TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gooooooons Archive

View 0 posts and 62 comments by gooooooons on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Very much. And I'm aware that's not what you said, I'm just making assumptions based on the angry outcry here and the tendency of MRAs to be armchair activists.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:31 PM
0

Yeah he kinda did, when he said "the issues of half the population" But be semantic some more why don't you! Prove something to me about how MRAs argue on the internet over pedantic issues when someone disagrees with a pretty blatant "we represent the interests of half the population" statement.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:18 PM
2

Haha sharp increase. So, basically what you're telling me is that some of the MRAs who used to sit on their asses and do literally nothing but bitch on the internet have been angered enough to do something about it in the wake of the SPLC. How long you think that's going to last, Elam? How long before the rage is forgotten and you all sink back into your lonely computer caves hugging your fleshlights?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:17 PM
6

Where will you get people to participate in your creepy e-stalking now? QQ
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:47 AM
0

I'm sorry, you I didn't mean him specifically, I meant the MRM.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 05:46 AM
-1

I like how you think you represent anything like half the population. That's pretty funny. Hint: Most men aren't bitter assholes who feel the need to identify a segment of the population not them and blame them for their issues.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 03:31 AM
-9

Keep trying to convince yourself that everyone laughing at you is only doing it out of desperation. Keep trying to convince yourselves you're worth engaging in open debate. Personally, I've tried. There's not a one of you who isn't too stupid, dense, immature, and full of confirmation bias to actually listen long enough to realize that your entire worldview is predicated on falsehoods and bullshit.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 05:54 PM
-10

Hyperbole is the idea that being labled a hate group could do anything but bring you negative attention which will ensure that your "movement" continues to consist of nothing but delusional bitter omega personality types who seek to blame the world for problems they'd have to leave the house and get off the computer in order to actually have in the first place.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 05:46 PM
-16

Yes, demonspawn. A sleeping giant is waking up to MRM. I'm waiting with baited breath to see if it squashes you flat, or just dismisses you as not worth bothering with in the first place.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:28 AM
-2

I don't really participate in SRS much, I'm just sympathetic to the Gynocracy of the Fempire.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:03 AM
0

COMRADE OF THE FEMPIRE!
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:55 AM
-1

Dude I knew that the second I saw you are an MRA.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:49 AM
3

She's...SHE'S ALREADY HERE?!
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:11 AM
-2

Haha "boys" "No more sexual harassment" "Won't someone please think of the free speech rights of the children!"
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:07 AM
11

This is simultaneously the stupidest and most hilarious incarnation of misogynistic propaganda I've ever witnessed.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 12:18 AM
0

No, you don't. But that's OK, because if enough people point it out maybe it will sink in some day. I'm fine just being one nail in the coffin instead of the whole thing.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 01:25 AM
-1

and?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 01:24 AM
-2

You keep talking but all I hear is "blah blah blah here's another stupid opinion supported by ignorant uneducated bullshit" Did you really just say falsifiable? You started off with "dogma" and now you're asking me if we can prove male gaze through scientific experimentation? Do you know anything about psychology, at all? Do you think the term "sociopath" or "Antisocial personality disorder" is provable through scientific experimentation? Or do you think that they are terms used by those in the …
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:58 AM
-2

Ahh, and here we get to the point where anything that is a part of feminism is defined as "rad fem" so that you can pretend that it's all radical and crazy and such. You got anything other than various forms of ad homenim, or you ready to offer some kind of perspective on why guy produced media who's primary demographic is guys does not slant severely towards guy perspectives? I'm getting kind of tired of "If I call what he's saying this it lets me pretend I have grounds to dismiss and ignore wh…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:07 AM
-2

I'm fully aware of where it comes from. The point is that it's a term which is not from or about art history and is concerned with the psychology behind points of view which create art. Good job jumping on wikipedia to try to make an argument though! It's a step up from talking out your ass.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 08:05 AM
-4

No I think you're in the habit of making shit up, believing anything told to you by someone who shares your perspectives, and using words like "dogma" to dismiss anything which contradicts your confirmation bias based worldview.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 08:01 AM
-4

Hahaha you think Male Gaze came from Art history. It's a psychology term, idiot. I think my favorite part about this post is that you have not, not once, actually said anything which in any way refutes what I've posted. You simply insulted me back (and by imitating me, no less. Do you not even have the mental acuity to be original?) and claimed that my argument was "poorly worded" which is not even synonymous with "incorrect" which further proves that either you don't know what the fuck you're t…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 06:27 AM
-3

I've always wondered something about people who post stupid shit like this. Do you actually think you know what you're talking about, or do you admit to yourself that you're talking out your ass because you don't want to be wrong on the internet? Do you pretend to know what you're talking about all the time or just online?
/r/MensRights27/02/12 06:01 AM
-5

No. Basically, a large number of things are made for men and by men and subject to the perspectives of men, and the effects that these perspectives have on the works which are then created is known as male gaze. Do you usually make stupid generalizations about complex concepts you aren't educated on?
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:37 AM
-5

This is alot of words to say you don't understand what the fuck you're talking about. First off, Fabio is not the end all be all of hyper masculinity and in fact despite the muscles he is purposefully cast as a man with feminine qualities (long hair, lack of chest hair or facial hair and other typically masculine qualities, etc) and is used to represent characters in books who are not hypermasculine as you would consider zangief to be. You also do not know about/understand the concept of male ga…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 02:55 AM
-5

Why do you think I care what you think I think? I was just pointing out that you're an idiot, it's not like I'm surprised that you'd take that in stride. Idiots generally do.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:53 AM
-2

By the way, I sourced this all the way back. It goes back to Reuters which is quoting a study done by a life insurance company. One study, by a life insurance company. Fair to say that that's not anything like a reliable academic source and the study is a prediction not a statement of statistical fact. Your source is bullshit which you googled or were linked to by some other idiot who's just as intellectually lazy as you are.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:47 AM
-4

Because your spouse is totally a trend, or representative of the sum of the experiences of women in the corporate world :rolleyes:
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:39 AM
2

To be fair, this got linked on SA and we're asking ourselves if it's one of us too. No one has come forward yet to claim credit though, so it still could be real.
/r/seduction17/02/12 05:05 PM
2

Add me to your collection please.
/r/seduction16/02/12 02:27 AM
2

Best gimmick account ever.
/r/seduction15/02/12 02:41 PM
1

You cannot be proven not guilty to anything. Not guilty is a verdict which simply means there is not enough evidence to convict without a reasonable doubt, which is an entirely subjective idea. Being found not guilty also does not mean the accusation was false.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 12:11 AM
16

Why are all of you so up in arms about sex and consent when it's completely obvious from your posting that none of you are having any anyway? The risk to you if women reported 100% of sex as rape if you have 0 sex is still 0.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 10:59 PM
13

Shitthatneverhappened.txt
/r/seduction25/12/11 05:16 AM
1

If you're 41 and still referring to women as HBs you're pretty much hopelessly fucked. You should be interested in women within about 10 years of your age and every woman 30 and over is going to be looking for a man with a more mature outlook on life than you currently have. You're asking a collection of mostly under 30 year old guys who have little ability to get into and maintain serious relationships (because of a lack of experience) how to meet women who would never give them the time of day…
/r/seduction22/12/11 07:49 PM
0

Hmm. Alot of forums posts. One news story which can be vetted as absolutely factual. Two additional reported cases where consensual sex was justification for accepting the responsibility of parenthood and nothing changed just because there was a statutory age gap which are unsourced. So, you've proved that a minimum of one and a maximum of three teenaged guys have had rulings which determined that a statuatory age difference was not protection from the consequences of sex which in each case was …
/r/MensRights21/12/11 03:00 AM
-2

Prove it with something other than your own ignorant, biased opinion or a quote from False Rape Society.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 11:44 PM
5

Your posting is proof that people were smarter back then.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 01:09 PM
3

I'm a dude and you cannot have a single bite of my pie. If you ask for one I have every right to tell you to go to hell. If you try to take one I will bitch slap you upside the head and then wave my pie in your face and laugh while eating a slice because fuck you it's my pie.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 02:41 PM
-2

I find it hard to believe that any woman demands, expects, or even wants anything from you.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 02:24 AM
2

I resent the implication that, as a guy, women dressing in any way has any effect on me that I don't want it to have. I'm so goddamn sick of stupid ass worthless jackasses making the rest of us guys look bad by basically advancing the argument "I'm a dumb beast who isn't in full control of my actions or thoughts, I have drives I simply cannot and will not ignore, so don't wear anything revealing around me or I might assault or rape someone purely by accident, and it'll be your fault when I do!" …
/r/MensRights02/11/11 07:07 AM
3

Lord...lord lord. Not the population boom coming, you idiot, the one that's already happened. You are literally scapegoating single mothers on assistance (a much lower percentage of the population than you assert there must be in order to actively cause societal collapse) for the effects caused by the gutting of the middle class. Do you know nothing about economics? The loss of the tax base is a direct result of the homogenization of labor in the US and the conversion of said labor from skilled …
/r/MensRights09/10/11 07:37 AM
1

You are truly a brick wall without any understanding of any of the many topics you draw from to make your stupid arguments. I would bet you've never read a decent article about economics or the many social issues you seem to think you're educated on, much less a book written by a credible author. I can just see it now. In about 40 years this country is going to be in trouble because the middle class is disintegrating due to corporatist politics. Medicare and social security spending is going to …
/r/MensRights09/10/11 06:33 AM
8

Wow. The egocentrism required to believe that women not sleeping with you caused a global recession is so staggering it almost fits the psychological definition of pathology. The way you see the world around you from your basement is classic, because you see yourself as part of this disenfranchised majority rather than part of a really shitty, really small minority of men who are flat out just not worth getting to know and who thus languish in obscurity and get together and bitch about it on the…
/r/MensRights08/10/11 11:28 PM
1

Ahahahaha right on the fucking head man.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 11:18 PM
50

So what's it like to look down on people from the very middle of the bell curve?
/r/MensRights23/09/11 05:01 PM
2

Ugh. Hyperbolic hypothetical situations created to mock the viewpoints of others by going the opposite direction to a similar extreme are not hypocritical, you retarded manbaby.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 09:55 PM
2

"Tips on how to bring our her inner whore without treating her like one would be appreciated." You just did, so you know.
/r/seduction18/09/11 07:54 PM
3

The point isn't that you have to know her BAC. The point is that we know what her BAC was and it was far beyond the point of being functional and obviously sober enough to consent. The problem only arises when your perspective is the opposite of "err on the side of caution" and instead you approach these situations thinking "So exactly how drunk is she allowed to be before I'm in danger of not getting legal consent"
/r/MensRights18/09/11 07:35 PM
3

Yeah, there is a double standard. It's arisen because of a variety of factors surrounding the entire issue and it's history, and it's not something that's easy to balance with fairness distributed to both sides. But this isn't one of those cases where two people had a few drinks and made a bad decision. She was black out drunk, based on both testimony and BAC. He was clearly not. The onus was on him to step back and he did not. He got his dick wet instead. If the situation had been reversed she …
/r/MensRights18/09/11 07:23 PM
9

You've never been around many blackout drunks before, have you? Someone pushing .18 and above does not appear sober to everyone else, this is literally the stupidest argument you could have made. .08 is the legal limit for a reason, the average person begins to show significant signs of inebriation and loss of ability to do things like control a car. At .13 the next morning her BAC was more than double that at the time she was raped, and you want to tell me "well she probably appeared sober". Yo…
/r/MensRights18/09/11 07:02 PM
2

You are retarded. He's not a rapist because he's rich, he's a rapist because he had sex with a woman he barely knew who was incredibly intoxicated at a time when she was legally unable to consent. As to the rest, I was lampooning the guy I was responding to's assertion that this girl is just "another lush who can't drink responsibly" which is a complete assumption on all of your parts which you all make without thinking because any girl who gets drunk and ends up in bed with a guy without active…
/r/MensRights18/09/11 06:52 PM
0

People who are so drunk that they cannot legally give consent who have other people who are more sober have sex with them are raped. You should read the laws, it's kinda down on the books in the state this happened in.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 06:38 PM
-4

You're an idiot. Now, you've had your "she just gets drunk and fucks someone" hypothetical, let me give you mine. The prosecutor just let a rapist walk free because he's a rich brat who's parents can afford Notre Dame and a decent lawyer. You can even go so far as to assume that someone has some influence with the prosecutor, whether it be the lawyer or the family of the rapist. We can assume this because Indiana law states that rape occurs when one person has sex with another person when consen…
/r/MensRights18/09/11 01:52 PM
1

And maybe he shouldn't have been having sex with a woman with a .13 BAC. I like how you assume she has a tendency of fucking people when she's drunk because that's what it takes to fit this into your stupid little just world fallacy where drunk girls never get taken advantage of and always consent. If she had a .13 when police tested her that means it was probably a good bit higher before she passed out for the night. A good bit higher than .13 isn't a competent tipsy person who's fully capable …
/r/MensRights18/09/11 09:50 AM
-1

Some people just exude creepy. Their body language makes what they're doing, how they're enjoying it, etc loud and clear. You know, when a girl wears a low cut shirt anyone who's into girls is going to glance. It's a natural human reaction. It's the guy who leers with that little smile on his face that says "you are a sex object that turns me on" that skeevs people the fuck out. You're making a big assumption about multiple people in favor of the guy filming to say that he didn't throw off some …
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:40 PM
-2

When you're standing within 15 feet of someone with center frame pointed at her crotch, it's pretty obvious what you're filming. Also, thank you for fulfilling my expectation of replying with "if you don't want to be filmed don't do things in public". Sorry, but even someone doing some sort of performance has the right to expect people to not be fucking creepy about it. If it were some girl filming bulges and getting called out this forum would be screaming about objectification of men and how w…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 03:24 PM
0

Wow. You are just full of flat out false information aren't you? Did you really bring up government contracts? 95% of the money our government pays in contracts go to businesses owned and operated by white males. The AIG bailouts went directly into the pockets of white males. The people running GM into the ground even now that our government had to bail it out to keep it from going under are still white males. The majority executive level members of companies in the US are white males. Are there…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 03:18 PM
-4

Yeah guys, that explains perfectly why before he gets called out you've got plenty of shots where the center of the frame is focused on her ass and crotch and you cannot see her head at all. It's ogling through a camera. "Oh but she was wearing skimpy clothes she was asking for it" and "It's in public, no harm's being done" doesn't really make the creepy ass "I have rights to video tape in public" greasy sounding douche behind the camera sound any better. You don't have to violate a law to be a …
/r/MensRights15/09/11 02:57 PM
5

You say this like you have to wait. It's more like poking your head outside to see if it's raining and drowning in the two seconds you spend looking up.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:24 PM
3

You should probably edit your post to explain in detail exactly what all these expectations you have are, why the three week girl wasn't meeting them, and precisely what "high standards" are in regards to your dating life.
/r/seduction08/09/11 01:05 AM
-1

Posting in SRS is not inciting a downvote brigade, it's not like I care about voting or encouraged anyone to do it at any point in time. It amazes me how you manage to jump onto my posts and delete them but leave the heavy misogyny and other more...disturbing...posts alone until rage is incited. And, history? It's funny how even the unbalanced members who I openly mock are more willing to allow discussion than you. Next time you want to reply to something someone posts you really shouldn't delet…
/r/seduction01/09/11 05:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter