| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | "Death to men" banners and graffiti, 8th of March 2019, SpainJust because a small group of people (or one person) thought the banner was ok doesn’t make what he said acceptable | /r/MensRights | 09/03/19 03:31 AM |
| 4 | "Death to men" banners and graffiti, 8th of March 2019, SpainDamn dude wtf | /r/MensRights | 09/03/19 02:48 AM |
| 1 | Imagine if it was dads instead of momsI wish I slept 10 hours last night | /r/MensRights | 16/09/18 08:19 PM |
| 1 | A user on /r/MGTOW got fired from his job and finds out that no employer will hire him because of a PO filed by his wife. He makes a good bye post around a month ago. I am crying uncontrollably.I use the desktop site on mobile and have gotten used to zooming in to tap on things (or just being accurate) ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | /r/MensRights | 26/03/18 02:22 AM |
| -4 | A user on /r/MGTOW got fired from his job and finds out that no employer will hire him because of a PO filed by his wife. He makes a good bye post around a month ago. I am crying uncontrollably.There's this thing called "zooming in" that mobile users can use all the time. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/18 05:52 PM |
| 1 | Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than womenBecause if "men make 75% less than women", we're using the women's pay to be the given value and the men's pay to be the value we're figuring out using our conversion. A better comparison is this: B is men, A is women. if A = 1.75 * B (aka 75% more), then B cannot be equal to 0.25 * A. The truth is B = A/1.75, or B = A*0.571 | /r/MensRights | 09/02/18 09:43 PM |
| 6 | Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than womenNo. Women get paid 75% MORE than men. So for every 100, they get 175. If men were getting paid 75% less than women(meaning 25% of what women earned), going off of the same 175 number, it’d be $43.75. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/18 12:38 AM |
| 7 | How false accusations destroy livesThe law system can be easily manipulated by demagoguery. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/17 03:43 PM |
| -11 | And Jake. Both of them were in the same situation.Well yeah I never said it was perfect. I was explaining how their logic works. Their logic: A person who is drunk is responsible for any crimes they commit. A person who is drunk is also not able to consent. Therefore, the drunk person seen as more powerful (in almost all cases the male for some reason) is seen as the perpetrator. I personally think it's really difficult to LEGALLY prove stuff like this (rape vs. not rape) if they want to keep the whole "drunk people can't consent" laws until ev… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 05:07 PM |
| -11 | And Jake. Both of them were in the same situation.The policy is that when you're drunk you're still responsible for your actions. I kinda agree. I'm not saying the system works perfectly, but the way a drunk person acts is semi-representative of their sober thoughts. (Note: I have never been drunk so I may be wrong. I just feel that rude/obnoxious people are more likely to be rude/obnoxious while drunk than a regularly caring person.) | /r/MensRights | 21/08/17 04:55 PM |
| 2 | We are fighting a losing war against family violence until society withdraws permission from women to hit their intimate partners.We need to do a 2-prop z-test to see if the data is statistically significant in proving that female-perpetrated violence is higher than male-perpetrated violence. (It's a statistics thing and I miss my statistics class, don't judge) | /r/MensRights | 26/02/17 04:32 AM |
| 1 | "beside" them? I had to say something.I think there are a great deal of women that would love to serve their country by risking their lives. It would probably be less, but nationalism is something that affects both genders. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/17 12:27 AM |
| 1 | "beside" them? I had to say something.My main point was that many people in this sub look at stupid arguments made by dumb feminazis and then assume that the entire movement is stupid and none of it makes sense. We need to respect our opponents or else we just come off as offended, misogynistic men who want to hold on to the power that some of these feminists feel we have. If we fight fire with fire, we end up burning the innocent. Being dicks only makes the problems worse. (This is something that also goes to some feminists) | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 06:13 PM |
| -2 | "beside" them? I had to say something.I mean it would be really hard for anyone to make a distinction, there's arguments for either side. It's not cut-and-dry "death is worse" or "rape is worse". | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 01:48 PM |
| 3 | "beside" them? I had to say something.I'm sure many people would choose death instead of rape | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 12:31 PM |
| 20 | "beside" them? I had to say something.This comment is extremely hateful. I'm all for equality and men's rights but it feels like you're belittling the entire feminist movement even though some of it (not necessarily the war aspect) is actually true/justified. Life isn't just an internet flame war. Edit: I'm also sure that there are worse comments somewhere so don't take this personally. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 12:19 PM |
| 15 | "beside" them? I had to say something.I can't believe what you just said. Obviously they're really close, and both things suck, but if you die a swift death it's much better than being tortured/raped and seeing your village, life, and reality coming to the end. If you're a machine with no emotions, dying is much worse than being raped, but if you're a normal human being (which I hope you are), then something akin to becoming property and having your family slaughtered while you have to live on, can fuck you up. I'm not arguing that … | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 12:15 PM |
| 1 | For school I had to create a poster on a cause we're passionate about. I did mine on domestic violence against men.Data analysis such as this can never be truly accurate. The margin of error here is huge, but basically this is the statistic because they use a 95% confidence interval, meaning that according to the data they received, 95% of the time, their data will show an average that is between 40% and 70%. It's a safety net because you can never be too sure. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/16 01:42 PM |
| 1 | For school I had to create a poster on a cause we're passionate about. I did mine on domestic violence against men.95% confidence interval? | /r/MensRights | 04/10/16 01:37 PM |
| 8 | SJW harrasses a very patient Lyft driverThis is disgusting | /r/MensRights | 04/09/16 05:06 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter