/02/18 04:40 PM
33

Generalgoodfoobar/r/MensRights25/12/22 01:51 PM
33

Social Issuesgoodfoobar/r/MensRights23/12/19 12:06 AM
26

Legal Rightsgoodfoobar/r/MensRights19/03/21 05:34 PM
24

Intactivismgoodfoobar/r/MensRights07/12/19 02:30 PM
20

Fathers/Custodygoodfoobar/r/MensRights20/10/15 08:25 PM
20

Intactivismgoodfoobar/r/MensRights22/06/17 12:58 PM
14

Generalgoodfoobar/r/MensRights25/12/20 02:18 AM
13

Intactivismgoodfoobar/r/MensRights13/01/18 02:35 PM
12

Social Issuesgoodfoobar/r/MensRights18/12/18 06:08 PM
12

Social Issuesgoodfoobar/r/MensRights24/12/16 04:27 AM
8

Social Issuesgoodfoobar/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:37 PM
6

Discriminationgoodfoobar/r/MensRights15/08/16 01:01 PM
6

Legal Rightsgoodfoobar/r/MensRights22/04/18 10:47 PM
6

Social Issuesgoodfoobar/r/MensRights29/05/19 01:39 PM
6

goodfoobar/r/MensRights04/05/14 07:13 PM
4

Storygoodfoobar/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:12 PM
3

Social Issuesgoodfoobar/r/MensRights24/12/15 03:35 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,245 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Whoever is running the Trump show puts out one face to the public and does contradictory things behind the scenes. It is common practice in politics.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 02:21 PM
4

The African circumcision-HIV studies were shown to be fraudulent so there is no evidence on that continent either.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 02:17 PM
1

Rejection Experiment: Guys Vs Girls https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmP1ier3R30
/r/MensRights24/12/24 02:16 AM
1

as he will grow to be insecure One of the few studies done on infant circumcision showed that it caused extreme trauma and the the child's lymphatic system which was permanently changed. This change would lower his pain threshold and make him a more nervous person in general. The Blood Stained Men group has gathered a lot of information on the topic in the form of science and personal stories. https://www.bloodstainedmen.com/
/r/MensRights11/11/23 03:55 PM
3

So your saying that you did everything the medical industry told you to do and you got sicker. Hmmm
/r/MensRights20/10/23 07:38 PM
9

I was in a similar situation about 10 years ago. Employees that were there before me had stories of massive layoffs of Canadian technology workers. While there much of the work was contracted out to people in India. Even worse the majority of the people around me were Indians in Canada on temporary work visas that we called "offshore workers". After loosing that job I asked one of the Indians do you need an "offshore worker" and his reply was that India does not do that kind of thing. Many Canad…
/r/MensRights14/10/23 07:19 PM
25

I've been putting out applications in Canada in the technology sector for many months now. There are common application questions that are called 'Optional'. Are you a Native North American? Are you disabled? What is your gender? There are typically about 5 options. Are you a veteran? Are you part of a recognized minority? Recognized minority is defined as anybody regardless of where you were born other than white. The question might as well be 'Are you white?'
/r/MensRights14/10/23 03:55 PM
3

Apparently the truce spontaneously happened in many places along the front line. It didn't happen the next year because there had been a year of hard feelings and death built up between the two sides.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:54 AM
2

The Sabaton tribute song is new to me. Thanks
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:49 AM
8

Honest Ribbon exists to counter the more unjustifiable claims that are made by white ribbon groups. It is run by Erin Pizzey. https://honest-ribbon.org/
/r/MensRights25/11/22 11:52 PM
4

LOL "Cycle through many accounts to make themselves look like a larger group" is a perfect description of what paid shills do. There is money in keeping the practice going. The majority of people against circumcision don't say much and have probably never even heard of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 01:16 AM
7

The word circumcision is seen by many as an attempt to make male genital mutilation sound benign.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 10:25 PM
2

https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Main_Page
/r/MensRights23/10/22 02:13 PM
1

The 1,000 per square inch is an average over the entire body. An arm or a leg is many times less sensitive than fingertips, lips, and foreskin. Wikipedia mentions that a better reference is needed. After looking at the reference I agree it is very light on details. Looks like there have been Meissner's corpuscle studies done on fingertips. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2224947/ Here is one done on male prepuce. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450466/ Not sure how to …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:52 PM
1

A very rough calculation then. Assume 3.5 sq in tissue removed during circumcision. 1 sq inch of skin has 50 million surface bacteria. So 175 million surface bacteria. Assume nerve endings and surface bacteria are about the same size. Assume 0.5% of tissue is actually nerve endings. 0.875 million nerve endings. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:49 PM
1

Thousands suggest an even smaller number. Are you trying to rehash the number even smaller? Inaccurate information is a foolish thing to spread.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 01:19 PM
1

Foreskin will release on it's own as the child matures. This can happen in puberty and 2-5 year olds are too young as there foreskins are likely still naturally attached to the glans.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 01:16 AM
1

Have noticed over time that the number of nerve ending sighted keeps dropping. I recall hearing 22,000 which became 20,000 and now your saying 10,000. The actual number is likely closer to the hundreds of thousands or more. There is likely some kind of standard cell density calculation that can be done.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 01:13 AM
6

The article doesn't tell us if the biological father even knows the child exists.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 02:30 PM
7

This is just an electronic form of something that has been around for a long time. I recall hearing about a battle in the woman's toilets over a list of men's names to avoid. There were women that would erase the lists and those that would put them back up. This did not happen in the men's toilets.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 02:23 PM
1

It is clear to me that neither of us support circumcision. Any study that correlates circumcision and HPV occurrence is suspect in my opinion. The same way that HIV-circumcision studies have been proven suspect. I'm sure you have read science reports supporting circumcision and can show how they are questionable. Your using vaccine science to support your argument. I've simply shown you in this case the vaccine science can be shown to be questionable.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 01:34 AM
1

The link you provided seams to rely on African studies which have been proven unreliable in HIV-circumcision studies. It suggests that circumcision reduces transmission but does not say how. How does circumcision work to reduce HPV transmission? Seams like your trying to eliminate the possibility that it is zero. Either way the graphs in the study show little to no change in trends after introduction of the vaccination program. If you read through part 4 Discussion it mentions studies in other c…
/r/MensRights06/06/22 12:20 AM
1

Circumcision is only effective in reducing transmission. Interesting assertion, my understanding is that transmission can occur during any significant skin to skin contact. For most people nothing happens, for others it is minor and clears up on it's own. It is only the unfortunate few where it becomes a problem. Vaccines give immunity to _% of recipients The study I posted suggests that it could be 0%.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 10:35 PM
1

What makes you think there is any more honesty surrounding the vaccination industry then there is surrounding the circumcision industry?
/r/MensRights05/06/22 09:17 PM
1

On the HPV reference here is a study from 2013. In Australia over the last decade there has been a decline in the incidence of low-grade squamous dysplasia across all age groups, particularly noticeable in women aged 20 to 24 years. This change predated introduction of the national vaccination program. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jo/2016/3056407/
/r/MensRights05/06/22 08:06 PM
1

Have not shared these posts in some time. They were my attempt to address the sensation question. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/e7exil/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights05/06/22 07:51 PM
10

Hygiene So it might take a second longer. Do you think it is difficult? UTI It is not clear this is actually the case. Either way women are more likely to get UTI's, it is an insignificant issue for them because it is an easy thing to cure. STI risk There are studies that suggest greater risk and studies that suggest lower risk. The risk is not settled science. In the case of HIV there were African studies claiming lower risk that were found to be so flawed as to be fraudulent. Penile Problems A…
/r/MensRights05/06/22 12:43 AM
1

A man who's life is ruined due to sexual assault accusation would likely have that as a higher priority. A man who is separated from his children would likely have family courts as a higher priority. A teacher in education may put the promotion of male methods of learning as a higher priority. A man in India where circumcision does not happen would likely put dowry laws as a higher priority. There are so many significant men's rights issues and some of them are regionally specific.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 01:09 PM
1

It depends on the amount of tissue removed. The underlying erectile tissue remains the same volume. Imagine a bag holding more then it is designed to hold and being stretched to it's limits.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:08 AM
0

Each individual person has their own priority list. I would say that many men's rights supporters would put circumcision as a high priority, but not all.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 03:26 AM
1

It they got this so obviously wrong what other false hoods are they promoting?
/r/MensRights24/04/22 09:19 PM
1

It is a mistake to assume that behavior is all environmental or all biological driven. This Norwegian documentary series shows what happened when it was assumed to be all environmental. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4gd9td/the_documentary_that_made_norwegians_cut_all/ Part 1 of 7 https://vimeo.com/19707588
/r/MensRights05/04/22 03:36 PM
5

Men constantly express there emotions, it is basic human nature to do so. Male and female methods of processing emotions is different. There is overlap. Female methods tend to be easier to spot such as talking or crying. Male methods tend to be harder to spot and often involve doing something. Doing something is often seen as avoiding emotions instead the processing that it is.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 01:25 PM
12

Based on passive surveillance reporting in the US A great many adverse events are not captured by passive reporting systems. There is a professional medical culture out there of blaming anything but vaccines for adverse events. The passive reporting systems are often difficult to use and many medical professionals don't bother using them even when they know the cause. I think the real world gender difference is real and reflected in the passive reporting system data even if the total case count …
/r/MensRights27/03/22 02:38 AM
16

Male and female methods of processing emotions is different. There is overlap. Female methods tend to be easier to spot such as talking or crying. Male methods tend to be harder to spot and often involve doing something. Doing something is often seen as avoiding emotions instead the processing that it is.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 02:16 AM
2

Men constantly express there emotions, it is basic human nature to do so. It is just that female forms of processing emotions are more visible than male forms. While women tend towards talking or crying men tend toward doing something which is often viewed as avoidance when in reality it is directly dealing with emotions.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 05:00 PM
10

Family court should also be more equal, and needs to throw away the patriarchal belief that women are automatically better with children This is a feminist belief. Before the "tender years doctrine" championed by feminist organizations children went to the parent in the best financial situation which was usually the male. The doctrine changed that to be the female regardless of the financial position of each parent.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 04:54 PM
1

When quota hiring exists people can be left wondering if the person really deserves the job. Quotas don't necessarily include gender requirements.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 07:57 PM
4

This kind of thing happens when people are given positions based on quotas. People assume you didn't get there based on merit or competency. Quotas are institutional discrimination based on anything but proven competency.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 11:48 PM
11

It is worth arguing if there are neutral observers watching judging the merits of each side.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 11:37 PM
19

The Justice for Men and Boys (and the women who love them) political party is focused on institutional discrimination's.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 06:10 PM
87

This is specifically a Great Britain list but it applies to many countries. It explores 20 areas where the human rights of men and boys are assaulted by the state’s actions and inactions, almost always to privilege women and girls. https://j4mb.org.uk/2015-general-election-manifesto/
/r/MensRights06/02/22 05:20 PM
2

I posted the video comment and got separate civil debate and respect replies. Look again.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 10:49 PM
-6

The reply was to the video, not to the civil debate comment.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 10:42 PM
-12

So your saying the comment was meant for the OP and is not related to the Thomas Sowell video that was replied to.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 10:31 PM
-30

How does this comment relate to the video?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 07:28 PM
5

A partial list of harms meatal stenosis, erectile dysfunction, hairy penis, buried penis, pleasure sensation loss, spray during urination, loss of ejaculation control...
/r/MensRights19/01/22 03:36 PM
214

Earning gap data from the 1970's. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUpgoayBPJc
/r/MensRights19/01/22 02:38 PM
2

I agree, that is why I posted it. Don't really understand why it was removed or shadow banned from men's rights subreddit as it is a basic "Men are Good" message.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 06:44 PM
2

Thank you for the response MekTam. It looks like this post has been removed.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 10:14 PM
25

This does not bother me so much. The fight scenes or duels between male and female characters is boring to watch due to predictability. While the male may get a hit or two in the female character always comes out the victor. Sometimes I think they could put a 90lb female against the Hulk and the Hulk would not stand a chance according to Marvel Cinematic Universe rules.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 03:32 PM
8

Voting rights. For much of history nobody had them. They were initially based on property ownership. The transition to citizens right to vote happened for both genders at about the same and often in a single piece of legislation.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:04 PM
5

Historically there were two legal status for women. Fem Sole and Fem Covert. Under Fem Sole women were legally in the same situation as men. A woman became Fem Covert after marriage. Legal actions and debts responsibilities fell to the husband under Fen Covert. Read about a case where a wealthy woman kept control of her land through a prenup and when she stopped paying property taxes the poor husband went to debtors prison.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 03:14 PM
2

Feminism is supported by the "elite" to generate the myth of patriarchy and divert attention away from them.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 03:15 PM
5

indicating that adult circumcision adversely affects sexual function in many men, possibly because of complications of the surgery and a loss of nerve endings. Don't think "possibly" is the right word to use here.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 02:22 PM
2

MGM can result in erectile dysfunction. Due to lack of nerve ending feedback there is a greatly diminished orgasm and loss of control over ejaculation. Assistance is often needed from things like sex lube. These are sexual dysfunctions. FGM can result in women relying on internal nerve endings which remain untouched by all forms of FGM. Type IV FGM also leaves the external nerve endings intact.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 03:57 PM
5

operation for free at government or community-sponsored clinics Says a lot about what these organizations think about public health. was delayed, first by a volcanic eruption and then the coronavirus pandemic. Hope that many boys that will never be circumcised due to the delays. It's the only positive I can see in this.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 02:44 PM
1

It is in part due to the spending gap. The average woman purchases more then the average man. Shows want ratings to get advertisers. Advertisers want female viewers because they purchase more. Shows cater to females to get advertisers that want female purchasers.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 03:23 AM
5

Each US state had it's own set of rules. The gender restriction existed federally but was not common in individual states.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 05:49 PM
1

Have heard one theory as to why voting rights came into existence in the first place. Power used to be passed down to the eldest child or son. This lead to a lot of second, third, ... children that were perfectly capable being left out and marginalized. These children decided to create a new world order where power was passed down to any child. The problem was how would it be decided which child would get the power. If it was left up to them there would be a never ending internal fight. It was d…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 04:24 PM
14

That the current usage of the words man and men mean male was considered a default or more important gender. Some evolution of the English language. Wilfman, Wilfmen Today we use the words woman and women. Werman, Wermen. Used to refer to adult males. There is no equivalent in the English language today. When referring to adult males we use the gender neutral words man and men. These are gender neutral statements. "All men are created equal" "To boldly go where no man has gone before." Girl: Was…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 01:29 PM
20

Voting rights. For much of history nobody had them. They were based on property ownership. The transition to citizens right to vote happened for both genders at about the same and often in a single piece of legislation.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 12:50 PM
6

Phimosis cannot be properly diagnosed until late puberty as the foreskin is not suppose to release from the glans(head) until puberty. It affects less then 1% of adult males. Steroid creams can solve the problem 87% of the time. For those times where the cream does not work a small cut can be done on the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal required. Watch until 16:32 https://youtu.be/8TmWmN5ZWFw?t=750 "If I can do it at age 72 you can do it, no matter what your age." http://www…
/r/MensRights23/07/21 05:04 PM
1

I'm not the OP and have not cited any web site. I am fairly positive that such studies have been done This line is a claim that you have not supported. Why should I not just dismiss it as a biased load of bullocks?
/r/MensRights19/07/21 03:58 AM
1

What does China and religion have to do with anything? I am fairly positive that such studies have been done This means that you don't know if such studies have been done. Are you being lazy and not doing the work?
/r/MensRights19/07/21 02:55 AM
2

The majority of journalists that I see on TV and news papers are female. Watched a foreign correspondence conference many years ago. These people would cover war zones or other generally dangerous parts of the world. There was one or two male foreign correspondences there. It was even brought up as a discussion topic as to why there were so few males in the foreign specialization.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 11:56 PM
2

Have seen the story about the MRI being used to monitor circumcision effects before. It would not be difficult for a formal study to be done. To my knowledge anyone that has tried to do the study has been reprimanded by ethics boards and had there data destroyed. So the science journals think it is ethical to circumcise infants but unethical to find out the effects of those changes.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 12:15 PM
1

Testosterone plays important roles in the biochemical functioning of the body. If it is low then the body is less functional. The OP's linked article would suggest reduced brain function as one effect. Recall an interview with someone being treated for low testosterone. He described having lost a interest in life. A bowl of plain porridge was as interesting as a full extravagant meal.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 02:12 AM
2

To answer this one must first determine the cause of the problem. I have not seen any clear answers on the cause. There is probably more than one cause.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 02:12 AM
5

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=testosterone+levels+over+history https://www.healio.com/news/endocrinology/20120325/generational-decline-in-testosterone-levels-observed https://bigthink.com/sex-relationships/men-have-less-testosterone-today?rebelltitem=1#rebelltitem1 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=estrogen+endocrine+disruptors
/r/MensRights13/07/21 02:33 PM
12

Both genders have what are considered male and female hormones. It is the average amount of the hormone present in each gender that determines whether it is considered to be a male or female hormone. Apparently testosterone has been falling about 1% a year for at least 20 years. The average 40 year old has 20% less then the average 40 year old from 20 years ago. Endocrine disrupting molecules mimic estrogen and are found everywhere in our industralized environment today.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 02:06 PM
1

People should be aware of the risks that come with vaccination. There are two after market passive data collection systems that have world recognition documenting these risks. Passive data collecting systems rely on people voluntary submitting reports so they collect a small percentage of the total number of events out there. The UK yellow card system. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions The US VAERS system filtered by COVID19 vaccine and Ser…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 12:51 PM
0

What do you think of the American medical companies claiming to provide COVID solutions for the entire world?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 04:50 PM
6

The data surrounding COVID have been falsified so much that any numbers put out has questionable trustworthyness.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:51 PM
4

The organization is also known as Canadian Association for Equality (CAFE) which is where the OP said they got a lawyer. It has a good reputation even among many gender biased politicians. Think this is because they are firm in there equality between genders policies and initiatives.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 12:44 PM
12

This organization should be able to guide you to resources if they don't have them themselves. https://equalitycanada.com/contact/
/r/MensRights08/06/21 12:32 PM
1

There are elderly men circumcised as infants that have been able to do foreskin restoration. Foreskin restoration at it's most basic level is skin stretching. If these men can do it and a 17 year old can't then the 17 year old has a lot more skin issues then a tight foreskin. Watch until 16:32 https://youtu.be/8TmWmN5ZWFw?t=750 "If I can do it at age 72 you can do it, no matter what your age." http://www.norm.org/
/r/MensRights22/05/21 12:33 PM
4

Using circumcision to treat phimosis is like using a sledge hammer to put in a finishing nail. Phimosis cannot be properly diagnosed until late puberty as the foreskin is not suppose to release from the glans(head) until puberty. It affects less then 1% of adult males. Steroid creams can solve the problem 87% of the time. For those times where the cream does not work a small cut can be done on the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal required.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 04:43 PM
0

Clarification. "Serious Adverse Events" are not defined in Merck's HPV vaccine insert. They are defined by the US FDA as death, life-threatening, hospitalization, disability or permanent damage, congenital abnormality/birth defect, or the requirement to intervene to prevent permanent impairment. https://www.fda.gov/safety/reporting-serious-problems-fda/what-serious-adverse-event
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:14 PM
0

A simple search will show that there is a more complete list of serious events then are mentioned in the vaccine insert. Out of "pyrexia, allergy to vaccine, asthmatic crisis, and headache" the only one that might not be "life threatening" is headache. I have seen people that get migraines, they are unable to do much of anything for days at a time regardless of what pain killers are used. The following search is for "HPV vaccines" and "Life Threatening". https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.p…
/r/MensRights18/05/21 03:24 PM
0

People should know the risks before considering this kind of treatment. Merck clinical trials show Percentage Serious Adverse Events after Gardasil vaccine is 2.5%. 2.3-2.5% doesn’t sound that bad until you compare apples to apples. Cervical cancer rates are always quoted as # per 100,000. Given the above information, for every 100,000 people using Gardasil 9 there would be 2,300 serious adverse events. The cervical cancer diagnosis rate in the United States is 7.9/100,000. You can verify the nu…
/r/MensRights18/05/21 01:32 PM
2

It could be said that we are living in an age of aluminum. People that have studied the toxic effects of Aluminum have found that it goes past the blood brain barrier and it reacts more strongly in the presence of testosterone and less in the presence of estrogen. Both genders have testosterone and estrogen but the balance is different in the genders. There are silica compounds that can remove toxic Aluminum from the body. They can be found in some foods or there are refined silica compounds tha…
/r/MensRights11/05/21 12:45 PM
1

People should know the risks before considering this kind of treatment. Merck clinical trials show Percentage Serious Adverse Events after Gardasil vaccine is 2.5%. 2.3-2.5% doesn’t sound that bad until you compare apples to apples. Cervical cancer rates are always quoted as # per 100,000. Given the above information, for every 100,000 people using Gardasil 9 there would be 2,300 serious adverse events. The cervical cancer diagnosis rate in the United States is 7.9/100,000. You can verify the nu…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 08:52 PM
5

I'm scared of being bashed or hated It takes time to get over this fear. People often get emotional when encountering something that does not fit their world view. They often defend their world view by lashing out with words. Some people are just trolls trying to get you to be emotional. Some people are paid trolls with a mandate to only allow a certain point of view. It does not really matter which category the insult thrower is in as it comes down to you and how you handle things.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 02:06 PM
1

We can guess by what various religions claim today as religious beliefs tend to be passed down through generations. To my knowledge Muslim is the only religion that commonly claims hygiene as a reason to circumcise.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 01:18 PM
2

The degree of invasivness is a judgment call but I would call Type 4 FGM which is common less invasive then even the least invasive type of MGM. Type 4 which is a skin scraping or pin prick does not even leave physical evidence that it happened. It only exists to fulfill cultural ritualistic practices.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 07:49 PM
1

Every region that performs FGM also performs MGM. The type of MGM performed by each region is typically more invasive then the type of FGM performed. There are many countries that only preform MGM. As for sanitary conditions each region uses whatever is available to them and there is no gender distinction there.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 06:59 PM
4

There's none so blind as those who will not see.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 05:24 PM
4

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6nJIVSYwqdA/UTK2EmHTzSI/AAAAAAAAA48/I2pqFwklStY/s1600/Sorrells-Chart.jpg
/r/MensRights27/04/21 02:49 PM
35

Using circumcision to treat phimosis is like using a sledge hammer to put in a finishing nail. Phimosis cannot be properly diagnosed until late puberty as the foreskin is not suppose to release from the glans(head) until puberty. It affects less then 1% of adult males. Steroid creams can solve the problem 87% of the time. For those times where the cream does not work a small cut can be done on the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal required.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 02:47 PM
8

Scratches and cuts can heal without scars. Scars are inevitable after surgically removing tissue of any kind.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 02:38 PM
7

t is difficult for men circumcised as infants to understand. Hopefully the following can give you some insight. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings(Meissner's corpuscles). These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in blac…
/r/MensRights27/04/21 02:13 PM
8

The clitoris is a very large organ that is mostly beneath the skin. It is simply too large to entirely remove. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJZ_XyPe4cc Doctor Repairs FGM and Supports Genital Integrity for ALL Children
/r/MensRights26/04/21 03:08 PM
7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaEoQVZnN8I The Consequences can be worse for Boy than for Girl https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXaqyXGTbCc Marilyn Milos - Children, Genital Autonomy and Human Rights
/r/MensRights26/04/21 02:46 PM
1

Your just guessing about the way smegma was viewed historically. Today it is viewed as a positive clean thing when women produce it and a dirty thing by pro-circumcision people when men produce it. Biologically smegma is good.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 08:02 PM
1

"toxic parenting" How would this lead to physical neurological differences peoples brains?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 02:14 AM
1

Autism rates have increased dramatically over the last say 50 years. Claiming it is just diagnosed better now does not hold because severe Autism is obvious and severe cases simply didn't happen in noticeable numbers historically. If the increased Autism rate could be explained with genetics then something is damaging peoples genetics. If something is damaging genetics then it is also likely that something is damaging people in development.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 02:11 AM
5

The very use of the word Neurotypicals suggests that there is something different in the brain of autistic people. This can but does not necessarily mean reduced intelligence. It can mean a reduced ability to handle full sensory input leading to being more easily overloaded. Intense focus is a method of handling sensory overload. Focus is a very useful skill for things like STEM. Edit: How is it that the neurological difference happens?
/r/MensRights17/04/21 03:36 PM
3

My understanding is that Autism is mainly caused by brain damage either before birth or shortly after while in early development. The two most common ways this can happen are physical damage or chemical damage. Would guess that physical damage happens to both genders at about the same rate. Have seen evidence that Aluminum compounds that get into the blood stream are more destructive in the presence of testosterone. Consumption of Aluminum while not good is mostly handled by the digestive system…
/r/MensRights17/04/21 01:24 PM
4

The returnofkings web site is not respected of by many who are long term participants in this community. Congratulation for figuring this out on your own.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 03:34 PM
1

Each region uses the medical tools available to them. If that means there are no professionals around then that is what is used regardless of gender. Are you trying to maximize female circumcision and minimize male circumcision? Yes, non-consensual circumcision is immoral and brutal way to treat anyone.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:28 PM
1

The most extreme and damaging methods are not common around the world for either gender. The most extreme for men is a partial sex change operation. These men cannot have sex and need special equipment to handle urination. Think it is done among Australian Aborigines, not sure on that though. Every country that performs female circumcision performs male circumcision and the type is usually more invasive for the male. There are many countries that only perform male circumcision. As you say a simp…
/r/MensRights09/04/21 07:58 PM
3

That WHO page is only talking about the most extreme and rare forms of female circumcision. Sure that can cause problems. Cutting up anyone's genitals can cause problems regardless of gender. That page does not mention the common Type 4 female circumcision which is a ritualistic pin prick or skin scraping that leaves no physical evidence that anything happened. Good video comparing the various types. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98f3IavuEgQ The WHO is still trying to tie circumcision to HIV t…
/r/MensRights09/04/21 06:36 PM
6

Your trying to compare the most extreme and rare form of female circumcision (infribulation) to the most common form of male circumcision. One of the more common forms of female circumcision involves a ceremonial pin prick or skin scraping leaving no physical evidence that anything happened. It is called type 4. Even the most mild form of male circumcision removes some tissue.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 02:27 PM
3

Womens circumcision causes almost always pain for lifetime and makes sex painful for many or even most women. Where did you get this from? Have not seen reports from African circumcised women claiming chronic pain. Many of them seam to defend the practice. We see the same in American men defending there circumcision.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 02:22 PM
1

I object to misleading information and lies which there is a lot of going around. We need to share truth and call out misleading information if we are going to get through this. If you believe that "it's about as safe to take the vaccine as not to" then why take it at all? Has someone convinced you that if your vaccinated that you can't test positive?
/r/MensRights08/04/21 03:13 AM
1

The AstraZeneca adverse reaction report lists 421 deaths out of the 99,817 cases where something went wrong enough to report. A lot more than blood disorders happened. Major categories include cardiac disorders, ear disorders, endocrine disorders, eye disorders, gastrointestinal disorders and that is not even a full list of the major categories. The AstraZeneca report does not include the "Pfizer" and "Unspecified Brands" report numbers. If you assume the very low reporting rate in the US VAERS …
/r/MensRights08/04/21 02:36 AM
7

The circumcision HIV African studies were debunked years ago. They tested adult males for HIV, randomly circumcised half of them then tested for HIV 1 year later. The circumcised men could not have sex for 6-8 weeks while they healed and had access to condoms and general medical hygiene information. The risk was found to drop from something like 2.5% to 1.2% which was called a 60% improvement. There were many other flaws in the studies which could account for the 1.3% difference. http://www.sale…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:55 PM
6

Here is what the UK Yellow Card system has to say about the AstraZeneca vaccine adverse reactions. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/975786/COVID-19_AstraZeneca_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions The similar system in the US (VAERS) is generally recognized as being very under reported. Some claim that it only captures 1% of the vaccine adverse events. Th…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 01:38 PM
14

Knew there must be more then fashion and porn. Surprised how many of these jobs where women make more are skilled labour jobs.
/r/MensRights03/04/21 03:27 PM
5

Motivation is simple for those that want the best for people. The difficult thing is overcoming the massive misinformation campaign that tries to convince people that men don't have issues.
/r/MensRights03/04/21 02:48 PM
2

Not a scientific study but but think these discussion threads are helpful. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/e7exil/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights01/04/21 03:46 PM
1

Lots of information put together by this group. https://www.bloodstainedmen.com/ https://www.bloodstainedmen.com/about-circumcision/resources/
/r/MensRights19/03/21 05:39 PM
1

There must be some detoxification methods out there.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 09:11 PM
1

Men express emotions just as much as women do. They just don't do it the same way that women do. While women seam to have a tendency to talk and cry, men have a tendency to do something. It could be to build something, tear something down, write, bake, draw, physical activity, ... These are often viewed as avoiding emotion because it is not being done in the most recognized feminine methods.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 06:51 PM
2

During the early 1900's there was a legal dilemma that popped up. Women were killing there husbands, crying on the witness stands, and being acquitted every time. Women were literally getting away with murder. Women's tears contain pheromones hormones that affect men quite strongly. Men that questioned these women on the stand were being viewed as bullies. There was an attempt to address this by putting more women on juries and getting female prosecutors to do the questioning. Women are not affe…
/r/MensRights27/02/21 04:14 PM
3

You should take the time to learn Coverture law. This wife beating acceptability myth has been around for too long. If you choose to believe it what do you think about a wife abusing her husband? Do you think a husband would be believed if he said anything? There is no pendulum just a difference between legal freedoms and legal responsibilities. Historically differences were mostly due to biological differences between the genders. For over a century now there has been a push to put maximal free…
/r/MensRights26/02/21 09:43 PM
15

People who were of "low" birth had little say in things regardless of gender. Each gender had there expected roles. The male side was to provide all the resources needed to support a woman and any family members. The husband was liable for all family debt incurred by a wife or children. He was even held partly or fully responsible if one of those family members committed a crime. Both genders had good and bad going for them and making it look like men had it good and women had it bad is very mis…
/r/MensRights26/02/21 04:20 PM
1

A lot of posters will likely think this is because of feminist influence. I think this is because of the spending gap. Television shows to be successful have to get advertisers. Advertisers care about people that make purchases. The majority of purchases are made by women. This means most shows are competing to appeal to the female ego and most can afford to put down the male ego. This comes up in advertisements as well. Whenever an advertisement has a competition between a male and female the f…
/r/MensRights01/02/21 04:46 PM
6

Doctors might take a complaint from someone that is less likely to complain more seriously. It is generally recognized the men are less likely to seek out medical help then women. On the other hand the amount of money that goes into female specific issues like breast cancer versus prostate cancer is very much in favour of women.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 10:35 PM
1

It looks like Reddit is shadow banning some comments on this post. Correction it looks like they are shadow banning posts that contain some links. Your going to have to copy and paste to see these and remove the space before the com. www.nbcsandiego. com/news/local/vaccination-super-station-near-petco-park-abruptly-closes/2495604/ twitter. com/CryptoBull2020/status/1349475183933984768 www.bitchute. com/video/MGhequG21IPG/ medicalkidnap. com/2021/01/24/53-dead-in-gibraltar-in-10-days-after-experi…
/r/MensRights27/01/21 03:46 PM
6

A more difficult question to answer is "Why would intactivism be excluded from Men's Rights?". The only reason I can think of to exclude it on a individual level is trauma avoidance. Dealing with trauma is a good reason to include it on a general level.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 04:29 PM
2

But the question haunted every heart that lived that wondrous night whose family have I fixed within my sights Each Christmas comes since World War I have learned its lesson well for the one who calls the shots won't be among the dead and lame and on each end of the rifle we're the same.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 02:25 AM
6

It is difficult for men circumcised as infants to understand. Hopefully the following can give you some insight. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings(Meissner's corpuscles). These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in bla…
/r/MensRights01/12/20 03:13 PM
11

It is difficult for men circumcised as infants to understand. Hopefully the following can give you some insight. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings(Meissner's corpuscles). These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in bla…
/r/MensRights26/11/20 04:17 PM
2

Several years ago another group I think in BC Canada tried to make a similar list of anonymous accusations. There was a campaign asking for people to submit any story. Some stories were very comedic. The list was shut down due it it being so obviously useless as it became nothing more then a joke.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 02:33 PM
14

Voting rights used to be tied to property ownership. One property, one vote. Some areas had other restrictions such as literacy, race, gender, age, ability to pay. Men got the citizen's right to vote through recognition of there sacrifice in war times. Some women demanded the right to vote and got it 0 - 3 years after the men in regions where gender voting restrictions actually existed. Many women fought against voting rights because they thought it would come with responsibilities such as the m…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 03:50 PM
9

demonizing everything Muslim Being against circumcision is not about oppressing any religious group, it is a stop doing unnecessary physical damage thing, especially to infants.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:09 AM
18

Every region that perform FGM also performs MGM. Each region uses similar medical environments for both genders. There are many countries such as the US that only perform MGM. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaEoQVZnN8I
/r/MensRights10/11/20 03:19 PM
23

It is difficult for men circumcised as infants to understand. Hopefully the following can give you some insight. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings(Meissner's corpuscles). These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in bla…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 02:45 PM
15

As a male teenager in north america even if both my hands were carrying something and opening a door was difficult I would feel guilty if a woman who was carrying nothing held a door for me. Looking back I was the one that was brainwashed.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 05:16 PM
5

It is not about more sensitivity, it is about the type of sensitivity. That is the reason for the comparison between the palm and back of your hand. My guess is that most people that are passionate about this topic have lost "skin in the game". LOL Many of them are trying to process there own emotions surrounding the situation and doing something like activism is an effective male method for emotional processing. Talking about something in a online anonymous forum can be a lot easier then in per…
/r/MensRights27/10/20 03:33 PM
4

You must still have the majority of your foreskin. It is quite common for the entire foreskin to be removed. Many men have so little tissue pubic hair skin is pulled on to the penis or even more extreme cases not enough skin to allow for erections meaning they happen partially inside the body. You are in a far better situation then most circumcised men.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 02:57 PM
7

It is difficult for men circumcised as infants to understand. Hopefully the following can give you some insight. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings(Meissner's corpuscles). These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in bla…
/r/MensRights27/10/20 02:38 PM
5

It is difficult for men circumcised as infants to understand. Hopefully the following can give you some insight. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings(Meissner's corpuscles). These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in bla…
/r/MensRights27/10/20 02:29 PM
6

I would say that the number of people that are aware and think about the situation is growing so the number of upset people must be growing as well.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 02:23 PM
5

Men do cry when processing emotions but it is has limited effectiveness. The same with talking, it has limited effectiveness. Men process emotion much better through action. This could be writing, sports, building something, demolishing something, ... Men are human and process emotions constantly, it is just the most effective male methods are less obvious then the most effective female methods. This leads to the belief that men are not processing emotions which leads to the "toxic masculinity" …
/r/MensRights27/10/20 02:07 PM
2

forcing parents to lead evidence showing that the other parent is less fit Having to provide evidence to support an accusation is one of the most basic principles of law. If they are not currently doing this then it is questionable on whether or not it is a just system.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 09:19 PM
1

I think back to all of the old stories about single room school houses in some remote farm country. The school teachers in theses stories were almost always female. "Ann of Green Gables" "Little House on the Prairie" "Back to the future Parts 2 & 3" are three example I can think of without looking for examples.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 04:00 PM
7

That is very toxic stuff. Whatever the reason she is lashing out it is still an attack on you. Learn facts about what she is claiming so you know what is being said is wrong. This is more for you then it is for her as knowing truth because you discovered it for yourself will keep you strong.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 03:18 PM
2

It is US election time.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 01:01 PM
2

If crying works for you then great. Not all men use crying, many use some kind of action to address whatever is bothering them. It looks like you have something that has been bothering you for a while. It does not appear to be easy to identify what it is but it is there. I hope you can identify it so periodic emotional release sessions are no longer needed.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 03:09 PM
1

There seams to be a tendency for academic paper publishers to put an undue weight on social factors or completely ignore innate factors. This is a general public disservice.
/r/MensRights06/10/20 02:14 AM
1

Have some things to say about these points. 1 call on male students more 2-talk to them more 3-use their names more 4- encourage and allow them to speak more (boys speak 5x as much in classrooms) ... better for girls in the long run, possibly because they are less "coddled" by teachers There have been many posts here stating that teachers are more likely to give girls higher marks then boys for the same work. This suggests that teachers are "coddling" girls not boys. 2 mothers use less complex e…
/r/MensRights05/10/20 08:59 PM
4

Feminism =/= Women The claim they are the same thing is disinformation that causes confusion.
/r/MensRights04/10/20 04:24 PM
1

There are many prominent very experienced psychologists involved in men's rights that would strongly disagree with you. I've given you the starting point.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 02:33 AM
1

I have over simplified. Men and women process emotions differently. Female methods are commonly used by psychologists. Male methods are rarely used by psychologists. The http://menaregood.com/wordpress/ web site is written by a psychologist that has many years experience dealing with males. It covers things much better then I ever could.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 01:13 AM
2

There have been many discussion threads on this forum about males crying. The APA and psychology industry in general seams to think that the only legitimate way to process emotions is to talk and cry. These have never been effective male ways to process emotions. The http://menaregood.com/wordpress/ web site covers this much better then I ever could.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 12:26 AM
2

That link is talking about the origin of "boys will be boys" in regards to children. I agree with the origin part but it then misleads by stating It’s also, unfortunately, used to explain away things like sexual assault allegations This addition of sexual assault line is a lie that was put in place by some cultural programmers. The link also brings up the "boys don't cry" line. Once males go through puberty they are less likely to cry due to physical tear duct structures and hormonal differences…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 11:17 PM
2

"boys will be boys" "girls will be girls" These are acknowledgements that boys and girls behave play and socialize differently. Some programmer out there decided to convince people that it was talking about sexual relations. They lied. Slut shaming is what women do to each other. Rape accusations are common against men with power. Often it becomes statistically impossible for all of the claims to be true. Ever wonder why the same thing does not happen to men without power? 51 years in jail. Inte…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 07:07 PM
2

By legal definition more women are raped because rape was defined as penile penetration of the vagina. Apparently the definition was change to just penetration to allow for the possibility of males to be legally raped but it still excluded female perpetrators. Forced envelopment which is how a female would typically rape a male is classified as a minor offense. Here are some common phrases. "girl power" "you go girl" "girls can do anything" "women are oppressed" "men are oppressive" "Hold the do…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 04:17 PM
3

Yes that is what the programming teaches. I don't expect you to question the programming out of one post but hopefully it is a start. Women are just a likely to commit forced envelopment as men are to commit forced penetration. One is considered a minor offense while the other is considered to be a major crime. Fully expect you to reject this information as well but it is the truth.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:43 PM
2

Television programming typically does not reflect the reality of gender relations. The programming put out by these programs twists the reality and because people believe the false narrative they behave in ways that are harmful. For example you state that the overall majority of sexual assault victims are women. That is what programming tell us all the time. There are posts here regularly showing where women are automatically assumed to be innocent of sexual assault. Common headlines are "male r…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:14 PM
4

So I now say something defensive and then you state something extreme and out of context again. Is that the kind of game you are trying to play? LOL
/r/MensRights02/10/20 12:29 AM
5

Why bring up religion? OP said nothing about religion. Looks like your trying to find something to defend circumcision.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 02:09 PM
2

It is difficult for men circumcised as infants to understand. Hopefully the following can give you some insight. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings(Meissner's corpuscles). These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in bla…
/r/MensRights01/10/20 01:05 PM
3

The clitoris is actually a very large organ that is mostly internal. Even the most invasive forms of female circumcision only deal with surface tissue. There is a group in the US somewhere that performs female circumcision reversal and it mostly involves removing surface scar tissue to allow the sensitive internal clitoral tissue to come to the surface.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 12:53 PM
3

It is interesting that one of the rare times when the courts strongly sides with the father is when he wants vaccination. Goes to show how incredibly powerful the medical lobby is.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 12:49 PM
2

She demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.” But, she added, “the need for affirmative action and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed services.” https://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/senators-overlooked-radical-record-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/ This is the result. "How women took over the military-industrial complex."
/r/MensRights19/09/20 05:18 PM
2

Teen age years when going through puberty is a hormonal storm of confusion. That is true for both genders. Your male teacher may be recalling his puberty but is likely ignorant of the roller coaster ride that girls go through as well.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 01:28 PM
0

Ruth Bader Ginsburg promoted a lot of gender related things that were not good for either gender. https://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/senators-overlooked-radical-record-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/ Here is a partial list of what she did from the link above. The page numbers refer to her book titled "Sex Bias in the U.S. Code". Ginsburg called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design…
/r/MensRights19/09/20 12:55 PM
3

envelopment 1: the act of enclosing something inside something else [syn: enclosure, enclosing, envelopment, inclosure] Forced Envelopment: the involuntarily imposed act of enclosing a penis inside a vagina
/r/MensRights18/09/20 03:40 PM
3

I stopped listening at about 9 minutes in.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 02:25 PM
3

7:04 If were going to define rape as forcible penetration of another human body f****** go find me the 10, 11, 12 year old girls that have done that s***. Girls commit forced envelopment which is considered a minor crime and not serious like rape. It has become difficult to find current numbers but apparently rape and forced envelopment happen at about the same rate.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 02:12 PM
5

Put up a poster beside it stating "Women are just as capable of violence as men." Under sign it with "gender equity" or something similar.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 01:36 PM
6

“possible criminal actions whilst undertaking circumcision procedures and not with the practice of circumcision itself” So what was he charged with? charged with offences including assault causing actual bodily harm, parenterally administering, other than to self, a prescription-only medicine when not an appropriate practitioner, and assault, ill-treat, neglect, or abandon a child or young person to cause unnecessary suffering or injury Reminds me of the Shakespeare play "Merchant of Venice" whe…
/r/MensRights18/09/20 01:30 PM
3

The "tradition" changed over time and there has been push back before. My understanding is that when Jews themselves began attempting restoration by stretch the foreskin the Rabbis started cutting off more foreskin. Today one of the more invasive forms which removes the whole foreskin is common and it is performed on Jews and non-Jews alike.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 12:59 AM
17

Many horrible things have been done in the name of religion. This is just another one.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 12:18 PM
1

Female villains exist. The rule seams to be that the only females can defeat female villains.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 02:35 PM
3

This might surprise you but the claim of racism against blacks is not as bad as claimed. If it were the BLM group would be a constant thing instead for something that only happens before US elections. The racism against white people in the US does exist. For example art made by white people are excluded from art galleries and anyone that defends white artists are squeezed out of the system. https://www.sfgate.com/news/editorspicks/article/SFMOMA-curator-resigns-white-artists-cancel-museum-154076…
/r/MensRights11/09/20 02:30 PM
1

Sorry to ruin this for everyone but from what I have seen the following seams to hold true in TV land. Every time there is a fight scene between a male and a female which is suppose to create tension the male might get some small wins but the female will always win in the end. The exception is when the female is a villain and has to loose to keep the story moving then another female will appear at the end of the fight to defeat the female villain.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 01:40 PM
2

Can only guess at the motivation but here is what happened with the African HIV-circumcision studies. They tested adult males for HIV, randomly circumcised half of them then tested for HIV 1 year later. The circumcised men could not have sex for 6-8 weeks while they healed and had access to condoms and general medical hygiene information. The risk was found to drop from something like 2.5% to 1.2% which was called a 60% improvement. There were many other flaws in the studies which could account …
/r/MensRights11/09/20 01:30 PM
3

I agree with your analysis. Many official political and governmental organizations out there pretend that nuance does not exist. They claim all types done to males are harmless and all types done to females are extremely harmful. It is one of the more subtle parts of disinformation that many are fighting against.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 03:45 PM
4

It was started as a way of removing the mutilation yet still allowing the cultural ritual to be performed. It is generally defined as type IV. https://www.who.int/sexual-and-reproductive-health/types-of-female-genital-mutilation
/r/MensRights28/08/20 01:30 PM
4

Your describing infibulation which is the most severe and rare form of female circumcision. A pin prick or skin scraping that leaves no physical evidence that anything happened is much more common. There is a severe and rare form of male circumcision that is approaching a sex change operation. It is impossible for these men to have sex and usually need equipment to assist with urination. Unfortunately I can't find a link right now.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 12:10 PM
5

At the time it was believe that men had a limited amount of semen and that running out led to dementia and other diseases. There have been lots of excuses made to try and justify torture.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 11:57 AM
4

So does that make the National Association Organization for Women (NOW) a feminist organization or not? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ihs4sg/equality_now_claimed_that_the_foreskin_was_not/
/r/MensRights28/08/20 12:40 AM
11

So removing the clitoral hood (aka prepuce) causes lots of damage but removing the larger foreskin (aka prepuce) is harmless and in no way comparable. I think there is a comparison there somewhere.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 12:05 AM
9

If anyone knows how to move forward with this it is CAFE. https://equalitycanada.com/
/r/MensRights27/08/20 11:58 PM
5

I'm not interested in playing the victim game and I don't think you are either. I was interested in knowing myself better. I researched the pro and con side. The pro side is full of evasion, half truths, and out right lies. The con side states factual information some of which I could verify for myself. The choice on which side was generally more trustworthy was simple.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 08:12 PM
3

I'm not trying to convince anyone here because that would be pointless as most everyone here disagrees with circumcision. I'm merely trying to help those that have been through the procedure to better understand what happened to them. I know from experience it is a difficult thing to look into.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 04:37 PM
6

Are you assuming that I'm "intact"?
/r/MensRights24/08/20 04:16 PM
3

It is difficult for men that were cut as infants to understand what is missing. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly black…
/r/MensRights24/08/20 03:37 PM
2

Have heard there is a brain weight to body weight ratio that indicates intelligence. That is why some birds are recognized as very intelligent compared to much larger animals with larger brains but a smaller ratio. It is probably only one out of many unknown factors.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 04:18 PM
2

I feel if I were to share my opinion I would be shot down because my opinion “isn’t valid” and “you are just saying that to discriminate against women” Learn facts that you can back up. That way you can be confident about what you are saying. Being shot down can be countered with The Socratic Method. It is a method that questions the person shooting you down and allows them to reveal the reason for there statements. When they can back up there words you learn and when they can't you reveal there…
/r/MensRights18/08/20 12:08 PM
1

That article is the definition of fake news. It claims "benefits outweigh risks" which is false. They claim there is growing evidence it protects against HIV while the reality is there is lots of evidence the protective claims came from fake studies. The National Post is usually a respectable news source but in this case they are fake news.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 01:27 PM
3

Men constantly express emotions, it can't be stopped as it is inherently human or even mammalian. Males don't process emotions the same way as females. Female methods tend to be much more obvious. When we see a male expressing emotions in more obvious ways it is instinctively recognized as either very significant or if it is regularly obvious as something being off.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 05:06 PM
11

There are many reasons that relationships breakdown. A poor sex life which circumcision contributes to is one of them.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 01:07 PM
11

There seams to be a lot of casual feminists coming around lately which is a good thing. A casual feminist is one that does not know what the feminists with financial and political power are really doing and have accepted many half-truths and lies as real. even things out after a few millennia of women being seen only as property. This is false history. Women were never viewed as property. Under Coverture laws the genders were treated differently in ways that were not ideal for either gender. It …
/r/MensRights29/07/20 03:58 PM
4

The toxic masculinity line seams to often be followed by beliefs that gender behaviour is a cultural construct when it is actually a biological reality. Examples "men teach boys not to cry". The reality is a physical difference in tear ducts and hormonal differences make it harder for men to cry. "boys are told not to express emotion and be stoic". The reality is men are processing emotions just as much as women. Men often do not process it in obvious ways such as the female method of talking an…
/r/MensRights26/07/20 10:41 PM
1

I've given you all the leads needed to figure this out for yourself. It is now up to you.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 11:30 PM
2

Now you know the red pill that you have yet to swallow. Here is a hint to get you started. Men cry less then women due to physical tear duct differences and hormonal differences. Men do process emotion just as much as women they just don't use tears or talking to do it.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 11:01 PM
2

Toxic Masculinity is the father who tells his son to "man up" or that "boys don't cry". Toxic Masculinity is that men cannot show emotions. This is feminist non-sense. If you believe that this is a valid statement it means you need to unlearn what you have learned. The Men Are Good site has done a very good job of countering this rhetoric. Perhaps learning why the Gillette Toxic Masculinity advertisement had such a big back lash would be good as well. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gillette+toxic+mas…
/r/MensRights25/07/20 04:08 PM
2

Well you have seen the introductory material. The next step which is more difficult is seeing through the misinformation that you have been fed. That is the real red pill which by definition is very difficult to accept. Think that this would be a good place for you. https://menaregood.com/wordpress/
/r/MensRights25/07/20 01:05 PM
5

Not sure if it was you that said yesterday that "what you know about Men's rights came from a Feminist perspective". If it was not you then it is probably still the case for you. Men's rights grew out of a very different perspective. I have linked some resources that should show how the Men's right perspective formed. ManWomanMyth did an excellent series many years ago now. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjMscr0TpRqhGadn27XAzBcwXchJ2EvYp Karen Straughan made many good videos starting wit…
/r/MensRights24/07/20 01:56 PM
2

There might be a list of legal victories somewhere. Most victories are small and go unnoticed. For example your independent investigation into what was said about MRS's and what MRA's actually did is a small victory. There is no way to know how many similar victories are out there that will never be know. require stores to have diaper (aka nappy) changing stations in the men's rooms and not just in the women's This one from a MRA and casual feminist perspective is a victory. The feminists with p…
/r/MensRights24/07/20 01:24 PM
6

https://foreskinfunction.org/
/r/MensRights24/07/20 01:07 PM
6

Adorable, that is the perfect word to describe casual feminists that are unaware of what feminists with financial and political power are actually doing.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 02:48 PM
15

Offended LOL no I'm not offended. It is just another example of feminism showing it's true self. Just realize you have gone through a lot of rationalization to try and justify the term as not being anti-male.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 01:59 PM
11

There's no reason feminism and MRA can't co-exist in the same space, and even work together. LOL Try bringing this up in a feminist subreddit and you will find out why.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 01:41 PM
14

If it is two sides of the same coin then why has feminism called it "something negative masculinity" and not "something negative femininity"?
/r/MensRights23/07/20 01:38 PM
25

idea of masculinity femininity in their heads, that men women can't be assaulted perpetrators I think this belief in females are always innocent is stronger then the belief that males can't be assaulted.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 01:15 PM
12

This subreddit is not anti-woman. In raising men's issues it can become anit-feminist. Feminism =/= Women
/r/MensRights23/07/20 01:07 PM
30

This is the perfect example of why MGTOW is something that is happening as a reaction to current culture. It is not some kind of organized movement as some might suggest.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 12:54 PM
1

way that we perform gender is something that has been curated throughout thousands of years of humanity, Humans are a sexual dimorphic species and that has developed over a lot longer time than thousands of years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism#Mammals "Don't be such a pussy," or "Man up," or "Have some balls" Here are some common phrases. "Hold the door for the woman" "girl power" "a gentleman always pays" "women are strong and don't need anything from anyone" "girls have it so…
/r/MensRights22/07/20 03:18 AM
2

breaking of traditional gender stereotypes ... Showing emotion is “traditionally” considered a feminine trait associated with women, while stoicism is “traditionally” considered more masculine. Getting the impression you think that gender behaviours are a social construct. They are a biological reality starting with hormone differences in the womb. For example infant boys are attracted to movement while infant girls are attracted to faces. normalizing “masculine” behaviors for women and “feminin…
/r/MensRights21/07/20 11:37 PM
0

An Indian woman speaking on gender relations in India. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSRTZ_q4RX8
/r/MensRights21/07/20 02:39 PM
22

There are feminists that have financial or political power to make changes and those that don't. The ones without power typically support those with power. Those without power are often unaware of what those with power are actually doing. This subreddit raises men's issues specifically. The process of raising awareness of men's issues often raises awareness of what the feminists with power are actually doing. Actions speak louder than words if your aware of the actions. This has lead to interest…
/r/MensRights21/07/20 03:56 AM
8

Circumcision has been linked with higher Alexithymia scores. Alexithymia which is the inability to process emotions. It is possibly due to the intense pain of infant circumcision. There is some evidence that the pain changes the limbic system – especially the parts of the brain associated with reasoning, perception and emotions. http://intactnews.org/node/131/1316710012/study-links-circumcision-personality-trait-disorder It is difficult for men that were cut as infants to understand what is miss…
/r/MensRights20/07/20 01:28 PM
3

If there is a benefit STD wise it is negligibly small. The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's. Specifically HIV African circumcision studies are commonly mentioned. These HIV-Circumcision studies have been proven faulty. They tested adult males for HIV, randomly circumcised half of them then tested for HIV 1 year later. The circumcised men could not have sex for 6-8 weeks while they healed and had a…
/r/MensRights20/07/20 01:18 PM
4

Garrels (curator) reportedly stated that no longer collecting white artists would be a form of "reverse discrimination," Discriminating based on skin colour is the definition of racism. Garrels could have just called it racism. Nothing reverse about it. group of former employees started a petition demanding Garrels resign or be removed ... petitioners alleging that the terms "reverse discrimination" and "reverse racism" are "white supremacist and racist language." Looks to me like racism against…
/r/MensRights17/07/20 12:46 PM
1

One of the great things this subreddit does is provide a place for men to open up. Opening up to someone in person can be intimidating for many people. The /r/MensRants subreddit does this as well.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 11:53 AM
0

The HPV vaccine is being pushed on to children which don't get prostate cancer. Vaccines wear off and by the time a boy or young adult might become old enough to be at risk any potential protection from a vaccine will be long gone. The vaccine risks will still exist for those that choose this path. The team found 22 per cent of prostate cancerous tissue contained traces of HPV, compared with only 7 per cent of benign prostates. This is evidence of a correlation, not a causal link. This could jus…
/r/MensRights14/07/20 01:23 PM
1

Never saw the ad This means you have not been looking into men's rights for very long. It was a big issue during the first quarter of 2019. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gillette+toxic+masculinity+advertisement In what way were men reliant on women? Unmarried women had the same rights as unmarried men. Married men became responsible for their wife's debts and behaviours. Read about one case under Coverture law where a rich woman married a poor man. A prenup meant the woman kept control over her land…
/r/MensRights08/07/20 06:35 PM
1

This looks like the standard feminist "male behaviour is naturally toxic and hurts other men too" rhetoric. Willing to guess you saw nothing wrong with the Gillette toxic masculinity advertisement. for a very long time women were completely reliant on men Men and women used to be reliant on each other. Then government came along and gave support to women only which created a gender in balance. when people tell boys to stop trying to impress girls Like the "Don't be that guy" and the "me too" fem…
/r/MensRights08/07/20 01:50 PM
16

The feminists came and shamed men for their wrong doings in the past, The feminists rewrote much of history, portrayed males as the villain in this fabricated history, then blamed today's males for the existence of this fictional history.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 02:29 AM
2

It is difficult for men circumcised as infants to understand. Hopefully the following can give you some insight. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings(Meissner's corpuscles). These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in bla…
/r/MensRights05/07/20 12:52 AM
2

It is difficult for men circumcised as infants to understand. Hopefully the following can give you some insight. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings(Meissner's corpuscles). These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in bla…
/r/MensRights01/07/20 09:18 PM
10

Thank you for the update. Your mother is clearly using her voice to make her opinion known. Just know that you can still use your voice to make your opinion known.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 05:40 PM
5

Woman who said "no one has the white man's back anymore" fired from facebook within hours of Project Veritas video being released. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHzz9aWO8HA
/r/MensRights26/06/20 02:47 PM
4

You have a choice. Do you want to avoid the short term pain for yourself by staying silent? This could lead to long term pain knowing that you could have said something and didn't. It sounds like you don't have the power to stop the circumcision but you can use your voice to make your opinion known. If you want to know more there are lots of resources. /r/Intactivists/ https://www.bloodstainedmen.com/
/r/MensRights18/06/20 08:33 PM
3

It is likely that those circumcised as infants are affected even though their mind is not aware. The body recalls trauma even if the mind does not. Once your mind becomes aware you have the chance for the body to at least partially heal from the trauma usually through emotion. Circumcised men have higher Alexithymia scores. Alexithymia is the inability to process emotions. http://intactnews.org/node/131/1316710012/study-links-circumcision-personality-trait-disorder
/r/MensRights17/06/20 08:48 PM
2

So some of your opinion was formed by information you found on the internet. There are a lot of people assume that because information came from the internet it must be wrong or misleading. For these people logical facts don't seam to matter. Never mind that her opinion was formed by an online article as her web site was a reliable source. Guessing that your mother is avoiding the topic and wants you to avoid it as well. You don't have to discuss this with her but there is no reason you cannot c…
/r/MensRights17/06/20 03:43 AM
2

Thank you for describing your before and after experience. Phimosis cannot be properly diagnosed until late puberty as the foreskin is not suppose to release from the glans(head) until puberty. It affects less then 1% of adult males. Steroid creams can solve the problem 87% of the time. For those times where the cream does not work a small cut can be done on the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal required.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 03:59 PM
4

This usually happens because an adult forcefully retracted the foreskin on an infant to "clean". At birth foreskin is attached to the glans(head) in a similar way finger nails are attached to fingers and is naturally well protected and clean. The foreskin releases on it's own during puberty. Over washing can cause problems due to normal pH and bacteria being put severely out of ballance.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 03:49 PM
1

I thought that wifman changed to woman and wereman got dropped from the language. Now we default to the gender neutral term man when referring to adult males. Wereman referring to males becoming woman referring to females does not make sense to me. They are different words referring to different things. edit: A little confusion I now see. You mixed up the words. Wereman referred to males and wifman referred to females.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 05:51 PM
2

Looks like your describing Phimosis. It cannot be properly diagnosed until late puberty. It affects less then 1% of adult males. Steroid creams can solve the problem 87% of the time. For those times where the cream does not work a small cut can be done on the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal required.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 08:45 PM
3

An archive of his great work. https://archive.org/details/ManWomanMyth
/r/MensRights07/04/20 10:47 PM
3

The African HIV-Circumcision studies have been proven faulty many times. They tested adult males for HIV, randomly circumcised half of them then tested for HIV 1 year later. The circumcised men could not have sex for 6-8 weeks while they healed and had access to condoms and general medical hygiene information. The risk was found to drop from something like 2.5% to 1.2% which was called a massive improvement. There were many other flaws in the studies which could account for the 1.3% difference.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 02:10 PM
7

An archive of his great work. https://archive.org/details/ManWomanMyth
/r/MensRights09/03/20 03:02 PM
4

The sensation topic is one that I have covered here before. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings(Meissner's corpuscles). These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly bl…
/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:40 PM
1

Wilfman / Wilfmen : Old words today we use woman and women. Wereman / Weremen: Old words today we use the gender neutral words man and men. The following are gender neutral statements. A fact most English speakers have forgotten. "All men are created equal." "To boldly go where no man has gone before." Girl: Old meaning was a gender neutral term for a child. Today it refers to female children and sometimes adult females as some kind of compliment. Boy: Old meaning for a servant or slave. Today i…
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:58 PM
5

Tearing? Circumcision removes tissue which increases skin tension. Circumcised men have a greater chance of tearing then intact men do due to greater skin tension.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 11:30 PM
9

Phimosis cannot be properly diagnosed until mid to late puberty. It affects less then 1% of adult males. Steroid creams can solve the problem 87% of the time. For those times where the cream does not work a small cut can be done on the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal required.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 04:53 PM
15

It is difficult for men that were cut as infants to understand what is missing. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings(Meissner's corpuscles). These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel n…
/r/MensRights07/03/20 01:44 PM
2

Looks like your describing Phimosis. It affects less then 1% of adult males. Steroid creams can solve the problem 87% of the time. For those times where the cream does not work a small cut can be done on the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal required.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 03:41 AM
2

It is interesting that this woman is challenging the government based on concerns about women being harmed by men misusing the law. The trans gender person she mentions that challenged the law before it was passed had a focus on men's rights. It was well recognized that women's groups were most likely to abuse the law.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 03:02 PM
2

The Canadian anthem has had minor changes through out history. The push to make the anthem "gender neutral" was around long before Trudeau got into politics. The push came from politicians and not the public. The actual change was made while he was in office. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O_Canada
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:24 PM
1

The movie Hustlers was based on actual events. Never mind asking if the gender swapped movie would be made I don't think the gender swapped situation would happen in real life.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:11 PM
1

Do family courts generally side with the mother over the father? What benefit is it to the state to side with the mother most of the time? Why is it when vaccines become the issue brought before the family court that they suddenly side with the pro-vaccine side regardless of gender?
/r/MensRights13/02/20 01:58 PM
6

This goes into detail showing the fraud that the African HIV circumcision studies were. http://www.salem-news.com/fms/pdf/2011-12_JLM-Boyle-Hill.pdf
/r/MensRights07/02/20 02:11 PM
11

If this happened when your brother was an infant then it is likely that an adult decided to force separate the foreskin from the glans. They are suppose to be attached until puberty. This does cause problems for male infants and children. Circumcision seams like an extreme solution to this problem. Perhaps others here have a better solution. If this happened when he was older then it is called Phimosis. It affects less then 1% of adult males. Steroid creams can solve the problem 87% of the time.…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:42 PM
24

It is difficult for men that were cut as infants to understand what is missing. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings(Meissner's corpuscles). These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel n…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:58 PM
6

This is a good technical description of the practical example I have been providing for some time now. Here is what I have been saying. Gently brush the back of your hand. These are the pain nerve ending left over after circumcision. Gently brush the palm of your hand. These are tickle nerve endings that exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. If I even need to go into technical terms I will likely refer back to this post.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 01:34 AM
1

Testimony from someone that received the HPV shot. https://youtu.be/gffaPV9jU64?t=46
/r/MensRights22/01/20 03:47 PM
8

Before anyone goes in to do this they should be properly informed on the risks. Merck clinical trials show Percentage Serious Adverse Events after Gardasil vaccine is 2.5%. 2.3-2.5% doesn’t sound that bad until you compare apples to apples. Cervical cancer rates are always quoted as # per 100,000. Given the above information, for every 100,000 people using Gardasil 9 there would be 2,300 serious adverse events. The cervical cancer diagnosis rate in the United States is 7.9/100,000. You can verif…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 11:20 PM
1

believe that the WHO is ... aliens working ... with the CIA Have you considered taking anti-psychotics yourself?
/r/MensRights06/01/20 01:34 PM
2

Your making the claim. You support it.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 02:10 AM
3

Have you ever compared intact and cut male sensitivity? I compared intact male to cut male.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 01:51 AM
3

Pain is a sensation that many circumcised men have. The brain is a incredible organ that can turn pain into pleasure. There are many circumcised men that have to get themselves into the right mind set before they become interested in blowjobs because they have little more sensation then the back of a persons hand. I'm speaking from personal experience on this one. I didn't compare female with male, you did. I'm not trying to pretend I understand your sensations, why are you trying to tell me wha…
/r/MensRights27/12/19 11:47 PM
2

That would seem like an easy thing to solve legally. Some countries have had bills written up to make non-medically necessary circumcision illegal. None of them have passed into law due to lobby groups claiming religious discrimination. On a global scale it has proven to be an very difficult thing to solve. That said, I’ve never met a circumcised man who has been harmed like I was and I’ve been sexually intimate (with or without intercourse) with over 100 circumcised men. All had fully functioni…
/r/MensRights27/12/19 10:17 PM
3

Do you realize that you as an adult had to go to a medical professional to get your procedure done. Your talking to people here who were cut as infants and that it is legal for non-medical people to such as Rabbis to perform the procedure. Proper medical training is a noble goal but your talking to people that have got a much worse legal situation to overcome.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 09:32 PM
2

This is what happened when I explored the question "what is the difference?" https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights15/12/19 05:51 PM
3

My suspicion is that cut men are less likely to use condoms to increase sensitivity as much as possible. Lower condom use leads to more STD. The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 09:44 PM
3

Phimosis is just a glans and ridged band size thing which can be fixed with stretching. Don't know where this washing story came from. It might make sense if vigorous washing or other activity resulted in stretching.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 09:35 PM
3

Phimosis is not related to washing. It cannot be diagnosed until late puberty. The prepuce (foreskin/clitoral hood) is fused to the glans at birth and remains so until it naturally releases during puberty. It affects less then 1% of adult males. Steroid creams can solve the problem 87% of the time. For those times where the cream does not work a small cut can be done on the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal required.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 09:16 PM
2

The closest I've come to doing external therapy is posting and reading about the topic in online discussion forums. I learned a lot doing this. Internal processing such a writing for yourself then never showing your writings to anyone is also a good way of dealing with issues in general. A good forum for this topic is r/Intactivists/. Circumcision causes trauma and the saying laughter is the best medicine can be true. Of course laughter can also be used as a way of avoiding issues.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 02:55 PM
1

Yes it can take a while to admit even to ourselves that we made a bad decision. The knowledge is getting out there so people can make better decisions.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 07:38 PM
2

Phimosis is often used as a reason for circumcision but it is not actually a good reason. Phimosis cannot be diagnosed until late puberty. The prepuce (foreskin/clitoral hood) is fused to the glans at birth and remains so until it naturally releases during puberty. It affects less then 1% of adult males. Steroid creams can solve the problem 87% of the time. For those times where the cream does not work a small cut can be done on the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal required.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 02:22 PM
1

I've had the link to the image for so long I can't remember where I got it. That does look like the same study.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 02:20 PM
2

All great points for preventing the loss and damage. This post is more for the benefit of those that have already had the loss and damage. Understanding leads to mental and emotional healing, these words have been proven to help understanding.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 08:35 PM
8

Still trying to pretend that circumcision is not a men's rights issue. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, < We are still here then you win Keep fighting the fight sir, you know what comes next.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 12:05 AM
4

Personal preferences are fine. Just trying to give you a glimpse of what the other side might have been like.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 11:34 PM
5

It is difficult for men that were cut as infants to understand what is missing. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly black…
/r/MensRights21/11/19 11:08 PM
1

Not sure I agree with everything he is saying. For example he talks about a gender wage gap instead of earning gap. Over all I think the basic principle is sound though.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 02:07 PM
1

The article starts out with fear mongering talking about someone that died of cancer. It then claims they are certain that HPV is a cause of cancer and that HPV is a seriously big problem for both genders. It then goes through some of the history of research done by the vaccine manufacturer Merck which found that they could not prove there was a link between HPV, vaccine, and pre-cancerous lesions in the throat. Finally they get to the "new evidence" 2009 and 2016 ... HPV strains ... declined 37…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 02:59 PM
1

The article starts out with fear mongering talking about someone that died of cancer. It then claims they are certain that HPV is a cause of cancer and that HPV is a seriously big problem for both genders even though it is not a very common form of cancer and is a relatively mild form of cancer. It then goes through some of the history of research done by the vaccine manufacturer Merck which found that they could not prove there was a link between HPV, vaccine, and pre-cancerous lesions in the t…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 02:42 PM
1

This is a common story. A man in management that has power in the company dates a woman that has less power in the company. Now in terms of the relationship it is the woman that has power. If he says anything he can loose, if she says anything he can loose. It is like waiting for someone to flip a coin, heads she wins tales he looses.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 01:35 PM
3

It is difficult for men that were cut as infants to understand what is missing. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly black…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 01:23 PM
5

It might be interesting to add a column that lists which US states provide funding for male circumcision.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 01:52 PM
1

Circumcision has been linked with higher Alexithymia scores. Alexithymia which is the inability to process emotions which I think would make for more compliant soldiers when asked to do something against their conscience. http://intactnews.org/node/131/1316710012/study-links-circumcision-personality-trait-disorder
/r/MensRights21/10/19 02:48 PM
1

although it has benefits (Reduction in the probability of getting infected by HIV, STD) The STD claim does not match what is seen in the real world. The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's. The HIV-Circumcision studies have been proven faulty. They tested adult males for HIV, randomly circumcised half of them then tested for HIV 1 year later. The circumcised men could not have sex for 6-8 weeks while…
/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:24 PM
3

This guy seams to think of incels as people like the "Hunchback of Notre Dame" or "Phantom of the Opera" type characters the just need to adjust physical appearance and learn some game. This is certainly an aspect of it but it is not the whole story. He is right about there being a social engineered aspect to this whole thing but is missing how males have been social engineered into shame and guilt for even thinking about trying. It is not just about rejection it is also about getting in trouble…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 04:12 PM
3

It is difficult for men that were cut as infants to understand what is missing. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly black…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 01:43 PM
1

It is difficult for men that were cut as infants to understand the difference. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly black …
/r/MensRights08/10/19 04:53 PM
1

Any decent researcher and many posters to this subreddit will tell you that Wikipedia is not a reliable source of information. It is well known to be very politically biased. It can be a starting point but unless it is something basic like naming the planets in the solar system then never rely on it. The FDA link states that the vaccine is suppose to prevent cancer in the genital and anal areas. Cancer in these areas are measured in the x per 100,000 range which is far below the x per 100 seriou…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 09:48 PM
3

This guy cover it quite well. The tv series is set in the second age of middle earth. The wizards don't become a part of the story until the third age. That is just the first major fumble in this Gandalf statement. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIC6L0aBLr0
/r/MensRights02/10/19 02:06 PM
2

You still have not supported your initial claim that "risks of vaccination. They're pretty much negligible" recent Facebook photo From your testimonies link Here's the top article from their research section "Survey of parental attitudes in the North-West towards the HPV Vaccine" You already said you don't trust peoples opinions which is what Facebook, testimonies, and surveys are. Try looking at things on that site that are not opinions such as the following. Merck clinical trials show Percenta…
/r/MensRights29/09/19 06:25 PM
7

It is difficult for men that were cut as infants to have any concept of what the difference might be. This might give you some idea. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black …
/r/MensRights27/09/19 11:40 AM
11

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win Keep fighting the fight sir, you know what comes next.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 11:59 AM
2

https://www.bloodstainedmen.com/resources I'm sure these guys will have something that fits.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 07:20 PM
3

My first thought is what has changed to allow this to happen. The article covers a few things. First community programs. The CEO explains that the school has been implementing community programs, including partnering with public schools, in order to expose kids to dance at a young age. Suppose there are limits on how far they are willing to go. There was talk at one point of offering the classes to boys for free to encourage enrolment. "But as a woman, I couldn't stand the idea of offering class…
/r/MensRights20/09/19 12:41 PM
4

Phimosis cannot be diagnosed until late puberty. The prepuce (foreskin/clitoral hood) is fused to the glans at birth and remains so until it naturally releases during puberty. It affects less then 1% of adult males. Steroid creams can solve the problem 87% of the time. For those times where the cream does not work a small cut can be done on the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal required. To sum up Phimosis is never a good reason for circumcision.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 12:58 PM
2

ASKING 200 GIRLS FOR SEX (SOCIAL EXPERIMENT) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ira9A7wSW3M ASKING 100 GUYS FOR SEX (SOCIAL EXPERIMENT) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBtF3I7fDfU REJECTION EXPERIMENT: GUYS VS GIRLS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmP1ier3R30
/r/MensRights10/09/19 12:11 PM
4

Interesting, 32 years later and this topic has changed very little. The money, the medical industry manipulation, the religious arguments, and the technical arguments are all essentially the same. The main difference I can see is many people now say "intact" instead in "uncircumcised".
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:32 PM
1

Down and up votes without explanation are common on Reddit. Just how the website works. belief that if we're able to eradicate diseases like we did with Smallpox, but some people think that the method is bad because it can have side effects, even when side-effects are negligible and extremely rare, especially compared with actual diseases, we shouldn't let these people know about the risks. If they're 1/10,000, it's my opinion that those few deaths are a small price to pay for herd immunity and …
/r/MensRights05/09/19 04:52 PM
1

Your reaction to a down vote suggests you were triggered. Your promoting half-truths by saying "Don't mention the risks". Not exactly noble behavior. Your then saying "risks of vaccination. They're pretty much negligible" without providing any supporting evidence. Meanwhile actual evidence of vaccine problems are down voted and ignored by provaxers. Just for fun lets see what you do with this link. http://www.regret.ie/ Changed to non-encrypted link.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 12:10 PM
0

Three ingredients in Gardasil are aluminum, sodium borate and polysorbate 80. Both aluminum and sodium borate have an adverse effect on sperm production and polysorbate 80 can lead to primary ovarian failure in girls.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 01:05 PM
6

Apparently someone tried to compile the fatality statistics around circumcision and were not able to do it. It should be a simple comparison of was the procedure done and was there a death soon after. Apparently circumcision instances were not always recorded and the cause of death was usually attributed to something else. I would be interested is finding out where the 229 number came from.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:50 PM
3

There is no way you spent any time reading the information posted as it takes a lot more then 7 minutes to go through. As expected you are down to meaningless insult attempts. Thanks for playing.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 10:47 PM
4

These trails findings were fully supported by a large number of survey-based studies in United States and Africa.[5,6] In agreement with these views, the World Health Organization (WHO) The WHO is a strong pro-circumcision organization. There are direct conflict of interest issues there as well. The African HIV-Circumcision studies have been proven faulty many times. They tested adult males for HIV, randomly circumcised half of them then tested for HIV 1 year later. The circumcised men could not…
/r/MensRights03/09/19 10:27 PM
3

So you don't like the "natural body part" argument. Fine list something you believe is a benefit and it can be debunked. We are waiting.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 09:54 PM
5

Think your describing phimosis. The foreskin naturally releases from the glans during puberty. This can mean late puberty so phimosis cannot be properly diagnosed until then. It affects less then 1% of adult males. Steroid creams can solve the problem 87% of the time. For those times where the cream does not work a small cut can be done on the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal required.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 08:31 PM
4

Iceland where male circumcision was outlawed last year Didn't know this actually got passed into law. Thought that special interest groups had stopped it. This is good to hear.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 08:31 PM
3

Most of us have a selfish side so show the difference in work required. Here is the work that would need to be done to maintain a circumcised boy. Regular check for bleeding. Applying vaseline or similar creams to stop tissue trying to reattach. More frequent diaper changes if bleeding happens. Less likely to either bottle or breast feed properly. There is more that I can't recall right now. For intact just do the same as would be done for any other body part. Wet cloth, soap, and water. DO NOT …
/r/MensRights03/09/19 04:38 PM
10

Circumcision is usually the removal of the prepuce. In males the prepuce is called the foreskin. In females the prepuce is called the clitoral hood. The main difference between the two is size. I think it is fine for you to have an opinion about removal of someone's prepuce.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 01:52 PM
5

The most common reason for circumcision is belief. For many it is a religious belief. For others it is a belief that the medical doctor is telling the truth and knows what they are talking about. If genital medical attention is needed there is always a less invasive form of treatment then circumcision available.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 01:47 PM
2

A hand up can only be given to those that have fallen. Since these women have not fallen into some kind of distress this is a handout by definition.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 01:34 PM
9

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win Hi Doobie still fighting I see. You know what comes next.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 01:27 PM
9

The article you linked claims the following benefits. Urinary tract infections: This is more common in females then males and is considered trivial to treat. The circumcision operation carries the risk of infection. At best your trading one type of infection risk for another. Circumcision is not a benefit here. STD: The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's. Circumcision is not a benefit here. Penile C…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 06:05 PM
10

The article you linked admits that circumcision can cause problems. So now we can agree that it can be dangerous.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:30 PM
11

not going to be banned because it is not dangerous. https://i.redd.it/zjh4fl926pd11.png
/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:10 PM
14

I don't know about intelligence but it has been linked to Alexithymia which is the inability to process emotions. http://intactnews.org/node/131/1316710012/study-links-circumcision-personality-trait-disorder
/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:05 PM
11

This might give you an idea of the difference in experience. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly black while others feel …
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:59 PM
3

he’s a wee bit red He would have been a whole lot more red and bleeding and in need of medical attention if you had circumcised him. FYI DO NOT forcefully retract the foreskin. It is suppose to be attached to the glans at birth and will release when it is ready during puberty.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 12:51 PM
1

/r/Intactivists/
/r/MensRights26/08/19 02:09 AM
3

As far as I know the CDC is partly basing it's circumcision recommendation on the same faulty African circumcision-HIV studies that the WHO is using. The CDC's herpes and hpv reduction claim does not match what we see happening in the real world. In the real world the US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:06 PM
3

Sigh. The WHO is a strong pro-circumcision organization. There are direct conflict of interest issues there as well. The African HIV-Circumcision studies have been proven faulty many times. They tested adult males for HIV, randomly circumcised half of them then tested for HIV 1 year later. The circumcised men could not have sex for 6-8 weeks while they healed and had access to condoms and general medical hygiene information. The risk was found to drop from something like 2.5% to 1.2% which was c…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:55 PM
6

The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 07:41 PM
1

You have yet to provide anything but unsubstantiated claims. This could go on but I have better things to do. If you continue I might pick it up later.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:52 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:48 AM
1

Only the links I provided that proved my points. Sure I could find more if needed. Are you ever going to provide sources of information or just make more unsupported claims?
/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:43 AM
1

LOL Even the Indian guy that made the OP's video acknowledges gender equity laws have caused problems for Indian men and tries to down play it. It is true that since these gender equality laws have been put into place there have been a handful of false accusations. 2:56 Do you think you know what is happening in India better then the people that actually live there? LOL
/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:33 AM
3

Yeah but your brain wires itself with what it has. Even though you may have different feeling vision, your pleasure sight will be the same amount as if you were never circumcized always had full colour vision. This is your baseline. Kind of how when you're a baby, the first slightest amount of pain light is technically the worst pain you've ever felt most intense you've ever seen. If you haven't experienced the foreskin colour, you have no reference to that feeling. I hope you can see the fault …
/r/MensRights23/08/19 11:27 PM
2

Already answered the laws question. I'm not Indian so don't know the specific laws there. Have you ever heard of another country where this kind of organized extortion ring is happening? Since this kind of extortion depends on rape laws and the justice system I can only conclude it is possible because of the legal system specific to India. These guys do know Indian Law though. https://menrightsindia.net/category/law-misuse
/r/MensRights23/08/19 10:37 PM
2

Show me where this is happening in a ring run solely by women. I made the claim that these rape extortion rings against men are happening and are only possible due to the laws. I've shown that they are happening and the legal contribution was even stated in my quote from the OP video. If you don't believe that women can be villains without a male presence then that is on you. Rape statistics are unreliable in India with wide variety of reporting, poverty, and other methodological problems. But m…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 09:52 PM
2

showing the gender of those that are committing the crimes Remove the women or the rape laws directed at penalizing men and the extortion ring falls apart. Remove the male perpetrators and the crime can still work. You seam to want to make it the men's fault that the crime happened and turn the women into victims. I didn't bring up feminism but since you did this "men bad woman victim" assumption is a very common feminist thing to do. India has a huge problem with rape and gang rape going back a…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 08:55 PM
2

Maybe the first link could be considered to be cherry picked but what about the long list of rape extortion articles in the second link? Were they all cherry picked too? I had two numbered points I asked of you and you have not responded to either of them. Looks to me like your demanding I support my claims but your not willing to support yours.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 08:10 PM
3

Oh no you forced me to spend more then 30 seconds doing a web search. Here is a long list of articles surrounding the topic. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/rape-and-extortion Your turn. 1 What does the picture of the people running the extortion ring have to do with anything? 2 Show me evidence of rape gangs that didn't just turn out to be isolated incidents that were hyped up by the international news media.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 07:38 PM
2

I'm not Indian so don't know the specific laws there. Have you ever heard of another country where this kind of organized extortion ring is happening? Since this kind of extorsion depends on rape laws and the justice system I can only conclude it is possible because of the legal system specific to India. What does the picture of the people running the extortion ring have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights23/08/19 06:55 PM
5

https://indianexpress.com/article/india/noida-extortion-racket-busted-women-would-ask-for-lift-then-threaten-fake-rape-case-5776023/
/r/MensRights23/08/19 06:30 PM
1

I know the feeling but would still rather know the truth.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 06:28 PM
2

The difference is difficult to objectively measure. Maybe this will help. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly black while…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 05:04 PM
9

It is true that since these gender equality laws have been put into place there have been a handful of false accusations. 2:56 LOL From what I have heard there have been false rape accusation extortion rackets that have been happening in India that only exist because of these laws.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:15 PM
8

The WHO is a strong pro-circumcision organization. There are direct conflict of interest issues there as well. The African HIV-Circumcision studies have been proven faulty many times. They tested adult males for HIV, randomly circumcised half of them then tested for HIV 1 year later. The circumcised men could not have sex for 6-8 weeks while they healed and had access to condoms and general medical hygiene information. The risk was found to drop from something like 2.5% to 2% which was called a …
/r/MensRights21/08/19 04:09 PM
2

Porn addicts Women watch porn as well, they are just less likely to do it because they are more likely to have other options for relieving the tension. Sensitive Being cautious around someone so you don't set off an emotional outburst. This is not a gendered thing. Gym There are plenty of physically unfit people out there to choose from for both genders. Emotionally distant manipulators There is a term for people dealing with people like this. It is called being "friend zoned". Woke men who trea…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 01:29 PM
14

My first thought is endocrine disruptors. Not necessarily estrogen mimicking disruptors but that is where I would start. The testosterone levels in the adult population would be a place to look as well as apparently it has been falling globally for decades now. I would be interested in seeing the miscarriage rate for this town and if they are male fetuses being lost.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 01:32 PM
2

to conclude from this that male female Googlers are underpaid overpaid is "an oversimplification"
/r/MensRights16/08/19 12:37 PM
3

men’s right advocates ... overshadowed by social justice warriors.... and rightly so This line makes it look like you think social-justice-warriors are always right and just. The right-wrong, good-evil, with us or against us, no middle ground, and rejection of evidence that contradicts their belief is the reason they are called social-justice-warriors. The term is a recognition of their inherent limitations.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 02:47 PM
2

The only time I recall seeing women deliberatley sitting on random men's laps I was in a strip club.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 01:09 PM
10

Even if such an incredibly unlikely thing did happen removal of the entire foreskin would not be needed. Just create an opening large enough for urine to come out and leave the foreskin alone.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:52 PM
3

not all women are super radical feminist Karens that hate men I'm curious about the term "Karens". Where did this term come from, I'm not familiar with it?
/r/MensRights21/07/19 01:53 PM
3

After having gone through this I suspect it was written by a woman. since I am a male. Competition is a natural thing and both boys and girls do it. It is not a gendered thing. At elementary school we used to think we were better than girls and were trying to compete with them. Most elementary level education is suited to female behaviour patterns so it is no surprise girls were getting better grades. I doubt the boys were really beating the girls at sports because before puberty girls are gener…
/r/MensRights20/07/19 03:52 PM
7

Forced retraction of fused infant foreskin often leads to infection. The foreskin will release from the glans on it's own when it is ready during puberty.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 12:30 PM
2

The clitoris is a very large sexually pleasurable sensitive organ that goes under the skin. Removing the external tip of the clitoris does happen but not always. Reversing this form of circumcision removes surface scar tissue to allow the clitoral tissue under the skin to come to the surface. There is no form of female circumcision that removes the entire clitoris as it would be too much tissue. A common and considered lesser form of male circumcision removes all of the sexually pleasurable sens…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 12:04 PM
4

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, We are still here "then they fight you," then you win
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:43 AM
6

Looks like Justice for men and boys (and the women who love them) political party might actually be making an impact.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:41 AM
3

Erin Pizzey web site on domestic violence. https://honest-ribbon.org/
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:19 PM
1

From what I can see the people that make the laws are often out of touch with the people that have to live under them. Many laws are created by lobby groups and they put corporate or private interests first which rarely have the best interests of the general population in mind. For example many of the "feminist and misandrist laws in many countries" being passed today are put in place by female biased lobby groups that know how to manipulate the system.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 10:04 PM
1

Your missing the point. There are so many rules that everyone breaks some. There is no way to follow them all. That way the state can accuse anyone they want of wrong doing and people like you will always support the state rules even when it is in the wrong. Sometimes the rules are in the wrong and are what is inexcusable. For example it used to be a crime in Britain to skip church on Sundays. Under the letter of the law if a ambulance, police vehicle, fire truck, and mail truck are trying to ge…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 09:20 PM
3

Is J-walking or speeding inexcusable? These are technically crimes. There are so many rules and laws in existence that you are probably committing "crimes" every day that your not even aware of. Do you think these are inexcusable?
/r/MensRights01/07/19 01:16 PM
10

Phimosis happens in less then 1% of mature men. Topical steroid cream has an 87% cure rate. For the rare cases where the cream does not work a small cut can be done on the ridged band to open thing up enough to let the head out. No tissue removal required. Circumcision is a cure for phimosis as a sledgehammer is to tapping in a finishing nail.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 07:35 PM
11

Here is one reason. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly black while others feel high pain sensitivity or blinding white.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 11:12 AM
0

I'm point out that neither circumcision or the vaccine are as effective as many medical people claim. The argument your using is don't use this ineffective method that causes problems because a different likely ineffective method exists that has it's own set of problems. All that is needed is to show that circumcision method is ineffective like was done elsewhere in this thread. https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/alleged-medical-benefits/cervical-cancer/
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:35 AM
1

I'm point out that saying the HPV vaccine exists is not a strong argument against circumcision because the effectiveness is likely exaggerated. I didn't even mention the side effects the vaccine manufacturer admits exists. Use this argument instead. https://www.shemazing.net/female-led-scientist-team-find-a-cure-for-hpv-infection-after-20-years/
/r/MensRights26/06/19 01:35 AM
1

Here is a study that suggests the HPV vaccination is only shifting the type of HPV that shows up in cervical cancer. This may suggest certain HPV type effectiveness but it does not mean cervical cancer prevention effectivness. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907297/ Shift in prevalence of HPV types in cervical cytology specimens in the era of HPV vaccination Consequently, in HPV+ women of 16–22 years of age, who are more likely to be protected against certain HPV types by vaccinati…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 10:15 PM
1

Do you understand that the cervical cancer rate was significantly decreasing before the vaccine was introduced? Here is another link that says much the same. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jo/2016/3056407/ In Australia over the last decade there has been a decline in the incidence of low-grade squamous dysplasia across all age groups, particularly noticeable in women aged 20 to 24 years. This change predated introduction of the national vaccination program. The incidence of high-grade squamous…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 09:13 PM
1

A look at the actual data says otherwise. https://cervical-cancer.canceraustralia.gov.au/statistics In 2015, the age-standardised incidence rate was 6.9 cases per 100,000 females. In 2019, it is estimated that the age-standardised incidence rate will be 7.2 cases per 100,000 females. Whatever happened before the HPV vaccine was introduced seamed to be effective. The number of new cases of cervical cancer diagnosed decreased from 966 in 1982 to 857 in 2015. Over the same period, the age-standardi…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 08:17 PM
2

The gender earning gap for those in their 20's when most dating happens is in woman's favour. It is not until 40 that the gender earning gap is in men's favour. Apparently for those that never marry it remains in women's favour. This trend has been around for a very long time. https://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/aug/29/women-in-20s-earn-more-men-same-age-study-finds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUpgoayBPJc
/r/MensRights24/06/19 01:43 PM
2

Message from a doctor of randomness. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1roCscTXjg Now for a little humour from the random doctor with a cam. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ytZsWMmoGs
/r/MensRights20/06/19 01:25 PM
5

By this logic I could ask why do female doctors perform circumcisions. I could then theorize about a desire to cause pain and suffering on the opposite sex. The same arguments could then be said of male doctors performing circumcisions. So in a completely biased and narrow view of the world I'll ask why do women become gynecologists? Is it because they like to see other women in pain?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:34 AM
2

Recall hearing that the majority of the rescue dogs on 9/11 died within a couple of years. Human life span being longer we are seeing the same thing happen to the people.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 01:07 PM
1

One comment does not make a pattern. If we persecuted everyone for every minor comment there would be no innocents anywhere.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 11:14 PM
6

Keep fighting the fight sir, you know what comes next.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 12:53 AM
3

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, We are here "then they fight you," then you win
/r/MensRights02/06/19 08:56 PM
29

First they ignore you, We are here " then they laugh at you, " then they fight you, then you win
/r/MensRights02/06/19 06:16 PM
1

This is why i made the conscious decision last year to become a woman. This is a big decision and the following video covers people that have made a similar decision and what they experienced as a result. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlRkLtKqSrY
/r/MensRights02/06/19 02:57 PM
6

For guys circumcised later in life there is a change in sensitivity. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly black while othe…
/r/MensRights30/05/19 11:59 AM
8

It will be difficult for you to accept so I'll just debunk one of your beliefs. You can work out the other beliefs later. The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 11:17 PM
2

Have not watched your video so can't say how much it goes into men's issues. The speech I posted covers sexual abuse of boys which is a men's issue. Take the push to make boys behave more like girls seen in education too an extreme and this speech is a result.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 05:28 PM
12

Oh now I understand you. It is difficult to understand what one is missing when they have never had it to begin with. This should give a brief glimpse. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is …
/r/MensRights29/05/19 05:13 PM
12

Circumcision is "actual deliberate discrimination". It is done mostly to males and laws in this area deliberately discriminate on the basis of sex. You may have higher priorities but circumcision deserves the high men's rights priority it is given.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 04:50 PM
11

Who said anything about "hatred"? Circumcision is easily one of the most recognizable Men's Rights issues there is. The Right to Intact Genitals for males.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 02:38 PM
3

I think your referring to the White Feather campaign which is a very similar name.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 11:27 PM
17

Woman realizes that males that she cares about in her life are at an inherent disadvantage and thinks this is a recent development between the sexes. This scenario is common.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 02:31 PM
3

The video at the link says it was done by the white ribbon Australia. If you want honest information on this topic go to https://honest-ribbon.org/.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 02:03 PM
7

Only rumour but interesting comments on HIV studies done in Africa. https://youtu.be/Pqc9yZUKD0E?t=26
/r/MensRights25/05/19 01:19 PM
1

Much of the stuff circumcision prevents can be deal with less painful treatments. Not according to a lot of the medical-industry. Many in that industry claim circumcision is the best choice. They make money off of it. How many non-medical industry sources did you look at before you stopped trusting them on this issue? Same can't be said about vaccines, depending on the virus a person gets infected with, if the immunological defense system never got a contact with it, the person is out. This is w…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 04:01 PM
1

to let kids live longer than 3 years Wonder how your grandparents and great-grandparents lived long enough to have children. That is a ridiculous statement. So you agree with this the medical community on this action. In fact, many doctors and doctors groups do not even believe there should be choice around what information parents consume on the vaccine issue. Members of the AAP celebrated on social media when Amazon removed anti-vaccine books and movies from their listings. Dr. Peter Hotez, a …
/r/MensRights22/05/19 03:03 PM
1

Having trouble believing you read the article. It covers conflicting arguments on each topic and not the the good or bad of either issue. My personal opinion on either issue appears nowhere in this article.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:35 PM
1

None of what you said has anything to do with the knowledge brought up in the article. You clearly still have a lot to learn and it looks like your not willing to even look.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:04 PM
1

You mentioned an argument concerning both circumcision and vaccination. The person that wrote the article goes into much more depth on this topic. I'm adding to the knowledge base on this. It is not as simple as you think.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:39 PM
1

https://medium.com/@bdmarotta/medical-groups-circumcision-argument-undermines-their-vaccine-campaign-18cfa4e2346 There is a saying that where ever there appears to be a double standard, you can be sure there is one standard being secretly applied. Doctors make money on vaccines, and make an argument for them. Doctors also make money doing circumcisions, and make a completely different and incompatible argument for them. It looks like the golden rule in action — the real golden rule — “he who has…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:54 AM
22

If circumcision prevents STD's in any way the effect is negligible. The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:40 AM
6

I know a tall man approximately 6'6" who haunched over most of his life because his height intimidated people. Haunching is not a gender thing it is a tall thing.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:32 AM
6

Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. Affirmative action programs (2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration o…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 09:50 PM
2

Some posts talking about the sensation side to the discussion. https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:44 PM
2

Before puberty girls have a physical advantage over boys. Anyone banning boys so that the girls are not disadvantaged does not even know the basic physiology of the children they are teaching.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 12:07 PM
1

Have to call BS on this monkey story. This kind of faulty thinking is a direct result of false belief that gender is a social construct. She does not understand her own gender if she thinks women are not aggressive.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 11:58 AM
3

For point 1 it is supply and demand. Get women into the work force areas that are mostly male increases the work supply while the demand remains relatively unchanged. This leads to lower pay for all workers in that field. The more specialized the work the greater resistance to increases in supply.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 01:26 PM
1

Nature (Sex) vs Nurture (Gender) Your giving way more credit to the nurture side of things then it deserves. Boys showing an interest in things and girls showing interest in faces has been shown to be inherent even in new born infants. I've heard it said that boys eyes are better at detecting movement and girls eyes are better at seeing colour variation. Probably the reason female colour blindness is so extremely rare compared to male colour blindness. If anything natural boy behaviour is being …
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:39 PM
1

Femininity and masculinity are social constructions. Right from the first line you stated something that is simply false. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you agree that there are significant physical differences. Do you think that those physical differences extend to hormonal differences? Do you think those hormonal differences extend to behavioural differences? If you can follow this then there are inherent differences that have nothing to do with social influences.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:54 PM
4

It is unlikely that circumcision prevents STD's at any age. The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:14 PM
3

One person that very aware of circumcision issues has found that a ethical argument comparison can be done to vaccines. https://medium.com/@bdmarotta/medical-groups-circumcision-argument-undermines-their-vaccine-campaign-18cfa4e2346
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:05 PM
3

This is the first I'm seeing of this so responding now. This is a medical issue for me, not a religious issue. I'll go through the studies you posted. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17935209 Circumcision of males represents a surgical "vaccine" against a wide variety of infections If this were true then it should be seen in real world situations. The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's. If circu…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 04:38 PM
8

Have to have some respect for this organization. They know their stuff and it may be hard to measure how much of a difference they are making but they are making a difference for the better. https://www.bloodstainedmen.com/
/r/MensRights04/05/19 12:28 PM
5

I go with option 3. Provide as much verifiable and rational information as possible and let the viewer decide for themselves if the information is "knocking up/down".
/r/MensRights26/04/19 02:18 PM
8

My guess is different definitions of rape. That man kissed me once. It is like he tried to rape me. That woman and I kissed once. She didn't seam that interested so we went our separate ways. These examples maybe a little exaggerated but gets the point across.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 12:27 PM
11

Smegma is actually like natural anti-bioitic soap. It actually keeps things cleaner. Women produce it in greater quantities then intact men. https://youtu.be/Pqc9yZUKD0E?t=84
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:34 PM
3

heard the sensitivity arguments and all that. I still don’t buy it. It is a difficult one to understand. Yes it obviously still works enough to get the critical part of the job done. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. For some they react strongly causing pain and for others they are numb. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating tickle nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the fore…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 01:02 PM
3

If a man cheats or starts watching porn because the woman has been with holding sex for a prolonged period of time then who's fault is that?
/r/MensRights17/04/19 11:48 AM
2

Only if you prematurely force retraction of the foreskin from the glans(head). Keeping the penis clean in an intact non-retracted infant is the same as keeping any other extremity clean such as arms or legs. The foreskin will release on it's own when it is ready during puberty.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 03:17 AM
7

The foreskin is fused to the glans(head) at birth. It releases on it's own during puberty. The leading cause of infection complications is adults forcefully retracting the foreskin before it is ready to naturally release.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 04:24 PM
6

The mind may not remember but the body does. The infants developing nervous system is flooded with trauma hormones that make the child have higher sensitivity to pain later in life. In intact infants the foreskin is fused to the glans making it protected while cut infants have exposed uretheras and surgical scars leading to higher risk of complications.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 04:24 PM
5

Here is one small example of the difference. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. This is one of the pleasure nerve endings that exists in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly black while …
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:27 PM
5

Phimosis cannot be properly diagnosed until late puberty. It happens in less then 1% of intact adult males and is treatable with steroid cream which is successful about 87% of the time. For those cases where it is not successful a cut can be done on the ridged band which opens things up enough to allow movement. No tissue removal required! It is unfortunate that more people and especially doctors don't know this basic information.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:21 PM
14

Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. This is one of the pleasure nerve endings that exists in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly black while others feel high pain sensitivity or blinding…
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:53 AM
2

This video might explain some of the reaction that your describing. MEETING THE ENEMY A feminist comes to terms with the Men's Rights movement
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:12 PM
1

Merck lists serious adverse events on page 7 of it's vaccine insert. https://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil_9/gardasil_9_pi.pdf Out of the 15,705 individuals who were administered GARDASIL9 and had safety follow-up, 354 reported a serious adverse event; representing 2.3% of the population. As a comparison, of the 7,378 individuals who were administered GARDASIL and had safety follow-up, 185 reported a serious adverse event; representing 2.5% of the population. Four GARDASIL9 r…
/r/MensRights06/04/19 01:49 PM
-1

Looks like you know enough to know that the "saved his boys life" statement can't be supported. It would be amusing to see you try though.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 09:40 PM
-2

https://prepforthat.com/la-whooping-cough-outbreak-linked-to-30-vaccinated-teens/ Of those 30 teens, all were vaccinated, according to officials. Only 18 kids opted out of the pertussis vaccination, none of which are sick.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 08:38 PM
-4

This look similar to cases where one parent takes their child to be circumcised against the wishes of the other simply because of beliefs.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 12:51 PM
1

It is thought that when a king was the ruling monarch he took care of issues both foreign and domestic. When a queen was the ruling monarch she took care of foreign issues while he took care of domestic issues. Because queens were less burdened they had more time to wage war.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 01:58 PM
13

Badly done HIV/Circumcision studies done in Africa. Don't know why but the WHO still refers to these studies to support it's pro-circumcision position.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 01:21 PM
35

boys who are not circumcised are more prone to ... The article than goes on to list many points which are false. more prone to sexually transmitted diseases The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's. Bacteria and viruses can get trapped in the extra layers of skin left on the penis. This is due to premature forced foreskin retraction. The foreskin is fused to the glans(head) at birth and remains so unt…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 01:15 PM
3

Thanks for this analysis. Have not looked at this topic from this perspective before and it provides new insight.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 02:35 PM
12

My first thought was a non-feminist prime minister would be a welcome change. The infighting among these hyper sensitive ideologues is in my opinion inevitable.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 01:59 PM
5

Circumcision does not mean balanitis can't happen. The wikipedia page shows a circumcised penis with balanitis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanitis
/r/MensRights19/03/19 01:47 PM
6

One example is the type of sensation between intact and cut being different. Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating ticklish nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. It can be said that being intact is to seeing in colour as being cut is to seeing in black and white. Some cut men feel numbness or mostly black wh…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 01:34 PM
8

Your one of those that needs hard evidence. Well here is evidence. Note: The vast majority (not all) of these links from reputable scientific journals, with peer-reviewed research. 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healcthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://onlin…
/r/MensRights11/03/19 02:18 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaEoQVZnN8I
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:59 PM
1

The following discussion threads have been described as "a very good explanation on the sensations and the cons of circumcision". https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:40 PM
5

Your cousin probably had his foreskin prematurely retracted. The foreskin is meant to be attached to the glans(head) until puberty. Forced retraction is the main cause of penis and urinary tract infections in children. DO NOT RETRACT FORESKINS, THEY WILL RELEASE ON THERE OWN WHEN THEY ARE READY.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 03:19 PM
3

The doll being subject to constant change might have actually helped it become bigger as there was always a new version to buy that fans didn't have.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:24 PM
1

the vaccination did work Your story does not support that statement. each time the measles was in a weaker form Your natural immunity built up each time. first time i had measles it was followed by mumps Did this happen before or after the Measles/Mumps/Rubella vaccine? my doctor for about 20 years explained that it happens( he had several patients that went through this ) So your doctor saw several patients get the measles more then once. That was considered to be rare before the vaccine became…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 11:04 PM
1

This is one of the best descriptions of the male and female genital structures that I'm aware of. https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=11&v=DD2yW7AaZFw
/r/MensRights07/03/19 01:27 AM
2

Before the measles vaccines people got the measles once then had lifetime immunity. You had "measles vaccine immunity" then got it 3 times followed closely by "mumps vaccine immunity" failure. The simplest explanation is that the vaccine didn't work and it might have made you sicker.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 01:14 AM
6

The effect where pain can become pain pleasure is a weird thing.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 10:47 PM
1

The numbers seam to be decreasing over time. Generally it is 9,000 clitoral hood and 20,000 for the foreskin. When I first saw these numbers it was 22,000 for the foreskin. These are just relative numbers and the actual nerve ending count is likely much higher.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 10:03 PM
3

I decided to try and answer the circumcision sensation question some time ago. The following threads were the result. Hope the threads provide some insight. https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights06/03/19 09:56 PM
1

This is how measles was viewed before the vaccine was put on the market. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDb0ZS3vB9g
/r/MensRights06/03/19 04:50 PM
0

Natural herd immunity: People get sick once and become immune for life. Women can pass immunity to unborn children. This happens with measles. Vaccine herd immunity: Requires periodic booster shots and immunity cannot be passed on to children. Which is better?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 04:36 PM
-1

https://prepforthat.com/la-whooping-cough-outbreak-linked-to-30-vaccinated-teens/ Of the teens currently diagnosed, 30 of them are said to attend Harvard-Westlake where tuition averages $40,000 annually. Of those 30 teens, all were vaccinated, according to officials. Only 18 kids opted out of the pertussis vaccination, none of which are sick.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 03:08 PM
-3

At least the UK still has the concept of choice. It seams like in some North American jurisdictions are trying to remove all choice and force it on everybody.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 01:17 PM
6

The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:36 PM
5

First they ignore you Then laugh at you, and hate you Then they fight you Then you win. When you go public with opinions that you can back up you will deal with people at all stages of acceptance.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 01:57 PM
11

The anti-MGM people on this sub outnumber the pro-MGM people.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 05:50 PM
4

There are those that can understand the following two descriptive links and those that demand lengthy scientific studies. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/ Here are some lengthy scientific studies. Note: The vast majority (not all) of these links from reputable scientific journals, with peer-reviewed research. 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 02:00 PM
6

This was my attempt to answer this question. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights17/02/19 09:44 PM
8

This is the best comparison that I have come up with for men cut as infants. Gently brush the back of your hand. Your stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings left over after circumcision. For some they react strongly causing pain and for others they are numb. Gently brush the palm of your hand. Your stimulating tickle nerve endings. This is one type of pleasure nerve ending that exists in the foreskin in high concentrations.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 09:01 PM
2

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 02:46 PM
15

A 66-year-old US citizen of Libyan descent was held responsible for practising a circumcision operation on two two-year-old Nigerian brothers. ... Nigerian mother who had claimed asylum in Europe Looks like this is an African/US cultural practice that happened in Italy. Hope the Italians continue to push back against this kind of imported cultural practice.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 02:29 PM
59

Looks like the "man bad, woman good" narrative is alive and well among the people that have enough money to push that propaganda.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:35 PM
11

What that woman did was arguably worse then rape. It was sexual assault that is a permanent mark on his body. He did try to make the best of his situation by making a pron video. Apparently is was not very good but at least he tried to make the best of a bad situation.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:03 PM
3

primary schools ... Organisers said it was aimed at encouraging more girls to take part while boys' physical strength sometimes put them at an advantage. ... age gap could be from nine to 11-year-olds At the primary school ages it is often the girls that have the physical advantage over the boys. This changes during puberty. Whoever made this policy does not understand basic childhood physiology.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 04:08 PM
-2

I agree, neither person should be excused for what they posted. Both of them deserve to be criticized. The vote count suggests that only one should be criticized though.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 01:23 AM
-8

There is no evidence either of these people actually have any idea what they are talking about. It is more likely they are just repeating what someone else has said.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 08:27 PM
6

Anybody can have opinions on any matter! The more research one has done on a topic the more weight can be given to that opinion. The status of one's gendered or childless state is not relevant.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 02:43 PM
12

It occurs to me that your just going to keep going back to claiming that I'm not using medical research and hard facts. I didn't put this list together but it contains many medical researched facts. Male circumcision causes terrible damage to the male penis, and psychological problems that can last a lifetime. In western Europe there is now a growing movement to outlaw it as genital mutilation, on a par with FGM. Note: The vast majority of these links from reputable scientific journals, with pee…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 05:10 AM
3

Do you really believe that sex education is that different between western nations? The "JAMA, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine" quote is trying to support it's circumcision position by talking about the completely different vaccine topic. That is a very weak argument. If they want to talk about circumcision then they should talk about circumcision. The same type tickle nerve endings that exist in the palm of your hand also exist in the foreskin. That is a hard fact.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 05:01 AM
6

reduces your risk of getting a plethora of diseases. The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's. effect of male circumcision on sexual performance and enjoyment Gently brush the back of your hand. Your stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings left over after circumcision. For some they react intensely causing pain and for others they are numb. Gently brush the palm of your hand. Your …
/r/MensRights06/02/19 04:38 AM
11

There are so many similarities that the medical term "prepuce" is used to refer to both the male foreskin and the female clitoral hood. The main difference is size. https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/prepuce
/r/MensRights06/02/19 04:23 AM
3

assholes hang out with other assholes and watching one Gillette commercial is not going to turn a Donald Trump into a Justin Trudeau. Regardless of what someone thinks of Donald Trump to suggest that Justin Trudeau is someone worth emulating shows she has a long way to go. Well it is encouraging to see how the Gillette ad is getting some feminists to push back against the most hard core feminists.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 02:30 PM
2

There is evidence that circumcised men have lost something on a mental or emotional level. The brain has amazing capacity for healing and I think given the ideal circumstances much of this loss can be restored. As for the feet being useful analogy I think the movement that foreskin provides is much more significant then most circumcised men realize. Researchers find circumcised men have higher alexithymia scores than intact men. Alexithymia is the inability to process emotions. http://intactnews…
/r/MensRights02/02/19 02:40 PM
7

There has been a growing number of US filed indictments for more then a year and they are not just about gender. My guess is that a lot of them will be unsealed this year. So yes I think it will be a big lawsuit year.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 02:15 PM
2

I think "projection" is a good way to describe it. They accuse others of doing what they themselves are doing.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:23 PM
5

While this is a good interview and Dr. Warren Farrel has done a lot of good things for men there is no single person that can be called a "founder" of the MRM. There are simply too many individual groups around the world addressing specific male issues that are lumped together under the label MRM.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:53 PM
2

The 8000 number for the female prepuce (clitoral hood) and the 20,000 number for the male prepuce (foreskin) are just relative estimates. The actual numbers are probably much higher. At one time the number 22,000 was used but I suppose it got rounded down to 20,000. It is my guess that "Lizzy the Lezzy" is very vulnerable to internet trolls.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 02:34 PM
1

People instinctively look other people up and down when first entering a conversation. It is not a gendered response. It can be as simple as judging physical distance between people. She is much shorter then he is so there is a more pronounced glance down. He probably was not trying to look at her boobs but they are hard miss. It is quite likely that she is making the glance sexual when it is not.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:10 PM
1

Some interesting things but there is some weird feminist theory creeping into it. For example the idea that a male nurse being a "macho tough guy" is unacceptable because they can't be nurturing and have empathy. People that suggest this kind of thing are the ones without empathy or understanding.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 07:49 PM
10

This is the result of many years of manipulation at the top levels of the US military. https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/197-military-officers-purged-by-obama/
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:43 PM
51

Best lines from the video comment section. Get woke, Go broke Judging by the number of people stating they have to by their razors elsewhere now the more they push this ad the more they are going to lose.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 10:11 PM
6

point this out to the "Sex is a social construct" crowd I don't think that people that actually believe the social construct line can be reasoned with. Think that best you can do is make sure there are people that can view the interaction so they can judge the merits of both side for themselves. It is good your thinking about possible scenarios of how such a discussion might happen.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 03:47 PM
2

As we go through life we all have experiences which we decide that we don't want to get into again. We develop automatic subconscious behaviour to avoid those experiences. It says a lot about society that there are enough men that have developed an avoidance of relations with women that we have words like MGTOW to describe it. It is not even something that is only happening in western societies as they are called herbivores or grass eaters in Japan as a attempt at throwing insult.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 04:02 PM
5

nothing constructive goes on in these subs ... where they don't ban The feminist subreddit banes has lead many people to this subreddit. So they have been constructive from this subreddits perspective.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 10:58 PM
92

Israel is listed as being gender equal. Surprising to me. RT documentary "No Woman, No Crime: Israeli Men, legally harassed by women" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahZTWBB26Cw
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:41 PM
1

Of course men cry. When men handle their grief in ways other than crying it is common for people to claim that he is not processing his emotions when in truth he is.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:56 AM
1

Of course we do. For example someone gets sad. How that emotion is expressed can depend on the gender. When a woman is sad she is more likely to express it through crying then a man is. Our tear ducts are physically designed that way. The tears can lead to words which can be constructive or destructive. A man is more likely to express their sadness through anger or frustration which can translate into action of some kind which can be constructive or destructive.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:26 AM
6

Men do not process emotions the same way that women do. For example traditional gender processing roles for funerals is the women get together and talk things out while the men carry the casket and perform similar physical roles. In other words the women talk while the men do something. Men are expressing and processing their emotions constantly it is just that most people have been trained not to be able to recognize it when it is happening.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 01:48 PM
5

Wifman and wifmen are old words that have become woman and women. Weremen and wereman are old words that have been dropped from the English language. Today when we refer to adult males we use the gender neutral terms man and men.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 01:35 PM
1

Following the Feminist model will not work. Some would say its success due to inherent gender differences which favour women by default. eg(the women are wonderful effect). Others would say feminism is successful is due to a small group of people with billions of dollars over decades pushing it. I think it is a combination of both. Being polite and stating facts has not worked as you become ignored as happened to Warren Farrel. Starting institutions has not work as they are taken over and twiste…
/r/MensRights31/12/18 12:03 AM
2

So it was not you down voting? It is always a guessing game as to who is down voting. This subreddit is used to feminist down vote brigades. Feminists are not banned here as happens when MensRights posters go to feminist subreddits. We generally welcome dialogue. Edit: It looks to me like your in the early stages of learning about men issues. This video is a good description of the stages that you can expect to be going through. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WMuzhQXJoY
/r/MensRights30/12/18 09:58 PM
1

Interesting how you decided to ignore the criticism that comes after the word moron. It makes me wonder if the first part of the comment might have been right. It is also interesting how a series of down votes happened at about the same time as you were making your comment.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 09:03 PM
1

I think we are in agreement.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 06:06 PM
3

Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought that California has a majority white population. I would expect any gathering in a majority white population to consist of mostly white people.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 02:55 PM
2

This question seams to have brought out the people that don't yet understand that feminism is not the same as women. Good job. There is nothing wrong with criticizing the feminist ideology as doing so says nothing about women as a group.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 02:49 PM
4

Donald Trump and Brett Kavanagh were accused of sexual assault because they were trying to ruin those men's lives. The foundation for those accusations were so weak that they didn't work. Sexual assault allegations are a weapon.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 02:13 PM
18

They keep saying the word "forced". I knew students that were forced to work in the cafeteria making minimum wage in order to stay in school. While they may have been forced to take a job to make ends meet the women had an extra option of sex work which is not available to the men. There is a good chance that many of these sex workers are more grounded then their gender studies professors.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 02:06 PM
28

Higher food prices. The average male body requires more calories then the average female body due to physical size. Cuts to wages. Depends on where the cuts happen. About 5-10 years ago there was talk about a mansession because economic down turn had eliminated a lot of traditionally male jobs while traditional female jobs did not change much. failure to respond by investing in social infrastructure There is a lot of social infrastructure investment in woman only programs so I guess there is som…
/r/MensRights19/12/18 02:33 PM
10

It may not have been suppressing emotions that caused the condition. For example it has been found that men circumcised as infants are more likely to have higher Alexithymia scores. Alexithymia is the inability to process emotions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexithymia
/r/MensRights17/12/18 03:31 PM
3

The greatest difficulty has always been getting leaders to run the meetings and go to camp. Over time the regulations that one needs to pass to become a leader has increased meaning that it has become that much harder to find new leaders.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 05:10 PM
4

The slow death or a great organization by ever increasing restrictive regulations due to fear of the possibility of something going wrong. I agree it has been happening for a long time.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 05:58 PM
5

Gently brush the back of your hand. Your stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings left over after male circumcision. For some they react strongly causing pain and for others they are numb. Gently brush the palm of your hand. Your stimulating tickle nerve endings which is one of the types of nerve endings that exists in the prepuce(foreskin) in high concentrations.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 03:36 PM
5

I’ll be taking advice from the medical community, read all the reasesch on the subject there is and decide with my husband and his opinions on the subject what’s best for our children. If they are going strictly from research then the following should help sway their opinion. Note: The vast majority (not all) of these links from reputable scientific journals, with peer-reviewed research. 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healcthcentral.…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:17 PM
24

She said more research was necessary to understand why participants' personal norms are that "it is more acceptable for females and males to engage in these behaviours (in clubs), especially as it seems to differ from traditional gender values that women should be chaste in public environments". Clubs are a sexually charged environment and physical contact is a big part of sex. The traditional woman chaste narrative has not been in play for at least a couple of generations. It was replaced with …
/r/MensRights30/11/18 02:48 PM
5

"My vision for the Me Too movement is part of a collective vision to see a world free of sexual violence," Sexual violence can cause trauma but so can punishment for sexual acts that were not committed. Either way it is trauma and sex is at the center of it. The metoo movement has expanded to include cleaning up both sources of trauma by demanding an end to the violence and calling out dishonesty.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 02:04 PM
3

For a while there was a site called whiteribbon.org that viewed domestic violence in a gender balanced way. The domain name got taken over by white ribbon organization claiming copy right infringement. The gender balanced website still exists, it is called https://honest-ribbon.org/
/r/MensRights28/11/18 02:13 PM
2

I find it interesting that when sexual liberation comes to an area how that liberation seams to happen. Sex shops open up with toys and lingerie for women. Women start doing call in sex shows or in this case doing sex workshops for women or couples. They even start doing talks in schools according to this article. This often happens while talking about how hard it is to break through the past where this topic was taboo. Meanwhile there is a seedy underbelly of porn, strip clubs, and escorts wher…
/r/MensRights26/11/18 03:49 PM
2

Men have the sexual selection power of choosing who they want to put effort in trying to impress. Just the way it works.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 02:54 PM
2

Wikipedia shows an image of a circumcised penis with Balinitis. It does claim that the condition is less common among circumcised men. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanitis
/r/MensRights22/11/18 01:59 PM
1

There are public and private opinions. For private opinions I think your right, people holding such extreme positions are rare. For publicly expressed opinions I think you will find people like this. For females they refer to themselves as victims of something male. For males they start their comments by saying something about checking their privilege.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 10:16 PM
2

Slut walks would be a good place to start looking for such people.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 09:29 PM
28

Circumcised males also have less instances of penile cancer. Penile cancer is very rare and only happens in older men. If you don't have a foreskin you can't get cancer on the foreskin. If your prone to get cancer it will just happens somewhere else on the body. phimosis occurs more often than meatal steanosis, and phimosis is unheard of in circumcised males I suspect that most men that have meatal steanosis just live with it so there is no real way to know how common it is. Phimosis is the fore…
/r/MensRights21/11/18 03:55 PM
2

I like the thought that the "toxic masculinity" term originated due to a concern for male well being. There are likely some people that take this approach. I think it much more likely that most people push the term out of a concern for female well being. Things like no-means-no, don't-be-that-guy, don't-objectify, your-not-expressing-your-emotions-properly are common male toxic descriptions and are linked to male interaction with females and how it affects females.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 03:02 PM
1

Boys are socialized to behave more like girls. For example boys have a real physiological greater need for physical activity then girls to get their hormone balance to levels that allows them to concentrate in school. The common solution to dealing with boys that have not had enough physical activity is to give them drugs, detention, lower marks, ...
/r/MensRights20/11/18 11:37 PM
9

It criticizes the idea that all male behaviour is toxic and all female behaviour is innocent.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 09:57 PM
1

I watched the first couple of minutes of the linked video. It was a string of meaningless buz-words. How is this video related to girls play?
/r/MensRights20/11/18 08:14 PM
24

Reminds me of a boy's birthday party where about a dozen boys just ran around an empty room screaming and running into each other and the walls. One woman observing described it as chaos. No one was hurt and everyone had a good time.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 01:44 PM
3

Something that I've found that circumcised men can relate to. Gently brush the back of your hand. Your simulating pain nerve endings that are left over after circumcision. For some the remaining nerves react strongly causing pain for others they are numb. Gently brush the palm of your hand. Your stimulating tickle nerve endings which is one of the types of nerve endings that exists in the foreskin in high concentrations.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 03:54 PM
7

Do you have any solid reasons or evidence to think he does not deserve a spot on the supreme court?
/r/MensRights17/11/18 03:36 AM
0

Very long article and not directly related to men's rights. It does however cover metoo, sex, relationships, and loneliness which are big men's issues. This article is an interesting read.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 03:08 AM
3

So this subreddit is being labeled as "far-right reactionaries ... concern trolling and bad faith arguments". People will visit this subreddit and others on the list to see what the controversy is all about. I'm not sure if this helps or hurts this subreddit but it does result in more viewers.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 04:21 PM
1

When I first read the title I saw the words "The Stockholm Times" and thought well that makes sense.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 10:32 PM
3

meatal stenosis. Narrowing of the urethral opening. Common among circumcised men. erectile dysfunction more likely need for sex lube due to loss of flexible skin Gently brush the back of your hand. Your stimulating pain nerve endings left over after circumcision. For some they react strongly causing pain for others they are numb. Gently brush the palm of your hand. Your stimulating tickle nerve endings which is one of the types of nerve endings that exists in the foreskin in high concentrations.…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 08:50 PM
4

Most people do state banning circumcision for non-medical reasons. Having said that the medical reasons for it are very rare. Phimosis can't really be properly diagnosed until late puberty so putting a cut off age at 18 is cutting it close. It affects less then 1% of adult males and can be treated with stretching and steroid creams. For those really rare cases where steroids do not work then a cut can be done on the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal is required. https://www.n…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 08:37 PM
3

It is a refined surgical procedure that has made life easier for the person performing the procedure. Even with this refinement things still go wrong a lot. https://i.redd.it/zjh4fl926pd11.png
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:43 AM
3

So do I.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:26 AM
5

For the African HIV circumcision these links can help. Know there are better links out there but can't find them right now. https://malawi24.com/2015/07/25/malawian-circumcised-men-most-likely-to-be-infected-by-hiv-research-shows/ http://www.pmldaily.com/news/2018/10/museveni-castigates-circumcision-as-away-to-prevent-hiv-aids.html As for the sensation argument I usually state the following. Gently brush the back of your hand. Your stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings left…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:14 AM
5

Possibly. When my nephew was born my mother asked me my thoughts on circumcising him. She thought it was a good idea. Didn't know very much about the procedure at the time but still told her it was a stupid thing to do. Think that she passed on my opinion to the parents. Don't know if either of our opinions changed the final outcome but he is intact today.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 03:58 AM
3

This is the African circumcision HIV studies again. These studies were very poorly done. First the studies found that circumcised risk went from something like 3% to 2%. They then claimed a huge benefit of 60% risk reduction. The circumcised men could not have sex for 6-8 weeks while they healed from the surgery and were around condom information. Either of these factors could account for the reduction in risk.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 05:51 PM
2

Again read before you respond. Conclusion: Women with uncircumcised current partners are not at increased risk for BV.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 05:31 PM
2

verified results of circumcision reducing hiv transmission That is a big claim. What evidence do you have to support it?
/r/MensRights08/11/18 05:20 PM
3

Learn to read before you respond. BV is associated with increased risk of amniotic infection and preterm delivery, postoperative infections, and has been recently implicated as a potential cofactor in HIV transmission.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 05:11 PM
2

Very clever edit to your post. Seams the original much longer version which I responded to is gone.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 02:58 AM
2

He is saying that telling people to have protected sex dropped the HIV rate from 18% to 6%. Then the rumor spread that circumcision fully prevents the spread of hiv and the rate went up to now 7.3%. So which is better telling people to have protected sex or spreading the theory that there is a link between HIV and circumcision? Perhaps you need stronger evidence. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51362111_Bacterial_vaginosis_is_not_associated_with_circumcision_status_of_the_current_male_p…
/r/MensRights08/11/18 02:25 AM
1

He said this has confused the masses, “before we started this campaign the HIV prevalence was at 18% then it dropped to 6% but when they started this talk of circumcision it confused the masses then it went up to now 7.3%, there is much laxity among the members of the public and that’s why we need to fast-track the awareness so that by 2030 there is no virus in Uganda.” http://www.pmldaily.com/news/2018/10/museveni-castigates-circumcision-as-away-to-prevent-hiv-aids.html
/r/MensRights08/11/18 01:52 AM
8

The study you linked does not mention how many of those intact infants that got a UTI had their foreskins forcefully retracted. This would allow for the opportunity for "periurethral bacterial colonization" to happen beneath the foreskin at a time when it is most at risk of going wrong. Do not retract foreskins to wash under them! It only causes problems. The foreskin will release on it's own as the infant matures.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 08:54 PM
2

My guess is that Project Veritas Action had a big role to play in this outcome. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Doh0d78lin4
/r/MensRights07/11/18 02:31 PM
7

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12576863 CONCLUSION: Topical steroids are becoming the standard conservative measure for treating phimosis. Our study supports this trend, with an overall efficacy of 87%.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 02:42 PM
1

Well I can't think of a situation where someone is medical better off circumcised. The two suggestions you made when looked at more closely suggest that they are not better off medically. If such cases actually exist they are exceedingly rare.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 03:53 AM
11

foreskin can't be retracted properly This is called phimosis and can't be diagnosed until late puberty and affects less then 1% of males. There are stretching exercises and steroid creams that can be used as treatment and work about 87% of the time. In the cases where this method fails a cut can be made in the ridged band to allow the glans out. No tissue removal is required. resolve recurring infections Circumcision does not prevent infections. The surgery can cause it's own infections. Meatal …
/r/MensRights05/11/18 03:38 AM
8

Please name one.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 02:52 AM
12

The sad thing is that there are circumcised men out there that will claim that circumcision cannot lead to a bad sex life. For those men follow this simple experiment. Gently brush the back of your hand. Your stimulating pain nerve endings left over after circumcision. These leftover nerve endings either react strongly causing intense pain or go numb resulting in little to no sensation. Now brush the palm of your hand. Your stimulating tickle nerve endings which is one of the types of nerve endi…
/r/MensRights05/11/18 01:44 AM
6

They are stating the "earning gap" across all of UK and all age groups. They are then confusing earning with pay by saying... That's him getting a free lunch that I have to pay for, every day. The men are putting in the work to earn a little better meal every day. It is kind of good since men on average need to consume more calories per day due to physical size differences. It is more likely though that the higher earning is being given to wives and children. I've read that in the UK women are e…
/r/MensRights01/11/18 01:02 PM
4

Looks like they got your attention. Good start.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 04:05 PM
0

Are you even aware that the only evidence you provided to support your position supported my assertion on a lack of HPV vaccine consensus? The rest was meaningless attempts at insults. You really should read the comment section of the article you posted, not everyone is so easily fooled.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:08 PM
0

This discussion thread had nothing to do with the polio vaccine. That is a whole different discussion.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:07 PM
-1

NPC? LOL
/r/MensRights25/10/18 04:02 AM
2

Have listened to half of the second interview. Hearing the male interviewers talk is like listening to recovering male feminists.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 09:58 PM
0

My claim is that there is no global scientific consensus on this vaccine. The article you linked ridicules the Japaneses scientific community almost to the point of throwing insults. The article supports my basic claim that there is no global consensus. Japan’s health ministry, using specious and retracted claims of neurological damage along with using the worst statistical analysis I’ve seen from a public health body, did withdraw recommendation of the vaccine.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 04:49 PM
-1

I'll respond to this with "science, facts and logic" that you want. There is no global scientific consensus on this vaccine. India http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-06-controversial-vaccine-trial-india.html The trial, which has now been halted and is the subject of an investigation France https://therefusers.com/french-official-study-group-on-vaccination-proposes-removing-aluminum-from-vaccines-and-investigating-gardasil-safety-and-efficacy/#.VmtVoUorKM8 French official study group on vaccinati…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 04:18 PM
-5

So the answer is that your not going to provide "science, facts and logic" to the viewers here. At one time the scientific consensus was that the world was flat.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:22 PM
-5

Stick with science, facts and logic instead Are you ever going to provide these things to the people here to support your pro-vaccine position?
/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:47 AM
1

Yeah except for the fact that the vaccine and circumcision topics involve children they are very different topics.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:46 AM
1

foreskin contains Langerhans' cells with HIV receptors This is speculation since HIV is extremely hard to isolate from a lot of other protein tissue. You can't really put the clean virus and Langerhans' cells together to see what happens. can’t be 100% sure on the internet That is why it is good to do your own thought experiments. What presents the higher risk of transmission, torn tissue that allows access to the blood stream or foreskin tissue that has natural cleaning properties like smegma? …
/r/MensRights22/10/18 02:19 PM
6

less chances of contracting HIV when they are circumcised because the virus load does not remain in the foreskin This is speculation that HIV circumcision correlation studies like to say. There is no evidence to support it. foreskin that may have torn during the friction of sex Circumcision increases skin tension because there is less skin. Higher skin tension means greater chance of tearing. Painful and/or bleeding erections are considered to result from circumcision doctors removing far too mu…
/r/MensRights22/10/18 03:50 AM
1

r/Intactivists/ would be interested.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 02:14 AM
4

The foreskin allows skin movement which acts like natural lubricant. Regions that have high circumcision rates tend to have higher sex lube sales.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 01:38 AM
1

Phimosis is a condition that cannot be properly diagnosed until late puberty. The foreskin may not fully release until then. Common treatments are stretching exercises. Many men doing foreskin restoration use stretching. There is a steroid cream that can help with the stretching. As a last resort a cut in the ridged band can be done to allow the glans an opening large enough to come out. No tissue removal is required. Circumcision fixes phimosis as a sledgehammer is to tapping in a finishing nai…
/r/MensRights05/10/18 06:13 PM
2

Very good article. Had not heard about the Hematoma complication before but it make logical sense. Consider posting this to /r/Intactivists/ as well.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 12:48 PM
5

There are medical conditions that are alleviated by male circumcision. Can you give examples of types of conditions? higher resistance to certain STDs What evidence do you have for this?
/r/MensRights05/10/18 02:48 AM
14

The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STD's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STD's.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:56 PM
53

Watched the first person interviewed. She has convinced me that campus-rape-culture-hysteria is a real thing.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:56 AM
4

don't want to put in the work to keep them clean ... We take the extra step to do that with our girls, shouldn't the same effort be applied to the boy? The foreskin is fused to the glans at birth in a similar manner to nails being fused to fingers and toes. It releases in early or late puberty. While fused nothing gets in there and no extra work is required to keep it clean. Forced premature foreskin retraction can result in urinary tract infections in young males.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 11:04 PM
1

You used the term "rapidly heading toward zero" and didn't include any supporting evidence. Why do you keep ignoring evidence that disagrees with your point of view?
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:39 PM
1

we're already seeing signs that the rate of cervical cancer among the vaccinated age group is rapidly headed towards zero. The rate was heading toward zero before the vaccine program was introduced in Australia. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jo/2016/3056407/ Discussion In Australia over the last decade there has been a decline in the incidence of low-grade squamous dysplasia across all age groups, particularly noticeable in women aged 20 to 24 years. This change predated introduction of the n…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 12:57 PM
61

It looks like this girl is doing acid attacks against men. "This solution is 30 times more concentrated than the mixture used by housewives when doing the laundry," she claims in the video, per The Sun. "It eats colours in the fabric in a matter of minutes — leaving indelible stains."
/r/MensRights26/09/18 01:00 AM
2

The urinary track infection risk decrease is very small. You can still get an infection. Penile cancer is so rare that the cancer society has asked people to stop quoting that statistic. It is estimated that you would have to do several hundred circumcisions (200-500+ don't recall the number right now) to prevent one instance of penile cancer. If your at risk of getting cancer it would just happen somewhere else on the body.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 08:53 PM
3

If the chance of urinary tract infection was the concern then you should know the following. Urinary tract infections are minor, easily treated, and more common in girls then boys. It is estimated that at least 100 circumcisions would be needed to prevent 1 instance of urinary tract infection. Of course the risk of surgical related infection can be removed by not doing the circumcision.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 08:39 PM
4

This is like asking "Why do people make a big deal out of female circumcision?". It has had an impact on your life even if your not aware if it and understanding how means you can understand yourself better. Here is a brief start at this understanding. Gently brush the back of your hand. Your stimulating pain nerve endings that are left over after male circumcision. Sometimes the left over nerve endings react strongly causing pain and sometimes they go numb. Gently brush the palm of your hand. Y…
/r/MensRights13/09/18 08:02 PM
2

The majority of colour blind people are male but I do know a colour blind female so it is not exclusively a male issue.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 01:26 PM
6

The site has put all of the javascript and style sheet code in the same file. Putting external links to .js and .css files helps with performance(browser caching) and SEO (search engines focus on content). duckduckgo.com puts dvaa.org 1st, DVAA.com.au 2nd, and dvaa.net.au is listed in 10th place.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 01:00 PM
7

This is a good article. I do have issues with the following line. For the most part, female circumcision in its various forms are prone to more complications, The article you linked in this line shows that the amount of complications is a very debatable point and there is no getting around that.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 12:02 PM
5

There is a lot of good information here. https://www.bloodstainedmen.com/resources
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:17 AM
9

This is speculation and nobody seams to have any supporting evidence. Any link between circumcision and HIV was based on such poorly done studies that there is really no supporting evidence of a link there either.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 11:22 PM
1

My understanding is that when a queen was ruling the king tended to take care of domestic issues while she took care of foreign issues. When a king was ruling the queen did nothing meaning he had to take care of both foreign and domestic issues leaving less time for waging war.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 12:59 PM
1

In the early 1900's the gender balance in universities/colleges was about equal even though the total numbers were small. When WW1 happened the men disappeared for a while. Those that survived were given a big pay day and many of them decided to use that money for education. For a while there were many more men in university/college then women. The same thing happened around WW2. The gender balance was regained by the early 1980's. Since then the gender balance has been going increasingly toward…
/r/MensRights26/07/18 01:25 PM
1

https://www.regret.ie/
/r/MensRights24/07/18 04:49 PM
1

https://www.regret.ie/
/r/MensRights24/07/18 04:35 PM
1

Simon Harris says proposal will be given priority if approved by final health body report Here is a recent UK report and some quotes from it. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/726319/JCVI_Statement_on_HPV_vaccination_2018.pdf 32 Under the standard economic methodology, the findings of the modelling work by Warwick University predict that extending the HPV programme to adolescent boys would not be a cost-effective use of health service…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 01:47 PM
9

All the the issues you have listed are either serious medical situations that need to be addressed or are horrible events that are completely unintentional. Circumcision is intentional and unnecessary and as such is not comparable your list. 3.6% of children are readmitted to hospital following tonsillectomy, mainly because of dehydration or bleeding Do you really think that the rate of dehydration or bleeding problems caused by tonsillectomy could be that different from what is caused by circum…
/r/MensRights21/07/18 05:22 PM
4

acted out roles of femininity to achieve a false sense of empowerment. It is likely the "acted out roles of femininity" resulted in more tips which is a very real measure of power.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:55 PM
2

Many men come to this forum to rant. It is ok. There is a subreddit dedicated to this though /r/MensRants/
/r/MensRights18/07/18 06:21 PM
0

Here is what the report actually says. 32 Under the standard economic methodology, the findings of the modelling work by Warwick University predict that extending the HPV programme to adolescent boys would not be a cost-effective use of health service resources in the UK setting. Increasing the attributable fraction of HPV for oropharyngeal cancer does not alter this conclusion. On consideration of these results JCVI is not able to advise extension of the programme to adolescent boys. 34 If cons…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 04:03 PM
3

34 If considering a cost-effectiveness analysis where a combined girls’ and boys’ programme is compared to no vaccination, gender-neutral HPV vaccination is highly likely to be cost-effective. In a very weird way this says that gender-neutral vaccination would be more cost effective then no vaccinations for anybody. 32 Under the standard economic methodology, the findings of the modelling work by Warwick University predict that extending the HPV programme to adolescent boys would not be a cost-e…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 03:53 PM
3

So your tradition says that in the case of infant circumcision parents can enforce their will on male bodies but not on female bodies and there is nothing wrong with that traditionally enforced sexism. Interesting perspective.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 07:17 PM
6

So does that make the tradition sexist?
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:05 PM
7

I'm guessing that you think if it is a boy then parents have the authority to enforce their will on their sons body and if it is a girl then they do not have that authority. Seams like a sexist attitude to me.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 12:37 PM
7

Infant circumcision is a tradition of enforcing will on another person's body. So which is it tradition is good or forcing your will on another person's body is bad?
/r/MensRights17/07/18 02:32 AM
1

Child vaccination as early in the teens as possible is the preferred standard, before the risk of exposure occurs. Once infected the vaccine is useless. new research has found that you don't necessarily have to have sex to get HPV. The study, which was published in the journal Sexual Health, analyzed 51 studies conducted on HPV. Among the findings, researchers discovered that HPV can be found in the genital tract of up to 51 percent of female virgins. I read this as it is useless to give the vac…
/r/MensRights17/07/18 01:21 AM
5

You shouldn't take my word for it. You should take the time to find out for yourself that the Mayo Clinic is lying to you. Here is something to get you started. Lie 1 Easier hygiene. If hygiene were really a issue then why is it not a worry for female hygiene? Lie 2 Decreased risk of urinary tract infections. If there is really a decreased risk it would be small enough that you would have to circumcise a lot of men to prevent one instance. In the mean time those men would have the risk of surgic…
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:50 PM
4

Lie 1 studies conducted in South Africa, Kenya and Uganda which indicate that male circumcision may reduce the risk of HIV acquisition by up to 60% The studies indicate that a year after adult men were circumcised they were less likely to test positive for HIV. Of course these men could not have sex for 6-8 weeks or longer while they healed and they were around medical clinics which would have condom information. Lie 2 adult men are also making the cut for aesthetic reasons See lie 1,3,4,5 and 6…
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:33 PM
3

This article has so many known lies that the few parts where I'm not sure if they are lies I just assume are lies.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 11:59 AM
0

Circumcision supporters willfully ignore non-damaging resolutions to phimosis so they should be mentioned when the topic comes up.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 12:58 PM
4

Stretching, Steroid cremes, and a small cut in the ridged band are all treatments that do not require removal of any tissue and can have zero damage as opposed to circumcision which does a lot of damage.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 05:31 PM
4

Circumcision is a fix for phimosis as a sledge hammer is to tapping in a finishing nail.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:08 PM
14

Have gone through the PDF. page 3 Methodology The major issue with the survey was a low response rate and the actual responses showed a fair amount of bias in who responded versus those who did not respond. Specifically, males and faculty at the assistant professor level were severely underrepresented. So the lower paid males are severely underrepresented in this survey. page 6 The distribution of salaries as at July 1, 2017 for males and females is shown in Figure 3. As can be seen, the average…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 12:51 PM
13

First you must understand the difference between pay gap and earnings gap. Pay gap implies discrimination while earnings gap implies merit. Most people confuse these. The oldest debunking that I'm aware of. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUpgoayBPJc Warren Farrell has done extensive research into this topic. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=warren+farrell+why+men+earn+more&t=h_&ia=web Apparently UK statistics show that for those in their 20's to late 30's women are earning more then men. You'll have t…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:41 PM
18

Not to mention women are lower risk for causing property damage or starting bar fights. While they may be less likely to be in the physical fight they are often somehow involved in starting them. Can’t tell you how many pub bathrooms I’ve went into where everything was broken in the men’s. This has been discussed here in the past and janitors generally agreed that cleaning up the "ladies" room is the same or worse then cleaning up the men's room. pay gap might be shit on a lot of levels but a 13…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:59 PM
3

The following discussion threads went more in depth on this topic. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:52 PM
6

I'm going to put the formal studies aside and give you a simple experiment you can do for yourself. Gently brush the back of your hand. Your stimulating pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings left over after circumcision. Gently brush the palm of your hand. Your stimulating tickle nerve endings which is one of the nerve ending types that exists in the foreskin in high concentrations. Now what do you think, would sexual pleasure be reduced after those tickle nerve endings have been remov…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 01:56 PM
3

There is a massive push going on to inject boys with the HPV vaccine in the UK. If there were any evidence that there was a push to improve the lives of men in other areas of the UK it might be believable as an altruistic cause. Follow-the-money which would be going from the tax payer to the vaccine industry. Independent verification of the 'new cost effectiveness numbers' is needed as the vaccine industry has a conflict of interest in providing these numbers.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 04:39 PM
22

Arguments with feminists are useful if there is someone else watching. The observer can judge the merits of the debate for themselves.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:07 PM
2

Who is paying the teachers to teach the provably false gender narrative?
/r/MensRights07/06/18 01:21 PM
1

This is a very good question. How is this false narrative surviving in the face of such obvious evidence to the contrary. To be able to keep this narrative going for a long as it has logic dictates that it would have to be someone or a group of someones with a lot of power, resources, and money. Another possibility is that it is just human nature to behave this way which. I think it is a combination of both.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:45 AM
5

The article is about who gets the vaccine paid for by the tax payer. Everyone has access but some people have to pay for it themselves. There is confusion on this point and much of the confusion comes from the way the article is worded.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 05:19 PM
1

I'm commenting on the overall tone of all the comments here. Don't have anything specific to say about your comment.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 01:17 AM
1

Is this what a troll convention looks like or is everyone being serious? I can't tell. LOL
/r/MensRights31/05/18 12:43 AM
1

OK so that is a start. Now what is the point of your post? Edit: Women in the US have less motivation to enter politics then in Saudi Arabia because their interests are already being served. Western education is strongly biased in favor of women and your saying it is even worse in Saudi Arabia. Saying that the 1960's female homicide rate is lower tells me nothing because you have not included the total homicide rates or the current rates.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 01:21 PM
1

So no supporting evidence, just your personal belief.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 12:46 PM
1

Are you going to provide an answer based on statistic or just let people pointlessly theorize?
/r/MensRights30/05/18 11:48 AM
1

The OP's article was about free vaccinations being only offered to girls. Not that boys don't have any access. obliged to get the vaccine Looks to me like you want to take away rights for people to chose for themselves.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 08:12 PM
1

There is much more going on here then has been released to the public. Money Laundering In Canadian Politics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZluk_QgyqI
/r/MensRights28/05/18 05:44 PM
12

Easier hygiene If hygiene is not a problem for girls why would it be a problem for boys? Decreased risk of urinary tract infections Circumcision allows the possibility of surgical caused infection and a high chance of meatal stenosis which is a narrowing of the urethra. Decreased risk of sexually transmitted infections The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STI's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STI's. Prevention of penile problems ... phimosi…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 05:19 PM
3

True adverse events get reported to the FDA and the manufacturer (so Merck in this case) Let see what Merck puts in the with the HPV vaccine insert. http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil_9/gardasil_9_pi.pdf Page 7 Serious adverse events were collected throughout the entire study period (range one month to 48 months post-last dose) for the seven clinical studies for GARDASIL9. Out of the 15,705 individuals who were administered GARDASIL9 and had safety follow-up, 354 reported a…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 03:51 PM
2

I'm surprised at the up votes on this. Does this mean that people think the politician being sued has the most to gain, or the cancer charity that may or may not gain in the future? What I see in the here and now is the highly influential vaccine industry who could double their customer base at the expense of the tax payer having the most to gain.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 12:03 PM
1

No medicine is perfectly effective and all medicines have side effects. The vaccine industry has a sketchy history in this regard. To force everyone to take something regardless of the current medical condition directly contradicts the do not harm medical principal.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 12:02 PM
0

No medicine is perfectly effective and all medicines have side effects. The vaccine industry has a sketchy history in this regard. To force everyone to take something regardless of the current medical condition directly contradicts the do not harm medical principal.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 12:02 PM
3

It has gotten to the point where if someone identifies themselves as an NDP party member I assume they are a feminist. The higher up in the NDP party structure they go the more hard core feminist they seam to be.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 03:15 AM
5

Clarification, were you "required" or was it heavily suggested that you should have it?
/r/MensRights28/05/18 03:06 AM
21

The British government, legal system, and main stream media has been anti-male for a long time. Just ask the "Justice for Men and Boys" party in the UK. Now on this one issue the main stream and legal system is suddenly invoking "In the name of gender equality we should do something for men". If they were doing it on many issues it might be believable but invoking it on only one issue while continuing to deny other male issues. Something in this is rotten and I would start with the old line "fol…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 02:55 AM
3

Just part of the ongoing never ending insult directed at men that when it comes to sex men somehow lose understanding of basic yes no communication. Massive amounts of time, energy, and money are put into spreading this 'no means no' insult to as many people as possible in as many various forms as possible.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:41 PM
4

I created the following discussion threads at a time that I had decided to directly challenge my own emotions surrounding circumcision. https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/ Do not know if this is related but before I knew anything about circumcision or that I was circumcised I had adverse reactions to medical environments. Still do but it is less intense now. Being in a doctors of…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 02:15 AM
6

Looks to me like you were having a conversation with a troll.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 12:29 PM
2

I think many men recognize that this kind of power play goes on. It can be a game for females where the only way for a male to win is not to play. This kind of stuff creates MGTOW.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:52 PM
17

women have actually walked in on their boss naked or had a prof ram his penis down their throat These people are confusing porn plots with reality. LOL
/r/MensRights18/05/18 05:20 PM
12

has an education as a neurologist Guessing she did not learn anything about neurological development in infants otherwise she would not have had her sons circumcised.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 12:03 PM
1

http://www.domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/ There are sources at the bottom of the page under "Full References for PASK Manuscripts". Lifetime rates higher among women than men Past year rates somewhat higher among men It is not generally easy to find good data on IPV. The difference between lifetime and one year rates was discovered about 5 years ago by looking at raw data from Canada or the US. Don't recall which. When the raw data suggested that…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:29 PM
1

I have not done a lot of research into domestic violence but the people running this site have. https://honest-ribbon.org/
/r/MensRights07/05/18 03:52 PM
1

The term doing something is very open ended. Another example is a male family member had gotten caught up in family drama. We could have sat down to talk but instead we went for a day long bicycle ride. By the end we were tired and in a much better place then if we had tried to talk it out which likely would have ended up with more insults being thrown around. Tom Golden talks about this a lot. http://webhealing.com/blog/ http://menaregood.com/wordpress/ He does an excellent job of explaining it…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 01:56 PM
3

men are not encouraged to talk about how they feel This is one of the most basic misunderstandings on how the genders process emotions. Men get minimal benefit processing emotions by talking. They typically get much more benefit by doing things. For example the tradition gender roles at funerals. The women go off and talk or cry it out while the men are the pallbearers.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 01:00 PM
4

If I understand correctly this mans argument for circumcision is that while it does harm the infant it does no harm in the long term and to stop it would somehow harm the society that carries out the practice. I have to think that men who rationalize things like this are in need of healing because the alternative is deliberate malice and I don't want to think that.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 12:17 AM
2

https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jo/2016/3056407/ In Australia over the last decade there has been a decline in the incidence of low-grade squamous dysplasia across all age groups, particularly noticeable in women aged 20 to 24 years. This change predated introduction of the national vaccination program. The incidence of high-grade squamous dysplasia has also fallen in young women, with the fall in rate beginning well before any plausible effect from the vaccination program, but with slight but …
/r/MensRights30/04/18 08:58 PM
5

This opinion that men are sex obsessed is the basis behind the "no-means-no" line and the "don't be that guy" campaign. They are directed at men and have the basic assumption that when it comes to sex men loose basic communication and social skills.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 03:58 PM
2

Do you have counter information or is calling it bullshit the best you have?
/r/MensRights30/04/18 01:28 PM
3

but unfounded – concerns about its safety. Some of the concerns about it's safety. https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/merck-accused-of-fraud-deceit-and-negligence-in-us-gardasil-case/ If one country has concerns and another does promotion which country should you trust? https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/806645
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:06 AM
3

The goal of the threads is not to make people happy or angry with their existing body but to help them understand their body as it is.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:42 PM
7

Gently brush the back of your hand. Your stimulating pain nerve endings that are left over after circumcision. Gently brush the palm of your hand. Your stimulating tickle nerve endings which is one of the nerve ending types that exists in the foreskin in high concentrations. I don't know any different The following threads were made for people who don't think there is any way of knowing the difference. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 02:52 AM
5

There were a few different rewrites of Spider-Man. They were each given a different prefix such as amazing or fantastic. I'm guessing that Spider-Woman didn't have any rewrites so no prefixes.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 02:13 PM
1

I honestly can’t blame the women I saw that day in Las Vegas for going so nuts around those male strippers. They’re scorned for doing that in every other aspect of their lives. When they finally get a chance to break free, they go all out. Don't agree with this. Lines like "you go girl", "girl power", and "boys never hit a girl" encourage women to go all out nuts with no fear of consequences. edit: Women are only shamed and restricted if they are catering to male sexuality. Conversely, men still…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:01 AM
6

But I am 100% against attacks on Judaism and Islam. I am Jewish. Where has the OP or anyone in this thread anyone attacked religion?
/r/MensRights17/04/18 09:24 PM
7

This is only one part but something anyone can do. Brush the back of your hand. Your stimulating pain nerve endings that are left over after male circumcision. Brush the palm of your hand. Your stimulating tickle nerve endings which is one of the nerve ending types that exists in high concentrations in the foreskin. Circumcision sensation impact discussions. https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcis…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 02:28 AM
2

Yeah that makes sense, he short circuited.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:48 AM
3

I don't think it is a case of low intelligence. I think this is a case of denial and emotional attachment to his point of view on this topic.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:22 AM
6

Having nerve endings doesn't mean more pleasure Can you not tell the difference between pain nerve endings and pleasure nerve endings? The tickle nerve ending is only one type of nerve ending that exists in the foreskin and sexual arousal is way more complicated then any one element. How come every RCT done on circumcision has failed to show loss of sexual function? I don't know. Why is Viagara, Cialis, and sex lube sales so much higher in the US where circumcision is common compared to Europe i…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 11:02 PM
3

nonsourced intential lies and random anecdotal statements There were no sources in my post. There were no lies in my post and I don't think you were lying when you made your post either. You quoted the CDC "random anecdotal statements" so I countered with my own. Evidence for what is lost in terms of sensitivity. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6nJIVSYwqdA/UTK2EmHTzSI/AAAAAAAAA48/I2pqFwklStY/s1600/Sorrells-Chart.jpg Gently brush the back of your hand. These are pain nerve endings that you are stimulat…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 09:59 PM
5

arguments by intactivists is talking about the history of cirucmcision People talk about it because it is interesting to find out the history. Health benefits: ... dramatically reduce a man’s risk of acquiring HIV infection by 50 to 60 percent This is based on flawed African studies. They tested adult men for HIV, circumcised half of them, a year later the circumcised men that could not have sex for 6-8 weeks and were around condom information were less likely to have HIV. Apparently there were …
/r/MensRights07/04/18 09:13 PM
0

From what I have read some countries were shipping flawed metal to the US resulting in weakened equipment and structures. Tariffs were placed on those countries shipping flawed metal.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:40 PM
1

Show me evidence that what I have posted is wrong otherwise "blind believer alert". LOL
/r/MensRights03/04/18 07:00 PM
1

This information is out of date. At some point they decided there were more then three types to worry about so they created something that is suppose to cover 9 different types with one or two being wart specific. In order to cover more types they increased the amount of the adjuvant. The more potent the adjuvant the greater potential for problems.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 02:47 AM
2

Paul Younger, 53 Nobody in that age group male or female got the vaccine. I have yet to see scientific evidence posted that the vaccine might have prevented his current condition if it did exist when he was younger.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 03:13 PM
-7

Boys are not given the vaccine, even though the virus is known to cause cancers of the head and neck in men in later life. The vaccine manufacturer claimed a limited duration of effectiveness. The duration is short enough (9.4 years) that giving it to anyone too young will only delay the age that cancers happens. A vaccine that could prevent HPV infections was developed For the vaccine supporters please post a link to scientific evidence that the vaccine has actually been impacting the HPV infec…
/r/MensRights31/03/18 03:27 PM
40

Telling women what they can and can't do with their bodies is considered wrong so they can't ban prostitution. Telling men that their sex drive is wrong and should be penalized is standard feminist propaganda. For example the "no means no" propaganda which implies that men lose basic communication skills when it comes to sex. My understanding is that these punish the purchaser policies directly result in safety problems for both provider and purchaser.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 02:20 PM
1

So it should be trivial for you to provide a link.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 01:42 AM
1

HPV was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced. How much the vaccine impacted that decline is up for debate.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 01:41 AM
1

I'm not talking about how prevalent the disease is. I'm talking about evidence that the vaccine is actually having an impact on infection rates.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 09:59 PM
1

Circumcised men can masturbate without lubrication but it is a lot better with lubrication.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 08:54 PM
1

I have yet to see data showing the vaccine has had anything more then a minor impact on the already declining HPV infection rates for women. Have seen no vaccine data for male infection rates. This is more of a vaccine company service announcement that you have made.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 08:43 PM
12

If this is due to a medical diagnosis of phimosis then it is NOT OK to do this now. Phimosis is when the foreskin is not allowing the glans(head) to come out. This is the normal situation for new born infants as the foreskin is fused to the glans in the same manner that finger nails are fused to your fingers. The foreskin and glans separate naturally during puberty and can happen a late as 18 years. If when your 18 and you have this problem there are remedies. Foreskin stretching exercises is th…
/r/MensRights24/03/18 02:10 PM
3

So I think what your saying is that this is a preemptive move to protect against potential legal suits by demonstrating that the only gaps that exist are earnings gaps. If that is what is happening then it is understandable why they are doing it.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 10:32 PM
21

Mixing up the words wage and earning. Canada has long struggled to tackle the wage gap, with the most recent numbers showing women on average earn 87 cents for every dollar made by a man. If they have been performing a wage gap then they have just admitted that they have been breaking the law by paying women less. If they are talking about a earnings gap then the only ways to fix that would be to restrict the male workers and/or force the female workers to do more.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:04 PM
12

Standards can always be put too high to be reached and this is describing a no win situation. Males can always decide not to play with women that plays this game.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 01:16 PM
4

WOW That is one hell of a story.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:14 AM
17

Just a little gender reversal on a comment in the article. This is not a newborn, but a boy girl who is almost a teenager. Nobody should force a child, beyond newborn, to mutilate their body via circumcision against their will.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 11:15 PM
10

Not that circumcision should happen to infants but they are lumping together the least invasive female circumcision type IV with the most invasive types and saying it is all the same. Even murder is classified into 1st degree and 2nd degree with different penalties for each type. Type IV female circumcision can be a pin prick or skin scraping and does not necessarily leave any physical evidence that anything even happened. As for the guillotine comment every country that does female circumcision…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 10:23 PM
12

I'm not sure which is more important in Peterson's overall comments. His defense of freedom of speech or his countering the false identity narrative. Both are helping people to make better lives for themselves.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 04:11 PM
11

There are African studies that make this claim. They tested adult men for aids, circumcised half of them, a year later the circumcised men that could not have sex for 6-8 weeks and were around condom information were less likely to have aids. The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STI's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STI's.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 04:39 PM
12

The effects are not immediately obvious but they exist. Gently brush the back of you hand. Your stimulating pain nerve endings that are left over after circumcision. Gently brush the palm of your hand. Your stimulating tickle nerve endings that exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. This is best example I can think of because it provides a first hand and immediate sample of the damage done and it applies regardless of your religious beliefs.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 03:31 PM
3

This video is on the "ABC Comedy" channel so I suppose it is meant to be funny but I think many people will view the contrived dialogue as real.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 01:50 PM
15

From what I have read they can't even figure out how many circumcisions resulted in death. I doubt there is reliable data on infection rates.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 01:17 PM
1

If 20 years of effectiveness actually existed I would have a lot less doubts as it would cover that high risk period, but it does not exist. Maybe 12 years exists but who knows. Well I don't think any more can come of further conversation. Good talking with you.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 02:42 AM
1

even the 4 we have at best a shaky level of confidence in Well you will have to take that up with Merck as they are the ones that declared 4 serious incidents out of 15,705 follow ups. No....most infections are cleared within 2 years though. Yes I stated that 90% of infections clear up on there own within 2 years. transformation time is closer to 6-7 years realistically. ... 11-12 (recommended age) So vaccinate an 11 year old. For 20 years effectiveness that infected 31 year old can get cancer a…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 11:47 PM
1

don't even know for sure that any SAEs were caused Started out at 4 determined vaccine related events. I conceded down to 2 to acknowledge that 2 of the event types might not be considered that serious. Age at diagnosis is not what we care about - again breaking it into age ranges doesn't show anything relevant. ... (time of first sexual intercourse to about 30 or so) slashes the incidence for all age groups ... protective for 10-20 years This took some time to understand where you were coming f…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:02 PM
1

So using 2 / 15,705. That gives us 12.73 / 100,000 "serious adverse events". There may be more out of the 354 reported incidents that could not be determined to be vaccine related but were. So vaccinate 100,000 9-10 year olds, cause 12.73 problems for the chance to prevent 1.8 cervical cancer incidents when they are 20-24 years old. Vaccine effectiveness does wear off. There is debate as to how long the effectiveness lasts. There was once a claim of 9.4 years for effectiveness but there are clai…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:46 PM
2

1) We don't know the number of vaccines administered in the 7 clinical studies because they don't tell us. We can only know what happened to those 15,705 where there was follow up. There is no way of telling how many out of the 354 reported incidents could not be demonstrated to be vaccine related and yet were. Out of the 15,705 individuals who were administered GARDASIL9 and had safety follow-up, 354 reported a serious adverse event 2) Have you never seen someone suffering through headaches or …
/r/MensRights05/03/18 01:50 PM
0

The highest cervical cancer incidence risk group is the 30-39 year old group with a risk of 13.5/100,000. The incidence rate for 20-24 year old group is around 1.8/100,000. The Merk study had 4 serious incidents that were determined to be vaccine-related. 4/15,705 -> 25.47/100,000 25.47 is greater then 13.5 and much greater then 1.8. This is not difficult math. People have either hospitalized or suffer for years with these conditions "pyrexia, allergy to vaccine, asthmatic crisis, and headache".…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:32 AM
-5

The numbers show the risk of the vaccine causing serious problems is higher then the risk of getting the disease it is suppose to be preventing. Does it still make sense to you?
/r/MensRights05/03/18 12:14 AM
1

The documentation that Merk provides with the vaccine states otherwise. http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil_9/gardasil_9_pi.pdf Page 7 Serious adverse events were collected throughout the entire study period (range one month to 48 months post-last dose) for the seven clinical studies for GARDASIL9. Out of the 15,705 individuals who were administered GARDASIL9 and had safety follow-up, 354 reported a serious adverse event; representing 2.3% of the population. As a comparison,…
/r/MensRights04/03/18 11:58 PM
-6

Sorry your father is going through that. Have seen some evidence that tests could be developed for throat cancer but AFAIK nobody is working on it. Don't think I have heard anyone declare there is a cure for any type of cancer. Just a series of might be able to help you survive longer treatments. The best evidence I have seen for the vaccine being a preventative measure was not that strong. The following study suggests that the situation was improving for the the 20-24 year old age group before …
/r/MensRights04/03/18 11:25 PM
1

Yes but I have been unable to find statistics stating how common this type of cancer is.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 10:56 PM
-3

Penile cancer is very rare. Cervical cancer is more common and the highest at risk age group in Australia is 30-39 years where the cervical cancer incidence rate around 13.5/100,000. See figure 1 https://cervical-cancer.canceraustralia.gov.au/statistics The documentation that comes with the HPV vaccine states the chance of provable vaccine linked "serious adverse reactions" is about 4/15,705 -> 25.47/100,000 and these happen in the short term not some possible distant future. http://www.merck.co…
/r/MensRights04/03/18 10:23 PM
2

Do you have a link showing that this happened?
/r/MensRights04/03/18 10:23 PM
1

This "rule of thumb law" story is false. A judge in the 1780's speculated about using the whipping post as a form of punishment for women. It was a common form of punishment used on men at the time. A reporter overheard the comment and it became a running joke in the news papers for months. Some feminist in the 1880's found this joke, decided it was real and people have been believing it ever since. No such law has ever been found to actually exist. The origin of Rule of Thumb is not clear but i…
/r/MensRights03/03/18 12:01 AM
2

Women do make majority of the purchasing decisions. This kind of pricing will only increase that gap.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:10 PM
1

Almost correct. It changes the rules on paid leave for the "non-birthing parent" which is the father but in the name of inclusiveness the politicians can't really say father. They don't seam to have any trouble saying the word "woman" over and over, again and again.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 01:49 PM
3

Gently brush the back of your hand. These are pain nerve endings that are left over after male circumcision. Gently brush the palm of your hand. These are tickle nerve endings that exist in the foreskin in large quantities. The following discussion threads were created to increase understanding, even for those that have never known a foreskin. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights27/02/18 11:31 PM
1

The word "sons" was added in 1914 at the beginning of WWI, before there was much in the way of casualties. My guess is the addition of the word "sons" was originally a recruiting tactic and became a respect thing later.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:54 PM
1

My thoughts on this topic from a couple of weeks ago. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7v0ct4/canadian_politicians_push_legislation_to_remove/
/r/MensRights22/02/18 03:00 PM
2

See the "external links" in the side bar. The Reference book of Men's Issues in the side bar is good too.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:18 PM
3

Are you white? yes Are you male? yes Are you about to speak on something that involves the struggles of women, POC or other minoritized people? Was thinking about how the #metoo movement is negatively affecting good honest males. Think I just heard someone say Shut Up.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:19 PM
2

What evidence do you have supporting this claim? anti-vaccine movement is responsible for the first measles outbreak in the U.S. in years The article you have linked to talks about deaths linked to the HPV vaccine. It is very difficult to prove in real world situations that one event is the sole cause of another event as it is unlikely to be the sole cause. This is the same reason it is hard to prove that a vaccine actually prevented an incidence of cancer. The Gardasil HPV vaccine insert does s…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:03 PM
1

I started out by wondering why there was such a big push to give this HPV vaccine to children as they are an extremely low risk group. Have done research on this now and dug into some real numbers and am now beginning to wonder why the HPV vaccine is even a thing. Articles that promote it are basically fear mongering articles like the op posted. They talk about the possibility of a decade out preventing something bad. They never mention the vaccine insert that comes with the vaccine listing many…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:42 PM
1

The glans is sensitive to pain. Some circumcised men have pain around the scar while others have numbness. The pleasure nerve endings are gone and a small sample of what they should have felt like can be gotten by brushing the palm of your hand.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:09 AM
2

Interesting video. Two thing about it. 20,000 number is considered to be a low estimate not a up to 20,000 estimate. Many circumcised men complain about being too sensitive already. When the circumcision scar healed the pain nerve endings grew rapidly leaving high pain sensitivity. These men would likely reject this because they don't want more pain sensitivity.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:12 AM
1

The average male processes emotions differently from the average female. This is simply the way it is, in the same way that the average male is physically larger then the average female. There is overlap in individual methods but the gender difference is real. If there is a female side of boys to repress it is tiny for the simple reason that they are not girls. Boys have a male side that can be repressed. For example elementary school recess times being reduced to levels that are enough for girl…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:24 PM
1

express their feelings any way they choose so long as it doesn't bring harm to others Agreed, now if we can just get people to recognize that boys process emotions differently from girls and to stop pushing them to process emotions as if they were girls.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:49 PM
0

"boys don't cry" or "quit being a pussy" While boys can certainly cry it is less likely due to physical tear duct differences between the genders. It may also not be the best way for boys to process emotion. To say "quit being a pussy" is a call to action which is good because action is a good way for boys to process emotions. Action does NOT mean violence. Action can involve building, running, singing, jumping, cooking, or countless other activities.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:14 PM
3

Men are conditioned to reject anything feminine within themselves such as emotions I would say that men are criticized for not behaving in feminine ways. Males and females process emotions differently and when men process their emotions by doing things they get told they are doing it wrong because they are not talking it out the way females do. This is a lack of understanding on how male emotions work, not a rejection of some female component.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 05:13 PM
2

Here is what I had to say about this issue a couple of days ago. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7v0ct4/canadian_politicians_push_legislation_to_remove/
/r/MensRights06/02/18 12:51 AM
0

It was added at the beginning of WW1, not during. This makes it a recruiting tactic not a honour thing. It changed into an honour thing later.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 12:47 AM
1

With the exception of figures 2 and 3 the figures show no change in the pre-vaccine trend for the 20-24 age group. These are not my serious adverse events, they are Merck's events the creator of the vaccine. It is very difficult to prove without any doubt that a event is vaccine-related so there is likely more that just cannot be proven. Those events can also take up years of follow-up treatment and happen at greater rates then the disease it is suppose to be preventing. There is a lot more deta…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 02:33 PM
1

Looked through these graphs. Figure 2 and 3 suggest a positive impact of the HPV vaccination program. The other 7 figures show a continuation of the pre-vaccination trends which were already slowly dropping or moving sideways. https://cervical-cancer.canceraustralia.gov.au/statistics The long term Australia stats Figure 2 shows that the overall rates have been moving sideways since 2002. The vaccine program started in 2007. So here is what I see. Vaccinate 100,000 12 year old girls and possibly …
/r/MensRights30/01/18 10:48 PM
1

It not as though I chose Australia. Australia is the only country that seams to provide these statistics so working with what is available. Look at Figure 1 for the age specific incident rates. Not using the age standardized mortality rate as that includes all ages and was talking about young people only. How about using 0.5% HPV of infections turn into cancer after 7 years. 1.7/100,000 cancer incidents 20-24 years -> 340/100,000 infections at 13-17 years old. How about 0.1% of HPV infections tu…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 05:56 PM
1

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs380/en/ There are many types of HPV, and many do not cause problems. HPV infections usually clear up without any intervention within a few months after acquisition, and about 90% clear within 2 years. A small proportion of infections with certain types of HPV can persist and progress to cancer. http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats14/surv-2014-print.pdf page 41 Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States. Ov…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 03:09 PM
1

Regardless of how HPV transmission happens we agree it is common and that sexual transmission is likely the most common method. Transmission does not necessarily lead to infection. It has been my understanding that 90% of infections clear up on it's own before 2 years, 5% result in warts, and 5% result in cancer. https://cervical-cancer.canceraustralia.gov.au/statistics The Australian statistics don't really start counting the cervical cancer rate until 20-24 years and that number is somewhere a…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 03:48 AM
0

It is my understanding that HPV is actually common in our environment in the same way that yeast is common. Having HPV or yeast around you does not mean you will become infected. An infection causes a real change in tissue. Since genital warts and cervical cancer is almost non-existent in teenagers it is safe to conclude that actual tissue changing HPV infection is rare for that age. Looks like I didn't mention the Australian statistics last time. Australia seams to be the only country that make…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 11:05 PM
-2

lol fuck off So do you have some valid counter points? For example the documentation that comes with Gardasil lists the serious adverse effects rate at 2.5% for Gardasil and 2.3% for Garadsil 9. "The cervical cancer diagnosis rate in the US is 7.9/100,000". So according to the Gardasil documentation the risk of serious adverse effects from Gardasil is much higher then the risk of getting cervical cancer.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 06:31 PM
-4

If you get an HPV infection there is a 70% chance it will be gone in a year and a 90% chance it will be gone in 2 years. The remaining persistent infections can eventually turn into warts or cancer. The 5% persistent HPV infections can cause a very slow progressing form of cancer that is more treatable then most forms of cancer. There are pap smears that have a near 100% detection rate for women and have seen evidence that a similar throat swab can be developed for men. With detection that 95% c…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 02:18 PM
1

Serenity Prayer God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, Courage to change the things I can, and the Wisdom to know the difference.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 07:42 PM
1

Yes it can be difficult to recognize that simple thing that makes you happy. That moment can be easily overwhelmed by the negative that has been built up and be fleeting. It is not an easy task and if it were easy it would have little real value.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 02:58 PM
2

Find something simple that makes you happy. It could be a food that you enjoy or a park that you like to visit. Something that is for yourself. These simple momentary selfish moments can dispel a lot of life's pressures.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 01:20 PM
3

Done a search through some of my links and am not sure where the 20000 number originated from. That is why I use it as more of a 9000/20000 relative measure. The following links contain a lot of technical information on the prepuce. http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/boyle6/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=11&v=DD2yW7AaZFw
/r/MensRights21/01/18 05:52 PM
10

The 20,000 number is a low end estimate. Some say that it is much higher. It is really a way of giving a relative comparison between male and female prepuces. Common low end estimates put the female prepuce (clitoral hood) at 9000 nerve endings and the male prepuce (foreskin) at 20000. The difference in numbers is really due to the difference in size. While the foreskin represents almost all of the male pleasure tissue the clitoral hood is a small portion of the total female sensitive tissue.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 03:34 PM
5

Saw reporters in different cities asking marchers what specific message have you come to get across or have you seen others stating. The people being interviewed all agreed that the messages they were surrounded with were wonderful but could not really think of anything specific beyond "support women".
/r/MensRights21/01/18 12:50 AM
5

bringing the law down on immigrants and muslims As I already said it may actually be helping the men in those groups to "sort themselves out" on the circumcision issue. The same already happens for women coming from female circumcising cultures. causing more widespread health problems for men This seams to go back to the J4MB NHS position which I'm not familiar with. It might be a good discussion thread on it's own.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 05:31 PM
8

Nationalized Health Care and Corporate propaganda are only two factors in circumcision rates. Looks like you have a problem with J4MB position on NHS. This thread was about J4MB position on circumcision.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 05:16 PM
8

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_circumcision Percentage of mothers reporting having their male baby circumcised ... Canada, 2006/2007 31.9% That 31.9% number has dropped from where it was historically. Nationalized health care paying for the procedure is one of the motivations for getting the procedure done. In areas where the procedure is no longer subsidized by nationalized health care the rates are lower because those that are unsure don't pay for it. J4MB does more then just circ…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:52 PM
14

So should immigrants to the UK from regions in Africa that perform female circumcision based on religious beliefs be left alone? Canada also has socialized health care and money is a motivating factor there. There are people in the UK that privately perform circumcision and make a lot of money off of it. The only difference is the total amount of money in the practice is smaller in the UK then the US.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 03:46 PM
14

Did you really just say that circumcision has nothing to do with mens rights?
/r/MensRights13/01/18 03:26 PM
8

Physically it is a trade off. While men are usually bigger and physically stronger, women need less daily calories on average and tend to recover faster from illnesses such as the flue. Men are just as emotional as women, we just process emotions differently. Men often process emotions by doing something and being in a tough situation is the perfect time to do something. The lack of understanding of how men process emotions actually causes a lot of misunderstandings.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:40 PM
3

I have never sent a dick pic but the following reasoning makes sense to me. Women send sexy pictures to men, it is quite common. Womans magazines are filled with examples of what sexy female pictures are suppose to look like. There is a cosmetic industry catering toward this common female goal of looking sexy. There is a much smaller set of sexy picture examples for men. There is also a much wider range of things that can make a sexy male picture. It could be a skin exposed Fireman Calendar or a…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:17 PM
2

Think my original point is that it is about how the observers see things so you are agreeing with me that it is about them and not the person your debating. Well lets sit back and see what the voting observers think about our comments.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 08:41 PM
5

If all your doing is going on the offensive without supporting your position then you are loosing.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 07:07 PM
7

Yes I have which is why the debate is not about them, it is about the observers.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:12 PM
14

Mocking only works when the person your debating is not bringing up counter points. If the other person is making points and your just mocking them or throwing insults which person do you think the neutral observer will find more credible?
/r/MensRights07/01/18 03:17 PM
5

It is not pointless to debate feminists if there are others around that can read or hear the debate and judge the outcome for themselves. You should not be trying to change the mind of the feminist you should be trying the sway the mind of the neutral observer.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 02:35 PM
2

The cancer incidence rate difference could be due to environment. I've heard that when someone from a country with low cancer rate moves to a country with high cancer rate the cancer risk for that person rises proportionally.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 05:15 AM
114

Do not give pets as gifts unless you talk it over with the person receiving the gift. Pets given as gifts rarely work out as what your giving is a big responsibility. 8-9 weeks is the youngest that a puppy should be before it can leave it's mother. They can't even walk until about 6-7 weeks. I can forgive the article for now covering much about the man owner who lost their home as they probably have little to no information about them. It is good that the puppy has shelter, I hope that the man o…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 03:06 PM
3

There was one point in his talk where he says "I've had to take a real honest look at the ways that I've consciously been hurt ... uh ... that I've unconsciously been hurting the women in my life." Time 14:15 For one brief moment he was being honest with himself then he continues to consciously hurt himself with shame and guilt.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 02:46 PM
1

My comment and suggested reference materials were posted before she deleted her account on Dec 30th. No way to know what she is thinking now.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 02:00 PM
1

After reading a recent Feminist discussion thread here are the kind of things that they say. Picked only up voted comments. completely justified in opposing men's orgs; we can look into men's issues once patriarchy has been dismantled. Otherwise it's poor prioritization. women are socially, historically, and culturally oppressed, with laws and politics to back it up. Men should form their own health committees, it is not the responsibility of the underprivileged to support the privileged. It's n…
/r/MensRights01/01/18 02:18 PM
1

"It is worse for women" I have not noticed feminists promoting that line it has been suggested women are about twice as susceptible to PTSD
/r/MensRights31/12/17 11:24 PM
1

The thinking that rape is worse for women then it is for men is what Mary Koss was doing when she got the legal definition for rape to be penetration by the penis. The "it is worse" for women assumption is a major motivation for almost every Feminists bias and leads to hypersensitive women and guilt ridden men.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 02:00 PM
1

I focus on the individual level because I can't see a way to tackle Feminism as a whole entity. Every seed of doubt weakens the support base.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 10:48 PM
1

I think it is because most of them have a lifetime of propaganda lies/half-truths the radicals have been repeating to them with little to no contradictory information. It takes a lot of inner emotional work before false emotional driven beliefs can dissolve and not everyone is willing to do the work.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 10:28 PM
3

I don't agree with the line They will rightly see you as a troll and tell you to get lost. Caution is definitely called for but not an outright "get lost" as these people often believe they are in the right and are not trying to be trolls. Respond calmly and make sure others are around to judge the interaction for themselves.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 09:36 PM
5

These protesters are deliberately forward and often provocative, they have to be to be heard. They have very solid information. http://www.bloodstainedmen.com/ A gender balanced opinion on inter partner violence can be found here. https://honest-ribbon.org/
/r/MensRights29/12/17 08:04 PM
2

Some words from someone that has gone through the research stage of both the male and female sides of gender issues. Maybe these words will help you on your journey. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WMuzhQXJoY
/r/MensRights29/12/17 07:46 PM
1

Most feminists are "coffee shop" or "casual feminists" and are not aware of the actions of the Feminists with power and the things that they have done and do. Many of the greatest Mens Rights Supporters were Feminists that just needed to be shown some facts.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 07:11 PM
3

For a moment I though the song was going to make fun of the pay gap propaganda. No such luck though.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 04:22 AM
3

The highly insulting constant reminder that when it comes to sex that men and only men have to be constantly reminded about basic yes and no communication that even our cats and dogs fully understand.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 03:30 PM
1

:)
/r/MensRights22/12/17 02:25 AM
7

Just information. Circumcision scar tissue heals in one of two ways. Either the remaining pain nerve endings grow rapidly leaving intense pain sensitivity or die off leaving numbness. The sensation difference can be compared with seeing in colour or seeing in black(numbness) and white(pain). The following threads were created in an attempt to understand circumcision effects for those that have never known a foreskin. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/ htt…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:36 AM
1

Men are more likely to recede into certain types of games and women are more likely to recede into different types of games. Have you ever seen a man playing "Candy Crush Saga"?
/r/MensRights08/12/17 02:32 PM
5

The issues that mens right activists face go beyond the politics of any one country. The following list covers issues faced by men and can be applied unchanged to most developed countries. https://j4mb.org.uk/2015-general-election-manifesto/
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:31 AM
2

I think that a lot of people voted for Trump because they viewed him as the lesser of two evils.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:20 AM
5

Most circumcised men do not understand what has been lost. The following thread was created in an attempt to understand the loss even though there is little to nothing to compare it with. An emotional or curiosity driven point that comes up a lot with circumcision is the sensation. How does circumcision change the sensation? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:51 AM
25

At what age were you circumcised? I was three years old. It was done for medical reasons – I was diagnosed with Phimosis, a condition where the foreskin is too tight to be pulled back over the head of the penis. Phimosis cannot be diagnosed until late puberty. The foreskin is deigned to be fused to the glans(head) at birth in a similar manner to finger nails being fused to fingers and is there for protective reasons. Intact infant males that develop urinary tract infections have usually had the …
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:50 PM
1

It’s horny men who demand that the women in comic books, video games, and movies be beautiful, thereby contributing to the objectification and degradation of women. How does this explain magazines targeted at women that always have the most attractive looking female pictures in them? How does this explain the number one porn category searched for and watched by women is lesbian? Men still commit the majority of the sexual assaults in this world. That’s another cold, hard fact that can’t be denie…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:15 PM
8

People suffering from the personality trait disorder alexithymia have difficulty identifying and expressing their feelings. This preliminary study investigates what role early trauma might have in alexithymia acquisition for adults by controlling for male circumcision. Three hundred self-selected men were administered the Toronto Twenty-Item Alexithymia Scale checklist and a personal history questionnaire. The circumcised men had age-adjusted alexithymia scores 19.9 percent higher than the intac…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 05:21 PM
2

Erin Pizzey site dealing with domestic violence issues. https://honest-ribbon.org/ Honest-Ribbon.org, formerly known as WhiteRibbon.org, is owned by Erin Pizzey, hosted by A Voice for Men, and is not affiliated with any other White Ribbon organization.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:41 PM
10

practice mannequins are usually male torsos. Not in my case. Rescue Anne dolls were used in my CPR training and are common. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resusci_Anne
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:34 PM
1

Don't know what kruzesagt said but between low birth rates and high immigration rates it is a population replacement happening in developed countries. Immigration by the Numbers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muw22wTePqQ Immigration, World Poverty and Gumballs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
/r/MensRights27/11/17 02:54 PM
36

Economic considerations are definitely a contributing factor to declining birth rates. It is often said that where once one income could support a family it now takes two incomes.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 02:26 PM
2

Has anyone else noticed a rancid troll fart coming from this post?
/r/MensRights26/11/17 02:14 PM
6

Erin Pizzey site dealing with domestic violence issues. https://honest-ribbon.org/ Honest-Ribbon.org, formerly known as WhiteRibbon.org, is owned by Erin Pizzey, hosted by A Voice for Men, and is not affiliated with any other White Ribbon organization.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 12:57 PM
2

I received CPR training on an Anne doll with a female face and body. Is this really a rare thing for others?
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:34 AM
2

AFAIK this has been recognized as an issue with CPR for a very long time. That is part of the reason CPR training is often done on Resusci Anne dolls with a female figure and face. Anne dolls are what I received CPR training on.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 10:06 PM
2

Your response means to me that you were always of the mind set where your opinions could be changed based on new information. Many people cannot do this kind of thing until their false belief directly negatively impacts them. This puts you ahead of a great many people.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 04:36 PM
2

I recently challenged a woman on her using the metoo hash tag. She went over a couple of weeks from notme to posting articles that blamed men for workplace sexual misconduct to posting metoo and implying that male sexual behaviour should be policed better. There were a couple of feminists that defended her. The female feminists either dismissed my points or claimed I was wrong to make a challenge. The most vile and toxic insults came from a male feminist. He stated that he was not even trying to…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 02:22 PM
1

When the stereotype comes from a TV serial, major movie, or other corporate media created content it is not society that is imposing the standard it is the corporate media.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 03:00 PM
1

Added to my todo list. Will do a proper search later when I have a clear head.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 12:19 AM
1

The description provided was not mild. There is likely more then the vaccine going on but he claims that is when serious health problems started. Angioedema (hives under the skin) all over my body and would break out from basically any form of trauma on top of a severely weakened immune system that caused me to never be as energetic as I once was. ... legs and feet would balloon up. Just walking would do it, ... Exhausted and cloudy, going to class I have been going through pubmed.com but have n…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 11:27 PM
1

The story was provided to show that the side effects can be serious. Andioedema is one of the known side effects of the HPV vaccine. It was briefly mentioned in the CNN video starting at 1:40 in the earlier thread we participated in. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/19/opinions/how-to-prevent-hpv-bassett-opinion/index.html
/r/MensRights09/11/17 09:43 PM
1

I was not aware of this search option. It appears that duckduckgo has something similar.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 09:23 PM
1

I packed a few things into that brief comment. As for the effectiveness duration it appears to be longer then originally thought a few years ago. The reports only provide numbers on girls. At one time somebody found there might be a difference in effectiveness duration between the genders and that may still be the case. The linked reports do not mention side effects which can be serious and has an unknown frequency of occurrence. A male previously posted a reply to me stating that at 16 he recei…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 09:20 PM
3

These are the words of Diane M. Harper. She has been involved in the HPV vaccine testing since it's early development. If there is scientific literature specifically mentioning this I have been as yet unable to find it. It is likely that this information would hurt sales so it has been buried very deep. Have also found it difficult to find much specific information on vaccine side effects. Think it is much more likely that the motivation is due to money and not misandry.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:57 PM
7

There is so much disinformation surrounding both circumcision and the HPV vaccine. There is little to no evidence that circumcision protects against STD's. Studies that suggest there is are often found out to be false. The HPV vaccine may not be as safe and effective as it is marketed. The vaccine does have side effects which can be as debilitating as cancer and for 40% of boys there is evidence that the protective antibodies wear off after two years. There is even less evidence that all boys sh…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 01:38 PM
6

The Scientific American article references African studies on HIV. In these studies they tested adult men for HIV, circumcised half of them, then tested them for HIV a year later. The circumcised men that could not have sex for 6-8 weeks and were around medical clinics with condom information were less likely to have HIV one year later. The AAP article is a long one and the only benefit they mention is STI and cite the African HIV studies. As for other STI's American has some of the highest HIV,…
/r/MensRights08/11/17 07:45 PM
1

A reason not to give it to a younger person would be the side effects. If side effects are more likely to happen in someone before puberty when the HPV risk is very low then the risk benefit ration is at the worst it can ever be. We already know the HPV risk for children is low we just don't know the vaccine side effect risk at different ages.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 02:35 AM
2

Think that it is highly unlikely that anyone really knows the prevalence of HPV infection in men. If such a thing as a throat swab test existed and it were used routinely then there would be some real data to work with. There is a pap smear test that is used so there is actual data to work with when looking at the prevalence of HPV vaginal infection among women. I would not trust this 1 in 9 statistic.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 01:21 PM
6

Earl Silverman did good work in a political environment that wished he didn't exist. I only heard about him after his suicide and if he had been able to hold on to life a little longer he would have seen changes such as CAFE making real progress.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 01:48 PM
3

There are health risks and this main stream video is the first I have seen that actually admits this. The vaccine industry does an excellent job of obscuring the risks and exaggerating benefits. Whether the vaccine is used seams to come down to political decisions in each region.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 07:02 PM
2

This article while it is more honest then previous articles I have seen is still very concerning. The good. This is the first main stream article that I have ever seen that actually mentioned "oral HPV tests" or throat swabs even thought they mentioned that they don't exist. There are pap smears have a near 100% detection rate for HPV so development of a HPV throat swab test should be trivial. The video states that there can side effects and list some of them which is the first time I have seen …
/r/MensRights03/11/17 02:40 AM
6

This article tracks very well with what I have observed. A woman whom I have very minimal interactions with posted a notme stating she had not been harassed. She followed up days later with an article claiming that men don't have to be afraid of workplace interactions with women, they just have to stop sexually harassing them. She followed up days later with a metoo citing a previously forgotten incident and suggested we should be doing a better job of policing male behaviour. I called her out o…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 04:19 PM
3

The same thing was tried in Canada. It was stopped by many people submitting numerous anonymous rape reports accusing organizers of the list of sex offenses. The reports were obviously completely ridiculous and quite funny to read but there was the "listen and believe" chant going on which meant the registry had to take each accusation seriously.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 04:21 PM
57

Apparently Hugh Hefner started the Playboy magazine after his first wife cheated on him. He had been through the system and seen divorce first hand so it makes sense that an article about it was in the first edition.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 03:46 PM
3

It may be a long time before she will be able to hear what your saying. Just keep going and bring up real world examples when they happen but don't force it. Just comment then move on and eventually enough seeds may be planted. All Red Pills by definition are hard to accept and take time.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:43 AM
4

I know that many people believe that vaccines can only be beneficial and does no harm but that is just not reality. All medicines have side effects and no medicine is perfectly effective. So lets look at the cost benefit ratio of giving the vaccine to children and some risks of the disease itself. HPV risk. Australia is the only country that seams to keep any statistics on HPV rates and they only keep statistics on females. This could be due to the vaccine being first developed in that country. …
/r/MensRights15/10/17 02:44 PM
6

If you want to find something that might have a political slant to it then I suggest you use one of the following search engines. duckduckgo.com dogpile.com ask.com
/r/MensRights11/10/17 01:40 PM
19

But events in three cities open only to ‘women and black or ethnic minorities’ The native British birth rate is already below replacement levels and this kind of discrimination can only make it worse. Men that have incomes are more likely to actively start families and men that don't have incomes will not pro-actively start families.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 01:32 PM
2

The following threads were created in an attempt to understand what can't be remembered because it was never there. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/6itbgg/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights10/10/17 02:40 AM
3

negative consequences- but if there are then I'm not aware of any. I gave you one negative consequence. The missing tickle sensation that you can get a mild sample of from the palm of your hand. Edit: syntax
/r/MensRights09/10/17 11:03 PM
11

Brush the back of your hand. Your stimulating pain nerve ending and this is what remains in circumcised men. Brush the palm of your hand. Your stimulating tickle nerve endings. These exist in high concentrations in the foreskin. This is a partial example of what you are missing. Discussed in more detail here. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:32 PM
2

Wow that is harsh. Mike Buchanan often looks a little nervous and rough in presentation but he is more like a diamond in the rough. He has a strong base of facts and does get them out there. He has accomplished much more then most in this movement.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 12:51 PM
1

It is a certain type of woman that abuses her power that messes things up. For example do you think the many prominent women that are part of the MRM messes things up?
/r/MensRights02/10/17 01:55 AM
-2

Scouts Canada has been accepting women leaders and girls for decades now. It is still mainly a male organization. Don't think it has been a disaster for the organization. Think this because the rugged outdoors type activities actually repel the women that are too dainty or fragile and more likely to complain about things. These complaining female leaders that mess things up tend to end up in Girl Guides Canada which has has always had a strong no boys allowed attitude. It is not women being part…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 12:29 AM
3

The idea for an International Conference on Mens Issues(ICMI) happened after North American MRA's heard a conference had happened in India. During the last ICMI in Australia the Indian delegates described there support phone lines for men going through domestic violence and divorce. Have not heard of any similar support existing else where.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 03:45 PM
13

So the phrase "Woman hold up half the sky" was Chinese propaganda used at a time when they were trying to get women to behave more like men. Both genders were assigned the same jobs and wore the same clothing. The sexual repression was immense, sex education was basically banned. Today feminists use the phrase and attempt to get boys to behave more like girls. Interesting.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 03:33 PM
1

The article said that the expectation that men be the provider meant that the male teachers often had to work two or three jobs to be the provider and that made them less competent teachers then the female teachers that only had one job to focus on.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 05:01 PM
1

Bambi Meets Godzilla. Thanks for the memories, I enjoyed that short movie as a boy. It starts out as something that will be mind numbingly boring then takes a surprising plot twist that relieves the early tediousness.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:53 PM
4

As a "graphic designer" could you be a little specific in your criticisms. Just saying it is visually displeasing is not helpful.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 12:34 PM
1

LOL you can't even understand what I said. Well I suppose there is nothing more to say.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 09:15 PM
1

Your definition of MGTOW includes every male on the planet and therefore is meaningless. The term MGTOW was created because it was recognized that many men were exhibiting behaviour that does not follow the traditional roles. There is no perfect term to describe this behaviour yet. My understanding is that Japanese males that exhibit non-traditional behaviour are called grass eaters or herbivores in an attempt to make this behaviour insulting. I would think anyone that exhibits this behaviour wo…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 08:47 PM
3

The term MGTOW is not well defined or understood even by some experts. While some MGTOW do still date and hook up there is another definition that I'll let DoctorRandomercam describe. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gob8XA6qsHo
/r/MensRights04/09/17 06:33 PM
5

Today if a male has sex with a female and she gets pregnant the men are expected to support whatever decision the woman makes. That is the case even if the male does not know about the pregnancy, is proven not to be the father, or the woman committed statutory rape. Today is more like a "you touch it, you bought it" situation.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 06:24 PM
8

It seams to me that the Big Bang Theory is just a feminist view of the way they see the world of male behaviour. Cannot really blame the show for not reflecting reality as I can't think of any 1/2 hour sit com that did reflect reality.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 01:10 PM
28

This article seams a little backwards. It is claiming that men are the reason there is a low marriage rate. Women are much more likely to initiate divorce which contributes to the rate. If availability of sex has become so great for men then why does MGTOW exist where many men are avoiding sex and relationships. If anything high porn rates among men could be due to the lower risk involved. Claiming that "Fifty Shades of Grey" reflects how female sexuality and relationship behaviour has been shap…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 12:32 PM
8

Gently brush the back of your hand to stimulate pain nerve endings. These are the nerve endings that remain in the cut penis. Gently brush the palm of your hand to stimulate tickle nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. This is a partial example of what you and your son are missing. Discussed in more detail. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6itbi0/circumcision_sensation/
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:37 PM
6

I wonder what she would have to say about the economist Thomas Sowell speaking about pay and earnings gaps back in 1981. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUpgoayBPJc
/r/MensRights23/08/17 08:46 PM
1

The problem may come from the fact we don't really have a way of referring to adult males in the English language. There use to be wereman for adult males but that got dropped from the language so we default to the gender neutral terms like people because there is no other choice.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 04:30 PM
1

Where was this study conducted? The following caught my notice. female brains are especially active in the ... limbic system. ... limbic system controls motivation, behavior and emotions, like mood and anxiety. There was a study done measuring the affects of circumcision on infants and the limbic system was found to be highly affected. The following quote comes from an E-book on my personal machine. To test this theory, he had a doctor perform one of their routine circumcisions in an MRI scanner…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:22 PM
1

diamond producers have to hoard it or throw it in the ocean to keep diamond prices up Monopolies corrupt, absolute monopolies corrupt absolutely. If African culture were not a component then Canadian produced diamonds would be just a corrupt as African produced diamonds. but so are roses, greeting cards, Roses and greeting cards do not have a background of corrupt production practices, coco does. So what I see is corrupt production practices (coco/diamonds) and cultural consumption practices. Th…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:29 PM
1

Please show me how diamond jewelery is responsible for a bulk of its' worst practices as well as artificially inflating the price of diamonds From what I see the ethical problems stem from common unethical labour practices in Africa and a long term monopoly on the supply side of diamonds. Why do we buy chocolate? Have you never heard of buying chocolate on Valentines day, Easter, or Halloween? we don't buy chocolate due to social pressure
/r/MensRights08/08/17 05:12 PM
2

By that logic anyone that ever bought electronics should feel guilt because it uses coltran. Coltran is considered to be a blood mineral mined by unethical practices in the Congo and there is no way of telling if your consumer electronics are made of coltran from the Congo. Much of the worlds coca production has the same ethical issues so should you feel guilty every time you by chocolate? In case your wondering jewelery makes up a minor portion of the diamond industry. http://geology.com/minera…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 04:43 PM
2

Canadian diamond mines do exist and they are as good quality as anywhere else so while some of the old producers may be scamming people by claiming to be Canadian that just shows that they know there is consumer demand to clean up there practices.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:57 PM
4

Battery technology is progressing rapidly and while Cobalt is in demand for batteries now it my not be the same situation in a few years. I thought that the main problem with miners in the Congo was the coltran which is used in electronics. Coltran prices spiked during the initial Playstation 2 release.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:12 PM
1

Depends on where the diamond mine is located. Canada currently has some of the highest carat yield diamond mines in the world. Criticisms of Canadian diamonds mostly come from the older producers not liking the competition.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:04 PM
1

Posters that support MGM do get down voted here but banned is another level and requires some evidence. Edit: Reread the post and it is not clear that you were not talking about THIS subreddit.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 03:45 PM
2

Erin Pizzey web site on this topic is at https://honest-ribbon.org/
/r/MensRights30/07/17 03:39 PM
5

Confronting and processing the things that make you depressed can be a lot healthier then avoiding those things as avoidance can result in a ball of pain that never goes away.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:26 PM
4

Is this legal under freedom of speech rules I would say yes. It definitely breaks whatever truth in advertising standards may exist.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 01:42 PM
3

"well you're cut, do you have problems when it comes to feeling during sex?" which of course I don't, but I don't know any different either. Gently brush the back of you hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings that remain in cut penises. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating tickle nerve endings that exist in the foreskin in high concentrations. This should give you a partial example of what your missing sensation wise. Edit: Thread covering this topic. https://www.reddit.…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 04:46 PM
1

Yes that point was poorly formed, thanks for strengthening my weak areas. The pro-vaccine people seam to have blinders on and just dismiss all points that don't support there position regardless for the strength of the point.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:12 PM
1

This would make sense if the vaccine had a full life time effectiveness. It does not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Harper#Questioning_the_safety_and_efficacy_of_HPV_vaccines argued further against HPV vaccine mandates for schoolchildren, because "Population health models show that if the HPV vaccine does not last for at least 15 years, no cancers will ever be prevented; women will just get the cancers at a later time in life after the vaccine has worn off" and that Gardasil and Cervarix h…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:17 AM
1

Question: which of these two options sounds like the better one to you? a) detecting a disease at a reasonably early stage, most of the time or b) never catching the disease in the first place? As for never catching the disease in the first place your assuming the vaccine is effective and does not cause any problem of it's own. No vaccines have perfect effectiveness and all vaccines have side effects. The risk of HPV for those in there teens is so low to begin with that the benefit to them is ve…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 05:04 PM
1

It seems to be a result of improved screening picking up many cases at the pre-cancerous stage" So pap smears and throat swabs which have a near 100% detection rate look like the better option then vaccines. If the only new thing introduced since 2014 is the vaccine then why is the cervical cancer rate increasing since it's introduction or is there another factor that I'm missing? The vaccine is still so new that we only have data for very young adults at this stage. There's every reason to expe…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:00 PM
1

So the duration from 2014 to 2017 showing a rise in rates might to be too small a time period. How do you account for the drop in cervical cancer rate from 965 in 1982 to 813 in 2013? That is a 31 year period of time that mostly happened before the HPV vaccine. This means there are other factors in the rate then just the vaccine. None of the studies mentioned in the article you linked mention the possibility of cervical cancer rate factors other then the vaccine. A drop in genital warts rates of…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:02 PM
0

This is going to go against the general narrative here but this is actually good news. The HPV vaccine was started in Australia and has spread through out the rest of the world. So lets see how the Australian cervical cancer rates has changed over the time that the vaccine has been available there and before the vaccine was available there. https://cervical-cancer.canceraustralia.gov.au/statistics In 2013, there were 813 new cases of cervical cancer diagnosed in Australia. In 2017, it is estimat…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 02:03 PM
2

men are portrayed as better and more interesting than women Interesting characters are flawed. Some feminists complain about uninteresting female characters and others complain about flawed female characters. So basically they will complain no matter what you do.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:28 PM
4

The spin off cartoon Inspector Gadget followed the same pattern. It was mostly the same voice actors.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:16 PM
14

So the next doctor is now female. I wonder what gender the next companion is going to be. Are they going to be continuing the tradition of a male female dynamic duo traveling through space and time or just make another lesbian companion. Nardol is the only male I can think of from the doctors past that might make another appearance. There are at least five time traveling girls from the doctors past that are x-companions or he had a hand in making. The doctor becoming female is just the last male…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 12:56 PM
16

Malala Yousafzai was awarded the Nobel for peace. Her speeches are about females of all ages and boys rising up to fight against adult men. They are speeches of combat and conflict and have nothing to do with peace. I wonder who her handler is.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 12:51 PM
1

legal rights which are derived from the law of the land, given because of an obligation or duty, This does not seam right because women were given the right to vote and never had the obligation of giving back with civil and military conscription. So men had the right to vote due to legislated draft obligations while women had the privilege to vote due to legislation. Most countries have removed the draft obligation link from voting rights so does that mean those countries now have voting rights …
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:23 AM
2

It wasn't required to be topless down there, they did it because it was fucking hot. Yes it was fucking hot so it was required that all measures be taken to prevent heat exhaustion which would stop them from providing for there family. ban women AND children The children was mentioned early in the article. It was concern for children that started the original mining investigation. It occurs to me that by the definition of rights only being derived from obligations might be flawed. This would mea…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:49 AM
1

I see from another post you made you think being topless is not a right because rights are derived from obligations. By that definition the following story is a case where womens right to be topless was denied. http://www.historyextra.com/feature/scandal-female-miners-19th-century-britain The scandal of female miners in 19th-century Britain. Images of topless women and girls working down mines
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:11 AM
1

That does not make any sense. Please explain.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 10:31 PM
1

I should clarify. It is my understanding that when there were large scale industrial accidents that affected only males preventative measures were generally not implemented because accidents were cheap. However when women were involved in these accidents the public out cry made the accident that much more expensive for the offending company and preventative measures were more likely to be implement. Have not been able to pinpoint a specific example just a general outline. http://eh.net/encyclope…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 07:53 PM
1

My understanding is that historically women getting into the more dangerous jobs resulted in improved safety procedures and equipment because management was worried about women being hurt. As a side effect fewer men were injured as well.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 04:59 PM
17

There is only one that I can think of and it does not apply in all jurisdictions. The right to be topless in public.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 01:40 PM
1

It is possible the reason they didn't bring up circumcision and make the comparison is that it is simply not part of their thought process. They were talking about girl things and circumcision is a boy thing. Even if it is part of there awareness it can be difficult to talk about. I hope that one day you will be able to bring up the topic yourself as it is unlikely your family will bring it up.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 01:33 PM
11

The following line is the most concerning. https://www.yahoo.com/news/doctor-jodie-whittaker-replace-peter-152819072.html She said fans must not be "fearful", added that she is a feminist who does not want to be “boxed in by what you’re told you can and can’t be”. The last season was full of you-go-girl and boys-suck undertones and that statement makes it look like it will continue.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 01:32 AM
1

If they do have a female doctor what odds do you think that there will be a male companion? Yes there have been male companions in the past but they have all been secondary companions to various females. Doctor Who becoming all primarily female with secondary males showing up occasionally just would not be as good a show.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:59 PM
6

There is a large variation in outcomes due to circumcision. Your description tells me that you might be lucky it didn't all go to plan because if it did you would not have that marble part where you can get off in 30 seconds. If the marble part feels a tickle similar to brushing the palm of your hand then that is foreskin tissue. Your actually in an interesting position where you can describe the difference between being cut and intact.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:28 PM
5

The pronhub data shows that women are more likely to search and view girl on girl porn than men are. https://www.pornhub.com/insights/what-women-want
/r/MensRights06/07/17 01:08 PM
3

Seam to recall hearing about extortion rackets being run by women in India where the leverage being used was the accusation of rape.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 12:19 PM
5

I enjoyed this episode overall as well. As for the SJW side it was there in many subtle ways and clear in the following lines. Doctor: Do as she says. Master: Do as she says. Is the future going to be all girl? Doctor: We can only hope. Me: F you! ... Doctor: Can you throw? Girl: Better than all the boys. Edit: Got exact quote.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:24 PM
4

http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2013/04/putting-to-rest-the-myth-that-womens-teams-dont-let-male-reporters-into-the-locker-room/ https://www.quora.com/Why-arent-male-reporters-allowed-in-womens-changing-rooms-as-they-are-showering?share=1 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=male+reporter+in+female+locker+rooms&t=h_&ia=web
/r/MensRights01/07/17 09:54 PM
6

My understand is that the ruling meant that male reporters could enter female locker rooms as well. While reporters are allowed in male locker rooms at any time reporters are banned from female locker rooms until the women have finished getting dressed.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 01:31 PM
1

Your statement reads like your looking for pick up artist information. This subreddit does not really have that type of information.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 01:54 PM
9

My understanding is that the biggest drop in circumcision rates happen after the state stops paying for the procedure.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 12:49 PM
2

making men the default The word men is the gender neutral term. We used to have weremen and wereman to refer to adult males but that got dropped from the language so now we default to the gender neutral terms men and man when referring to males. The following lines are gender neutral. "All men are created equal." "To boldly go where no man has gone before."
/r/MensRights24/06/17 12:47 PM
1

Understood, thanks.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:50 PM
1

So would you say that "There is too much variation in circumstances between cut men to have the sensations described with a single diagram."?
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:44 PM
3

I'm guessing the kind difference is similar to the difference between the feeling of the palm of your hand and the back of your hand.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 04:19 PM
4

Depends on how old you were when you were circumcised. If you were circumcised when you were 18 then you would know what a normal body feels like. Edit: For those that have not looked at the diagram it is a sensitivity map comparing intact and cut.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 01:17 PM
3

I think there are a number of people in the news media from many different countries that are subbed here.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:20 PM
13

A woman once described to me her first really bad hangover after a night of drinking. She compared it with childbirth and said the hangover was much worse.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:43 AM
1

Well they decided that Cervarix only lasted for 9.4 years. Why would they only study one for 5 years and the other for longer? Did you read far enough on the page to see the 20,000 reports to the CDC of side effects on Gardasil? If they covered up the limited effectiveness and side effect information for the earlier Gardasil not sure how I could trust that Gardasil 9 is actually better.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:57 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Harper#Questioning_the_safety_and_efficacy_of_HPV_vaccines https://books.google.ca/books?id=3MeQVLE49oYC&pg=PA137&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=last%20for%205&f=false
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:08 PM
2

"We've targeted the program to Grade 6 girls and now Grade 6 boys to better promote the broad coverage needed for effective herd immunity," he said in a statement. The school immunization program will use the Gardasil 9 vaccine If you believe the manufacturer Gardasil is effective for 5 years which means by grade 11 the vaccine will be useless and the HPV risk at those ages is virtually zero. At best this is an expensive program that only helps the vaccine manufacturer and at worst it does harm …
/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:49 PM
5

Once again the claims that this is good for children and has been an effective vaccine is easily debunked. The cervical cancer incidence rate in Australia has remained stable since 2002 and there has even been a small rise in the rate. That is 15 years with a small rise in the incidence rate. https://cervical-cancer.canceraustralia.gov.au/statistics In 2013, there were 813 new cases of cervical cancer diagnosed in Australia. In 2017, it is estimated that 912 new cases of cervical cancer will be …
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:07 PM
1

How about suggesting pricing based on the gender spending gap. Women around the world make more purchases then men do which means world wide women have more purchasing power. So overall while men may be doing what it takes to earn money the majority of that purchasing power is somehow going to and is being exercised by women.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 03:21 AM
2

She said: "This helps to prevent the spread of the disease in girls and boys." sons Zak, 13 and Finn, 11 to be immunised. The girls and boys this program is target at are usually too young to be having sex. The stated goal of these programs is to vaccinate them before they become sexually active. If a child in grade 6 is vaccinated then by the time they finish high school the vaccine will have worn off. Statistics for girls in Australia show that HPV does not become even a minor risk until they …
/r/MensRights07/06/17 09:04 PM
1

The theory I have heard about this is when a married king was the ruling monarch he generally covered both foreign and domestic issues. When a married queen was the ruling monarch she covered foreign or domestic issues while he covered the other issues. When they were both sharing the work load they were more able to carry out big projects like war.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:29 PM
3

They do it at such a young age the body is not even fully developed and there is evidence it plays a significant role in later development. Correlations indicate circumcised men have higher rates of learning disabilities and have higher alexithymia scores. People with alexithymia have difficulty identifying and expressing their feelings. The data in one MRI circumcision study indicated that circumcision affected most intensely the portions of the brain associated with reasoning, perception and e…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:31 AM
8

I have heard it said that men in military service are actually more at risk of being sexually abused then people in the general population because people are less likely to believe that the man could be innocent.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:05 AM
3

Cassie explained early in The Red Pill documentary that the only reason she looked at MRA's is because of the infuriating articles being published online. Being humble and offering honey had been tried for a long time and was mostly ignored. What seams to be working is offering something that is bitter-sweet. The bitter-sweet mix seams to be even more potent when offered by a woman.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 07:43 PM
3

The following video series is well put together and may be of interest to you now that you have had an introductory experience. https://archive.org/details/ManWomanMyth
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:55 PM
5

This article looks like HPV vaccination marketing material. There is a big push happening now for this vaccine and many people and politicians have fallen for the fear based marketing. Until I know more about who funded the research I am not going to trust it.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 09:25 PM
6

Wow the WHO is really displaying a complete lack of awareness around this issue. "It reflects deep-rooted inequality between the sexes and constitutes an extreme form of discrimination against women. It is nearly always carried out on minors and is a violation of the rights of children," according to the WHO.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 04:58 PM
2

Have heard that the rules of conduct set out by this provincial Tribunal have been adopted at the federal level in a bill called C16. The bill has passed the senate and is just waiting to be formally signed into law. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnIAAkSNtqo
/r/MensRights22/05/17 04:04 PM
7

I'm surprised there is an actual course with "Social Justice" in the title. Think you would be better off getting some of your class mates to see the movie. A single person going against the teacher's statements is easy to dismiss but if a group of people are saying the same thing it is not so easy to dismiss.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:43 PM
1

Correct Nerve endings =/= pleasure Pleasure nerve endings = pleasure Cut or not the hormones released into the blood stream during sex are the same. Brush the back of your hand. These are pain nerve endings and what remain in cut males. Brush the palm of your hand. These are tickle/pleasure nerve endings that exist in foreskin. Circumcision scars heal one of two ways. Either the pain nerve endings die off resulting in numbness or grow uncontrollably resulting in intense sensitivity.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:49 PM
3

There is the old line about the male having to hide his dirty magazines under the mattress or in a closet or private web browser mode these days. There seams to be this great sometimes negative reaction to men with visual aids imagining himself with a woman. This seams more comparable to a woman hiding sex toys where a man may not be in the picture.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:47 PM
1

Your comment on "Nobody with my genes needs to see in color that would be too much." puzzled me and it has helped me put some pieces together. The remaining pain nerves surrounding circumcision scars react during healing in one of two ways. They either die off leaving the scar numb or they grow uncontrollably leaving the scar with intense sensitivity. I don't know what determines which will happen. Judging by your comments the latter is what happened to you. For intact men during sex the pain ne…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:50 PM
3

Researchers find circumcised men have higher alexithymia scores than intact men. Alexithymia is the inability to process emotions. http://intactnews.org/node/131/1316710012/study-links-circumcision-personality-trait-disorder
/r/MensRights04/05/17 01:28 PM
2

It is not about comparing the intensity as it is the type of sensation. The hormones released into the blood stream during sex is the same either way. The best analogy I have heard is being cut is to seeing in black and white as being intact is to seeing in color. I have already accomplished what I want to do and that is to increase the knowledge around this topic. It now becomes up to others as to what to do with this knowledge.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 01:25 PM
6

Gently brush the back of your hand. You are stimulating pain nerve endings. This is what remains in cut males. Gently brush the palm of your hand. You are stimulating tickle nerve endings. These nerve endings exist in the foreskin in high concentrations.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 01:06 PM
5

I heard sex is better for uncircumcised homosexual males. Whoever told you this only told you half the truth. Sex is better for intact heterosexual activity and leads to better experiences for both male and female involved.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 12:48 PM
2

Erin Pizzey's site can now be found at https://honest-ribbon.org/
/r/MensRights29/04/17 10:13 PM
2

I've heard this before and it was more to due with division of tasks then it was aggressiveness. When a king was on the throne he was tasked with both foreign and domestic issues while his spouse was just there. When a queen was on the throne she dealt with foreign issues while her spouse dealt with domestic issues. Couples that shared the work load were able to take on larger projects such as war.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 12:00 PM
7

They keep blaming the practice on patriarchy and blame a male religious leader in the community. They then go on to talk about how it is only women that are pushing and promoting the practice. There are occasional hints that the type of female cutting happening is type IV which is a scraping or pinprick that leaves no evidence that the procedure happened. Some of the cutting was type I which removes the prepuce (aka clitoral hood) but there are hints that that type is becoming more rare. There i…
/r/MensRights27/04/17 10:51 PM
4

The study you have linked to is a circumcision-STD correlation that tries to eliminate as many non-circumcision factors as possible. This correlation suggest that circumcision leads to lower STD rates. The study suggests a possible causation. with some researchers suggesting that this is because of a particular vulnerability to the HIV virus in the cells of the male foreskin The correlation I have stated covers much larger populations and takes into account all possible STD rate factors in each …
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:41 PM
7

Interesting study on Circumcision and STI rates in New Zealand you have linked to. I'm not sure what to make of it. I stand by my statement. The US has high rates of circumcision and high rates of STI's while Europe has lower rates of circumcision and much lower rates of STI's.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 03:28 PM
4

countries that dont have the same hygiene levels it can be suggested as a good idea For countries that don't have good hygiene levels it is still not a good idea. For those that are young enough the foreskin is still fused to the glans and can remain so until about 17 years. The fused glans does not allow anything in and only the outside needs to be tended to. Once separation happens during puberty the foreskin generates smegma which is like a naturally occurring anti-bacterial soap. Females pro…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 12:09 PM
10

Although I personally don't have a foreskin (or a penis) This is a female author which means she was born with a prepuce. The prepuce is called the clitoral hood in females and foreskin in males. foreskin is said to hold 30% of the penis's erogenous nerve endings 30% sounds like a low number considering the foreskin makes up more than 30% of the penis skin and contains high density nerve ending tissue. The prepuce contains nerve ending types that don't exist in other parts of the genitals so nea…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 01:47 PM
3

We have woman and women to refer to female adults. We used to have wereman and weremen or something similar for adult males but that got dropped from the language. My understanding is that man and men are the gender neutral terms used refer to adults. Since the words to refer to adult males has been lost we just use the generic words man and men when talking about adult males. Phrases like "All men are created equal" and "To boldly go where no man has gone before" are gender neutral. We have jus…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:43 PM
1

I have not up voted or down voted anyone in this thread. Someone did down vote without adding to the conversation because my response to your comment on the validity of the statistics is at zero. I assumed it was your voting because this thread is old enough that very few people will see it now.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 08:30 PM
1

Down voting me instead of actually coming up with counter points. That says a lot. :)
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:37 PM
0

Used statistics that I'm aware of. HPV statistics on women are hard to find and I've been unable to find any for men for any country. This is likely because it is considered to be a minor infection and doctors just don't report it if they find it. I wonder what statistics the Saskatchewan government used to justify the program for both genders. So here is some Canadian information. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/human-papillomavirus-hpv.html There is no equivalent of Pa…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 02:25 PM
1

LOL, what wonderfully insightful analysis. I didn't even say vaccines are bad. Just that this vaccine is extremely hard to justify according to vaccine manufacturer information, CDC information, and real world statistics.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 01:01 AM
1

vaccinate Saskatchewan boys will prevent many types of cancers in the future This is false. The risk of getting HPV before the age of 20 is very low. The vaccine will have worn off before the risk of infection becomes real. https://cervical-cancer.canceraustralia.gov.au/statistics Cancerous HPV statistics are for females in Australia. The rates can't be that different for males in Canada. infection for 15-19 years 0.1 per hundred thousand 20-24 years 1.6 per hundred thousand https://en.wikipedia…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:21 PM
6

In a environment where there was heavy lifting and manual labour the traditional gender roles reasserted themselves and the women were the main drivers of this. What would happen in a environment where the manual labour jobs were minimized by things like automation? What would happen if service industry jobs became the dominant job? How would gender rolls play out in that case?
/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:54 PM
1

Listened to a radio show a few years ago about testosterone. It interviewed a male who had low T and someone that was being give T injections to transition from female to male. The low T male had a very low sex drive to the point where his girlfriend was getting frustrated due to the lack of sex. He also felt just as satisfied by a bowl of plain porridge as dining out at a fine restaurant. The person getting T injections had levels over two times the average male levels. They spoke about how the…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 08:08 PM
0

I get your point it can be a cheap shot. The woman's protest from my perspective contained lots of energy going to minor, meaningless, and misguided things. Thanks to /u/Parvan for showing that some of that energy was put toward making peoples lives better. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5z9a6v/while_the_protesters_of_portlands_womens_march/dex4wqh/
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:03 PM
3

Thank you for the information. That puts the picture in a different light. A picture can speak a thousand words but a few words can change the entire meaning of a picture.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:06 PM
7

Please show me evidence that feminists care about men's issues.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:34 PM
10

At what point are feminists content? Do you really think the things the Portland women's marcher's were complaining about were big issues compared with what the men were dealing with?
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:17 PM
17

The "advocating equality for all" demands are based on the belief that women have it worse then men. They are demanding that women be lifted up to the level that they believe men are already at. The picture clearly shows they don't know what they are talking about.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:56 PM
10

Lets look at some of the things the Portland women's march was about. As they walked, marchers chanted “Love Trumps Hate,” and “Fired Up! Let’s Go!” and “Who deserves equal rights? Everybody!” They included sharp political messages, silly puns and heartfelt demands for equal rights. “And Justice For All,” “Solidarity,” “Make America Think Again,” “We Go High” and a simple “Nope” sign tapped into political language and recent campaign slogans. Some offered a more pointed message for Maine politic…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:37 PM
1

I agree. There was actually a single study done in 2006 that suggests a possible causation. It was performed by Doctor Paul D. Tinari of the Pacific Institute for Advanced Study. It involved a single circumcision before the study was canceled by the ethics board at the hospital. Not sure but the data might have been destroyed as well. An MRI was done on an infant before, during, after, and weeks after circumcision. Dramatic changes occurred in the child’s limbic system – especially the parts of …
/r/MensRights17/02/17 10:51 PM
1

Yes I know you were clarifying. Now I'm asking if I had provided enough research so that the correlation does deserve some merit. So has that been done? A correlation simply states the more often x happens the more or less often y happens. Correlation says nothing about why it happens just that it does happen. By asking for biological mechanisms of how one leads to the other your asking for evidence of causation. One can only guess at the why one might cause the other because to the best of my k…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 10:43 PM
1

Were the parameters provided by the quotes enough to view the correlation with less skepticism?
/r/MensRights15/02/17 10:21 PM
2

I read your comment and what I saw was a long way of saying any suggestion between circumcision and development problems is ridiculousness so don't look at it. I'm not sure how much weight should be put toward such a correlation but I'm not willing to completely dismiss it either. The following quotes are from a book called "Please Dont Circumcise Your Baby Boy". Thank you Roland Hulme for writing this book. In a paper entitled Ritual circumcision and risk of autism spectrum disorder in 0- to 9-…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 09:05 PM
1

That is why I stated correlation and not causation. There are few developmental factors that can be so easily broken down into gender specific factors like circumcision. working with young children with disabilities and noticed the stark difference in number of boys with disabilities when compared to girls Pollutants such as estrogen mimicking endocrine disruptor's could contribute to gender specific developmental problems as well and I would not be surprised to find out there is a correlation h…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 05:27 PM
1

Do you live in a place where circumcision rates are high? I ask because there have been correlations found between areas with high circumcision rates and higher rates of boys with developmental problems. That is not to say one causes the other but there may be a link.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:55 PM
6

I recommended for everyone that they take breaks while shoveling snow. If you have just done some strenuous lifting and your heart rate is high then stop and wait 2 minutes for your heart rate to drop down to a resting state. The practice of training your body to return to a resting state can have great health benefits. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZ_BGhA7SK8
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:33 PM
3

For the reporters, technically no double standard as they all follow the same rules. For the athletes yes a double standard as the rules differ by gender.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 05:41 PM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 05:41 PM
3

My understanding is that reporters have equal access to sports locker rooms regardless of the reporter or athletes gender. While reporters have access to male locker rooms they only have access to womens locker rooms after the female athletes have finished changing.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 04:45 PM
2

So this really is a regular thing for you. If you want it to stop I don't know what options you would have. Guessing not many. We travel in different circles.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 11:06 PM
4

I never said "groping, assaulting, and removing someone's underwear" were compliments or that you "purposefully attracted" this behaviour. Your story indicates that you changed how you dealt with such things after you noticed your boyfriend didn't like it. Does this mean what happened before was all bad? Which is worse getting too much attention or getting little to no attention? Either way it can affect your self esteem.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 07:44 PM
3

So your saying while on a business trip which can indicate your making a decent living (money), you likely dressed well for the occasion, apparently your physically fit and you got women paying attention to you. That is not surprising at all and it is probably not typical daily life. The OP's story described typical regular events where all she did was go out to have fun.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 06:01 PM
1

Just to give you an idea of the other side. Compliments and sexual attention for many men can be a very rare thing, even for decent looking men. This can result in confusion when they do happen. A simple compliment like "nice tie" can become is she flirting with me or is she making fun of me? Your story looks like you learned how to deal with compliments and sexual attention. That is until you noticed your uncomfortable boyfriend who likely was not familiar with such things and had not learned h…
/r/MensRights10/02/17 02:15 PM
4

Historically men marching and complaining has little impact. Men bringing up facts and logic and rationality can have some impact. Men threatening to go on strike or going on strike has a major impact. How does one go on strike against courts, circumcision, or homelessness?
/r/MensRights05/02/17 02:32 PM
3

One thing I disagree with in the video. He says that marriage for males results in a higher likely hood of being employed. I think it is the other way around in that for males paying jobs results in a higher likely hood of becoming and staying married.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 03:51 PM
1

Strip To divest of clothing; to uncover. [1913 Webster]
/r/MensRights03/02/17 05:36 PM
1

If there was no stigma when changing in front of another sex I wonder what would happen to strip clubs.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 02:21 PM
1

Well the entire clitoris is very large and I think would be difficult if not impossible to estimate the nerve ending count. Guessing that the number would be well over 20000. As far as the tip of the clitoris that might be removed during circumcision, I don't think that it would be enough to add up to the 20000 number as it is less tissue then the clitoral hood at 9000 nerve endings. So do you have enough information to answer the question on which is worse?
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:55 PM
1

How many nerve ending does what have? The entire clitoris or just the small tip of the clitoris that might be removed during female circumcision.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:09 PM
1

Maybe he will be able to tell his daughter something other then complete lies. That would be good.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:35 PM
5

The clitoris is a very large tissue. Have heard speculation that the g-spot is just the inner most part of the clitoral tissue. So yes a small part of the clitoris itself might be removed.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:29 PM
4

The most common type of circumcision is removal of the prepuce. For females the prepuce is the clitoral hood. Conservative estimates put 9000 sexually sensitive nerve endings in the clitoral hood. Remaining tissue is protected. For males the prepuce is the foreskin. Conservative estimates put 20000 sexually sensitive nerve endings in the foreskin. Remaining tissue is exposed. Which is worse?
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:13 PM
2

That is the one. We also find out her name is Sexy in that episode.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:20 AM
3

Don't think the TARDIS would take too kindly to a female Doctor. She was shown to be a very female character in one of the episodes.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:26 AM
6

Tight foreskin as a reason to have a circumcision does not make sense as circumcision removes skin which leaves less room for movement. I'm guessing you mean the ridged band was too tight and not allowing the head out. It is disappointing that you didn't find out about stretching of the ridged band. If simple daily stretching over time was not helping enough then you could have gotten steroid creams to help the process along. The circumcision operation was not necessary. Stretching works as it i…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 05:24 PM
3

Lauren does a lot of work in Ontario Canada. Thanks to womens protest marches in the early 1990's it is legal for women to be topless in public. The public decency laws in Ontario are gender neutral.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:05 PM
5

Actually it is a trade off. Men tend to have more physical strength then women but when men get sick (eg cold/flu) it takes a higher toll and longer to recover.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 05:12 PM
2

As for the professional sports gender pay gap I think this is common knowledge. As for the fashion gender pay gap there I don't have any references handy. Reference on the porn pay gap. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmb3yimls2c Have heard about recent studies in UK that show women in there 20's earning more then men in there 20's but can't find them right now. The rest of the claims made in the following video pretty much hold true today. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUpgoayBPJc
/r/MensRights17/01/17 11:43 PM
13

Looks like they are spreading the pay gap propaganda. With the exception of a few jobs like professional sports, fashion, and porn there is no gender pay gap. There is an overall gender earnings gap in favour of men. For those in their 20's the earnings gap is actually in womens favour. The gap does not end up in mens favour until their 40's. For women that never marry the earning gap often ends up remaining in their favour. Based on a nine to five day, they point to the time a woman should does…
/r/MensRights17/01/17 09:31 PM
1

The study also found despite the lingering economic doom, soaring cost of living and stagnant housing market the majority of us have adopted a Monty Python-style 'Always look on the bright side of life' attitude. The darkest and most oppressive of times tend to create the most uplifting art. Maybe men who don't have much are just taking a look on the bright side of life and deciding to be happy with what they have. workaholism. While almost no women came to her for treatment 25 years ago, fully …
/r/MensRights13/01/17 02:13 PM
1

This article is talking about cervical cancer rates for Australia. So lets have a look at the Australian rates. https://cervical-cancer.canceraustralia.gov.au/statistics In 2012, there were 869 new cases of cervical cancer diagnosed in Australia. In 2016, it is estimated that 903 new cases of cervical cancer will be diagnosed in Australia This 50% reduction claim over 10 years seams to be highly dubious to me. Another great thing about this page is stats on the prevalence by age. It looks like c…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 03:20 AM
1

How many types are considered to cause cancer? If there are for example 15 cancer causing HPV types the numbers change below. 100 sexually active people -> 75 infections over a life time -> 28.1 potentially cancer causing -> 2.8 persistent infections -> 1.4 cases of a treatable form of cancer 100 sexually active people -> 75 infections over a life time -> 28.1 potentially cancer causing -> 11.24 potentially cancerous infections due to vaccine -> 1.1 persistent infections -> 0.55 cases of a treat…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 10:55 PM
3

Article three out of four sexually active people contracting the virus at some point in their lives provides protection against nine types of HPV A 75% infection rate sounds bad and protects against 9 HPV types that sounds good. http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats14/surv-2014-print.pdf Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States. Over 40 distinct types can infect the genital tract; about 90% of infections are asymptomatic and resolve spontaneously w…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:44 PM
2

FYI, even if you or a partner contracts the infection and it is not found or treated there is a 90% chance it will be "asymptomatic and resolve spontaneously within two years" according to the CDC.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 07:31 PM
1

If it was the Gardasil vaccine then it wore off 5 years ago and you have no protection. If it was the Cervarix vaccine then it wore of a little over 6 months ago and you have no protection. That is if you believe the vaccine manufacturers on the duration of effectiveness.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 07:01 PM
1

Are you now over the age of 23? If so then there is a good chance you think your protected from 9 out of 40+ types of HPV when you are not. In the mean time there are side effects that you apparently were lucky not to get.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 04:56 PM
2

I am very impressed with the marketing power of the vaccine company. They are successfully getting governments to pay for something that will have limited effectiveness and may be potentially harmful. First it is pointless to give the vaccine to someone that is too young as it might wear off before they become sexually active. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Harper#Questioning_the_safety_and_efficacy_of_HPV_vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix have only been shown to last for 5 and 9.4 years respe…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 02:36 PM
2

Gently brush the palm of your hand. You should feel a mild tickle. The tickle comes from one of the nerve ending types that also exist in the foreskin. So tickling someone's palm is a way of giving someone that does not have a foreskin a partial example of what they are missing out on.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 02:40 AM
12

Good job. You have compared the most extreme and rare form of female circumcision to the most common and least invasive form of male circumcision and declared women have it worse. There are rare and extreme forms of male circumcision that are just as bad if not worse than infiublation. There are common forms of female circumcision that leave no physical trace that anything happened. There is no form of male circumcision that is this mild.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 02:34 PM
4

This looks like a clash between cultures. French feminists may be the only group that has a chance of pushing back against the invading culture. The push back may be short lived if they continue making a negative impact on French men in there own culture.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 02:17 PM
5

Nobody knows what the future will bring, that is why it is better to deal with the here and now. In the here and now men seeking sexual services are being restricted not freed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Canada Current laws on prostitution in Canada, introduced in 2014, make it illegal to purchase sexual services but legal to sell them.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 12:01 AM
6

From what I can see Feminist leaders are radical in that they actively hinder rights of other groups. From what I can see Mens Rights leaders are radical in that speaking truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:42 PM
18

As I have learned more about the history of Feminism it has become clear that the movement has always been driven by radicals. These radicals are quite happy to let the majority believe the movement is moderate and good for everybody because it provides support for the drivers to continue being radical.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 02:13 PM
2

While I don't agree with the idea of fines there is a good reason to make sure women have straws. Lipstick is very difficult to get off of glass.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 05:52 PM
5

It seams to me that you are actively trying to find out about yourself. Stating your situation here and asking for information will bring needed information to people that you don't even know. This is not useless.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 06:57 PM
4

Sometimes I think the terms "equal" and "equivalent" are, well, equivalent; their meanings overlap, and the precise distinction can vary from one case to another. But in general, equal means that two entities are the same entity equivalent means that two entities have the same EFFECT, in some sense Stepping on a puppies paw is morally equal to stepping on a puppies tail as they cause pain either way. I cannot say they are equivalent as they EFFECT different areas of the body. I can say that male…
/r/MensRights24/12/16 01:53 PM
3

I cannot say with complete certainty that they are morally equivalent and I cannot think of a reason that they are not equivalent. Maybe asking if they are morally equal would be better as that does not have as strict a mathematical definition.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 05:19 AM
2

Good point but gender quotas particularly political motivated gender quotas are not usually about increasing the number of women in low level positions. Gender quotas have been applied to promotions with in companies which is clearly about power. Even for low level positions a person that is given a job has more then the person that is denied a job.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 09:58 PM
6

Gendered quotas are the act of putting women in positions of power to the exclusion men. The question becomes why should anyone decide it is good to be sexist like this in the first place. The answer seams to be substantive equality. There is a general belief that women have been excluded from some positions historically and that the only way to make up for that perceived injustice it to be unjust against men now. In other words two wrongs make a right kind of logic. One of the best ways to unra…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 01:55 PM
5

You could respond with this image. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRants/comments/5bhyyg/venn_diagram_on_feminism/
/r/MensRights16/12/16 05:11 PM
29

So I'll be able to look up the college records of any woman that I'm hiring to see if they made a rape accusation. That is how it will work right? ;)
/r/MensRights11/12/16 01:22 PM
1

The chant "Racist, sexist, anti-gay, MRA's go away." was the same chant used used years ago at a Toronto protest. The accusations made by the chant are easily demonstrated as false by anyone that takes even a brief look. The information the protesters have sounds like a list of hastily put together talking points. These protesters have not progressed at all and it makes me wonder if they are getting paid or if they are useful idiots.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:30 PM
4

The STD prevention claim is false. The US has some of the highest rates of STD and circumcision in the industrialized world. If that does not debunk the claim then I don't know what will.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:22 PM
2

There are treatments available that do not require cutting. First just try stretching it. There are steroid creams that you can get from a doctor that can help. Circumcision is a last resort option that has many negative effects and there is dispute over the claimed positive effects.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:19 PM
10

This kind of thing is not new. I have heard calls about cracking down on male customers harassing female server staff for a long time. Don't see similar calls to crack down on customers harassing male serving staff. It is just another form of lets protect the women and leave the men to fend for themselves attitude. It is mostly expressed by those not in the service industry. People in the service industry either learn to deal with all types of people or fall out of the service industry very quic…
/r/MensRights28/11/16 05:47 PM
1

I wonder how much of this is due to estrogen mimicking compounds in our industrialized environment. While the article did spend some time discussing a female to male case they gave many passing examples of male to female. What is the ratio of these two possibilities?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 02:27 PM
1

This looks like a quote from Miss Havisham from the Great Expectations novel.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 01:51 PM
1

Just going on a guess here but it seams to me that in a hunter gather environment men would gather raw resources while women process and distribute resources. Some of the processed resources would be given back to men so that they can continue to gather raw resources. Of course greed can override this flow of resources.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 12:49 AM
1

Rephrase. How would you suggest these be put into the diagram?
/r/MensRights29/10/16 08:52 PM
1

Feminists won't accept is as valid. It is not meant for feminists. The Oppression Olympics - and the Fourth Dimension of The Victim Decathlon How would you suggest these be represented?
/r/MensRights29/10/16 08:06 PM
2

Propaganda is not dependent on money/power or gynocentrism/misandry. It may involve those things but it is not dependent on them. Propaganda is dependent on lies or half truths and activism. Maybe lies should be expanded to include half-truths.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 03:58 PM
6

So you think I should post it there as well. Thanks for the suggestion.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 03:53 PM
11

Hesitated to post this image as I though this would just be more feminist bashing. After some consideration I think it might be useful for those learning about mens rights as figuring out how feminism plays a role in gender politics seams to be a major component of learning about mens rights. Criticisms welcome.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 01:56 PM
1

Yes there is and the majority of those boob grabs is obviously consensual and the rest are likely consensual as there is no look of surprise after the grab. The penis grabs have many that are likely consensual and some that look like they may not be consensual due to the look of surprise after the grab.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 01:22 AM
3

This project is in the early stages. http://lighthouse.iamthelaw.ca/
/r/MensRights17/10/16 03:06 PM
1

Her questions are long and leading and she gives Mike little chance to address these long leading questions. She scolds him for trying to respond more then once. She is supportive up to the point of Mike stating something she does not agree with then she tells him that he is wrong.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 01:27 AM
1

While she does support the anti-MGM position she is still very heavily misinformed on the topic and tries to put her misinformation above the information that Mike is giving.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 12:19 AM
8

Google has a history of being biased on political issues and I would consider Erin Pizzey and her work to be political in nature. If your searching for something political in nature I suggest you don't use google.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 11:55 PM
1

A sandwich. I'm hungry. After reading the article think that is the kind of answer they are looking for. If I make my own sandwich does that make me a MGTOW?
/r/MensRights04/10/16 09:26 PM
15

There are a few jobs where you do get more based on your gender such as modeling, porn, and sports. Women tend to get more in tips and tend to make more in some sales jobs such as industrial equipment where the clients are mostly male. The pay difference is often based on the amount of money brought in by that job. Jobs where men get paid more tend to be 50-80% more while jobs where women get paid more it tends to be 100-300%+ more. Edit: grammar
/r/MensRights26/09/16 02:29 PM
2

This could be environmental in part. There are many estrogen mimicking compounds in our industrialized environment. Together with a general lowering of testosterone in males and females for I don't know what reasons it could be just easier hormonally to figure out the M to F then F to M for those that may have such tendencies.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 02:35 PM
3

The " safety, not touching the kids, diversity and inclusivity " stuff really comes from fear of legal suits. There are very few insurance companies that will cover Scout group activities and they require this kind of material to minimize risk and show that due diligence was performed to the best ability in case something does go wrong.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 01:32 PM
1

Interesting if you go to http://whiteribbon.org/ it redirects to http://honest-ribbon.org/ which appears to be registered with Erin Pizzey.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 10:07 PM
1

I would call it an attempt at rationalization of otherwise irrational fears.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 08:25 PM
3

So I get it now. Women can be false accusers, rapists, or gold diggers there fore to use the skittles analogy on women is perfectly valid. The men avoiding women even though that particular one may not be a false accuser, rapist, or gold digger is valid because the women remain alive and well and able to work and feed their children and walk back to their homes. Lets try another, some dogs bite and some cats scratch people there fore ...
/r/MensRights22/09/16 01:51 PM
3

Have had a chance to listen to the other speakers. The qualification of the speakers do get better as do the quality of the points being made. The last speaker defending masculinity after speaking about a number of pressures faced mainly by men due to societal structures says: We can address the structural inequalities against women while also addressing the inequalities against men. Men are dying alone and desperate, masculinity is not the cause of that, a very particular form of it could be, t…
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:32 PM
3

Watched to opening remarks of the debaters. The woman who is defending masculinity does not make very good arguments. Her best argument is that to say there is nothing good in masculinity and it is harmful to everyone is so extreme that it can't possibly be true. She then closes her statement by saying that after talking with many men she is hopeful for the future. Makes me think that if the debate title were not so extreme she would be debating against masculinity.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 01:45 PM
1

Didn't know that feminists were on the men's rights bandwagon which to me implies support, thought they were just against it. ManWomanMyth did make a great series and for any that have not seen it is worth seeing.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 03:02 PM
3

Men are raped during war it is just not talked about. While the women are raped they are usually set free and there are often support services available. The men if they are lucky enough to live after being raped they are often physically damaged due to the experience and they don't talk about it because if they do they are often shunned by their community and family. https://encrypted.google.com/#q=congo%20male%20rape https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_violence_in_the_Democratic_Republic_of_t…
/r/MensRights17/09/16 02:44 PM
2

While HPV is thought to be common nobody knows how common because doctors consider it such a minor type of infection they don't report it. Quote from CDC Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2014 http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats14/surv-2014-print.pdf Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States. Over 40 distinct types can infect the genital tract; about 90% of infections are asymptomatic and resolve spontaneously within two years. However, pe…
/r/MensRights14/09/16 01:41 PM
2

There was an article posted recently written by a UK woman where she complained that men were not approaching her and when she approached them she would often get a negative response. Think this describes the average male dating world fairly well starting from puberty. I'm guessing that she was exaggerating her situation and yes it is a miserable situation to be in.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 01:24 PM
1

This looks like a modern version of "The emperor's new clothes" fairy tale. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperor%27s_New_Clothes
/r/MensRights01/09/16 12:59 PM
1

Had not see that thread. Thanks.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 01:54 PM
3

children are a consequence of sex? This is common knowledge or do you think there is some isolated tribal group out there that has not figured this out for themselves yet?
/r/MensRights14/08/16 10:38 PM
1

TINDER EXPERIMENT: MEN VS WOMEN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lY8rzo4Ik4M
/r/MensRights14/08/16 10:28 PM
1

Where does one draw the line? No gender specific sports. How about no single gender dorms or fraternities and sororities? Should one go as far as shower areas, change rooms, toilets?
/r/MensRights10/08/16 09:37 PM
1

By this logic Title IX would have a problem with gender separate toilets, change rooms, and shower areas. edit and sports teams.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 11:57 PM
2

I was not really asking as to whether it is a good idea or not. Just seamed like the only solution that was even considered was the one that made sure men didn't have any space. There used to be mens only clubs and lounges so it is possible that such an area would be used by men. I know of mixed gender Scout groups where the genders often segregate themselves just because the boys and girls are interested in different activities.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 09:41 PM
2

This answer makes the most sense to me. If the room was being under used then I can easily see how the room might have been close to being used for something more productive or opened up to men to increase usage. This may just be something the womans studies department decided they could use to teach students about protesting and activism.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 07:33 PM
15

I don't understand why opening up a mens only lounge would not solve this issue. Then each gender would have their own lounge. For some reason this does not seam to be an acceptable solution to the university.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:42 PM
9

Suppose she didn't consider all the women who's votes didn't matter because the fix was in. Men's votes didn't matter either but don't think she cares about that.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 11:53 AM
1

“In a lot of ways my life continues in shambles,” she said. She has changed her PhD subject from women in prison to sexual assault. That seems fitting. Wonder if she was trying to find out what it is like for women in prison from a first hand experience and the plan backfired. Oh well she is making due with what she has got and all it cost her was the lively hood of an ex-boyfriend.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 03:55 PM
2

14 We get rejected constantly. The "whatever" youtube channel has covered this very well. Tinder Experiment: Men VS Women https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lY8rzo4Ik4M It is not just that it happens it can be how it happens. Rejection Experiment: Guys VS Girls https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmP1ier3R30
/r/MensRights13/07/16 12:50 PM
5

It is another example of social engineering push back. People are pushing back against social engineering in games, comics, and other areas where social engineering propaganda is being pushed. The mens rights movement is pushing back against social engineering that exploits gender dynamics where ever it is happening. There is overlap in all areas that social engineers are meddling in.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 12:29 PM
3

From your original post I thought that logic and facts presented had swayed your opinion. Have not see a case where that actually worked. It always seams to come down to life experience contradicting popular/feminist narrative that actually changes opinion. Always make sure there are others around to view arguments and let the viewers be the judge of the points being made as your not going to convince the person your arguing with.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 11:52 AM
3

It appears as though Warren Farrel is a long term supporter of Hillary Clinton. Regardless of how one may feel about this he has had very valuable things to say about mens issues. Even if he only repeats what he has said in the past I'm sure there will be people that will be hearing it for the first time which will make his contribution to the conference valuable.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 10:40 PM
1

Does "low-skilled job" mean physically dangerous jobs are disappearing? If so then the explanation is simple. The non-dangerous jobs are already being done by women and there is no other place for the men to go.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 02:19 AM
1

UTI: Treatments are usually done with readily available antibiotics. Any surgical cutting has a risk of infection. UTI is more common for females then for males and I have yet to hear about a campaign to go save the poor girls suffering from this issue, this suggests to me that on a world wide scale it is not a big problem. It would take some time to put the numbers but here is some raw data on UTI rates internationally. http://www.rightdiagnosis.com/u/urinary_tract_infections_child/stats-countr…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 02:24 AM
1

UTI: Urinary tract infections are easily treatable. Circumcision increases the chance of scar tissue infection. Places where male circumcision is rare to non-existent do not have a problem or high rate of male UTI. Circumcision causes a narrowing of the urethral opening either directly or through increased minor infection rates resulting in spray during urination and sometimes increased difficulty in emptying the bladder. In extreme cases circumcised infants that cannot drain their bladder devel…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 04:20 PM
13

female circumcision is, in general, worse than male circumcision This is very debatable. There are forms of female circumcision that are little more than ritual skin scrapings. There is no lasting physical evidence that a circumcision took place at all. There is no male comparison at this level. There are forms of circumcision that remove the prepuse. This amounts to conservative estimates of 9000 clitoral hood sexually sensitive nerve endings or 20000 foreskin sexually sensitive nerve endings b…
/r/MensRights19/06/16 09:37 PM
32

So straight white males are banned from lectures where they are told they are oppressive to all others and privileged above all others. I wouldn't want to go to one of these guilt trip lectures. I'm guessing that the lecture attendees will keep breaking down into smaller oppressed groups until divided they fall.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:14 PM
4

Yes there are a few white ribbon organizations. The .org website is linked with Erin Pizzey. http://whiteribbon.org/allbulletins/erin-pizzey-takes-control-of-whiteribbon-org/
/r/MensRights08/06/16 01:08 PM
3

Guessing you talking about http://whiteribbon.org/
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:37 PM
3

I was not aware that he is a long term Hillary Clinton supporter. That is a little more concerning and not just from a mens rights perspective. Have suspected for a long time that Hillary works mostly for the wealthy and not for the people.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 09:00 PM
5

From what I can tell he is picking what he sees as the lesser of two evils. The following is a quote in his own words. And yet, Farrell can’t fathom a Trump presidency, and says he “abhors” most of Trump’s policy positions. “I’d rather have somebody who doesn’t understand my issues who I believe will run a good economy, who I believe will be able to negotiate with the Mideast,” he said.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 06:23 PM
3

I don't know of any evidence one way or the other. Considering women seam to have a much narrower selection when picking males then men have when picking females I would think that many women cheating less frequently with fewer males who cheat more frequently is very possible.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:53 PM
2

If five women all cheat with one man then women are cheating at five time the rate of men. Unless you count each encounter as cheating then the man is cheating at five times the rate of the women. In both scenarios everybody has a "partner in crime".
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:02 PM
1

Looks to me like he is siding with what he sees as the lesser of two evils. I don't agree with him but he like every other US registered voting citizen is free to side with whomever they want. And yet, Farrell can’t fathom a Trump presidency, and says he “abhors” most of Trump’s policy positions. “I’d rather have somebody who doesn’t understand my issues who I believe will run a good economy, who I believe will be able to negotiate with the Mideast,” he said.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 02:07 PM
3

Today there cant be more than a few thousand women (at most) who were alive during the days of women not being able to vote. Female voting rights happened only a few years after male voting right happened. The timing varied based on the country. Before that voting was mostly based on property ownership and women could own property. Women never had any civil responsibilities or benefits tied to their voting right while men had the draft and other civil benefits tied with their voting rights. Mayb…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 01:07 PM
1

What is really amazing about this video is that the earnings distribution based on statistics from the 1970's match the earnings distribution that statistics are saying exist today. Really want to see numbers going back to the 1940's or earlier as I would not be all that surprised to find out they said the same thing back then too. Maybe someone who has access to old tax department data or census data can find such things.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 04:28 PM
1

Do you really think that female fashion models should have their pay cut in half or two-thirds in the name of pay equality with male fashion models?
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:47 PM
9

Beard taxes have happened many times the past. My understanding is that some upper class men would protest the tax by either shaving or growing a beard just to go against the way the tax was being applied at the time. My guess is that poor men would just do whatever cost less. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beard_tax Find it funny that the barber that proposed the tax says. He added: "I'm anti-beard really. I can't grow one to be honest - I get a bit of a goatee." That means the tax would never b…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:24 PM
1

I think it would be easier to show that men are being conditioned to avoid sex. Phrases like "no-means-no" "don't be that guy" that are very prevalent and are not pro-sex. Look at the outcome of the Ghomeshi trial or many other University/College rape cases where men had their education or jobs severely harmed. The prevalence of MGTOW should be good evidence that many men are deciding that avoiding sex is a good thing. Circumcision was developed as a way of slowing down the male sex drive. Most …
/r/MensRights10/05/16 02:05 PM
1

According to the CDC it is not really possible to say how common HPV is but they do think that it is one of the most common. Doctors typically don't report HPV incidents because it is not considered to be one of the more serious types of infections. Quote from CDC Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2014 http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats14/surv-2014-print.pdf Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States. Over 40 distinct types can infect the …
/r/MensRights23/04/16 07:22 PM
0

This is a testament to the marketing power of the vaccine industry. First the incidence rate of HPV is very low and the progression is very slow. If you are one of the unlucky few to get it the treatments are effective. This alone makes large scale prevention programs questionable. Putting money into making vehicles safer has prevented much more suffering then this vaccine could ever do simply due to the raw number of incidences. The above is assuming that the vaccine is actually effective and s…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:07 PM
1

This is a testament to the marketing power of the vaccine industry. First the incidence rate of HPV is very low and the progression is very slow. If you are one of the unlucky few to get it the treatments are effective. This alone makes large scale prevention programs questionable. Putting money into making vehicles safer has prevented much more suffering then this vaccine could ever do simply due to the raw number of incidences. The above is assuming that the vaccine is actually effective and s…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 03:26 PM
2

This is a testament to the marketing power of the vaccine industry. First the incidence rate of HPV is very low and the progression is very slow. If you are one of the unlucky few to get it the treatments are effective. This alone makes large scale prevention programs questionable. Putting money into making vehicles safer has prevented much more suffering then this vaccine could ever do simply due to the raw number of incidences. The above is assuming that the vaccine is actually effective and s…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:52 PM
1

Have heard that when it comes to human trial drug testing it is preferred to test on males. This is because there is no menstrual cycle to account for. This means shorter testing duration and complexity. In the vast majority of cases there is little difference in required dosage between genders.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 07:21 PM
1

The power structure that is feminism has proven to be very effective at shutting down dissenting opinions to the public opinion desired by that power structure. This opinion suppression model is currently being used against gamers. The gaming community is the first known group to push back against this pressure to conform. In some ways as a group they have been successful against this attempt at opinion control which is very unusual. The opinion forming tactics will continue but will not be as e…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:52 PM
1

Some interesting history. Not sure it is being correctly applied toward the end. The claim that when women overtake men in a profession the pay drops and when men overtake women in a profession the pay rises. While this may be true I'm guessing the number of women entering a given profession is a major factor in determining the supply of workers for that profession. Men just fill up whatever profession is currently lacking in supply of workers and pay may rise due to the lack of worker supply. I…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 10:06 PM
1

I'm a little surprised to see this article was written by a male. Suppose some men have become blind to the fact that males and females process emotions differently and that there is nothing wrong with that.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 12:50 PM
3

This looks like a call to women to raise male children to be white knights. There are many out there that think males always doing for others and especially females is right. Have found that never being selfish is unhealthy. It is a call to be unbalanced.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:16 PM
7

I actually have hope that he will go so far into misinformation feminist land that people will begin to see what is happening in terms of gender. There are many people that would never hear any facts we have to say but would hear the Canadian Prime Minister stating obviously false information. His overconfidence may be his weakness.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:58 PM
1

There is value in arguing if there are others around to see the points being made. Your not convincing the feminist your convincing those watching.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 10:41 PM
10

Actually the article covers that. Guimond-Bélanger said the debt still haunts homeless people even after they've managed to get themselves off the street. "When they don't pay for their tickets, there's a bailiff coming to their door."
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:26 PM
1

Saw him talking and found myself hoping he was just trying to weasel his way into the UN by saying what they want to hear. Found the thought that he might be being honest in his words a little more unsettling then the thought that he was being dishonest. Unfortunately I think he was being honest.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 12:30 AM
9

The US has some of the highest rates of circumcision and AIDS in the industrialized world. Circumcision does not prevent the transmission of AIDS. Shouldn't even have to mention the very flawed African studies. It is amazing to me that this myth exists.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 01:28 PM
9

Was in a room where a group of women that were children in the 1980's were reminiscing over childhood statements like "girl power" and "you go girl" and saying how silly they were. The men in the room were recalling "no means no" and similar demeaning or limiting comments. The promotion of girls and limiting of boys in popular culture is not new although there may be more of it now.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 05:52 PM
1

It does not say that there was no gender wage gap but it does suggest that men and women getting paid the same for the same work was accepted as normal. It is not a strong point and I think my memory inflated the significance a little. Hopefully there is stronger evidence out there.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:07 PM
2

Was the gender wage gap a real thing in the 1950's or was there just a bill passed in 1963 making it illegal? Considering there have been US politicians claiming that there is a wage gap today and trying to say we should do something about I find it possible the law was passed to solve a problem that didn't exist. Still looking for that article. Found article http://www.avoiceformen.com/series/unknown-history-of-misandry/the-dating-racket-and-its-heartless-robbers/
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:27 PM
2

Only 30 years ago. Lets go back 35 years to 1981 and see what they were saying about the "pay gap" back then. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUpgoayBPJc
/r/MensRights07/03/16 11:49 PM
3

What? Your not special because you fine with being circumcised. Your actually part of a large population of circumcised males. Don't think anyone is asking you to join any fight. What I am saying is that to learn about circumcision is an opportunity to gain insights about yourself in ways you are not likely to be currently aware of. Don't learn it for me or anyone else, do it for your own selfish reasons, or don't do it, makes no difference to me.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 03:25 AM
5

Good, glad that your happy with your body. Having said that it is a procedure I would not wish done to someone else. Part of the reason for providing circumcision information is so that people that are circumcised can come to know themselves better.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 02:52 AM
2

Thank you for this article. This adds a new angle that actually makes a lot of sense to me. It seams to line up with the MRI data that shows permanent change in the brain due to infant circumcision and a statistical correlation showing higher rates of autism among males circumcised as infants.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 01:47 AM
15

Was taught this behaviour as a child. It always bothered me that I was expected put extra effort into doing things for women and girls instead of just exchanging common courtesies with another human being. As a teenager if a female and I were passing through a door at the same time I would often have a subconscious negative reaction and did not know why at the time. There was even clear feelings of guilt if a woman ever held a door for me, even if I was carrying heavy things and my hands were no…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:39 PM
3

It would be a good idea to record your presentation. That way any misquotes or twisting of what was said during the presentation can be countered with evidence of what was actually said.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:08 PM
1

Recall hearing that an old meaning for the word 'boy' is servant or slave. This article would seam to suggest that is what is happening in Afghanistan.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 10:28 PM
1

As someone that has lived with dogs most of my life I can say that they can be great companions and enrich your life. Just know that we are still different species and you cannot provide all of the socialization that they need and they cannot provide all of the socialization you need. Two dogs sniffing each others butts or running together in a park, these are social elements humans cannot provide. Although dogs do communicate a great deal you cannot have a real conversation with a dog, well you…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 04:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter