~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | A 31-year-old woman sleeps with and gets pregnant by a 13-year-old boy... and faces zero jail time.Thanks. And I really don’t disagree with you. I was simply stating that 31 and 13 is a very different situation to 19 and 17. I absolutely agree that many Americans have insane views on this. I am from Europe and our age of consent almost universally across the continent is 16. Even then, no one would would jump on an 18 year old with a 15 year old, for example. 18 as the age of consent is nonsensical to me, as is having such rigid, unwavering rules surrounding it. I will say that I was looking … | /r/MensRights | 08/03/23 03:02 PM |
| 3 | A 31-year-old woman sleeps with and gets pregnant by a 13-year-old boy... and faces zero jail time.Autism, so probably quite a bit. Having said that, you are the one who has had the misunderstanding here. I was not talking about Frank. I was talking about your initial hypothetical scenario, which was ridiculous. I thought that was clear considering I mentioned ‘19 and 17’, which were not the ages in Frank’s case. In addition, I used the phrase ‘THAT 19 year old’ vs ‘A 19 year old’, to convey that it was specific to that scenario. Nonetheless, I hope that has clarified things. Have a good one | /r/MensRights | 08/03/23 07:14 AM |
| 4 | A 31-year-old woman sleeps with and gets pregnant by a 13-year-old boy... and faces zero jail time.Mate, 31 and 13 is extremely different to 19 and 17. Nobody would look to criminalise that 19 year old. There is nuance to be had | /r/MensRights | 07/03/23 06:03 PM |
| 5 | Do you think the system is bound to collapse?Appreciate it mate, I’m not against you. I also apologise for misunderstanding you and quite possibly taking you too literally in terms of your question. You make a good point that even some very wealthy people do not have many kids. Of course some may just not want a big family, but even anecdotally from people I work for I have noticed many financially comfortable people only have 1-2 children. As I said, lots of people simply don’t want a big family, but the general rise against it surely doe… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/23 08:39 AM |
| 3 | Do you think the system is bound to collapse?No, it was not supposed to be a “gotcha”. I wasn’t even arguing with you lmao. You are correct that money (or lack thereof) does not stop the physical creation of children. Obviously. I was merely listing the reasons for high birth rates (since you asked) and was implying that they don’t have kids whilst being in poverty because that’s a good environment to raise a child in, but because they lack education, resources, have ulterior motives, etc. Children in poverty suffer greatly and that has wi… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/23 08:19 AM |
| 6 | Do you think the system is bound to collapse?They have high birth rates because of poor education, poor access to contraceptives, culture regarding large families as the norm, women generally not working so are able to look after the kids full time, wanting kids for labour | /r/MensRights | 05/03/23 07:52 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter