| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Correlation between pretty much every superficial trait valued by the blackpill and mating success = .092 :)That’s easy - because it’s important between males | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/04/21 06:28 PM |
| 2 | Infidelity and number of sexual partners are both under moderate genetic influence and the correlation between these two traits is strong (47%). The resulting genetic correlation between the two traits was .47, so nearly half the genes impacting on infidelity also affect number of sexual partners.I think you might mistake my colorful and casual language here on Reddit for misunderstanding the peer review process. I don’t think any journal editor would publish criticism as frank and crass as what I would spit out on a Reddit comment with the goal of communicating the crux with as little effort as possible. However, peer review is absolutely quite adversarial in more... civil way. I suspect you know this and we’re likely in more agreement than we’re realizing here. Still, that said, I don’… | /r/BlackPillScience | 19/02/21 06:37 AM |
| 1 | Infidelity and number of sexual partners are both under moderate genetic influence and the correlation between these two traits is strong (47%). The resulting genetic correlation between the two traits was .47, so nearly half the genes impacting on infidelity also affect number of sexual partners.Now that you mentioned it I checked - from Google scholar’s 114 listed citations of this paper, none seem to be about directly attacking the methodology, but there’s plenty of meta studies having to do with psycho-social characteristics and how that existing research lines up (or doesnt) with genetic research about the same topic. That said, when I clicked the Cambridge link I noted it had a publication date of 2012. Upon this quick look at the citations, I realized it was published online in 20… | /r/BlackPillScience | 19/02/21 06:13 AM |
| 3 | Infidelity and number of sexual partners are both under moderate genetic influence and the correlation between these two traits is strong (47%). The resulting genetic correlation between the two traits was .47, so nearly half the genes impacting on infidelity also affect number of sexual partners.First of all, here’s a link to the full Pdf. Second of all, I’m highly skeptical about the validity of this study. Aside from the fatal exposure to sampling bias involved in studying a social taboo, it’s more-so the deliberate neglect of certain obviously valuable additional data points that raise the biggest red flags to me. Their entire approach seems geared towards arriving at a certain conclusion (which they can pat themselves on the back as having achieved) to produce a study that gets a lo… | /r/BlackPillScience | 19/02/21 05:49 AM |
| 6 | Infidelity and number of sexual partners are both under moderate genetic influence and the correlation between these two traits is strong (47%). The resulting genetic correlation between the two traits was .47, so nearly half the genes impacting on infidelity also affect number of sexual partners.Not exactly the case actually. ”Classification: Infidelity was classified as a dichotomous trait on the basis of a subject’s response to the question ‘Whilst married or living with a partner in a sexual relation- ship, have you ever had sex with someone other than your husband or partner?’ Subjects were also asked with how many different people altogether they had had sexual intercourse (including both male and female partners), resulting in a continuous variable. Attitudes towards infidelity we… | /r/BlackPillScience | 19/02/21 05:18 AM |
| 2 | "women preferred omnivorous (meat-eating) men, rated them as more attractive, and felt more positive about them than vegetarians...vegetarian men were considered less attractive because they were perceived as less masculine" Timeo, S., & Suitner, C. (2018)scihub | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/01/21 11:48 PM |
| 17 | Weak, at best, correlation between reproductive success and attractiveness for cohort born 1937-1940Not true at all, I think whats unaccounted for in that viewpoint is the higher layer abstraction of Memetics which evolves and presents differential success much the same as genetics do. Culture and ideas shift fluidly like epigenetic expression does within the individual. At different points in time under different cultural and societal backdrops, I would expect to find shifting preferences accordingly. For example in times and places of widespread poverty and oppressive authoritarian regimes, … | /r/BlackPillScience | 24/09/20 06:20 AM |
| 2 | China is a communist shithole. Everyone is always talking about social justice, but china is always ignored.Thank you, this is unbelievable. Saving vid for next time some SJW language police comes at me | /r/MGTOW | 08/01/20 06:36 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter