TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

greenlightideas Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by greenlightideas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

you'd probably get attacked by a mob when you try to explain that you're just "borrowing this kid for a day..."
/r/seduction08/10/14 01:44 AM
8

"How Is This Still a Thing...?"
/r/MensRights29/09/14 02:48 PM
5

Is this the reason why they can't let gay people get married? If they could, then roommates everywhere would be forced into marriage. Checkmate atheists.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 11:04 PM
1

Filled with fish oil
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:42 AM
10

This law could potentially make all men rapists; the only part that's left is for them to be accused. Which is actually what feminists have been saying loud and clear for a while now, and they're finally getting the law on their side to make it happen.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:14 PM
4

I'm not saying that men are being sexually harassed by women wearing skimpy clothing, but that it's easier for women to claim sexual harassment when they are. In places like school and business settings, I'd like to not have to worry about a random accusation. It's much harder to claim "he was leering at my boobs" when they aren't out in plain sight. Now when out in a public setting, people can wear whatever they want. The burden of proof is a lot higher in a public setting than an HR Office.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:30 AM
0

eh, but then you get into that whole "no matter what I'm wearing I'm not asking to be raped" shit. More like if women can claim that they need spaces like Curves so they can be safe from guys being creepers, then I believe men have just as much right to claim that there should be spaces where they can't be dressed too provocatively, for the safety of the men attending those spaces.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:01 AM
2

How about instead of the "male distraction" argument we begin phrasing it as an issue of safety for men? It's becoming more and more "dangerous" to be a man around women dressed provocatively due to the inability to protect themselves against claims of sexual harassment and the like. If you don't think that's a dangerous situation, ask any of the men whose lives have been ruined by false claims; whether or not legal action was taken against them. I think if women can claim to be afraid of gettin…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:39 PM
58

Thank God this story didn't make it to the national news scene; there's no way he'd be able to go back to his normal life if that had happened...
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:28 PM
9

"Men's tears" is the new slang for cum
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:13 PM
21

The "educate yourself" argument usually boils down to: "You can't tell me about God because you obviously don't have the same relationship I do with him." You'll never be "educated" enough, because if you were, you wouldn't be challenging her in the first place. It's like when you argue with your parents; you'll never win per se, but if you can get them to say certain phrases you know they've lost.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:03 PM
7

It's because mothers love their children and fathers want nothing to do with them at all /s
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:28 AM
0

Apparently you're supposed to let them know without telling them in words. Unfortunately I have not discovered how to pull off that particular 10-hit combo; maybe someone more skilled at this can explain it better
/r/seduction18/12/13 10:04 AM
2

The point I was trying to make was if both genders can be held responsible for the choice of getting behind the wheel while intoxicated, how does it suddenly all become the man's responsibility when the choice is to get between the sheets?
/r/MensRights30/11/13 11:25 PM
23

When two drunk drivers hit each other do the cops try to figure out what happened before assigning fault, or is that also treated as a game of check the genitals?
/r/MensRights30/11/13 07:45 AM
2

That's how the boys got the photos in the first place
/r/MensRights15/11/13 07:33 AM
18

Sounds like bad marketing for Hooters. "Now you can get mo-wings with mo-breast meat!"
/r/MensRights14/11/13 06:32 PM
10

What if you got your sperm checked once a month (every 3, biannually, etc.)? It wouldn't mean you're free from sexual responsibility after the procedure, but it would be much more akin to other forms of pregnancy prevention. As for there being a risk of it being irreversible, you don't stop producing sperm after a vasectomy, so it doesn't automatically prevent you from having a child later if you really wanted one. As for me, I personally do not want to raise children in my lifetime. Why should …
/r/MensRights10/11/13 12:39 AM
11

Is there any medical basis for denying it? I was thinking you should even be able to get an easy loan if you needed to. I could think of a million ways to demonstrate how it's a more viable economic option to not be able to have a kid.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 12:11 AM
48

I've been giving some thought into having a vasectomy. It's really the only option you're allowed as a male who wishes to be sexually active but not worry about being shouldered with the responsibilities of a child. Condoms just aren't a sure enough thing. And the law says once she's pregnant, it's too late to make it your decision. Instead of spending money on an abortion, put it towards making a proactive decision. Honestly I don't have all of the facts of the pros and cons that come with havi…
/r/MensRights09/11/13 10:19 PM
2

Now you may find it inconceiveable or at the very least a bit unlikely that the relative position of chicks at bars could have a special deep significance or meaning that exclusively applies to only you, but let me give you my assurance that these forecasts and predictions are all based on solid scientific documented evidence that you would have to be some kind of moron not to realize that every single one of them is absolutely true. Where was I?
/r/seduction25/07/13 04:48 PM
3

Passing laws based on the idea of "need" tends to lead to problems. It is up to the individual to determine what their personal needs are, and act to fulfill them accordingly. By allowing a faceless majority to determine what it is you "need" eventually you get into a situation where your needs become different than what the majority decided. It's at that point you find that you're SOL, because you no longer have the freedom to fulfill your needs.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter