grambino Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	So sad I totally get your misunderstanding. I was speaking on OJ's legal guilt, whereas you're speaking on his factual guilt/innocence. My opinion on his factual guilt notwithstanding, I think it's a good thing he was found not guilty. A prosecution should not get a conviction when they present such a sloppy case.	/r/MensRights	11/03/19 10:14 PM
1	So sad It's interesting that you think the legal system operates on binary, not sure where you got that understanding from. Do you think that OJ was proven innocent of murder because of his not guilty verdict? How was he then also found liable for the same crimes in a civil suit? He was already "proven innocent" at that point, according to your logic. This law firm's website can explain it for you. Or this article from the AP. Or this piece from the National Constitution Center. They all say the same t…	/r/MensRights	07/03/19 08:49 PM
-4	So sad In the United States that means he is innocent of the charges. No it does not. It means a jury of his peers found that there was reasonable doubt as to his guilt. He was found not guilty. No one in the United States is found "Innocent" by a jury at the end of a trial. Edit: Y'all got any facts to go with those downvotes, or is it just more important to you to feel right than to actually be right?	/r/MensRights	07/03/19 05:55 PM