TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

grandaddychimp Archive

View 5 posts and 454 comments by grandaddychimp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And yet people still cling to what they know. Until they don't anymore. Chrysler failed in the 70s and got bailed out, then GM failed in 2008 and got bailed out. Two well known car brands that wouldn't exist today if not for the federal government bailing them out. Monopolies are not created or maintained by natural market forces. A simple one - how likely are "you with a good idea and 100k dollars in the bank" be a competition for them? You won't be, not unless you go to VC and ask them for 100…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 07:48 PM
1

IOW, they had the federal laws that established said welfare programs. Table 1 at the end of the PDF lists 10 states that provided state-level funds, rest of them provided county level, which for the purpose of the discussion makes little difference as both examples pertain to funds given from government to individual. I'm not 100% sure how the states and counties get their money, but I'm PRETTY sure majority of their funds comes from taxes in one form or another. Nothing in your source says any…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 07:15 PM
1

They do more often than not. Thanks to the state assisting them. Lower price and better product is not enough. It's theoretically sound, but in practice most people stick to what they know and not to what is best. What you described does happen, but only in "technologically advanced" markets, not with generic products. That can only work for so long before their quality drops or their prices get too high. They have to maintain quality and/or low prices in order to compete unless the state is pro…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 04:25 PM
1

...except the guy who gets the largest market share and uses his money and influence to stifle competition in any way it can. Hence the anti-trust and anti-monopoly laws that the state enforces. Your argument is circular. "Any way he can" includes using state regulations to either benefit himself or harm his competitors. That includes anti trust laws. Quote from your link, pretty much sums the debate up, albeit without realizing it: These economists, blinded by bad science, simply do not underst…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 03:50 PM
2

http://www.econ.yale.edu/~cmm54/americanwelfare1004.pdf Page 4. Your source says nothing about federal welfare. IOW they we're not nationalized even when at the edge of failing. The three examples I gave were nationalized. Nor the government wanted to. You just made 2 statements, one disproves the other, yet you still stand by the disproven one. That's called holding frame I guess :D How does one disprove the other?
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 03:41 PM
1

39/50 US states had federal welfare for single mothers since 1919. Do you have a source for this. Women got votes in 1920. FRD reforms of Great Depression extended the welfare on other categories. While women are not blameless when it comes to being on welfare, them getting votes has noting to do with how welfare for single mothers started I agree women aren't entirely responsible because beta cuckolds also teamed up with the women to make it possible. I'm pretty sure you consider most of what h…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/17 07:41 PM
1

My bad. http://archive.is/CvNSz The point of government is not to create competition but to prevent the leaders of the market from stifling the rise of competition in a way that breaks the free market rules. Hence the multitude of anti-trust and anti-monopoly laws. The free market has no rules. It is anarchy. No entity can prevent the rise of competition except through the state. Why the anti-monopoly laws then? Why the blocking of mergers? If state really supported monopolies it should encourag…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/17 07:22 PM
1

Give some examples or some sources that contain meaningful example of that happening ("mostly used"). http://archive.is/You That contradicts logic as governments are the only institutions that enforce anti-trust and competition laws. No, competition is inherently created by the free market. Government is a monopoly on power and thus it cannot logically create competition anywhere else, it can only create other monopolies - and it does so by restricting competition. This is demonstrated by the fa…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/17 03:31 PM
1

It helps her do it more efficiently though. I can agree with that, but I also have to add that it's not a by design, b/c design would assume someone who came up with welfare understood female sexual strategy and female agency, which is highly doubtful. The voters are the ones who put the politicians in who created the welfare state. It was only about 15 years after women gained the right to vote that the federal government began creating the welfare state. It may not have been consciously design…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/17 03:03 PM
1

I admit I'm getting a bit lost in your train of thought. On on hand you are aware that AF/BB is the natural order of things, on another you have a problem that third wave feminism lies to them that pursuing it will make them happy. What's your end goal here? You want women not to pursue AF/BB? That's not going to happen, EVER, not even Muslims with stoning can put a stop to it. There was no end goal of that sentence. All I was saying is that feminism sold women the lie that it will make them hap…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 08:36 PM
1

Great, now name a country that still uses gold and silver as their common currency and name why they don't. Be my guest. What about the anti-trust and anti-monopoly regulations? How foes free market capitalism (and competition) fare without them? Anti-trust and anti-monopoly regulations are mostly used by large corporations against smaller businesses. There is no evidence in recorded history of any monopoly being created that wasn't due to some governemnt regulation that benefitted the entity in…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 08:02 PM
1

Name a non fiat currency that didn't. Gold and silver There are no interests converging when it comes to corporations and socialism. It's mixing water and fire. Wrong. Free market capitalism is the enemy of corporatism because it levels the playing field and large corporations don't get subsidies, tax breaks, bailouts, or any other special regulations written in their favor to kill their competition.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 07:49 PM
2

That's not the lie of feminism, that's what they've been doing anyway, since it's in their biology. AF/BB. Their biology isn't consciously telling them that's what will make them happy. Third wave feminism is though. It's not there to make them happy. That's BP thinking. It's there to propagate her genes. Straw man. I never said their inherent nature is there to make them happy. We had nuclear families for centuries, most men grew up to be betas and BPs. Most men have always been betas and BP's.…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 07:46 PM
2

She doesn't need feminism to do that, she never did. In fact she did that for last few hundred thousand years. It helps her do it more efficiently though. Getting on welfare and finding a beta provider Same goes for anyone else. Why should I pay for anyone's healthcare, education or birth control? Because the govt will kidnap you at gunpoint and throw you in a cage if you refuse to I assume that if it was not capitalism, then it must have been a socialism? Started closer to capitalism and progre…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 07:37 PM
1

You're the only person who is talking about a conspiracy theory. I'm not. You don't need a formal conspiracy when interests converge. So why the fuck do you make predictions if you "don't know" Because every fiat currency in history has eventually failed (been reduced to their real value of zero). They've either been revalued, destroyed by military occupation/liberation, renamed for political reasons, converted to another currency, or hyperinflated. There's nothing special about the Federal Rese…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 07:27 PM
-1

My bad, what I wanted to say is "majority of conspiratards doesn't understand how money is created.". That I can prove. So yeah, the fiat money have no apparent real value, but that doesn't make it a "fake" currency or one specifically designed to scam the population that uses it. That's the "conspiracy theory" that conspiratards repeat endlessly and the one that I war referring to. My bad for not being clear enough. The problem stems from not understanding how it's created and from the misunder…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 06:48 PM
1

Feminism also sold them the lie that riding the CC and settling down with a beta will make them happy. Women pursuing their inherent nature will not make them happy. Hypergamy demands that they are never happy or satisfied. Women don't know what will make them happy because nothing will. The only thing that will maximize a woman's happiness is if she locks down committment from an alpha who, for the duration of the relationship, she feels is the highest quality male she can get. In order to achi…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 06:16 PM
2

With the help of beta men they certainly are
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 06:04 PM
0

That's not true. You can't prove that. It's a popular conspiracy theory b/c majority of population doesn't understand how money is created. Fiat currencies having a real value of zero is a fact, not a "conspiracy theory". Solid info. When? If the Federal Reserve Note hyperinflating is the catalyst for a world currency being issued, then soon after that.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 05:55 PM
2

Centralized power is collapsing all around us, because it provides less and less benefit to the majority of people every year. Brexit, Trump and Catalonia are just the beginning. I guarantee you that in five years, the US government and EU will collect a larger percentage of revenue as a percent of GDP than they are now, and everybody will have less Liberty. Why would I bother with trading if I can make anything I want myself? Yes, there'll be a bit of trading going on, for the few things people…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 05:52 PM
6

Feminism didn't develop any sexual strategy for her. Yes it did. "Vote for feminism and you'll be able to ride the CC with alphas and be provided for" is absolutely a sexual strategy for women. ...is almost verbatim a description of AF/BB - the "natural" sexual strategy of a woman. The only thing modern culture did is to allow woman to shed the patriarchal traditions and return to almost natural, instinctual AF/BB. Also notice "modern culture" and not "feminism". Feminism fights with imaginary o…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 05:46 PM
0

But that's no longer the case: centralization of power is an impediment to growing wealth in a post-industrial world, so power is going to decentralize. Except that's not the trend we are going in. Power is slowly becoming more centralized. As for 'legal tender', what value does money have in a world where I can make everything I want myself from raw materials I collected myself? You're stuck in an industrial-era mindset, like 99.9% of the planet's population, when the industrial era was just a …
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 05:29 PM
0

The currencies they are using are fiat, and thus will eventually be reduced to their real value of zero. The Federal Reserve Note hyperinflating would have catastrophic consequences for the global economy. The World Bank will issue a single fiat world currency to end the depression as quickly as possible, and all governments will gladly accept it and force it on their people as legal tender.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 05:24 PM
2

They're not legal tender, therefore any contracts that attempt to use them as tender in transactions are illegal and will be thrown out of court.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 05:19 PM
-1

Why would anyone want to be told what to do by idiots thousands of miles away elected by billions of idiots even further away, Change 'billions' to 'millions' and you can ask the exact same thing about the US. Globalism has peaked. The future is nationalism, then tribalism. Nothing can stop it, because the only alternative is complete social collapse that takes us direct to tribalism, without passing Go and collecting $200 on the way. No amount of nationalism can stop economic reality. The Feder…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 04:59 PM
-10

Until it runs out of money and then tribalism takes over. That won't be a concern for long. Someday we will have a democratic global government that will issue a single fiat currency that will replace all national currencies, and private competing currencies will be illegal. The state will be able to slowly inflate away the currency to pay for everything, forever.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 03:52 PM
1

This is exactly why no man should use social media unless you're a celebrity. It is primarily a tool for women to receive attention and validation from other women and betas who are 'liking' and commenting on every single post. Using social media pulls you into a woman's frame. It also eliminates any mystery that a female hamster could cook up about you, because all she has to do to see what you've been up to is open your profile. Law 4: Always Say Less than Necessary Law 16: Use Absence to Incr…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 01:54 PM
1

Ironically, raising a girl in that male value system (a stable nuclear family) is the most likely system to put her in a position to achieve her sexual imperative's end goal of securing commitment from an alpha-bucks before she hits the wall. Women raised in broken families are far more likely to ride the CC when they're young and then end up settling for a beta provider to have kids with, because no alpha will commit to a post-wall 'reformed' CC-rider. The end result is that she will be miserab…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 01:42 PM
1

A typical assertion in this section of the internet is that men find low N women more attractive, but women find high N men more attractive. I'm not aware of anyone who asserts that. TRP asserts that women are less repulsed by high N count men than men are by high N count women, because of pre-selection. Take your straw man elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 10:12 PM
4

TRP has a lot more in common with feminism than is often discussed. Specifically the strong independent womyn. They don't need no man, which is good because I don't want to be her beta provider. She can have her own job and pay for her own shit
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 07:21 PM
5

It's so hard to see my male friends being idiots though that sometimes I just lose it and start dropping TRP truths like bombs. It's so radical to them that it breaks their brains and upsets them I guess I need to work on my frame
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 07:20 PM
7

Wrong, there are always going to be thirsty betas out there for her
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 07:16 PM
1

I can't do it either. I woke up at around 5 when I was in high school. No matter how much sleep I got, I was always tired. On the weekends when I could sleep in I felt fantastic.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/17 03:07 AM
1

Getting 8 hours and going to bed and waking up at the same every day is FAR more important than waking up at some arbitrary time every day.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/17 03:03 AM
4

Overthinking can just be the result of high anxiety, which can be due to low seratonjn levels in the brain. Some people's brains just don't work right no matter how hard they lift, how good of shape they're in,or how healthy their lifestyle is. After I started on anti-depressants, I felt like a kid again and stopped overthinking shit. It was incredibly liberating.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/17 11:37 AM
1

I'm short and look very young I often get adorable. I was in the same boat as you when I was your age. In fact, worse off. I didn't even lose my virginity until my second semester of college. I had severe social anxiety You'll grow out of the baby face eventually, especially if you're lifting. It just means later on down the road when you grow into your looks, your SMV will be higher than ever before because your looks will be better than ever, and you'll be making money so you'll be able to eff…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/17 01:21 PM
2

We are all victims. Victims of government that takes our money at gunpoint and uses it to destroy our Liberty
/r/TheRedPill11/08/17 12:52 PM
2

TRP is inherently political
/r/TheRedPill11/08/17 12:51 PM
2

It's the worst form of cuckoldry. No it's not, the worst form is when your LTR does it to you
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 11:58 PM
1

*girls Semantics Let us look at the definition of ready: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/ready completely prepared or in fit condition for immediate action or use: Girls are not completely prepared or in fit condition to give birth. Girls who are mature enough are. Let me show you why they are not ready: The pelvis does not fully widen until the late teens, meaning that young girls may not be able to push the baby through the birth canal. The younger you are, the more trauma will occur, because…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 08:36 PM
1

You did which is why you asked me for a source. If if was just an opinionion you would have said this. Totally false. Because you need to accept that young teen girls are not the best for child birth, your questions are you throwing a fit. You want to redirect the conversation and I staying the course. I refuted your claim. You wanted to justify your sexual preference/attraction to them by using the biology argument. I have seen this before. I never once said that "young teen girls" are the best…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 07:08 PM
2

Be pissed all you want, just harness the negative energy into improving your SMV. Go to the gym and take your anger out on the weights
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 03:27 PM
1

Biological sex is very real and there are certain things that all women have in common and certain things that all men have in common. Everyone just disagrees where that line gets drawn between treating the sexes as individuals or as a group. Race is a bogus social construct that arbitrarily groups people based on certain physical characteristics that they coincidentally happen to exhibit outwardly. There's no hard line between the races like there is between XX and XY individuals. It's all one …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 03:09 PM
0

Mother Nature is cruel and she doesn't care about your feelings. Women are cruel to you because they don't want to reproduce with you, and subconsciously don't want you reproducing with any other woman because they have subconsciously decided it would be bad for the human race. They also subconsciously are psychologically destroying you in order to prevent you from ever having the self esteem to even approach women. It's not a conscious conspiracy among women, it's just how they evolved. It's th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 03:00 PM
1

Generally speaking under 17 aren't biologically ready. Thus the complications. Now you're resorting to moving the goal posts. First you said "Under 17 aren't biologically ready" and now you're saying "generally speaking under 17 aren't biologically ready." You haven't posted anything but opinions you tried to past as facts. I didn't try to pass any opinion off as a fact. Notice how you didn't actually answer any of the questions I asked in my previous post. You just ignored them. You dodge my qu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 02:28 PM
1

The only thing your sources prove is that some women are fully developed younger than others, and that being under developed carries an increased risk of complications. It's a case by case basis. You can't just make a blanket statement that all women under 17 aren't ready because that's false. Besides, just saying that 15-19 year olds have an elevated risk compared to 20+ year olds doesn't tell the whole story. What about 15-18 year olds compared to 19+? 15-17 compared to 18+? 15-16 compared to …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 01:07 PM
2

Most RPers are not hostile towards women. We don't even allow women on our sub to be hostile towards them, we give them their own space at redpillwomen. If as a whole we were hostile towards women, no woman would go to that sub. TRP is a safe space for men to vent, and many of the men there have been hurt by women and are just beginning to digest the pill, and are thus still in the anger phase. These men are probably low status. But saying that all TRP men are hostile towards women is demonstrab…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 08:27 PM
1

Your sources only demonstrate that being under 17 carries an elevated risk of complications. They don't prove that all women under 17 are not ready to have babies. That's just a false blanket statement you fabricated.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 07:53 PM
1

No I did not. "Standard normal distribution" means SD=1. I said "normal distribution". Read back what I wrote. Same thing, only difference is mean =HB0 instead of Hb5 Who knows... but it's not 1. Prove it You need to be clear on what "standard normal distribution" means. Look here: https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/standard-normal-distribution-table.html I know what it means That's a standard normal distribution. SD=1, and you'll see that it centres on ZERO. Shifting it up to 5 and then not scalin…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 05:23 PM
2

"Victims of childhood abuse way more likely to be attracted to assholes" because "your assertion about it being 'how they're biologically wired, period,' is wrong," doesn't make any sense. It doesn't logically follow. It's like saying people die because the sky is blue. It's a non sequitur.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 03:06 PM
1

Source
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 01:30 PM
2

Feel free to explain how it does not mean what I think it means
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 12:44 PM
1

Your comment is a non-sequitor. "Victims of childhood abuse way more likely to be attracted to assholes because your assertion about it being 'how they're biologically wired, period,' is wrong," is a non-sequitor.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 10:50 PM
1

So height distribution in inches has SD=1? Height distribution in mm has SD=1? Penis length in mm has SD=1? IQ has SD=1? I don't know. Do they? Oh but for NO REASON AT ALL, the HB scale (also stupid) has SD=1? It's not no reason at all. You already agreed that HB has a standard normal distribution, which automatically means SD=1. Make up your mind. So all things that go 0 to 10 have a standard deviation of 1? I never said that I know you're trying to claim "standard" as some sort of universal tr…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 09:14 PM
1

standard normal distribution is when SD=1
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 08:33 PM
1

Because I don't see any reason to believe that female attractiveness would have anything but a standard normal distribution
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 08:29 PM
1

Just a normal std deviation of 1
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 07:05 PM
4

An HB9 is a woman that his hotter than 90% of the female population So you're telling me that 1/10 women I see are HB9's? I don't think so. It's distributed among a bell curve, where most women are HB4, 5's, and 6's...with 7s, 8s, and 9s progressively becoming more rare as you move up the scale. HB10: 0.0001% of the female population. A unicorn. Effectively non-existent for all intents and purposes. If you're lucky, you might see one of these in your entire life. HB9: 0.013% of the female popula…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 05:40 PM
2

I agree to a certain point. For example being a drug dealer is a bad boy thing, but if drugs were legalized it wouldn't be that big of a deal. So what women view as a bad boy or asshole certainly can be due to social standards. But attraction to assholes and bad boys is still wired into women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 11:27 PM
2

Women have always been attracted to assholes so your analogy is flawed. How did I make an excluded middle fallacy?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 11:11 PM
5

Non sequitor
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 11:04 PM
1

Unless she's raped, it's always her choice to sleep with them though
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 09:49 PM
1

No I'm not. I'm saying the women who engage in casual sex who want more than that have a hamster that convinces them that a relationship may be possible to justify to themselves why they're continuing to have casual sex with a certain guy
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 09:15 PM
1

That's because most women don't want to be with guys who openly admit they only want casual sex. It takes away all plausible deniability and will make her feel more like a slut. Women prefer the comfortable illusion that a relationship may be possible, even if deep down they know it's probably not going to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 08:51 PM
1

That would work with some women. Not sure what your point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 08:36 PM
2

I don't know. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 08:26 PM
1

Not if you admit to being a player in your dating profile
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 08:24 PM
2

No amount of socialization can change who someone is sexually attracted to. These feminists are basically arguing using the same logic that homophobes use when saying homosexuality is a choice. Women are attracted to assholes because that's how they're biologically wired, period.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 04:11 PM
0

Why would I do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 02:19 PM
1

In my experience liberal women are definitely more likely to have higher N counts than their neo-conservative counterparts. But the average modern neo-conservative woman still has an unacceptably high N count.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 04:39 AM
1

There's no reason for a man to get married this day in age unless he wants a tax break. Not worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 04:36 AM
2

Men get player shamed by women shit testing them. It's a compliment disguised as an insult. Betas do not understand powertalk, so they don't realize this. Pre-selection is the reason the average woman isn't as disgusted as the average man is by members of the opposite sex who sleep around.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 04:31 AM
1

Yes because most women are fat, old, have STDs, or some combination of the three.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 04:25 AM
6

Motherhood, it’s the hardest job in the world. Whether or not you consider being motherhood a "real job", it's objectively false that being a mother is the most difficult thing someone can do with their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 02:48 AM
3

Agreed. Drunken sex is overrated, sex while stoned is the best
/r/TheRedPill05/08/17 10:48 AM
3

Not sure how I feel about the smoking/driving though I'm better at driving when I'm stoned than when I'm sober. When I'm sober, I'm extremely impatient, speeding, texting, fiddling with the radio and my ipod, checking my hair in the rearview mirror. When I'm stoned I've got my hands at 10 and 2 and my attention is 100% on the road and my surroundings, no music, obey all traffic laws because my nerves are calmed, and I'm trying to avoid police attention as much as possible. When I'm sober IDGAF. …
/r/TheRedPill05/08/17 10:45 AM
4

To end a great night my erection comes back with a vengeance and I give her the good fucking she deserves. Wasn't expecting that based on your title. Glad this story had a happy ending
/r/TheRedPill05/08/17 10:36 AM
3

At first I thought you meant he was saying that he won't commit to any woman because he just views them all as warm holes. Then I realized you meant that he's so desperate that he will fuck anything with a pussy. Awful. Even in my worst blue pill years as a teenager, I had standards.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/17 10:22 AM
1

As in, act as though you're the prize and she has to win you. That's how you pull her into your frame.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/17 10:20 AM
2

Calling women today is now "weird". Doesn't matter what you think about how it 'separates you from everyone else'. She most likely wont pick up. Don't bother unless she's your gf. Calling is not as validating as it used to be. Now you're just a drop in the validation/stimulus bucket. By waiting for or answering your call, she's not gaining any extra dopamine spikes as opposed to all the other stimuli. Detached non-in person communication is better. I disagree with that. If you're attractive, cal…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/17 10:18 AM
-1

Looks matter for guys, but it is FAR LESS important then character and behavior attributes. Nope. Looks > Game > Status > Money Looks are still the most important. You can be the richest rock star in the world with super tight game, but if you're 5'2" and weigh 350 lbs, you're not going to be making any young high quality pussy wet.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/17 10:01 AM
57

Yep, "alpha" is just a word that describes exhibition of genetics and behaviors that women find sexually attractive and get their dopamine flowing. "Beta" is exhibition of genetics and behaviors that women find preferable for long term relationships and are good for bonding/oxytocin, like being a provider of resources/emotional validation/attention, etc. Even TRP sidebar introduction says that no man should strive to be 100% alpha, but a healthy mixture of alpha and beta.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/17 02:16 AM
13

They can say there is no such thing as an alpha male until they're blue in the face. You can't win a debate with hypergamy.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/17 06:37 PM
1

This is why the state shouldn't be in charge of healthcare to begin with. Government is the enemy of the Red Pill man.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/17 07:31 PM
1

Yeah but if you make having a test be required to have kids, then that opens the door for the state to take away the kids and put them in foster care while the parents go to jail. Or even force the mother to have an abortion. Neither of those solutions is good for the child, requiring a test would just make things worse for the children. Think of it this way. Idiot parents don't get their kids vaccinated for measles - kid gets measles and dies. Idiot parents go to jail for manslaughter. Natural …
/r/TheRedPill01/08/17 03:13 PM
1

That's always been the case with science though. The beauty is that the objective truth always wins out in the end. Science doesn't give a shit about politics or your opinions. Or as Max Planck put it: "A scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die..." The problem is with people failing to recognize the difference between credible and non credible sources. You can't fix stupid, but science will.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/17 02:57 PM
1

If the experiment was flawed, it will be ripped to shreds by criticizing the methodology or by experiments that prove it false. Simply saying that the scientists are wrong because they had an agenda does not prove the science is wrong. You have to actually prove it wrong in order for it to be wrong.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/17 02:35 PM
1

No, that doesn't prove the science wrong. Saying the science is wrong just because the people conducting it had an agenda is an ad hominem logical fallacy.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/17 02:16 PM
1

Yes, sometimes they do lie and it's a shit test. My friends wife flirts with me often and she teases me for wearing shirts that are too tight for me and randomly makes a point of announcing that she's not attracted to buff guys, because her dadbod husband is right next to her. Then she will turn around and start talking about how hot she thinks certain celebrities are, and they are buff bodybuilders.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 08:40 PM
2

Because what girls/women really want (Alphas), and telling 80+% of men they're not what women are sexually attracted to, is politically incorrect. Girls want guys who just "get" it and guys who don't get it naturally aren't worthy of being told by women what they need to do to be alpha. These men repulse women, and so women tell men to do things that will make them even more beta which further repulses more women. It's all subconscious of course, it's not like there's some kind of conscious cons…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 07:04 PM
3

Nothing you said contradicts anything I said.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/17 05:47 PM
17

It doesn't necessarily mean the science is wrong, just that certain areas of science that could be funded with that money instead are starved of funding and science that will further the states agenda is advanced. So things like cancer research are inhibited so we can make more advanced weapons.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/17 04:11 PM
96

The state only funds science which is beneficial to its agenda
/r/TheRedPill30/07/17 01:53 PM
1

Yeah I figured out long ago the best way to have a conversation with someone is to just keep asking them questions to get them to talk about themselves. People like when someone wants to talk about them, because it doesn't happen often. People just want to talk about themselves, and they're more likely to respect you in the end because you make them feel like you actually care about them.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/17 07:37 PM
3

You can't be friends with a woman like you can a man because women are opportunistically loyal. Bottom line.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/17 01:19 PM
5

WTF is this shit. I have female "friends" that I find attractive, but wouldn't fuck because they are off-limits for one reason or another, and I find myself around them often. These women are useful to practice game on. I put friends in quotes because it's impossible to be friends with a woman the same way you can be friends with a man.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/17 01:17 PM
1

I was like you at that age. You're worried about the clock ticking because Blue Pill media has subconsciously programmed you to think that men and women are equal. Remember the wall doesn't exist for men like it does for women. Men don't hit the wall on average until much later in life, so you have decades before that happens. That's plenty of time to get your shit together. As an example, I started lifting and bodybuilding a few years ago. I'm in my early 30s and just last week a petite blonde …
/r/TheRedPill29/07/17 12:30 PM
2

I agree. Women who aren't fat but are old are 5's automatically. There's nothing more disgusting than being fat
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 01:44 AM
1

Getting angry = losing frame
/r/TheRedPill29/07/17 01:41 AM
1

Yeee
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 01:37 AM
7

Non sequitor
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 01:36 AM
3

Don't be a hero, call the police. Going to jail or getting fucked up over a woman thats not a family member that I'm not fucking couldn't be less worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 01:26 AM
1

Automation isn't the issue. It's the quality and cost of education that is the issue, preventing low skilled workers from moving into positions where they can make more money so machines can do the crap that nobody wants to do, and that nobody wants to pay somebody to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 08:37 PM
1

Burden of proof is on you
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 02:09 PM
1

Most men are also beta af.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 02:53 AM
1

So what? My points stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 05:21 PM
1

Yes if your SMV is high enough
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 03:06 PM
1

Okay. Thanks for sharing your baseless opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 02:12 PM
1

I don't know. How many?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 12:15 PM
1

That doesn't further your argument in any way. You could change her age to 18 in your example and it wouldn't make any difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 12:13 PM
2

My point stands
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 12:10 PM
2

Source
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 12:10 PM
1

And my point is that 15 year olds are sexually mature and old enough to decide for themselves what they want to do with their own bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 12:59 AM
3

You should move over here on the east side of Oakland
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 11:25 PM
2

Except that with an 18 year old, it's not 'voluntary'. That's the point. An 18 year old girl does not have the capacity/maturity to be in an adult relationship with an adult man. It's statutory rape because it's the willful exploitation of the naivety of 18 year old girls. I don't see why this is so hard to understand. And the hypocrisy is amusing, because these same men would balk at the thought of their own 18 year old daughters being in relationships/having sex with adult men. See what I just…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 11:01 PM
2

Fair enough, but realistically though, there wouldn't be a way to fuck them without building some sort of relationship though. Which would require at least, occasionally listening to them. Having sex with someone doesn't necessarily require much verbal communication, if any, after meeting them. How else would you convince them to "consent"? Unless you are forgoing that whole... thing. In which case, we aren't even talking about this culture or it's teenage girls. Oh I see. Now you're trying to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 10:58 PM
2

Yes if you come to America and have sex with a girl that is 17 years, 364 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes, and 59 seconds old, you will go to jail for life. If you have sex with a girl who is 18 years, 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes, and 0 seconds old, she is completely legal and you are fine. In America, 1 second can mean the difference between life in prison and being fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 10:50 PM
1

Is 18 your cut off age? What if an eleven year old has already developed secondary sexual characteristics? Is it morally acceptable for someone who is programmed to be attracted to those characteristics to pursue her for sex? The average age of menstruation for girls in the US is now twelve, after all. See what I just did there? Nobody is talking about 11/12 year olds, so your question about them is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 10:47 PM
4

An 18 year old is not going to be an equal in a relationship with an adult. They do not have the power or autonomy to set and enforce their own boundaries. Age of consent should be 26 year old (with some flexibility for small age gaps). See what I just did there? You could literally just make up two numbers and it wouldn't make your argument any more valid, because it's just your baseless opinion. I disagree with your baseless claim. Men who pursue sexual relationships with children are not priz…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 10:45 PM
3

Because we aren't talking about being in a relationship with, or even listening to teenage girls. We are taking about fucking them. You're trying to discourage men from pursuing younger women because they are obnoxious, but the real reason is because subconsciously, your reptilian brain is trying to eliminate competition from them. And your hamster is working overtime converting those feelings into higher level rationalizations.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:50 PM
1

I probably wouldn't be ok with it. If I raised her right then she would not be so naive. If she was so naive then I would consider myself a failure as a parent. Change 15 to 18 and my answer remains. Whether she's 18 or 15 is totally inconsequential to the fact that I believe she's old enough to make her own decisions at 15 instead of 18. Standards of Socialization is a lame excuse for people to hide behind for raising immature kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:44 PM
5

15 year olds are not equipped to have a relationship with an adult man in our society. I disagree with your baseless opinion. 15 year olds are more than capable of deciding what to do with their own bodies. Where do you think the line should be drawn? I feel protective over young women, not competitive. Get real. Subconsciously you're trying to limit your competition. Your biology is driving your beliefs on the topic and you don't realize it. Your hamster is spinning it into a higher level ratio…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:35 PM
1

15 year olds are not equipped to have a relationship with an adult man in our society. I disagree with your baseless opinion. 15 year olds are more than capable of deciding what to do with their own bodies. Where do you think the line should be drawn?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:19 PM
1

Watching your hamster spin is fun
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:15 PM
6

The only people you're protecting by stopping a man and a 15 year old girl from engaging in voluntary sexual activity is the older women who subconsciously want to eliminate their youthful female competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:09 PM
3

This post reeks of misandry
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:07 PM
1

Exactly, our biology remains the same. It's shameful to stop adult men from legally pursuing 15 year old women. They're old enough to make decisions about their own bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:06 PM
3

That's because that's when girls are biologically ready to have babies
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:00 PM
2

Inflation is absolutely a contributing factor, it means we have to go into more debt in general to afford things.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 06:59 PM
2

Ok so where do you draw the line between being completely legal and going to jail for life? What age? Please give your answer to the precision of hours and minutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 06:57 PM
1

Having fun
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 04:49 PM
1

My girlfriend openly admits that she's turned on by bad boys
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 12:27 AM
6

If you have a Facebook friend count, you're doing it wrong
/r/TheRedPill25/07/17 12:02 AM
1

Alpha is a descriptor of a combination of genetics and behaviors. You might be able to eradicate beta behavior from men by educating them, but there are always going to be top 20% genetics. Men might become more alpha in the future but you're always going to have a top 20% of genetic specimens.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 08:48 PM
1

Then what are you complaining about? That women use online dating apps as a tool for attention and validation only? That's obvious though, on any social media you're automatically entering in a woman's frame. It's your job to pull her into your frame but 99% of them won't let you do it
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 06:44 PM
1

False, I've pulled HB7 pussy online and I'm nowhere near as tall as you. Your online game must be shit.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 06:37 PM
1

How do you suppose men will be blamed for it?
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 06:35 PM
13

Best criticism of Ron Paul I've ever read
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 03:56 PM
2

I personally don't subscribe to the left/right path dichotomy. I think everything is left path when you examine it more closely
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 03:07 PM
3

Actually the best way to infiltrate a movement is to become a top financer of it and then make sure all of the top spokesmen are your puppets. That wouldn't really work with TRP because the best they could do is infiltrate the mod team.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 02:56 PM
2

It won't work. TRP is too fundamentally anti left
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 02:53 PM
1

Wish archive.is had a way to archive videos so that this sub doesn't generate her any more views/validation/attention.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 02:48 PM
4

There's no reason to be polite in a society that finds it morally acceptable to rob people at gunpoint and call it "taxation".
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 12:38 PM
10

We don't. That's how our opponents brand us because they assume that our prejudices about women automatically means we all must be racist Trump supporters.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 12:33 PM
41

That's when the tactic shifts to ignoring the truth and instead simply repeating falsehoods louder than the person telling the truth, so people forget about the truth and instead go with their feelz. That's why Ron Paul lost the primaries in 2008 and 2012. He told the truth 100% of the time but the Republicans preferred the feelz that John McCain and Mitt Romney gave them instead.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 12:29 PM
1

It's not different because women don't feel used with Chad until he won't commit to her. Women always feel like betas are trying to use them as sexual objects, because they aren't really attracted to their BB.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 04:32 AM
9

I don't think anyone over there expects it to be a catch-all solution, but not jerking off for a long time definitely has a lot of mental and physical benefits.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/17 10:54 PM
2

I never complain about that
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 01:08 PM
1

Yes. When I was a little kid, the girls I played with were all either a couple years older than me or a couple years younger than me. Once I hit about 9 or so, that's when I started playing with girls my own age but it wasn't anything role playing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 01:07 PM
2

I think when he said "wins the girl" he just meant the douchebag is the one who fucks the girl. I don't think he literally meant the girl becomes "his". Because that would imply women are capable of being loyal, which they aren't because they would all either cheat or branch swing with the right guy under the right circumstances.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/17 12:54 PM
1

Practically zero. When I was 4 years old I knew that I wanted to "date" multiple women at the same time, despite all adults in my life being monogamous. Obviously I didn't know why at that point, but it's hardwired into the male brain. It's just biology and no amount of media can change that. What the media does do is indoctrinate people with statist propaganda that causes them to vote for politicians that ruin this country and pass laws that destroy families.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 12:31 PM
1

Ok but my point still stands, if it's the right alpha she will let him "use" her
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 12:21 PM
1

Women legally allowed to finish sex even if man revokes consent, NC Law States
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 05:22 AM
1

All women will let alphas use them sexually. So by your definition, all women are sluts, which means no women are sluts, which means your definition is useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 07:20 PM
46

I'm pretty sure that no fap is started by guys who are trying to quit watching porn so they can enjoy sex more
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 06:26 PM
9

Being confrontational doesn't necessarily mean you're breaking frame and not being stoic or chill though. There's a difference between, say, starting an argument with someone and trying to get someone to fight you.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 06:23 PM
1

Double digits
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:20 PM
1

Different for every guy
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:11 PM
1

I agree that women are no more likely to be collectivists than men. The US was riddled with collectivism before women even had the right to vote. Women are just as violently natured as men are. Otherwise after women gained the right to vote, the US would be involved in less wars and be more individualistic. Most people are unprincipled and will vote for whatever they believe will personally benefit them. You don't know what freedom is if you think right wing libertarians have it wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 01:04 PM
1

That's Blue Pill horseshit. Any women that finds you sufficiently attractive will sleep with you for free. AWALT
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 12:41 PM
1

A woman who has had too many sexual partners to be worthy of an LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 12:40 PM
3

I did. I wasn't personally shamed, but hearing feminists and white knights both in real life and on the Internet talking about how it's all men's fault that some men rape women. That sort of looniness and backwards thinking drove me further towards TRP. Plus the general left-wing intolerance and close-mindedness over on the 2X and feminist subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 12:36 PM
1

I always ask every partner. Even if she's lying, at least I can get a rough idea of what the likelihood that she's going to have an STD
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 12:34 PM
1

What about resisting temptation? And yes the word BS is exactly what that story was
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 09:36 PM
1

Good point. I guess I should clarify that I was referring to men who swallow the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 07:29 PM
1

No. Every single person who went from RP to BP that I've encountered demonstrates a gross misunderstanding of TRP, which means they weren't RP to begin with. Not to say it couldn't happen, just that it never has.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 07:02 PM
1

Women also like cool, stoic, muscular, tough, dominant artsy/hipster guys more than skinny submissive emotional weak ones. The more experience with women I gathered the more I realized that I actually don't have to be hypermasculine and that it's men, not women, that don't want you to show your emotions and that women don't care if you cry once in a whole and that being less stoic and more friendly/respectful is a great way to bond with women. That's fine and dandy if you want to be one of the g…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 07:00 PM
1

Nobody ever goes from having fully digested the red pill to being blue pill. It's always people who swallow the red pill and spit it back up. Those people were never RP to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 04:15 PM
0

That is a pretty big double standard. Women cheat because they are slaves to their hypergamy. Not cheating with the right guy under the right circumstances would be a betrayal of her biology. They can't really be blamed for cheating, because it's the guys fault that his SMV wasn't high enough and he erroneously believed that women have any agency or concept of loyalty. They don't. It is 100% the man's fault if a woman cheats on him. Some men who cheat do so because they know that all women will …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 04:03 PM
1

Then you would be able to comprehend that selecting for pro-social "beta" males is part of evo-psych, not against it. Of course, that's the AF/BB dual sexual strategy that women use. That doesn't contradict anything I said. Go outside a visit your local park or shopping mall, and observe the families with young children there. Are the dads mostly 6'4" Chads with cut abs and chiseled jaws? Or your average beta male? You'll likely find that the men that get to reproduce belong to the latter catego…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 03:39 PM
1

Not sure why you're being downvoted. The fact that OP didn't provide pics tells me he's full of shit.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/17 01:22 AM
1

I don't say that women are terrible. Women are wonderful.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 01:20 AM
1

After a certain age, less and less women are going to have casual sex with you Depends entirely on what your SMV is relative to theirs. I'd agree that the average SMV of women you'll be able to have casual sex with will go down after you hit the wall. But that certainly does not mean you'll have less access to casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 01:17 AM
1

Think about Economics 101, the law of supply and demand. Men and women on the whole are in equal demand of each other. But when it comes to supply, things are different. Men produce effectively an infinite amount of sperm, so that makes sperm worthless. A woman only has a finite number of eggs and a finite timeframe in which she can get pregnant, so that makes eggs in much lower supply than sperm, which means the eggs are worth much more than sperm is. Because eggs are more valuable, it stands t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 01:11 AM
3

So eventually guys will either be Tom Cruise or an incel. Nice false dichotomy
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 12:58 AM
1

You're missing the point and moving goal posts. Hunter/gatherer tribes already had organized societies and they are congruent to evo psych, not against it. I'm doing no such thing. I never said hunter/gatherer tribes didn't have organized societies, and I never said they were against evo-psych. Women don't willingly mate with men who are anti-social (that is, against society), and the kind of man you are describing (violent, selfish, antagonistic) aren't selected for by choice. Totally nonsense.…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 12:34 AM
2

That makes no sense. There's no shortage of women looking to have casual sex and/or LTR's at any age.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 12:11 AM
1

This has not been the case for eons, though. The concept of trade and barter between tribes has been going on dating back to caveman days when all this evo psych supposedly is cited. Humans have long ago figured out that it's better to work together and trade resources rather than each individual man going off to hunt his own wooly mammoth. Or killing a cave full of people and taking their 3 months stock of food vs developing a social contract where you all hunt/harvest and thus help everyone su…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 06:00 PM
3

I don't understand how a decline in physically attractive characteristics means a man is back where he started pre RP and can't continue self improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 05:03 PM
1

Women don't want men to commit violence for them because that increases the chances that their men will die or end up in jail, thus hurting the family's chances of survival. Women reward men who are capable of extracting resources by having social connections and status, especially since the 20th century. Women want men to commit violence for them because men are more capable of winning violent confrontations than men are. Whether it's with a violent confrontation with other men who want to rape…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 04:38 PM
1

I don't understand how hitting the wall means a man is back where he started pre RP and can't continue self improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 03:48 PM
1

You're missing the point which is that men aren't more violent by nature than women are. Sure men may be more likely to actually be the ones committing the violence, but women want men to commit violence for them. Women reward violent men with sex and reproduction, and vote for violent warmongering politicians. If women were less violent than men, we'd see the amount of wars go down after women gained the right to vote. That didn't happen, but what we do see is an increase in the amount of wars …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 03:32 PM
3

It takes a lot less effort for women to appear sexually attractive. From a biological standpoint this makes sense because eggs are limited and so is the amount of times a woman can get pregnant. Eggs command a higher price in the sexual market than sperm does, because sperm is practically infinite. So women are in a position to demand higher quality sperm because it takes them less effort to get it. Thus it takes more effort for men to appear attractive than it does for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 02:23 PM
1

What do you mean by "you're fucked"?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 01:11 PM
2

That post doesn't have the word "loser" anywhere in it. Stop being dishonest OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 12:35 PM
1

That's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 08:46 PM
1

It's conjecture that hasn't been disproven
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 08:36 PM
1

Yes, some. But some men would never cheat...emotionally or physically....under any circumstances no matter what woman would come along.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 08:13 PM
2

Well you might go through your whole life never cheating or branch can swinging, emotionally or physically. Not all women are cheaters and not all women end up branch swinging. But the point is that hypothetically if you were in the right situation with the right guy it would happen. Obviously that can't be objectively disproven or proven, but that's fundamentally what AWALT means - it's conjecture.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 07:59 PM
4

Testosterone hasn't driven me to engage in war, murder, rape, embezzlement, theft, or using the power of the state to reduce women to second class citizens. You just pulled that out of your ass because of the actions of some men. Men who do these things seek power, because women choose to reproduce with powerful men. Women want war like men with high T to pass their genes on. If women didn't want that, they would punish powerful men by being sexually repulsed by them. But they're not, because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 07:36 PM
3

Some women are better than others at keeping their hypergamy under control. But don't allow yourself to fall under the delusion that you wouldn't cheat and/or branch swing under the right circumstances if the right guy came along. One that you were actually sexually attracted to instead of the guys you've been with that you don't find sexually attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 07:24 PM
1

Women make up half the amount of people that elect those politicians. Women are responsible for a supermajority of consumer spending that profits those businesses with male CEOs. Men dominate those positions of power because women put them there.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 07:20 PM
1

Depends on if they deserve it or not
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 04:39 PM
1

Speak for yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 03:50 PM
4

Emotionally cheated on me the entire time we were dating, physically cheated on me and kept it a secret for 8 months. As far as I know. In my blue pill days I didn't know how she could sleep at night, but now I realize that it's because women have an incredibly sociopathic lack of remorse about following their hypergamous instincts. AWALT And why shouldn't they? It's their biological nature to ensure the best genes get passed on, and she determined that I wasn't the best genes that she could acc…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 03:43 PM
2

They're woman hating misogynistic blue pillers because what she did was just AWALT. It's the guys fault entirely that she didn't fuck him
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 02:27 PM
2

Those sound like they were written by guys. Not saying this stuff doesn't happen but I really don't think a woman would word things that way.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 02:18 PM
1

Believing another race is superior is prejudiced in favor of, not prejudiced against. The definition of racism you quoted doesn't support your position. Why are you assuming I'm black?
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 09:44 PM
2

Simply repeating yourself doesn't further your argument in any way. Please quote anything I posted which leads you to believe that I said I have a fixation or worship of white women.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 09:33 PM
2

Fetishizing a race is not prejudice or discrimination against any race.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 09:29 PM
2

Fetishizing a race is not prejudice or discrimination against any race.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 09:18 PM
1

Still in the anger phase I see
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 07:43 PM
1

False. In fact, women make up the majority of voters in the US
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 05:11 PM
1

False. The US is currently being destroyed by men and women
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 05:10 PM
3

Rome was destroyed because the government inflated the currency until it was worthless and couldn't afford to govern anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 05:09 PM
1

I think my friend might just be in denial about being a cuckold. A couple months ago he went on a tirade about how he doesn't understand how any man could want to be a cuckold and how they're scum. Yet here he is dating a stripper who is cucking him. I almost want to say he's a closet self hating cuckold...like guys who are extremely homophobic that turn out to be gay. Except he's a cuck.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 05:00 PM
1

My first thought when I read your first paragraph was "Napoleon Hill". And then immediately after I thought that, you started taking about Think and Grow Rich. Creepy.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 04:52 PM
-1

I think you meant to say 4.5 months...fetuses as young as 20 weeks have survived outside the womb. I don't think abortion should be legal after 20 weeks....after that they should induce birth.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 04:15 PM
1

Similarly if one parent turns out to be abusive, on drugs, in prison, etc. they won't just get the child because the prenup from 10 years ago said so. Unless you're a woman then you can be the biggest low life piece of shit heroin addict burglar and get custody of the kids automatically if the dad accidentally says something the judge doesn't agree with
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 03:16 PM
1

Blue pillers are hateful hypocrites, thanks for providing data to back that up
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 01:54 PM
2

I'd fall under your traditionalist category. Someday When I'm ready to have kids with my LTR, we will move in together and start a family. I'm not necessarily opposed to a religious marriage if it's the right girl (as long as I don't have to pay for a wedding or spend more money on a ring than she'd spend on any other gift for me). legal marriage is absolutely out of the question. Not opposed to opening a joint account that we each contribute 50/50 to if the money is strictly used for joint expe…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 01:51 PM
4

These people are sick in the head. Aborting an eight month old fetus is unquestionably murder. Murder just to save money.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 01:38 PM
2

This is a completely normal part of digesting the pill. Think about the Five Stages of Grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. You are in the depression phase because you know TRP is true, but you haven't come to terms with it. Once you accept it, you will love women more than ever before because you understand them. Your interactions with them will reflect this. Just keep lifting and thinking about TRP and improving your SMV. Don't stop.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 03:35 AM
4

The sad truth is he's just gonna have to ride this out until he learns the hard way. The harder you push. The harder he resists. Yep that's why I'm fucking off. He made his decision so he can live with it. But I will not hesitate to tell him I told you so when he gets burned.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 03:26 AM
2

Does my post history look like I make shit up for imaginary internet points?
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 03:23 AM
7

Wars, and men being killed by sabertooth tigers when they went out hunting
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 09:40 PM
16

Because he betrayed my trust.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 08:42 PM
3

Read the Laws of Power on the sidebar then come back and post after youve learned something.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 02:32 PM
9

The boogeyman of thinking you aren't big enough is something that could potentially apply only to the tiny slice of the population that is any big to begin with. Yes, and most of the people who are obsessed with thinking they aren't big enough are permabulkers. A good chunk of guys who lift weights are into bodybuilding, not permabulking. That means they cut and bulk, so they are routinely cutting calories and losing mass.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 02:29 PM
2

My friend was pretty naturally redpill...spun plates, said he thought LTRs werent worth it, lifted, had solid game, lots of money, tall, handsome, ethnic, etc. Well he decided to LTRd a stripper and I told him exactly what I thought. Hes upset, gets drunk and turns around and tells her everything I said ("you sure she's never banged any of her clients? when she says she feels bad that youre dating her, what she really means is shes going to lose attraction for you because you think so lowly of y…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 05:06 AM
2

It's sad, but it's not my fault and it's not my job to make them feel better about it. Bingo. We don't live in a Just-World, which is the fallacy that so many people believe in. The world is not perfect, Mother Nature is amoral, and she doesn't give a fuck about your feelings or anyone elses. Black women being upset at black men dating outside their race is like being upset at the sky for being blue.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 04:58 AM
1

Totally false. Saying they're racist implies that it's a belief that they can control. You can't control who you're sexually attracted to, or why you're sexually attracted to them. There's nothing racist about fetishizing another race from your own, regardless of what your reasons are.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 04:54 AM
1

She clinged onto her relationship, and vented to me about how much of an asshole her boyfriend was. She'd always talk about how he would refuse to come over when she was horny and how he wasn't sexually satisfying her, which made him a huge douche bag. Guess who was there to fuck her. And guess who did. Keep in mind I was never a beta orbiter. She wanted to fuck me long before she got into this relationship. I relegated myself to beta orbiter status because I was a blue pill niceguy that thought…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 04:51 AM
15

Women get away with this because they can. From a biological standpoint, eggs are valuable and sperm are worthless. Women can only be pregnant once every 9 months and men can impregnate practically infinite women. Women are the limiting reagent, so they are naturally the more picky choosers. If they can only get pregnant once every 9 months and have a limited amount of eggs, why wouldn't they be? Accept the fact that you're a man and therefore completely disposable. Because you're disposable, yo…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 04:46 AM
6

That's exactly right. The masculine man does not need to have his mind controlled by the power structures of society that over 90% of people allow their minds to be controlled by...mainly organized religion, mainstream media...and ESPECIALLY government, which is the number one enemy of the red pill man.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/17 01:23 PM
1

Even if she's your LTR, she should be demoted to plate status
/r/TheRedPill15/07/17 01:18 PM
1

They think I have literally zero problems and that while I work hard, everything flows and comes easy for me. Law 30: Make Your Accomplishments Seem Effortless Even if you don't make your accomplishments seem effortless, women are completely incapable of empathizing with men or even remotely understanding the struggles men face to achieve their objectives. There is no reason at all to make a woman think you have any big problems. Have you ever watched any chick flicks? If you have, you'll notice…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/17 03:03 AM
1

Of course I make fun of their problems in jest, but I don't answer their questions legitimately all of the time. Because almost all the time, they don't actually want advice on how to rectify their situation. They want someone to dump their problems on and sympathize with them
/r/TheRedPill15/07/17 02:52 AM
32

Just ignore her for at least 2 days (if living together) or a week if living apart If she does something to warrant you ignoring her for a week straight, it's serious enough that you should be demoting her as well.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/17 02:49 AM
19

You can be the biggest baddest wealthiest rock star in the world with dozens of 21 year old plates in every city in the world, big muscles with shredded abs, tall, a full thick head of hair, square jaw, top notch game and frame with a mommy and daddy that raised you right and love you very much, and nothing seriously horrible has ever happened to you, and yet still have depression and anxiety. Because depression and anxiety are caused by chemical imbalances in the brain. Maybe you accidentally t…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/17 07:32 PM
-1

Not necessarily a guy who is bad looking. Its men they subconsciously deem to be low SMV that they associate as creepy
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/17 04:07 PM
2

The penalty tax we have to pay for being single is not optional
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/17 07:45 PM
1

Op was right that they're more picky because sperm is far more abundant than eggs
/r/TheRedPill13/07/17 12:54 PM
0

Delta and gamma males aren't real. GTFO with that shit
/r/TheRedPill12/07/17 02:28 PM
3

Why do women and Leftists ALWAYS have trouble telling cause and effect? Leftists don't understand the basic laws of supply and demand. That's why they support crazy things like minimum wage (price floor on the cost of labor) and price controls on drugs (price ceilings on the cost of drugs). Price floors create a surplus and price ceilings create shortages. Econ 101. Minimum wage is a price floor that creates a surplus of labor (unemployment) and price ceilings on drugs create a shortage of drugs…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/17 01:41 AM
1

Well not all women have empathy for their children but I think most do. Empathy towards men is non existent, though they might have strong sympathy for Alpha males. Betas get no sympathy from any women except their mothers
/r/TheRedPill11/07/17 03:17 AM
1

Yes they do, they have empathy for their children
/r/TheRedPill11/07/17 03:05 AM
14

Marriage is one compromise after another? Correct, and that's why you should be getting married to a person who has similar values Wrong, you shouldn't be getting married at all. GTFO
/r/TheRedPill11/07/17 02:53 AM
2

Yeah, my oneitis ex went from an HB8 at age 24 to an HB6 at age 30.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/17 12:09 AM
4

Because its primarily the females job to ensure that good genes get passed on, both at the individual level and at the collective level. Sperm is worthless, eggs are valuable. That's why preselection is even a thing, so they can work together as a group to decide which men reproduce and which dont.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/17 07:17 PM
16

It's very true. Women act like this towards low SMV men because not only do the women not want to reproduce with them, but they want to do whatever they can to ensure that no other women want to as well, ever. It is preselection in reverse. They do not want low SMV men to improve themselves because they have already determined that he is unfit for reproductive success. They put him in a little omega box and they want him to stay there by public humiliation, relentless shit testing, and a general…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/17 03:00 PM
1

For having sex, it's irrelevant. For an LTR, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 10:56 PM
14

You've come to the right place. Being cheated on is one of the worst feelings of betrayal one can experience.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/17 10:50 PM
1

So continuing to fund power structures that cover up rape doesn't create a rape culture? That doesn't make any sense.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/17 10:32 PM
–

They just do that for PR reasons. Male and especially child rape get covered up because they don't count as much.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/17 01:41 PM
19

I don't get why Ben doesn't just find some hot 21 year old piece of ass to have fun with on the side instead of some manly looking, high profile post-wall hag. Maybe he has a fetish for that sort of thing.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/17 01:37 PM
10

I disagree OP. There is a rape culture, and it exists in power structures like government, college campuses, and the Catholic Church. These organizations have every incentive to keep their victims quiet, to wash over the incident, and indoctrinate their membership with so much propaganda to ensure loyalty to the power structure that child rape gets brushed off as "just a few bad apples". Many of the feminists who go around talking about rape culture will attend colleges like Penn State Universit…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/17 01:12 PM
1

You're overthinking some of this. If you want to use a machine or bench or weights that someone is on, just ask how many more sets they have or if you can work in with them. It's not that hard. 99% of them won't give you any shit for it.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/17 08:50 PM
3

Women will do anything to feel chads penis even just once.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/17 08:41 PM
17

Just the ex's friend demonstrating that she wants you is enough. If the ex's friend can't have you, watch how she treats your ex. Like total garbage.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/17 07:08 PM
1

I really blame TRP for making gyms a miserable experience for those who lift for themselves. I believe TRP is responsible for this new wave of guys hitting the gym with the sole purpose of scoring pussy I didn't understand this many years ago when I was a noob at lifting and I still don't understand this mentality. It doesn't matter what your motivations are for lifting. Whether you want to look better, feel better, score pussy, be healthier, be more disciplined, or whatever other reason you can…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/17 01:08 AM
1

Sounds like someone who threw the pill up as it started to digest, rather than someone who digested the pill. These people were never Red Pill to begin with. They're just a bunch of blue pillers that turned purple and then went back to blue, but refuse to have serious discussion about it like we do on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 10:09 AM
1

Calling it dumb misogynist bullshit doesn't change the fact that it works. Also it's not racist or anti-semitic, those are just trolls.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 10:03 AM
1

Political leanings are irrelevant to tingles.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 01:57 AM
2

It's the concept of AWALT that most people view as immoral. (Of course it doesn't literally mean All Women Are Like That, it means 99.9% of women are like that.). When you say that you believe all women would branch swing or cheat under the right circumstances, it can be used to justify men cheating under any circumstances as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 09:54 PM
2

I'd always leave a message so she doesn't think you called her by accident
/r/TheRedPill02/07/17 06:49 PM
10

Its funny that people here are associating capitalism with masculinity That's because true capitalism (anarcho-capitalism) is the only way to organize a society that is compatible with a red pill way of life. What you're talking about is state-capitalism, which involves a good deal of central economic planning and socialist elements. we're coerced into working at-least eight hours a day, carrying out repetitive, boring tasks, building products we don't care about on behalf of men of higher rank.…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/17 10:34 AM
2

We are engrained from birth to learn from our fathers, that anything they say is right and we should listen. (I believe this is evolutionary). Yes I do too. It makes me sad that you were deprived the experience of being raised by a good father. No child deserves that.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/17 10:16 AM
1

Do you mean new new, or just new to you?
/r/TheRedPill02/07/17 10:12 AM
3

You probably could have sued the hell out of her. I'm sure with the amount of proof that she was lying, your lawyer and a judge would have agreed.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/17 10:10 AM
47

In my blue pill days several years ago, one of my plates was a 19 year old HB8. I had already deleted all social media by that point. I NEVER texted her, I would only call her and even then the conversations were purely logistical. "Hey. When are you free? Let's chill on this day. Bye." Our entire relationship from beginning to end was face to face, old school style. It was pretty nice while it lasted...but then she wanted commitment and that just fucked everything up. I wasn't looking for a gir…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/17 07:10 PM
1

Do whatever you want to do, I don't care
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/17 12:08 AM
1

There's no such thing as a loyal woman. Women are only opportunistically loyal, they will not hesitate to branch swing from you if the right option comes along.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/17 11:27 PM
5

That's why many of us have to take mind altering drugs on a daily basis to pull the reins on our inability to stop worrying
/r/TheRedPill27/06/17 08:47 PM
2

In my BP days I still had some red pill tendencies like not committing to women I felt were low quality, spinning plates, etc. but I deliberately ignored my instincts and committed to a slut because she was really hot. I knew sluts were bad news because of their impaired ability to bond. I got burned badly for that because she cheated on me. I went MGTOW for a few years then I discovered TRP and it resurrected me
/r/TheRedPill27/06/17 06:00 PM
–

Foolish. Law 38: Think as you like, but behave like others
/r/TheRedPill27/06/17 01:53 AM
11

Because when she's acting like a brat there is no better way to get her to submit than to logically destroy her position, put her on the spot and demand that she logically defend her position while she's crying. then when she fails, you hold frame by withdrawing affection, and then when she enters your frame you anger fuck the hell out of her. I don't give a shit how she feels around her friends or what her friends or my friends think of me. I am not hesitant to express my opinions of legal marr…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/17 02:31 PM
8

PUAs use game because it works...they just don't know why it works. TRP explains nearly perfectly why it works. When you understand why it works, everything else falls into place. Those of us who have fully digested the pill and are through the five stages of grief know how much better life is viewing it through TRP lens. Everything just makes sense now and it's like playing life on easy mode.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/17 03:01 AM
74

Everything in your post reminds me of something that happened the other night. My LTR knows how against legal marriage I am and she agrees it's a bad deal for men. I told her I am not necessarily opposed to a religious marriage that doesn't involve government in anyway, but that I just don't really see the point in making a promise to a vengeful omnipotent deity if I can't guarantee that I can keep it. The only way I'd ever get involved in such an arrangement was if I was planning on starting a …
/r/TheRedPill26/06/17 02:44 AM
1

Any subjective moral code one can think of is not logically consistent if it isn't based on the Golden and Silver Rules. If that's true, then we can say that the Golden and Silver Rules are the only objective moralities that exist. Most people only abide by the Golden and Silver rules when its convenient for them. I don't think there is any correlation between someone who is moral and their biological sex. Humans in general tend to be immoral, that's why our country is so fucked up...because imm…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 07:16 PM
7

Yep...Red Pill never was and never will be PUA. PUAs are just blue pillers that have game
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 07:07 PM
5

It makes sense that mate poaching for an LTR is a bad strategy because it means she will be more likely than other women to allow herself to be poached from YOU in the future. Sort of like how women with high partner counts make bad LTRs because it means she doesn't keep her male partners around for whatever reason. All women will cheat and/or branch swing under the right circumstances. Never delude yourself into thinking otherwise. That's AWALT. But also remember that some women are better than…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 03:31 PM
7

Aggressive betas in general are mentally unstable and thus are extremely dangerous. They must be avoided at all costs.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 02:36 PM
25

Hypergamy is a great and beautiful thing. Embrace it because without it, we likely wouldn't be here. We are the sons of the Chad Thundercocks of yesteryears because our female ancestors cucked the betas of their time. Feminism and the internet have ushered in an era where women are able to take advantage of their hypergamy more efficiently than they ever have in history. Access to abortion, cheap birth control methods, being able to travel the world, phones, and Tinder have all ensured that wome…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 02:29 PM
1

"The law isn't perfect and therefore I'll reject it entirely." How utterly naive. Didn't say that. There you go again straw manning me Even the attorney who represented her in the Petrikis case was quoted as saying "this is unheard of." And now will be used as precedent for future cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 08:34 PM
1

I failed to disclose 5% of my assets because I forgot about that solid gold bar I inherited from my aunt 30 years ago. It was buried in the attic. Fraud. And yes, the law does work against people constantly. Our Liberty is being eroded on a daily basis. That is a whole other discussion I don't want to get into right now but you are very naive if you don't think the law is designed to work against the individual. Here's an example of a prenup being thrown out on the basis of a supposed oral excha…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 07:32 PM
1

For some reason you are failing to comprehend this. Suppose the law and precedent have shown that anything less than 5% is immaterial and has always been considered immaterial, but I left off 5.00001% out of the prenup. The judge could decide to not cut me any slack if he doesn't like my face. He could decide that I've committed fraud based on his emotions and the subjective and arbitrary 5% figure that the state came up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 01:52 PM
1

Literally in your example you used a "shampoo bottle" if I'm not supposed to interpret that as something VERY trivial why the fuck did you use something like that at all. Because it illustrates the point that what you consider to be trivial and what I consider to be trivial could be two very different things. I could consider anything less than 5% of my assets to be trivial, but the judge might decide anything less than 4.9% constitutes fraud. Once again you don't know law, you have not idea how…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 12:46 PM
1

Depends entirely on your definition of the word "trivial", now doesn't it? There is absolutely not a "slim-to-none" or "very unlikely" chance that what I consider to be trivial and what the judge considers to be trivial could easily be two very different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 02:48 AM
1

The evidence is the fact that the situation I described about fraud is possible. The evidence is that not everyone who fights over a prenup has the money it takes to appeal. You still have failed to prove your claim and you keep dodging it, so I'll take that as an admission that you're incapable of backing up your own BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 02:37 AM
1

Your "well sourced thread" fails to rebut my point that it's certainly possible that a small percentage of my assets, which I consider irrelevant to a prenup, could very well be made into a case for me committing fraud, and the judge could simply decide to agree that I've committed fraud if he doesn't like my face. Poof, there goes the prenup. Your "well sourced thread" also fails to prove your black and white claim that everyone who fights over a prenup has the money it takes to appeal. It's in…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 01:47 AM
1

That is indisputably false. Lmao. Obviously not Do you have any idea how precedent works? Or let's even take that back, how the legal system works? Yep "Fraud" is a legal question, judges are the arbiters of legal questions regardless of the type of case, be it family, criminal or civil. Yep Judges cannot and do not willy-nilly arbitrarily decide legal questions based on their subjective opinion. Yes they do sometimes. In those situations, their decisions are based on their subjective opinions a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 01:23 AM
1

Your example of "failure to disclose a shampoo bottle" is absolutely ludicrous based upon all the information I gave you. You are absolutely wrong in even attempting to argue something trivial like that equals fraud under the law. You want to argue extreme potential nearly certainly unlikely exceptions somehow invalidate the rule and that's just wrong. If that's not fraud, then what is? Where does the line get drawn? It's totally arbitrary and subjective, which means it's up to the random whim o…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 12:36 AM
1

You're just talking to talk? Nope. Don't get all semantics on me. Then don't try to gaslight me by saying I didn't answer a question, when you never asked one in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 12:15 AM
1

You clearly didn't because you used some "failure to disclose a shampoo bottle" when the linked article specifically states: The only thing that your source says is that sometimes it can be difficult to overturn a prenup based on fraud. That doesn't disprove my example in any way. I didn't support your point, in any way. I countered it. You said that "[failure to disclose a shampoo bottle] would be very likely to invalidate a prenup." While I don't agree that it would necessarily be very likely,…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 12:12 AM
1

Neither. Also, that's not a question.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 12:03 AM
1

Read the sidebar and find out for yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 07:18 PM
1

Read the sidebar and find out for yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 07:18 PM
1

Did you read the linked article at the top of my OP? Yes Something like that would be very likely to invalidate a prenup. Thanks for further supporting my point Why would you be too poor to appeal your case? Why is anybody too poor to afford a lawyer and/or taking time off work to go to court? Because they don't make enough money, obviously. Do you think in the absence of a prenup the breadwinner gets nothing? Depends on the sex of the breadwinner. If a woman, probably never. If a man, probably …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 07:13 PM
1

Because there was zero evidence that the prenup was fraudulent. It was based entirely on her word Just linking to the first thing in Google for "prenup thrown out" doesn't give evidence to your claim I did no such thing
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 07:07 PM
1

I don't care what you think about what I'm thinking because you're wrong about me anyway What question?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 07:03 PM
1

Here's one http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/04/n-y-prenup-battle-winner-destroyed-family-with-affair-cousin-says/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 09:20 PM
1

Suppose he does have factual and legal findings, like that I didn't declare a bottle of shampoo. How can the judge be overturned for being an asshole if I'm too poor to appeal the case (maybe because he just stripped me of my prenup) or don't have the time to appeal, or my appeal gets denied?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 08:06 PM
0

The fact is that prenups still can be thrown out at the random whim of a judge (however uncommon that may be). Maybe he decides that bottle of shampoo you forgot to assetize can be considered "assset misrepresentation". Or maybe the judge is drunk. Or maybe he just doesn't like your face. Better to just not get married in the first place than put your future in the hands of one judge. The risks far outweigh the rewards for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 07:35 PM
1

I'll take that as an admission that you're incapable of defending your viewpoint
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 07:28 PM
1

Stop moving the goal posts. Were talking about making a woman fuck you, not making a woman want to fuck you. Again, Chad is a fictional character. If he did exist, his mere existence would cause every woman to cheat with him because they all want his sperm. That's not paranoia, it's literally the definition of the Chad archetype.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 07:22 PM
1

Feel free to explain how that's "making" a woman fuck you. All women will cheat under the right circumstances, and it's always the right circumstances when Chad is involved. Therefore, all women voluntarily comply with Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 07:11 PM
1

Great. How is Casanova relevant to this conversation? The point is that you can't equate masculinity and alpha. They're not the same thing. Chad is a fictional superhero and so you have to assume fictional logistics and friction as well. In our simulated reality, They will always drop their panties for Chad no matter what.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 06:38 PM
1

I don't know. How did Casanova make women want him? Your example of male on male rape is exactly why masculinity should not be equated with being Alpha. Being Alpha is just being the guy that women want to fuck (Chad Thundercock). Sure there is a lot of overlap between being Alpha and being masculine, but the two are not equivalent. Equating them is blue pill thinking. Chad Thundercock can't logically rape a woman because any woman he wants to have sex with wants to have sex with him. Rape is ei…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 06:08 PM
3

Feel free to explain how I can "make" a woman have sex with me without raping her. Chad Thundercock can have just about any woman he wants and if she doesn't want him, he has abundance mentality to just NEXT. Rape is for low SMV blue pill losers who need to use force to get a woman to have sex with them because they lack abundance mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 08:35 PM
2

I did absolutely no such thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 08:26 PM
0

What the fuck does your post have to do with my post?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 08:13 PM
2

No it's not
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 08:12 PM
2

Yes, unless you rape them you can't "make" them do anything. But Rape is BP anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 08:00 PM
2

Totally false. It's misogynistic to act as if women have no agency, which is what you're doing OP. Women have the agency to say no to whoever they don't want to sleep with.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 07:57 PM
2

The best way to get back at a woman who has wronged you is to withdraw attention completely and continuously improve your SMV
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 07:51 PM
1

Songwriting is the same way. Much of the time Ill get struck with an idea and start off writing the middle of the song, and the rest of the songwriting process is like a logic puzzle figuring out how to get there while evoking the emotions I want the listener to feel.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/17 12:26 AM
2

She's going to get pregnant accuse you of being the father
/r/TheRedPill18/06/17 10:25 PM
7

That's how I always took it
/r/TheRedPill18/06/17 10:17 PM
1

Nothing you said makes any sense. I'm not a trust fund baby. Go harass someone else
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 09:11 PM
1

That's because nearly identical situations have happened billions of times since the dawn of humanity. Except nowadays we have big daddy government forcing all of us to be the BB for the little bastard when she inevitably ends up on welfare
/r/TheRedPill18/06/17 06:42 PM
3

We met up and I gave her $450 in cash due to her losing her job Congratulations, you gave some slut money to murder a baby that wasn't even yours.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/17 06:39 PM
1

The point is that there is no such thing as anarcho-collectivism. It's just a commune existing within an anarcho-capitalist framework. Otherwise it's not anarchist. If people are free to voluntarily associate, then that is individualism. If they are not, then that is statism/collectivism. You cannot separate collectivism from statism.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 06:09 PM
2

If the people were all voluntarily doing so, then those communes were existing within an anarcho-capitalist framework because then the people were also free to engage in voluntary contracts to create capitalist structures. If they were not free to do so, it was only because the so-called "anarchistic" communes actually did have a state to violently prevent them from engaging in voluntary association.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 06:01 PM
2

You can't have collectivism without a state to enforce it
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 05:41 PM
1

Government is the #1 Enemy of the Red Pill Man
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 05:37 PM
1

This is the path I followed. I've just killed as much beta behavior and characteristics as possible, and am continuing to do so by continuously improving my SMV (looks, game, status, money).
/r/TheRedPill17/06/17 05:16 PM
1

In my BP days female friends used to tease me because of how deep my voice is. They said I sound like the voice of God.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 03:54 AM
1

How about women donate money to stop men from getting thrown in prison to be raped for smoking a plant
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 03:52 AM
8

I think she is doing nothing more than trying to get validation and attention on YouTube
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 03:51 AM
2

I had to quit eating sugar for a while due to a medical condition. I was actually able to feel feelings again. I don't recommend completely cutting out sugar, but it's definitely good to minimize it. You should be getting almost all your carbs from complex grains and fiber.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 02:27 AM
1

I must admit, I do think a woman who is slightly toned is more attractive. But I highly doubt an untoned woman with a healthy BF% is as unattractive to men as a skinny fat guy with zero muscle is to women.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 02:26 AM
1

Is there really such thing as a skinny-fat girl though? I thought that just applied to men who have almost overweight BMI and zero muscle
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 01:12 AM
1

Okay so empires rise and fall that much is true. But the art and historical impact they create is more eternal and lasting than dead beat "stateless" societies. You can't prove that the reason their historical impact was so great was because they had a government. I'm thinking anything from medieval Iceland to Free Territory Ukraine, none of those made an impact like the Roman or Chinese empire. What sources do you have that prove that those were stagnant stateless societies?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 12:23 AM
1

The Roman government destroyed the Roman Empire by inflating the currency away to nothing. Which stateless societies are you referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 10:49 PM
1

Of course you'd talk to him if your boyfriend wasn't present. The point is you're willing to disrespect your boyfriend behind his back by intentionally putting yourself in a scenario where you're "just talking with" an incredibly higher SMV male than what you already have. Thats even worse than doing it right in front of him because of the covert nature of it. But since you are a woman, you inherently don't view it that way because you are viewing reality through a hypergamous lens. You are also…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 05:36 PM
1

Do you honestly believe that you'd walk away from your favorite hottest male celebrity if he was talking to you and turning you on?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:35 PM
1

That may be true but if you managed to unintentionally find yourself in a situation where you were out, away from your S/O and anyone who would judge you, were really horny and maybe a little drunk, and the hottest male celebrity walked in and started properly gaming you, you would branch swing and/or cheat with him. All women will cheat and/or branch swing under the right circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:07 PM
1

That's why they call it The Red Pill. It's not meant for most men, and it's outright dangerous for some men to swallow it. Some men cannot psychologically handle the truth, especially those who are mentally unstable to begin with. They get to the 4th phase of the 5 Stages of Grief (Depression) and get stuck there. This can have serious consequences like suicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 03:34 PM
1

Yes she can reconvince herself. But if there's a chance for her to branch swing to a higher SMV man then her hamster will stop being able to convince itself that hubby is the best she can get. This would still be true even if there were no economic advantages for women in divorces, because the hierarchy of love. Women are incapable of loving men with the same loyalty and devotion with which men can love women. Women are only capable of providing that sort of loyalty and devotional love to their …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 03:21 PM
1

Both. Female hypergamy demands it. The only reason a woman stays married to a man is because she's subconsciously convinced he's the highest SMV man she can get at that current point in time, and the risks of divorcing him outweigh the rewards.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 03:10 PM
1

Of course but women leave men more often, especially when they have an economic incentive to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 02:08 PM
1

The inherent concept of a frat does seem a little gay to me. That's one reason I was never interested in joining one in college. Same with the military.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 01:33 PM
1

That's not necessarily true at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 01:21 PM
1

An insatiable desire for male attention, hangs out with lots of guy friends, the average quality of her female friends, a history of cheating, rapidly cycling through partners, piercings/tattoos, unnatural hair color, coming from a broken family, rampant drug use, run-ins with the law, serious mental health issues, being left of center politically and/or a third wave feminist, a general masculine personality, and the thousand-cock stare That's just what I can think of off the top of my head.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 12:59 PM
1

You got banned because you're a woman invading a male safe space Also statists hate the free market, and many RPers are statists. So yes you can be anti free market and be allowed to post on TRP.
/r/ExRedPill15/06/17 12:40 PM
1

Our politicians were elected by an immoral democratic majority. What makes you think direct democracy will somehow solve the problems caused by an immoral population? It will magnify them by 10 because now suddenly there is no mechanism to keep a check on tyranny of the majority. Direct democracy is nothing more than mob rule. Awful idea.
/r/ExRedPill15/06/17 12:38 PM
1

You're assuming that mods have to agree with the ideologies of the subs they mod. They don't, they just have to do their jobs. You're also falsely equating manipulation and using with lying.
/r/ExRedPill15/06/17 12:33 PM
4

"Haha wow you have lost some weight since school, though I'm not surprised, most people who hate themselves lose weight" Is she fat?
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 11:31 AM
2

I think those guys are still in the anger phase. Women are half the reason civilization is as advanced as it is today. Women are the ones who decide which males get to pass on their genetics and which don't. Their relentless, amoral hypergamy ensures it. The most superior genetics are passed on and civilization continues to advance because of it. Loyalty is a patriarchal construct. Women are incapable of being loyal because loyalty prevents the propagation of superior genetics. This may sound li…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 08:44 PM
2

"Anti woman bias" is pretty subjective. What you consider to be anti-woman bias may not be at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 06:05 PM
1

Looks only matter when it comes to SMV. Whether she's relationship material or not is a totally different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 03:00 PM
1

The great thing about Wikipedia is you can go in and remove uncited claims yourself. Or at the very least insert a [[citation needed]] tag.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/17 03:16 AM
12

Looks > Game > Status > Money
/r/TheRedPill14/06/17 03:06 AM
26

Lifting is optional if you think having easy access to an abundance of young hot pussy is also optional. Lifting is optional if you think playing life on easy mode is optional.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/17 03:05 AM
108

Never going to happen. Morality and justice are irrelevant to how the state deals out its judgements.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/17 04:26 PM
3

Mao was better than Stalin
/r/TheRedPill13/06/17 02:40 PM
1

It's only once the wall approaches or hits that those women realize that they need to put more effort into being LTR worthy. For a lot of women, their solipsism makes them think that men want the same qualities in a long term partner that they themselves want. So they try to increase their social status and game to the point where they come off masculine. Other women don't even bother trying and just settle down with some beta they're not even really attracted to, and who they eventually dead-be…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 04:27 PM
2

This is the reason I'm not RP anymore. You clearly never were to begin with
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/17 03:04 PM
9

The incentive for girls to not suck is to keep an alpha guy around for an LTR and help raise their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/17 03:02 PM
1

You're assuming she's going to ever figure out that he's wearing lifts. Also wearing lifts isn't going to stop her from fucking him.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 01:15 PM
1

?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 12:57 PM
3

What about a 5'8" guy who wears 1" lifts? Small enough of an increase that it's only subconsciously noticeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 01:56 AM
3

I had no male mentor growing up. I was shy around women I wanted to fuck. I didn't give a shit about women I didn't want to fuck, and sometimes treated them like shit. The ones that I ignored or treated badly were the ones that were attracted to me. So I accidentally discovered some RP truths early on. Women don't want to sleep with men who have SMV below their own perceived SMV. If your goal is to get laid, being an asshole is always preferable to being nice. I never ever relied on game to get …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 10:01 PM
1

Her vagina feels really good
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 09:40 PM
2

It's ok guys. Any business model that favors gender quotas over quality of workers will inherently produce inferior goods and services and they will be more easily outcompeted. Consumers will punish their sexism. The free market always wins.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 11:53 AM
1

I've already been through enough pain with failed blue pill relationships. Any NEXTing I do from here on out couldn't possibly be as emotionally painful as what I've already gone through because I'm more numb to it, so I can handle it.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/17 08:18 PM
1

Simple. If she stops putting out, NEXT. And yes, bonding is one way but that's OK. It doesn't bother me that she could 100% detach herself from me in a second, because I've long accepted that's AWALT. I do what I can to minimize the chances of that happening by continuously improving my SMV. If she still branch swings, it's my fault for not improving my SMV fast enough. Either way, NEXT.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/17 06:09 PM
1

Eventually she'll figure you're just trying to make her jealous and it will backfire. She's only going to figure it out if you're an idiot about it. Hard mode for no benefit. Guaranteed pussy and bonding are not "no benefit".
/r/TheRedPill05/06/17 03:40 PM
–

They give off the appearance of being high status. In reality they could be homeless with no friends, no interesting hobbies, not good at anything, unemployed, etc.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/17 06:28 AM
17

The best you can do is keep improving your SMV to keep shit tests and the likelihood of branch swinging to a minimum, which is what you should be doing anyway regardless if you're in an LTR You don't necessarily have to fuck other women either, you just have to demonstrate that you're easily capable of fucking other hot women that make her feel insecure, for example by blatantly flirting with other women in front of her. Then afterwards you also have to be prepared for a wave of comfort tests so…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/17 04:49 AM
–

low-status men are invisible Unless they're hot and have excellent game, then status is irrelevant to whether or not she wants to fuck him.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/17 04:42 AM
1

So if your favorite hottest male celebrity started hitting on you, you'd think he was a creep? Not buying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 01:03 PM
1

I think game is more important than status in the long run. Though if status is high enough, it can be more powerful than top notch game at establishing initial attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 12:59 PM
1

Go for far lefties if you want an effeminate man to cuck
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 08:18 PM
1

Probably at least 80% if I had to guess. Depends on how good her current partner is at being Alpha Bucks
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 08:15 PM
1

I don't
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 08:04 PM
1

No make SMV also includes money game and status
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 08:02 PM
1

I don't think so. He was definitely attractive when he was young but now he's old and fat with a bad hairdo and fake tan. But he still has relatively high SMV because of his game, status, and money.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 08:01 PM
1

That's only because their game sucked. You wouldn't have felt the rapey vibe if they had properly gamed you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 07:54 PM
1

That's when the non hot guys get shit tested hardcore whereas the hot guy wouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 07:54 PM
2

Women also care about a man's game and social status, so no they don't care about looks as much as men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 07:52 PM
1

Women care about looks but not as much as men do. Women also care about a man's game and status. Money also matters if she's looking for more than just an Alpha Fucks. Men do not care about any of these other things when it comes to sexual attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 07:51 PM
4

Personality = game and status in TRP theory. They encompass every characteristic you listed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 07:47 PM
11

Life is so hard for Chad
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 07:43 PM
6

Please post pictures of women without makeup and Photoshop
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 01:17 AM
1

And game depends on looks. I agree that looks and game depend on each other, so the original point "If he presents himself to other people as dirty and ugly, he ain't got game at all" is meaningless in the context of the discussion.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 01:09 AM
1

Nope. But if someone "looks" ugly, then according to your own words, that involves looks.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 12:52 AM
2

I disagree with your unfounded opinion
/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 12:49 AM
1

Simply telling me to read the sidebar doesn't actually support your argument in any way.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 12:46 AM
2

By that logic, all of SMV is part of game and there's no such thing as game. GTFO.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 12:45 AM
2

That's not game, that's looks
/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 12:44 AM
2

I disagree with your opinion. IMO an HB10 retard with abs, square jaw, and Brad Pitt looks with zero game will almost always score more hot young pussy than an old smelly fat homeless guy with top notch game. Very statistically significant.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 11:39 PM
0

Your comment is pure naivety
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 08:27 PM
2

Then why are you arguing with my generalization?
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 08:05 PM
1

A 10/10 brad pitt looking retard with drool coming out of his mouth will get more hot pussy than an old fat ugly smelly homeless guy with rotting teeth and top notch game
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 08:04 PM
3

In order to study the effect a variable has on a system, you need to isolate that variable by setting all other variables equal to zero. A guy who has looks and nothing else will always get more hot young pussy than a guy who has game and nothing else. I don't understand how this is even remotely controversial.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 08:00 PM
0

Totally irrelevant to the point
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 07:59 PM
1

No shit they don't work in isolation, but in order to study a variable's effect on a system, you have to isolate it. I don't know who will win in your scenario because it depends on the girl. It's a stupid question and didn't warrant a response. All I know is that a 10/10 hot retarded beta will get more hot pussy than a 0/10 fat ugly smelly homeless guy with top notch game. I don't even understand how this is controversial.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 06:54 PM
2

Using extremes does prove the point because that's how you isolate the variables. A dude with all looks and nothing else will beat a dude with all game and nothing else. Looks > game
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 05:42 PM
1

10/10 drooling aspie with abs and a chiseled jaw with Brad Pitts face will get more hot pussy than a 0/10 fat smelly old ugly homeless guy with top notch game. Period.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 05:37 PM
5

So game partially depends on looks, while looks don't depend on game? Thanks for further solidifying my point.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 05:22 PM
-3

That doesn't mean anything. An 10/10 dweeb with zero game will score more hot young pussy in a club than an ugly smelly homeless guy with top notch game. Period.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 05:19 PM
4

Notice how you didn't even actually attempt to refute anything I said. An 10/10 dweeb with zero game will score more hot young pussy in a club than an ugly smelly homeless guy with top notch game. Period.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 05:16 PM
2

It's true that money can help you improve your looks and status immensely. But That doesn't make it more important at the end of the day, so no it's not nonsense.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 04:28 PM
7

And a smelly dirty ugly homeless guy with top notch game is still a smelly dirty ugly homeless guy
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 04:27 PM
11

So an HB10 will sleep with a smelly, dirty homeless guy with rotten teeth if his game is top notch? GTFO.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 03:57 PM
1

Yes I did, the title is false
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 03:33 PM
14

Game is not more important than looks. Looks > Game > Status > Money
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 03:15 PM
1

TRP does not advertise itself as a bunch of self actualized losers. That's a false insult you made up TRP is not misogynistic because we don't hate women. Only some of our angrier members do
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 08:45 PM
1

I don't take the philosophy as an insult. I take your comment that "TRP advertises itself as a bunch of self actualized losers" is a slanderous insult. TRP doesn't call those things evil, it calls those things amoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 08:43 PM
1

You missed the point of OP's post. It's to call out Blue Pillers on their lack of solutions
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 08:31 PM
1

We already concluded that your argument boils down to an insult. Now you're trying to argue that your insult is justified based on a straw man. TRP doesn't say that women are evil- you fabricated that. There's nothing else to tackle.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 08:16 PM
1

Most RP literature does not tell one to assume that women are evil. You fabricated that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 08:08 PM
1

You said that TRP's pretend secret to success is "Be emotionally walled off and assume all women are evil". That's false.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 07:56 PM
1

Nowhere does it say to assume that all women are evil
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 07:39 PM
1

He was being sarcastic
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 07:28 PM
1

Nice straw man
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 07:27 PM
1

You are extremely confused. RP doesn't claim the absolute truth. It claims conjecture that hasn't been disproven.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 07:25 PM
1

Thanks for your useless contribution to the discussion
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 07:13 PM
7

What happens if it's just a random picture being taken and she happened to see the photographer but the guy didn't. If he'd seen the photographer then maybe he would've looked at the camera too. So many unanswered questions. OP's point makes no sense.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 02:43 PM
8

What if you're taking a selfie together? Is she supposed to look at the guy instead of the camera?
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 05:32 AM
2

Relationships are beautiful once again after you fully digest the pill. You will recognize them and women for what they really are and have a much more realistic viewpoint. You'll also get way more out of them because she will worship the ground you walk on if you play your cards properly.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 03:45 AM
1

No, they're claiming it as conjecture that hasn't been disproven. I'm not aware of any TRP theory that claims it is objectively factual. You fabricated that straw man in your own mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 06:53 PM
1

How is that not the same? The left have a history of waging war on science and LGBT rights too. Half the voters in this country voted for Hillary Clinton, who just a short time ago was anti gay marriage. The left is full of wacko hippies that don't vaccinate their children. The Obama administration didn't care about the environment at all, they waged war all over the Middle East, refused to criminally prosecute BP execs for the deepwater Horizon spill, bailed out global warming causing gas car c…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 03:20 PM
1

It's not a non-falsifiable argument if they're not claiming that it's a fact. It's an opinion. I agree that it would be irrational to think an opinion that can't be falsified or proven is somehow factual. But I think you are setting up a straw man and knocking it down because I don't see anyone claiming that it's factual.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 03:14 PM
1

Saying that LTRs go smoother when men are the dominant ones in the relationship doesn't make the philosophy a cult. A philosophical viewpoint that attracts people who believe certain things doesn't make it a cult. The only valid point you bring up is the us vs them mentality. Having only one characteristic of a cult doesn't make it a cult. By that logic, reddits overwhelming anti-republican is vs them mentality makes it a cult too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 11:07 AM
1

There's a difference between a non-falsifiable argument and an opinion. That whole situation is totally subjective to begin with. You can't prove or disprove anything about it. Are you suggesting that just because red pillers have differing opinions on how well the relationship could be going that that makes them objectively wrong? Because that is not how logic works
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 11:01 AM
1

Not an argument, just an appeal to emotion fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 09:09 PM
1

And it needs the other points I listed in my OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 09:06 PM
1

So your argument is reduced to nothing more than a personal attack. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 07:37 PM
2

Translation: "I am incapable of defending my argument so I am going to run away and hide."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 07:05 PM
1

TRP isn't a "loose brotherhood". I don't actually know any of those people. It's just a subreddit dude, no different than this one. they also subscribe to common beliefs and agree to being better than everyone else, think they have the world figured out Sounds like most of Reddit if you ask me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 07:04 PM
2

The very fact you aren't actually rebutting anything I said really says something. Jus saying =\
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 07:00 PM
0

That's a false analogy. Praying isn't actively changing your mental and physical attributes as TRP says to do in order for it to work. Praying is just asking a supernatural entity to change reality for you. It's not even close to the same thing. And yes, the information is falsifiable. I'm just not aware of any scientific consensus that contradicts the info. Perhaps our Blue Pill friends can shed some light on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 06:37 PM
2

Street gangs absolutely have hierarchy. What are you talking about? They also have territories and commit crimes. None of those are characteristic of TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 06:34 PM
3

The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act, and feel (for example, members must get permission to date, change jobs, marry—or leaders prescribe what types of clothes to wear, where to live, whether or not to have children, how to discipline children, and so forth). There is no leadership in TRP and nobody needs permission to do any of that stuff. The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify whatever means it deems necessary. How doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 06:24 PM
3

Feminism is a socialpolitical movement and sexual strategy aimed at maximizing female power while minimizing female responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 03:51 PM
2

Many subreddit mods shut down discourse and debate. That doesn't make them cult-like, it just means it's not appropriate to debate the axioms and goals of the subreddit in that particular subreddit. That's why we have Purple Pill debate. You go to TRP to discuss TRP based on the axiom that you believe the material in the sidebar is correct. You go to PPD to debate the accuracy of the sidebar. Also, many people put down those who disagree with them. That has nothing to do with TRP but the charact…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 03:47 PM
1

I am an anarcho-capitalist, which is s far away from socialism as you can get. Inequality is mostly a creation of the state, because the state redistributes wealth from the bottom-up through various mechanisms. I also am physically very strong for my weight as I have been lifting for years. I don't support egalitarianism through the forces redistribution of wealth (socialism), but rather egalitarianism would be the natural result of an anarcho-capitalist system. So did these studies take into ac…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 02:59 PM
1

Capitalism inherently leads to the most amount of economic equality when the state does not distort the market via central economic planning.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 03:50 AM
14

It's a nice Disney bluepill fairytale that I badly wish to be true, but it isn't
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 03:40 AM
3

You're erroneously assuming that I'm blindly believing it without putting any critical thought into it or permanently applying it to my life. Why? You don't know anything about me. We don't have any hierarchy (much less leaders), we don't engage in mind-altering practices, we don't demand that people think/act a certain way, we have don't have membership (in fact, we actively discourage recruitment), we don't make profit, we don't have any group related activities or expect anyone to devote any …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 02:54 PM
3

You don't know what the word cult means. It doesn't matter what your opinion is of the sidebar, because it works
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 02:16 PM
1

And we got that notoriety by blue pillers mocking us, which draws more attention to us, which recruits more red pillers. If blue pillers read the sidebar, they'd have seen the laws of power and know Law 36: Disdain things you cannot have. Ignoring them is the best revenge.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 02:08 PM
–

Most of the posts are trash but the sidebar is good and every once in a while there's a decent post on there
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 02:04 PM
1

Zero to Low partner count
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 01:59 PM
3

It's just hypergamy. The only solution is to continuously be increasing your SMV so that she never considers the idea that she could've done better than you. That's the only way to minimize the chances of her branch swinging.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 01:45 PM
1

Nowhere did I say that it necessarily works for all of them
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 01:41 PM
1

I agree. Fortunately, I never said any such thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 03:26 AM
1

Look at how many subscribers there are to TRP sub
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 02:29 AM
2

Bullshit, I studied a stem field and I partied and got laid constantly. There wasn't a semester of college that I didn't have high quality pussy being thrown at me. My grades could have been better but they were still good enough to get my degree. Guys who don't have a social life in STEM fields don't know how to balance work with play to maximize happiness and success.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 08:39 PM
2

There's nothing idealistic about what he said. it's true. It doesn't matter whether you agree with TRP or not, because it works for hundreds of thousands of men where BP solutions failed, and nothing you say changes that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 08:35 PM
1

It specifically says providing resources. Having money/resources doesn't make you a provider.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 06:46 PM
2

Yeah sorry that my pesky facts and logic are getting in the way. I agree that I probably would take an obese fitness instructors advice with a grain of salt. But that certainly doesn't necessarily mean that anything he's saying is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 06:25 PM
1

Money isn't categorized as beta in TRP. Being willing to provide is beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 05:50 PM
2

That's an ad hominem logical fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 05:40 PM
8

Money lets me pursue my hobbies more efficiently, which makes me happier
/r/TheRedPill25/05/17 05:09 PM
2

You're lucky that you have a family that is supporting you and giving you good advice. Being cheated on really sucks but it will make a man out of you if you view it through the red pill lens.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/17 03:38 PM
1

I am strongly against the men's rights movement. Groups of people should not have rights, only individuals should. Men's rights and women's rights should not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 03:19 PM
1

You have it backwards. Chad is the archetype alpha. Alphas don't necessarily have to be as high status/money as Chad, or could be in jail. Etc.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/17 02:30 PM
1

You're an idiot. She admitted to you that she wants to get pregnant. She gave you a WARNING that if you fuck her she will end up getting pregnant and come to you to be the baby daddy. Whether or not you're actually the father is irrelevant. For the love of God, please just remain celibate. We don't need more stupidity being propagated through the gene pool.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/17 02:10 PM
0

No. Chad Thundercock IS the alpha archetype.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/17 11:33 PM
1

Actively using social media inherently puts you in women's frame. You think Chad Thundercock spends his time liking girls posts and attempting to get validation? No, because that's what women and betas spend their time and energy doing. That being said I'll concede that it's useful to have an inactive social media profile that serves to instantly establish social proof. I deleted all social media 6 years ago. The other night at the bar I wasn't even trying to look great and I got cold approached…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/17 05:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter