TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gordonnowak Archive

View 0 posts and 133 comments by gordonnowak on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

mate I think you live in a media bubble
/r/MensRights02/08/26 02:55 AM
1

it depends on the time horizon. if a woman is looking to hook up height near the top along with other more immediate signal. if they're looking for a long term relationship obviously the criteria change.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 06:52 PM
-25

look I'm all for observing cultural overcorrections but this is fucking nonsense. the vast majority of modern media is male focused.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 04:25 AM
92

there was a post on r/college lamenting the loss of women's only scholarships. most people were very upset. they will bring up the disparities within majors, but as you say, no one ever thinks about men's scholarships generally, nor when it's the other way around. it's gotten to the point now where they have to confront the hypocrisy or they will just look stupid to everyone and themselves
/r/MensRights28/07/26 01:57 AM
6

you should focus on making ADHD not detract from your own life. the rest will follow. weird way to frame the question
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 07:59 PM
–

why are you so mad
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 09:44 PM
3

there's a world of difference between withholding information and saying "I'm not trans" when you are. not knowing which you're talking about I couldn't say anything concrete. if the former, no one is entitled to any information, and if I never asked I wouldn't have any claim to injury if it turned out it mattered to me whether or not someone was trans vs. born female (and it does matter to me, sorry). if I asked, and they lied, that's a uniquely vicious untruth IMO. there is just clearly a diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 10:37 AM
3

I think this is a lot more difficult than you're making it out to be. it seems like it should be clear but it really isn't. if you ask me my name, and I lie about it, that's a thing that happened. If the thing that I lied about (my name) became a contingent part of your consent, that is you agree to have sex with someone because, or partly because, their name is X, but it isn't actually X, there's some reasonable discussion one could have about a failure of informed consent, but I don't think yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 10:31 AM
2

for me to agree it was a double standard, I'd have to agree that lying about your name and lying about your sex are the same thing. I don't think they are
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 10:20 AM
–

how could a person possibly know that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 10:07 AM
–

I don't think either of those people should go to jail. I also don't seem them as equivalent falsehoods, and that's probably where this conversation ends.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 10:07 AM
–

so if my name was Bill and I said my name was Chad, consent becomes impossible at that point?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 09:53 AM
–

ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 09:52 AM
–

men lying about what? "even if it wasn’t something agreed upon" - is the ask that we enumerate the whole interaction beforehand, or at each stage, or something else?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 09:44 AM
–

you can't wield an anecdote and say something like "men want different rules for themselves." there's literally nothing to argue with there. I could just as easily say all women want puffy pink pillows. and it would be just as relevant to the discussion
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 09:44 AM
–

"I'm interested in what it takes to be a mechanic." "OK, that might take a while because there's a lot. But do you actually want to be a mechanic, or just tell yourself you are a mechanic?" are you fully online?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 09:32 AM
–

"Make sure her consent is informed" - what does this mean? this is dangerously vague. if I say something like, "are you OK with this? do you want to continue?" seems not to pass your bar. "create the circumstances whereby she knows she can withdraw her consent at any time." - in what situations would she not be able to withdraw consent? like don't handcuff her to the bed, or is it way more subtle than that? the tension I'm gesturing at is that women perceive stuff that men don't. (in general, pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 09:29 AM
–

what the literal fuck are you going on about?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 09:26 AM
–

it's absolutely not rare. women are suddenly aware of the power they have to penalize men socially when they feel like it. that doesn't mean they're having men thrown in jail at will, but they will start rumors, make anonymous (or not anonymous) posts on social media, etc. they do this with total impunity, and they've co-opted a really important sociocultural moment where real women victims of sexual violence were being heard for the first time into this huge and asymmetrical social gender war. …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:36 AM
–

uh oh! you might have assaulted them and should probably go to jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:29 AM
–

what point do you think you're making here because I'm not even sure if you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:28 AM
–

what?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:27 AM
–

everything you've ever said to a potential partner was the perfect and verifiable truth?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:04 AM
–

what the fuck do you think "invalidation of consent" implies? so if I tell a woman I'm 6'4" when I'm only 6'3", I should be put on a sex offenders list? women are insane
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:03 AM
–

"I feel regret" being reconstructed into "I was assaulted" is now just a generally available chemical pathway. Women use it. A person who feels ill-treated can feel ill-treated, a person with regret can feel regret. Recategorizing these things as assault for the purpose of inflicting social harm as retribution is terrible and needs to stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:03 AM
–

If I ask for consent and the woman says "yes," what are you saying my responsibilities are? what does due diligence look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:00 AM
6

no you haven't. this is fucking made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 10:17 AM
0

the grain of truth here is that the asymmetry in demand especially in online dating apps damages incentives for women to treat men well. the rest of it is kind of loony tunes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 07:36 PM
1

they are absolutely attracted to the guy. women are attracted to status cues, and one of the most visible and effective is wealth. men dating intra-class is more to do with the rule of similarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 01:14 AM
-1

she's not. she's reporting something she perceives, which is a projection
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:46 AM
-2

it literally does
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:36 AM
1

what?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:26 AM
-2

wealth is an extraordinarily weak influence on men's attraction. this is backed up by mountains of evidence. you're projecting, and that's ok. women are allowed to be attracted to money
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:26 AM
-4

men could not possibly care less about the money a woman has or doesn't have
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:13 AM
6

my wife isn't
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 04:02 AM
2

lots of men don't think women are capable of rational thinking with respect to attraction, but it's part of the whole model. feeling safe with someone is one of those foundational things that must be true for anything else to be true. weirdos exist, that doesn't mean much
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 08:00 AM
3

I've had more meaningful conversations with my pet turtle
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 06:53 AM
3

I match energies habibi
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 06:21 AM
0

read my comment in that thread again; notably the 4th and 5th sentences. if you can make it that far :)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 02:06 AM
4

you are not firing on all cylinders are you
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:41 PM
6

like neil the seal? awesome "I constantly see" is pure anecdote. I don't take people seriously who cherish their own anecdotes like they have any real meaning
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:09 PM
8

are there rules against posting ranting bullshit with no sources and no intention of engaging in good faith conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:38 PM
3

I don't understand what you're trying to say like you're using words but put together, I'm not sure it means anything
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 09:28 PM
2

it's not a matter of admitting or not admitting it; many have literally no idea how their brains even work.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 07:34 PM
0

"Funny how the women who prefer those “dark triad” traits always seem to have those traits themselves." no one said that. why do you think this?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 07:23 PM
1

"dark triad" traits are measurably more attractive to women. the summary is that self-interest is, maybe counter-intuitively, hot. that doesn't mean that women literally want "bad men," but that the common archetype conflates those traits with criminality, insubordination, etc. that said, it's never a good idea to extrapolate from a personal anecdote. just in general, don't do that. "I've never heard my female friends or seen online discussions where women fantasize about kind, genuinely good ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 07:23 PM
1

women can't figure out the difference between two groups?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 08:06 AM
3

maybe I don't understand redpill very well but I don't think those things are related. red pill is mostly observations about patterns in female mate selection and prescriptive optimizations. the correlation between men who are red pill and men whose sociopolitical beliefs are problematic in the way you describe is high but that doesn't make them the same thing. like I don't see why a belief in hypergamy deterministically predicts a belief about reproductive rights. the "they" you're talking abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 10:20 PM
–

I have good news
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 12:23 AM
–

because men don't choose, women choose
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:16 PM
–

i'm not really interested in this. I get the heeby-jeebies from people who make statistical arguments out of thin air.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:35 AM
–

i'm not complaining, and that's not what I said. what a weird conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:06 AM
–

I think as much as you're saying that men as a class are unworthy of sexual consideration because they are, what seems to either mean on average or in some kind of large majority, incapable, incompetent, disorganized, lazy and assholes is total fucking nonsense and not worth engaging with. That's just clear misandry and smacks of some bias from personal experience. good arguments don't come from anecdotes. More than that you're having an argument with no one. I don't think men are owed sex at al…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 01:04 AM
–

I don't really care either way; I think what's useful to emphasize is the asymmetry here. basically every woman who has responded to my (somewhat sarcastic) comment paints men as hobbled, generally unpleasant and inadequate. that's the starting point for your thinking about men as a class. the argument isn't that you are obligated into sex when you don't want it. there isn't an argument. it's an observation about the asymmetry.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:30 AM
–

Women need to satisfy their partner (though it goes both ways, of course). If they don't, why would their husbands want to stay married to them? Chores need to be done, appointments need to be made, and bills need to be paid. If the husband has to be the only one thinking of these thing (because she can't rely on her wife to do anything without being told), how is he gonna clear his head enough to enjoy the experience? Like, women are idiots if they think they can be lazy bitches while also havi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:10 AM
–

men must constantly perform and facilitate for women to earn sex, in other words
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:04 PM
17

it depends on the partners, I don't think there is one formula. I make more than my wife but I agreed to be the "primary" parent (whether that meant stay at home or some kind of WFH-part time hybrid) for personal and philosophical reasons. if I tried to simply deliver the argument that she should because she made less, it wouldn't work as well for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 08:36 AM
-12

1 in 9 american men are violent offenders. that's either low or high depending on your perspective.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 05:44 AM
0

you're an idiot
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:11 AM
4

human rights are human rights. you're asking for special rights that subvert the intent and meaning of existing laws and customs. trans people exist and deserve compassion but many of the things we're being asked to consider (ie trans women in women's sports, gendered privacy areas) are genuinely non-obvious problems. do you think people trying to earnestly understand the issues and not just capitulate to moral outrage immediately are worth engaging with in good faith or just nah
/r/MensRights27/06/26 03:27 AM
4

an inability to attract LITERALLY ANY WOMEN is 10000% bad personality bad person != bad personality. definition problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 06:50 PM
1

you aren't no pill are you
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 11:11 PM
10

who the fuck is akash singh
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 10:46 PM
15

when I was young and dating there was a often a discrepancy between who I was with and who I really wanted. then I met my wife and she wasn't remotely what I imagined for myself but it all totally collapsed and I feel lucky every day. and maybe that's unusual, I don't know. that said, people are fantasists by nature. there's always something going on in someone's own private world. don't trouble yourself about it unless it infringes on reality
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 08:19 AM
4

there's a psychological and a physical element. the psychological one is the socialized idea that big dicks are a status symbol. it's no more or less boring than that. it works on them the same way it does on us. the physical one varies massively. anatomies are sufficiently different that one woman (probably very few) might like cervix pounding and others (the vast majority) don't. the important nerve endings are near the "entrance" and girth is more important. you can supply "artificial" girth …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 07:41 AM
–

this doesn't refute anything except that status can be a very local/cultural phenomenon. I don't know what else it could possibly be. there's no real or fake status, there's just locally important status. women will emphasize prestige in domains that interest them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 01:52 AM
3

While pretty girls, indeed, they can be cheated on, but not by girls prettier than them. categorically untrue
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 07:56 AM
3

on average, you're right, there is a massive asymmetry. but the same extremes exist in both camps
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 12:34 AM
3

I haven't had success in dating, and I'm cool with that. no you're not lol this is the most bitter post I've ever seen
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 08:34 PM
3

that means you just categorically suck as a person then. congrats?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:00 AM
10

women categorically don't want to be abused, so nothing else needs to be said about your position. vomit up the black pill or get out of here. sounds like you have no idea what words mean
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 01:51 AM
2

that has literally nothing to do with what I said
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 12:58 AM
4

quantifying semantics matter. 1 in 9 men are violent offenders, which is kind of a lot from a certain point of view. it's also not most, nor is it all. so if you said "men are dangerous" to mean "most men or all men are dangerous" you'd be wrong and it's not pleasant to be accused of being evil by default. you could say 1 in 9 men are violent offenders and that's pretty wild. and I sincerely doubt that most men would be upset by that because it's a specific enough quantification that it doesn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 12:54 AM
5

when a class exists you are allowed to talk about averages and majorities and bell curves. for example the question "are most cars white" has an answer that isn't "all cars are different" aRe YoU ComPaRiNg WomEn To CaRs yes i am I don't want a woman who gets less than 35mpg highway
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 12:45 AM
7

there is a clear tendency of evaluating men based on how well they can divine a woman's needs without communication.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 10:24 PM
7

none of the things you said are contradictory
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 10:18 AM
7

don't engage with them. they are going to dig at you until they find something they can use to hate themselves with. its like self flagellation, they get off on it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 09:34 AM
8

this is just total nonsense. you want it to be true so that you can justify hating yourself because it's a pleasurable kind of masochism. straight weirdos
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 09:34 AM
15

talking with *cels is like talking to malfunctioning LLMs at this point. best of luck to you
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 09:32 AM
14

what do you think the intent of those DMs is? however you explain that asymmetry, and its definitely real, doesn't mean those women aren't lonely, and genuinely, viscerally so.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 09:10 AM
3

sounds pretty familiar
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 09:09 AM
18

go to r/trueuglywomen - it's a mirror image of male incels. there is a dimension of their experience which is real, in the sense that they are genuinely "lonely". I don't know if you're trying to argue that on average men are more lonely than women, but I think its demonstrably false that "women" (as a class? specific women? what?) don't know what "real" (??) loneliness is. that said the sub is a dirty cesspool of manhate and externalized self loathing. they're just as bad as incels
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 08:44 AM
7

I'm starting to think you'd do it for free
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 03:45 AM
2

are you from Germany?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 03:44 AM
7

some people are different from you. first day on earth?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:39 AM
6

sorry but getting fucked in the ass is not a psychological triviality. it's not the same thing as mowing the lawn and I said this elsewhere but if it isn't innately clear why I'm not sure what to tell you
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:07 AM
14

I think if it's not immediately and viscerally obvious why those things are different me explaining it won't help. glad you have that as an option for yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:05 AM
6

no, because fuck that if I were in financial distress I'd have to work my way down an extraordinarily long list of remedies before I got there and I'd still probably take homelessness over it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:40 AM
11

not that complicated. the universality of social media has changed interpersonal standards. women as the gatekeepers have had their preferences mutated by social media such that reality is no longer interesting. add the risk in being socially outgoing now is enormous
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 06:40 PM
–

overlapping bell curves means saying "more x do y" is the least charitable possible way to present an idea. they could overlap but for literally one person and you would already not be making the point you think you're making, like not even remotely close. this is beyond you but maybe someone else reading this can figure it out. it's false because it's false. we're lucky that we are able to settle these things with research generally, so we don't have to yield to randoms on forums with "mod" tag…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:37 AM
5

to simplify for you i'll quote you directly. The issue is a lot of what men want or what would “improve their mental health” comes down to “feeling like a man” which somehow always involves someone else (male or female) being dominated, subjugated, possessed a possession of his, or in a deferential role so the man feels like he’s lording over something (or sexually validated/satisfied). this is false. thanks and let me know if you have any other questions
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:33 AM
3

women shouldn't do anything in particular except whatever is in their best interest. it is a fact of dimorphism that they are the selective party. that plays out however it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:25 AM
9

"more males than females crave possessing others" is just rotted out romantasy brain. also, google overlapping bell curves. male status seeking is absolutely real. describing that as a totalizing claim about men wanting dominance in the sense of interpersonal subjugation is fucking nonsense. like easily verifiable nonsense. the internet exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:23 AM
13

which somehow always involves someone else (male or female) being dominated, subjugated, possessed, or in a deferential role so the man feels like he’s lording over something (or sexually validated/satisfied) this is the exact bullshit that pollutes the discourse. men want to be self possessed and successful. they want to be important, yes, but modern sociality is more about prestige than dominance. that's such a fucking archaic and self-serving way to read male psychology generally, and you jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 12:55 AM
1

read the root comment I replied to. surely you know what words mean
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:44 PM
12

I think you're asking for something more concrete than can be given. It's a sort of ambient feeling of disinterest, suspicion and antagonism towards them as a group. Most of it doesn't come from political entities but social spaces/online. Men are treated in their basic instincts as morally suspect and that they must be treated with contempt by default, and must earn social and institutional inclusion with significant often self-undermining moral effort (think the meme: all men must start in pri…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:37 PM
1

absolutely core to what is being discussed. need to define success. boot up those brain cells
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:16 PM
0

"morally speaking" we have largely moved on from this, catch up when you can
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:16 PM
1

I like mine better
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 07:04 PM
–

are you trying to make a point or what? "WOULD YOU LIKE AIDS??" no man I wouldn't. next question
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:00 AM
2

"You say that like the divorce rate isn't close to 50%. Chubby agreeable dude isn't guaranteed a happy ending either." - this doesn't control for anything. maybe there is a cohort of men that succeed with significantly more stable marriages, and the average is dragged down by "criminals" I honestly have no idea how to respond to your hypothetical. it's weirdly contrived. if that resulted in a lasting and positive relationship, I don't see why not, but I'm sure that's not what you meant to show.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 11:50 PM
-1

which is better
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 09:34 PM
2

I don't grant there is such a thing as "success with women in a normal sense." You decided it meant something like "has the most babies," and to me it means "has the most enduring relationships." which is the normal sense
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 05:59 PM
1

This study found narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism correlated with short-term mating dimensions, not long-term mating, with the link stronger for men. Criminal records can reduce women’s dating interest. Formerly incarcerated men show worse marriage outcomes. if you want to take a narrow definition of success and pick a few studies, you can say whatever you want really if you want to know who, scientifically speaking, has the most unambiguous success with women, its slightly overweig…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 05:43 PM
-2

literally cannot find a single one, unless you're conflating "actual criminality" with vaguely dark traits. also; wrong flair buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 06:35 AM
-4

Criminals are more successful with women than non criminals. absolute organic grass fed nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 03:48 AM
2

they don't mean anything in particular. if q is "being abusive," the calculus just says that x y and z net the whole thing positive. it's a really gruesome and reductionist way to say it. having read your OP more closely, it's a really weird question that's difficult to answer on its face. women want two things: status and investment. you're failing at one or both of those things, in all of their myriad expressions. abusers aren't winning, and they aren't carrying important signal that you despe…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 02:21 AM
4

it's an unfortunate correlation. lots of theorizing gets confused by correlations - women like x, y and z, but those traits correlate strongly with q. q is bad, but x y and z are the real hooks. women really genuinely dislike q; but q is the cost of getting x y and z. and, as it turns out, men without q are largely deficient in x y and z. not for any particular reason, and not universally, they just don't correlate often.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 01:51 AM
1

this is a crude way of saying it but it's not far off the real truth
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 01:49 AM
4

oh jesus I didn't realize it was you. got me again
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 11:55 PM
6

absolute fucking nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 11:41 PM
4

the point is sexual compatibility not infinite availability, this is stupid either way
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 10:29 PM
1

what the literal fuck are you going on about
/r/MensRights31/05/26 07:57 PM
-2

what a weird comment. feminists take bimodal attraction, cut it in half and run with investment. zero of them signify status as primary. and "masculine behavior values" is a totally opaque statement that almost certainly means status cues lol. read a book or?
/r/MensRights31/05/26 04:52 AM
57

quick point, status is not secondary to masculinity. it's absolutely primary.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 12:15 AM
–

because it seems self-contradictory, but it isn't. they're attracted essentially to two things: status and investment. they very rarely correlate so everyone gets confused
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 01:36 AM
0

women are attracted to status cues and investment. those things correlate very rarely, so everyone gets confused
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:13 AM
0

I'm sure this question is asked in good faith /s
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 06:19 PM
3

where will the goalposts go next
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 04:57 AM
2

I have no clue and I doubt there's any reliable data. dr. emily nagoski has done some work on this, maybe she could be a source of more information
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 03:47 AM
2

you can establish sexual compatibility before marriage. it's not "immediately have sex with random people" or "wait until marriage". that ignores a lot of important relationship modes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:08 AM
2

some women feel attraction more quickly and with less context so are more amenable to hookups. many women don't do hookups because it would be absurd for them to feel attracted to someone you just met and know essentially nothing about.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:07 AM
9

a functioning adult should probably be able to intuit that reciprocal sexual pleasure is the baseline without being told. did you miss that part?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 01:55 AM
9

to me it seems like having to be told that mutual orgasm is a reasonable minimum is fucking weird. yes women don't communicate about it well for a lot of reasons. but why should they have to
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 01:38 AM
4

you think women don't do this? they literally do not, and there's a reason why; it breaks the idealization mechanism. if they have to ask, it undermines the moment. now SHOULD they have to ask? absolutely not.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 01:37 AM
1

nothing is universal. this is all patterns of behavior. imagine how poorly the "average" person describes every single person. lots of women still do hookups because they get something out of it, computed against the risks. some women are less responsive in their desire
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 01:23 AM
2

pregnancy risk, patterns of dissatisfaction (one night stands are disproportionately configured for men's pleasure, ie orgasm gap), social stigma, but the big one is that they are just fundamentally less interested in that kind of entanglement.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 01:00 AM
13

that's one reason they do casual hook ups less than men but it's far from the only one
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 11:12 PM
–

having more options is necessarily better
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 01:38 AM
–

people change don't be a wuss about it
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 08:21 PM
10

usual suspects
/r/MensRights07/05/26 10:56 PM
3

I think there's a read that charisma is necessarily aggressive so it's on an axis with being "nice" which they conflate with obsequiousness. in other words they're incel idiots who know nothing about how people work
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 01:14 AM
10

so in your view being nice is mutually exclusive with being charismatic and funny? you can be all three. and being less of any of them is strictly worse. big brain boy over here
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 01:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter