gorjusgeorgus Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Supreme Court Bars Gender Bias In Citizenship For Kids Of Unwed Parents		gorjusgeorgus	/r/MensRights	13/06/17 10:01 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	She ignored the quarantine in a tourist resort. She will face serious penalty fee and charges. Los Cristianos in Tenerife. My mate is there a few doors down from this and his video ended up in the Mirror	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/03/20 07:04 AM
1	In U.K women will only be jailed for serious crimes. This is pure discrimination against men, and a double standard based purely on sexism. What can we as citizens do about this? there must be something we can do about it? Got a source on this statement?	/r/MensRights	16/07/18 03:33 PM
0	Went exactly as expected Which country are you talking about? Forced to join in what sense?	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 12:53 PM
1	European Court of Human Rights finds that accusing people on social media of sexual crimes without proof or conviction is an Article 8 violation and that European states have a duty to take action against it. Of course it is. In the UK this would be covered by defamation law.	/r/MensRights	21/01/18 11:19 PM
1	UK: Woman who made a series of unfounded sex abuse allegations about her ex-partner is now barred from seeing her four-year-old daughter But in that case he would have been the accused, I assume ? The law only protects the accuser from identification.	/r/MensRights	01/01/18 05:41 PM
-4	UK: Woman who made a series of unfounded sex abuse allegations about her ex-partner is now barred from seeing her four-year-old daughter Have you got any articles for reference?	/r/MensRights	01/01/18 05:26 PM
17	UK: Woman who made a series of unfounded sex abuse allegations about her ex-partner is now barred from seeing her four-year-old daughter Sexual Offences Act 1992: Section 1: (1)Where an allegation has been made that an offence to which this Act applies has been committed against a person, neither the name nor address, and no still or moving picture, of that person shall during that person’s lifetime— (a)be published in England and Wales in a written publication available to the public; or (b)be included in a relevant programme for reception in England and Wales,if it is likely to lead members of the public to identify that person…	/r/MensRights	01/01/18 04:46 PM
8	UK: Woman who made a series of unfounded sex abuse allegations about her ex-partner is now barred from seeing her four-year-old daughter It's because she's made an allegation of rape, it has nought to do with gender. If a man made the same false allegation, they would be unable to report his identity too. People who make Sexual Assault allegations have guaranteed lifetime anonymity in the UK.	/r/MensRights	01/01/18 04:09 PM
1	It's okay to publish photos of the victim, as long as they are men. POST COMMENT WRITING EDIT: There's a lot to answer in your comment and I've done my very best to hit the main points but I'm sorry if I haven't. I hope what I've written makes sense. Okay, let me offer some clarity on what I mean. The names of people who make an allegation of rape are always protected in English media. You can read more here: http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/never-assume-you-can-safely-name-a-sexual-offence-victim-even-if-you-believe-the-law-is-on-your-side/. This anonymity continu…	/r/MensRights	22/12/17 09:05 PM
1	It's okay to publish photos of the victim, as long as they are men. Look, I'm not advocating anything. Perhaps I over spoke regarding protection. I was trying to give my slightly educated view that this is not as easy for the English press as it may appear. We don't have the same system as the states, court reporting in the UK can be very difficult, especially with regards to sex offences. Regardless of the ethics of what should or should not be done, this is probably why her name hasn't been given, and I highly doubt many media outlets will want to risk it.	/r/MensRights	22/12/17 04:29 PM
0	It's okay to publish photos of the victim, as long as they are men. That's not true in English law. Rape case victims have lifelong anonymity.	/r/MensRights	22/12/17 03:05 PM
-2	It's okay to publish photos of the victim, as long as they are men. The media are not allowed to publish any information regarding the victim in a rape case, except the gender and age. As long as it remains a rape case, this will be always the case. Additionally, you want to be careful how you phrase your argument because that protection is vital and should not change. However, I assume that a new criminal case opens to prosecute the offender. In which case, it might be plausible that the original 'victim' could be revealed, but it would have to be done in a way…	/r/MensRights	22/12/17 01:19 PM
5	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Which is silly because Paul expressly prohibits it.	/r/MensRights	06/11/17 06:52 PM
5	Since colon cancer is more than ten times more likely to be diagnosed in men that cervical cancer in women, I decided to complain to the NHS about it, let's see if I get a response. Is that true? I’m pretty sure I’ve seen prostate cancer pamphlets. Obviously you can’t prove the negative but... I’m pretty sure the information is out there...	/r/MensRights	22/10/17 09:21 PM