TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

greatfreight Archive

View 4 posts and 45 comments by greatfreight on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

Singaporean men don't even get any benefits for doing NS. They should receive something like income tax waiver for 10 years as a reward for the service. Failing that, alternatively they could tack on a 50% additional tax every year on Singaporean women who haven't given birth yet, starting at the age of 30. Is that any more sexist than forcing men to do NS ? Why are men forced to do their national duty but women aren't? SG have a birth crisis after all, they have serious need for more births. Wh…
/r/MensRights07/07/26 05:51 AM
26

Can I also request White drivers only? Because I want my driver to look like me so I can feel more comfortable. It's the same logic as requesting for a woman driver.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 04:52 AM
58

Pier Morgan's wife posting instagram photos expressing her emotional cheating on her husband, and there are no consequences for her. Piers can't just walk away from the relationship without him paying for it, can't just divorce her without giving her half his assets, etc. If he cheats on her, Piers would be considered as toxic and abusive. Marriages are so one sided.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 09:29 AM
1

-Harder to get good grades at school because school cirriculums are biased towards the way women learn -Harder to get good jobs because corporations and governments prioritize hiring women over men -Harder to find a girlfriend/wife as it's mainly the chads getting matched with 90% of the girls on dating apps -Even if you're good looking and have a good job, it's hard to meet wifeable women (haven't been slutting around) -Even if you do find a unicorn woman and get married, in 5 years she can div…
/r/MensRights19/03/26 03:20 AM
61

No fault divorce is fine, it's the unfair asset division, unfair alimony, unfair loss of child custody, unfair calculation of child support, etc. that should be contested.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 10:24 AM
7

Millions of men are already being trapped hostage in their own marriages, what with the threat of losing half of your earnings and savings and future earnings. Even if they wanted to 'no fault divorce' the higher earning men are penalized.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 10:18 AM
2

I find in general male Uber drivers at least help out with adjusting the middle row of seats to allow passengers to reach the back row of seats more easily, and also to help load luggage into the boot. But women drivers generally will not help with moving the seats around or loading luggage, it's more do it yourself. And also male drivers might drive a bit more aggressively or faster to get you to your destination quicker. Honestly I'd rather a male Uber driver.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 07:48 AM
7

Prenups are one of the very few things that help men protect their assets in a marriage, and even then they not legally binding, they're only to be used as guidelines. It's ridiculous that the Rule of Law & Contract Law comes second to women's privilege. It's also ridiculous that in a prenup you specify at the time of marriage what items are to be considered separate from the marital assets, but then at the same time if at divorce time the judge may deem it unfair and deem it void. This is despi…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 09:12 AM
11

The problem is not the women. The problem is the laws. There is no reason for alimony to exist in this day and age. Likewise for asset splitting upon divorce, it doesn't make sense. If a woman wants to get divorced, fine let it be, but they should not be rewarded with alimony, house, assets and cash. This is one way to discourage divorce as well, to encourage strong committed families who strive towards betterment, rather than women just looking out for themselves only, their husbands and childr…
/r/MensRights17/04/25 06:58 AM
52

I think the use of "mansplaining" is much worse.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 07:21 AM
19

Despite the immense pain that divorces causes, why has no divorced man with sizable financial means advocated for divorce law reform? To make it fairer for men. Not even the rich like Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Michael Jordan, Dr Dre, Brad Pitt, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Steven Spielberg, etc the list goes on for miles. Nothing about divorce makes sense any more in 2024. Why is it still the case that post-divorce entitles a woman the lifestyle she became accustomed to during marriage? Why is it still t…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 06:56 AM
1

Agreed. It doesn't make sense. Marriage in this day and age doesn't make any sense whatsoever. It should be up to the man to decide how much of his wealth, assets, and money he wishes to relinquish to his ex-wife. Stripping a man of 50% of his assets by way of the court is highly unreasonable, unfair and a form of cruelty. It is legal robbery.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 07:47 AM
10

This applies to many things in general. Women are entitled to a lot of jobs that would have otherwise gone towards men. Women are entitled to free food on a first date. Women are entitled to be with a higher earning man. Women are entitled to half her husband's assets even if she hadn't worked a day in her life. Women are entitled to alimony payments after divorce. Women are entitled to get the house upon divorce, and have the man still paying the mortgage on it. Women are entitled to child cust…
/r/MensRights04/10/24 08:02 AM
2

A big part of his whole business is to sell prenups and charge thousands for this single document. A lot of times the prenup can work if the marriage is a short one, without kids. But the longer the marriage has existed, the more kids the couple have, the higher the chance of the prenup not working. When a prenup doesn't work you can't sue the lawyer who prescribed it for you, you can't sue the government or the court for having such unjust laws and rules, the system has failed you.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 03:11 AM
1

In this day and age, the following things make zero sense: No fault divorce Alimony 50% marital assets redistribution Default maternal custody Diversity Quotas Scholarships for Girls & Women
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:13 AM
15

Women have more rights to her man's money, than a man has over his own money.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 10:31 AM
25

Everything is literally in women's favor. The school curriculum was tailor made for girls back in 1980s and now the result is 66% of college admissions are women. In addition to this along with admissions quotas, Women have first priority at getting jobs because most corporations are promoting "diversity". Women don't need to first and foremost worry about income, because they can always rely on their partner for that. And in general men don't judge women on her income at least it's not a priori…
/r/MensRights16/07/24 08:51 AM
1

Wow, it seems 50-50 asset division on divorce doesn't exist in Singapore? At least for childless marriages? This is a very positive thing. Let's talk truthfully here, it is a huge win for the man in the case. Sure it doesn't make sense to take into account 'indirect contributions' and even then they unfairly attributed more to the woman than the man even when they said their indirect contributions were equal. But in the bigger picture the man gets to keep 90% of his money which is way better tha…
/r/MensRights11/07/24 05:43 AM
-21

They kinda do actually. Lots of industries including STEM companies are hiring 75-80% women only in a push for 'DEI' but also to save money like you suggested.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 03:33 AM
5

Prenups can be deemed void on a whim because it wasn't timely, or financial disclose was inaccurate, or it wasn't fair to both parties, or a ton of other reasons, despite being a document signed and agreed by both parties. Whereas no such lenience is placed upon men in marriage. There isn't a case where a married man can claim that he wasn't informed of the divorce process and that he did not know that his assets are part of marital assets to be shared with his ex-wife and that he has to pay to …
/r/MensRights07/05/24 11:38 AM
12

Very sad that to this day paternity fraud is still legal. Very sad that her cheating and/or committing fraud upon her husband makes no difference when dividing his assets on divorce. It defies all logic.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 04:43 AM
2

I wish there would be lawsuits against the various western governments for biased and unfair divorce laws.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 08:45 AM
7

The same problem exists on the Russia side, no reason to make it specific to Ukraine only. The war is a huge injustice to our fellow humans in the world, men deserve their basic human right to live life and to be free from wars, oppression and harm. Most men there aren't allowed to exit their country, haven't been able to consent to partaking in the war, and have their deaths, injuries and slavery forced upon them. It's systemic blatant harsh sexism against men and no one in the world cares abou…
/r/MensRights04/03/24 04:06 AM
25

That she is entitled to half his net worth and a share of his future earnings in the case of a divorce.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 08:36 AM
6

The point is not to delve into the story for its authenticity, but to bring up a much bigger point about how divorce allows for the legal robbery of one's assets, resources, funds and a share of future incomes which is atrocious and morally wrong. Whether the woman was cheating or the man was cheating, he nor anyone else does not deserve to lose half his net worth and be forced to give a share of his future incomes with his ex-wife. Divorce laws are horribly antiquated and don't belong in this d…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 05:58 AM
23

This guy is rich, handsome, ripped & talented and yet still his wife cheated on him? They've been married for over 20 years and have 3 kids already. She is absolutely scum of the earth, just a despicable human being. Yet the legal system rewards her for it, hey here's a free $10k per month go enjoy!
/r/MensRights04/01/24 05:20 AM
13

The risks of marriage far outweigh the benefits of marriage. The difference is so vast that in fact there seem to be close to zero benefits for marriage. People get married because Marriage is just the thing to do, to make it official with a long term girlfriend, but if it were analyzed deeply it is nothing but a liability for men with massive repercussions, and doesn't provide a safety net for men like it does for women, quite the opposite actually. If marriage was invented today for example no…
/r/MensRights03/01/24 06:57 AM
-4

Look you're absolutely right and at the end of the day, but we all have to live life the best we can with the cards life dealt to us. Woman in general will always long to date up and therefore in extension men date down, and also women in general will want their man to work, not sit at home all day.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 10:04 AM
3

The binding of Marriage is ironclad, for women at least. But Prenups are unreliable. When in divorce court of a marriage that had a prenup, the judge will consider three things, of which you have mentioned only two (independent legal rep in a timely fashion, and full disclosure). The third is they will consider the fairness of the prenup, the wording of it goes like: Would the less wealthy party be left in a “predicament of real need" if the agreement were strictly enforced? This is so subjectiv…
/r/MensRights17/11/23 05:54 AM
2

Great comment by user Spins13 talking about the marriage contract. "The funny part about contract law is both parties need to get something out of the contract. It is harder and harder to say that men do."
/r/MensRights10/10/23 05:43 AM
1

Prenups in many common law countries (UK, Australia, etc). get routinely thrown out despite being prepared by lawyers. It seems that rule of law / contract law gets discarded when it comes to women. Additionally, even with a prenup a huge chunk of assets will still have to paid, see Dr. Dre still had to pay $100M to his exwife he had a prenup with. After a divorce, alimony/maintenance would still probably need to paid to an ex-wife to maintain the standard of lifestyle she was accustomed to duri…
/r/MensRights24/08/23 05:12 AM
17

The marriage & divorce laws are unbelievably unfair and out of date. It is considered a "sacrifice" for a woman to drop out of the workforce and become a mother to the kids, even though this is a form of priviledge. Yet it is NOT considered a sacrifice for the man to be working long hours at a job and trying his best to provide the best lifestyle for his family, on the contrary this fact gets used against him in divorce court as his income gets used to calculate alimony & child support and to pr…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 04:58 AM
2

the state pays a lifetime salary What do you mean by this?
/r/MensRights21/08/23 06:02 AM
4

Found it. Repost: I (Carla 30) am 6months pregnant with mine and my husband's (Harry 31) first child. During this pregnancy, I've been very exhausted everyday and would usually come home from work and go to bed an hour later, then I'd wake up at midnight and reheat what Harry had made us for dinner. For context, I've been part of a huge work project that's been going on for months, and I've been extremely overworked. On top of this, my husband doesn't have a job at this moment and isn't looking …
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:04 AM
6

Post is deleted, anyone have it?
/r/MensRights15/08/23 11:35 PM
6

A woman who stops working voluntarily is considered a sacrifice which has legal favorable-to-the-woman implications upon divorce. A man who earns more and/or brings in more assets to the marriage isn't seen as a sacrifice and has legal favorable-to-the-woman implications upon divorce.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 04:58 AM
59

Feminists have completely destroyed marriage, rendering it a money transfer scheme for women.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 07:15 AM
1

Even when the girl is abusing her husband, abusing the country's immigration laws, she is still legally entitled to financial support and rights, assets, etc. It's unbelievable, women are always supported even when they're in the wrong.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 05:00 AM
2

You're a strong independent woman who don't need no man! Pay your own bills, make your own money, provide a good lifestyle for you and your children as you initiated the divorce and think you can do a better job. Be brave & confident and say no to payments from a man who is no longer your husband so he has no obligation to support you anymore.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:50 AM
5

Question: How does a guy convince his girlfriend to forego legal marriage and opt for long term cohabitation, have a wedding, act like they're married, and also raise kids and everything? All while still signing 'Single' on forms whenever it appears.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:30 AM
50

Marriage has become a joke. Women can just divorce whenever they like and get monthly payments based on a percentage of income by someone who is no longer married to them. She gets rewarded for destroying the family unit and arrangements have to be made to meet her new living situation because now they get 50/50 custody and the children have to be transferred between their parents homes every few days. The children suffer, the man suffers, but she wins on three accounts: She gets 50%+ child cust…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 04:48 AM
3

What's the ratio of m2f and f2m?
/r/MensRights03/07/23 07:02 AM
40

In general women date up financially, they desire to partner up with men who earn more than themselves. If women weren't entitled to 50% of his assets then they wouldn't be so interested in marriage and also subsequently in divorce. Marriage is a retirement plan for women, but divorce is a life destroyer for men. If the marriage does come down to divorce, chances are it's the girl who initiated it and she is entitled to payment either lumpsum or monthly or both. The man will not receive any mone…
/r/MensRights28/06/23 08:31 AM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights05/06/23 05:01 AM
3

Is there a fund for falsely accused men for legal expenses and advice in the UK he can turn to?
/r/MensRights25/05/23 10:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter