TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

goodj1984 Archive

View 10 posts and 65 comments by goodj1984 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
69

goodj1984/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/20 10:29 AM
18

goodj1984/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/19 03:31 PM
14

goodj1984/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/18 06:28 PM
9

goodj1984/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/20 12:07 PM
9

Discussiongoodj1984/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 09:59 PM
7

goodj1984/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/19 05:53 AM
2

discussiongoodj1984/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/20 07:35 PM
1

goodj1984/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/20 10:51 AM
1

goodj1984/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/20 06:26 AM
1

Discussiongoodj1984/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 11:18 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

"Cold approach" itself is a relatively modern phenomenon tied to the rise of individualism, the decline in communities, and further reinforced by pick-up artists, not some eternal tradition. Young men today may indeed be averse to so-called cold approach, but what you may not have considered is that, even though many people today seem to have this image inside their heads, that men "back in the good ol' days" were bravely approaching random female strangers on the streets to court them left, rig…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 05:45 AM
2

Depends on what you mean by ‘pursue.’ On one hand, women weren’t nearly as passive or without agency in as some people today might assume, and one could argue that women today might in fact be more passive, not less. Courtship was almost always initiated through social networks—family, relatives, friends, and communities—often in communal settings like church gatherings, barn dances, or markets. Outside of these contexts, direct approaches were rare and generally considered inappropriate. Men ty…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/25 05:40 AM
2

I think I wasn’t being clear enough, I was pointing out that cold approaches have always been a strange and alien thing to most men ever since time immemorial (unless you count bridekidnapping like the legendary rape of Sabine women), and until mid 20th century the idea would be considered to be most bizarre - so it actually never was and never has been, despite constant attempts at shoving the notion down many men's throats. There is absolutely no evidence that most men, whether historically, o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/25 09:42 AM
26

Alex’s observation that many young men aren’t approaching random women may be accurate, but his premise and framing are deeply flawed, and as far as I am concerned, driven by a historically illiterate view of courtship norms. His argument seems rooted in the pervasive myth of the “good ol’ days,” when, supposedly, “men were men,” boldly approaching random women they don’t know in public to court them. However, this narrative has little basis in historical reality. If you’ve heard about Beth L. B…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/25 10:51 AM
6

Not the point, I know why women don’t, it’s simply the path of least resistance, and also partly because men in general are fairly hungry and desperate for sex, making passive idleness a perfectly rational behaviour - as long as you don’t mind having zero control over who gives you attention and being reliant on there being enough men continuing to perform the way you want. What’s with all ye internet feminists' fixation over this peculiar idea of personhood and your complex over your sex being …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 07:19 PM
6

That’s certainly another way of saying that the majority of women seldom even try to seek out men actively, let alone approach them, steadfastly clinging to the female human tradition of deferring the initiation of interactions to male humans as "their job" and continuing to passively wait for the offer, never questioning why it is that they themselves can’t give the offer or at least do something, even when young men are for whatever reason increasingly less keen on the whole idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 06:51 PM
2

And you know every single man on this earth? Spare me your own romantic-failures-inspired diatribe, darl, we are not you and your feckless friends' ex-boyfriends, nor did we make you choose those men, you in your own infinite wisdom did. Your own personal romantic failings is just that, yours, don’t try to conceal your own failures with this pathetic cope, you embarrassing sorry excuse of a spinster.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 08:09 AM
2

Henry George, the great man who continued and revitalized the long line of physiocratic-liberal tradition of advocating for the taxation of land rent (also known as land value tax) that has strangely been forgotten or ignored even by self-proclaimed liberals these days. His observation of the phenomenon of poverty increasing in affluent areas owing to the increasing land value that disproportionately if not exclusively benefited a select few, namely the landowning class, and that the remedy is t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/23 03:41 AM
7

Uncontrolled urban sprawl in the form of suburbanization without proper public infrastructures that rapidly transport people en masse, in addition to the uncritical lionization of the idea of multiculturalism as opposed to cultural assimilation (a multiracial and monocultural society is perfectly possible) into the majority's fold has been a total disaster, leading to a society where we all live in our own bubbles of asocial and segregated cliques of miserable solitudes. To tackle this, land val…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/23 12:10 PM
0

I’ll say this: the best revenge is to be unlike him who performed the injury, it’s better to not stoop to their level. You have no need to seek their approvals, but nor do you need to be angry or respond snidely to their curt words. Imagine being with such meddling weasels, are they not doing you a favour by letting you go? Them being as they are is already punishment enough, perhaps even to the point where one ought to instead pity them, methinks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 10:40 AM
4

I believe that Hans-Georg Moeller's characterization of what "wokeism" is, and by extension what feminism is, is on point: it is a civic religion that can be dangerously intolerant of criticisms, dogmatic, fanatical, and fundamentalist. That said I am somewhat sceptical of whether it is exclusively a result of hyper-individualism, as I reckon that some sections of "wokeism" and their feminist appendages don’t necessarily seem so individualist, but are merely incoherent followers of a kind of nar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/21 01:21 AM
5

I do think that a non-significant amount of those people who spout such talking points are in fact just misandrists and don’t truly care much for liberty nor equality except when superficially or cynically supporting policies that benefit their own special interests without regards as to whether it is at others' expense, however. I would go so far as to say they are not necessarily really either left or right, as their worldview are seldom coherent, almost seemingly combining the worst possible …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 06:36 PM
3

The same reasoning could also be used as a reason to attack all immigrants by the far-right (or even left-leaning racialists like the old guard Kemalists and Khmer Rouge), or to commit outright genocide against "undesirable" ethnic groups by empires, famous examples are everywhere in history: The Ottoman Empire who used Armenian resistance to the Ottoman oppression such as the fedayeen to excuse the Armenian genocide; Mustafa Kemal and his goons at the Grand National Assembly who used the former…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 06:27 PM
2

This seems to relate to the notion that the rise of "political correctness" (admittedly a dumb loaded term), or should I really say censoriousness, may have something to do with the increasing amount of women in Universities and even politics … If the theory is correct, then boy what we have seen so far would be nothing compared to what men in the coming years are going to endure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/21 02:41 PM
4

I once looked up a Scottish Gaelic folk song Fear a' Bhàta and came across the story behind it: a Scottish woman from the Outer Hebrides in the late 18th century wrote the song to a fisherman she was courting and ended up marrying him soon after composing it. I expected men back then to be doing all of the work in courtship more so than today (or braver in approaching women I suppose), yet here it is, a story about a woman from bloody 19th century in Outer Hebrides of all places writing a poem t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 04:21 AM
6

Because as far as I am concerned, it is the premise, the idea that most men are "creepy, clueless and dangerous" that is quite misandrist, not the conclusion that bad behaviours of men making it harder for other men to court women. I would also say the same for women: the shitty women make it harder for women in general.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/20 08:40 PM
6

I think it’s a fairly undisputed truism that ill-behaved men do damage the reputation of men, regardless if the majority of men do behave in a similar fashion, and might arouse suspicion amongst women, thus making it harder for men when courting women. Yet it is the premise that I see as borderline misandrist, as charitable as I try to be. The idea that the majority of men being creepy, clueless, and dangerous is simply absurd. Firstly, creepy is such a nebulous term that is really subjective to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/20 08:19 PM
4

The bloody Liberal government, as per usual, for all the lip service some of them occasionally pay to men and the rhetoric around "muh crazy lefty", in the end they embody both the worst stereotypically "left-wing" (Urban middle class Liberals like Gladys the Koala killer) and "right-wing" (mostly the more rural Queensland Liberal Nationals, Northern Territories Country Liberals) traits at the same time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/20 11:02 AM
1

Screenshot of the post as it’s removed: https://imgur.com/a/mJiVLnh
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/20 12:20 PM
1

Here is a screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/mJiVLnh Looking at the comments, quite a lot of them are fairly revealing too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/20 11:47 AM
2

It won’t if it should be instituted to replace (not necessarily completely but at least most of them) the myriad of existing and overlapping welfares from the state, including the American welfare programme that is social security, as in spite of their being better than having no safety net whatsoever they as a collective are very inefficient and take up a lot of taxes as well as time just in the administrative bureaucracy, and they also arguably hampers productivity by their nature of being con…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/20 07:05 PM
12

A superb and well-sourced post written by /u/mhandanna on how teachers are at best both literally and figuratively failing the boys whom they are entrusted to, or at worst arguably actively harming them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/20 11:13 PM
1

I thought this sub and that sub had a common origin or at least an overlap of userbase? Is there some kind of sectarian schism? 😅
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/20 09:57 PM
1

"they're as I said the Men's Judean Front, while Men's Lib are the Judean Men's Liberation Front?" Hahahahaha heel grappig Petje.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/20 09:55 PM
6

Also made me feel better about not liking to actively approaching and court women (especially strangers).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/20 04:30 PM
19

Woke journos, most of whom including this one in all likelihood are feminists, can apparently be this socially retarded, or at least have some serious issues with their resentment towards men if not outright misandry, such that this writer can frame and interpret a simple observation that the male sex deem making the women with whom they copulate orgasm a manly achievement as more about men caring about feeling manly than women's sexual satisfaction, almost in a way constructing a dichotomy and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/20 10:45 AM
3

I wouldn’t say r/ShitLiberalsSay are against all that intersectional/sjw stuff, if anything a lot of them sound very much like the ones at r/gamingcirclejerk, r/Gamerghazi, and r/ShitRedditSay. I’d argue that SJWs are an incoherent coalition of people who can’t easily fit into a neat bracket, be it liberal, or communist or whatever, some of them are supposedly liberals, others are socialists (including demsoc) or communists, social democrats, but really the way they act are often at worst highly…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/20 07:30 PM
2

It’s r/stupidpol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/20 07:16 PM
5

It’s even worse in Hong Kong, not only has it always been impossible for women to be prosecuted for rape against men, the laws around the age of consent and statory rape were modified in 2012 in such a bizarrely gynocentric way, that a 13 to 11 year-old boy and only him would be prosecuted for statutory rape (if consensual™) then be issued a life sentence for having sex with an underage girl; even if she were to be older not a thing would happen to her. The most batshit insane implication is tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/20 09:50 PM
1

Perhaps I should have been less mockingly flippant and lazy with my titling, fair enough. The name of Wuhan Coronavirus is merely the most logical name seeing as it’s the bleeding origin of the plague, however much the Chinese Communist Party want us to forget about this very fact and get all butthurt about their losing face over this pandemic of their doing. A broken clock, including Trump, is right twice a day. Regardless if you agree with that name, one cannot deny the absurd framing of girls…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 04:24 AM
11

I don’t think either r/GenderCritical or r/FemaleDatingStrategy necessarily hate sex-workers nor women who sleep with men as soon as they’ve gone out once. My personal theory is that these women and feminists (or quite a lot of them) merely have an insurmountable resentment towards men, though hard as they may try to hide or sugarcoat it, it inevitably rears its ugly head, hence their resentment towards any women whom they deem to have made it "too easy" or otherwise advantaging the cursed men/e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/20 07:30 AM
2

Wow that’s quite bad, although I personally think conscription isn’t necessarily a bad thing provided if the conscripts are well compensated and if it provides good job opportunities or pathways thereto, or even just skills; but sounds like the Austrian system doesn’t do much of the above. How do the Austrian media in general and the political parties represented in the parliament stand on these Austrian men’s issues you mentioned?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/20 09:17 AM
5

......and then they wonder why women can’t find men "good enough" (earning as much as they’re making or more)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/20 11:36 PM
0

The tragedy is there may well be many-a-simp here desperate and naive enough to provide.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/03/20 03:57 AM
6

Go be a simp and get this golden sheila her citizenship m8. /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/03/20 03:44 AM
1

Some kind of Latin American/Middle Easterner trying to get to Straya? Just tell her ‘fuck off we‘re full’ if you want to mess with her. 🤡
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/03/20 03:42 AM
3

There’s a theory that I’ve heard that the drop in testosterone may have something to do with the female birth-control pills’ contents entering the water system after being expelled from the users...... though there’s no definitive prove as of yet, methinks. Female birth-control pills may well be both a blessing and a curse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/19 03:33 AM
11

Not necessarily hypergamy, methinks, but with the inability to adjust their hypergamic standard to one that fits the reality, as well as promiscuity in general, and maybe the over-reliance of physical attractiveness in determining the viability of mate even though personalities often better predict the stability of relationships for both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 03:32 PM
12

Only if he abolishes a lot of the existing wildly inefficient and bureaucratic welfares by replacing them with UBI.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 03:27 PM
1

Okay commie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/19 12:05 PM
1

He’s a far-leftist, socialists and communists don’t own the left mate, unless your definition of the left is built around marxist aligned ideologies and exclude social democrats, liberals, or other miscellaneous leftist who are nothing like the breadtube types like him. I’m disputing much of his definition of alt-right, nevermind his unfairly lumping of the right-wing together or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/19 12:00 PM
3

Innuendo Studios is honestly one of the worst - not only with his maliciously disingenuous usage of the label of alt-right, targeting not just actual white supremacists, which he in fact spends quite a lot less time on, but conservatives, or “radical conservatives” (an oxymoron), and the Christian Right. Now many including myself may not like them (or at least a good number of them), and for good reasons, that however doesn’t mean they are alt-right, something that this slanderous hack doesn’t s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/19 04:10 AM
1

I reckon the reason why certain women could act in such despicable manner is at least in part because men essentially let them get away with it by not ignoring/shunning them. At this point I’d say men should devote little to no energy and time in pursuing women, or at the very least don’t pursue women too much - that would help a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 03:29 AM
3

You sound more like some kind of anarcho-communist/anarcho-syndicalist/whatever kinds of anarchist than an actual liberal - maybe to an American anything left is liberal, but left doesn’t mean liberal. If your idea of what feminism is, merely means free choice for women in regards to their mate, at least in the west that’s the overwhelming norm supported by most, and we’d almost all be “feminist”. Your presuppositions are at best dubious. How on earth has men ever been guaranteed a mate/wife he …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 07:54 PM
3

Social democracies are always capitalist. Social programmes don’t make a country any more socialist, socializing the means of production does.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 06:57 PM
3

Can I have the transcript of the sentence (specifically “God damn your sister’s pussy’s father”) please?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/18 01:52 AM
1

The fact that men and women are not the same is quite an indisputable fact well accepted by mainstream academics, though that doesn’t mean men and women don’t have massive similarity - it’s the same bleeding species after all - that said small similarities do manifest in the tail ends, which is why there’s such a thing as the greater male variability hypothesis based on the fact that male are more variable in intelligence, that there are more male imbeciles and geniuses, but go on and ignore thi…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/10/18 05:48 PM
1

Except I’m no conservative, thank you very much.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/10/18 02:15 PM
1

Making it political, perhaps in a way that those r/masstagger fellows don’t agree with, doesn’t make one an “Alt-Reich”, nor harmful - unlike fancying oneself a mind reader by boiling it all down to “bad faith” or whatever ill-intents in such a self-righteous way. So long as the tag list includes r/kotakuinaction, r/JordanPeterson (say what you want about them, but they are not “Alt-Reich”), and even r/Drama which laughs across left and right (e.g. MDEfugees), instead of just actual Alt-Right/ N…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/18 10:24 PM
0

*and played soggy biscuits
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/18 04:17 AM
2

I just like you username that’s all.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/18 01:48 PM
1

good grief this username ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
/r/PussyPassDenied28/08/18 11:18 PM
2

Same as the taste she got in her mouth after she had gotten that job with Barnett? 🌝
/r/PussyPassDenied28/08/18 11:09 PM
100

It’s nothing but a short shitty clip, assuming if it’s even her
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/18 07:16 PM
61

I seem to have come across it, not sure if it’s actually her......
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/18 07:02 PM
14

Which is also why Hawking was able to have a few more tumbles and a bun in the oven whilst already on the onset of his disease. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/18 04:12 AM
2

In my view, red-pill is just an extremely cynical observation of the indulgence of women (and the society for that matter) in the fantasy of a sheltered 13-year-old girl. “Unwanted sexual attention/advances should be regulated and cat-call should be illegal” “Women should be protected from all the harmful effects of the casual sexual intercourses they willingly indulged in.” “A man should be bold enough to come up to talk to me after recognising all the subtle but obvious™ (meaning invisible) hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/18 07:27 AM
5

Except feminists had in fact little influence on women’s liberation. Women’s liberation was mainly because of the invention of birth control pills, the great wars, liberal political reforms towards universal suffrage, and has little to do with the agitations of scums like Norah Elam, nor Luce Irigaray, nor Andrea Dworkin.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/18 06:31 AM
1

Embrace feminism? What kind of feminism? The kind that somehow makes men and women lose the part of their sexual instincts that causes hypergamy? I’d rather die alone than to become a pathetic weasel of a male feminist rapist. Unless men could collectively start having some higher standards and don’t oversupply, have some self-restrain (with the help of Mrs Palmer and her five daughters) and don’t give in so easily, there’s nothing we could do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 04:51 PM
1

Just look at the fact that we, mankind, have more female ancestors than male ancestors - far more women were able to procreate with a mate, all the while being on average more choosy than men (not that there’s anything wrong with being choosy), possibly with males of relatively high status, whilst a lot of males (probably of lower status) were often unable to. Make no mistake, men are just as deeply complicit in this pain-in-the-arse (just look at the *moaning of female university graduates in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 04:37 PM
1

more like an old construct/adaption that has long become almost instinctual
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 04:19 PM
1

Unfortunately far too often men just don’t have enough self-respect, self-restrain and dignity to stand their ground, maintain a standard that isn’t too low, not act desperately or too agreeably to women, which in the end just devalues themselves, thus allowing them to be taken advantage of by unworthies and ingrates. (yes I am a man and I do think that far too many men act in a way that devalues us in regards to companionship or sexuality)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/18 08:37 PM
3

just don’t expect and wait for it to happen on you, you’d most likely just die alone
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 11:06 PM
2

It’s almost as if she’s wilfully ignorant of how much effort and resources men have paid in order just to have a chance (not even guaranteed) of convincing a woman to give him the love, intimacy, and children his instincts tells him he should pursue.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 05:51 PM
2

I’d say it’s more accurate to say that women have considered their sexual value (I assume that’s what you meant by self-worth?) to be tied to their ability to men who she considers worthy (in wealth, status, charm, temperament, etc.) to actively court her, the more men the better. With that put aside, I have to ask you where did you come up with the idea that marriage in its current form in most modern developed countries gives vastly more benefit to men than to women and that men have much leve…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 05:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter